🎹 Roland Juno D Review: The Perfect Blend of Simplicity & Power! 🎹
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- 🛒 Get the Roland Juno D8 HERE ▸www.merriammus...
🛒 Get the Roland Juno D7HERE ▸ www.merriammus...
🛒 Get the Roland Juno D6 HERE ▸www.merriammus...
💕 Subscribe to Merriam Pianos HERE ▸ bit.ly/Subscrib...
🔔 Click the 🔔 bell to be notified of all videos! ▸ bit.ly/Subscrib...
#rolandjunod#stagepianoworkstation#SynthesizerRevolution
Introduction
As a keyboard player, stepping into the world of workstations and synthesizers can feel like moving from riding a bicycle to operating a jetliner. It's a massive leap in complexity, which can often scare musicians away from exploring powerful and creative features like sequencing and sampling.
When I first heard about the Roland Juno D, I was skeptical. Another 88-note stage piano? How would this be different from Roland's already impressive lineup? But once I sat down with the Juno D, I realized it offers something unique-a perfect bridge between a stage piano and a full workstation. This makes it accessible for piano-focused musicians who want to explore advanced features without feeling overwhelmed by the complexity.
In this video, I break down the Roland Juno D, an instrument designed to grow with you. Whether you're a beginner dipping your toes into the world of synthesizers, or an experienced musician looking to explore advanced features, the Juno D has something for everyone.
What You'll Learn in This Video:
Design & Layout:
Why the Juno D feels so approachable, even for beginners.
Onboard Sounds: Dive into thousands of sounds powered by Roland's ZEN-Core engine.
Sequencing & Sampling: See how easy it is to use the built-in sequencer for live looping.
Advanced Features: Discover hidden layers of complexity for those ready to take their music to the next level.
Why the Juno D is Perfect for Musicians at All Levels
The Juno D balances simplicity and sophistication. For 90% of musicians, it offers just the right mix of ease-of-use with more advanced tools like sequencing, sampling, and multi-part performance. The ZEN-Core engine gives you access to thousands of high-quality sounds, and the layout ensures these features are never more than a button press away.
The 80/20 rule applies here: the top 20% of features that most musicians will use are right at your fingertips. There’s no need to dive deep into confusing menus to enjoy the benefits of this powerful instrument.
Key Features at a Glance:
Easily Split the Keyboard: Create multi-part scenes with the option for 8 or 16 parts.
Thousands of Sounds: Quickly access categorized sounds powered by the ZEN-Core engine, with easy push-button selection.
Drum Pads & Arpeggiator: Transform your 88 keys into drum pads with just one button. Plus, enjoy a quick-access arpeggiator and chord memory features.
Compact Sliders: A four-slider real-time mixer controls essential parts of your performance without overwhelming you. The left slider handles mic input (XLR, non-phantom powered), while the others manage phrase pads and main tracks.
Simple, Yet Powerful Control Interface
Even though the Juno D has fewer knobs and sliders than a typical workstation, it doesn’t sacrifice functionality. You get 4 easy-to-use sliders for volume control, and a simple yet powerful 4-knob interface that controls envelope shaping, cut-off, resonance, and EQ. You can even assign these knobs to adjust other parameters with a simple button press.
The display and user interface are designed for clarity, similar to Roland’s higher-end workstations. With 4-arrow navigation and a data wheel, it’s easy to find what you need, whether you’re sequencing, sampling, or adjusting settings.
Advanced Features for Experienced Musicians
For more advanced musicians, the Juno D doesn’t just stop at ease of use. Dive into the multi-effects engine, complete with individual insert effects for each part, as well as global effects like chorus, reverb, and EQ-all fully editable. You can also access the full ZEN-Core engine for more in-depth sound design, including editing the 4 partials that make up each tone.
HA-4 Weighted Action:
The 88-note version of the Juno D comes equipped with Roland’s PHA-4 action, a fully weighted keybed that’s perfect for piano players who are used to the feel of acoustic instruments. This action is a bit on the heavier side, making it ideal for those who play with intensity or come from a classical background.
