Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

Why Ukraine won’t be joining NATO anytime soon | The Bottom Line

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024

Комментарии • 555

  • @topweddingsa4059
    @topweddingsa4059 Год назад +53

    John Mearsheimer the legend💯

    • @iddrisibrahim9924
      @iddrisibrahim9924 Год назад

      They r using Ukraine true Nazis zelenskey

    • @ipincsmuhammad9162
      @ipincsmuhammad9162 Год назад

      No he is lier

    • @deadpoolguy283
      @deadpoolguy283 Год назад +3

      @@ipincsmuhammad9162 Whats a "lier"?

    • @ipincsmuhammad9162
      @ipincsmuhammad9162 Год назад

      @@deadpoolguy283 just see Russia and China news and your find the answers correctly. I'm asia and I know it's all lie from west propaganda to make expanding if you follow news ww2 not west invade jerman but Russia so france and jerman belonging to Russia even today's. Even they say iraq have dangerous weapon but the truths story it's never exist and many more

    • @Mman.
      @Mman. Год назад +4

      @@ipincsmuhammad9162if you want to insult a world renowned academic, at least spell the words correctly.

  • @masssly
    @masssly Год назад +79

    Gosh, a full 24 mins with John Mearsheimer is simply awesome ❤️

    • @robertmiller2173
      @robertmiller2173 Год назад +4

      He would throw every small democracy under Putin's Jack Boot!

    • @arrivingone
      @arrivingone Год назад

      He is heaping praise on Putin and Russia winning the war with Ukraine! he might as well be a puppet spokeperson for the Kremlin regime!

  • @sanforizedbutthead
    @sanforizedbutthead 11 месяцев назад +2

    Thank you Al Jazeera for giving Professor Mearsheimer a platform. His coherent and refined thinking is very much needed and many should become familiar with it.

  • @Sandy-qs5og
    @Sandy-qs5og Год назад +17

    The only western analysit that I saw who analysis it right 👏.

    • @TheReferrer72
      @TheReferrer72 Год назад +1

      No he's not.
      He said the same about the Kherson offensive and it did not turn out well for Russia.

    • @Big-guy1981
      @Big-guy1981 Год назад +2

      ​​@@TheReferrer72ohn Mearsheimer is an expert in International Relations not military strategy (he made it only to captain during his time in the military).
      I don't think a major channel like Al-Jazeera would bother inviting him if his opinion wasn't somewhat relevant.

    • @bbbbbbears6999
      @bbbbbbears6999 Год назад

      There are many others, Jeffrey Sachs is another one, but you will never hear about them because they don't fit the main stream narrative.

    • @robertdavidson8028
      @robertdavidson8028 Год назад

      @@Big-guy1981 I quite like Prof. Mearsheimer, but would like to think Prof. Jeffrey Sachs is better on the Geopolitical side of things; I have the impression that JM is always a few steps behind, playing catch-up, probably because he's a bit more conservative in his opinions.
      As far as the military side is concerned I listen to Douglas McGregor and Scott Ritter; from what I've seen I'm hazarding I really wouldn't concur with DMcG about some, or maybe most, of his internal American beliefs and politics, and I'm not sure, but that might be true also of Scott Ritter; but I think their sources on the military conduct of the war etc. give them a strong edge.
      If some of you want to "blow your minds" to use a very outdated expression I suggest you try a post with the title
      Who killed Prigozhin? Power panel w/Ritter,Johnson, Mcgovern Intel Roundtable if it's still available; they don't just stick to topic as I recall, although they cover it pretty thoroughly.

  • @reginadavid2459
    @reginadavid2459 Год назад +4

    NATO is actually was formed against the USSR. So in my opinion they had to reform or rename themselves. Why should Russia trust NATO? Of course they didn't want them to be near their border. Who would want this? Would the USA want Russian military bases to be near their country? More than that that cluster bombs were in use already by Ukrain, during past 8 years. And people still get bombed on those mines.

  • @Kreiger778
    @Kreiger778 Год назад +13

    Cluster bombs are not artillery but anti-personel ammo. They won't stop a tank, destroy a position, or artillery pieces.

    • @ericp1139
      @ericp1139 Год назад +8

      Exactly. And the US even admitted that they are only sending clusters because they’ve run out of ammo.

    • @hilkovanwalraven3111
      @hilkovanwalraven3111 Год назад

      no cluster ammunition are smal bombs in a shell for arty ,planes and rockets

  • @ericp1139
    @ericp1139 Год назад +27

    Finally, a guest that knows what’s really going on.

  • @kobeyheberling6172
    @kobeyheberling6172 Год назад +50

    I first learned about John in my college class. He has provided the most honest analysis I’ve seen on Ukraine in all of media

    • @arrivingone
      @arrivingone Год назад

      The war isn't over you idiot and this guy only has nothing but good things to say about Putin and Russia winning the war with Ukraine! he might as well be a puppet spokeperson for the Kremlin regime!

