IT S SO SAD BUT ALL NEED BATTERY WITH LOT AMP LIKE 12VOLT DEEP CYCLE BATTERY 500A NEED ABOUT LIKE 12 OF THEM I SURE WILL WORK 12VOLT DEEP CYCLE BATTERY 500A SO 500A x 12 =6000 Amp it can run the dam car lol not need Lithium battery
@@Fred-F4 I think I remember in high school chemistry that trees breathe in burnt cobalt, lithium, and other metals from EV fires and breathe it out into oxygen while using it to grow wood.
Highly toxic chemicals are released in the atmosphere when these pos burn. They need to quit wasting so much water putting one these vehicles out even the run off water is highly toxic. Just let the damn things burn themselves out.
We need more education on putting out EV fires. Dumping water on or under the battery is not a useful method. Spikes for piercing and flooding the battery put the the fire out in 10 minutes. That and the blanket to hold flames back work marvels.
@@danharold3087 All of it's unnecessary, and at the behest of flawed policy and "science". Best solution is to get rid of the mandates, and ensure technology is mature enough for the market, rather than foist expensive mistakes at the behest of contextual fraud.
@@DHW256 We should be prosecuting oil and even utility companies for spending billions to perpetuate the status quo. As far back as the EV1 Chevron/Texaco bought up the patents for the Nickel Metal Hydride batteries used in the EV1 to stop the electric car transition. The guy driving an EV and charging at home on solar power, paying no power bill, is not just a nightmare for the US power industry. He is also a symbol of the future. A future where clean energy and sustainable transportation are the norm.
No, EVs are not more prone to fires compared to their gas-fueled and hybrid counterparts. It’s worth mentioning that vehicles powered by electricity are only 0.03% likely to catch fire. This risk is significantly less likely than gas-powered vehicles and hybrid vehicles, which have a 1.5% chance and a 3.4% chance of catching fire respectively. Batteries will get better but petrol will always burn.
@@BioniqBobyour stats are not ok because there are way less ev cars in ghe wirld so it should be in proportion less ev fires but lately what you see is ev catching fire hundreds of videos. Probabilisticaly not making sense. And another thing is that fire in petrol cars can take tine to spread but in ev is so fast that you cant escape.
@@jadbiz BLAW BLAW BLAW Hybrids reflected the most at 3,475 fires per 100,000 vehicles. ICE vehicles caught fire at 1,530 incidents per 100,000 vehicles. EV fires were 25 fires per 100,000 vehicles.
No, EVs are not more prone to fires compared to their gas-fueled and hybrid counterparts. It’s worth mentioning that vehicles powered by electricity are only 0.03% likely to catch fire. This risk is significantly less likely than gas-powered vehicles and hybrid vehicles, which have a 1.5% chance and a 3.4% chance of catching fire respectively.
I live in an apartment. It is scary because one person could destroy other cars too. I don't have a EV. I don't want an EV. But other people in my parking garage do.
Look for the videos of electric scooters, bikes, hover boards, segways, etc that people bring indoors and charge. Then the battery explodes in fire in an apartment or house! It's the same technology. The scariest vid I saw was the guy bringing his e-bike into an elevator. It burst into flames after the doors closed! Yikes!😮☹😲😖😳
@Falkor82 At least we are watching events that have actually happened on video, to decide for ourselves. Why is that OPEC propaganda? They didn't post the videos. Did you watch the e-scooter in the elevator that I mentioned? Pretty damned scary from my firefighter/EMT perspective. I've got nothing against EV's. I've got a problem with a dummy in the White House shutting down our petroleum industry, independence, jobs, and National Security when EV's are nowhere near ready to replace petroleum products. It still has a long way to go, but we'll get there. Just not soon enough for the alarmists. You're the one who has been duped by global climate propaganda.
If you do buy one and the battery is at the end of its life, probably cheaper to just park it in a flood area before a heavy rain and collect the insurance.
The cells themselves are sealed. The issue is the salt from salt water shorts out the terminals. Once that happens it damages the seal and poof goes the ev.
They are waterproof, but they're not boats. They're only waterproof for splashes and such, and not for driving in deep water. People that do, are idiots.
all need to run motor of car is battery with lot Amp ok 12volt deep cycle battery 500A now you can have 10 12volt deep cycle battery 500A each 500 time 10 =5,000A to run motor of car ok like really not need Lithium battery ok they fooling you all lol
I was told by a firefighter that they store EV cars that have been in an accident for atleast a month ,fully submerged in a water tank . These tanks are 100 feet apart so that one burning dosen't Start the others on fire . Look what happened to that car freighter ship off the coast of the Dutch coast , burned for along time with no way to extinguish it!
@@lawrencecarberry1399Last February I witnessed a Tesla that couldn't crest a hill in the cold. He was near the top with his 4 way flashers on. If only he turned off the heater he could have made it over.
Correct. EV batteries are more susceptible to spontaneous combustion if water intrusion has occurred. Most EV's have their batteries mounted under the car, just a few inches above the road, making water intrusion during rainy weather a possibility. Also as noted by fire departments, EV fires burn very hot and have proven impossible to extinguish. Therefore an EV fire would have the potential to cause more proximity damage if in a parking garage or carport. Also, EV's cost more to purchase and repair and therefore are more expensive to insure.
The one of many concerns I have with EV's is the Electrical connections and how they will be protected from Salt corrosion in the Northern states but also in deep southern states. Even if they are all sealed connections this does not mean they would not leak in a flooded condition. All the energy that is normally stored in a fuel tank of Gas or Diesel is now in a battery so once it is on fire it will stay that way until it burns it self out.
salt water? these cars have been catching fire from the start, salt water, normal water and no water at all.Dont let the mainstream media propaganda take over tour brain. Focusing only on salt water is their way of minimizing the dangers of these cr-ap, dangerous cars.
