I'd fold. Hero has next to nothing invested in the hand. Why navigate a turn re-raise and river bet when the hand already looks very fishy and potentially an angle.
@@CrushlivePoker just fold and move on, it’s obvious the guy had a boat. The caller whined because he fell for it and paid off when he should have just folded to the raise and laughed at how the guy saved him money.
This isn't even an angle as you mention at the end. The guy probably just actually checked out of turn thinking nobody has anything or lookin to X/R. But then BB bets and he knows he clearly has something so he raises. I guess this take makes me braindead uh ohhhhh!
Why did this know it all even bother calling in? Literally messed up every street. Changed the action to where the only thing villain couldn’t do was check 😂. It may not even of been an angle, he could have got all giddy lost when he turned the boat and thought he was first to act, looking to check raise. I would think a checking angle would induce more checks, and risking checking it around with the hope that someone catches a flush is costing money. Ps, the floor didn’t want to talk to that guy because he sounds like a pain in the a$$.
honestly even i, as a relative novice was thinking, that the guys has a two pair then a boat the whole time. it does raise the question about how to handle these sorts of players - they do something when they have the hand once, it works and then they do it when they don't have the hand. everyone wants to win, but sometimes making a friend who has your back in the parking lot if shit goes south is worth more than gold.
I agree with you. The action was changed. The Villian gets to raise. That is the rule in the casino card room I play at. At low stakes, most plays aren't smart enough to angle. They are just stupid or bad or both.
T =13:45. " I don't know why they don't cover that in the rule .. " What kind of poker ' expert ' are you, Mr. Blogger ? ? ? Of COURSE it is covered in rules. ' Action out of turn is binding unless action to you changes ' is a standard rule....
I agree with Bart. He could be doing this with a boat too , I tend not not to read into situations like this too much , cause they are to easy manipulate into what you want your opponent to think , which then pretty much makes them meaningless. I can’t remember an exact scenario, but I’m pretty sure I’ve called over a floor before in a situation similar to make my opponent think I was Capped too. When I wasn’t. There are obviously more betting rounds to come , plus sometimes you just want an exact ruling as to the rules , has nothing to do with your hand and whether you are perceived as strong or weak. I agree generally most people wouldn’t call over floor with a boat , but like I said it’s too easy to manipulate your perceived range after that , that putting to much thought into that is probably just a waste of time. Plus you can usually tell if your opponent is the type that would try and mess with your opinion. If he is , than him calling the floor just becomes meaningless , if he’s just a casual player than yes it could lean my decision, but if it’s a player that has experience I wouldn’t put much thought into it In a side note , I like how caller says he wants to punish the player by beating him in the hand. lol. That’s the opposite way of punishing him. You punish this type of player by basically snap folding your hand and thank him for giving g away the strength of his hand.
I agree with niki. No chance he calls floor if he has a book. Let's be honest 99% of players aren't trying to be ethical or do what's 100% right according to rhe rules...they're trying to win $. Why would you call the floor if someone wants to donate you more $ ? To be more ethical?
@@Fred-rg5vwcaller really shouldn’t have any boats here anyways , but it’s live poker so who the heck knows. I guess he could have 6s full , but obviously as we find out later he can’t have that.
@@Womenandwine Yes as someone else posted it most likely wasn't an angle at all. He just got excited to slow play when he hit is 2 outta. If it was an angle it doesn't really make any sense anyway..not gaining much if anything. Had position and a small bet was always gonna be called...mighta even induced a raise.
I do agree with the caller that at these stakes, calling the floor caps your range. There are very few players with the wherewithal to call floor with a monster hand in this scenario, at low stakes.
That's all I agree with, though. Calling the floor over an angle is wild and gives the guy exactly the reaction his scummy little ego wants. I agree with Bart, show him the nut flush and tell him you'd have raised him for sure if not for his action on the turn and he cost himself a few hundred. Make sure he knows that he's so bad that he knows he needed a 1 out turn (because the other 6 costs the hero nothing, he just folds) into a 9 out river to even get the pitiful pot he did get in a disgusting cooler hand.
Yes. Bart, who is usually always right, is 100% wrong on this. If you call the floor, there is no way you have quads or a full boat. Unless you yourself are an absolute idiot. Just re-raise the guy and get more money in there. You know he’s got a strong hand and you’ve got him toasted.
@@Vipr77 Would that make it acceptable for someone not involved in the hand to call the floor after the obvious angle shoot once he raises after checking out of turn? Or do we still follow the rule that if you're not involved in the hand, you stay silent even if you observe another playing doing a really scummy angle shoot?
@@gabrielrockman Up to judgment of course.....but I am the guy who calls the floor in this scenario out of the hand. I hate this garbage. I'd be conflicted but likely call floor for the sake of integrity. I've taken heat in the past for this but I do it anyway. I just hate anglers.
This caller is out of his mind. What does he think the floor was going to do? What does he think the cameras would show? Aside from warning the angler to cut the crap, there’s nothing else they can do, because here’s the thing about angles - they’re not against the rules. They’re sleazy ways to take advantage of the rules, but they aren’t cheating. This guy was pissy because he knew he got angled, he let it happen, and his response to that is to complain about it to the floor? I am not suppprting the angle shooter at all, but at you have to take responsibility for yourself at the poker table. Complaining that the floor didn’t bail him out after he lost that hand is as weak as it gets.
At the end caller says to “check the cameras”. Even if the cameras caught the action, they can't discern intent. The cameras don’t know whether it was an innocent mistake by the guy, or whether he purposely acted out of turn. Could it have been an angle? Sure. But the caller still sounds like he thinks the world is out to get him.
Or any raise... You don't need to say re-... same with somebody telling a story and saying 'cold call' etc... another annoying thing is when a player gets raised heads up on the river and acts annoyed like the raiser did something personally wrong, or played their hand like a moron (just because a player caught them) - another one, this happened a ton in the early-mid 2000's... A player would be raised on the turn or river and would call time and look up and mouth words like "look at me, I'm strategizing and openly showing everybody that I'm thinking" then shaking their head in disguist and sarcastically saying "nice hand" "if you want if that bad, go ahead..."
Some people consider checking as "betting $0" So a check, and then a bet Is really a bet, and then a raise Don't worry, I am not one of the people. Lol
This is my thought. If I had the nuts with the pocket Js, I'd absolutely call the floor and then if they agreed with him, act like I just went on tilt and start throwing money in. Angle the dude right back. Regardless, if you thought you might be getting angled, huge mistake to bet on the turn. Just check. It makes him check too. See the free card. You can still bet river if you want to.
I feel for the caller, and I agree with the caller (disagree with Bart) that calling the floor in the middle of the hand gives away info on your hand. However, playing the hand out and then whining about it with the floor and the manager when you lose isn't a good look either. Plus, it could have just been a legitimate mistake. The other player could have checked with the intention to check raise, but then realized it wasn't his turn.
where i play, if you check out of turn you are not allowed to raise to any ensuing bet. (ie: you're not allowed to take any kind of aggressive action (bet or raise) if you performed a defensive action out of turn). any cardroom that doesn't have this rule just invites the kind of abuse described in this video
This seems like the kind of thing that derives from people who think check raising itself is immoral. It’s not as if someone couldn’t honestly want to check, or raise.
@@mikemck4796obviously nothing wrong with check-raising. but checking out of turn to induce a bet in order to then raise is an angle-shoot. and where i play, it is simply not allowed. if you check out of turn, you cannot bet or raise when it comes back to you, you can only check or call.