Let me know in the comments if the Juno D fills the gap for you! Would this be the right mix of workstation and stage piano for your needs? Let’s talk about it below!
Connect with Merriam Music:
● Website ▸ www.merriammus...
● Contact Us ▸ www.merriammus...
● Instagram ▸ / merriammusic
● Facebook ▸ / merriammusic
● Twitter ▸ / merriammusicinc
Ok, Roland is not making things easy with their nomenclature. They already release a Juno-D in 2005. I own a Juno G. Then came Juno-Di, Juno-Gi, Juno-DS, Juno-X, and now Juno-D series D6, D7 and D8. This is getting worse than their key action names. (Not to mention a whole world of Junos before all of those.)
I can certainly understand the criticism. I think the issue is inevitable for companies that are prolific and have been around for quite sometime. Perhaps, the naming conventions will become a little less obtuse in the future.
@@MerriamPianos "Juno" as a brand name, I can understand. But repeating a model name is just confusing. Roland should harness the power of the rest of the alphabet. 😅
I've noticed they've been going back to simplified names recently: Fantom, Fantom 0, LX, GP, now Juno D with just a single digit number to distinguish between models. I think Fantom already had this issue as well with bring named after a 00s era keyboard. I get it but it makes me wonder where they'll go from here.
Also I know you said Juno makes sense as a name, but to add: Juno has also always been Roland's low/mid end general purpose synth for the different eras (named after the partner of Jupiter, their high end synth series). It's just their original ones ended up sounding so great in their own right that they're expensive now. The Juno X is an exception since its (if I'm not being charitable) nostalgia bait for the old Juno aesthetic, unfortunately without the super accurate modelling from the system 8 (which I have and reccomend) or the boutiques.
XP80 => Juno-D => Juno-D LE => Juno-Di => Juno-DS => Juno-D
The older Juno-D is still in the used market, it is still a usable instrument as most venues have pretty bad speakers that make even the newer version pretty overkill in sound quality.
Juno-G => Juno-Gi => FA-08 => Fantom-0
Your Juno-G has more features than either Juno-D, being from the midrange line instead of the entry-level line. The huge screen on the G is pretty nice, too.
Bro I have Juno Gi 61 FA61 I sold my G6 so I can get the new Fantom then a year later they dropped the EX as a board I still gonna buy the expansion but I’m gonna buy 61 version of the new D!!! This is gonna be my new aux board and small rehearsal board!!!
Brooo!! Sweetwater has this at an $850 difference from the Fantom-08 ($1299.99 vs $2,149.99). Stu MUST make a comparison video that is NO LESS than 30 minutes long!🤣
C'mon, Stu! Help me decide!!
I have Fantom 06 for production and RD-88 for piano feel. Anyways, the Fantoms also have the SuperNatural pianos and EPs, and the virtual tonewheel organ. I have a VR-730 too and if you play any Hammond organ, this is a must the Juno lacks. Stu does an excellent job demoing as always. But it really depends on what you need and can afford. The Fantom 0 series has twice what the Juno has and then some. Also check used and demos at Sweetwater and Guitar Center. I got my Fantom 06 used from GC at a very good price.
Haha I will be happy to pass on the suggestion to Stu and the production team, but I can't promise anything! There are a lot of great instruments to choose from the Roland line. That is for sure! :)
@@PatrickRosenbalm Although the ease of use is huge..I have a MODX6 and just bought the CK61 and man its way easier on stage to get what you want....I think for live performance this must be considered
@@wireguy123 I checked those out before I bought what I did. I think the Rolands are better. No slam against Yamaha, I own some of their gear too. Try before you buy if you can.
Apart from the awesome Piano reviews Stu does, we need to see more workstation and synth reviews like this!. Fantastic playing as always.
Hi! Brent here! We're glad you enjoyed it. I'll be happy to pass on the feedback to Stu and the production team. More deep dives into workstations and synths would certainly be exciting. :)
Terrific product review as always Stu! The live looping part was fabulous!
