If generative AI tech keep advancing, it's good for artists that have stories to tell, bad for art specialists, such as pure modelers, animators, riggers, etc...
this is just how advancements work. people are upset and mad because they are scared - rightfully so. but people are so brainwashed that a job defines your worth to society that they are slow to see that they need to start advocating and speaking for UBi so everyone can have a livable wage. In this day in age no reason why we should have labor for next man just to survive.
the price is way too high for the current quality of models. 99.9% of these can't be used in anything professional and would need significant work. It would probably be faster to just make them from scratch than try to fix them.
I see a lot of scared digital old school artists crying in the comments. AI is only beginning. A year from now, you might look for another job. But that's progress.
In all honesty, it still looks bad and u have not enough control over final product. I'm still waiting when we have more AI tools to help in creation process, then AI who focus on giving us a "final" product. Tbh i don't understand this pursue for finish art, models etc. We need more tools like Cascadeur.
That is very true. I don't use a lot of AI tools. The ones I do use are generally just part of the process. They help with a specific task while I maintain control of the project.
This certainly looks good enough to use as a first-iteration, and would certainly save time compared to modeling and texturing from scratch. How smart the UV unwraps will make a difference, but based on what it can do with geometry, I expect that the UV maps would be pretty easy to work with.
Photography is "lazy", I mean, you just point a camera and take pictures, right? And don't even get me started on digital art. These lazy people can't even be bothered to MIX THEIR PAINT and have a PROGRAM do it... Putting the sarcasm aside, AI is simply another lense for human creativity. The outcome of mediocrity is a user fault, not the tool itself.
@@sarcasticb22 Of course there’s no reason to blame AI, its just maths and codes. But then tool can do everything by just single click makes it not a tool, but worker. But anyway, I think humanity isn’t ready for this kind of tech yet.
@@tobbyman3d I understand your reading comprehension is rather low... But I said "putting the sarcasm aside". Do you know what sarcasm is? Perhaps GPT can help you with that?
that's a possibility for sure :) I am actually excited about this future even though it means I would lose my "job". And I mean not so much that the tools will do all of the work. I actually don't believe that. I mean more that we may get AI assistants that really provide good info so you don't need to circle around the internet to find out how to do what you need to do.
You don't have to predict the future to already see the negative effects of AI "creations". Portals like Pinterest have been completely flooded by them, destroying the point of using the portal for many people. Artstation managed to defend itself thanks to a boycott by artists who forced AI products to be tagged. If the same thing happens to 3D... currently, several to several dozen new games are released every day. If AI produces mass models at the click of a button, there will be 5 times more of these games, not to mention 3D animations, of which there will also be a ton. No one will be able to manage it, good works will be lost under the pressure of trash.
Art is dead already. Stupid of ai supportive artists, this will bring them more money by finishing the job fast. While the general public can do the same so easy
There are some that are nice. Quickmagic is the best single camera solution I know of. I think DeepMotion is also pretty nice. Here is my vide about Quick Magic ruclips.net/video/hX319_vXZPA/видео.html
@@CGDive One of the possible outcomes of AI is the loss of many human skills, including creativity. It will be a gradual process though, if it happens it will take more than one or two years. But it is a very possible scenario. AI may end up becoming a boon for creative processes but in this current climate i expect it to be other way around.
Should services scare me more than I see anything positive in them. Nevertheless, I will continue to practice modeling, sculpting, rigging, etc. and would rather do my own things than ever use, let alone support, such crap. Or, as always, your videos are great & educational :)
Definitely, keep practicing. One of my faults is probably that I don't seem to understand people who feel discouraged by the advances of AI. Practicing your art will not hurt you even if AI ends up replacing some parts of the commercial production process.
