Psst! Don't forget that rule #2 applies to ALL causes and effects. And to clear up any ambiguity, the fuel gauge glowing, the gravitometer spinning, and the helium tank rattling count as both causes and effects.
I had a different problem with rule #2 - I mentally rephrased it as "multiple causes in conjunction produce no effect" which technically implies an exclusive-or relation when multiple causes have one effect (or vice versa), which makes the riddle unsolvable :(
I had all my letters with the right things I put D as nothing(?) and didn’t think that rule #2 applied to the car malfunctioning but when I found out in the video I quickly figure out which one was correct. I’m giving myself 70/100
@@trevorvergesart The key is in rule 2: No Effect is produced by multiple causes in conjunction. #6 reads "Shortly after the Fuel gauge Glows and the Gravitometer spins, the reactor leaks". **This does not mean that both the Fuel gauge and the Gravitometer need to be both going off simultaneously to cause the leak**, as such a requirement would break the rule. It is possible that they both cause reactor leaks (the same way thrusters B and C both cause the Fuel Gauge to glow), but they cannot require the other to do so. Once rule 2 is understood than the implications of notes 5 and 6 are clear - if the Gravitometer caused reactor leaks, then it would ALWAYS cause them, Fuel Guage be darned. That means that in note 5, the Gravitometer should be causing a reactor leak. Yet the Gravitometer is spinning and no reactor leak in sight. This means that the Gravitometer doesn't cause reactor leaks, so in note 6, the Fuel gauge is responsible. The same concept can be applied to note 5 itself to show that the Helium tank, not the Gravitometer, is responsible for the ignition explosion and the oxygen depletion, since if the Gravitometer was causing them, it would also cause them in note 6. Thus, any thruster that sets off the heilum tank is a no go, since it will cause ignition explosion and oxygen depletion. Also, any thruster that sets off the Fuel Guage is ALSO a no go since it causes reactor leaks. Setting off the Gravitometer is a-ok, though, since we just proved it does nothing.
The fallacy with our answers, mine being the same as OP's, was that we assumed that the gravitometer was the key factor in causing the critical failure, when instead we should have ruled it out because it was the common factor that had no effect on it's own, i.e. we ignored the rule that stated if a cause showed no effect independently, it would cause no effect even when present simultaneously with any other cause.
Imagine how annoyed these people must be to put out these riddles trying to help us think better, but then when they go to comments, all they see is people complaining about how theyll never be able to solve these.
We all complain about how they are to solve but imagine the amount of double checking, making just the right rules, and brainpower involved in making them. The creators are literal geniuses
Ah yes, I turned on only D for the first 2 seconds of the run, then at the last second, turned on E, and, although I hated the gravitometer spinning, got the win.
Me: Drives, looks at time on my phone, literally crashes and dies. Ted Ed character: drives, comes up with a total plan, makes a table, still wins and scratchless WTF??!!!!
edit: I realized my mistake and now know what went wrong. Where I got lost was the fact that, i assumed the effects rules only applied to rockets via problems. But it turns out it also applies to the problems via hazards. I feel like this specific riddle was a little bit unclear as it says that he was certain that the failures were causes of chain reactions from the thrusters 1:11 so the fact that when the gravitometer spins & the helium tank rattles, the ignition explodes and the oxygen levels deplete so the 'chain reaction' of the helium tank rattling and the gravitometer spinning creates the catastrophe. Therefore as long as you didn't trigger both of them you'd be fine no? this led me to conclude the opposite of the final answer as both had the gravitometer spinning so as long as i didn't use that no chain reaction would take place and id be safe. so i could activate 'a, b, c, & d'
I found the same answer using the same logic. For me, the notes implied that while activating 1 thruster may trigger 2 different reaction (random exemple : thruster D making the Helium Tank Rattle and the Fuel Gauge glow), the fatal errors where caused by the combination of the different problems (aka the reactor leaks ONLY if you trigger both the Fuel Gauge AND the Gravitometer) So yeah, that one riddle was confusing, especially since there are 5 thrusters and it ask you to use as many as you can, so using 4 of them seemed way more intuitive than only 2
Same, and I believe we are correct in this if the premises is, as said, a chain reaction... instead of using only the spin as they did, I concluded that if "rattle + spin = boom + no-O2" and "glow + spin = leak", then I could not use either the thrusters that cause rattle or glow in conjunction with spin, yet nothing points to them not being used together, so spin would be the one to avoid, hence no E
Took me a while to figure out the answer: D and E. (I would've crashed way before solving it). Good riddle IMO. Rule #2 and rule #3 are important to understand since they state that "No effect is produced by multiple causes in conjuction" and "different causes may separately lead to the same effect" This means that for clue #1 the fuel gauge glow CANNOT be due to BOTH B and C being turned on. Either (Option 1)B makes the glow and C does not, (Option 2)C makes the glow and B does not, or (Option 3) they both make the glow independently. The video clearly shows the last option. Similarly in clue #5 the ignition exploding and oxygen levels depleting CANNOT be due to BOTH the rattle and spin. Either (OP. 1) the rattle causes the explosion and the spin causes depletion, (OP. 2) the rattle causes depletion and the spin causes explosion, (OP. 3) the rattle causes both the explosion + depletion, (OP.4) the spin causes both the explosion + depletion, or (OP.5) they both cause the explosion + depletion independently. It's neither the first two nor the last two options. In clue #6 the gravitometer spins but there is neither an explosion nor an oxygen depletion. So the rattle must be the cause of explosion + depletion. This is fine because rule #4 states "a single cause can lead to multiple effects."