Hi! Brent here! Thanks for tuning in! We're glad you enjoyed Stu's video review/demo! :)
The Yamaha DGX670 has been the answer to my needs. This Juno D looks intimidating to me.
That is certainly fair! The DGX670 and FP-E50 have some overlapping features, but are a little bit more user friendly.
Is the video blurred at 2:03 or is his hand faster than the speed of light?
Haha it is possible that Stu is breaking the speed of light barrier. ;)
You must have like 1 week of piano playing experience 😂
Always look forward to Stu's takes on these boards. As a user of a Roland Juno DS 88 as purely midi controller for the past six years I'm only tempted by this because of the class compliant USB-C powered audio. While the sounds again are kind of mediocre like my DS you can use your iPad or anything else without drivers. Plus being able to power it over USB. The DS could use AA batteries this is nicer.
Thank you for taking the time to tune in and share your thoughts! We appreciate it immensely. :)
Thanks for the video. Is the keybed used in 88 version same as RD 88 ? If so, how the keybed reacts with the sound ? Same, lighter or heavy ?
You're very welcome! The RD88 and Juno D8 both use the PHA4 action. To that point, the overall playing experience is virtually the same.
@@MerriamPianosthanks for the reply.
I am here just to see the hair getting messier as the video goes
Stu's hair is apparently a hot topic these days. When you're into the music and grooving away, the hair will naturally do its thing!
Great overview. The D-8 has notable upgrades over the DS88, most significantly the inclusion of the PHA-4 action. I haven't put my hands on a D-6 or D-7 yet so cannot comment on the synth key action; however I loved the keys on the DS61. The ability to be powered from USB power packs is a nice addition. Some minor upgrades here and there but as someone who has owned a DS61 for years I was a bit let down that they have limited some features as well. I appreciated that you were basically getting Fantom electronics in cheaper hardware with the DS line (even though you had to menu dive to access the full power hidden in there). I agree with you though that these changes are not going to be relevant to the average buyer and it remains a top tier option.
Thank you kindly! We appreciate you taking the time to watch the video and write in with your insights. Inevitably, there are going to be some changes that fans of the predecessor models may not be a fan of, but, overall, I would say that the new JUNDO D series instruments are an exciting step forward from Roland. :)
@@MerriamPianos I want to be clear, I'm not dissing the new models :). They are solid. I'm just big on weaseling as much power as possible out of something for which I paid as little as I could. The DS line was particularly good for that as I assume Roland was just dual-purposing the Fantom chips rather than designing a different chip for the DS line. I'm not *really* the consumer they're aiming at with the Juno line, just happy to take advantage of what ended up in it for whatever reason.
Yes, the Juno DS 88 key action felt very soft and squishy, like a wet sponge - a dealbreaker. The PHA-4 is a nice keyboard action, a significant and welcome change in the Juno D 88 key.
Excellent presentation
Thank you! We appreciate you tuning in. :)
❤ mr fast fingers
I'll be happy to pass along the kind words to Stu on your behalf. :)
This competes directly (even price wise) with the Yamaha CK and personally I like this more. Especially the 88 key version, the PHA4 action is much better than the equivalent GHS.
For sure! It is an impressive instrument for the money. The PHA4 action is fantastic. :)
Thank you for the excellent review. Perhaps you have an answer: As an acoustic pianist, I’ve often wondered why the best-sounding sampled piano libraries used in DAWs almost always surpass the piano sounds found on most digital pianos and synthesizers, regardless of brand? I find them barely acceptable, even the piano sounds from the most expensive keyboards and synthesizers.
Because your computer is more powerful than digital pianos and is more capable of running high quality samples.
Vst sample libraries are also really big. For example keyscape takes up 80gb.
Vsts you usually listen through studio monitors or headphones, which usually are better quality than internal speakers of digital piano
You're welcome! Thanks for tuning in! Generally speaking, the file size, fidelity, and number of sample layers are able to be higher with VSTs than digital pianos due to the fact that personal computers are far more powerful than those onboard digital instruments. I would argue that there are a few exceptions when you get to the very top-end digital/hybrid pianos though.