Loving the comments like "We'll be out of jobs" "AI is advancing fast" or hate towards this type of machine learning. 1. Many artists today are out of jobs anyway because of studio closures, market shifts, and the economy. 2. It's literally the beginnings of anything remotely resembling to an "AI". Anyone calling machine learning "AI" should refrain from commenting dumb things. It's a marketing term. 3. As a 3D artist working on projects from A to Z, I wish there were tools like automatic assets, automatic animations, automatic everything. I love doing all the technical aspects, but at some point it's repetitive and tiring. I want to spend more time on creativity rather than solving problems all day. So far the first models can imitate humans, create terrible fake images, and now also some form of 3D that you have to manually clean, making this tool a good retopology base, or just useless for now. Thank you Todor for making quality content. Relax people!
Saying the black box of weights that compose a model isn't an 'artificial intelligence' is definitely up for debate, because it depends entirely on how you define the term. What exactly comprises intelligence? What does a model need to be capable of to be an 'artificial intelligence' in your eyes?
amazing, unlike all the artist I dont hate AI everyone should be able to make art no matter what background, bcz where I am from its almost impossible to being able to give your ideas a vision but now they can. hate all you want but overall its gonna benefit people in need.
I wanna know if it can create models for other characters like if it needs multiple illustrations so they get the front and backside of said characters. 😅
Far too expensive at the moment. I'll let time and competition find a balanced and a fair price, it's still awesome tech regardless of pricing! I tested it out and it's pretty cool! Might have to keep my eye on this!
Thank you for sharing! I was wondering if something like this existed. It seems useful to a certain extent. Ignore the nay-sayers. We can use AI to help us create we just have to be careful to use our own creativity and not to rely on it for everything. I don't see it taking away creativity if it is used to speed up technical processes. Cutting edge technology is the future and we should embrace it, even if it makes some people uncomfortable. All technology evolves. If you make digital art, you have to evolve along with the software. If you don't want to change, then don't be in the business of making digital art. At first I was against AI, but it isn't going anywhere so we have to get used to it and use it for our benefit.
@@winxpusr Lmao, that's fair. I'm more so disappointed in CGDive for promoting such a tool. One could argue that it's a "good first step" for artists, but honestly, I think it'd be far better to start from scratch to learn from the experience, make much better results, and feel more gratified for the work you actually put in to say "I made that!" instead of letting a machine do the work. Like, what's the point of making art with Gen AI? For clout to say you "made something amazing"? Waiting to see "pretty" things from key words that some people claim to be hard to do and "as much work as real artists"? Why can't we put more attention and effort into tools that help with the tedious, repetitive processes in art instead, so artists can put more passion into the bigger things? Like filling up flat colors in 2D animation so you don't have to go frame by frame over and over, adding lines in posed faces like Spider-verse so they can focus on other aspects of animation, using a auto select in software like CSP, and so on. And even then, a human would still need to tweak what the tools did to complete their art. Generative AI takes away the life and connection to a human being behind the art, stealing from actual artists who, more often than not, do not consent to have their works put into a machine that spits out amalgamations of images, audio, or text. That's not even touching on how much it costs the environment to make these abominations. Sorry to reply with a paragraph, lol, but as an artist myself, I'm just saddened to see people that I used to follow, who share knowledge and helps others, turn out to side with Gen AI garbage. You'd think they'd understand why this stuff is not good, but I guess not.
@@LinRinku😂this is just like traditional art and digital art , you are the type of people to be stuck in the past , who cares if it’s ai no one Fr as long as it’s done , some of us don’t got time for modeling, just keep on this mind set and you will see
@@TopCuby Enjoy your lifeless, environment destroying, artist stealing technology, I guess. If you don't have time to put the effort into your work, I don't think you should get any kind of praise for the output a machine makes. If disabled people are already able to create incredible pieces of art without the use of GenAI, you people who insist on using it are just shameful. But hey, I'm just "stuck in the past," right? Cheers.
@@TopCuby Enjoy your lifeless, environment destroying, artist plagiarizing technology, I guess. If you don't have time to put the effort into your work, I don't think you should get any kind of praise for the output a machine makes. If even disabled people are already able to create incredible pieces of art without the use of Gen AI, you people who insist on using it are just shameful. But hey, I'm just "stuck in the past," right? Cheers.
this does seem good for a starting point… or maybe background assets. ngl, if Zbrush or some blender add on does not implement some kind of system like this soon, this AI softwares might start stealing their lunch money
Can you download other users models for free? These look kinda bad, but could be useful for background details or kitbashing. I also wish this tool was open source.