It is not a normal kind of fire; the cells in the battery are discharging their energy all at once, and from what I have seen, it's difficult at best to put out such a 'fire'. One Firefighter team said they spent 20 000 gallons of water and were unable to quench the fire burning in one of these EV's.
lol they are dumb not need Lithium battery you can used 12volt deep cycle battery 500A ok to run motor of car you need about 10 12volt deep cycle 500A Battery to run 4 motor in car lol it will work ok more Amp in battery run much longer lol
You know,it’s a negative for sure, but it’s so rare, it is a drop in the ocean. The benefits immensely outweigh the negatives. I,v seen my share of car engines on fire at the side of the road.
Big business thinks of people as sheep, it's easy to steer people in the direction you want, with just a few persuasive claims about EV's. ... Foolish people are followers
There are 190'000 reasons not to buy an ICE car. That's the number of ICE cars that caught fire in the US 2022, according to the NTSB. There were 4200 EV fires in the US over the same period.
@@Brian-om2hh More than 250 Million ICE vehicles in the US. Around 2.5 Million EVs in the US... That's 100:1. Now let's extrapolate: 4,200 EV fires * 100 = 420,000 fires if we had as many EVs as ICEs. That's more than double the rate of fire. This is why statistics is taught in college, and why lefties use raw numbers instead of statistics to push their agenda. When you actually account for differences, it just sinks their narrative -- just like yours, here.
I think eventually they will start charging a "recycle fee" on Ev's. Not only will you have to pay to buy them but when you get rid of them you will have to pay to have them recycled.
GM sent out that warning about not parking inside a garage or parking structure, and parking fifty feet away from any building, because the insurance companies won’t pay for that building when it burns down.
For several years, San Francisco's streets have doubled as a test track for hundreds of driverless cars , they have crashed with a firetruck, more than 70 instances of these autonomous vehicles interfering with emergency responders. San Francisco Fire Department has generated some 55 accident reports documenting autonomous vehicles meandered into fire and emergency scenes with no way to get the vehicles to leave.
Electric car people should have to wear a face mask to prevent the spread. Then they should have to get quarterly injections to help them stay "normal". Oh, yeah, they already do. Trust the science.
Thing you should know as an EV owner you are responsible for any fire damage caused by your vehicle. It takes days of monitoring to put one out completely. So get the biggest policy you can get. As a lot of EV use the battery pack as a structural member any hit could start a fire at later date post accident as it takes one one damaged cell to start a fire.
@@ThroughTheHaze would you allow me to force you to eat anchovies? I don't understand why you believe the government is your master, your leader. They are " representatives" for the people, it's disgusting to watch you bow down because it's easier. No I'm not anti-government, just sick of watching the sheep advocate for a ruler...
I like the advice this video gives: (potentially) water-damaged EVs must be parked at least 50 feet away from other structures (lest it catch fire and burn your house down). How many such places exist in modern cities, least of all within walking distance of one's home? Even parked out on a street is probably not far enough since you are probably going to be parked with other cars. Should those cars be other EVs then guess what is going to happen if your car ever DOES catch fire?
EV has about half the parts count of a gas car, but yet these EVs cost 2 to 5 times as much.?? Someone is make huge profit on these simple cars. Ev's also have their own type of pollution ( gases from Lithium or Ultium batteries, including other specialized automotive grade batteries) and are known to expel highly toxic gases both when charging and discharging now this will add to our already polluted air. On top of that, the total operating cost of these EV's is extremely high in the long run. ... No thanks, I'll pass ... I don't want to add to the problem by adding even more toxins to the environment.
5 year Total Cost of Ownership for a Tesla Model 3 is less than a Toyota Camry or Corolla. There is no off-gassing from Lithium batteries, unlike lead acid batteries which produce flammable hydrogen gas. EV's are not 2-5 X more expensive, they are almost at cost parity with their equivalent gas cars, and dropping every year.
So stupid to roll out these evs without safety regs. Charging in a garage is foolish. Very toxic fumes if it catches on fire. Evs are too heavy for older parking garages and older bridges. Eventually one will catch on fire under an apartment complex. A disaster waiting to happen. Just a matter of time.
@@gifthorse3675 Nearly half of all car fires happen when the cars are parked. Ford has recalled more than 600.000 vehicles recently because the cars could catch fire after being parked.
EV cars burn twice as hot. Once they catch fire their is no stopping it. A gas car may catch fire, but that doesn't mean the whole car will burn up unless a fuel line is compromised
EVs that have been submerged can pop off like a fire cracker!🧨 EVs submerged in a garage during a hurricane have been known to cause more damage than the storm!
The words of authority:- ". . . Park it 50 feet from any structure and take it in for service". The words of wisdom:- "OI! don't bring that flooded-out EV into my workshop mate, it might catch fire and burn the building down!" I'm keeping my diesel car until EV's have safe batteries.
Would be interesting to know whether a 'service' would include removal of the huge batteries to check that the entire sealing is in tact and all cells and interconnections have not been contaminated 🤨.
The engineering is going to have to catch up to the realities of operating EVs…. I am sure that vital electrical connections are already made to be waterproof, but clearly, more needs to be done to ENSURE that all electrical connections are fully waterproof even if a vehicle is submerged. EV batteries are just too finicky and dangerous if not properly protected.
If any car is flooded with salt water, you are better off if it burns! Everyone saw that hurricane coming, they should have known to get in their Tesla and get out of town. Big surprise salt water and a high capacity battery don’t mix!
No one thinks that in a flood a gas car engine gets damaged. Water does go up the exaust into the engine block and ruins the engine or at least a costly repair.