@@cirisirpula152 Thank you for the feedback. I would have thought that this could have been resolved by Roland and Korg given today's advancements.
@@Beyondabsence I think Roland is using modeled pianos instead of samples. Similar to what Pianoteq is doing on vst side. That basically solves the processing power and size problems. But most companies still use samples.
@@cirisirpula152 thanks again
Are the Supernatural Pianos available for this keyboard via the expansion slots
I don't believe so. It is possible that might be a possibility later. The FANTOM-0 series instruments have access to the SuperNATURAL piano tones though.
One of the free EXZ expansions for Fantom-0 and Juno-D has a "Premier grand piano" preset that makes the middling Supernatural pianos sound dull and lifeless. Same applies to the older Juno-DS88 and FA-08 and the free Axial expansions for them.
Thanks ! That’s good to know
I meant wave expansion
:)
As a guitar player who plays the occasional KB part in rock/blues/soul cover bands, I need something that (1) has great essential piano sounds (2) EP sounds (3) Organ sounds, and (4) sounds I will need to cover songs from 60-s to 2000s. As a software developer, I have a natural desire to get the flagship FANTOM and go down the rabbit hole, but I have to accept that 90-something percent of what I will use a kb for is POSSIBLY available in the D series.
I will need more info on what kind of sounds I get OOB or easily downloadable from Roland before I can feel certain about that. I don't want to spend hours and hours tweaking kb sounds at this stage because I am not doing original music with it (yet). So far I haven't heard any demos that sound like the #1 sound I am thinking of for one of my bands. I also haven't heard the string sounds much. A lot of the demos are oriented toward electronic music players.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for watching and writing in! Given what you have described, I would personally suggest exploring instruments like the Roland RD88 EX, Roland FP-E50, and Roland FANTOM-08. These will likely be more aligned with your specific context of use.
I always enjoy Stu’s videos for all of Roland keyboards which is my preference for keyboards. He’s is good with all of the keyboards and very knowledgeable of them thanks for this video. I’m undecided between the Juno-D and RD 88. Does the Juno offer a supernatural piano as well.
Thank you kindly for tuning in! I'll be happy to share the kind words with Stu. I don't believe the SuperNATURAL piano tones are available for the JUNO D models. With that said, the FANTOM-0 models do offer those tones.
Roland Juno D lost the independently modulable serial filters that Juno DS has! For twice the boot time! And half the multitimbrality? Some serious omitions here! What would be the advantages than?
Hi there! One of the big upgrades to the D8 specifically is the inclusion of the PHA4 action. Inevitably, for players that enjoyed some of the features/functions of the predecessor models, there might be some resistance to embracing these new models.
Intimidating? Sit in front of a grand piano with Chopin's Etude in C-Major in front of you. And try to play it. Now, that's intimidating. Never mind the sheer size and weight of the grand piano. Roland Juno-D intimidating? Those Roland Juno-D don't even have music score stand to intimidate you. And you don't even have to press any buttons, just turn it on, and play the piano patch. That's it, then concentrate on music. If scrolling through preset sounds with a dial is more intimidating than a real grand piano with sheet music in front of if, then I don't really know what to tell you.
Haha that is certainly a fair assessment! The Roland JUNO D series instruments can be both daunting and user friendly depending on how granular you plan on getting with its functionality. But, I certainly understand and agree with your sentiments. :)
Whatever Junos Roland did release in the past.. synth or not, I think this product will be very successful. Why? Obviously, it’s affordable, with Zen-core engine, thousands of sounds, super simple interface and controls, yet powerful under the hood. And 8 parts, usb built in audio interface, hammer action piano keybed?!? That’s a no brainer if you ask me. And those who are constantly comparing this line of Roland product with analogue synths in the past, this is not a synthesizer. It’s a piano live performance keyboard with multiple capabilities.
Very well said! The cost to value ratio that these JUNO-D models offer (particularly the D8) is quite impressive. I think Roland has been putting out some fantastic instruments as of late. It is exciting to see what comes next from Roland. :)
It IS a subtractive synthesizer. Every workstation keyboard like this and every digital piano is.