@@moonshot3159 is inevitable. But they don't take the AI seriously until the banks have for clients people that don't exist. The AI programers are crazy transhumanist cultists, only comparable to the fictional adeptus mecanicus.
I can see local indie studious using Ai to create characters and props to save time and money, but not big industry players. There aint no way studios like Blizzard or Rockstar or Id will trust this shit to design an enemy for a new doom for example, or to create a very complex character models with great topology for their games. Not in the nearest 100 years.
@@mclovin9478 You answered your own question :) The mathematician uses the calculator. A calculator (or even a computer) doesn't just make everyone a mathematician.
that model it gave you looks like garbage, and I have my doubts you asked Piti for permission to use his art of the character Wuffle there. this is an incredibly disappointing turn to see you taking and I regret giving you money in the past. I will be unsubscribing now. bye.
@spooderderg4077 I don't understand this "pattern" that you are seeing. How are these tut guys profiting from AI? At least I find it more difficult to grow the channel and sell my courses lately which could be due to AI. I also think that AI is more likely to make tut guys obsolete, than to replace all artists.
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
If generative AI tech keep advancing, it's good for artists that have stories to tell, bad for art specialists, such as pure modelers, animators, riggers, etc...
Say's who Ai can't generate a story?
you can ask chat gpt to make a sermon
this is just how advancements work. people are upset and mad because they are scared - rightfully so. but people are so brainwashed that a job defines your worth to society that they are slow to see that they need to start advocating and speaking for UBi so everyone can have a livable wage. In this day in age no reason why we should have labor for next man just to survive.
And no stories / animations will be special anymore except very few good onee
Luckily there are more of the former
the price is way too high for the current quality of models. 99.9% of these can't be used in anything professional and would need significant work. It would probably be faster to just make them from scratch than try to fix them.
True, and it's quite shameful to promote it anyway...
Good for a starting reference if you value your time
bro best video on this program i have seen thank you. i have been thinking about using this or meshy
I will have a review of Meshy soon as well. Both have strengths and weaknesses.
I see a lot of scared digital old school artists crying in the comments. AI is only beginning. A year from now, you might look for another job. But that's progress.
You too
In all honesty, it still looks bad and u have not enough control over final product.
I'm still waiting when we have more AI tools to help in creation process, then AI who focus on giving us a "final" product. Tbh i don't understand this pursue for finish art, models etc. We need more tools like Cascadeur.
That is very true. I don't use a lot of AI tools. The ones I do use are generally just part of the process. They help with a specific task while I maintain control of the project.
because you are too expensive for production
@@Cryunreal who is too expensive?
@@CGDive you. Human =)
This certainly looks good enough to use as a first-iteration, and would certainly save time compared to modeling and texturing from scratch. How smart the UV unwraps will make a difference, but based on what it can do with geometry, I expect that the UV maps would be pretty easy to work with.
“Bring creators 3d vision to life” more like ai vision. We have enough lazy 2d images no need to bring it into 3d.
Photography is "lazy", I mean, you just point a camera and take pictures, right? And don't even get me started on digital art. These lazy people can't even be bothered to MIX THEIR PAINT and have a PROGRAM do it... Putting the sarcasm aside, AI is simply another lense for human creativity. The outcome of mediocrity is a user fault, not the tool itself.
@@sarcasticb22 Of course there’s no reason to blame AI, its just maths and codes. But then tool can do everything by just single click makes it not a tool, but worker. But anyway, I think humanity isn’t ready for this kind of tech yet.
@@sarcasticb22 You don't know shoot about photography and digital art and it shows
@@tobbyman3d I understand your reading comprehension is rather low... But I said "putting the sarcasm aside". Do you know what sarcasm is? Perhaps GPT can help you with that?
@@sarcasticb22 You were being sarcastic but you were using it to bring the advent of photography and digital art into comparison with generative AI
It’s never been easier to achieve mediocrity! =P
looks cool, thanks!