If a hurricane is coming and they tell you the water is going rise why don’t you leave for a few days? The house is going to be trashed anyway. Then come home and throw all your stuff away if the home is still there.
@@daveassanowicz186it will a week later when your ev is parked in the garage and it decides to catch on fire 🔥🔥🔥 they aren't talking about cars catching on fire while they are under water
EV lithium-ion batteries contain a FLAMMABLE electrolyte that can result in fire or even explosions if they are punctured, damaged, or heated. ------ The electrodes are submerged in a liquid called an electrolyte, which allows for the movement of ions and consists of lithium salt and organic solvents. It is these ORGANIC solvents which are the leading fire hazard in Li-ion batteries.
The one part that confuses me is why they put the batteries on the bottom of the car? It means less of the car needs to be in water to actually submerge the batteries
@@email6743I agree even though electric cars are not in the best state they can be right now (battery technology), things will not improve if attention isn't given to the problem. Here is a bonus for you guys The lost century and how to reclaim it by Dr Steven Greer. The full documentary can be found on youtube if you type full video at the end. I promise your time will not be wasted. It's about lost free energy devices. Hope it helps.
I know a lot of people really wanted EV's to be the best solution to limiting carbon emissions from cars, but in reality they're not. There's still no viable reason why EV's should be rushed into production and mandated by 2035. ICE and EV's can coexist until technology is able to safely comply with political convictions.
I agree completely. I would still absolutely drive an electric vehicle, especially one with self driving. They are a very simple drive train with instant torque, not many parts to fail besides cells & body/interior components. Don't get me wrong, any machine breaks. There are manufacturer defects. But I would definitely by an EV if there was a truck since im electrician by trade. The only option is the Rivian which isnt terrible, but a "normal" looking truck is what I'm looking for. I dont need people asking me questions about my vehicle everywhere i go... plus all of the electric trucks on the market are ugly af. (Conservative btw, not just some liberal pushing a narrative... governments need to stop pushing EVs, let the market decide imo)
all E-Car owners need to be aware when they go through a deep puddle that is dangerous' if the water reaches the sill the battery compartment is flooded and water bridges between the + & - terminals and shorts them out risking fire, I'm anti-E-Car so I'm biased in my views but if you own one think twice about using them in winter and wet conditions, and never go through a deep puddle or a water-ford on a road, electricity and water don't mix well,
Yes, gasoline cars start on fire, but once the fire is out it stays out. EV's are known to reignite on the way to the impound lot and after they sit for a while.
@@smedleyfarnsworth263 The stats show that ICE fires are much more frequent than EV fires, and that's based on pro rata numbers. But yes EV fires are much more intense.
Get down on the ground with a flash light and check for rust. Someone I once knew bought his kid a nice used car. Had it a few months. Went to back out of drive and car made a thud and quit moving. Started ok. The under side had completely rusted out snd something major gave out. $10,000 wasted. Rebuilt title. IMO it was a hurricane Katrina car bought at auction by a dealer who sold in a different state without disclosing the cause for the title.
I might, maybe, possibly, cut the authorities some slack for mis-calculating what this technology would do. After all, they were persuaded by enthusiastic fools, ideologues and profit-driven tech companies to take this path. But somewhere just about now, they are supposed to admit that the EV initiative was a mistake.
@@PyroShields Perhaps I should clarify. The speed of the EV initiative was a mistake. Your remarks have verified that the people at the control panel have foolishly insisted on rapid, break-neck deployment, of a primitive technology. It would be dandy if the Powers That Be would be honest about the limitations of what they have foisted upon us.
@@marbanak You may think it's "rapid" but we are slow behind. We are less than 10% EV's where other countries like Norway is predicted to be 100% in 2025 and China is currently at 60%.. I get it some of you don't like them just like smart phones weren't liked by everyone 15 years ago. People hate changes but you can get with the program or get left behind.
Defective cars sold at outrageous prices! Manufacturer should be liable for all cost involved. Insurance should not have to cover manufacturer defects or negligence.
So EV car drivers MUST bring their cars to garage to flush out batteries with clean water. It's just stupid to believe it's safe after drive in salt water for a while. Salt will make electric bridges and can cause shortcuts. If they don't let their EV inspected, they're playing with fire and also violated the road safety. Their cars are like ticking bombs.
I know nothing about EV batteries... Would you actually flush them with water? I would think this would require complete removal of the battery and replacement? Or maybe just some type of cleaning process? Either way, it sounds expensive.
An EV fully charged will run for a whole day.
An EV fully engulfed in flames will burn for a whole day too.
And then you have the extra bonus of it reigniting days later, so you get double the fun.
We know a thing or two, because we've seen a thing or two.
IT S SO SAD BUT ALL NEED BATTERY WITH LOT AMP LIKE 12VOLT DEEP CYCLE BATTERY 500A NEED ABOUT LIKE 12 OF THEM I SURE WILL WORK 12VOLT DEEP CYCLE BATTERY 500A SO 500A x 12 =6000 Amp it can run the dam car lol not need Lithium battery
@@bobby1970"We Are Farmers! *Cue Jingle*
All of their carbon emissions are stored for a 1 time use.
And it’s great for the environment too. Anyone reporting on what goes into the atmosphere when an EV burns?
it burns very clean though 😂
@@Fred-F4 I think I remember in high school chemistry that trees breathe in burnt cobalt, lithium, and other metals from EV fires and breathe it out into oxygen while using it to grow wood.
If you specifically look for carbon emissions from a burning EV on a search engine you get nothing related to this topic.
@@brent4073I really hope your joking.
Highly toxic chemicals are released in the atmosphere when these pos burn. They need to quit wasting so much water putting one these vehicles out even the run off water is highly toxic. Just let the damn things burn themselves out.