Folks comparing this performance instrument to the antique analogue synths with a similar name of the past that are kept alive by cannibalizing other Roland synths of the same model are a very vocal minority of no consequence. Most Junos are entry-level digital sampler instruments with a wide range of sounds for all manner of stage performers in all manner of situations. They are affordable pro alternatives of Roland flagship instruments like the Fantoms. The antique analogue synths named "Juno" are also meant to be lower-cost alternatives to the old Jupiter-8 and whatever other flagship synths from back then. The synth nerds like to overlook these facts. ;)
Good review
Thanks so much! :)
Thank you for this review. This is exactly what I was hoping for this week (thinking of getting Juno-D6)
You're welcome! We're glad this worked out well timing-wise for the line of instruments that you were interested in. :)
Fun keyboard 😊
Absolutely! Thanks for tuning in! :)
I have a Juno DS88. I have not gotten into a great groove with it. I usually stick with my Yamaha DGX660. The piano and organ sounds are just way better in my opinion.
They are different instruments for different kinds of people and situations. Have you tried the Yamaha P-125 or Roland FP30X?
That is certainly fair. The DS88 is not a conventional digital piano in the same way the DGX660, FP30X, or ES120 are. There is some overlap of course, but the DS88 is intended for a different context of use.
I just hate that PHA-4 Keybed why can’t Roland just make
Everything with the PHA-50
The PHA50 is a heavier action with longer keys. It is also more costly to make. In some cases, Roland uses the PHA4 action to be able to offer an instrument at a more affordable price point, while making it more portable due to the weight and more compact enclosure size.
@@MerriamPianos Yeah, I understand, but the issue with the PHA-4 is its response. The way it bounces back is really slow compared to the PHA-50, which makes playing riffs or synth parts difficult due to the action. It feels pressing down but when it bounced back up and you press it again it just…I don’t know if you understand what I’m trying to say lol
Awesome review. How cparts can be layered please?
Thanks so much! We appreciate you tuning in. Are you referring to how many patches can be layered simultaneously or the number of layers for the sequencer?
Is the new Juno series full 16 part multitimbral? How do you use it with a DAW for 16 part recording? The SCENE mode is 8 parts, but no one is saying whether there is a dedicated 16 part multi mode.
Hi there! I believe it is 8-part multi-timbral.
@@MerriamPianos Wow that’s a bummer. I wonder why Roland did this. My old Juno Di was 16 part multitimbral and had a software editor. Perhaps Roland locked the 16 part multitimbral to the playback of midi files with the new models.
@@squeakD No, they cut it down, but in exchange, there is now per-part EQ + MFX. Junos are generally affordable alternatives to Roland's Fantoms, so they are made with less capability. It is a shame to go from the 16-part Juno-DS and Juno-Di to the 8-part Juno-D, but it is not without its advantages. Plus Roland Cloud integration, because that is Roland's thing now.
Stick to your Juno-Di, it is still an excellent keyboard and has most of the same sounds as this 2024 Juno-D. If you ever want an upgrade 88-key piano, look at the RD-88, FP30X, FP60X, or FP-10, in my opinion.
@@Jason75913 I don’t own the JunoDi anymore. Sold it several years ago. I have a Roland Fantom 06. Just think it’s odd for Roland to cut the ability of this Juno’s DAW capabilities in half compared to the previous models. All those great sounds and limited to only 8 parts via a DAW. Internal sequencer limitations tend be addressed by use of DAW’s.
JunoD8 vs PXS6000?
Thanks for the suggestion! We will do our best to tackle that comparison for you, but the JUNDO D8 and PXS6000 are different categories of instruments (synth vs portable piano). We typically compare instruments from the same category.
Well if you didn’t already know…Stu is the man!!
