I am a competitive shooter, instructor and movie consultant and I have had the privilege of shooting literally 100s of different guns and own 127 handguns. When someone suggested I try out this gun I was skeptical but relented. I was, like most are when they get to shoot it, shocked by how well the gun shoots and light the recoil (yes I know it’s 380 but it’s the size of a gymnast). After 5 minutes of shooting it, I was stacking doubles at 7 yards, and let’s be honest, you’re not shooting this with purpose further out than 7 yards. Don’t get me wrong I’ve now spent 300 rounds getting used to it and I can put A zone shots on target at 15 and even 20 but you should only consider a gun that you can shoot accurately at 7yards and in. It feels like a toy but is an absolute keeper!!
I LOVE the BG 2.0. I always wanted a 42 slide with a frame that has a double-stack 14rd mag, but this is even better bc it’s so small but shoots as softly. I find the rear sight notch too wide. Dont like the trigger dingus. And think the mag-release is a bit too extended for a pocket gun. But I still love it.
I agree, I think this little pocket pistol fits its intended use very nicely. The only issue that I have with it is the magazines are very difficult to load to their maximum capacity. However, I do believe over time the springs will lighten up 🤞🏼. This is my new edc and my wife will eventually pick one up as well.
My wife bought one. Still prefers her Ruger Security 380. We found the 2.0 works fine with Critical Defense and American Eagle FMJ. But locked up with some rounds of Federal HST. Other channels have found functioning problems with some other brands of ammunition. Personally I found the gun works well but is too small to be comfortable in my large hands. I prefer the Sig 365-380.
Sorry to hear about your luck with your pistol. I’ve shot Armscorp, CCI Blazer, and Winchester 95 grain FMJ, without issues. Winchester Silver tip, Fiocchi, and Norma safeguard JHP also all fed well.
Thanks for the review. I didn’t shoot it but held it in my hand and that thing sure is tiny. I don’t know how they fit 10 rounds in that magazine even though it’s only a 380. I totally agree with you. I can’t tell you how many CC classes I’ve been to where guys show up with these big fancy guns with laser this and light that. It’s clear that they can’t possibly be carrying such a gun on a daily basis. But a free country I guess.
I’m sure he’s saying they feed well. But in the BG 2.0 FB group, we’ve had a few guys with issues shooting the Lehigh bullets (underwood extreme defenders).
I EDC in the pocket always, I carry the Canik Mete MC 9 or the 2.0 I use the Desantis superfly the holster stays in and does come out of the pocket. The superfly has a flap that Velcro on so I can adjust it to have easy access and stays in the pocket better
@@elkwtz agreed, I have the same and works great. DeSantis said they will be providing their leather criss cross holster for the BG 2.0 sometime in the next couple weeks, which I will be purchasing because that is my preferred method to carry.
Good review. I carry a Glock 42 or a Ruger Security 380 when I carry 380. The SMITH & WESSON BODYGUARD 2.0 is a tad too small for me. Thank for the video.
Any idea if the sight dovetails are the same dimensions as the original Bodyguard 380? I prefer 3-dots and a square notch and those are already on the market for the original model.
I wish I had the same good experience. Smith and Wesson has had my Bodyguard 2.0 for a month due to numerous failure to feed issues after 400-500 rounds of various ammo. I cleaned/oiled and polished the feed ramp to no avail. At this point I would not recommend the firearm based on my experience. I would wait until Smith has updated the faulty lot of Bodyguard 2.0 that I and others have experienced.
Sorry you went through that. I tell everybody the ONLY pocket .380 I know of/have owned that doesn't jam more than 1 out of every 100 rounds is the KelTec P-3AT (released back in 2003).
@@kevinrichardson8859the front sight is offset to the right. Lots of them have the “ shoots left “ issue. Mine did. My local gunsmith centered it and I’m on bullseye now
@@kevinrichardson8859Multiple people having issues with the G42, G43 & G36 because Glock single stacks suck at reliable feeding. P365 & P238 don't feed Underwood/JHP reliably.
The BG 2.0’s size is both a positive and a negative. Its size makes it super easy to conceal and carry, but if you have pretty big/meaty hands, it can be really difficult to hold really well for shooting. Personally, I wear large gloves, but my hands are not beefy, so holding and shooting the BG 2.0 is pretty easy. I would definitely handle one in person, to see how it fits your hand, as opposed to ordering one online, and shipping it to your FFL.