I’m moving at 200 miles an hour and I have to solve this in less than 5 seconds before crash falling in a ravine of toxic waste *lets read the instructions*
You see, this is a riddle I like. It doesn't require you to have an understanding of complex math and it actually utilizes its story for the riddle instead of the story being just a backdrop.
@@Artaxerxes.your assumption has absolutely no concrete grounds or evidence. It’s also degrading. Geez give this person a break. It’s the kind of riddle I appreciate too, because I can appreciate a high stakes underdog race story
I had an assignment like that in 11th grade math, my answer was the thought process of not pushing the buttons that are involving the part of ABD, ADE, and CDE, my teacher loved it 😊
I got a different answer, I thought the spinning gravitometer in combination with the helium tank/fuel gage caused a different outcome. So as long as the gravitometer does not spin, nothing will go wrong. I deduced that E caused the meter to spin, so A, B, C, D can all be activated.
I made the same mistake. I thought the combination rule only applied to thrusters and not to the effects themselves, hence I was using the same logic as you.
Notice how they worded it in the visual demonstration, “factor” not “thruster”, and the rules also say “cause” not “thruster”. You guys made assumptions, not a good things to do to solve riddles.
0:49 "...your uncle was a notorious tinkerer, and the system still had some kinks to work out" Considering the name "Slate (K)anoli", I can see that he put those kinks in for relatability, if you know what i mean. ;)
I managed to solve this one correctly, but to do so I had to make one critical assumption that wasn't explicitly stated: that the test notes were exhaustive and included any and all symptoms that occurred (e.g. if the fuel gauge isn't mentioned, it definitely didn't glow during that test run). In other words, I had to assume that absence of evidence = evidence of absence, which typically isn't reliably true.
But there is a logic problem, B and C make the thing glow, when on together, but it says, more than one cause, doesn’t give the result. So B and C cannot both be the cause for the glowing
@@Tacholoco You've misread the rules. They say that more than one cause can independently give the same result (x *or* y causes z). What can't happen is for an effect to be triggered by two causes when neither cause alone does it (x *and* y causes z).
...lose and you'll forfeit your uncle and ALL of his other creations! Me: he made the x ray tshirt! A rocking chair that ACTUALLY rocks?! I cant let this happen!😤 *looks at snow speedo* Me: scratch that, yall can keep him💀 isnt bad enough we have to deal with that in the SUMMER?! My uncle must be doofinshmirtz, taking over the tri-state area one unholy creation at a time
The question statement was a bit a ambiguous, because when you have stated that one engine many be responsible for more than one outcome, then it must be valid to assume that say if engine X,Y give E as effect then set of all effects by X,Y is not necessary equal to {E} [ Which is not true in general]. For example a better statement for observation results is ' when B and C are ON, *only* the fuel gauge glows. ',and so on.
@@flargarbason1740 With all due respect, that's bad advice. If you look at it straight forward in a rigorous way, you get exactly the described problem. You only avoid it by either not looking at it straight forward, but thinking a little bit about how the concrete constraints of the riddle look like, which is thinking more, not less, or by going with some gut feelings about the meaning. The last version might get someone to the right conclusion easily ""by not overthinking it"", but will completely mislead someone else into solving a question that was never asked, making his inherently consistent solutions entirely worthless for the actual riddle. "Don't overthink it" is a vague advice that is usually very wrong and only really applicable to specific cases. I do not believe this is one of them, and even if it was, you didn't have the information to know it based on what Bhaskar Pandey wrote. I know you're trying to help and I'm actually sorry if I sounded harsh, but as you probably expect, I've given similar cases of advice a lot of thought in the past, and answering to this sort of with the thought of a bigger problem in mind.
wooooo! honestly feeling good about being able to answer a few of the teded riddles 😭😭😭 my brain has been stagnant during the pandemic so im taking these as mini warmups for bigger things in life. thanks teded
It would have been such a cool detail if, when they pressed the buttons, the gravitometer started spinning when the thrusters came on. It would have been such a minor detail, but it would’ve been so cool.