I'll be sure to pass on the kind words to him for you! I know he appreciates it. :)
Another Juno. Roland recently gave us Juno X, a Boutique Juno, and Roland cloud versions. The Roland SH-4D has a Juno 106 Zen core engine, The Aria J-6 has Juno presets. The Roland Fantom EX and 0 have access to Zen core versions. I think Roland needs to do something new.
It looks like a nice device but maybe it's time to try something different that isn't Juno or Jupiter related.
The tech that Roland is including on these updated models is still very much relevant and cutting edge. But, I can certainly understand the sentiment. Perhaps, we will see a more quantum leap from manufacturers in the coming years. Thanks for tuning in and sharing your thoughts! :)
@@matthewgaines10 it is just a name
Roland introduced the BMC chips in 2019. BMC stands for Behavioral Modelling Core. They use them in all their newest synths. My RD-88 has 1 BMC chip, my Fantom 06 has 2. According to Roland the top end Fantoms have 4. From what I can tell they run ZenCore, Supernatural, ACB and whatever else Roland has. Plus you can get the ZenCore software and run it on your PC. It appears to be upgradable and expandable and I would imagine they will use that tech for a while. All that will be different is the name of the gear they put the BMC chip in, the capabilities they enable it to do and how you interact with it. Even the most basic FP-10 piano has a BMC chip. Anyways, I hope the info helps. If you don't like where Roland is going, there are other brands. Nothing wrong with owning something from all of them. ;-)
@@MerriamPianos From what I can tell, about everything from Roland 2019 on runs on Roland's versatile BMC chips. One in an FP-10 to 4 in the full blown Fantoms. I think they will be using those for quite a while.
There is also Roland ZENOLOGY Pro Software Synthesizer - $230 on Sweetwater. I didn't have time to try it, but I suspect is has exactly the same sounds as Juno and Fantom. If you want to try something different, try software instruments instead of hardware. For example Steinberg Halion 7 (full version).
So its the same half baked loop sequencer as on the fantom? No arranger or linear sequencing? If you want to go further and develop a song you gotta move onto logic. So.... you might as well start in logic!
I am not sure if it is the exact same sequencer technology to be honest. It is important to note that this is a sub $2000 CAD instrument. Naturally, there will be some limitations compared to top-of-the-line workstations that cost three to four times more.
@@MerriamPianos so no note edit display?
@@christianthompson1473 None, this one is the same, cut-down sequencer found on the Juno-DS line. You record and arrange by ear alone. Most songs can work as chained loops anyway, so it is quite usable. I like it a lot, but if you must have a more traditional sequencer, Logic or Cubase are the way to go these days indeed, or a Korg Krome EX or Akai MPC One.
@@Jason75913 yes thanks for the info. I use the mpc key37... and logic. 👍
Many thanks for the review! While I am not target audience (yet), I like the features. However what surprises me that Roland consistently neglects music rests (same story with Fantom-0 for example). I get it, it is stage piano so you won't it attach it always but providing the ability (not even mentioning the rest itself) to attach it at home for practicing IMHO is the way to go. It seems according to Roland you either have to buy second keyboard (made by Roland as well I guess 🙂) or buy a stand just for the sake of attaching music rest. Providing two holes or a slot... man, Roland is stubborn.
You're welcome! Thank you so much for tuning in! I can understand the commentary about the music rest. They are generally omitted on stage pianos (by many manufacturers in fact). But, having some type of universal music rest option for these stage models would be welcomed by many users of course.
does it have scale ton ?
Hi there! Sorry - I don't understand the question.
Hi. Would it be a good idea to make a comparison video between the fantom 08 and this one? We would really appreciate actually as I am actually about to decide on one of them. I am a fan of your reviews and comparisons. Thanks for all
Hi there! Thanks for the suggestion! I'll certainly pass it along to our production team. I'm sure they will do their best to tackle a comparison video if possible. There are several other videos in the queue at the moment however.
In this keyboard master key + - feature is available? This is my a normal query but no one not answering m
While I don't have the user manual on hand, after a brief search it appears that you can adjust/transpose the Master Key.
Not too pleased with manner RUclips has expanded it's advertisement slots.