Gross, guess things will be so easy soon we wont need youtubers telling us how to do it anymore.
that's a possibility for sure :) I am actually excited about this future even though it means I would lose my "job".
And I mean not so much that the tools will do all of the work. I actually don't believe that. I mean more that we may get AI assistants that really provide good info so you don't need to circle around the internet to find out how to do what you need to do.
@@CGDive might just get into gardening
@@menso3852 hah
I love Meshy. The faces are weird, but it works for zombies and demons.
haha, yeah
I did the same but the texture is not already applied
You don't have to predict the future to already see the negative effects of AI "creations".
Portals like Pinterest have been completely flooded by them, destroying the point of using the portal for many people.
Artstation managed to defend itself thanks to a boycott by artists who forced AI products to be tagged.
If the same thing happens to 3D... currently, several to several dozen new games are released every day. If AI produces mass models at the click of a button, there will be 5 times more of these games, not to mention 3D animations, of which there will also be a ton. No one will be able to manage it, good works will be lost under the pressure of trash.
Art is dead already. Stupid of ai supportive artists, this will bring them more money by finishing the job fast. While the general public can do the same so easy
I don’t care about ai until there’s a cheap motion capture solution with ai that isn’t jittery.
There are some that are nice. Quickmagic is the best single camera solution I know of. I think DeepMotion is also pretty nice.
Here is my vide about Quick Magic
ruclips.net/video/hX319_vXZPA/видео.html
The fuck is this heresy ?
It’s Omnissiah approved
Expect more devs like Palworld devs to use this tool to make their own version of Pokemons. Creativity will vanish in 1-2 year completely.
Creativity will vanish because of a version of Pokemon? I don't follow to be honest.
@@CGDive One of the possible outcomes of AI is the loss of many human skills, including creativity. It will be a gradual process though, if it happens it will take more than one or two years. But it is a very possible scenario. AI may end up becoming a boon for creative processes but in this current climate i expect it to be other way around.
Ignore him. He's just salty about pokemon being usurped by Palworld's success.
I did same, i got model and texture, vut in blender only model is there, textures dint apply plz help mee
I only know what I showed in the video. If you experience issues, get in touch with Rodin developers.
Should services scare me more than I see anything positive in them. Nevertheless, I will continue to practice modeling, sculpting, rigging, etc. and would rather do my own things than ever use, let alone support, such crap. Or, as always, your videos are great & educational :)
Definitely, keep practicing. One of my faults is probably that I don't seem to understand people who feel discouraged by the advances of AI. Practicing your art will not hurt you even if AI ends up replacing some parts of the commercial production process.
May this works with drawn images without colour just black silhouette and white fill colour?
I haven't tried that. I would guess that it is optimized for more standard color images
It helps a lot for blocking
This looks good for fast basemesh. Still a lot of work need by humans. Exiting times!
Loving the comments like "We'll be out of jobs" "AI is advancing fast" or hate towards this type of machine learning.
1. Many artists today are out of jobs anyway because of studio closures, market shifts, and the economy.
2. It's literally the beginnings of anything remotely resembling to an "AI". Anyone calling machine learning "AI" should refrain from commenting dumb things. It's a marketing term.
3. As a 3D artist working on projects from A to Z, I wish there were tools like automatic assets, automatic animations, automatic everything. I love doing all the technical aspects, but at some point it's repetitive and tiring. I want to spend more time on creativity rather than solving problems all day.
So far the first models can imitate humans, create terrible fake images, and now also some form of 3D that you have to manually clean, making this tool a good retopology base, or just useless for now. Thank you Todor for making quality content. Relax people!
You win the comment section on this one! :D
Saying the black box of weights that compose a model isn't an 'artificial intelligence' is definitely up for debate, because it depends entirely on how you define the term. What exactly comprises intelligence? What does a model need to be capable of to be an 'artificial intelligence' in your eyes?
