Hey guys! Thanks for watching, if you enjoy the content please be sure to like the video and subscribe to the channel. I'll be releasing another video in just a few hours! As always, leave your video suggestions down below.
Harry discarding the stone that way shows how much he's grown as a character. In Philosopher's Stone, Harry was enchanted by the Mirror of Erised, going back to look at the images of his family it showed him. He probably would have kept seeking the mirror out had Dumbledore not moved it. Then, with the stone in his possession, he had the power to summon the ghost -like figures of his family once more. He could have succumbed to the temptation to keep the stone and use it regularly, but he chose not to. As you say, the stone had used its purpose for that one moment of comfort and assurance that those he loved were with him and it gave him the courage to continue. He didn't need it anymore. He'd also resigned himself to his death, keeping the stone meant the temptation of being able to use it again might have been enough for him to fight for his life, which is something he couldn't do at that moment.
I'd honestly try to use the resurrection stone to talk to people like the three brothers, Sun Tzu and other historical figures that might lend me their lost wisdom and knowledge.
Dumbledore also gave him the advice to not to forget about living. if he kept the stone he would always be looking back at what was gone rather than looking forward to life
(If u don’t know) In the book, Harry didn’t break the elder wand but with that wand he repaired his original wand and than he puted the elder wand in Dumbledore’s grave. Also, Harry was related by blood with the youngest brother
@@vladp089 that would have actually made some story continuity. Same way Peeves wasn't in the films even all the house ghosts made their presence known or having nearly headless Nick's death party actually in the films.
I always thought it was simple. He thought he was going to die and had no reason to hold onto an object to speak with the dead since he was going to join them shortly.
Me personally, I believe he dropped the stone on purpose. He didn’t want anyone becoming the master of death or heading down that path similar to Voldemort and the original owners.
I always saw the stone as leaving behind the last thing that could prevent Harry from accepting his death as necessary. It acted as a Patronus to carry Harry through the dementors, therefore, it's possible, though unlikely, the stone could have dulled, delayed, or prevented Voldemort casting the killing curse. Harry would not have taken the chance...plus..the stone, for Harry, is very much akin to the Mirror of Erised. The lesson has already been learned to not allow the past, even with the best of intentions, to keep him from living in the present. The Stone is a trap, just as The Mirror, and Harry knows to avoid this particular trap very well; being the 3rd version of it he's experienced (the first was when Voldemort promised to bring Harry's parents back).
I remember the first time I've seen the movie thinking that the invisibility clock from his father was actually a deadly hallow, and that Dumbledore actually made it his purpose to introduce them slowly to Harry (Hence the snitch that only showed when needed and never mentioning the wand), in order to ensure that he won't get corrupted by the power they posses. I think is somehow poetic to think that at one point Harry had all 3 deadly hallows, and if he so wished at the time, he could have kept them to become the most dangerous wizard of all time, if it wasn't for Dumbledore. The fact that he decided to keep only the one that helped him stay humble, and didn't draw any attention to himself, is very consistent with his character, and with the lessons he has learned along the way.
I wounded about that myself, and I think you have found the best answer. Harry was essentially a kind, and good person who as Sirius Black said " you're a good person to whom bad things have happened. " This is an important point to remember when you explain why Harry dropped the stone. Thank you for sharing this.
No, because Voldemort died fading away to dust and his soul too because he split his soul so many times and made so many Horcruxes making him less human.
@Mauricio Ortega No i was mocking you because of the exclamation marks. I would picture you being one of those dorks who over-exaggerates and overreacts over things
Always Quality content bro.💕 You included every bit that was needed. 10/10 I think Harry had understood one thing that many great wizards, including Dumbledore did not understand at once - that the dead people are dead. They do not want to come back. They are at peace. Dragging them back would be a horrible thing to do to them . That will be messing the nature's system. When he used the stone, he didn't had the intentions to bring them back to the mortal world. On the contrary he thought that he was going to join them in death. No harm in that. He also didn't want other people to take the stone. The greed for the Hallows had caused so much war , violence and bloodshed. With his end he wanted to finish that thing which caused so much trouble. He wanted everything to end with him.
Maybe not in five years, but yeah, there's no reason why the stone wouldn't eventually be found. And that's OK. It's probably the least potentially harmful of all the three hallows. It can't really be used as a weapon, and it can't *really* bring someone back from the dead. The most harm it would do is to the person who tries to use it. Question: Can the stone "bring back" anyone at all from the dead? Godric Gryffindor? Cadmus Peverell? Merlin? I don't think it can. At least we don't see any evidence of this. We only ever see it bringing back people that the user knows (and presumably loves) personally. That's pretty much the whole point - to bring back lost loved ones, not just any person who's dead.
I don't see why it wouldn't be if Harry was willing to tell them, unless being pressed into the ground by a Centaur means it's buried now (I'm not sure if Accio would still work if it was).
It's likely you cannot accio the stone. Alot of powerful magical objects are un-accio-able. Outside of lore this is probably to stop the spell being too powerful for the plot. Otherwise harry could just accio the horcruxes
Have you ever considered that since the Elder Wand was loyal to Harry while Harry had the other two Deathly Hallows Harry in essence possessed all three Deathly Hallows?
Swagulishush Doge the reason he didn’t have a three is because he didn’t get the ring till book 6 half blood prince because of the curse that happened on his arm we know he didn’t get it before he gave the cloak to Harry
In the books, the Hallows were each indestructible. In the movies, they were destroyed handily, passively even...zero effort required. At least two were. The stone survived in both media. In the book it was because Harry needed the moral comfort of seeing his deceased loved ones one last time before sacrificing his own life to save everyone at Hogwarts. Past that, the Deathstone had no value for him. (In the movie, I'm sure if there had been a means easily at hand by which he could have crushed it to powder, he'd have done so for the sake of consistency.)
I always had the idea that he dropped the stone because he was done with it and since he was expecting to die, he didn't want Voldemort to get it. As for it being found later, so what? Would anyone finding this lying on the ground have any way to know what it was?
Harry wanted it over with but there was a very real possibility that Voldemort would have hours of Cruciatus fun with him before finishing him, which in my mind makes him even more brave knowing he might have endured so much more before his death. One of the truest Gryffindors of all time.
It's OK. JK Rowling made the same booboo in reverse in the first edition of Chamber of Secrets. Following Harry killing the basilisk, Dumbledore tells him Voldemort is the last living ANCESTOR of Slytherin. I believe it was fixed in later printings.
I noticed that too, perhaps he meant Morfin was Cadmus' descendant since he shows a picture of Morfin as he is talking about this? Lol it's a small muck up I reckon
It seems inevitable that the stone will eventually be found, but I don't think it's that big of a deal. Harry still has the cloak, and will pass it down to his children. Once Harry dies, the wand will never have a true master again, so will essentially be nothing more than an ordinary wand. And the stone can't really do much harm, except psychologically to the person who tries to use it.
