Assalam o Alaikum Sir I am an aspirant of CSS and preparing for css2022. I have opted political science as my optional subjects but I didnt have grip on it. However, your lectures on philosophers really help me in my preparation. Highly appreciate your work!!! Masha Allah you are a lauded professor I will meet and greet you when I come there for my training Insha Allah.. Best wishes and Regard Engr Hina Kanwal Khan
Sir I am from India working as Sr lecturer teaching Physics for last 12 years . Recently developed interst in philosophies of East and West and start studying them passionately l like the way u teach with such a ease without any prejudices. Keep it up sir
Professor Rahman gives another great lecture. I love the way you make philosophy come alive. The middle section where you elicit the students' goals was wonderful. And in the middle of a lecture on Hobbes, of all people. (Yes, I see the connection.) I'm glad some of the students asked pertinent questions about the state of nature. I think you are letting Hobbes and modern philosophy off the hook, though. One student was talking about hunter gatherers. You correctly pointed out that hierarchical societies originated with agiculture. I'd like to point out that Anthropologists also agree that nomadic hunter gatherers are the most egalitarian societies in the world. They have been around for two million years, since the invention of the first stone tools allowed humankind to hunt and skin bigger game. Humankind has been living in egalitarian societies for a lot longer than they have been living in hierarchical societies. Philosophy has not absorbed Darwin's theory nor the late twentieth century evidence from field primatology. Instead philosophy has made the idea of "the state of nature" into more and more of an abstraction, eg. John Rawls, "original condition". There is no excuse for not incorporating anthropology and biology into philosophy. Hunter gatherers are not in the state of nature, because although they don't really have political systems, they have moral systems. And their moral systems don't work hierarchically but by the participation of all adults in adherence and enforcement. In these societies there is no one in charge but they still have morality. The state of nature is great ape dominance hierarchy, a bit like Hobbe's absolute monarch, but without the consent of the subjects. The social contract creates a self-organized moral system without anyone being in charge, and it is enforced by everyone's participation. This works well on the scale of nomadic hunter gatherer societies where the group size varies from 20 to 250 individuals. After agriculture was invented larger societies required political systems. But moral systems are primary. See my "The Meaning of Hobbes' Sword" for more.
Political science ka student hu ..... ap imagine kar sakti hei kitna support or help mujhe es videos es mila houga .. Jab be koi video dekta hu , ap ku dil se dua deita hu .
Sir please please please aik "Collar mic" use karliya kary lecture detay howey awaaazz bht clear hojyegi jub upload kary gay toh....zyada mehnga nai milta taqreebun sahi zubardast walaa 14 soo ya 27 soo tak ka ajata hay.......your lectures are precious and full of knowledge and ....plz use mic like jordan peterson do..... and i am sure ur university will allow this...
Well. Sir if you would have asked me the question, what you want to be good at? I would say, I want to be good at making money 💰, 😂 to become a bourgeois. Anyhow, really great effort of teaching Modern Political Philosophy. Love you
This lecture would work very well in relation to the topic of cybernetics. The legal system only gives us a legal person which isn’t a corporeal body, I am guessing so that the persona is used with a corporate synthetic body. Government is a publicly funded business
love your all lectures and sir my one request is that please add any link for lecture slides because many students including me are not good in english we can get more knowledge from slides please sir again request
![Plato [Eng]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bpTDFN90oVI/mqdefault.jpg)
Assalam o Alaikum Sir
I am an aspirant of CSS and preparing for css2022. I have opted political science as my optional subjects but I didnt have grip on it. However, your lectures on philosophers really help me in my preparation.
Highly appreciate your work!!!
Masha Allah you are a lauded professor
I will meet and greet you when I come there for my training Insha Allah..