I get that the caller is frustrated, but the evidence this is an angle is weak. It's a $90 pot and holding 66 is an easy check on pretty much any turn, he might of just been on autopilot and didn't register the 6 in time. People check out of turn a lot, it stinks when it impacts action but that's kind of unavoidable. In fact, I cannot buy that this guy processed within one second that, "you know what I'm going to do? I hit my 6, I'm going to check out of turn, make it look weak, hope he bets, and then get him with a check raise." That's quite farfetched even for a scummy dude. He also handicaps himself because he takes away his own ability to bet if you check up front. But even *if* he was angling, what is the floor supposed to do after the hand? You still bet the turn, you called the raise, and you called the river. Sure, cameras can see everything but this doesn't meet any reasonable standard of clear intent and illegal action, and the alleged angle was multiple decision points in the past. I wish Bart's whole framing of this video were different, from "that guy is scum" to "look caller, here's a bit of advice."
Bart is crazy to think that the nuts is going to call the floor over and risk having a raise taken away. Caller is crazy to think about check-raising a flush on the river. Villain has spent this hand thinking about how to angle the caller, lots of boats in his range.
This was NOT an angle and the Villain in all likelihood had 66 when he does this, and what advantage is the villain even getting by doing this? I see this particular mistake a lot and everyone flips out and always assumes it's an angle but what advantage is the "angler" getting by checking out of turn when he has a made hand? Yes maybe it somewhat encourages the hero to bet but if the hero checks the "angler" is now forced to check behind. This scenario stinks for the villain. And as for it encouraging the hero to bet, considering every single time someone checks out of turn the entire table always starts saying "omg angle" I'm not even sure if it does encourage the hero to bet more often,.... it might even encourage a check more often. Psychology 101. Villain spikes his 2 outer, gets excited and "aggressively slow-plays" . You just get excited and want to do something, most bad players first instinct is to slowplay, so you just start checking even though it's not your turn. It's the same process that makes a baseball pitcher throw the ball to first base on a hard comebacker at 100mph even though he has all day to make the throw, the adrenaline rush of the ball coming hard at you that you just caught. This check out of turn is almost never an angle, and the villain is heavily weighted towards 66 as soon as it happens.
Exactly right. I think its more likely a bad player that wants to check raise a pro or for-profit whiner, and gets alittle ahead of himself by checking out of turn, than an angler. Also, the only way this "angle" works is if you do it against someone that will call the raise because they are too emotional in their decision making. By the caller's explanation of why he called the turn, looks like the villian found the perfect sucker.
First - this is room dependent, so no harm in asking. I have seen rooms where the player is only allowed to call/fold - he can't raise when he checks out of turn. (right or wrong, there needs to be SOMETHING to make people conscious of betting in turn) I don't think it caps the range at all...even if you don't have the presence of mind to angle the angler here, I'd call the floor to make sure it's allowed, first to remove any doubt of the validity of the action in that hand (If I do have the nuts I don't want the floor doing something stupid after the fact, get the ruling in real time), and second to know for next time. It also puts everyone on alert about this clown. I would call the floor with JJ in this hand.
Hero changed action by betting, villain gets all options again. This happens pretty often and is a pretty standard ruling. calling the floor wouldn’t have helped you and yes it would have told (at least me) that you didn’t have a J
FYI, at Bay 101 across the street, the rule is that if you check out a turn you absolutely cannot raise even if the action changes and your options are only call or fold. Checking is the only option out of turn where when action changes it doesn't give you all of the options back specifically at Bay 101 and they probably use the same rule at matrix. I dealt poker at Bay 101 for almost 4 years and this rule was implemented because people were checking out a turn on the button pretending that they thought they were first to act, then raising after somebody bets.
@@charlesnewborn3760This should be the the standard rule no need to reward an angler. If the check out of turn is an honest mistake then you should be forced to honor said check or call a bet. You should absolutely lose the option to raise.
@@charlesnewborn3760yet another reason to NEVER play poker in California. It really speaks volumes when you need rules implemented like that to the character of the average Californian 😂
@@jacobbirkenfeld9261 Oh PLEASE, this has nothing to do with California people; it has to do with the nature of poker players in general. Poker players arent the most honest of individuals on average I mean the game itself promotes lying. I play poker all over the US and out of all the places I played, California has some of the more nicer poker players. Florida was the worst.
actually no you are wrong. non aggressive action out of turn only has non aggressive action when option comes to them. You can not check out of turn and then raise. only option is fold or call.
Oh my word, I love it when people check out of turn. Gives me so much more information. In this case, it clearly showed the angle and it became a trivial fold on the turn. The caller let revenge mode get the best of . And it cost additional money. Just fold, thanks for the free information and moved to the next hand.
Obviously not a bluff. I’ve seen that move too many times, they always have the nuts. They x because they think no one has anything. As soon as they see you betting the raise comes in. Might not be even planned. Just the way they think
I thought this guy was talking about me for a second. I hit a boat on the turn and I was so exited to slow play it. Hoping for a flush to come on the river, so I can stack anybody with a flush draw and jacks. When I did this, I was not trying to angle anyone. I just did it because I was too excited to slow play a full house. That might have been the case. Anytime a player is too interested in a board or act out of turn, it is usually a tell that they have the best hand.
I think this guy has called before. Bart labeled it as the worst play of all time. Believe ii was a 2,3,5,10 game at bay 101. Could be mistaken, but he sounds similar with same kind of attitude
This call was frustrating to listen to, because Bart missed the mark on a caller that could use a lot of constructive criticism, and Bart is usually spot on with situations like this that arise all the time at low stakes. Here is what I would have said if I was Bart: 1) Don't play with emotion. You don't call the guy on the turn because you "want to beat him". That is a losing player mentality. 2) A player will always have all options after checking out of turn IF the in-turn player then bets. The action has changed. This is standard. I'm not suggesting the caller should have checked the turn necessarily, because people check out of turn all the time at low stakes, and that alone is not an indicator that you're being angled. 3) Yeah, what he did was an angle, but it's not an effective one. He's giving away a ton of info by pulling this. Low stakes players do not often angle a check so they can raise a combo draw on a paired board. 4) The second reason to fold the turn is because you have a flush draw on a paired board vs an opponent that is screaming strength and offering you bad pot odds. Implied odds don't help here because you don't even have the nut draw. This should be made obvious by the fact that the caller check-called the river after hitting his flush. If you knew you weren't going to be able to raise the river (again, paired board, opponent screaming strength) why call getting bad odds on the turn? This points back to my #1. Emotion. The caller got mad at the angler, and did exactly what the angler was hoping. Congrats, you got played. 5) Bart mentioned this at the end, but it's entirely plausible that the "angler" didn't even intend to angle at all. He turns a boat, and plans to check if no one bets, hoping they river a flush and go crazy. He's excited and acting too quickly. But oh, look, someone leads out! "Ok, time to raise!" This is a far simpler explanation for what happened. 6) Don't get me wrong, I'm not simping for M8trix here, or their floormen particularly. If you want to get mad at the floor, do it because they put people at the top of the wait list when you tip them well upon sign up (at least, that's what they did 5 years ago when I last played there). There is nothing the floor could, would, or even should have done here. The only recourse you have when someone checks out of turn is to force them to check when checked to, and it's your responsibility as a player to make sure that happens. If it doesn't, THAT is when the floor can do something. 7) Don't expect everyone to play by the code of conduct you hold yourself to, and don't get upset and thrown off your game when they don't. It will happen. It's your job as a winning player to not let that affect your ability to make profitable decisions.
Exactly. I play full time. People angle and people make mistakes. I’d never call the floor over that. Keep them happy is the #1 priority. After making $ 😂
I think there is a small possibility that it wasn't an angle. He could have the intent to slow play and legitimately check out of turn, but then decide to raise after you bet because at that point he has reason to believe you have a hand. It's possible that the action of betting legitimately changed his decision. That said, it probably was an angle. I just don't believe it's 100% conclusive.
If the rule at the casino is that if the action changes, the player that acted out of turn has all options, then the floor did nothing wrong. It’s not guaranteed it was an angle. Guy could have just been going for a checkraise. If you’re aware of the possibility it’s an angle, then you actually have an advantage by him acting out of turn, sine his options are now limited and yours are not. In summary: bad call (in both senses)
So if someone checks out of turn and someone else bets.,, the original checker only supposed to call a bet? I assume once a bet is made the person who checked out of turn can raise if they want.