Harry dropped the Stone in a clearing at the darkest, deepest heart of the forest, where creatures like Aracnomantula tend to hive. He knew nobody would ever be able to find the stone again (the diadem was hidden similarly and took 1000 years to find). As for the Elder Wand, harry uses it to repair his own wand, and places it back in Dumbledores tomb. He knew that the day he died, without a successor, the wand would lose all power and become a useless piece of wood (thus ending the Death Sticks bloody trail).
That is true 😂 but doesn’t mean they (dark wizard) would know about the Elder Wand or where it is located seeing as even Voldemort didn’t know for sometime
This is a related topic. The Resurrection Stone tries to kill their master. Just like the other two deathly hallows, it leads their owner at the time to their eventual demise. In the story the second brother was driven to suicide to be with his lover he had brought back because she wasn't happy. It's my belief the shades of people brought back try to kill the owner. The shades of Harry's family lead him to his death too
Harry dropped the resurrection stone in the forest because he knew what damage it could cause in bringing loved ones back from the dead when they were at peace with their deaths and didn't want to be brought back. Though he did call up those whom he loved who had already died in order to help him in his fight with Voldemort he didn't need it after their battle and he could always feel that his loved ones were always watching over him without the use of the stone. Also there would be a lot of people interested in the stone because they felt that it could bring back their dead loved ones. Though the stone could be dug up years after the Battle of Hogwarts by someone who doesn't know what the stone does and understand that it does bring up a shadow of someone who had already passed.
You forgot to mention that he was over the death of his parents. In Philosopher's/ Sorcerer's stone Dumbledore prepped him with the mirror. He said something like its not good to dwell on the mirror because it will keep you from the here and now. Then in Prisoner Lupin was teaching Harry the patronus. Harry kept hearing his parents. He told himself that he'd have to let go of that if he wanted to learn the spell
This video is incorrect. Harry survived Voldemort for two reasons. The resurrection stone works for those who either possess it or were the last to possess it. Secondly, when Voldemort cursed Harry, he ended up killing the horcrux that existed within Harry thus allowing the mortal Harry to survive. This has been confirmed by JKR numerous times.
just thought I'd point out they didn't choose one of three gifts Death presented them, they asked for each gift specifically The Elder Wand given to the eldest brother who craved power, the ressurection stone for the middle brother as he wanted to be reunited with a lost love, and the invisibility cloak to the youngest as he did not fully trust Death's intentions. I have actually read the official story in JK's release of the Tales of Beedle the Bard so yeah. Sorry if that sounded rude or liek I was hassling and it is only a small nit pick just thought I'd let you know in case you didn't. Love your channel keep up the awesome content.
The res stone is the hallow Harry is least equipped to use. He dwelled in front of the Mirror of Erised wishing his parents would return, and the temptations of the stone would be very similar. He knows this and just as he didn’t return to the mirror when Dumbledore explained it to him, he also cast away the stone.
I've often wondered why there is parseltongue, but not any other animal languages. Sure, once in a while a wizard has the natural gift of being able to talk to snakes. Great. But why aren't there other wizards with similar gifts of being able to talk to, say, birds, or fish, or cats, or rodents, or dogs, or insects, or cetaceans, or something else? And why is the ability to talk to snakes seen as a "dark" ability? Snakes aren't evil.
For the last question about it being “evil,” I think it was just because it was associated with the original Salazar Slytherin or other prominent wizards with bad reputations.
The stone is useless to him since he's going to be dead soon himself, but I suspect that he also just didn't want to bring the stone directly to Voldemort and have it taken off his body. The location of the Stone that resurrects the dead taken to the grave by the last person to have used it.
The thing I find crazy is that no one realises that the fact the hallows were real, means that Death was also real, and in a 'living' form for lack of a better term, and judging by the fact he was able to create the hallows, and the power the hallows posses, would make Death the most powerful wizard that ever lived, or didn't live, I don't know, you get what I mean lol
The shades brought by the stone lead the user to their death. Harry's intention was to die. So the shades were comforting to this intent. He dropped the stone because he no longer needed it and wouldn't want it found on his body. Although, if that were the reason, he should discard the invisibility cloak too.
Maybe as a way for Death to pay Harry back for NOT trying to cheat him, as Harry dropped the stone, it rotated and allowed Harry to get fully resurrected after Voldy "killed him". Remember that the stone has to be rotated 3 times to work. As it fell, it rotated 3 times. Death is the one that created the gifts. So it would make sense if Death was being nice and giving a new gift of life to harry.
Never thought of this. I had always looked at it as the Elder Wand refusing to hurt it's master; hence, why Harry was unharmed but Voldemort's soul fragment was destroyed. Nagini (as far as the movies go) was the only soul fragment after this because the spell backfired and also hit Tom.
I always thought he threw it away cause he didn’t want Voldemort to get it. Harry actually thought he was going to die, so it would have sense that Voldemort would have searched his body and found the stone ALONG WITH the invisibility cloak. This would have made Voldemort the master of death in that moment
pretty sure the whole Master of Death thing is just a title and nothing more. Dumbledore even says at one point that Voldy had no interest in the stone since he didn't love anyone enough to want to bring them back anyway and it's not like he'd get a lot of uses from an invisibility cloak. Harry went into that forest expecting to die. I don't think he was too worried about the stone tbh.
I always figured it slipped through his "Numb" and "Sweaty" fingers because he knew he was going to die and was pretty terrified. His heart was hammering and he was probably shaking..
There is just one problem with Harry just 'dropping' the stone. The Summoning Charm. Even if it was buried, all someone would need to do is say: "Accio, Resurrection Stone". There were no enchantments around the stone preventing Accio so if some idiot who was after the Hallows decided to try summoning the stone, he'd have it.
@@khrawbobsyiemlieh7475 can they really confirm the wand was "the most powerful ever created" ? I mean the show plays a lot of characters feelings, Lily's love for Harry for example.. So, imagine the elder brother created a wand, called it the most powerfull wand and people believed him. As the ages go, people still believe it and gets it in their position, their arrogance and belief in themself could in turn, make them stronger than they were when aquiring the wand.
I actually thought Dumbledore gave him the stone to show he didn't keep him alive to just die like Snape said, in the end he gave Harry the stone and that way resurrecting him after he dies from Voldemorts spell and the part of Voldemort had died, the stone saved Harry and he could live on. I really misunderstood it, and now see Dumbledore in a different light. I always thought the resurrection stone was the twist ending that showed Dumbledores compassion and saved Harry.
This is exactly what I thought and am now very confused. I thought the resurrection stone was how Harry was ever even able to return to life after dying. And yes, as you said, that Dumbledore knew all along that Harry would ultimately be able to come back to life after dying in order to fulfill the prophecy.
@@stev6963 the resurrection stone doesn't bring anyone back to life. It's like a limbo state. In the books Harry was able to physically interact with his parents and they were aware they were dead. The resurrected are aware of their death and that they are not alive. Harry knew he was still alive and never died. So even if he died the stone would not have brought him back to life as it only brings thr ghosts or souls. Plus it was impossible for voldemort to kill Harry as the eldar wand cannot harm its own master. The reason it did anything this time was because part of voldemorts soul was in Harry so thr killing curse killed voldemorts soul. During the final duel since no part of voldemort remains in Harry the curse backfires and kills voldemort.