This artists ai tools are forgetting who their clients are
amazing, unlike all the artist I dont hate AI everyone should be able to make art no matter what background, bcz where I am from its almost impossible to being able to give your ideas a vision but now they can.
hate all you want but overall its gonna benefit people in need.
not cool
I wanna know if it can create models for other characters like if it needs multiple illustrations so they get the front and backside of said characters. 😅
What I know is what I showed in the video. I don't fully understand the question but it sounds like one of the things I demonstrated.
Far too expensive at the moment. I'll let time and competition find a balanced and a fair price, it's still awesome tech regardless of pricing!
I tested it out and it's pretty cool! Might have to keep my eye on this!
Yeah, I think there can be specific type of productions which it is ideal for but certainly not something that is for everyone.
This generated models are still not ready to work. UVs are terrible, so we cannot edit textures. But the progress of AI modeling is impressive!
this is amazing!
Thank you for sharing! I was wondering if something like this existed. It seems useful to a certain extent. Ignore the nay-sayers. We can use AI to help us create we just have to be careful to use our own creativity and not to rely on it for everything. I don't see it taking away creativity if it is used to speed up technical processes. Cutting edge technology is the future and we should embrace it, even if it makes some people uncomfortable. All technology evolves. If you make digital art, you have to evolve along with the software. If you don't want to change, then don't be in the business of making digital art. At first I was against AI, but it isn't going anywhere so we have to get used to it and use it for our benefit.
glad to know that 3d AI is still shit
not for long sadly
Yeah I’m thinking 2025 will be the year of 3D A.I. Though that’s a looong time in this field currently, so could be sooner
@@DenzelCanvasSupport for very long....
It still looks concerningly good already.. it won't be long
Radahn is a new ai boss with no avoidable moveset that have no mercy to tarnished
makes sense!
I wish there was an ai software that quickly did retopology and prototyping bone rigging or maybe a hyper quick texture baking software
yeah, noone has an issue with that. :)
Only matter of time before we have open source free AI generated 3D character add on within blender. AI is moving fast.
That's good, AI should solve some technically boring tasks such as retopology.
In maya its already done with ai retopo
How disappointing.
How so, it's AI generated 3D, it promised trash and delivered exactly that, what is there to be disappointed about?
@@winxpusr Lmao, that's fair. I'm more so disappointed in CGDive for promoting such a tool. One could argue that it's a "good first step" for artists, but honestly, I think it'd be far better to start from scratch to learn from the experience, make much better results, and feel more gratified for the work you actually put in to say "I made that!" instead of letting a machine do the work. Like, what's the point of making art with Gen AI? For clout to say you "made something amazing"? Waiting to see "pretty" things from key words that some people claim to be hard to do and "as much work as real artists"?
Why can't we put more attention and effort into tools that help with the tedious, repetitive processes in art instead, so artists can put more passion into the bigger things? Like filling up flat colors in 2D animation so you don't have to go frame by frame over and over, adding lines in posed faces like Spider-verse so they can focus on other aspects of animation, using a auto select in software like CSP, and so on. And even then, a human would still need to tweak what the tools did to complete their art.
Generative AI takes away the life and connection to a human being behind the art, stealing from actual artists who, more often than not, do not consent to have their works put into a machine that spits out amalgamations of images, audio, or text. That's not even touching on how much it costs the environment to make these abominations.
Sorry to reply with a paragraph, lol, but as an artist myself, I'm just saddened to see people that I used to follow, who share knowledge and helps others, turn out to side with Gen AI garbage. You'd think they'd understand why this stuff is not good, but I guess not.
@@LinRinku😂this is just like traditional art and digital art , you are the type of people to be stuck in the past , who cares if it’s ai no one Fr as long as it’s done , some of us don’t got time for modeling, just keep on this mind set and you will see
@@TopCuby Enjoy your lifeless, environment destroying, artist stealing technology, I guess. If you don't have time to put the effort into your work, I don't think you should get any kind of praise for the output a machine makes. If disabled people are already able to create incredible pieces of art without the use of GenAI, you people who insist on using it are just shameful. But hey, I'm just "stuck in the past," right? Cheers.