@@theangelraziel Yeah I didn't fully understand that application to the final 2 test notes and originally saw it applied only to two different buttons until it was mentioned in the first part of the solution. Immediately paused the video and resolved. Could have been worded better, but it was somewhat explicitly stated so I can't be too miffed.
@@theangelraziel "No effect is caused by two factors in conjunction." This doesn't affect the ABCD answer. In fact, it supports it. According to what's written, pressing E makes the gravitometer spin.
@@clanpsi I know this is a late reply, but I don't control the whims of the RUclips algorithm. xD What rules out the ABCD answer is the rule that the same cause will always have the same effect. So if the Gravitometer is the cause of all the faults, it would trigger all of them all the time. Not Ignition and Oxygen one time, but the Reactor the second time.
3:38 "So we can conclude that a glowing fuel gauge makes the reactor leak." Or, more, likely, a glowing fuel gauge is caused by whatever hidden problem also causes the reactor to leak. I'd like to think that the gauge itself couldn't make the reactor leak.
Dear Ted ed ; Here we need to avoid two case; First case is of ignition exploding and oxygen depleting which is triggered by the helium tank rattle and gravitometer spinning the second case is of reactor leaking which triggered by the fuel gas glowing and gravitometer spinning Now; (as I see it as per my analogy) A=helium tank rattle B,C=fuel tank glow D,E=gravitometer Maximum no of thrusters we could turn in avoiding the aforementioned two case ( of failure) are A B & C (i.e.3) {as combination of these 3 thrusters is leading to any failure} Please help me out I am regular follower of your puzzles . Thanks a lot!!
No side gang: *"Has a choice to steal all of your uncle's invention by robbing his house in the night"* Also no side gang: *"Kidnaps your uncle then tells you to race with them with a 50 50 chance of failing to get all of your uncle's invention"* Me: Accurate
"When thrusters A, B, and D are on...." I read that to mean all 3 must be on at the same time for the effect to happen, not that each independently triggers the reaction. So I came up with the wrong answer due to grammar. :(
Let's appreciate the naming here, giving consistent and unique letters to everything! (buttons A to E, Fuel gauge, Gravitometer, Helium tank, Ignition, Oxygen and Reactor)
The thing i like about those ridles is that they have a story behind.It makes it more interesting than just saying the conditions and the riddle.Sorry,my English sucks, I'm moldovan
Rule #2 may be technically ambiguous. When it says "no effect is produced by multiple causes in conjunction" I rephrased it as "multiple causes in conjunction yield _zero_ effect" (i.e. their effects actively _cancel out,_ exclusive-or style) which makes the problem basically unsolvable :(
0:35 Me: don’t say it... it’s not important... just continue the video... grammar critics are annoying... Also me: (scrolls down to comments) “Further is metaphorical, farther is physical”
I'm confused. How was the gravitometer ruled out at 3:30? Can't the spinning gravitometer be a case of 1:18 - one factor triggering two different effects?
Psst! Don't forget that rule #2 applies to ALL causes and effects. And to clear up any ambiguity, the fuel gauge glowing, the gravitometer spinning, and the helium tank rattling count as both causes and effects.
I had a different problem with rule #2 - I mentally rephrased it as "multiple causes in conjunction produce no effect" which technically implies an exclusive-or relation when multiple causes have one effect (or vice versa), which makes the riddle unsolvable :(
1:30 How come the only light-skinned character is shown as a brilliant inventor while the only brown-skinned character is shown as a violent criminal?
I had all my letters with the right things I put D as nothing(?) and didn’t think that rule #2 applied to the car malfunctioning but when I found out in the video I quickly figure out which one was correct. I’m giving myself 70/100
Why wouldn't the answer be ABCD?
@@trevorvergesart The key is in rule 2: No Effect is produced by multiple causes in conjunction.
#6 reads "Shortly after the Fuel gauge Glows and the Gravitometer spins, the reactor leaks". **This does not mean that both the Fuel gauge and the Gravitometer need to be both going off simultaneously to cause the leak**, as such a requirement would break the rule. It is possible that they both cause reactor leaks (the same way thrusters B and C both cause the Fuel Gauge to glow), but they cannot require the other to do so.
Once rule 2 is understood than the implications of notes 5 and 6 are clear -
if the Gravitometer caused reactor leaks, then it would ALWAYS cause them, Fuel Guage be darned. That means that in note 5, the Gravitometer should be causing a reactor leak. Yet the Gravitometer is spinning and no reactor leak in sight. This means that the Gravitometer doesn't cause reactor leaks, so in note 6, the Fuel gauge is responsible. The same concept can be applied to note 5 itself to show that the Helium tank, not the Gravitometer, is responsible for the ignition explosion and the oxygen depletion, since if the Gravitometer was causing them, it would also cause them in note 6.