At crown Casino in Australia if you 3 bet the preflop and take it down, they would still take $9 from you, as there was already $60 in the pot + your call of 30. They don't tax your raise. Pretty crazy
If they are loose, you should 3bet always! The problem with 3bets is vs tight open range, that dominates your 3bet range/a lot of 4bet bluffs. A9s is a mix, but vs the stated pool it is definitely a winning 3bet.
13:10 i agree w/ caller that trying to deny/challenge the turn raise would make your own hand be perceived as weak, especially when you only bet 1/3 pot already.
A. This likely wasn't even an angle: Villian's "angling" line makes sense if he thinks that Hero checked and is going for a X/R or just thinks nobody has anything.. and then when Hero bets he changes course. B. Callers argument is "I knew this guy was angling me but I gave him my money anyways, wahhhh" boo hoo to caller
NJ/PA/MD any poker room any floor will tell you that the raise is allowed. They would give him a warning to not check out of turn but his option to raise is there after you bet because you changed the action. Caller made a mistake by not 3b flop and by leading turn. If I’m not 3b pre then I’m definitely just x this turn multiway. What are you trying to get called by? Gutters? Worse Ax that you will chop with on a lot of rivers?
I wanted to hear what the manager said, since the caller stated that the manager saw everything, as if it had bearing on the outcome. (Caller said that the floor was the one trying to rationalize, not the manager.)
Just to answer the caller’s question yes you could do that as an angle yourself if you had a nutted hand. I’ve pulled something similar about 10 years ago, when I wasn’t as strict about angling etiquette. This was at Parx East. I had the nut flush post river and shoved, the Villain had a K high flush and went into the tank. He then exposed his cards to possibly get a read. I asked the dealer why his hand wasn’t dead(obviously I knew otherwise). The dealer suggested that we call the floor to clarify and the floor came over to rule that Villains hand isn’t dead. All the other players around him starting telling him to call(apparently the 1 player per hand didn’t mean anything to anyone at that time), and that I wouldn’t have wanted his hand dead if I had him beat. Well much to the Villains credit, eventually folded while being berated by all those around him. I didn’t say anything about it afterwards because it wasn’t my proudest moment. Although it was a time where so many people were trying out new creative angling techniques.
The difference is you wanted a call and you were trying to make it look like you didn’t. So had the floor ruled it was dead, which you knew they wouldn’t. It would’ve cost you money. In this case, the floor might have ruled against the action already taken by the opponent, which was to put more money in. Had that been the case it would’ve cost a lot of money he actually had quad jacks. In your example, the money had not gone in yet.
@@stevehungerford4305 The question was more so to ascertain the perception given off by someone calling the floor. The fact of the matter is that the villain is well within his rights to raise after Hero changing action(angle or not). Given the uncertainty of intention, most poker rooms would not force the villain to only call behind(despite caller’s whining). So my comment was predicated on the hero having the nuts and complaining that the villain was angling. And hero certainly could do so…with the nuts, also as an angle, without capping his range because no legitimate poker room would rule in his favor. But the perception to most would be that he would only do so with a capped range and that is not correct.
Additionally you would only want to do such with someone who was aware that you could/would do so also as an angle. In the callers scenario, obviously calling the floor on people who believe that you would only call the floor with a capped range isn’t advisable.
Why is this an angle? This happens every hour in every casino at the low stakes because the people missed some action (SB calls e.g.)... Even if i notice there is a player in between and i act out of turn with "check". How this is an advantage for me?
It's an angle if he didn't actually want to check because he essentially got to check/raise from a position that doesn't get that option. I'm not saying that's what happened here, but that's the answer to your question.
with perfect 20/20 hindsight, is the best thing to do as the hero - As soon as opp checks out of turn, hero asks the dealer, "now that he has checked out of turn, what are his options if i check, and if I bet?"
Any poker player should know that if you bet then he can raise because action has been changed. If you need to ask that question you should go play 1/2 to learn the rules first
The floor seems perfectly right about this. The rule is clear, if the action doesn’t change his check is binding. He isn’t gaining any unfair advantage by being bound to it; you just received free information. It also seems a perfectly logical way to play 66. Stop complaining and play better. Fold the turn when you are clearly behind.
I play live poker very infrequently. Last time I did, I inadvertently checked out of turn on the river holding the nuts, because I lost track of position and wanted to check raise. Other player thought it over and then checked (so my action was binding) and I rolled my hand right over. It was a huge pot and probably cost me several hundred dollars. Not an angle, just a mistake. Can’t say whether that was the case here.
21:36 What on earth do you want from the floor when the hand was already correctly adjudicated at the table? He's not going to apply special made-up rules retroactively just because you don't like the standard rule for action out of turn and your opponent was extra-naughty. He probably should use progressive discipline, without changing the outcome of the hand. 1. Warn the guy. 2. Make him sit out an orbit. 3. Bar him for 24 hours. 4. Eighty-six him indefinitely. But that's a lot for the floor to track, especially with the player pool in one of California's largest cities.
It’s weird to me that anyone would think checking out of turn would prevent you from raising if bet into. As if no one could reasonably want to only check, or raise.
Great analysis tho I do agree with the caller that if he calls the floor he caps his range. Why would he call the floor and risk the floor saying villain cannot raise and risk not being able to reraise if hero had AJ. As caller said he wouldnt. Totally agree with Bart that this angle should be covered in the rules ie a check out of turn should mean the only option for the out of turn player is to call or fold to any bet on that street. However, if the villain is a deep thinker it is somewhat possible that he can use all this to launch a creative bluff tho it would be a bit crazy when AJ is a decent part of heros range when he bets and calls a 3B PF.
Not sure I follow the logic. On the river check>bet then he said if he raised, the villain would just fold. Isn't that what you want? What is the downside of the villain folding to your river raise?
He was saying that if he check raised the river that the villain would just fold alp his naked Jacks (trips) but he would still call him with any full house for sure. Which is logic I agree with here it is a good just call. Should have found the fold on the turn though.
I guess the question is if the Hero knows in his heart the LJ angled and says JL would not angle with a semi bluff he just gave you lots of information. Call the floor and fold the hand.
Wow. The whole time they were talking about what villain might have if he's angling like that and I'm just setting here thinking he has a boat or better. He could have AA, JJ, 66, or AJ. I don't think someone is going to angle like this with just trips with a flush and potential straight draw on board.
At most places I have played if there is substantial action you have the ability to change your action, and substantial action in this case would be either a bet that was not placed at the time that you took the out of turn action or a raise. Since the check happened before a bet was made and there is now a bet the action is open for this player to raise. Now that being said I also think Bart is 100% right that this is ripe for exploitation and angling, it is, but the places I have played live would allow this. Now if you play somewhere with a really sharp floor and a guy does this once or twice I believe there should always be a rule allowing floor discretion and you tell the angler to "Come on Joe, you did this last week and I warned you about this, you can't raise now". Obviously the having a history on a player as the floor is more of a smaller market thing.
This isn’t an angle and while frowned upon it is allowed. If you had checked he wouldn’t have been able to bet but since you bet it resets the betting action. Kinda sketch in terms of changing up the actions but you should’ve just checked turn if you were worried about getting raised turn. With that same logic - acting out of turn can also backfire on them too. Because if he had bet out of turn you can leverage the check raise so it essentially evens out since you gain extra info due to his out of turn action.
Find it hilarious that the caller goes off on the casino for not taking responsibility when ... he should have taken responsibility that he played the hand terribly on the turn and river!
Agree with the caller. When someone angles or makes a speech, they're rarely doing it with just trips. This is a boat or better. If the hero didn't have the ace of hearts it could be a nut flush draw as well, I suppose.