This is what the government WILL NOT tell you on the big push of EVs and fire department DON’T have equipment to put them out😮
Bidenomics
We need more education on putting out EV fires. Dumping water on or under the battery is not a useful method. Spikes for piercing and flooding the battery put the the fire out in 10 minutes. That and the blanket to hold flames back work marvels.
@@danharold3087 All of it's unnecessary, and at the behest of flawed policy and "science". Best solution is to get rid of the mandates, and ensure technology is mature enough for the market, rather than foist expensive mistakes at the behest of contextual fraud.
@@DHW256 We should be prosecuting oil and even utility companies for spending billions to perpetuate the status quo. As far back as the EV1 Chevron/Texaco bought up the patents for the Nickel Metal Hydride batteries used in the EV1 to stop the electric car transition.
The guy driving an EV and charging at home on solar power, paying no power bill, is not just a nightmare for the US power industry. He is also a symbol of the future. A future where clean energy and sustainable transportation are the norm.
Thats because too many " money people " have too much invested in them.!!!
Yes EVs do explode without warning and there’s almost nothing you can do about it except don’t buy one!
No, EVs are not more prone to fires compared to their gas-fueled and hybrid counterparts.
It’s worth mentioning that vehicles powered by electricity are only 0.03% likely to catch fire. This risk is significantly less likely than gas-powered vehicles and hybrid vehicles, which have a 1.5% chance and a 3.4% chance of catching fire respectively. Batteries will get better but petrol will always burn.
@@BioniqBobyour stats are not ok because there are way less ev cars in ghe wirld so it should be in proportion less ev fires but lately what you see is ev catching fire hundreds of videos. Probabilisticaly not making sense. And another thing is that fire in petrol cars can take tine to spread but in ev is so fast that you cant escape.
@@jadbiz BLAW BLAW BLAW
Hybrids reflected the most at 3,475 fires per 100,000 vehicles.
ICE vehicles caught fire at 1,530 incidents per 100,000 vehicles.
EV fires were 25 fires per 100,000 vehicles.
@@jadbiz PER 100,000
Sleep tight with all those EVs in the parking garages under buildings..😢
electrical fires can't melt steal beams
EVs are not allowed into the garage where I am staying.
Bidenomics
😂😂😂😂😂🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
No, EVs are not more prone to fires compared to their gas-fueled and hybrid counterparts.
It’s worth mentioning that vehicles powered by electricity are only 0.03% likely to catch fire. This risk is significantly less likely than gas-powered vehicles and hybrid vehicles, which have a 1.5% chance and a 3.4% chance of catching fire respectively.
This is terrifying if you park your EV in your garage. Could burn your whole house down with your family in it.
I live in an apartment. It is scary because one person could destroy other cars too. I don't have a EV. I don't want an EV. But other people in my parking garage do.
Look for the videos of electric scooters, bikes, hover boards, segways, etc that people bring indoors and charge. Then the battery explodes in fire in an apartment or house! It's the same technology. The scariest vid I saw was the guy bringing his e-bike into an elevator. It burst into flames after the doors closed! Yikes!😮☹😲😖😳
@Falkor82 which propaganda do you listen too? Ev propaganda perhaps?
@Falkor82 At least we are watching events that have actually happened on video, to decide for ourselves. Why is that OPEC propaganda? They didn't post the videos. Did you watch the e-scooter in the elevator that I mentioned? Pretty damned scary from my firefighter/EMT perspective. I've got nothing against EV's. I've got a problem with a dummy in the White House shutting down our petroleum industry, independence, jobs, and National Security when EV's are nowhere near ready to replace petroleum products. It still has a long way to go, but we'll get there. Just not soon enough for the alarmists. You're the one who has been duped by global climate propaganda.
Exploding overpriced gulf cart shitbox driven by smug brain washed wieners thinking they’re saving the planet. What could possibly go wrong 🤪🤪🤪
Really feel like this relationship with EVs is just not working out
I'm hoping we can figure out the hydrogen internal combustion engine!
Another case of we warned you. Look at the bus fires of electric busses around the world..terrifying.
Yeah and they're putting kids on those busses
Another reason for home schooling !!!
I know right? gas cars never catch fire.
@nickg2561 No, they do just not as likely as an EV, which makes them even less safer
@@anticorporatists9959 and the fire can be put out with water
Reason # 8965 to not ever buy an elec vehicle
If you do buy one and the battery is at the end of its life, probably cheaper to just park it in a flood area before a heavy rain and collect the insurance.
EVs are stupid
reason 1 thru 8964 legacy car makers told me not to so I complied like sheep.
@@nickg2561 the sheep are the ones who buy into the "plan" that ev's are better.
@@vinceruland9236 Greedy oil companies like people like you.
EVs should not be allowed in enclosed parking areas...
How are these things not water proof already?! This is insane. I'm never buying an EV.
It probably is and that salt water intrusion was an exception they didn't factor into their contingency factors.
You’d think that would be a priority
The cells themselves are sealed. The issue is the salt from salt water shorts out the terminals. Once that happens it damages the seal and poof goes the ev.
They are waterproof, but they're not boats. They're only waterproof for splashes and such, and not for driving in deep water. People that do, are idiots.
Wrong
A rise in EVs and a rise in worldwide flooding events, what a great cocktail
Bidenomics
By catching fire they dry out alot quicker.
it's not funy but lmao thanks
Hah. I laughed.
I mean yes that dries quicker that way. In other words, when you're right, you're right😂😂😂
Yes brilliant
It's a feature not a bug 😋
Feel very Sorry for our Fire Fighters this is so Dangerous!
Unfortunately they are collateral damage when it comes to government agenda.