Thus, any thruster that sets off the heilum tank is a no go, since it will cause ignition explosion and oxygen depletion. Also, any thruster that sets off the Fuel Guage is ALSO a no go since it causes reactor leaks. Setting off the Gravitometer is a-ok, though, since we just proved it does nothing.
Solving that puzzle in the middle of a high speed race is magic
No wonder he was trailing behind the others
No pressure
676 likes ampota
@@AzraelVids ganun talaga
Batman enters the chat
"Let's see, so to secure my chances of winning, I just have to -"
*drives off cliff*
More like drive over a ravine, using thrusters D and E.
@@kevinlane1219 Missing the joke. By the time you've figured that out, you'll have driven off the cliff.
@@killdozer7792 Ah. I get it now. Thank you for clarifying. What would you have done to get the uncle back?
If yo can solve this riddle under 3 seconds you are truly the protagonist
@@kevinlane1219 Win the race to save your uncle and his inventions.
Me: **in a race**
Also me: **reads some notes and makes a table while driving**
he has a basic autopilot, probably.
Well, that's the point LOL
I wanted to comment that you thief
Me: **in a ikea**
Also me: **reads some notes and makes a table while walking**
Sri Krishna Satvik Pasalapudi He is not a thief both of you probably thought of the same thing but he typed it first
TedEd: You're in the middle of a death race
Also TedEd: Now lets make a chart
Yes
No, you are in his HYPOTHETICAL situation so you will have the chart for later when it actually happens
@@holtzwizard2094 Me: Calls the police about a kidnapping
me: *fall*
booga booga
*Minor Tinkering of Death:*
1. Ignition Explosion
2. Reactor Leakage
3. Oxygen Level Depletion
😂😂
a.b.c.d.e.f.g.h
woohoo ted-ed comedy
Either witch will blow up the car.
Who thought of Among Us when they said "Oxygen Levels Depleting" and "Reactor Leaking"?
0:29 eye smileys, self-cleaning vacuum cleaner, man this guy's a genius
My favourite is the self cleaning toilet. And that too it's waterless! Awesome! So environment friendly!!
I liked the rock-ing chair and the rocket rollers. Two great music puns
@@mohammedfaizan3013 Sad that you can't drink the toilet water anymore. Wait what did I say?
I wish the eye smileys existed
Ikr
this was worded in a way where i thought all i had to do was avoid the specific reactions, i was ready to press A-D and use all 4 of those thrusters
Enrique S yeah, I read it that way, too. I still think A, B, C, and D are okay to push. Very awkwardly worded.
Yes, my answer was A, B, C and D too. After watching the answer I still don't get it. What are they talking about there?
Skarpo I thought the same but essentially you have to figure out which thrusters are causing the defects.
same here
The fallacy with our answers, mine being the same as OP's, was that we assumed that the gravitometer was the key factor in causing the critical failure, when instead we should have ruled it out because it was the common factor that had no effect on it's own, i.e. we ignored the rule that stated if a cause showed no effect independently, it would cause no effect even when present simultaneously with any other cause.
Imagine how annoyed these people must be to put out these riddles trying to help us think better, but then when they go to comments, all they see is people complaining about how theyll never be able to solve these.
my thoughts are same🤣🤣🤣
Ehh, on some of the easier ones you see a bunch of people saying they solved it
We all complain about how they are to solve but imagine the amount of double checking, making just the right rules, and brainpower involved in making them. The creators are literal geniuses
Or determining that we have green eyes and asking the car to work
or they see people who don't have reading comprehension complaining about how the riddle is wrong and they got the right answer
Can we just take a moment to appreciate the person who came up with the uncle's inventions (especially the rocking chair)
Snow speedos
The self cleaning vacuum
I’m glad I figured this out in the five seconds I had before the jump
I’m guessing the shortcut basically skips the entire track and that you have time to stop and work all this out without losing.
Ah yes, I turned on only D for the first 2 seconds of the run, then at the last second, turned on E, and, although I hated the gravitometer spinning, got the win.
That is so cruel why why would a parent name their child slate kanoli.
In Kentucky it’s legal to name your kid anonymous
Sourav Jha what d'you mean?
@@acebalistic1358 woah seriously?????🤔🤔and how many parents actually do that?😂😂
@@aaryasharma9781 That's the name of the uncle 0:12
unicorns in the darkness it’s Kentucky so I assume at least 17
Also sorry for the late reply
Me: Drives, looks at time on my phone, literally crashes and dies.