Wait ‘till you shoot one. From a seated, braced position at 25 yards I hit a 12” tall 8” wide steel target twice out of 22 rounds. The rear sight is so wide you could drive a bus through it, coupled with a sight radius that’s positively tiny, and a trigger pull that’s longer than you would expect, I would say this is more of a contact/belly gun than any kind of a gun with which you can be accurate.
@@warbuzzard7167 25 yards is a bit much for a bad breath back off pocket pistol. And for .380 ballistics. Not really going to be making sure the front sight is perfectly centered in the back sight. More point and shoot. I’ve put over 300 rds through mine and it’s works great for the intended purpose IMO. And the small size means I’ll take it with me.
@@tombazemore1098 I agree with your general approach- but yesterday I established conclusively that the pistol is highly repeatable but highly inaccurate; the sights drive you 3” left (in a relatively small group) at a measured 10 yards. The problem is clearly a sight problem, and every firearm should at least shoot to point of aim without windage issues. Yes, at contact to 7 yards, it won’t make much of a difference, but coupled with stress and adrenaline, the leftward bias could make the difference between ending a fight and losing one.
@@tombazemore1098At 100m a 380 is near the velocity of a lot of standard pressure 38spc or 32acp at the muzzle, and a center mass hold should drop into the pelvic girdle. It should still do sufficient penetration with the hollow point acting like ball. The main limiting factor of a 380 pistol is ergonomics.
It has the older finish on it that was nearly bulletproof. Don't know why they changed to the DLC crap that isn't 1/10 what the old frying pan finish was except for bean-counter cost cutting. It's nowhere near as durable.
I have both, and the difference between them when shooting them back to back is night and day. BG 2.0 has less felt recoil, shoots flatter, and is much more pleasant to shoot. My LCP Max slaps the crap out of my trigger finger, making me not want to shoot more than a mag or two through it. I don’t have that problem with the BG 2.0.
Purchased new Bodyguard 2.0 and it failed to cycle. S&W has failed to stand behind their product. Still no explanation or replacement after over five weeks.
Goes to show that what works for thee may not work for me. I went through 2 Glock 42’s that wouldn’t consistently chamber or cycle. Couldn’t get rid of them fast enough
The only Glocks known for consistent feeding failures are the single stack models: G42, G43, G43X, G36. Obviously Glock nailed only the double stack design.
@@yourmomma2995 I have 4 other Glocks. All double stacks and never an issue. I suspect it’s a user/design issue. I’ve had good success with my 43X so it’s probably something to do with my hand size/technique.
Do your Bodyguard 2.0 magazines easily load to full capacity? How about the G42? Are the Glock magazines easy to load to full capacity? How about racking the slide on a full mag; Is the first round picked up and chambered correctly on both guns? Do full magazines easily insert and lock without having to slap them into place? How about ejecting a full mag? Do the magazines easily drop without having to be yanked out? I'm assuming the recoil spring assembly isn't jamming, causing the gun to lock up and not eject a live round. Anyway, any of the problems above should be a deal breaker for a carry gun. People are reporting having these problems... If you aren't, that's great.
It's too bad that S&W released this pistol with a misaligned front sight and magazines with defective followers. For a pistol at this price I would expect better quality. These problems are fairly easy to fix. See other RUclipsrs for solutions.
I have no idea why in the world anyone would want a Glock 42 there are plenty of 9 mm handguns The same size as the Glock 42 or even smaller with more capacity and cheaper so again why anyone would want a Glock 42 I don't know what they need three think life on that one
arthritis in wrists, easier to shoot accurately, faster follow up shots. i have had some small 9's that just plain suck to shoot. i cant see why anyone would want a small 9 over a .380 other than ammo price.
Because the Glock 42 is smaller than any micro 9s and shoots like a full sized competition gun. It’s accurate and there’s barely any recoil. I’d take the little size increase and limited capacity if I can make 6 out of 6 hits at 20 yards. I could barely hit anything with the bodyguard 2.0 at 7 yards. Need a loy more practice with it. If you have other Glocks, the 42 would be like 2nd nature.