The owners should be fined for allowing their car to become someone else's danger.
But 1 ton of burning lithium is great for my neighbours to breathe
all need to run motor of car is battery with lot Amp ok 12volt deep cycle battery 500A now you can have 10 12volt deep cycle battery 500A each 500 time 10 =5,000A to run motor of car ok like really not need Lithium battery ok they fooling you all lol
I was told by a firefighter that they store EV cars that have been in an accident for atleast a month ,fully submerged in a water tank .
These tanks are 100 feet apart so that one burning dosen't Start the others on fire .
Look what happened to that car freighter ship off the coast of the Dutch coast , burned for along time with no way to extinguish it!
Maybe I'm being paranoid but I dont park anywhere near an EV I just dont trust them.
You like living in a yellow submarine
Not paranoid at all , more likely just smarter than the average bear .....
I mean the same thing can happen with a regular car lol...
A regular car? No not a chance.
@@TheAircool1 say's he who has never changed a tyre ever
What about road salt in the winter 🥶
batteries dont like cold weather
Fire
@@lawrencecarberry1399Last February I witnessed a Tesla that couldn't crest a hill in the cold. He was near the top with his 4 way flashers on. If only he turned off the heater he could have made it over.
One truth we've learned since we were children that electricity and water do not mix that's a simple principle of physics rather a law of physics.
When expectations do not meet reality. The push for ideals over rational thought comes at a cost always. This was not an unforeseeable safety issue.
Bidenomics!!!!
They knew the fire risk,and built the crap anyway. Engineers my ass.
If any other product caught fire as often as EV’s do the government would be calling for a recall instead of continuing to encourage their purchase.
It's not so much about how often they catch fire. It's more about the fact that they can't be put out. 😢
The govt doesn't just encourage, they actually subsidize the buying of EVs by $7500.
@@andrewthomas695 That too.
Yep
like the vax
So exactly how much is it going to cost us in exorbitant insurance rates and electric bills to be an EV nation by 2035? This is freaking ridiculous.
Just imagine a battery operated school bus full of kids. Bad news!
Yes and Americans are worried about school Shootings,??????
The best way to deal with EV's is to not own one.
@@passing_bye5991 That changes my comment how?
That is not much help if you live in an apartment block in which other occupants own EVs (or electric bikes or scooters).
Actually for a lot less money, I can buy a gas car and use the savings to buy free gas for years.
Not like gasoline is any safer
@@okamijubei You go on believing that if it gives you comfort. In the meantime those of us that can see reality will follow the real facts.
Thank you for informing people of this danger , these batteries burn at well over 2200 degrees Fahrenheit …. Again thank you .
Correct. EV batteries are more susceptible to spontaneous combustion if water intrusion has occurred. Most EV's have their batteries mounted under the car, just a few inches above the road, making water intrusion during rainy weather a possibility. Also as noted by fire departments, EV fires burn very hot and have proven impossible to extinguish. Therefore an EV fire would have the potential to cause more proximity damage if in a parking garage or carport. Also, EV's cost more to purchase and repair and therefore are more expensive to insure.
They told us electric vehicles are the future of transportation. Apparently not!
Well they are. Maybe lithium is not because they are flammable but they already have sodium-ion batteries which do not catch on fire.
they are full of BS
@@lawrencecarberry1399 That's what they said about smart phones 15 years ago.
If it weren't for the technology having a leash on it, we would be somewhere with it.
The future is hell lol
I'll be sticking with my diesel.
47 mpg and about 750 miles range, and 5 minutes to refuel.
👍
Same here👌
And as a testdriver i can clearly say that an EV will never be in my possesion.
The amount of struggle is real.
You are the reason the world is going to Parrish from global warming so selfish
Amen!
That is BS. 47/mpg on a diesel. Stop your bs.
One more reason not to own an electric vehicle 😳🥺🫣
The one of many concerns I have with EV's is the Electrical connections and how they will be protected from Salt corrosion in the Northern states but also in deep southern states. Even if they are all sealed connections this does not mean they would not leak in a flooded condition. All the energy that is normally stored in a fuel tank of Gas or Diesel is now in a battery so once it is on fire it will stay that way until it burns it self out.
Its okay, they will ban you from driving soon once salf driving cars are more on the road. :(
Not only that, but batteries really hate the cold. 😂
They will ALL corrode.
salt water? these cars have been catching fire from the start, salt water, normal water and no water at all.Dont let the mainstream media propaganda take over tour brain. Focusing only on salt water is their way of minimizing the dangers of these cr-ap, dangerous cars.
Funny how they are nearly all Teslas
Maybe because Tesla outsell every other EV 10:1.
It is not a normal kind of fire; the cells in the battery are discharging their energy all at once, and from what I have seen, it's difficult at best to put out such a 'fire'.
One Firefighter team said they spent 20 000 gallons of water and were unable to quench the fire burning in one of these EV's.
You have to keep it under a heavy duty blanket for weeks to ensure it doesn’t re-ignite.
on the bright side, these EV cars make great heaters when salt water is added
@@user-cs5rr1it9l ah, you know the cars from BYD in China
@@user-cs5rr1it9l
Blue ones?
The salt story needs to be taken with a grain of salt...Look at the EVs catching on fire on the ocean.
😂
Burn EVs not solar panels.
electric cars are dangerous this happened quite often the main stream media won't report this
lol they are dumb not need Lithium battery you can used 12volt deep cycle battery 500A ok to run motor of car you need about 10 12volt deep cycle 500A Battery to run 4 motor in car lol it will work ok more Amp in battery run much longer lol
You know,it’s a negative for sure, but it’s so rare, it is a drop in the ocean. The benefits immensely outweigh the negatives. I,v seen my share of car engines on fire at the side of the road.
it happens about a 1/1000 as often as with an ICE car.