I always figured, along side the Elder Wand, the Resurrection Stone was one of the most cursed objects in existance, both leaving death and misery in their wake, as they do in the tale of the three brothers. If the story is to be believed, Death most likely designed them to do just that
Very true on your assessment. I would like to add among your commentary that Dumbledore also had pre-educated him by his talk towards looking for the mirror in Sorcerer's Stone. Which lines up well with his first game where he caught the snitch in the 1st place. Pretty clever that Dumbledore. 😉
The resurrection stone has so many uses though. Even if it doesn't bring a person fully back from the dead, it can be used, for instance, to interview murder victims, learn history, etc.
Do you think the "spirits" that come from the Resurrection Stone are real? I mean are they really the people that died with all their traits? Or they are some kind of representation of what the one who brings them back thought of them? My question is: James, Lily, Remus and Sirius that Harry saw in the forbidden forest are the actual ones? Or a version of how Harry saw them?
Well there are moving paintings that can sort of carry an essence of someone, and there are ghosts that mostly carry an essence of a person, yet no one claims that these are like a person brought back to life. Ghosts seem to not really grow or learn, they just seem to be an essence or an imprint of what a person was like at the time of their death. The paintings/photos seem to be similar sort of partial snapshots of a person in a moment. The recalled spells from hairy's and voldi's wands seem more full than ghosts or the paintings. They have an awareness and an ability to talk think and plan, but still I think it's mostly just a strong imprint of the real person. I imagine the stone is similar to the above in the fact that it takes a limited imprint of a person and mimics them. I would guess the stone just takes the best and biggest type of imprint of a person, capable of far more nuanced realistic responses. We have something similar in the real world now where a program can read texts and things that a passed person has made and write new texts in a similar style. arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/07/luka-ai-chatbot-speaking-to-the-dead-mind-uploading/
The craziest thing about this is that I literally asked myself this question 20 mins ago then 10 mins later this video gets recommended in my feed lol I’d definitely become the next most powerful dark lord in the wizarding world of it was true
I feel like it was a great lost potential to not have seen what would have happened if all 3 hallows were put together though. Would something crazy have occurred? Maybe they will address it in a prequel.
As I understand, we had to see that when Harry was killed. He inherited the cloak from his family and the stone from Dumbledor. He disarmed malfoy, so he owned the wand. Thecnically he owned all the free artifact. And when he was killed he wasn't speaking to Dumbledor, but death. He greeted death as an old friends, and he didn't know that in that moment, but since he was master of death, he could choose to die or to be back in life.
This was a great video. I think it should be noted that Harry passed this test when he was 11 years old. He used the mirror of erised to be with his family and spent hours with his parents. After learning about the mirror and what brought him there, he moved on as he learned he needed to live in this life, not a life that could have been and thus not really loving at all.
Well, I think the best way to use the Stone is to call for someone you AREN'T attached to, for reasons like questions of the past. That way, there will be little problems with the grief over not being able to properly reunite with lost loved ones before it's time if that's how it's used.
It is no longer necessary to own the stone to recalled loved ones when Harry knows they will always be in his heart. Also, in the tale of the deathly hallows it mentioned that the “ ghost” will become “sad and cold for she did not belong to the mortal world”. Harry doesn’t want that or doesn’t want to humiliate death.
So the Carlin brothers theorized that the Resurrection Stone tempts the caster to kill themselves, or at least accept death more easily when they're about to die. Is it wrong to say that Tom, after turning it thrice probably by accident, saw his mother and was tempted to kill himself. That scared him so much the fear of death stayed with him throughout his entire life.
Harry should have kept it simply as a historical object worth preserving, or should have placed it in Dumbledore's tomb with the Elder Wand. Yes when he confronted Voldy he didn't have too much of a plan for afterwards but he did have the foresight to place the invisibility cloak beneath his robes so should have put the ring with the cloak under his robes.
I know Harry owned all 3 deathly hallows but I’ve only just realised that he owned them all at the same time at the moment of his death and he didn’t die so he was the master of death
I would just like to remind Rowling about how long another artifact lay dormant in another popular fantasy work- an artifact that was eventually discovered. Even among wizards and beasts, nothing stays hidden forever.
The Res Stone always felt like the dud of the Hallows, to me. While not every being who died became ghost, and I seem to even remember Nearly Headless Nick sort of stumble, and cower, when Harry asked if Sirius might come back as one, so we don't strictly know what the criteria are, Ghosts do exist, as do the magical paintings that some deceased people, or else impeccably crafted counterfeits of their personalities, communicate through, making the Stone seem pointless. I almost expect I would have called Dumbledore out on his agreement, since he once so coveted the Deathly Hallows, and even complained that the Elder Wand was "the only one that seemed to think him worthy." Would he have also been so disappointed by the Stone, when ge realized he would get a few words with something resembling his sister, and then nothing? Did he really want to sneak around, and scare people with invisible pranks? Oh well, I know I'm being dismissively hard on several topics, so I'll call it good, but I can see Harry leaving it. Even if it had been more useful, I think by that point, Harry had learned the problems of meddling with power beyond one's ken, and if he was willing to surrender the Elder Wand to obscurity, and eventually oblivion, then why not the Resurrection Stone? Dud keep the Closk, though, I assume.
Even though J. K. Rowling herself has said she thinks that the stone was stepped on by a centaur, I would have myself assumed that it was stepped on by a giant.
I’ve been thinking. I ready the books a few years back so please feel free to remind me of anything I may have missed. If the 3 brothers got the deathly hallows. And the cloak was always passed down the family etc. Surely Harry is related to the 3 brothers. On his Dads side to be specific. I’m 100% missing something lol.
As a matter of fact, he is. The youngest son was Ignotus Peverell, and either his granddaughter or great-granddaughter ended up being the last of his line to bear his name; she, Iolanthe Peverell inherited the Cloak and shared its secret and its tradition with her husband, Hardwin Potter. It has been in the Potter family ever since, the eldest child inheriting it. You missed nothing.
Well, in Cursed Child, in the timeline where Cedric became a Death Eater, Umbridge was still Headmistress and we don’t see or hear about Filch? Could he have seen how evil the Umbitch was and confronted her, but she cast him out into the Muggle world? Sorry if you don’t count Cursed Child as canon, but I like it and I consider it canon.
I'd like to imagine that the Master of Death would be the person who would no longer be infactuated with him or his "gifts". I also have wondered, what would happen if the ressurection stone was thrown through the veil?
I understood after ages that the Three Deathly Hallows just shortened the life of those who owned them, so Death humiliated the Peverell brothers, not the other way around. This shows how much smarter Death is, not only he escaped his humiliation, he also humiliated the owners of the Hallows, who would give up their lives to protect something meant to protect their lives..
Harry Potter dropped the Ressurection Stone, a Deathly Hallow made by Death, allowing the holder to "resurrect the dead." Symbolism for Harry accepting his loved ones' fate, accepting the past, and moving on with the present and the future.