@@TopCuby Enjoy your lifeless, environment destroying, artist plagiarizing technology, I guess. If you don't have time to put the effort into your work, I don't think you should get any kind of praise for the output a machine makes. If even disabled people are already able to create incredible pieces of art without the use of Gen AI, you people who insist on using it are just shameful. But hey, I'm just "stuck in the past," right? Cheers.
can i use 3d models for commercial with free account ?
I would say yes but I am not an expert. Ask the tool creators!
@@CGDive thanks, yee i asked 2 days ago and still waiting
@@CGDive so, i received an email from the developers and they said " that there are no licensing restrictions for Rodin-Gen1"
@@bergus541 Good to know, thanks!
That's some pretty rough topology. But maybe it's a good place to start.
Agreed!
this does seem good for a starting point… or maybe background assets.
ngl, if Zbrush or some blender add on does not implement some kind of system like this soon, this AI softwares might start stealing their lunch money
Can you download other users models for free? These look kinda bad, but could be useful for background details or kitbashing.
I also wish this tool was open source.
Looks like public models can be downloaded for 1 credit.
@@CGDive overpriced
Good enough for background objects.😪😪
We will all be withouth jobs :)
Nah, we'll be fine. But be ready to adapt professionally.
so many ignorant artists parroting this sentiment. AI will not replace human creativity don't be a sheep.
@@moonshot3159 is inevitable.
But they don't take the AI seriously until the banks have for clients people that don't exist.
The AI programers are crazy transhumanist cultists, only comparable to the fictional adeptus mecanicus.
I can see local indie studious using Ai to create characters and props to save time and money, but not big industry players. There aint no way studios like Blizzard or Rockstar or Id will trust this shit to design an enemy for a new doom for example, or to create a very complex character models with great topology for their games. Not in the nearest 100 years.
ai is killing creativity.
I tend to disagree.
@@CGDive May I ask why? Ofc just because you have a calculator it doesnt mean that a mathematician is useless.
@@mclovin9478 You answered your own question :) The mathematician uses the calculator. A calculator (or even a computer) doesn't just make everyone a mathematician.
this is a tutorial video i guess
Tutorial/Review
Wow I've been trying off and on over the years to do 3d modeling and rigging this cuts out most the sculpting and retopology it seems
Where is ai rigging tool? 😡
haha
Hahahaha 😂
AI TOOK MAH JOB!!!
OH NOOO!!!!
Don't worry it's not that good your fine
cascadeur
Nice😊
No it isn't
5u/ per month and unlimited token to generate model should be more rational
Can This AI make Hard Surface Models?....... At least for Base/Reference Model
I didn't make good examples but watch some other videos. Some people have achieved good hard surface models.
Next Ai step: Auto Ai animations without animating.
AKA mocap? :D
actually there are text to animation solutions already.
@@CGDive OO. I forget Mocap lol XD
It's been a while since i opened Blender and my WHOLE pc so yee :)
Btw i like your video 🌟
that model it gave you looks like garbage, and I have my doubts you asked Piti for permission to use his art of the character Wuffle there.
this is an incredibly disappointing turn to see you taking and I regret giving you money in the past. I will be unsubscribing now. bye.
Your doubt is justified. I searched for a creative commons modelling sheet and that popped up.
I think you edited your reply. Please let me know if you need a refund. Happy to give it to you.
@@CGDivecreative commons usually requires attribution, just so you know. I'm not mad at you like the OP is, I just think credit isn't a big ask.
@@WannabeMarysue Oh, crap. I thought I had it in the video description. Fixed.
It is not good because I have only 10 credit😢
ai supporter? bye
you seem too eager to put me in one of your little mental boxes. bye.
@spooderderg4077 I don't understand this "pattern" that you are seeing. How are these tut guys profiting from AI? At least I find it more difficult to grow the channel and sell my courses lately which could be due to AI. I also think that AI is more likely to make tut guys obsolete, than to replace all artists.
@spooderderg4077 I see. I guess I did not understand your point initially :)
Nope, it still sucks terrible.
Tell us more.