    • @r.williamcomm7693
      @r.williamcomm7693 Год назад +2

      Agree. Unfortunately the US is on the wrong side of history here.

  • @Hyperion1722
    @Hyperion1722 Год назад +3

    Cornering a scared dog will fight back and bite hard. Just saying.

  • @diazvirdani1059
    @diazvirdani1059 Год назад +4

    *Russia🇷🇺 still occupied oblast Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, Kherson, Crimea.*
    Russia must end occupation & keep peace.!

    • @pibroch
      @pibroch Год назад

      In exchange for what?

  • @jenmurphy6343
    @jenmurphy6343 Год назад +2

    NATO should have broken up when the USSR dissolved

  • @Mman.
    @Mman. Год назад +33

    John Mearsheimer, always a pleasure to hear his clear, honest, and logical perspective

    • @ericp1139
      @ericp1139 Год назад +1

      I’m disappointed in John when he speaks on China, because it’s like all his analytical prowess that he displays for Russia goes out the window.

    • @Mman.
      @Mman. Год назад +2

      @@ericp1139how so? If you don’t mind saying.

    • @ericp1139
      @ericp1139 Год назад

      @@Mman. his stance is that China is the real enemy that NATO should be focusing their war efforts on containing. But if his whole stance is that you shouldn’t scare a nuclear superpower, then how does that principle not apply to China too?

    • @Mman.
      @Mman. Год назад

      @@ericp1139 i understand you now. I believe that Mearsheimer is consistent regarding not backing a great power into a corner lest they respond desperately, whether it be Russia or China. If I understand him correctly, he thinks that the focus on containing Russia is misguided because Russia is no longer a peer competitor and was not threatening vital US security interests. China, however, is a peer competitor and so should be contained to prevent China dominating East Asia. He still would advise against going too far.

    • @TangledUpInBlue631
      @TangledUpInBlue631 Год назад

      ​@@Mman. Then there is the wildcard, taiwan. A conflict will change the matrix.

  • @babymonalisa
    @babymonalisa Год назад +4

    Zelensky has been shockingly naiive.

  • @paulfildes5489
    @paulfildes5489 Год назад +21

    The background and implications of the 2014 far-right coup in Kiev, which overthrew the pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych, is critical for understanding the current Ukraine-Russia war. This coup was openly supported by US and EU and implemented primarily by far-right shock troops such as the Right Sector and the Svoboda Party. It represented the temporary culmination of long-standing efforts by the US to install a puppet regime on the borders of Russia. The regime change prompted the outbreak of an ongoing civil war in the east of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea. In the US, the coup was a catalyst for an ever more aggressive campaign against Russia and the US and NATO funded the Ukrainian state and far-right forces with billions of dollars. On 19 September 2018, Ukrainian President Poroshenko signed a decree NOT to extend the The Treaty Of Friendship which guaranteed Ukkraine's borders with Russia and was signed in Kyiv on 31 May 1997 by the then President of Ukraine Leonid Kuchma and Russian President Yeltsin. On 3 December 2018, Poroshenko drafted a legislation to Parliament to end the Treaty of Friendship immediately with support coming from Western allies. Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that it was notified on 24 September 2018 of the treaty's termination by Ukraine and expressed regret. On December 6 the Ukrainian parliament declared the Treaty to be terminated starting from April 1, 2019.

    • @alimakization
      @alimakization Год назад +5

      If that's the case, they're receiving what they wished for

    • @michaelmechanics4062
      @michaelmechanics4062 Год назад +1

      The US and Nato did more than just support the Maidan revolution that overthrew Yanukovich. They engineered the coup.

    • @colincampbell4261
      @colincampbell4261 Год назад

      Still pushing ruzzian lies and propaganda.

    • @LLlap
      @LLlap Год назад +1

      Also aliens and Batman.

  • @SpruceWood-NEG
    @SpruceWood-NEG Год назад +49

    Ukraine is a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and China also views Russia as a buffer zone with NATO. If NATO engages in direct combat with Russia, China will have to be implicated in the conflict. This is unavoidable and has nothing to do with the so-called social system.

    • @marnelleetienne7843
      @marnelleetienne7843 Год назад

      000 p pp00000

    • @rudomeister
      @rudomeister Год назад

      Whats happening on the news, is a tube where the words are directed towards the public, or somewhere else. I think it's all planned to the fingertips. Every military package with escalating inventories, NATO membership, speeches and actions. Everything we see is a informational war, sometimes directed to the public, or to the enemy. Zelensky should know Ukraine doesn't get to be a member during wartime, and when they eventually win the war no one knows, or at least pretend to not know. If Ukraine wins, hopefully during a regime shift in Russia, then the worldimage start to look quiet different than it does now, specially if the younger generation in Russia start waking up from this USSR doctrine of administrative apathy. I think they will eventually, they just got unfortunate getting a USSR expert like Putin as a president introduced into the seat by the drunk Jeltzin.