I wish Harry didn't just abandon the stone. Instead, what he should've done was use the stone to help others reconnect with their lost loved ones to say goodbye and get closure. Examples: 1. The Weasleys with Fred 2. Hagrid and his parents 3. Luna and her dad with her mother 4. Aberforth with his siblings and parents 5. Amos Diggory with Cedric 6. Winky with the Crouches 7. Victor Krum and his parents with his grandfather 8. Andromeda Tonks and Teddy with Ted, Nymphadora, and Remus before Teddy starts at Hogwarts 9. Susan Bones & her family with her Aunt Amelia 10. Dennis with Colin
The stone is easily the least desirable out of the 3. Yes, you could bring back a loved one as a shade, but the tale heavily implied that they would be little more than a dark reflection of who they once were, and I like to imagine, they would have become sinister and twisted the longer they have been brought before you. Seeing lost loved ones would be something most of us would want to experience, I think, but the other two have more practical functions. It would be a different story if the stone allowed you to speak to any person who has passed away in totality. You could gain any and all forgotten spells or rituals directly from the wizards and witches who invented them. Even if you did not have dark intentions, it could prove invaluable to those seeking to advance the wizarding world, having access to all legendary wizards and their advice.
I agree that Harry dropped the stone after meeting with his family .... his intention at that moment was to die and join them..... he knew that Voldemort had to kill him to save his friends. He was now ready to die for them, and join his family.
@@ShaneChiswick good question, I however do not have a good answer. It seems to me that someone else has to use it on you. Once you are dead you can not use the stone on yourself (check the story of the three brothers). As it seems to be when Harry was killed he went into a limbo state, perhaps because he was a horcrux of Valdemort and he could go back and claim his own life back. The last horcrux being destroyed. Does that help?
Also please make a video on what Ron, Hermione, Luna, Ginny and Voldemort would have done if they would have had all the three objects of deathly hallows (ressurection stone, elder wand and the invisibility cloak)
as for "could it be found"...i imagine if someone got ahold of the other two, particularly the Wand, they could come up with a "dowsing rod" effect to find the third.
I'm late , but you really helped me out on this one,I couldn't understand y Harry didn't put it in his pocket.thanks for letting me see clearly .Hp theory.Nice vid💯👍
The dialectic answer is: One more instance of the most overused fantasy or science fiction tropes. There is a source of extreme power that the hero must not seek or he becomes the villain. Normally, he’s at least allowed to destroy it. Unlucky or dumb heroes just hide it - allowing a sequel where villain 2.0 finds it.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey guys! Thanks for watching, if you enjoy the content please be sure to like the video and subscribe to the channel.
I'll be releasing another video in just a few hours!
As always, leave your video suggestions down below.
Thanks for making you amazing videos during these hard times.
Related to Deathly Hallows do you think Harry was worthy of the Elder Wand? Even after he broke it with Ron and Hermione as witnesses.
jack rogers In Deathly Hallows Part 2 he did at the very end. Books and movies change all the time.
Your videos are a true gem...I had this doubt why Harry dropped the stone and you cleared it today...Thank you...keep up the good work....
Sooo didn't death ask them what they wanted......... it wasn't a choice from 3 items.
Harry discarding the stone that way shows how much he's grown as a character. In Philosopher's Stone, Harry was enchanted by the Mirror of Erised, going back to look at the images of his family it showed him. He probably would have kept seeking the mirror out had Dumbledore not moved it. Then, with the stone in his possession, he had the power to summon the ghost -like figures of his family once more. He could have succumbed to the temptation to keep the stone and use it regularly, but he chose not to. As you say, the stone had used its purpose for that one moment of comfort and assurance that those he loved were with him and it gave him the courage to continue. He didn't need it anymore. He'd also resigned himself to his death, keeping the stone meant the temptation of being able to use it again might have been enough for him to fight for his life, which is something he couldn't do at that moment.
I'd honestly try to use the resurrection stone to talk to people like the three brothers, Sun Tzu and other historical figures that might lend me their lost wisdom and knowledge.
Alex, your input is exquisite.
@@Gr3nadgr3gory Really? I'd bring Voldemort back to gloat and see just how much fun he was having with his mangled soul in limbo 😉
Dumbledore also gave him the advice to not to forget about living. if he kept the stone he would always be looking back at what was gone rather than looking forward to life
The wand and the cloak are alot more interesting to me then the stone
(If u don’t know) In the book, Harry didn’t break the elder wand but with that wand he repaired his original wand and than he puted the elder wand in Dumbledore’s grave. Also, Harry was related by blood with the youngest brother
I personally like the elder wand getting broken, but Harry putting it back in the grave also works very well
Makes sense why he inherited the cloak
Harry repairs his wand with the elder wand but he does break the wand before he puts it back in Dumbledore's tomb
I'm still mad to this day he didn't repair his own wand in the movie.
@@vladp089 that would have actually made some story continuity. Same way Peeves wasn't in the films even all the house ghosts made their presence known or having nearly headless Nick's death party actually in the films.
I always thought it was simple.
He thought he was going to die and had no reason to hold onto an object to speak with the dead since he was going to join them shortly.
This guy just wants to secure the bag mate, clearly running out of ideas, allow him😂
Well your comment got darker the more I read just like the books and movies..
Did u even watch the video or the movie ? The stone resurrects people it doesn't just show dead people
Walter Latin did YOU watch the video or movie? The stone does NOT resurrect people.
@Iron Man ok mate😂
Me personally, I believe he dropped the stone on purpose. He didn’t want anyone becoming the master of death or heading down that path similar to Voldemort and the original owners.
I agree. In the books Harry asked Dumbledore if he agreed with his decision to drop the stone.
I always saw the stone as leaving behind the last thing that could prevent Harry from accepting his death as necessary. It acted as a Patronus to carry Harry through the dementors, therefore, it's possible, though unlikely, the stone could have dulled, delayed, or prevented Voldemort casting the killing curse. Harry would not have taken the chance...plus..the stone, for Harry, is very much akin to the Mirror of Erised. The lesson has already been learned to not allow the past, even with the best of intentions, to keep him from living in the present. The Stone is a trap, just as The Mirror, and Harry knows to avoid this particular trap very well; being the 3rd version of it he's experienced (the first was when Voldemort promised to bring Harry's parents back).
When did Voldemort promise to bring Harry's parents back?
Tamar, in the Sorcerer's Stone
@@Tyrosine0910 That's the one. 😊
I wanted Snape to appear with them :(..... he deserved one last conversation with harry.....