Ted Ed character: drives, comes up with a total plan, makes a table, still wins and scratchless
WTF??!!!!
edit: I realized my mistake and now know what went wrong. Where I got lost was the fact that, i assumed the effects rules only applied to rockets via problems. But it turns out it also applies to the problems via hazards.
I feel like this specific riddle was a little bit unclear as it says that he was certain that the failures were causes of chain reactions from the thrusters 1:11
so the fact that when the gravitometer spins & the helium tank rattles, the ignition explodes and the oxygen levels deplete
so the 'chain reaction' of the helium tank rattling and the gravitometer spinning creates the catastrophe. Therefore as long as you didn't trigger both of them you'd be fine no?
this led me to conclude the opposite of the final answer as both had the gravitometer spinning so as long as i didn't use that no chain reaction would take place and id be safe. so i could activate 'a, b, c, & d'
I found the same answer using the same logic. For me, the notes implied that while activating 1 thruster may trigger 2 different reaction (random exemple : thruster D making the Helium Tank Rattle and the Fuel Gauge glow), the fatal errors where caused by the combination of the different problems (aka the reactor leaks ONLY if you trigger both the Fuel Gauge AND the Gravitometer)
So yeah, that one riddle was confusing, especially since there are 5 thrusters and it ask you to use as many as you can, so using 4 of them seemed way more intuitive than only 2
Same here
Neon Gem I had the same idea.
Same.
Same, and I believe we are correct in this if the premises is, as said, a chain reaction... instead of using only the spin as they did, I concluded that if "rattle + spin = boom + no-O2" and "glow + spin = leak", then I could not use either the thrusters that cause rattle or glow in conjunction with spin, yet nothing points to them not being used together, so spin would be the one to avoid, hence no E
You know when you’re sitting there like, “This actually seems pretty easy to solve if I made a chart...
But I’m too lazy to move, tell me the answer!”
Me
_literally._ _every._ _time._
“I did it, but at what cost?”
yup. i'm waiting to do it later for when i HaVe MoRe MoTiVaTiOn
yeah i do this on every riddle i can't immediately solve off the top of my head
How dare you read my exact train of thought from two minutes ago.
0:29 Really loved the extra mile you guys went to, not to mention the wacky creations themselves! Great riddle, TED-Ed!
i would actually buy the hatbrella
@@drwillfulneglect it exists and it's called sombrero
Mmm noodle pen. Just draw myself some noodles.
0:29 Can we just appreciate how cool his inventions are?!!!!
YES
Took me a while to figure out the answer: D and E. (I would've crashed way before solving it).
Good riddle IMO.
Rule #2 and rule #3 are important to understand since they state that "No effect is produced by multiple causes in conjuction" and "different causes may separately lead to the same effect"
This means that for clue #1 the fuel gauge glow CANNOT be due to BOTH B and C being turned on. Either (Option 1)B makes the glow and C does not, (Option 2)C makes the glow and B does not, or (Option 3) they both make the glow independently. The video clearly shows the last option.
Similarly in clue #5 the ignition exploding and oxygen levels depleting CANNOT be due to BOTH the rattle and spin. Either (OP. 1) the rattle causes the explosion and the spin causes depletion, (OP. 2) the rattle causes depletion and the spin causes explosion, (OP. 3) the rattle causes both the explosion + depletion, (OP.4) the spin causes both the explosion + depletion, or (OP.5) they both cause the explosion + depletion independently. It's neither the first two nor the last two options. In clue #6 the gravitometer spins but there is neither an explosion nor an oxygen depletion. So the rattle must be the cause of explosion + depletion.
This is fine because rule #4 states "a single cause can lead to multiple effects."
nice analysis of it, it melted my brain when I tried to solve it
I’m moving at 200 miles an hour and I have to solve this in less than 5 seconds before crash falling in a ravine of toxic waste
*lets read the instructions*
And stop paying attention to the road for a while and start working on that fun table of death..
@@sunrevolver and also marking it with different colour pen
You see, this is a riddle I like. It doesn't require you to have an understanding of complex math and it actually utilizes its story for the riddle instead of the story being just a backdrop.
It's just easy. That's why you like it.
But it is wrong, it has a logic error
@@Artaxerxes.your assumption has absolutely no concrete grounds or evidence. It’s also degrading. Geez give this person a break. It’s the kind of riddle I appreciate too, because I can appreciate a high stakes underdog race story
Fun Fact : Left handed people have a significantly higher chance of completing their exam on time then people with no hands
You had us in the first half, I'm not gonna lie
😂😂😁
Than
🤔
Binomial Expansion Bravo. That was great (>ヮ
0:29
That self cleaning vacuum cleaner, I need it.
For what???