  • @jenmurphy6343
    @jenmurphy6343 Год назад +2

    How much had Z pocketed since it started??

  • @TamG443
    @TamG443 Год назад +21

    My understanding was that the Donbass area, after voting for independence from the Ukraine and having it denied, was bombed by the Ukraine for eight long years, with 15.000 deaths, after which the Donbass reached out to Russia and requested their assistance and protection from the Ukraine . Consequently , Russia did not invade nor did it annex this territory.. The people voted for this.

    • @alimakization
      @alimakization Год назад +8

      Ssshh... no one wants to talk about that

    • @TamG443
      @TamG443 Год назад +2

      @@alimakization Sure why talk about it like intelligent adults when we can go to war and make billions off the destruction of a whole country simply because it has an idiot for a president.

    • @jeremynelson8040
      @jeremynelson8040 Год назад +5

      When Ukraine declared its independence in its “revolution”, so did the Russian speaking citizenry in the Donbas but they declared their independence from the Ukrainian forces that formed the new government…at that point, when NATO recognized Ukraine’s government, Russia recognized the government in the Donbas (please note, that Ukraine’s population, to the east in the Donbas are all Russian speaking, it is truly a country divided 50/50 by language). Russia recognized the country that spoke its language that was being killed by western nato troops/bombs in attempt to keep Ukraine non-nato which the west promised it would do. Russia is aggressively keeping Ukraine from becoming a NATO or EU member and NATO is the paramilitary force of the US uses to bait countries into an Article 5 guarantee which states NATO will come to save the day if a member. NATO is a military alliance from WW2…it is an existential threat to Russia to have a western “democracy” ie puppet state which spreads US crony capitalism.

    • @jeremynelson8040
      @jeremynelson8040 Год назад

      I think we agree that the western narrative of a Russian invasion is misleading propaganda. It smells fishy that a warn town country could hold a "national" vote on its foreign policy to me, not any judgement, just I haven't heard of any nation-state allowing for domestic populations to vote on on its foreign policy, but I am still a nit to this conflict imo.

    • @meshzzizk
      @meshzzizk Год назад +2

      there’s a lot of confusion about the history here. for one thing, russia began assisting the donbas separatists militarily in 2014 but did not recognize their political independence from ukraine until just before the feb 2022 invasion. you all seem to think it was the other way around.

  • @melesegirmaye9682
    @melesegirmaye9682 Год назад +18

    Real Education and its knowledge make difference. Look at this man!!!!

  • @parbatrt
    @parbatrt Год назад +22

    Perfectly explained the cons and pros of the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine 🎉

    • @eman3682
      @eman3682 Год назад +1

      He's wrong! Ruissa artillery was 10:1, but they've used 10 million shells & can only produce an estimated 20,000 shells per month. Russian artillery is not Amazon Prime.

    • @mourka01
      @mourka01 Год назад +3

      ​@@eman3682do you have any sources to back that claim up?

    • @eman3682
      @eman3682 Год назад

      @@mourka01 @mourka01 l do. But this guy didn't provide any source either. He said Russia has 5:1 or 1:10 artillery advantage even if U.S provides cluster bombs. This bombs are more effective as they cover wider area. 1) A sing cluster bomb is comparable to 10 artillery. 2) U.S has the largest stockpile of artillery of 6 million(look it up). That means Russia should have 50+ million artillery.
      3) U.S, U.K, E.U, South Korea are all giving artillery to Ukraine & increasing production. All have a bigger GDP that Russia. So it's just a matter of time.

    • @NachttiSchlampE65
      @NachttiSchlampE65 Год назад

      ​@@eman3682 pre invasion of 2022 Russia produced 1.7,1.8 mil shells per year and increased that number around summer 22 to around 2.5 mil per year now.
      More than 200k shells per month, your 25k is rather the US production, than the Russian.

    • @NachttiSchlampE65
      @NachttiSchlampE65 Год назад +1

      ​@@eman3682your math would be reasonable in a world, where every country gives away all it has in stock and the industry just waiting for an Ukrainian order.
      Most Western arms factories are far away from your expectations to them and also someone has to pay them.
      Just putting numbers together which may work out in your dreams, but not in reality, is kinda silly

  • @user-vr6io5xb9e
    @user-vr6io5xb9e Год назад +2

    See..Anglophones did it again. Poor Ukrainians and Russians were played off against each other very well. Wake up people!

  • @ris_1982
    @ris_1982 Год назад +10

    Thank God, someone is saying the truth on mainstream media!