@@yourmomma2995 yes, but that’s just me. Wait till you can rent one on your range and try it out. It might be on for you. Or at least dry fire it and see if you can keep it steady when pulling the trigger.
Well, the one I bought doesn't work! This little pistol didn't strike the primer hard enough to go bang. It's on it's way back to SW. I don't think this pistol is all it's cracked up to be. WAY TOO MUCH HYPE!!!! WAY TOO MANY POSITIVE POSTS. BE CAREFUL PEOPLE. NOT RELIABLE FOR SELF DEFENCE. DON'T BUY THIS ONE UNLESS YOU HAVE COMPLETELY CHECKED IT OUT.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
I have owned one for a month now and love it.
I am a competitive shooter, instructor and movie consultant and I have had the privilege of shooting literally 100s of different guns and own 127 handguns. When someone suggested I try out this gun I was skeptical but relented. I was, like most are when they get to shoot it, shocked by how well the gun shoots and light the recoil (yes I know it’s 380 but it’s the size of a gymnast). After 5 minutes of shooting it, I was stacking doubles at 7 yards, and let’s be honest, you’re not shooting this with purpose further out than 7 yards.
Don’t get me wrong I’ve now spent 300 rounds getting used to it and I can put A zone shots on target at 15 and even 20 but you should only consider a gun that you can shoot accurately at 7yards and in.
It feels like a toy but is an absolute keeper!!
I LOVE the BG 2.0.
I always wanted a 42 slide with a frame that has a double-stack 14rd mag, but this is even better bc it’s so small but shoots as softly.
I find the rear sight notch too wide. Dont like the trigger dingus. And think the mag-release is a bit too extended for a pocket gun. But I still love it.
Thanx for putting a lighter background. That's what people who post firearm videos forget. Also, great video and commentary.
I agree, I think this little pocket pistol fits its intended use very nicely. The only issue that I have with it is the magazines are very difficult to load to their maximum capacity. However, I do believe over time the springs will lighten up 🤞🏼. This is my new edc and my wife will eventually pick one up as well.
Even if there is a problem loading them to full capacity 10 & 12....even still 9+1 & 11+1 is a decent capacity for this size and weight firearm!!!!
500 flawless rounds through mine. And yes, the mags do get easier to load with use.
Get a mag loader no issues over here.
@@UncleGunz83 I have one, but it’s still on the difficult side. This isn’t a bad point with this pistol just a hurdle.
@@kevinrichardson8859 the 10 I can fully load, but the 12 I can only get 11 for now. I know in time it’ll be much easier.
Liked the sticky holster for the LCP Max. But Alabama Holster makes a nice kydex unit for this one. And it prints less than the soft ones.
My wife bought one. Still prefers her Ruger Security 380. We found the 2.0 works fine with Critical Defense and American Eagle FMJ. But locked up with some rounds of Federal HST. Other channels have found functioning problems with some other brands of ammunition. Personally I found the gun works well but is too small to be comfortable in my large hands. I prefer the Sig 365-380.
Funny how each gun is different. For me Critical Defense was the only ammo I had trouble with. And like you, I prefer my 365-380.
Sorry to hear about your luck with your pistol. I’ve shot Armscorp, CCI Blazer, and Winchester 95 grain FMJ, without issues. Winchester Silver tip, Fiocchi, and Norma safeguard JHP also all fed well.
Thanks for the review
Thanks for the review. I didn’t shoot it but held it in my hand and that thing sure is tiny. I don’t know how they fit 10 rounds in that magazine even though it’s only a 380.
I totally agree with you. I can’t tell you how many CC classes I’ve been to where guys show up with these big fancy guns with laser this and light that. It’s clear that they can’t possibly be carrying such a gun on a daily basis. But a free country I guess.
Good review 👍
These work really well with the Lehigh Defense ammo.
What do you mean they work very well with the Lehigh defense ammo? Have you had to use yours in defense? Or are you talking about feed and function?
@@kevinrichardson8859 Feed and function, yes.
I’m sure he’s saying they feed well. But in the BG 2.0 FB group, we’ve had a few guys with issues shooting the Lehigh bullets (underwood extreme defenders).
Yes, they feed and function well in range sessions for us.