That is fair. Ads are a necessary evil I suppose.
I have a korg T1 88key if i connect the out midi in juno's midi in , i play this without problem ! Like the keyboard original ? Is possible play a piano part from the T1 KEY and play another part on the original ? I thing to buy the 6 octave version and play from T1 . Sorry for my enghish ! I m Italian ! Ciao
Yup - you could use another piano to control the sounds onboard another instrument like the JUNO D instruments via the MIDI connectivity options. :)
@@MerriamPianosok ! Thanks
Juno D vs RD 88 , an in depth comparison between them would be nice
Thanks for the suggestion! We will do our best to tackle that for you. :)
Do you know if the piano sounds in this video below can be added to Juno D like the last Juno DS?
ruclips.net/video/ZO7Qr1Uebfo/видео.htmlsi=1TzwmCdXbxzRC43q
Hi! Brent here! I am not entirely sure to be honest. Given that this is a new model, I haven't taken a full deep dive into the D8 literature yet.
I'd be surprised if they leave out user multisamples. If it is currently missing, it may be added later. People request this feature so much that it was added to Juno-DS, among other past products. Korg had to add it to several of their own products. Yamaha outright increased user memory for custom samples for their MODX+ line, and memory for user samples was already a major feature of the original MODX and MOXF keyboards.
Why only 64 polyphony according to manual?
I believe the max polyphony is 256.
@@MerriamPianos People have noticed that Roland is being deceptive with that number.
make sure you are not looking a t the info for the 2005 Juno-D instead of this 2024 Juno-D
@@MerriamPianosThanks.
@@Jason75913Thanks for the info 👍🏻
Was the sound of the keyboard taken direct from the outputs, or from a room mic?
Generally speaking, unless otherwise noted in the video, the audio is captured via line outs to ensure a transparent representation of the tone engine's sound. :)
Thanks for the reply. I am aware you usually use the line outs. It's just that the sound seems thin, maybe it's my ears. Great playing as always.
The sequencer is weak. No freeform fine-resolution recording, only quantized note recording.
The while synth is meant for speedy operation. I think sequencer the feature as is works fine if you want to jam or just get your idea down.
The JUNO D series doesn't have the same sequencing functionality and detail as workstations, but it is incredibly impressive for the money. :)
Oh wow, I'm seeing in the Reference manual that the adjustable quantization from Juno-DS line was not carried over. On the older Junos, you could set quantization to zero if you wanted none during recording.
To me this is mostly performance and not quite a workstation keyboard. And that's fine. For complete DAW-less song composition and recording capabilities, you'd need to step up to Fantom-0 at least. Roland is following the Yamaha marketing strategy of product differentiation, mostly through software. Something for every budget.
To me the piano on this sounds terrible. Plus there's absolutely none of the Supernatural sounds.So the piano on this is the most particular sound that is affected by their Supernatural piano sound Which for some reason they kept off of this. It's a shame because I really do like all the rest of the sounds that I've heard on this. But as usual Roland never gives everything you need in one product.
The JUNO D is a synthesizer opposed to a formal digital piano. At the end of the day, it all comes down to a matter of preference and subjectivity. Not every instrument will resonate with every player of course.
@@MerriamPianos I agree with you, I just think Roland could have put in at least two of those Supernatural piano sounds on it.
@@equinoxpete One of the free EXZ expansions available for Juno-D and Fantom-0 contains a "Premier Grand" piano preset that puts those Supernatural pianos to shame. But also consider that there are better alternatives for piano like FP30X, RD88, and much more. Juno-D and the Fantoms are more aimed at band players and other stage performers who want a wide variety of sounds beyond what you get in most formal digital pianos.
@@Jason75913 it would be nice just to get something that has everything that you want. Unfortunately along with great piano sounds I used to play in a band where I played Keys even though I'm a guitar player, I played keys for maybe eight songs out of the night, I like to do like the taped strings and pads have some organs etc. Thanks for getting back to me. really love your videos.
@@Jason75913 Thanks for the info.
👑🎹🎆❤🕺😅
:)