The guy could be excited that he hit a boat and checked thinking it was it, wanting someone to catch a draw on the river since there wasn't much interest shown for the pot yet. After someone has manifested interest he can raise the bet a little knowing he should get called.
It is a viable move. Not the cleanest one, but I wouldn't even call it an angle/scummy. It is possible that LJ wanted to check raise the turn/check for deception and make a move on the river, and once you bet it changes his mind, that you have Ax and he can charge additional value on the turn. Probably he tried to induce a bet, which is also fine - it is a commiting action only if it is a legal action - you cannot check after a bet has been made, so you can do whatever. It is not something I would do, but I would induce a call by saying to someone on the clock that his time is up - I really don't see much difference between these 2 actions - you can talk to the floor and he would just say it's fine
I also disagree with you, Bart. When the hero opens the action, the checker can raise. Had the hero checked, I could get on board with forcing the out of turn checker to check behind, but because the hero bet it, the villain can absolutely re-raise
Im new. Whys it obvious that this is an angle rather than an untintentional check out of turn when the original plan was a check raise with an appropriate timed check?
No, it is not obvious. I believe villain thought nobody had an A or a J so he could not get value on the turn and wanted to pick up one or with luck two bets on the river. Then someone bet and he thought that an A, J or a FD was out there and hoped he would get called when he raised. The suggestion that a check out of turn would lead to a bet is questionable in this situation, so the purpose of this alleged angle seems dubious.
Wow, this guy sounded really angry. I play poker almost every week and I've never seen or heard someone "angle" like this. This wasn't even heads up, so there's no guarantee that you would bet knowing that he would check. People get excited when they hit a hand and that's when they act out of turn. Usually people bet out of turn but this guy was probably planning to check raise or trap. Once you bet into 2 people oop you're indicating you have a strong hand and that's when he decided to raise. It's possible this was an angle but not very likely.
Feels like there's at least a chance dude accidentally checked out of turn, planning to check raise. Especially since he was the pf aggressor and it checked round on the flop.
The scumbag literally gave him the perfect option to get out by announcing his hand. Swallow your ego and fold knowing you're way behind. You can demand a floorman to come over midhand and tell him what happened before you fold. Maybe he's got a backbone and look at opponents hand and after realizing it's clearly an angle given his holding, issues some kind of penalty or kicks him out. But this is utopia territory as floor managers never care about players enough to shield them from these anglers.
To punish the angler, fold! The check out of turn, then raise angle line should be something like JJJJ every time Anglers are stupid, they turn their hand face up They do it to enjoy the dupers delight, not necessarily because they think it’s the most profitable play
I think he can't raise. You can't make a passive action out of turn, and then an aggressive action on the same street when it is on you. It doesn't matter if the action changes. I've seen this ruling made before. Maybe its wrong, but i think thats the rule.
This feels like a limp back raise which is always aces or kings just muck And going out of your way to stack an opponent is no good. Ego you go broke in poker.
Once you bet then the betting is open again. He probably wasn't intentionally angling if he assumed you had checked. Him checking out of turn changes your decision then thats on you. Im pretty sure he was gonna raise had he not checked out of turn. Sounds like the caller was more mad about the results than what actually happened. Im writing this before the reveal btw.
I'm just confused. Even if it's an angle, it isn't illegal. He chose to to call for a ruling. What does he want the floor to do? Me? I'm taking the free card and not betting the turn. And if I really felt was was a dirty player, I rack up and change tables
The guy could be excited that he hit a boat and checked thinking it was it, wanting someone to catch a draw on the river since there wasn't much interest shown for the pot yet. After someone has manifested interest he can raise the bet.
Not calling a floor with weak hand is like not asking for an attorney when being questioned by the police... to not look more suspicious than you already are. It's just dumb I think.
I am not even sure this was an angle. After AJJ got checked around twice he might have thought that nobody had an A or a J and so a bet would just lead to him winning a small pot whereas his check behind could earn him one or even two bets on the river. And then someone bet and then the situation changed and villain had a reasonable chance to make some money by raising ...
I don't understand complaining about an angle that happens mid-hand after a hand completes. Once you try to 'freeroll' the opponent, you can't whine after the hand and expect things to go your way.
The Caller called the floor only because he lost the hand. He likely won't say anything if he won. A) What did he want to floor to do after the hand?- Refund? If so, isn't that an Angle? If he wins it's good, if he loses he wants a refund.
The caller isn't consistent. Why was he willing to call the floor and the manager only after the hand was over and he had already lost, but not during the hand? Would he have also called the floor if had won the hand?
This is not an angle. You checking makes it a viable option to raise for strategic reasons even if he was going to check if the action was to him first. Also, the caller is right. Calling floor would definitely cap your range. Nobody would ever ask for a ruling that would put less money in the pot AND take away your option to reraise if you had a strong hand.
its not an an angle...he checked out of the tun and you bet so the action changed he can do what ever he wants ...if he checks out of the turn and u check he cannot bet , his check is binding
Geez I love this show couldn’t disagree more Both keep saying “scum” “angling”. I don’t see it 1. Check raises have been allowed and part of poker for a long time now. 2. Hero reopened the action! Villain is no more angling than hero is angling for going for thin value when villain shows weakness 3. Rope a dope is a very effective strategy when you’re paying attention and playing the players at the table well 4. Obvi hero would cap his range if he called the floor 5. And no Bart hero shouldn’t insist on getting a floor ruling unless hero intended on 3d chess angling if a heart comes. That’s hypocritical 6. Only solid way of double angling would be for hero to call floor ONLY with the nuts. But he can’t cause he doesn’t have the nuts: hence he’s capped Love this show Bart it’s my fav but you guys got this all wrong
So I have pair of knuckles and then the villain four bets so I call to see the toads and then the four of hearts comes out with the 78 of spades and I tank for like 93 minutes. I make the call he has quads
How would you react after the check out of turn followed by a raise after you bet?
He was angling but he’s allowed to do so.
I would fold, for sure.
I'd fold. Hero has next to nothing invested in the hand. Why navigate a turn re-raise and river bet when the hand already looks very fishy and potentially an angle.
@@CrushlivePoker just fold and move on, it’s obvious the guy had a boat. The caller whined because he fell for it and paid off when he should have just folded to the raise and laughed at how the guy saved him money.
This isn't even an angle as you mention at the end. The guy probably just actually checked out of turn thinking nobody has anything or lookin to X/R. But then BB bets and he knows he clearly has something so he raises. I guess this take makes me braindead uh ohhhhh!
Why did this know it all even bother calling in? Literally messed up every street. Changed the action to where the only thing villain couldn’t do was check 😂. It may not even of been an angle, he could have got all giddy lost when he turned the boat and thought he was first to act, looking to check raise. I would think a checking angle would induce more checks, and risking checking it around with the hope that someone catches a flush is costing money. Ps, the floor didn’t want to talk to that guy because he sounds like a pain in the a$$.
honestly even i, as a relative novice was thinking, that the guys has a two pair then a boat the whole time. it does raise the question about how to handle these sorts of players - they do something when they have the hand once, it works and then they do it when they don't have the hand. everyone wants to win, but sometimes making a friend who has your back in the parking lot if shit goes south is worth more than gold.
Couldn't agree more. I feel like this guy should watch the clip in Billy Madison we are all dumber.
Oy vey
I agree with you. The action was changed. The Villian gets to raise. That is the rule in the casino card room I play at. At low stakes, most plays aren't smart enough to angle. They are just stupid or bad or both.
T =13:45. " I don't know why they don't cover that in the rule .. "
What kind of poker ' expert ' are you, Mr. Blogger ? ? ?
Of COURSE it is covered in rules.
' Action out of turn is binding unless action to you changes ' is a standard rule....
Of course he's capping his hand if he calls the floor, get serious Bart.