@@kennthbrowne7051😂😂
@@terrymckenzie8786that's funny and totally incorrect!
Big business thinks of people as sheep, it's easy to steer people in the direction you want, with just a few persuasive claims about EV's. ... Foolish people are followers
It's just another reason not to buy an EV.
There are 190'000 reasons not to buy an ICE car. That's the number of ICE cars that caught fire in the US 2022, according to the NTSB. There were 4200 EV fires in the US over the same period.
@@Brian-om2hhSthu tree hugger. 🙄
@@Brian-om2hh More than 250 Million ICE vehicles in the US. Around 2.5 Million EVs in the US... That's 100:1. Now let's extrapolate: 4,200 EV fires * 100 = 420,000 fires if we had as many EVs as ICEs. That's more than double the rate of fire. This is why statistics is taught in college, and why lefties use raw numbers instead of statistics to push their agenda. When you actually account for differences, it just sinks their narrative -- just like yours, here.
@@Brian-om2hhhow many ICE elsewhere compare to EV? EV is ticking bomb compare to ICE because it self ignite
@@Brian-om2hh95% of vehicles on the road are ICE. Guess you also can't understand the per capita of those who commit the most crimes, as well, huh?
How many toxic cancer causing chemicals are in the smoke coming of that EV?
how many people get sick from breathing in gas and diesel.?
I think eventually they will start charging a "recycle fee" on Ev's. Not only will you have to pay to buy them but when you get rid of them you will have to pay to have them recycled.
Like the core charge when you buy certain replacement parts. You have to bring them the bad part so they can recycle/refurbish it.
Except almost no one has the capability to recycle them...
I will never be caught driving one of these death traps!!!
I'd be paying for my own death!
Enjoy the E-Bus
Gas cars catch fire every 17 seconds in the US.
GM sent out that warning about not parking inside a garage or parking structure, and parking fifty feet away from any building, because the insurance companies won’t pay for that building when it burns down.
very simple fix dont buy one you cant fix stupid
For several years, San Francisco's streets have doubled as a test track for hundreds of driverless cars , they have crashed with a firetruck, more than 70 instances of these autonomous vehicles interfering with emergency responders. San Francisco Fire Department has generated some 55 accident reports documenting autonomous vehicles meandered into fire and emergency scenes with no way to get the vehicles to leave.
They are really junk
Bottom line: Florida just isn't an ideal place for EVs.
wonder how well they do in the northern states that have lots of water on the road after a snow and the roads have tons of salt on them.
All those tiny batteries are such a bad joke. Would never park one in my garage. Firemen refuse to buy them!
Imagine a flooded parking lot with maybe hundreds of burning vehicles.
Underground parking in NYC. OY!
With a big storm.
Awesome !
Stay 1000 feet away at all times from electric cars.
I don’t want one even parking anywhere near my vehicle
Electric car people should have to wear a face mask to prevent the spread. Then they should have to get quarterly injections to help them stay "normal".
Oh, yeah, they already do. Trust the science.
Also recommend staying 1000 feet away from the liberal driver at all times as well!
that s easy never buy one
Thing you should know as an EV owner you are responsible for any fire damage caused by your vehicle. It takes days of monitoring to put one out completely. So get the biggest policy you can get. As a lot of EV use the battery pack as a structural member any hit could start a fire at later date post accident as it takes one one damaged cell to start a fire.
More than days, they can go back up even after months.
They wil stay lit, on fire, for hours even underwater with no source of oxygen
I agree. But this is being forced upon us. Like in Cali for example. Eventually we will have no choice!
We need hydrogen powered vehicles. I think they might actually be safer than lithium battery powered vehicles.
@@ThroughTheHaze would you allow me to force you to eat anchovies? I don't understand why you believe the government is your master, your leader. They are " representatives" for the people, it's disgusting to watch you bow down because it's easier. No I'm not anti-government, just sick of watching the sheep advocate for a ruler...
If EV owners could park 5 miles away from the rest of us sensible people, that would be great.
Ooo look at you edgy.
@@jordangriffith9102 what model tesla you have?
@@jordangriffith9102 Oh speaking of edgy. Those emos would love these cars.
Your talking about Ecars but I bet you drive a straight fuckin beater. Stfu
All drivers
Many parking garages are posting signs. NO ELECTRIC CAR PARKING.
Lol so how does that work, some idiot parks near me the parking lot floods and everyone within 50ft is screwed?
It’s called a hurricane puts your car underwater from a storm surge
Add that into the carbon footprint of electric cars.
I like the advice this video gives: (potentially) water-damaged EVs must be parked at least 50 feet away from other structures (lest it catch fire and burn your house down). How many such places exist in modern cities, least of all within walking distance of one's home? Even parked out on a street is probably not far enough since you are probably going to be parked with other cars. Should those cars be other EVs then guess what is going to happen if your car ever DOES catch fire?
Don't believe I would even want to spend the night in a motel if an EV was parked in front.
And just to think the government is pushing for all EV by 2035
Imagine some unsuspecting small kids playing around it.
They should've known water and electricity don't mix.
The problem here is not exactly water and electricity, but Lithium and water, that is an explosive combination.
@andyr8812 Didn't know that ,still scary.
So, you don't have a washing machine, a kettle, or an electric shower in your home then?
@Brian-om2hh WHAT ! I dont submerge them in water . Did you read the news article?
Who would buy one, don’t park next to an EV
EV has about half the parts count of a gas car, but yet these EVs cost 2 to 5 times as much.?? Someone is make huge profit on these simple cars. Ev's also have their own type of pollution ( gases from Lithium or Ultium batteries, including other specialized automotive grade batteries) and are known to expel highly toxic gases both when charging and discharging now this will add to our already polluted air. On top of that, the total operating cost of these EV's is extremely high in the long run. ... No thanks, I'll pass ... I don't want to add to the problem by adding even more toxins to the environment.