Best wishes and Regard
Engr Hina Kanwal Khan
Me also
Sir I am from India working as Sr lecturer teaching Physics for last 12 years . Recently developed interst in philosophies of East and West and start studying them passionately l like the way u teach with such a ease without any prejudices. Keep it up sir
Professor Rahman gives another great lecture. I love the way you make philosophy come alive. The middle section where you elicit the students' goals was wonderful. And in the middle of a lecture on Hobbes, of all people. (Yes, I see the connection.) I'm glad some of the students asked pertinent questions about the state of nature. I think you are letting Hobbes and modern philosophy off the hook, though. One student was talking about hunter gatherers. You correctly pointed out that hierarchical societies originated with agiculture. I'd like to point out that Anthropologists also agree that nomadic hunter gatherers are the most egalitarian societies in the world. They have been around for two million years, since the invention of the first stone tools allowed humankind to hunt and skin bigger game. Humankind has been living in egalitarian societies for a lot longer than they have been living in hierarchical societies. Philosophy has not absorbed Darwin's theory nor the late twentieth century evidence from field primatology. Instead philosophy has made the idea of "the state of nature" into more and more of an abstraction, eg. John Rawls, "original condition". There is no excuse for not incorporating anthropology and biology into philosophy. Hunter gatherers are not in the state of nature, because although they don't really have political systems, they have moral systems. And their moral systems don't work hierarchically but by the participation of all adults in adherence and enforcement. In these societies there is no one in charge but they still have morality. The state of nature is great ape dominance hierarchy, a bit like Hobbe's absolute monarch, but without the consent of the subjects. The social contract creates a self-organized moral system without anyone being in charge, and it is enforced by everyone's participation. This works well on the scale of nomadic hunter gatherer societies where the group size varies from 20 to 250 individuals. After agriculture was invented larger societies required political systems. But moral systems are primary. See my "The Meaning of Hobbes' Sword" for more.
Love your lectures - Engineering student but love your lectures!
Excellent sir plz keep posting these lectures dont ever stop... Im learning great stuff at home with any cost....
Sir I have learnt much knowledge from you.And aslo want to seat at the front of you to enjoy your funny and informative lectures.
Thank you so much sir for your kind support it helps us a lot.
I wish criticism part bhi hota alag se ... par jitnaaaa best apny samjhaya sir no words , thanks
Sir your lecture is very helpful from India
you r the best tutor of pak sir love from india
Great ideas sir.Thanks alot.
Kindly share the slides as you did in the lectures of Plato and Aristotle.❤️
I love u sir
You are great Mentor
Political science ka student hu ..... ap imagine kar sakti hei kitna support or help mujhe es videos es mila houga ..
Jab be koi video dekta hu , ap ku dil se dua deita hu .
Sir please please please aik "Collar mic" use karliya kary lecture detay howey awaaazz bht clear hojyegi jub upload kary gay toh....zyada mehnga nai milta taqreebun sahi zubardast walaa 14 soo ya 27 soo tak ka ajata hay.......your lectures are precious and full of knowledge and ....plz use mic like jordan peterson do.....
and i am sure ur university will allow this...
Trade your liberty for your security 😉 awesome concluding marks sir love from Balochistan.
Mashallah sir... Allah give you so much ability..
Well. Sir if you would have asked me the question, what you want to be good at? I would say, I want to be good at making money 💰, 😂 to become a bourgeois. Anyhow, really great effort of teaching Modern Political Philosophy. Love you
This is so good
Please also share the soft copy of lecture. Thanks
This lecture would work very well in relation to the topic of cybernetics. The legal system only gives us a legal person which isn’t a corporeal body, I am guessing so that the persona is used with a corporate synthetic body. Government is a publicly funded business
love your all lectures and sir my one request is that please add any link for lecture slides because many students including me are not good in english we can get more knowledge from slides please sir again request
How can we get written notes of these lectures?
Kindly share the slides...
Sir slides are not visible. If you can please share them.
Sir , can you plz share your these slides, actually, I am preparing for competitive exams.
End Mein mjy gusa aa rha . Slides he visible nahi
Dear comrade, well done
Can you provide us with this presentation in soft form?
Sir I need your slides.
Excuse me sir. Do you have any online course on political science.?
24:57 🤣🤣 ‘not much under your skin’ hahah good one
What is Realism?
تھامس ہابز نے Leviathan نامی کتاب لکھی ۔۔۔۔تھامس ہابز کے نزدیک فطرت ہر وقت اک حالت جنگ وجدل ہے۔۔۔۔۔۔۔کیا یہ معلومات درست ہیں
Yes.
@@Taimur_Laal
شکریہ نوازش آپ کی ۔۔۔
Mixed with Urdo. that is the problem. one can not follow the argument entirely
I'm working on getting it subtitled.
Sir why don't you describe in relation Islam ideology with Western.
I want to be good at mathematics and music. 😊
Both require just practice.
Indeed a lot sir... 🙏
👍
Hobbes doesn't deserve an hour
i can't understand your English