No cap
I agree with Bart. He could be doing this with a boat too , I tend not not to read into situations like this too much , cause they are to easy manipulate into what you want your opponent to think , which then pretty much makes them meaningless. I can’t remember an exact scenario, but I’m pretty sure I’ve called over a floor before in a situation similar to make my opponent think I was Capped too. When I wasn’t. There are obviously more betting rounds to come , plus sometimes you just want an exact ruling as to the rules , has nothing to do with your hand and whether you are perceived as strong or weak. I agree generally most people wouldn’t call over floor with a boat , but like I said it’s too easy to manipulate your perceived range after that , that putting to much thought into that is probably just a waste of time. Plus you can usually tell if your opponent is the type that would try and mess with your opinion. If he is , than him calling the floor just becomes meaningless , if he’s just a casual player than yes it could lean my decision, but if it’s a player that has experience I wouldn’t put much thought into it
In a side note , I like how caller says he wants to punish the player by beating him in the hand. lol. That’s the opposite way of punishing him. You punish this type of player by basically snap folding your hand and thank him for giving g away the strength of his hand.
I agree with niki.
No chance he calls floor if he has a book. Let's be honest 99% of players aren't trying to be ethical or do what's 100% right according to rhe rules...they're trying to win $.
Why would you call the floor if someone wants to donate you more $ ? To be more ethical?
@@Fred-rg5vwcaller really shouldn’t have any boats here anyways , but it’s live poker so who the heck knows. I guess he could have 6s full , but obviously as we find out later he can’t have that.
@@Womenandwine
Yes as someone else posted it most likely wasn't an angle at all. He just got excited to slow play when he hit is 2 outta.
If it was an angle it doesn't really make any sense anyway..not gaining much if anything. Had position and a small bet was always gonna be called...mighta even induced a raise.
I do agree with the caller that at these stakes, calling the floor caps your range. There are very few players with the wherewithal to call floor with a monster hand in this scenario, at low stakes.
That's all I agree with, though. Calling the floor over an angle is wild and gives the guy exactly the reaction his scummy little ego wants. I agree with Bart, show him the nut flush and tell him you'd have raised him for sure if not for his action on the turn and he cost himself a few hundred. Make sure he knows that he's so bad that he knows he needed a 1 out turn (because the other 6 costs the hero nothing, he just folds) into a 9 out river to even get the pitiful pot he did get in a disgusting cooler hand.
Yes. Bart, who is usually always right, is 100% wrong on this.
If you call the floor, there is no way you have quads or a full boat. Unless you yourself are an absolute idiot. Just re-raise the guy and get more money in there. You know he’s got a strong hand and you’ve got him toasted.
@@Vipr77 Would that make it acceptable for someone not involved in the hand to call the floor after the obvious angle shoot once he raises after checking out of turn? Or do we still follow the rule that if you're not involved in the hand, you stay silent even if you observe another playing doing a really scummy angle shoot?
@@gabrielrockman Up to judgment of course.....but I am the guy who calls the floor in this scenario out of the hand. I hate this garbage. I'd be conflicted but likely call floor for the sake of integrity. I've taken heat in the past for this but I do it anyway. I just hate anglers.
@@gabrielrockmanit's beholden on the players to police the game. That concept is generally misplaced at a poker table.
This caller is out of his mind. What does he think the floor was going to do? What does he think the cameras would show? Aside from warning the angler to cut the crap, there’s nothing else they can do, because here’s the thing about angles - they’re not against the rules. They’re sleazy ways to take advantage of the rules, but they aren’t cheating. This guy was pissy because he knew he got angled, he let it happen, and his response to that is to complain about it to the floor? I am not suppprting the angle shooter at all, but at you have to take responsibility for yourself at the poker table. Complaining that the floor didn’t bail him out after he lost that hand is as weak as it gets.
exactly! The caller is a cry baby when someone took away his toy after he threw it out, anyway. Once he called x/r, he accepted opponent's acting.
At the end caller says to “check the cameras”. Even if the cameras caught the action, they can't discern intent. The cameras don’t know whether it was an innocent mistake by the guy, or whether he purposely acted out of turn.
Could it have been an angle? Sure. But the caller still sounds like he thinks the world is out to get him.
I love how he said "yea could have folded turn but wanted to beat him!"
I never realized until this call how much it tilts me when people say "re-raise" to describe the first raise after a bet.
Happens where I play all the time lol
Or any raise... You don't need to say re-... same with somebody telling a story and saying 'cold call' etc... another annoying thing is when a player gets raised heads up on the river and acts annoyed like the raiser did something personally wrong, or played their hand like a moron (just because a player caught them)
- another one, this happened a ton in the early-mid 2000's... A player would be raised on the turn or river and would call time and look up and mouth words like "look at me, I'm strategizing and openly showing everybody that I'm thinking" then shaking their head in disguist and sarcastically saying "nice hand" "if you want if that bad, go ahead..."
lol. you guys Tilt easy if this crap Tilts you. This guy is Tilted because the Villian snagged his 6 on the Turn and got his bad play rewarded.
Some people consider checking as "betting $0"
So a check, and then a bet
Is really a bet, and then a raise
Don't worry, I am not one of the people. Lol
It’s getting to me too
What a great move to call the floor on this guy if you have the nuts here. Angle the angler
This is my thought. If I had the nuts with the pocket Js, I'd absolutely call the floor and then if they agreed with him, act like I just went on tilt and start throwing money in. Angle the dude right back. Regardless, if you thought you might be getting angled, huge mistake to bet on the turn. Just check. It makes him check too. See the free card. You can still bet river if you want to.
I feel for the caller, and I agree with the caller (disagree with Bart) that calling the floor in the middle of the hand gives away info on your hand. However, playing the hand out and then whining about it with the floor and the manager when you lose isn't a good look either. Plus, it could have just been a legitimate mistake. The other player could have checked with the intention to check raise, but then realized it wasn't his turn.
I agree with you 100%. The check was probably mistake, and he planned to check raise. and everything else you said.
where i play, if you check out of turn you are not allowed to raise to any ensuing bet. (ie: you're not allowed to take any kind of aggressive action (bet or raise) if you performed a defensive action out of turn). any cardroom that doesn't have this rule just invites the kind of abuse described in this video
This is the comment I was looking for.
This seems like the kind of thing that derives from people who think check raising itself is immoral.
It’s not as if someone couldn’t honestly want to check, or raise.
@@mikemck4796obviously nothing wrong with check-raising. but checking out of turn to induce a bet in order to then raise is an angle-shoot. and where i play, it is simply not allowed. if you check out of turn, you cannot bet or raise when it comes back to you, you can only check or call.
@@colindickson6099
But this isn’t the norm in most casinos.
100% - the incentives here are terrible
I was surprised 66 wasn’t mentioned as I thought that was the most likely hand that V would play this way.
Why can't V just have AJ or AA or JJ?
@@EllieBanks333 more likely they just call turn and raise the river with those hands.
@@nuklearwinter2892 Makes sense.
All i got from this video is the fish play at m8trix in SJ CA
🤣
I get that the caller is frustrated, but the evidence this is an angle is weak. It's a $90 pot and holding 66 is an easy check on pretty much any turn, he might of just been on autopilot and didn't register the 6 in time. People check out of turn a lot, it stinks when it impacts action but that's kind of unavoidable. In fact, I cannot buy that this guy processed within one second that, "you know what I'm going to do? I hit my 6, I'm going to check out of turn, make it look weak, hope he bets, and then get him with a check raise." That's quite farfetched even for a scummy dude. He also handicaps himself because he takes away his own ability to bet if you check up front. But even *if* he was angling, what is the floor supposed to do after the hand? You still bet the turn, you called the raise, and you called the river. Sure, cameras can see everything but this doesn't meet any reasonable standard of clear intent and illegal action, and the alleged angle was multiple decision points in the past.
I wish Bart's whole framing of this video were different, from "that guy is scum" to "look caller, here's a bit of advice."
Bart is crazy to think that the nuts is going to call the floor over and risk having a raise taken away. Caller is crazy to think about check-raising a flush on the river. Villain has spent this hand thinking about how to angle the caller, lots of boats in his range.