I thought it would have been nice if Hedwig appeared
Also the other dead weasley twin forgot which brother it was and also moody
He saw his four parental figures. The ones that he missed the most. If every honorable dead person appeared it would be crowded and less emotional imo
@@MrTrondhjem no but like a ghostly white owl just hanging out perched in the background
Fred
I remember the first time I've seen the movie thinking that the invisibility clock from his father was actually a deadly hallow, and that Dumbledore actually made it his purpose to introduce them slowly to Harry (Hence the snitch that only showed when needed and never mentioning the wand), in order to ensure that he won't get corrupted by the power they posses. I think is somehow poetic to think that at one point Harry had all 3 deadly hallows, and if he so wished at the time, he could have kept them to become the most dangerous wizard of all time, if it wasn't for Dumbledore. The fact that he decided to keep only the one that helped him stay humble, and didn't draw any attention to himself, is very consistent with his character, and with the lessons he has learned along the way.
With your Hagrid impression, you should be him in the upcoming Fantastic Beasts sequels, alongside Seamus Gorman as Tom Riddle.
TRUE LULW
SuperCarlinBrothers as his first followers at school
*_*Hannah_** bakeey who??
Alex Downs - Is Tom gonna be in the movie?
Hufflepuff’s Eagle yeah.. no you wouldn't
~5:25 Interesting parellel to the Mirror of Erised. "I must ask you... not to go looking for it again."
I wounded about that myself, and I think you have found the best answer. Harry was essentially a kind, and good person who as Sirius Black said " you're a good person to whom bad things have happened. " This is an important point to remember when you explain why Harry dropped the stone. Thank you for sharing this.
Death eater finds the stone, bring back Voldemort, and JK is back in business
No, because Voldemort died fading away to dust and his soul too because he split his soul so many times and made so many Horcruxes making him less human.
@@ngo9016 read the book🙂
@Mauricio Ortega Stfu
@Mauricio Ortega !!!!
@Mauricio Ortega No i was mocking you because of the exclamation marks. I would picture you being one of those dorks who over-exaggerates and overreacts over things
The reasons start at 4:02 .Before that there is a background on the 3 hallows and brothers.
Always Quality content bro.💕
You included every bit that was needed. 10/10
I think Harry had understood one thing that many great wizards, including Dumbledore did not understand at once - that the dead people are dead. They do not want to come back. They are at peace. Dragging them back would be a horrible thing to do to them . That will be messing the nature's system. When he used the stone, he didn't had the intentions to bring them back to the mortal world. On the contrary he thought that he was going to join them in death. No harm in that.
He also didn't want other people to take the stone. The greed for the Hallows had caused so much war , violence and bloodshed. With his end he wanted to finish that thing which caused so much trouble. He wanted everything to end with him.
Then in like 5 years, Bane or some centaur will just find the stone and just go “Wtf?”
Maybe not in five years, but yeah, there's no reason why the stone wouldn't eventually be found. And that's OK. It's probably the least potentially harmful of all the three hallows. It can't really be used as a weapon, and it can't *really* bring someone back from the dead. The most harm it would do is to the person who tries to use it.
Question: Can the stone "bring back" anyone at all from the dead? Godric Gryffindor? Cadmus Peverell? Merlin? I don't think it can. At least we don't see any evidence of this. We only ever see it bringing back people that the user knows (and presumably loves) personally. That's pretty much the whole point - to bring back lost loved ones, not just any person who's dead.
PhilBagels haha it was a joke, I totally understand what the stone is used for and how it worked.
@@theog7065 Fair enough.
5 years. Seems legit cause next episode is coming in 5 years
Simple really, He was greeting death like an old friend. He was going to see those loved ones forever
Is it possible for someone to learn the general location of where it was dropped in the Forbidden Forest and cast the Accio spell on it?
I don't see why it wouldn't be if Harry was willing to tell them, unless being pressed into the ground by a Centaur means it's buried now (I'm not sure if Accio would still work if it was).
It's likely you cannot accio the stone. Alot of powerful magical objects are un-accio-able. Outside of lore this is probably to stop the spell being too powerful for the plot. Otherwise harry could just accio the horcruxes
it is like the horcruxes you cant y=use the accio spell on them
Twooks harry couldnt use acio because gringotts has powerfull magic and it wouldnt work because of the spells
Not from a Jedi.... wait a minute...
Have you ever considered that since the Elder Wand was loyal to Harry while Harry had the other two Deathly Hallows Harry in essence possessed all three Deathly Hallows?
Dumbledore also once possessed all three
@@bluecrasher7710 not at the same time he only got the stone after giving the cloak to harry
@@crazyice2980 No he had the cloak, elder Wand and the stone before he gave the cloak to Harry I think
Swagulishush Doge the reason he didn’t have a three is because he didn’t get the ring till book 6 half blood prince because of the curse that happened on his arm we know he didn’t get it before he gave the cloak to Harry
Isn’t this exactly why Voldemort killed himself in Harry rather than harry?
Do you think if Harry never dropped the stone or broke the Elder Wand he would have been the most powerful wizard
@Amir Guerouate yes he did he fixed his wand that he loved and put it back with Dumbledore great part of the book
In the books, the Hallows were each indestructible. In the movies, they were destroyed handily, passively even...zero effort required. At least two were. The stone survived in both media. In the book it was because Harry needed the moral comfort of seeing his deceased loved ones one last time before sacrificing his own life to save everyone at Hogwarts. Past that, the Deathstone had no value for him. (In the movie, I'm sure if there had been a means easily at hand by which he could have crushed it to powder, he'd have done so for the sake of consistency.)
Na or possibly
Surely the books are more “reliable” because JK .Rowling wrote the book before the movies were made??
Amir Guerouate he also fixed his wand
I always had the idea that he dropped the stone because he was done with it and since he was expecting to die, he didn't want Voldemort to get it. As for it being found later, so what? Would anyone finding this lying on the ground have any way to know what it was?
never have clicked so fast in my life
He dropped it because his parents told him they were in his heart, so he no longer has any need for the stone.
Harry wanted it over with but there was a very real possibility that Voldemort would have hours of Cruciatus fun with him before finishing him, which in my mind makes him even more brave knowing he might have endured so much more before his death. One of the truest Gryffindors of all time.
I don't think Voldy would have done that because at that point it'd already been established they shared pain on some level.
If you want to be specific, Cadmus wasn't a descendant of the Gaunts, the Gaunts were descended from him. You'd call him their ancestor.
It's OK. JK Rowling made the same booboo in reverse in the first edition of Chamber of Secrets. Following Harry killing the basilisk, Dumbledore tells him Voldemort is the last living ANCESTOR of Slytherin. I believe it was fixed in later printings.
I noticed that too, perhaps he meant Morfin was Cadmus' descendant since he shows a picture of Morfin as he is talking about this? Lol it's a small muck up I reckon
I always thought it was the Stone that stopped him from being killed by Voldemort in the forest.
THE 👏STONE 👏 ONLY 👏 BRINGS 👏 BACK 👏 MEMORIES (sorry if this sounds rude it’s just that people don’t understand this lol)
It'll be hilarious when a random centaur forest creature or dark arts practioner will find the invaluable artifact(!)
The forest creatures wants nothing with wizards' artifacts... and I doubt that some random dark wizard is going to seek any artifact in that forest.
@@varric Except the ones that hate the wizard-kind
There are dark wizard Poachers
They can if Rowling wants.