A small mistake at 2:36, at the first “rule“ of the riddle you forgot the “y” in you
Dammit; I can't unsee that
Your the guy who asks people to correct "dont" to "don't" and "cant" to "can't" 😒
@@swarnavasengupta69 oxford ke launde h
@@swarnavasengupta69 and your to you're
Sourav Jha I think he did that on purpose
I figured out the answer to the riddle in the title: No.
I know answer to title of all ted ed riddles
Commentur The Great I’ve only never been able to do the math riddles. Other than that I actually solve them. That’s kind of the point of a riddle
Ulu
Lol, don't want to give up those "Snow Speedos" 0:29
Then solve the riddle..... it's been 8 months 😂😂😂
s e l f c l e a n i n g t o i l e t
x - r a y t s h i r t
Step 1: Confirm that the uncle has green eyes
Step 2: Have him ask the No-Side gang if he can leave.
Is the green eye thing a Ted Ed meme?
And the zombies came and ate the side gang, cause they didn’t lick the frog, and they didn’t go back to the entrance twice
Copied comment.
KerbalTube HD yes
@@kerbaltubehd5737 yes kind of there is a very famous riddle by ted ex which was about finding green eyed people and something weird like that.
I had an assignment like that in 11th grade math, my answer was the thought process of not pushing the buttons that are involving the part of ABD, ADE, and CDE, my teacher loved it 😊
???
I got a different answer, I thought the spinning gravitometer in combination with the helium tank/fuel gage caused a different outcome. So as long as the gravitometer does not spin, nothing will go wrong. I deduced that E caused the meter to spin, so A, B, C, D can all be activated.
But no effect is caused by combination of the two reasons. They said it in the video!
Иван Логинов
Yeah, rule number whatever
I made the same mistake. I thought the combination rule only applied to thrusters and not to the effects themselves, hence I was using the same logic as you.
Notice how they worded it in the visual demonstration, “factor” not “thruster”, and the rules also say “cause” not “thruster”. You guys made assumptions, not a good things to do to solve riddles.
spent too long solving the riddle, already fell in the ravine
Yep
No one:
Ted Ed: Can you solve this riddle?
Me: No
Also me: yeah I’ll just watch it anyways without understanding what’s going on
Ramsagar31 Am I the only one who actually solves the riddles?
@@flargarbason1740 yes
@@flargarbason1740 no.
my small brain can't handle this
Same
0:29 "Portable cloud"
*GOKU WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*
_Its Nimbus_
_Nimbus_
0:49 "...your uncle was a notorious tinkerer, and the system still had some kinks to work out"
Considering the name "Slate (K)anoli", I can see that he put those kinks in for relatability, if you know what i mean. ;)
Uhuh
"your uncle was a notorious tinkerer and the system still have some kinks to work out"
sytem:i like feet
*Title:* Can you solve the death race riddle? *Me:* It’s called immortality
Tell that to Frankenstein.
Tom Riddle wants to know your location.
I managed to solve this one correctly, but to do so I had to make one critical assumption that wasn't explicitly stated: that the test notes were exhaustive and included any and all symptoms that occurred (e.g. if the fuel gauge isn't mentioned, it definitely didn't glow during that test run).
In other words, I had to assume that absence of evidence = evidence of absence, which typically isn't reliably true.
But there is a logic problem, B and C make the thing glow, when on together, but it says, more than one cause, doesn’t give the result. So B and C cannot both be the cause for the glowing
@@Tacholoco You've misread the rules. They say that more than one cause can independently give the same result (x *or* y causes z). What can't happen is for an effect to be triggered by two causes when neither cause alone does it (x *and* y causes z).
Title: “Can you solve the death race riddle?”
Me: “No never but I want to know how”
Whoa there buddy, have a growth mindset.
@Rose the Herald Well, I may not understand what you mean, but.. he isn’t givIng it a go..
If that’s not what you mean then ignore this
...lose and you'll forfeit your uncle and ALL of his other creations!
Me: he made the x ray tshirt! A rocking chair that ACTUALLY rocks?! I cant let this happen!😤
*looks at snow speedo*
Me: scratch that, yall can keep him💀 isnt bad enough we have to deal with that in the SUMMER?! My uncle must be doofinshmirtz, taking over the tri-state area one unholy creation at a time
The question statement was a bit a ambiguous, because when you have stated that one engine many be responsible for more than one outcome, then it must be valid to assume that say if engine X,Y give E as effect then set of all effects by X,Y is not necessary equal to {E} [ Which is not true in general]. For example a better statement for observation results is
' when B and C are ON, *only* the fuel gauge glows. ',and so on.
yes, it took me some time to realize they must have wanted the viewer to assume this meaning and finally have a solvable problem.