I EDC in the pocket always, I carry the Canik Mete MC 9 or the 2.0 I use the Desantis superfly the holster stays in and does come out of the pocket. The superfly has a flap that Velcro on so I can adjust it to have easy access and stays in the pocket better
@@elkwtz agreed, I have the same and works great. DeSantis said they will be providing their leather criss cross holster for the BG 2.0 sometime in the next couple weeks, which I will be purchasing because that is my preferred method to carry.
Good review. I carry a Glock 42 or a Ruger Security 380 when I carry 380. The SMITH & WESSON BODYGUARD 2.0 is a tad too small for me. Thank for the video.
Any idea if the sight dovetails are the same dimensions as the original Bodyguard 380? I prefer 3-dots and a square notch and those are already on the market for the original model.
I wish I had the same good experience. Smith and Wesson has had my Bodyguard 2.0 for a month due to numerous failure to feed issues after 400-500 rounds of various ammo. I cleaned/oiled and polished the feed ramp to no avail. At this point I would not recommend the firearm based on my experience. I would wait until Smith has updated the faulty lot of Bodyguard 2.0 that I and others have experienced.
Sorry you went through that. I tell everybody the ONLY pocket .380 I know of/have owned that doesn't jam more than 1 out of every 100 rounds is the KelTec P-3AT (released back in 2003).
Sorry to hear about your experience mine works flawlessly just shoots to the left a bit from the factory
@wizkaqueefa9003 you must have missed the Sig P238 and the Glock 42??
@@kevinrichardson8859the front sight is offset to the right. Lots of them have the “ shoots left “ issue. Mine did. My local gunsmith centered it and I’m on bullseye now
@@kevinrichardson8859Multiple people having issues with the G42, G43 & G36 because Glock single stacks suck at reliable feeding. P365 & P238 don't feed Underwood/JHP reliably.
Check out the pocket holster launched for the BG 2.0 by QVO Tactical. Really slick. Great video!
Can you take a look at a sar9c?
The BG 2.0’s size is both a positive and a negative. Its size makes it super easy to conceal and carry, but if you have pretty big/meaty hands, it can be really difficult to hold really well for shooting. Personally, I wear large gloves, but my hands are not beefy, so holding and shooting the BG 2.0 is pretty easy. I would definitely handle one in person, to see how it fits your hand, as opposed to ordering one online, and shipping it to your FFL.
I also have both and will try to sell the G42. To me, the mini M&P is better.
Wait ‘till you shoot one. From a seated, braced position at 25 yards I hit a 12” tall 8” wide steel target twice out of 22 rounds. The rear sight is so wide you could drive a bus through it, coupled with a sight radius that’s positively tiny, and a trigger pull that’s longer than you would expect, I would say this is more of a contact/belly gun than any kind of a gun with which you can be accurate.
@@warbuzzard7167 25 yards is a bit much for a bad breath back off pocket pistol. And for .380 ballistics. Not really going to be making sure the front sight is perfectly centered in the back sight. More point and shoot. I’ve put over 300 rds through mine and it’s works great for the intended purpose IMO. And the small size means I’ll take it with me.
@@tombazemore1098 I agree with your general approach- but yesterday I established conclusively that the pistol is highly repeatable but highly inaccurate; the sights drive you 3” left (in a relatively small group) at a measured 10 yards. The problem is clearly a sight problem, and every firearm should at least shoot to point of aim without windage issues. Yes, at contact to 7 yards, it won’t make much of a difference, but coupled with stress and adrenaline, the leftward bias could make the difference between ending a fight and losing one.
@@tombazemore1098At 100m a 380 is near the velocity of a lot of standard pressure 38spc or 32acp at the muzzle, and a center mass hold should drop into the pelvic girdle. It should still do sufficient penetration with the hollow point acting like ball. The main limiting factor of a 380 pistol is ergonomics.
That Glock at 10:22 doesn't look like its been shot alot..how many rounds do you consider ALOT??? I guess alot is relative
It has the older finish on it that was nearly bulletproof. Don't know why they changed to the DLC crap that isn't 1/10 what the old frying pan finish was except for bean-counter cost cutting. It's nowhere near as durable.
I sorta like the lcp MAX
I have both, and the difference between them when shooting them back to back is night and day. BG 2.0 has less felt recoil, shoots flatter, and is much more pleasant to shoot. My LCP Max slaps the crap out of my trigger finger, making me not want to shoot more than a mag or two through it. I don’t have that problem with the BG 2.0.