  • @The-football-gods
    @The-football-gods Год назад +5

    Finally they got some one smart on there chanel that Ukraine are NOT winning this war and they should have never offered Ukraine to join nato

  • @louisehutauruk1925
    @louisehutauruk1925 Год назад +18

    Prof. John Mearsheimer and Mr. Steve Clemons, thanks for the interview which is academically valuable and based on field facts.

  • @NameRiioz
    @NameRiioz Год назад +5

    "Ukraine will die if it goes for close cooperation with NATO" This quote uttered by a Russian politician is 25 years old. It is certainly the most "unprovoked war".

  • @presidentofukraina
    @presidentofukraina Год назад +2

    NATO should apply to join Ukraine

    • @neptunefog6082
      @neptunefog6082 Год назад

      Not all conditions are met, too many coloured migrants, as you know Ukrainians are a white nazia

  • @jeremynelson8040
    @jeremynelson8040 Год назад +21

    This framework supports the idea that the US would sabatoge nordstream pipeline, as it would make the sanctions more effective and Europe’s dependence cut off

    • @iddrisibrahim9924
      @iddrisibrahim9924 Год назад

      Nazis White people's always wants wars in the world, The world will never forgive you guys

    • @NachttiSchlampE65
      @NachttiSchlampE65 Год назад +1

      Yes
      Also works superb for US ally Norway, selling more of their Gas than ever to their European friends.
      Also makes LNG sells more likely in the future for the USA

    • @jeremynelson8040
      @jeremynelson8040 Год назад

      @@NachttiSchlampE65 so what are we gonna do about it?

    • @NachttiSchlampE65
      @NachttiSchlampE65 Год назад

      @@jeremynelson8040 Well the rather fitting question is, what the options for a regular citizen are. Also depending on where you live and if you got any Sort of authority, economic value/power in the country you live in.
      Spreading information and awareness of whats actually happening is what Im doing in my personal bubble. Im not delusional thinking thats changing anything soon or even at all, but citizens believing the more or less disinformation they are being served, because they dont know better, are easy to command/manipulate for any government in the world.
      Demonstrations and so on are of course a rather easy way to show that citizens arent eating what theyre being served/ not happy with gov decisions.

  • @mohamedhussein9935
    @mohamedhussein9935 Год назад +6

    Wonderful analysis

  • @meo3517
    @meo3517 Год назад +1

    I just never understood why any student of IR, which DC is full of, can not understand the concept of 'Security Dilemma or balance of power' . Did I go to the wrong school?

  • @BrianM78
    @BrianM78 Год назад +2

    Thank you to John Mearsheimer and the host Jerry Springer.

  • @RJ_CocoAndMe
    @RJ_CocoAndMe Год назад +2

    Why did it take Aljazeera this long to get this competent speaker on, basically an expert in this topic

    • @NeoFreshair
      @NeoFreshair Год назад

      Qatari regime is an American puppet despite benefiting from the conflict with higher oil/gas prices

  • @Thesebjustseb
    @Thesebjustseb Год назад +6

    Took AJ long enough to interview Mearsheimer. Too bad the same cannot be said for US networks.

  • @192ali1
    @192ali1 Год назад +1

    The Answer to the opening question:
    Should Mexico joins Warsaw? Should Canada joins Warsaw?

  • @andrewareva4605
    @andrewareva4605 Год назад +18

    Given Zelensky's background of being a movie actor, I always sensed that he believed he could ignore decades of realpolitik thinking and treat the invasion like a Hollywood movie where some magical event would result in some happy ending. Either it was some magical Western weapon system, some collapse of the Russian government maybe caused by sanctions or a popular overthrow or NATO aka US troops deciding to come in to rescue Ukraine like Kuwait with Iraq. I wonder how he will be seen and how Ukraine will see the West after Ukraine is forced to compromise giving up land and ultimately becoming a failed state. Ukraine, who has always been a poor, corrupt state, will no longer get Russian energy transit fees, have huge reconstruction costs, will never realize the fantasy of longterm Russian reparations that resembles post WWII Germany's reparations and will eventually see an end to Western economic support.

    • @colincampbell4261
      @colincampbell4261 Год назад +5

      Lot of words equalling nonsense.

    • @stanfarshtei1291
      @stanfarshtei1291 Год назад +3

      Wishful thinking... Ukraine has always been and will always be. The fact you have to suffer with Ukraine in this one, doesn't change things for Ukrainians. Freedom is worthy more than anything else. Even if half of the Ukrainian population will have to die, Ukrainians won't surrender. Getting back into the Russian influence is worse than dying fighting

    • @andrewareva4605
      @andrewareva4605 Год назад

      @stanfarshtei1291 Shameless to use Ukrrianian deaths to prop up your argument from the comfort of your own home. Book a ticket to Poland and go to Ukraine if believe.