Caller a fish that thinks he good lol
This was NOT an angle and the Villain in all likelihood had 66 when he does this, and what advantage is the villain even getting by doing this? I see this particular mistake a lot and everyone flips out and always assumes it's an angle but what advantage is the "angler" getting by checking out of turn when he has a made hand? Yes maybe it somewhat encourages the hero to bet but if the hero checks the "angler" is now forced to check behind. This scenario stinks for the villain. And as for it encouraging the hero to bet, considering every single time someone checks out of turn the entire table always starts saying "omg angle" I'm not even sure if it does encourage the hero to bet more often,.... it might even encourage a check more often.
Psychology 101. Villain spikes his 2 outer, gets excited and "aggressively slow-plays" . You just get excited and want to do something, most bad players first instinct is to slowplay, so you just start checking even though it's not your turn. It's the same process that makes a baseball pitcher throw the ball to first base on a hard comebacker at 100mph even though he has all day to make the throw, the adrenaline rush of the ball coming hard at you that you just caught. This check out of turn is almost never an angle, and the villain is heavily weighted towards 66 as soon as it happens.
Exactly right. I think its more likely a bad player that wants to check raise a pro or for-profit whiner, and gets alittle ahead of himself by checking out of turn, than an angler.
Also, the only way this "angle" works is if you do it against someone that will call the raise because they are too emotional in their decision making. By the caller's explanation of why he called the turn, looks like the villian found the perfect sucker.
this isn't an angle at all
First - this is room dependent, so no harm in asking. I have seen rooms where the player is only allowed to call/fold - he can't raise when he checks out of turn. (right or wrong, there needs to be SOMETHING to make people conscious of betting in turn) I don't think it caps the range at all...even if you don't have the presence of mind to angle the angler here, I'd call the floor to make sure it's allowed, first to remove any doubt of the validity of the action in that hand (If I do have the nuts I don't want the floor doing something stupid after the fact, get the ruling in real time), and second to know for next time. It also puts everyone on alert about this clown. I would call the floor with JJ in this hand.
Hero changed action by betting, villain gets all options again. This happens pretty often and is a pretty standard ruling. calling the floor wouldn’t have helped you and yes it would have told (at least me) that you didn’t have a J
FYI, at Bay 101 across the street, the rule is that if you check out a turn you absolutely cannot raise even if the action changes and your options are only call or fold. Checking is the only option out of turn where when action changes it doesn't give you all of the options back specifically at Bay 101 and they probably use the same rule at matrix. I dealt poker at Bay 101 for almost 4 years and this rule was implemented because people were checking out a turn on the button pretending that they thought they were first to act, then raising after somebody bets.
@@charlesnewborn3760This should be the the standard rule no need to reward an angler. If the check out of turn is an honest mistake then you should be forced to honor said check or call a bet. You should absolutely lose the option to raise.
@@charlesnewborn3760yet another reason to NEVER play poker in California. It really speaks volumes when you need rules implemented like that to the character of the average Californian 😂
@@jacobbirkenfeld9261 Oh PLEASE, this has nothing to do with California people; it has to do with the nature of poker players in general. Poker players arent the most honest of individuals on average I mean the game itself promotes lying. I play poker all over the US and out of all the places I played, California has some of the more nicer poker players. Florida was the worst.
actually no you are wrong. non aggressive action out of turn only has non aggressive action when option comes to them. You can not check out of turn and then raise. only option is fold or call.
Oh my word, I love it when people check out of turn. Gives me so much more information. In this case, it clearly showed the angle and it became a trivial fold on the turn. The caller let revenge mode get the best of . And it cost additional money. Just fold, thanks for the free information and moved to the next hand.
I'd interrogate the guy a bit. "So let me get this straight: you wanted to check, but after I bet you wanted to raise?" Just see what he says.
Obviously not a bluff. I’ve seen that move too many times, they always have the nuts. They x because they think no one has anything. As soon as they see you betting the raise comes in. Might not be even planned. Just the way they think
I thought this guy was talking about me for a second. I hit a boat on the turn and I was so exited to slow play it. Hoping for a flush to come on the river, so I can stack anybody with a flush draw and jacks.
When I did this, I was not trying to angle anyone. I just did it because I was too excited to slow play a full house.
That might have been the case. Anytime a player is too interested in a board or act out of turn, it is usually a tell that they have the best hand.
Good to know games are still good lol
To answer you last question I do believe there is a chance he wasn’t angling
I think this guy has called before. Bart labeled it as the worst play of all time. Believe ii
was a 2,3,5,10 game at bay 101.
Could be mistaken, but he sounds similar with same kind of attitude
That's casino M8. Lots of action and wild plays
This call was frustrating to listen to, because Bart missed the mark on a caller that could use a lot of constructive criticism, and Bart is usually spot on with situations like this that arise all the time at low stakes.
Here is what I would have said if I was Bart:
1) Don't play with emotion. You don't call the guy on the turn because you "want to beat him". That is a losing player mentality.
2) A player will always have all options after checking out of turn IF the in-turn player then bets. The action has changed. This is standard. I'm not suggesting the caller should have checked the turn necessarily, because people check out of turn all the time at low stakes, and that alone is not an indicator that you're being angled.
3) Yeah, what he did was an angle, but it's not an effective one. He's giving away a ton of info by pulling this. Low stakes players do not often angle a check so they can raise a combo draw on a paired board.
4) The second reason to fold the turn is because you have a flush draw on a paired board vs an opponent that is screaming strength and offering you bad pot odds. Implied odds don't help here because you don't even have the nut draw. This should be made obvious by the fact that the caller check-called the river after hitting his flush. If you knew you weren't going to be able to raise the river (again, paired board, opponent screaming strength) why call getting bad odds on the turn? This points back to my #1. Emotion. The caller got mad at the angler, and did exactly what the angler was hoping. Congrats, you got played.
5) Bart mentioned this at the end, but it's entirely plausible that the "angler" didn't even intend to angle at all. He turns a boat, and plans to check if no one bets, hoping they river a flush and go crazy. He's excited and acting too quickly. But oh, look, someone leads out! "Ok, time to raise!" This is a far simpler explanation for what happened.
6) Don't get me wrong, I'm not simping for M8trix here, or their floormen particularly. If you want to get mad at the floor, do it because they put people at the top of the wait list when you tip them well upon sign up (at least, that's what they did 5 years ago when I last played there). There is nothing the floor could, would, or even should have done here. The only recourse you have when someone checks out of turn is to force them to check when checked to, and it's your responsibility as a player to make sure that happens. If it doesn't, THAT is when the floor can do something.
7) Don't expect everyone to play by the code of conduct you hold yourself to, and don't get upset and thrown off your game when they don't. It will happen. It's your job as a winning player to not let that affect your ability to make profitable decisions.
Exactly. I play full time. People angle and people make mistakes. I’d never call the floor over that. Keep them happy is the #1 priority. After making $ 😂
I think there is a small possibility that it wasn't an angle. He could have the intent to slow play and legitimately check out of turn, but then decide to raise after you bet because at that point he has reason to believe you have a hand. It's possible that the action of betting legitimately changed his decision.
That said, it probably was an angle. I just don't believe it's 100% conclusive.
Don’t personally believe this was an angle, this caller is funny to me, to put it nicely.
If the rule at the casino is that if the action changes, the player that acted out of turn has all options, then the floor did nothing wrong. It’s not guaranteed it was an angle. Guy could have just been going for a checkraise. If you’re aware of the possibility it’s an angle, then you actually have an advantage by him acting out of turn, sine his options are now limited and yours are not. In summary: bad call (in both senses)
I don’t even think this was 100% an angle lol. It probably was, but there’s a good chance it wasn’t either.
So if someone checks out of turn and someone else bets.,, the original checker only supposed to call a bet? I assume once a bet is made the person who checked out of turn can raise if they want.