It seems inevitable that the stone will eventually be found, but I don't think it's that big of a deal. Harry still has the cloak, and will pass it down to his children. Once Harry dies, the wand will never have a true master again, so will essentially be nothing more than an ordinary wand. And the stone can't really do much harm, except psychologically to the person who tries to use it.
Harry dropped the Stone in a clearing at the darkest, deepest heart of the forest, where creatures like Aracnomantula tend to hive. He knew nobody would ever be able to find the stone again (the diadem was hidden similarly and took 1000 years to find).
As for the Elder Wand, harry uses it to repair his own wand, and places it back in Dumbledores tomb. He knew that the day he died, without a successor, the wand would lose all power and become a useless piece of wood (thus ending the Death Sticks bloody trail).
That is true 😂 but doesn’t mean they (dark wizard) would know about the Elder Wand or where it is located seeing as even Voldemort didn’t know for sometime
This is a related topic. The Resurrection Stone tries to kill their master. Just like the other two deathly hallows, it leads their owner at the time to their eventual demise. In the story the second brother was driven to suicide to be with his lover he had brought back because she wasn't happy. It's my belief the shades of people brought back try to kill the owner. The shades of Harry's family lead him to his death too
This
Isn’t that a Super Carlin Brothers theory?
Harry dropped the resurrection stone in the forest because he knew what damage it could cause in bringing loved ones back from the dead when they were at peace with their deaths and didn't want to be brought back. Though he did call up those whom he loved who had already died in order to help him in his fight with Voldemort he didn't need it after their battle and he could always feel that his loved ones were always watching over him without the use of the stone. Also there would be a lot of people interested in the stone because they felt that it could bring back their dead loved ones. Though the stone could be dug up years after the Battle of Hogwarts by someone who doesn't know what the stone does and understand that it does bring up a shadow of someone who had already passed.
Daily uplaods. You're a great man ♥️
You forgot to mention that he was over the death of his parents. In Philosopher's/ Sorcerer's stone Dumbledore prepped him with the mirror. He said something like its not good to dwell on the mirror because it will keep you from the here and now. Then in Prisoner Lupin was teaching Harry the patronus. Harry kept hearing his parents. He told himself that he'd have to let go of that if he wanted to learn the spell
Congratulations on almost getting 100K Subscribers 🎉🎉🎉
@*_*Hannah*_* Mabye🤷
@*_*Hannah*_* 👌
100 thousand sorry had to say it
@@MS-tx6kv I realized I made a mistake so I edited it
now its wrong again xD write 100 k
heh fast again . love that you upload consistantly you make my quarintine better lots of love
This video is incorrect. Harry survived Voldemort for two reasons. The resurrection stone works for those who either possess it or were the last to possess it. Secondly, when Voldemort cursed Harry, he ended up killing the horcrux that existed within Harry thus allowing the mortal Harry to survive. This has been confirmed by JKR numerous times.
just thought I'd point out they didn't choose one of three gifts Death presented them, they asked for each gift specifically The Elder Wand given to the eldest brother who craved power, the ressurection stone for the middle brother as he wanted to be reunited with a lost love, and the invisibility cloak to the youngest as he did not fully trust Death's intentions. I have actually read the official story in JK's release of the Tales of Beedle the Bard so yeah.
Sorry if that sounded rude or liek I was hassling and it is only a small nit pick just thought I'd let you know in case you didn't. Love your channel keep up the awesome content.
@Dunkbuscus Gaming
I dont think that rude, it is a fair call to point that out.
The res stone is the hallow Harry is least equipped to use. He dwelled in front of the Mirror of Erised wishing his parents would return, and the temptations of the stone would be very similar. He knows this and just as he didn’t return to the mirror when Dumbledore explained it to him, he also cast away the stone.
The one ring was once forgotten...
Here’s a question, why is it that animals don’t seem to be able to talk?
Actually I think that animagi can
In book 4 it says that wormtail talked to the rats to find Voldy
I've often wondered why there is parseltongue, but not any other animal languages. Sure, once in a while a wizard has the natural gift of being able to talk to snakes. Great. But why aren't there other wizards with similar gifts of being able to talk to, say, birds, or fish, or cats, or rodents, or dogs, or insects, or cetaceans, or something else? And why is the ability to talk to snakes seen as a "dark" ability? Snakes aren't evil.
For the last question about it being “evil,” I think it was just because it was associated with the original Salazar Slytherin or other prominent wizards with bad reputations.
The stone is useless to him since he's going to be dead soon himself, but I suspect that he also just didn't want to bring the stone directly to Voldemort and have it taken off his body. The location of the Stone that resurrects the dead taken to the grave by the last person to have used it.
The thing I find crazy is that no one realises that the fact the hallows were real, means that Death was also real, and in a 'living' form for lack of a better term, and judging by the fact he was able to create the hallows, and the power the hallows posses, would make Death the most powerful wizard that ever lived, or didn't live, I don't know, you get what I mean lol
I think that is the myth behind the hallows, not how they actually were created.
Great video!!! Keep it up
Love ur vids!
The shades brought by the stone lead the user to their death. Harry's intention was to die. So the shades were comforting to this intent. He dropped the stone because he no longer needed it and wouldn't want it found on his body. Although, if that were the reason, he should discard the invisibility cloak too.
Maybe as a way for Death to pay Harry back for NOT trying to cheat him, as Harry dropped the stone, it rotated and allowed Harry to get fully resurrected after Voldy "killed him".
Remember that the stone has to be rotated 3 times to work. As it fell, it rotated 3 times. Death is the one that created the gifts. So it would make sense if Death was being nice and giving a new gift of life to harry.
Never thought of this. I had always looked at it as the Elder Wand refusing to hurt it's master; hence, why Harry was unharmed but Voldemort's soul fragment was destroyed. Nagini (as far as the movies go) was the only soul fragment after this because the spell backfired and also hit Tom.
I always thought he threw it away cause he didn’t want Voldemort to get it. Harry actually thought he was going to die, so it would have sense that Voldemort would have searched his body and found the stone ALONG WITH the invisibility cloak. This would have made Voldemort the master of death in that moment
Yes I thought the same and still think. Also he was going to join his loved ones (when he dies) so there was no need to hold on
Mhmm I thought both those things, I do believe thought that it had bigger meaning
pretty sure the whole Master of Death thing is just a title and nothing more. Dumbledore even says at one point that Voldy had no interest in the stone since he didn't love anyone enough to want to bring them back anyway and it's not like he'd get a lot of uses from an invisibility cloak. Harry went into that forest expecting to die. I don't think he was too worried about the stone tbh.
I always figured it slipped through his "Numb" and "Sweaty" fingers because he knew he was going to die and was pretty terrified. His heart was hammering and he was probably shaking..
There is just one problem with Harry just 'dropping' the stone. The Summoning Charm. Even if it was buried, all someone would need to do is say: "Accio, Resurrection Stone". There were no enchantments around the stone preventing Accio so if some idiot who was after the Hallows decided to try summoning the stone, he'd have it.