    • @aittit
      @aittit Год назад

      ​@stanfarshtei1291 * Freedom is worth more than anything else* in which fairy tale world you live in?
      Do you actually believe that all this Western backed supports coming at no cost? US is a capitalistic country. They never ever give money for free. They either will get it back as it was given in an initial form, or you have to surrender your entire government to West.
      Ukraine is failing because of West, and the fact that they still strive up to join NATO is an act of folly. They're literally using war and the death of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers to pave their way out of Russia and join the West.
      The bitter truth is, it's never gonna happen, as long as Putin and alike stays in power, Ukraine is not getting out of Russain influence, if they carry on living in the delusion, it's gonna have a catastrophic consequences for an entire country.

    • @kristinad8852
      @kristinad8852 Год назад

      ​@stanfarshtei1291 if you only knew how the war truly started, you would not naively think that you are on the side of good. This is what is sad, that the news is successful in fooling mostly everyone.

  • @kamaludinothman8072
    @kamaludinothman8072 Год назад +1

    Respect him!

  • @calic988
    @calic988 Год назад +3

    Great seeing John on the official media channels.

  • @MakateRapulana
    @MakateRapulana Год назад +1

    The US wrecked the negotiations

  • @mariossaifulshikder
    @mariossaifulshikder Год назад +5

    A very wise man. Great explanation

  • @ak101farhan
    @ak101farhan Год назад +27

    Because Nato doesn't want world war 3. Only way for Ukraine to join is to wait for the war to end. That's the only condition 😂

    • @mabelaero
      @mabelaero Год назад

      The war won’t end until Ukraine provides a neutrality guarantee which means it can never join NATO in any scenario.

    • @steveagola9317
      @steveagola9317 Год назад +1

      I see a Georgia kind of situation....frozen conflict

    • @ak101farhan
      @ak101farhan Год назад

      @@steveagola9317 whats the point in joining nato ? Don't you find it funny its only a military alliance to buy weapons from usa uk france and germany. Thats it. Ukraine will forever be in debt to these nations if it succeeded to stop Russia from taking everything.

    • @rolangk2
      @rolangk2 Год назад

      US will destroy Ukraine. With Ukraine destroyed, there will be no Ukraine to join NATO.

    • @OmegaFares
      @OmegaFares Год назад +3

      It depends how it ends. If Ukraine loses they will have to accept Russia's conditions (so no NATO) and vice versa.

  • @fikarrusdiawan9562
    @fikarrusdiawan9562 Год назад +7

    If only World War 3 happened, then it happened! I'm bored and tired of this world... 😰

    • @Groggybandito
      @Groggybandito Год назад

      For it to be a WW3, Russia would require friends to show up to show, clearly no one will help Russia, it will be Russia vs 35 nation coalition, that's not a WW3, that's the Russian military being wiped off the face of the planet.

    • @hakinadedeji
      @hakinadedeji Год назад

      go have more s*x and you won't be bored and tired of this world

  • @lyndonwatson757
    @lyndonwatson757 Год назад +2

    I'm surprised that they are still letting us see what's going on in Ukraine. They must think that they still have a chance of winning.

  • @TyroPirate
    @TyroPirate Год назад +5

    No mention that the CIA admitted a few days ago that this war is their window of opportunity to take down Putin?
    It’s like this guy was wording things in a way that shows the US simply miscalculating, instead of outright saying that the US is the aggressor just as much as Russia (if not more, since he said that Russia and Ukraine were having negotiations early in the war’s big escalation last year. But who was it that told Ukraine to keep fighting…? Don’t know if it was said in this vid. Strangely enough…)

    • @wuestenfuchs1
      @wuestenfuchs1 Год назад

      The US is actively supporting rhe extension and continuation of hostilities and that is the problem. They rightly see that Russia is the aggressor and that Ukraine initially successfully defended itself. Instead of supporting negoatiations and a ceaaation of hostilities, they decided to double down and arm Ukraine and let them alone fight against Russia. This is a miscalculation because Russia can continue fighting longer than the West can arm Ukraine.

    • @peterrezac881
      @peterrezac881 Год назад

      It was Boris Johnson ex British PM and the US puppet who told Elensky not to sign the deal. Evidently ordered by the US.

    • @jeremynelson8040
      @jeremynelson8040 Год назад

      Please post a link to the CIA video. Doesn’t surprise me they would admit it.

    • @TyroPirate
      @TyroPirate Год назад

      @@jeremynelson8040 IDK if there is a video. News articles quote William Burns saying “Disaffection with the war will continue to gnaw away at the Russian leadership ... That disaffection creates a once-in-a-generation opportunity for us at CIA… We’re not letting it go to waste”
      Maybe I’m not being charitable enough, but I interpret that as political/media speak for them having no intention of letting Ukraine win the war because eventually it might also bleed Russia enough for Putin to be taken down by combining the war with the CIA trying to stir extra civil unrest through Telegram posts (as they are in fact doing). Basically using the Ukrainians as nothing more than disposable assets

    • @colincampbell4261
      @colincampbell4261 Год назад

      More ruzzian lies.