Why couldn't the villain be check raising, but accidently checking out of turn? 🤔
This is a good point.
At crown Casino in Australia if you 3 bet the preflop and take it down, they would still take $9 from you, as there was already $60 in the pot + your call of 30. They don't tax your raise. Pretty crazy
I'm with caller. If I have a boat I'm just happy more money in.
If they are loose, you should 3bet always! The problem with 3bets is vs tight open range, that dominates your 3bet range/a lot of 4bet bluffs. A9s is a mix, but vs the stated pool it is definitely a winning 3bet.
13:10 i agree w/ caller that trying to deny/challenge the turn raise would make your own hand be perceived as weak, especially when you only bet 1/3 pot already.
A. This likely wasn't even an angle: Villian's "angling" line makes sense if he thinks that Hero checked and is going for a X/R or just thinks nobody has anything.. and then when Hero bets he changes course.
B. Callers argument is "I knew this guy was angling me but I gave him my money anyways, wahhhh" boo hoo to caller
NJ/PA/MD any poker room any floor will tell you that the raise is allowed. They would give him a warning to not check out of turn but his option to raise is there after you bet because you changed the action. Caller made a mistake by not 3b flop and by leading turn. If I’m not 3b pre then I’m definitely just x this turn multiway. What are you trying to get called by? Gutters? Worse Ax that you will chop with on a lot of rivers?
Bart is correct. Calling the floor does not give away the strength of the hero's hand.
I wanted to hear what the manager said, since the caller stated that the manager saw everything, as if it had bearing on the outcome. (Caller said that the floor was the one trying to rationalize, not the manager.)
Just to answer the caller’s question yes you could do that as an angle yourself if you had a nutted hand.
I’ve pulled something similar about 10 years ago, when I wasn’t as strict about angling etiquette.
This was at Parx East.
I had the nut flush post river and shoved, the Villain had a K high flush and went into the tank. He then exposed his cards to possibly get a read. I asked the dealer why his hand wasn’t dead(obviously I knew otherwise). The dealer suggested that we call the floor to clarify and the floor came over to rule that Villains hand isn’t dead. All the other players around him starting telling him to call(apparently the 1 player per hand didn’t mean anything to anyone at that time), and that I wouldn’t have wanted his hand dead if I had him beat. Well much to the Villains credit, eventually folded while being berated by all those around him. I didn’t say anything about it afterwards because it wasn’t my proudest moment. Although it was a time where so many people were trying out new creative angling techniques.
The difference is you wanted a call and you were trying to make it look like you didn’t. So had the floor ruled it was dead, which you knew they wouldn’t. It would’ve cost you money.
In this case, the floor might have ruled against the action already taken by the opponent, which was to put more money in. Had that been the case it would’ve cost a lot of money he actually had quad jacks.
In your example, the money had not gone in yet.
@@stevehungerford4305
The question was more so to ascertain the perception given off by someone calling the floor. The fact of the matter is that the villain is well within his rights to raise after Hero changing action(angle or not). Given the uncertainty of intention, most poker rooms would not force the villain to only call behind(despite caller’s whining). So my comment was predicated on the hero having the nuts and complaining that the villain was angling. And hero certainly could do so…with the nuts, also as an angle, without capping his range because no legitimate poker room would rule in his favor. But the perception to most would be that he would only do so with a capped range and that is not correct.
Additionally you would only want to do such with someone who was aware that you could/would do so also as an angle. In the callers scenario, obviously calling the floor on people who believe that you would only call the floor with a capped range isn’t advisable.
Here are the pre-flop Aces ranked weakest to strongest: A2, A6, A3, A4, A7, A5, A8, A9, AT. Or (26347589T).
Of course JQKA follows that.
Why is this an angle? This happens every hour in every casino at the low stakes because the people missed some action (SB calls e.g.)... Even if i notice there is a player in between and i act out of turn with "check". How this is an advantage for me?
It's an angle if he didn't actually want to check because he essentially got to check/raise from a position that doesn't get that option. I'm not saying that's what happened here, but that's the answer to your question.
with perfect 20/20 hindsight, is the best thing to do as the hero - As soon as opp checks out of turn, hero asks the dealer, "now that he has checked out of turn, what are his options if i check, and if I bet?"
Any poker player should know that if you bet then he can raise because action has been changed. If you need to ask that question you should go play 1/2 to learn the rules first
The floor seems perfectly right about this.
The rule is clear, if the action doesn’t change his check is binding.
He isn’t gaining any unfair advantage by being bound to it; you just received free information.
It also seems a perfectly logical way to play 66.
Stop complaining and play better. Fold the turn when you are clearly behind.
I play live poker very infrequently. Last time I did, I inadvertently checked out of turn on the river holding the nuts, because I lost track of position and wanted to check raise. Other player thought it over and then checked (so my action was binding) and I rolled my hand right over. It was a huge pot and probably cost me several hundred dollars. Not an angle, just a mistake. Can’t say whether that was the case here.
21:36 What on earth do you want from the floor when the hand was already correctly adjudicated at the table? He's not going to apply special made-up rules retroactively just because you don't like the standard rule for action out of turn and your opponent was extra-naughty.
He probably should use progressive discipline, without changing the outcome of the hand. 1. Warn the guy. 2. Make him sit out an orbit. 3. Bar him for 24 hours. 4. Eighty-six him indefinitely. But that's a lot for the floor to track, especially with the player pool in one of California's largest cities.
It’s weird to me that anyone would think checking out of turn would prevent you from raising if bet into.
As if no one could reasonably want to only check, or raise.
Great analysis tho I do agree with the caller that if he calls the floor he caps his range. Why would he call the floor and risk the floor saying villain cannot raise and risk not being able to reraise if hero had AJ. As caller said he wouldnt. Totally agree with Bart that this angle should be covered in the rules ie a check out of turn should mean the only option for the out of turn player is to call or fold to any bet on that street. However, if the villain is a deep thinker it is somewhat possible that he can use all this to launch a creative bluff tho it would be a bit crazy when AJ is a decent part of heros range when he bets and calls a 3B PF.
Not sure I follow the logic. On the river check>bet then he said if he raised, the villain would just fold. Isn't that what you want? What is the downside of the villain folding to your river raise?
He was saying that if he check raised the river that the villain would just fold alp his naked Jacks (trips) but he would still call him with any full house for sure. Which is logic I agree with here it is a good just call.
Should have found the fold on the turn though.
I guess the question is if the Hero knows in his heart the LJ angled and says JL would not angle with a semi bluff he just gave you lots of information. Call the floor and fold the hand.
Wow. The whole time they were talking about what villain might have if he's angling like that and I'm just setting here thinking he has a boat or better. He could have AA, JJ, 66, or AJ. I don't think someone is going to angle like this with just trips with a flush and potential straight draw on board.
"I knew he was angling me but I paid him $300 to get revenge" 😂
At most places I have played if there is substantial action you have the ability to change your action, and substantial action in this case would be either a bet that was not placed at the time that you took the out of turn action or a raise. Since the check happened before a bet was made and there is now a bet the action is open for this player to raise.
Now that being said I also think Bart is 100% right that this is ripe for exploitation and angling, it is, but the places I have played live would allow this. Now if you play somewhere with a really sharp floor and a guy does this once or twice I believe there should always be a rule allowing floor discretion and you tell the angler to "Come on Joe, you did this last week and I warned you about this, you can't raise now". Obviously the having a history on a player as the floor is more of a smaller market thing.
This isn’t an angle and while frowned upon it is allowed. If you had checked he wouldn’t have been able to bet but since you bet it resets the betting action.
Kinda sketch in terms of changing up the actions but you should’ve just checked turn if you were worried about getting raised turn.
With that same logic - acting out of turn can also backfire on them too. Because if he had bet out of turn you can leverage the check raise so it essentially evens out since you gain extra info due to his out of turn action.