@@flargarbason1740 With all due respect, that's bad advice. If you look at it straight forward in a rigorous way, you get exactly the described problem. You only avoid it by either not looking at it straight forward, but thinking a little bit about how the concrete constraints of the riddle look like, which is thinking more, not less, or by going with some gut feelings about the meaning. The last version might get someone to the right conclusion easily ""by not overthinking it"", but will completely mislead someone else into solving a question that was never asked, making his inherently consistent solutions entirely worthless for the actual riddle.
"Don't overthink it" is a vague advice that is usually very wrong and only really applicable to specific cases. I do not believe this is one of them, and even if it was, you didn't have the information to know it based on what Bhaskar Pandey wrote. I know you're trying to help and I'm actually sorry if I sounded harsh, but as you probably expect, I've given similar cases of advice a lot of thought in the past, and answering to this sort of with the thought of a bigger problem in mind.
@@BlissToby Can't agree more !
Another solution:
Confirm your uncle has green eyes.
He asks to leave.
Souped up cars with turbo thrusters are lame
We want eye smileys
Everytime I think I'm useless, I remember the self-cleaning vaccum cleaner.
Gang: completes 20% of the race in one second
Me: so let's take a detailed look at these notes
I admire the ability of the driver for his capability of making a table and reading notrs while racing..
Kudos
wooooo! honestly feeling good about being able to answer a few of the teded riddles 😭😭😭 my brain has been stagnant during the pandemic so im taking these as mini warmups for bigger things in life. thanks teded
Casually driving on a dangerous path while looking at notes to find out which thrusters to turn on
0:30 Heh, so many silly inventions. Though I think the hatbrella is actually a thing, I could swear I saw someone wearing one in a movie once.
best informative and fun youtube channel i ever saw in my life!! GREAT WORK TED-ED!!!!
You Can Make This Combination:
A B C D
How? Beacause E Is The Culprit Of The Gravitometer Spinning
The gravitometer spinning is the only good one actually.
The gravitometer spinning is safe.
Look, a new riddle, I have been waiting!!!
Thieves: plans a race
Also thieves: doesn’t see the short cut
Maybe they saw it but they didn't have rocket engines on their vehicles so they couldn't use it.
medexamtoolsdotcom they want to win, of course they would have the energy to do that
Simple.
1. Activate all of the thrusters.
2. Use the blast to get to the finish.
I want more riddles please! They are so fun!
It would have been such a cool detail if, when they pressed the buttons, the gravitometer started spinning when the thrusters came on. It would have been such a minor detail, but it would’ve been so cool.
Ted-Ed: Can you solve the riddle?
Me: No
Also me: *clicks*
These riddles are so cool! Please make more of these!😊
Me: "Of course i can't solve the riddle, but i'll still watch it"
Ted-Ed: 0:02
I had it perfectly backwards, I forgot that the rule of two things causing one outcome also applied to the catastrophic failures
Slightly confusing as I thought all of the things had to be activated to cause the disturbance. (In that case, I think the answer is ABCD)
I thought so too, but later realized this is covered by 2. No effect is produced by multiple causes in conjunction.
@@theangelraziel Yeah I didn't fully understand that application to the final 2 test notes and originally saw it applied only to two different buttons until it was mentioned in the first part of the solution. Immediately paused the video and resolved. Could have been worded better, but it was somewhat explicitly stated so I can't be too miffed.
@@theangelraziel "No effect is caused by two factors in conjunction." This doesn't affect the ABCD answer. In fact, it supports it. According to what's written, pressing E makes the gravitometer spin.
@@clanpsi I know this is a late reply, but I don't control the whims of the RUclips algorithm. xD
What rules out the ABCD answer is the rule that the same cause will always have the same effect. So if the Gravitometer is the cause of all the faults, it would trigger all of them all the time. Not Ignition and Oxygen one time, but the Reactor the second time.
@@clanpsi The gravitometer can’t cause one effect one time and another effect another time
You: *Driving a very fast and possibly explosive car in a literal life-or-death race to save your uncle*
"So, let's make a table..."
ummm in the brilliant ad:
Pyrrha, yang, ruby, weiss and blake?
Sounds like RWBY to me
That's definitely RWBY.
Uncle Slate's inventions are like life hacks, solutions for problems that don't exist
They also have a high probability of killing the user.
I feel the answer should be A, B, C and D turned on. I don't agree that gravitometer is not a factor of malfunction.
Keep in mind that the gravitometer also counts as a cause so rule 5 applies.
Yeah I didn't realise that effects of the buttons had to follow the same rules as the thruster buttons as well
3:38 "So we can conclude that a glowing fuel gauge makes the reactor leak."
Or, more, likely, a glowing fuel gauge is caused by whatever hidden problem also causes the reactor to leak. I'd like to think that the gauge itself couldn't make the reactor leak.