  • @theobservationsreal3291
    @theobservationsreal3291 Год назад +2

    An alternate opinion at this point is highly valued.

  • @muhammadhassan9498
    @muhammadhassan9498 Год назад +7

    finally someone spoke sense.

  • @stephenhall3515
    @stephenhall3515 Год назад

    He is entirely correct. It is as simple as that.

  • @jessechima
    @jessechima Год назад +1

    This is informative news. Thanks John

  • @demonridera
    @demonridera Год назад +1

    Sending weapons is easier than sending boots on the ground. Graveyards being populated is okay only in Ukraine

  • @joem0088
    @joem0088 Год назад +1

    Vilnius central lesson : US-led West will supply but not fight for Ukraine. Nor for Taiwan against China.

    • @iddrisibrahim9924
      @iddrisibrahim9924 Год назад

      Why do you white people's always makes wars in the world 🌎

  • @Topentertaining01
    @Topentertaining01 Год назад +1

    Sincere answers from this interview.
    Nice one Mr. John ....

  • @the1ghost764
    @the1ghost764 11 месяцев назад

    NO NATO For Ukraine.

  • @jamesng7320
    @jamesng7320 Год назад +12

    If Russia knows that Ukraine can't join NATO whilst the war is going on then surely it is going to keep fighting forever. If Russia loses this forever war then it will resort to nuclear weapons. If Russia is winning and Ukraine wants to end the war then it will have to agree never to join NATO. The third option is the best out of the 3 bad ones.

    • @Alex-lg6nz
      @Alex-lg6nz Год назад

      I agree, the third option sounds like the best one.
      The only problem with that, is that Russians no longer trust the West or Ukrainians at all. Some pretty piece of paper with signatures on it will not make the Russians feel secure.

    • @terencemorgan4506
      @terencemorgan4506 Год назад +2

      There is a 4th option and this might explain why NATO membership for Ukraine is not on the table today. USA/Nato might offer to recognized territorial concessions by Ukraine in exchange for remaining Ukrainian territory to be protected by Nato. This might be the only card left for Ukraine to play if Ukraine is going to fight a slow long war which they will eventually lose.

    • @jamesng7320
      @jamesng7320 Год назад +1

      @@terencemorgan4506 Russia will never accept such a deal. Remember, the key reason this whole thing started in the first place was because Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. As for Ukraine, I can't see it ever willingly accepting loss of its territory.

    • @michaelmechanics4062
      @michaelmechanics4062 Год назад +5

      If I may add, I believe the hot war a secondary to the main theater of war which is the economic front. Economic collapse of the European countries particularly will have a bigger bearing on the outcome of this war compared to what happens in Ukraine. Hence, the holding pattern/war of attrition.

    • @delonthomas5049
      @delonthomas5049 Год назад

      It will end up in ?😢😢😢

  • @jeremynelson8040
    @jeremynelson8040 Год назад +2

    When Ukraine declared its independence in its “revolution”, so did the Russian speaking citizenry in the Donbas but they declared their independence from the Ukrainian forces that formed the new government…at that point, when NATO recognized Ukraine’s government, Russia recognized the government in the Donbas (please note, that Ukraine’s population, to the east in the Donbas are all Russian speaking, it is truly a country divided 50/50 by language). Russia recognized the country that spoke its language that was being killed by western nato troops/bombs in attempt to keep Ukraine non-nato which the west promised it would do. Russia is aggressively keeping Ukraine from becoming a NATO or EU member and NATO is the paramilitary force of the US uses to bait countries into an Article 5 guarantee which states NATO will come to save the day if a member. NATO is a military alliance from WW2…it is an existential threat to Russia to have a western “democracy” ie puppet state which spreads US crony capitalism.

    • @colincampbell4261
      @colincampbell4261 Год назад

      Yet more ruzzian propaganda.

    • @LLlap
      @LLlap Год назад

      Huh? What revolution? Ussr dissolved.

  • @billykorg5984
    @billykorg5984 Год назад +12

    What a great professor ❤✌️✌️

    • @bobbymak6964
      @bobbymak6964 Год назад

      Sadly, I agree with the professor. The numbers are on the side of the Russians.

  • @sarikamuneer9486
    @sarikamuneer9486 Год назад +3

    Love him❤

  • @bubavaal4888
    @bubavaal4888 Год назад +2

    More sensible people like this should be your priorities Aljazeera your viewers don't like people like John Bolten and Jack the liers 😂😂😂

  • @walentystankiewicz8486
    @walentystankiewicz8486 Год назад

    Russia stated clearly never, no near future no far future, never means never '"niet". Why bring up this question over and over again.