Find it hilarious that the caller goes off on the casino for not taking responsibility when ... he should have taken responsibility that he played the hand terribly on the turn and river!
What is the criteria to choose what size to open pre flop ?
Raise as much as you possibly can with big hands to get two or three callers, raise small with implied odds hands, profit.
Did I miss the discussion of check-shoving river as a bluff?
If hero had JJ and called the floor is that classed as an "angle"?
Agree with the caller. When someone angles or makes a speech, they're rarely doing it with just trips. This is a boat or better. If the hero didn't have the ace of hearts it could be a nut flush draw as well, I suppose.
Bart's wrong, it definitely caps his hand if he called the floor.
Why did this caller call if he just argued with everything Bart suggested ??
The guy could be excited that he hit a boat and checked thinking it was it, wanting someone to catch a draw on the river since there wasn't much interest shown for the pot yet.
After someone has manifested interest he can raise the bet a little knowing he should get called.
Why'd they call in?
So that they could dismiss Bart's opinion on every aspect of the hand.
To try and vent and badmouth the casino and the floor guy, clearly.
Lol that caller was mad. What if dudes checked by accident?
He may have been going to check raise?
JEEZ!!! Tough video to get through. This guys is overthinking every play.......
It is a viable move. Not the cleanest one, but I wouldn't even call it an angle/scummy. It is possible that LJ wanted to check raise the turn/check for deception and make a move on the river, and once you bet it changes his mind, that you have Ax and he can charge additional value on the turn.
Probably he tried to induce a bet, which is also fine - it is a commiting action only if it is a legal action - you cannot check after a bet has been made, so you can do whatever. It is not something I would do, but I would induce a call by saying to someone on the clock that his time is up - I really don't see much difference between these 2 actions - you can talk to the floor and he would just say it's fine
20 mins of venting. Nice work.
I also disagree with you, Bart. When the hero opens the action, the checker can raise. Had the hero checked, I could get on board with forcing the out of turn checker to check behind, but because the hero bet it, the villain can absolutely re-raise
Im new. Whys it obvious that this is an angle rather than an untintentional check out of turn when the original plan was a check raise with an appropriate timed check?
No, it is not obvious. I believe villain thought nobody had an A or a J so he could not get value on the turn and wanted to pick up one or with luck two bets on the river. Then someone bet and he thought that an A, J or a FD was out there and hoped he would get called when he raised.
The suggestion that a check out of turn would lead to a bet is questionable in this situation, so the purpose of this alleged angle seems dubious.
I’ve been the victim of the out of turn river shove before. It hurts the soul.
just FOLD when the guys TELLS you waht he has(a hand that crushes you).
Wow, this guy sounded really angry.
I play poker almost every week and I've never seen or heard someone "angle" like this. This wasn't even heads up, so there's no guarantee that you would bet knowing that he would check.
People get excited when they hit a hand and that's when they act out of turn. Usually people bet out of turn but this guy was probably planning to check raise or trap. Once you bet into 2 people oop you're indicating you have a strong hand and that's when he decided to raise.
It's possible this was an angle but not very likely.
Feels like there's at least a chance dude accidentally checked out of turn, planning to check raise. Especially since he was the pf aggressor and it checked round on the flop.
The scumbag literally gave him the perfect option to get out by announcing his hand. Swallow your ego and fold knowing you're way behind. You can demand a floorman to come over midhand and tell him what happened before you fold. Maybe he's got a backbone and look at opponents hand and after realizing it's clearly an angle given his holding, issues some kind of penalty or kicks him out. But this is utopia territory as floor managers never care about players enough to shield them from these anglers.
I was rooting for the check-out-of-turn guy by the end of this. Jesus
To punish the angler, fold!
The check out of turn, then raise angle line should be something like JJJJ every time
Anglers are stupid, they turn their hand face up
They do it to enjoy the dupers delight, not necessarily because they think it’s the most profitable play
Can you please explain why the 2 is on the button? Is that bc it’s in California rake thing like you talked about?
Many consider/play it like a button ante,.. it mildly effects play... "Opinions vary". I'm personally indifferent...
Some players check their strong hands until someone puts money in. I'm not sure the check out of turn was intentional, though it could have been.
I think he can't raise. You can't make a passive action out of turn, and then an aggressive action on the same street when it is on you. It doesn't matter if the action changes. I've seen this ruling made before. Maybe its wrong, but i think thats the rule.
This feels like a limp back raise which is always aces or kings just muck
And going out of your way to stack an opponent is no good.
Ego you go broke in poker.
Once you bet then the betting is open again. He probably wasn't intentionally angling if he assumed you had checked. Him checking out of turn changes your decision then thats on you. Im pretty sure he was gonna raise had he not checked out of turn.
Sounds like the caller was more mad about the results than what actually happened.
Im writing this before the reveal btw.
it might be angly but in Vegas the player wont get reprimanded, at least in my experience.
I'm just confused. Even if it's an angle, it isn't illegal. He chose to to call for a ruling. What does he want the floor to do? Me? I'm taking the free card and not betting the turn. And if I really felt was was a dirty player, I rack up and change tables
The guy could be excited that he hit a boat and checked thinking it was it, wanting someone to catch a draw on the river since there wasn't much interest shown for the pot yet.
After someone has manifested interest he can raise the bet.
Not calling a floor with weak hand is like not asking for an attorney when being questioned by the police... to not look more suspicious than you already are. It's just dumb I think.
With a boat you can legally angle him by calling the floor. But of course it looks like you capped your hand if you do that
I am not even sure this was an angle. After AJJ got checked around twice he might have thought that nobody had an A or a J and so a bet would just lead to him winning a small pot whereas his check behind could earn him one or even two bets on the river. And then someone bet and then the situation changed and villain had a reasonable chance to make some money by raising ...
I don't understand complaining about an angle that happens mid-hand after a hand completes. Once you try to 'freeroll' the opponent, you can't whine after the hand and expect things to go your way.
The Caller called the floor only because he lost the hand. He likely won't say anything if he won. A) What did he want to floor to do after the hand?- Refund? If so, isn't that an Angle? If he wins it's good, if he loses he wants a refund.
This reminds me of the first check raise ever video but GGAI lol
The caller isn't consistent. Why was he willing to call the floor and the manager only after the hand was over and he had already lost, but not during the hand? Would he have also called the floor if had won the hand?
This is not an angle. You checking makes it a viable option to raise for strategic reasons even if he was going to check if the action was to him first.
Also, the caller is right. Calling floor would definitely cap your range. Nobody would ever ask for a ruling that would put less money in the pot AND take away your option to reraise if you had a strong hand.
its not an an angle...he checked out of the tun and you bet so the action changed he can do what ever he wants ...if he checks out of the turn and u check he cannot bet , his check is binding
Geez I love this show couldn’t disagree more
Both keep saying “scum” “angling”. I don’t see it
1. Check raises have been allowed and part of poker for a long time now.
2. Hero reopened the action! Villain is no more angling than hero is angling for going for thin value when villain shows weakness
3. Rope a dope is a very effective strategy when you’re paying attention and playing the players at the table well
4. Obvi hero would cap his range if he called the floor
5. And no Bart hero shouldn’t insist on getting a floor ruling unless hero intended on 3d chess angling if a heart comes. That’s hypocritical
6. Only solid way of double angling would be for hero to call floor ONLY with the nuts. But he can’t cause he doesn’t have the nuts: hence he’s capped
Love this show Bart it’s my fav but you guys got this all wrong
Maybe you can still make money in live poker after all
So I have pair of knuckles and then the villain four bets so I call to see the toads and then the four of hearts comes out with the 78 of spades and I tank for like 93 minutes. I make the call he has quads
I don't see anything dirty here. It would've been the same as calling x/r dirty. If any, dirty would've been calling the floor to prevent x/r.
you gotta overbet the river. looks like a tilted move and he can't fold after that dirty angle move.