To be fair there are newer models that will be comparable if not cheaper in the 20K range
5 year Total Cost of Ownership for a Tesla Model 3 is less than a Toyota Camry or Corolla. There is no off-gassing from Lithium batteries, unlike lead acid batteries which produce flammable hydrogen gas. EV's are not 2-5 X more expensive, they are almost at cost parity with their equivalent gas cars, and dropping every year.
So stupid to roll out these evs without safety regs. Charging in a garage is foolish. Very toxic fumes if it catches on fire. Evs are too heavy for older parking garages and older bridges. Eventually one will catch on fire under an apartment complex. A disaster waiting to happen. Just a matter of time.
If your ICE car catches on fire in your garage, you can safely breathe in the fumes 😂
A gas car is not just going to catch fire in the garage unless it’s running.
@@Tschacki_Quackiyep, another child Tesla fanboy..
@@gifthorse3675 Nearly half of all car fires happen when the cars are parked. Ford has recalled more than 600.000 vehicles recently because the cars could catch fire after being parked.
EV cars burn twice as hot. Once they catch fire their is no stopping it. A gas car may catch fire, but that doesn't mean the whole car will burn up unless a fuel line is compromised
EVs that have been submerged can pop off like a fire cracker!🧨 EVs submerged in a garage during a hurricane have been known to cause more damage than the storm!
EVs and floods dont mix
😢 remember to keep your emergency pack in your EV at all times! Marshmallows and hot dogs.
Wise-*** LOL
How about not buying an EV?
You are right, not buying a EV. The strip mining alone will be worse for the planet, then drilling for oil!
😂😅
Something not considered- EV's in Northern States that are exposed to deicing salt. This is pretty much the same as
being exposed to salt water.
Imagine taking one of these evs to the carwash and this happens 😂
I love when this happens.
These things are dangerous and need to be banned.
Agreed 👍🏻
The words of authority:- ". . . Park it 50 feet from any structure and take it in for service".
The words of wisdom:- "OI! don't bring that flooded-out EV into my workshop mate, it might catch fire and burn the building down!"
I'm keeping my diesel car until EV's have safe batteries.
Would be interesting to know whether a 'service' would include removal of the huge batteries to check that the entire sealing is in tact and all cells and interconnections have not been contaminated 🤨.
They tried to rush this tech when it wasn't ready for widespread use... 😮
Rush? LOL dude we are less than 10%. Norway is over 90% and China is over 60%. We need 10 years to catch up to Norway.
Insurance companies will not want to insure these cars.
95 percent of EV's are still on the road. The other 5 made it home.
Ha Ha Ha ha 🤣
The engineering is going to have to catch up to the realities of operating EVs…. I am sure that vital electrical connections are already made to be waterproof, but clearly, more needs to be done to ENSURE that all electrical connections are fully waterproof even if a vehicle is submerged. EV batteries are just too finicky and dangerous if not properly protected.
In China they water test Teslas here apparently they do not.
This is yet another reason why ev's are a scam period.
... Becouse why exactly? I wasnt aware gas vehicles never went up in flames.
I’ve been driving this scam for 5 years I guess 😂, 80k miles, never had a fire, generated my own propulsion energy with solar panels on my house.
Personal automobiles are the scam, brother. Watch Not Just Bikes
Because it's such a great idea to buy an ICE car that has been flooded with salt water? Yeah right...
@@ejp1we can only hope..
If any car is flooded with salt water, you are better off if it burns! Everyone saw that hurricane coming, they should have known to get in their Tesla and get out of town. Big surprise salt water and a high capacity battery don’t mix!
No one thinks that in a flood a gas car engine gets damaged. Water does go up the exaust into the engine block and ruins the engine or at least a costly repair.
@@sailorx72 yes but it doesn't catch fire and possible burn your house down
@LHS2369 your house is gonna burn down when it's under water? 😂
If a hurricane is coming and they tell you the water is going rise why don’t you leave for a few days? The house is going to be trashed anyway. Then come home and throw all your stuff away if the home is still there.
@@daveassanowicz186it will a week later when your ev is parked in the garage and it decides to catch on fire 🔥🔥🔥 they aren't talking about cars catching on fire while they are under water
I can never sleep tightly at night with an EV sitting in my garage. Fact.
Imagine the carnage if a Pinto and a Tesla merged!
Hmmmmm but the Tesla would have to resend the Pinto? Ford doesn't make Pintos anymore!!!
Ban all of them
As ususal, money first safety second.
Please deliver the wreckage to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington D.C.
Insurance is going to kill EV's! The Dutch Oven effect!
I'm sure the other 299.998 damaged vehicles that weren't Teslas, don't have any influence...
Maybe this is why General Motors suddenly destroyed their entire inventory of electric vehicles back in the 70s.
EV lithium-ion batteries contain a FLAMMABLE electrolyte that can result in fire or even explosions if they are punctured, damaged, or heated. ------ The electrodes are submerged in a liquid called an electrolyte, which allows for the movement of ions and consists of lithium salt and organic solvents. It is these ORGANIC solvents which are the leading fire hazard in Li-ion batteries.
READ THE OWNERS MANUAL.
EVs are not to be driven in the rain!!!
Or parked on flooded streets.
The one part that confuses me is why they put the batteries on the bottom of the car? It means less of the car needs to be in water to actually submerge the batteries
@@KaosNova2 Batteries are very heavy. It lowered the center of gravity and makes the car more stable.
This is why I NEVER park my car near ANY electric vehicle. And who is going to buy a used electric vehicle?