Death wasn't actually death, that was just the story according to Dumbledore. The brothers made the hallows because they were gifted
Then who created the elder wand, the most powerful Wand ever existed
@@khrawbobsyiemlieh7475 the brother did
@@khrawbobsyiemlieh7475 Oliver Wandel
@@khrawbobsyiemlieh7475 can they really confirm the wand was "the most powerful ever created" ?
I mean the show plays a lot of characters feelings, Lily's love for Harry for example..
So, imagine the elder brother created a wand, called it the most powerfull wand and people believed him.
As the ages go, people still believe it and gets it in their position, their arrogance and belief in themself could in turn, make them stronger than they were when aquiring the wand.
@@MrEagorath nice theory
I actually thought Dumbledore gave him the stone to show he didn't keep him alive to just die like Snape said, in the end he gave Harry the stone and that way resurrecting him after he dies from Voldemorts spell and the part of Voldemort had died, the stone saved Harry and he could live on. I really misunderstood it, and now see Dumbledore in a different light. I always thought the resurrection stone was the twist ending that showed Dumbledores compassion and saved Harry.
This is exactly what I thought and am now very confused. I thought the resurrection stone was how Harry was ever even able to return to life after dying. And yes, as you said, that Dumbledore knew all along that Harry would ultimately be able to come back to life after dying in order to fulfill the prophecy.
@@stev6963 the resurrection stone doesn't bring anyone back to life. It's like a limbo state. In the books Harry was able to physically interact with his parents and they were aware they were dead. The resurrected are aware of their death and that they are not alive. Harry knew he was still alive and never died. So even if he died the stone would not have brought him back to life as it only brings thr ghosts or souls.
Plus it was impossible for voldemort to kill Harry as the eldar wand cannot harm its own master. The reason it did anything this time was because part of voldemorts soul was in Harry so thr killing curse killed voldemorts soul. During the final duel since no part of voldemort remains in Harry the curse backfires and kills voldemort.
I always figured, along side the Elder Wand, the Resurrection Stone was one of the most cursed objects in existance, both leaving death and misery in their wake, as they do in the tale of the three brothers. If the story is to be believed, Death most likely designed them to do just that
Very true on your assessment. I would like to add among your commentary that Dumbledore also had pre-educated him by his talk towards looking for the mirror in Sorcerer's Stone. Which lines up well with his first game where he caught the snitch in the 1st place. Pretty clever that Dumbledore. 😉
The resurrection stone has so many uses though. Even if it doesn't bring a person fully back from the dead, it can be used, for instance, to interview murder victims, learn history, etc.
@@royaltyfree9607 Murder victims famously never have any loved ones
Question: Why Harry dropped the resurrection stone in the forest
Answer: Because it didn't belong to him and he did not need it....
it was just a better version of the mirror of Erised and Harry had already learned the lesson of dwelling on bringing back his loved ones.
Do you think the "spirits" that come from the Resurrection Stone are real? I mean are they really the people that died with all their traits? Or they are some kind of representation of what the one who brings them back thought of them? My question is: James, Lily, Remus and Sirius that Harry saw in the forbidden forest are the actual ones? Or a version of how Harry saw them?
The stone was orignally given by Death so I believe they were them or at least an aspect of them.
Amelia Shephard it wasn’t actually death that made these items. death was just a metaphor
Well there are moving paintings that can sort of carry an essence of someone, and there are ghosts that mostly carry an essence of a person, yet no one claims that these are like a person brought back to life. Ghosts seem to not really grow or learn, they just seem to be an essence or an imprint of what a person was like at the time of their death. The paintings/photos seem to be similar sort of partial snapshots of a person in a moment. The recalled spells from hairy's and voldi's wands seem more full than ghosts or the paintings. They have an awareness and an ability to talk think and plan, but still I think it's mostly just a strong imprint of the real person. I imagine the stone is similar to the above in the fact that it takes a limited imprint of a person and mimics them. I would guess the stone just takes the best and biggest type of imprint of a person, capable of far more nuanced realistic responses. We have something similar in the real world now where a program can read texts and things that a passed person has made and write new texts in a similar style. arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/07/luka-ai-chatbot-speaking-to-the-dead-mind-uploading/
Man, you're amazing!
The craziest thing about this is that I literally asked myself this question 20 mins ago then 10 mins later this video gets recommended in my feed lol
I’d definitely become the next most powerful dark lord in the wizarding world of it was true
Same here
Google listens
I was waiting for another video
No one asks but, Voldemort is half-blood, feared a half-blood, defeated by a half-blood who's get supported by a half-blood
Harry goes to die while carrying the cloak, while Voldemort has the Elder wand, now ask again, why would Harry drop the stone?
Elder wand and the stone are completely useless, but the invisibility cloak is the only useful thing in the series.
I feel like it was a great lost potential to not have seen what would have happened if all 3 hallows were put together though. Would something crazy have occurred? Maybe they will address it in a prequel.
As I understand, we had to see that when Harry was killed. He inherited the cloak from his family and the stone from Dumbledor. He disarmed malfoy, so he owned the wand. Thecnically he owned all the free artifact. And when he was killed he wasn't speaking to Dumbledor, but death. He greeted death as an old friends, and he didn't know that in that moment, but since he was master of death, he could choose to die or to be back in life.
This was a great video. I think it should be noted that Harry passed this test when he was 11 years old. He used the mirror of erised to be with his family and spent hours with his parents. After learning about the mirror and what brought him there, he moved on as he learned he needed to live in this life, not a life that could have been and thus not really loving at all.
Well, I think the best way to use the Stone is to call for someone you AREN'T attached to, for reasons like questions of the past. That way, there will be little problems with the grief over not being able to properly reunite with lost loved ones before it's time if that's how it's used.
It is no longer necessary to own the stone to recalled loved ones when Harry knows they will always be in his heart. Also, in the tale of the deathly hallows it mentioned that the “ ghost” will become “sad and cold for she did not belong to the mortal world”. Harry doesn’t want that or doesn’t want to humiliate death.
Hmmm when will my dad give me his invisibility cloak
So the Carlin brothers theorized that the Resurrection Stone tempts the caster to kill themselves, or at least accept death more easily when they're about to die. Is it wrong to say that Tom, after turning it thrice probably by accident, saw his mother and was tempted to kill himself. That scared him so much the fear of death stayed with him throughout his entire life.
Yo keep up the good work
The 1 dislike was from Voldemort.
Edit: there was one dislike at the time of writing this comment
The 6 other are from death eaters
The other 12 we're from belltrix Lestrange and 11 death eaters
there are more and more dislikes, it looks like the ministries compromised again
Sharose Khan lol
Harry should have kept it simply as a historical object worth preserving, or should have placed it in Dumbledore's tomb with the Elder Wand. Yes when he confronted Voldy he didn't have too much of a plan for afterwards but he did have the foresight to place the invisibility cloak beneath his robes so should have put the ring with the cloak under his robes.