And the other racers did not question how the guy who was way behind managed to finish the race before them🤷♂️
Who cares if they question it
The ravine jump is a legal move (it’s a death race, pretty sure there are no rules) it’s just near impossible and suicidal so no one ever tries it
at 0:30 you really got to appreciate some of this madman's creations
i know i won't be able to solve this so i'll just enjoy the animation
Dear Ted ed ;
Here we need to avoid two case;
First case is of ignition exploding and oxygen depleting which is triggered by the helium tank rattle and gravitometer spinning
the second case is of reactor leaking which triggered by the fuel gas glowing and gravitometer spinning
Now; (as I see it as per my analogy)
A=helium tank rattle
B,C=fuel tank glow
D,E=gravitometer
Maximum no of thrusters we could turn in avoiding the aforementioned two case ( of failure) are A B & C (i.e.3) {as combination of these 3 thrusters is leading to any failure}
Please help me out I am regular follower of your puzzles .
Thanks a lot!!
No side gang: *"Has a choice to steal all of your uncle's invention by robbing his house in the night"*
Also no side gang: *"Kidnaps your uncle then tells you to race with them with a 50 50 chance of failing to get all of your uncle's invention"*
Me: Accurate
Yeah not the point
My uncle could invent a portable cloud but not a super duper fast moving vehicle. Wow.
1: confirm you have green eyes
2: ask the kidnappers to leave
1: confirm that this is overused joke
1. Check your uncle has green eyes
2. He asks to be let go
3. If he has green eyes, he is free.
With the amount of time it took me to solve this the other team would’ve been to the finish line already anyway
Brilliant: *exists*
TED-Ed: *It’s free real estate!*
"When thrusters A, B, and D are on...." I read that to mean all 3 must be on at the same time for the effect to happen, not that each independently triggers the reaction. So I came up with the wrong answer due to grammar. :(
You also must have missed that they said no effect is caused by multiple factors in conjunction
“Okay so these are the correct trusters…”
“It seems that I have fell of the chill and is now in heaven.”
Moral of the story: Don’t drive distracted.
Wow! His uncle is a really good inventor...
Where can I buy self cleaning vacuum cleaner?
So I don't need to clean my vacuum cleaner again.....
Let's appreciate the naming here, giving consistent and unique letters to everything! (buttons A to E, Fuel gauge, Gravitometer, Helium tank, Ignition, Oxygen and Reactor)
5:07 lowkey thought this was about to be a raid shadow legends ad
Making a chart while driving a turbo car in a death race. That is what i love about TED-ED, solving logic puzzles in the most ilogical scenarios.
I can never solve ted ed riddles yet I'm still here.
I need a life.
If you watch simply or entertainment for to learn something, then I think that's okay.
Fernan Eunice I feel like the minority because I actually solve them
@@flargarbason1740 You are a member of the *Smart* minority.
Flarbargason same
The thing i like about those ridles is that they have a story behind.It makes it more interesting than just saying the conditions and the riddle.Sorry,my English sucks, I'm moldovan
2:36 there's a typo on "you"
1. ask your uncle to confirm he has green eyes
2. boom. he can leave.
0:54
Wow
*KINKS*
You: *Miraculously finishing the death race and saving your kidnapped uncle*
Him: Congratulates you by *SERVING TEA.*
You: "Am I a joke to you?"
Rule #2 may be technically ambiguous. When it says "no effect is produced by multiple causes in conjunction" I rephrased it as "multiple causes in conjunction yield _zero_ effect" (i.e. their effects actively _cancel out,_ exclusive-or style) which makes the problem basically unsolvable :(
This was the first Ted-Ed riddle I ever solved. So happy!
Damn I must be a great driver if I can read while still driving.
0:35
Me: don’t say it... it’s not important... just continue the video... grammar critics are annoying...
Also me: (scrolls down to comments) “Further is metaphorical, farther is physical”
The sponsor at the end has a RWBY reference
Nice riddle...
Please keep uploading more...
Luv your videos...
Love how they give a countdown to solve the riddle like I’m ever going to use it
POV: you have all the time in the world to think about this while in a race at the edge of the cliff your about to jump
"Rocking Chair", "Slow Speedo"... You know what, maybe we should let the gang have the uncle.
What are you talking about? Rocking chair sound like the best thing since sliced bread! 🤘
I'm confused. How was the gravitometer ruled out at 3:30? Can't the spinning gravitometer be a case of 1:18 - one factor triggering two different effects?
"Can you..."
*"NO"*
Can you breathe?
I read the riddle wrong, and came to the conclusion that you could press A,B,C and D simultaneously. I would be mad dead.
The first riddle posted by Ted ed was the only one I tried to solve
Now I just watch the animation..
Interesting that the thieves kidnapped the uncle but didn't take the race car then and there lol