  • @kwame176
    @kwame176 11 месяцев назад

    He predicted a harsh reaction to the failed coup in Russia. John, stop predicting the future. 😭😭😭

  • @adisar6470
    @adisar6470 Год назад +1

    This interview is honest

    • @LLlap
      @LLlap Год назад

      Yes, you could tell who putin paid off.

  • @arcalabania2333
    @arcalabania2333 Год назад +1

    Both guys are genius.....

  • @neptunefog6082
    @neptunefog6082 Год назад +1

    Grain of sanity

  • @rajeshsolankiusa
    @rajeshsolankiusa Год назад +2

    Expert isn't saying anything! Simply regurgitating mrdia info

  • @deaconfrost6
    @deaconfrost6 Год назад +1

    Facts

  • @tien7742
    @tien7742 Год назад +8

    Excellent analysis👍 💯🌹..

  • @SajtKapitany
    @SajtKapitany Год назад

    Finaly a smart American, all true.

  • @alvarocabreravillalon3363
    @alvarocabreravillalon3363 Год назад

    NATO is already dying...

  • @kgb-files9260
    @kgb-files9260 Год назад

    Actually, our artillery fires between 40 000 - 50 000 every day! Have nobody in collective west noticed how Ukraine resemble surface of Moon?

  • @jbroskito
    @jbroskito Год назад +11

    The American guy always just wants Ukraine to give up. Bet if it was his house he'd be screaming and hollering for 9ll to come save him. Lol funny

    • @loddiecamomileparrot
      @loddiecamomileparrot Год назад

      Guy is a RuZZian troll for sure

    • @SeeLasSee
      @SeeLasSee Год назад +2

      He tells a good tale but he’s sloppy analytically.

    • @abdoultoure2474
      @abdoultoure2474 Год назад +19

      ⁠​⁠@@SeeLasSeehahah saying Mearsheimer analysis is “sloppy” shows that you have no idea who this man lol. Get familiar with his work and you’ll see. It’s not often that he is wrong and on this topic, he is extremely correct and accurate.

    • @Meeko2689
      @Meeko2689 Год назад +1

      American are warmongers only a few are against war

    • @Jay-vj2vi
      @Jay-vj2vi Год назад

      @@SeeLasSee you must be a real clown in real life

  • @awareness6278
    @awareness6278 Год назад

    No body should be a member of nato … let alone encourage it’s expansion .

  • @janwoldens1696
    @janwoldens1696 Год назад

    💥UA will join NATO, when "PIGS WILL FLY"🙈🙉🙊⚖️🇦🇺

  • @dianal3542
    @dianal3542 Год назад

    The sad irony here that it was US who provided Russia with nuclear arsenal by collecting nukes from Ukraine and other former USSR countries.

  • @anaignatowicz2779
    @anaignatowicz2779 Год назад

    NO

  • @mitchellbaker4806
    @mitchellbaker4806 11 месяцев назад

    And that's the bottom line because Mearsheimer said so.

  • @jonathaneffemey944
    @jonathaneffemey944 Год назад

    Thanks for posting.

  • @hamzalubega2943
    @hamzalubega2943 Год назад +1

    Hez very good

  • @nsgnsg4108
    @nsgnsg4108 Год назад +1

    Ireland, mexico and cuba should be part of soviet union

  • @georgekennan6213
    @georgekennan6213 Год назад +5

    OMG MEARSHEIMER IS BACK LESHGOO

  • @inouno77
    @inouno77 Год назад

    Therre was a comment about Taiwan at the end. I didn't understand it. Why was that comparison made? Can anyone explain in a few words, please?

  • @reginadavid2459
    @reginadavid2459 Год назад

    What are all this countries doing in NATO? Where is Athlantic Ocean and where is Poland for example? Actually there should be only UK, Portugal, USA. And why NATO is expanding? Is it nessesary? Or NATO is building another story about Russians being so dangerous? Well that's mean...I don't see any democrasy nowadays nor in the USA nor in Europe. Russia seams to be the only country where you know what is freedom, independance and truth.

  • @_saifr
    @_saifr 11 месяцев назад

    John was right. Putin did take care of prigozhin

  • @nalindownanout3052
    @nalindownanout3052 Год назад +5

    Well explained!👍

  • @HalfofOne
    @HalfofOne Год назад

    Finally, Some common sense!

  • @bhalps
    @bhalps 11 месяцев назад

    Al Jaz given off some heavy BRIC love and Ukraine/NATO hate

  • @OnlyFriendsAreAliens
    @OnlyFriendsAreAliens Год назад

    Oh, well yeah, lets just all lay down fir Russia. Does Mearsheimer really believe Putin will stop there?