I know Harry owned all 3 deathly hallows but I’ve only just realised that he owned them all at the same time at the moment of his death and he didn’t die so he was the master of death
I would just like to remind Rowling about how long another artifact lay dormant in another popular fantasy work- an artifact that was eventually discovered. Even among wizards and beasts, nothing stays hidden forever.
How on earth_ so many uploads :D!
Actuallly they asked for the Things. The death wasnt like you have the Choice between These 3.
Yeah, this guy didn't do his research.
The Res Stone always felt like the dud of the Hallows, to me. While not every being who died became ghost, and I seem to even remember Nearly Headless Nick sort of stumble, and cower, when Harry asked if Sirius might come back as one, so we don't strictly know what the criteria are, Ghosts do exist, as do the magical paintings that some deceased people, or else impeccably crafted counterfeits of their personalities, communicate through, making the Stone seem pointless. I almost expect I would have called Dumbledore out on his agreement, since he once so coveted the Deathly Hallows, and even complained that the Elder Wand was "the only one that seemed to think him worthy." Would he have also been so disappointed by the Stone, when ge realized he would get a few words with something resembling his sister, and then nothing? Did he really want to sneak around, and scare people with invisible pranks? Oh well, I know I'm being dismissively hard on several topics, so I'll call it good, but I can see Harry leaving it. Even if it had been more useful, I think by that point, Harry had learned the problems of meddling with power beyond one's ken, and if he was willing to surrender the Elder Wand to obscurity, and eventually oblivion, then why not the Resurrection Stone? Dud keep the Closk, though, I assume.
First being one of the best starwars channels now one of the best Harry Potter channels
Even though J. K. Rowling herself has said she thinks that the stone was stepped on by a centaur, I would have myself assumed that it was stepped on by a giant.
The ending scared the hell out of me😂
I’ve been thinking. I ready the books a few years back so please feel free to remind me of anything I may have missed.
If the 3 brothers got the deathly hallows. And the cloak was always passed down the family etc. Surely Harry is related to the 3 brothers. On his Dads side to be specific.
I’m 100% missing something lol.
As a matter of fact, he is. The youngest son was Ignotus Peverell, and either his granddaughter or great-granddaughter ended up being the last of his line to bear his name; she, Iolanthe Peverell inherited the Cloak and shared its secret and its tradition with her husband, Hardwin Potter. It has been in the Potter family ever since, the eldest child inheriting it. You missed nothing.
You should do:
Why did filch like umbridge so much?
Well, in Cursed Child, in the timeline where Cedric became a Death Eater, Umbridge was still Headmistress and we don’t see or hear about Filch? Could he have seen how evil the Umbitch was and confronted her, but she cast him out into the Muggle world? Sorry if you don’t count Cursed Child as canon, but I like it and I consider it canon.
Alex Downs no. Professor McGonagal was headmistress. Jo Rowling said that Hermoine put Umbridge in Azkaban
Alex Downs and Cedric was dead long before the battle of Hogwarts. Did you actually read the books, or only that?
I'd like to imagine that the Master of Death would be the person who would no longer be infactuated with him or his "gifts". I also have wondered, what would happen if the ressurection stone was thrown through the veil?
Dumbledore taught Harry right with the Mirror of Erised
I understood after ages that the Three Deathly Hallows just shortened the life of those who owned them, so Death humiliated the Peverell brothers, not the other way around. This shows how much smarter Death is, not only he escaped his humiliation, he also humiliated the owners of the Hallows, who would give up their lives to protect something meant to protect their lives..
Yet the third welcomed death like an old friend after useing the cloak to live a long life.
1) The brothers did not choose their hallows.
2) Harry left the stone because he thought he was going to his final death.
I believe whoever in the vicinity of the stone will eventually see what Harry seen but they're lost love ones instead you know.
5:43 Because nothing buried has ever been found. 🙄
Harry Potter dropped the Ressurection Stone, a Deathly Hallow made by Death, allowing the holder to "resurrect the dead."
Symbolism for Harry accepting his loved ones' fate, accepting the past, and moving on with the present and the future.
I wish Harry didn't just abandon the stone. Instead, what he should've done was use the stone to help others reconnect with their lost loved ones to say goodbye and get closure. Examples:
1. The Weasleys with Fred
2. Hagrid and his parents
3. Luna and her dad with her mother
4. Aberforth with his siblings and parents
5. Amos Diggory with Cedric
6. Winky with the Crouches
7. Victor Krum and his parents with his grandfather
8. Andromeda Tonks and Teddy with Ted, Nymphadora, and Remus before Teddy starts at Hogwarts
9. Susan Bones & her family with her Aunt Amelia
10. Dennis with Colin
The stone is easily the least desirable out of the 3. Yes, you could bring back a loved one as a shade, but the tale heavily implied that they would be little more than a dark reflection of who they once were, and I like to imagine, they would have become sinister and twisted the longer they have been brought before you. Seeing lost loved ones would be something most of us would want to experience, I think, but the other two have more practical functions.
It would be a different story if the stone allowed you to speak to any person who has passed away in totality. You could gain any and all forgotten spells or rituals directly from the wizards and witches who invented them. Even if you did not have dark intentions, it could prove invaluable to those seeking to advance the wizarding world, having access to all legendary wizards and their advice.
Maybe it will also help anyone in need for courage like it did with harry against voldy. As it lays in a very dangerous forest right now..
I agree that Harry dropped the stone after meeting with his family .... his intention at that moment was to die and join them..... he knew that Voldemort had to kill him to save his friends. He was now ready to die for them, and join his family.
Why did Harry not stay dead?
@@ShaneChiswick he had a choice to return or go to a new adventure......
@@donaldmcdaniel1773 so by just touching the stone - he could be resurrected?
@@ShaneChiswick good question, I however do not have a good answer. It seems to me that someone else has to use it on you. Once you are dead you can not use the stone on yourself (check the story of the three brothers). As it seems to be when Harry was killed he went into a limbo state, perhaps because he was a horcrux of Valdemort and he could go back and claim his own life back. The last horcrux being destroyed. Does that help?
@@donaldmcdaniel1773 awesome response
Me: I want a peaceful normal life.
2020:
Also please make a video on what Ron, Hermione, Luna, Ginny and Voldemort would have done if they would have had all the three objects of deathly hallows (ressurection stone, elder wand and the invisibility cloak)
as for "could it be found"...i imagine if someone got ahold of the other two, particularly the Wand, they could come up with a "dowsing rod" effect to find the third.
Directly to the answer without the things you already know, 4:00
I'm late , but you really helped me out on this one,I couldn't understand y Harry didn't put it in his pocket.thanks for letting me see clearly .Hp theory.Nice vid💯👍
The dialectic answer is: One more instance of the most overused fantasy or science fiction tropes. There is a source of extreme power that the hero must not seek or he becomes the villain. Normally, he’s at least allowed to destroy it. Unlucky or dumb heroes just hide it - allowing a sequel where villain 2.0 finds it.
Loved the way they portrayed his death scene in the book. Movies downplay it
Can you do a video about each of the hallows.
That and it had been attached to a Horcrux. I wouldn't want to hold onto the thing knowing that.