If you own an electric car, you deserve the consequences.
Oh yea you can't afford one
@@barnabasannius827 Too smart to be duped into buying one!
Either grow with the change or be left behind. I still know people who refused to learn how to type.
@@email6743I agree even though electric cars are not in the best state they can be right now (battery technology), things will not improve if attention isn't given to the problem. Here is a bonus for you guys The lost century and how to reclaim it by Dr Steven Greer. The full documentary can be found on youtube if you type full video at the end. I promise your time will not be wasted. It's about lost free energy devices. Hope it helps.
@@email6743with how much problems it has well they going to need more protection than that.
In coatal cities salt water is in the air. My aunts Cadillac slowly rusted at her condo in Florida from the salt moisture in the air.
You’ll be able to get a EV cheap after the flooding. Fire sale
I have a burning desire to get one.
@@farnthboy a hot ta’ hot a burning car yea
I know a lot of people really wanted EV's to be the best solution to limiting carbon emissions from cars, but in reality they're not.
There's still no viable reason why EV's should be rushed into production and mandated by 2035.
ICE and EV's can coexist until technology is able to safely comply with political convictions.
This is what happens when you have idiots running the government
I will not comply.
I agree completely. I would still absolutely drive an electric vehicle, especially one with self driving. They are a very simple drive train with instant torque, not many parts to fail besides cells & body/interior components.
Don't get me wrong, any machine breaks. There are manufacturer defects. But I would definitely by an EV if there was a truck since im electrician by trade. The only option is the Rivian which isnt terrible, but a "normal" looking truck is what I'm looking for. I dont need people asking me questions about my vehicle everywhere i go... plus all of the electric trucks on the market are ugly af.
(Conservative btw, not just some liberal pushing a narrative... governments need to stop pushing EVs, let the market decide imo)
No electric for me noway
Electric cars burst into flames when they get wet?
That's a great investment in the future.
all E-Car owners need to be aware when they go through a deep puddle that is dangerous'
if the water reaches the sill the battery compartment is flooded and water bridges between the + & - terminals and shorts them out risking fire, I'm anti-E-Car so I'm biased in my views but if you own one think twice about using them in winter and wet conditions, and never go through a deep puddle or a water-ford on a road, electricity and water don't mix well,
Yes, gasoline cars start on fire, but once the fire is out it stays out. EV's are known to reignite on the way to the impound lot and after they sit for a while.
174000 gas fires in 2022 took a hell of a lot more total water than the EV's that were reported to catch on fire.
That is scary. My neighbor has one. I don't want one.
@@wdbldr67 Now lets talk about the concept of pro rata numbers.
@@smedleyfarnsworth263 The stats show that ICE fires are much more frequent than EV fires, and that's based on pro rata numbers.
But yes EV fires are much more intense.
@@jtr82369 Publish those stats and the scource on here, so that they may be subjected to scrutiny.
Get to the real problem our waterways and supplies will become polluted from the heavy metals.
This is not the kind of vehicle that should be pushed by government. Who wants to drive a dangerous vehicle?
Hipsters Hippies and fashion following people
Get down on the ground with a flash light and check for rust. Someone I once knew bought his kid a nice used car. Had it a few months. Went to back out of drive and car made a thud and quit moving. Started ok.
The under side had completely rusted out snd something major gave out. $10,000 wasted. Rebuilt title.
IMO it was a hurricane Katrina car bought at auction by a dealer who sold in a different state without disclosing the cause for the title.
People shouldn't waste money on electric vehicles. They are all hyped up to be saving you money and saving the environment. That's BS!!!!
Well JB, so much for your idea for American's driving SAFE EV'S!
I might, maybe, possibly, cut the authorities some slack for mis-calculating what this technology would do. After all, they were persuaded by enthusiastic fools, ideologues and profit-driven tech companies to take this path. But somewhere just about now, they are supposed to admit that the EV initiative was a mistake.
EV's are the future maybe litihium is not. They also have sodium-ion batteries which are not flammable.
Oh come on your not being hip and trendy!
@@PyroShields Perhaps I should clarify. The speed of the EV initiative was a mistake. Your remarks have verified that the people at the control panel have foolishly insisted on rapid, break-neck deployment, of a primitive technology. It would be dandy if the Powers That Be would be honest about the limitations of what they have foisted upon us.
@@marbanak You may think it's "rapid" but we are slow behind. We are less than 10% EV's where other countries like Norway is predicted to be 100% in 2025 and China is currently at 60%.. I get it some of you don't like them just like smart phones weren't liked by everyone 15 years ago. People hate changes but you can get with the program or get left behind.
Who could have seen this coming ? 😅
Defective cars sold at outrageous prices! Manufacturer should be liable for all cost involved. Insurance should not have to cover manufacturer defects or negligence.
I'd feel safer sleeping next to a shielded nuclear reactor than with an EV charging in my garage. 🔥
Same.
I don't think those batteries like water.
No battery likes water
ABC will still push electric cars.
Pull the seatbelt all the way out and look at end for water marks.
So EV car drivers MUST bring their cars to garage to flush out batteries with clean water. It's just stupid to believe it's safe after drive in salt water for a while. Salt will make electric bridges and can cause shortcuts. If they don't let their EV inspected, they're playing with fire and also violated the road safety. Their cars are like ticking bombs.
Modern electric bridges are known as drawbridges …
I know nothing about EV batteries... Would you actually flush them with water? I would think this would require complete removal of the battery and replacement? Or maybe just some type of cleaning process? Either way, it sounds expensive.
@sking2173 do draw bridges have batteries?
@@francismarion6400 - Some toy ones have batteries. 😁
You would have to replace the battery.
Resale of these vehicles should be banned.