I agree completely@@echosierra9990
Purchased new Bodyguard 2.0 and it failed to cycle. S&W has failed to stand behind their product. Still no explanation or replacement after over five weeks.
Did you contact s&w?
Goes to show that what works for thee may not work for me. I went through 2 Glock 42’s that wouldn’t consistently chamber or cycle. Couldn’t get rid of them fast enough
The only Glocks known for consistent feeding failures are the single stack models: G42, G43, G43X, G36. Obviously Glock nailed only the double stack design.
@@wizkaqueefa9003that must be your experience..my single stack Glocks run fine
stange i have never had any hic-ups with the 42 or any other glock.
@@yourmomma2995 me either
@@yourmomma2995 I have 4 other Glocks. All double stacks and never an issue. I suspect it’s a user/design issue. I’ve had good success with my 43X so it’s probably something to do with my hand size/technique.
its closer to 12oz when you have a mandatory mag in it.
Wow I thought it would be much smaller than the 42 well that sucks
Do your Bodyguard 2.0 magazines easily load to full capacity? How about the G42? Are the Glock magazines easy to load to full capacity? How about racking the slide on a full mag; Is the first round picked up and chambered correctly on both guns? Do full magazines easily insert and lock without having to slap them into place? How about ejecting a full mag? Do the magazines easily drop without having to be yanked out? I'm assuming the recoil spring assembly isn't jamming, causing the gun to lock up and not eject a live round. Anyway, any of the problems above should be a deal breaker for a carry gun. People are reporting having these problems... If you aren't, that's great.
It's too bad that S&W released this pistol with a misaligned front sight and magazines with defective followers. For a pistol at this price I would expect better quality. These problems are fairly easy to fix. See other RUclipsrs for solutions.
Front sight was good on mine. But that's probably down to whichever assembly tech mounted the sights. And after 2-300 rounds the mags seem fine too.
Omg a 300 dollar that you have to adjust !!! Bwahahahahaaha poverty much!!! Don’t carry it’s to expensive for you maybe a Hi Point
No problem with mine and I own 3
Every new gun that comes out is claimed to be better than the last. Hickhok 45 loved the Ruger max and now he loves this
Running anything other than FMJs through a .380 gun with that short a barrel is likely a waste of money.
Not really. There's a handful of modern 380 defensive rounds that'll penetrate 12+ inches and still expand/cavitate very well.
I have no idea why in the world anyone would want a Glock 42 there are plenty of 9 mm handguns The same size as the Glock 42 or even smaller with more capacity and cheaper so again why anyone would want a Glock 42 I don't know what they need three think life on that one
arthritis in wrists, easier to shoot accurately, faster follow up shots. i have had some small 9's that just plain suck to shoot. i cant see why anyone would want a small 9 over a .380 other than ammo price.
Did you have a stroke writing that?
Because the Glock 42 is smaller than any micro 9s and shoots like a full sized competition gun. It’s accurate and there’s barely any recoil. I’d take the little size increase and limited capacity if I can make 6 out of 6 hits at 20 yards. I could barely hit anything with the bodyguard 2.0 at 7 yards. Need a loy more practice with it. If you have other Glocks, the 42 would be like 2nd nature.
@@peds103 do you own a BG 2.0? i am right on the edge of ordering one, but if it doesn't shoot as well as the g42 i may back out.
@@yourmomma2995 yes, but that’s just me. Wait till you can rent one on your range and try it out. It might be on for you. Or at least dry fire it and see if you can keep it steady when pulling the trigger.
Well, the one I bought doesn't work! This little pistol didn't strike the primer hard enough to go bang. It's on it's way back to SW. I don't think this pistol is all it's cracked up to be. WAY TOO MUCH HYPE!!!! WAY TOO MANY POSITIVE POSTS. BE CAREFUL PEOPLE. NOT RELIABLE FOR SELF DEFENCE. DON'T BUY THIS ONE UNLESS YOU HAVE COMPLETELY CHECKED IT OUT.
This is awkward. Just post the video when you have it completed.
I own this gun. Its complete garbage!
$400 paperweight!
@@yukoncornilias7013why?
I own this gun and haven’t had any issues