  • @MrSlavikman
    @MrSlavikman Год назад

    In Russia's orbit? Until 1917 there had never been a Ukraine, the name literly translates into Hinterland. Ukraine or rather the territories that make it up are historical Russian lands, and have been for since the 9th century.

  • @molos3466
    @molos3466 Год назад

    If we want nuclear war, then, yes.

  • @codecraftsman4302
    @codecraftsman4302 Год назад

    I wonder if Mearsheimer was an advisor to Neville Chamberlain prior to the meeting with Hitler in 1939. Ukraine is today's Czechoslovakia to be gifted to Russia in appeasement is what I see as the subtext of his stated position. I'm not sure of his motivation for being a virtual mouthpiece for Russia but his claims of Ukraine running out of ammunition seems to be pulled from the headlines of RT. The slow progress of the Ukrainian counteroffensive is due to the lack of all the necessary tools: the Ukrainians were taught the principles of NATO warfare but weren't given the tools like sufficient armour or the airpower like F16 fighters. They are essentially forced to attempt combined arms operations with one of the arms missing.

  • @atiyaababenson7955
    @atiyaababenson7955 Год назад +5

    This is one of few true leaders or men in the world today❤

    • @SeeLasSee
      @SeeLasSee Год назад

      He tells a good tale but he’s sloppy analytically.

    • @TheReferrer72
      @TheReferrer72 Год назад

      He's not a leader. He is probably on Putler's payroll

  • @janwoldens1696
    @janwoldens1696 Год назад

    💥the latest info re artillery (22 July) UA fires 3 000 rounds per day, RF fires regularly 60 000 per day, as a result 75% of UA's KIA and injured are result of artillery. Full STOP⚖️🇦🇺🙃

  • @evifiouri4712
    @evifiouri4712 Год назад

    The answer is no

  • @prabhakararaoaravapalli9050
    @prabhakararaoaravapalli9050 Год назад +8

    Thank you Prof John M .
    Your thoughts on this Ukraine are most logical , Crystal clear . Well appreciated by many many world over .
    I like your points a lot .
    I feel if Ukraine is looking for serious and effective security guarantees ...it may be Russia and not NATO ....
    Under Zelensky , Ukraine got devastated and NATO is still watching the destruction from the banks and not doing anything real effective on the ground ...

    • @TecraX2
      @TecraX2 Год назад +2

      @@ak537 Also, Ukraine already had a security guarantee from Russia in the Budapest Memorandum, and think everyone can see how much that was worth!

    • @prabhakararaoaravapalli9050
      @prabhakararaoaravapalli9050 Год назад

      Prof in his earlier speeches, mentioned that Ukraine should have been left Nutral .
      West has instigated Ukraine to join Nato and caused this war ..
      Before Feb 2022, Ukraine has several means at its disposal to avoid this war .
      Now Ukraine is devastated but Nato is still not able to save Ukraine.

    • @prabhakararaoaravapalli9050
      @prabhakararaoaravapalli9050 Год назад

      @@ak537 this war is instigated by outsiders. ...this war brought misery to both Russia and Ukraine .
      Immediate need is peace.
      Ukraine and Russia should work for immediate peace ...
      That both almost reached a peace deal last March or April ..but that deal was dashed by others ...

  • @logiczchance101
    @logiczchance101 Год назад

    more like, why they won't join ... ever.

  • @jamiluhassan4823
    @jamiluhassan4823 Год назад

    What makes this delay for Ukraine to be part of NATO aliens?

  • @DefaultTheseus
    @DefaultTheseus Год назад

    Thanks for an incredible treat AJ.

  • @user-op8vq2en4j
    @user-op8vq2en4j Год назад

    Goodness hes good.

  • @barumbadum
    @barumbadum Год назад

    Thank you prof Mearsheimer.

  • @petronelastelawhite-anca7964
    @petronelastelawhite-anca7964 Год назад

    😮 There is GENOCIDE really!😮 R.I.P. TO THE INOCENT HUMANS WHO LOST THEIR LIVES IN THIS POLITICAL TURMOIL! I honestly wonder...how comes this 2x once upon a time were closet of friends; became enemies???😢

  • @Flyinghigh888
    @Flyinghigh888 Год назад

    Use and disposal, typical western playbook!

  • @ueihgnurt
    @ueihgnurt Год назад

    US basically abbandon Afghanistan. Wdym they won't do the same to Ukriane. 😂
    remember there still no NATO membership.

  • @Topentertaining01
    @Topentertaining01 Год назад

    Sincere answers from this interview.
    Nice one

  • @avicohen5683
    @avicohen5683 Год назад +2

    The question is why NATO not let Ukraine to joint NATO, because they know Russia will crush them

  • @kristinmedica7229
    @kristinmedica7229 Год назад

    Hey Schimer..
    Im getting disgusted with your bigoted comments about who " these people" are that believe Ukraine will win this terrible war of aggression by
    Russia.