The Freemasons' Influence on the Bible
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 сен 2023
- Full Video - • Unexpected Corruption ...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @hamzasden
© 2022 Hamza's Den All Rights Reserved
Please support us by donating. Jazak'Allahu Khairan to you all
Help Build Eman Foundation Masjid: gofund.me/d45959d7
Paypal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/hamza...
Patreon: / hamzasden
Social media
Facebook: / hamzas-den-10066183176...
Twitter: / hamza_den
Instagram: / hamzasden4
TikTok: / hamzasden
Videos Edited & Channel Managed by: @beniqracreative
The man dealt with that like a gentleman , no shouting and whinging
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
He is lying though...
@@Carl-tc2yb who is lying ?
How can you lie about an opinion , unless he really doesn’t believe in it
@samwright6168 the Muslim 'cleric' is lying.
The full list of authors is still available and Sir Francis Bacon does not appear on it.
Further, original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts confirm the accuracy of the translation into English. As did the dead Sea scrolls discovered years later.
They will NEVER get this Knowledge in School neither in Church
Its called the hidden hand for a reason...😂
Honestly, they won’t be told this in school, or even in church for that matter. But this fellow Hamza is talking to is respectful, May Allah s.w.t guide him.
my favorite part is when he takes his time to think more about it
Why would schools teach baseless claims?
1. We have the records detailing the 47 scholars and clergyman involved in translating the King James Version. Sir Francis Bacon is not in the list and there is zero evidence he and any involvement at all.
2. There is scant evidence to support the claim that either King James or Sir Francis Bacon were active Freemasons.
3. Freemasonry grew out of the stonemason guilds. The historical evidence shows the rituals and rights of Freemasonry developed through the later part of the 17th and 18th centuries, after the rule of King James.
Hamza really should fact check what he hears before repeating it.
Who wrote ur QOOORAN, if you hear that you will run away.
@@autolancegega599 ok, tell us then
gaslighting is indeed the best tool to turn the sun dark while the moon stained red
Oh what??? 😮 As a Muslim alhamdulillah,
I didn't know that. It shocked me. It hardens my Iman more on Qur'an after knowing that.
Jesus is the only way .God can use anybody to do his work whether king James or Queen Jane ..dosent matter .Paul was a hater and murderer of Christians and became one of the Bible writers .this Hamza guy does not know the power of the almighty God ..he should more talk about how Islam was influenced by the Roman Catholic church .Google it
But you have no evidence LOL how can you just believe a man’s words like that 😂😂😂😂 you Muslims are hilarious “oh wow that shocked me” 😂😂😂😂 HES JUST SAYING WORDS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL 💀
@@itzkamo_1091 احبة برسوم المرشومة
You believe in lamb 🐑
Or 3 in one shampoo 😂😂
it's not true. the king James translation is a top most accurate translation from the hebrew, chaldean, greek, and aramaic. and Francis bacon DID NOT edit the bible.
There are 47 scholars and clergyman that did translation work for the King James Bible. Bacon is not one of them. Hamza is a liar. Without lies Islam dies.
Over seven years, 47 scholars and theologians worked to translate the different books of the Bible: the Old Testament from Hebrew, the New Testament from Greek and the Apocrypha from Greek and Latin. Much of the resulting translation drew on the work of the Protestant reformer William Tyndale, who had produced the first New Testament translation from Greek into English in 1525.
My exact point,who knows who wrote the bible, how many diluted versions nnhentybthe 8th?
@@darren2508 But when the Bible(s) is compared to manuscripts going back to the Drad Sea scrolls they are in harmony. The "translations" you need to question and stay away from are those like the transition of the Jehovah's Witnesses, for an example. Their errors are so evident that a person need not be a greek or Hebrew scholar.
In the accepted translation of John 1:1 It says:
"In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God."
The Jehovah's Witness Bible it says:
"In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the Word was a god."
The greek was written with the first person singular present indicative; a prolonged form of a primary and defective verb befor the word God... nv theos = was God.
The Jehovah's Witness Bible was translated with a "definate article "a" before the word god, which shows up no where in any greek manuscripts.
@@darren2508 What this Muslim is saying cannot be taken in any other way but a Muslim will always try and discount the Bible and Christianity...
Come on people think. This Muslim will NEVER be an apologist for Christianity.
Over seven years, 47 scholars and theologians worked to translate the different books of the Bible: the Old Testament from Hebrew, the New Testament from Greek and the Apocrypha from Greek and Latin. Much of the resulting translation drew on the work of the Protestant reformer William Tyndale, who had produced the first New Testament translation from Greek into English in 1525 but was executed for heresy less than a decade later.
The original texts were verified by the early Church fathers that lived during and after the New Testament was written.
Time and generations are NOT exact. In your day... In your life people were, and are born that live during your life and can say that they read your book and testify to anyoone born after your death that your book is exactly what you wrote.
Take Einstein for example. There were scientists that were alive when Einstein wrote his works and theories and can verify to those who were born after he died that it was Einstein who actually wrote the books.
Early church fathers like Polycarp was alive during the time of Paul's writing, for example who verified Paul's writing... He verified the gospels because he was alive when they were written... And so on and so on.
This Muslim is anti-Christ so why in the world would he attest to the authority of the scriptures?
Christians are following the teachings of anti christ Paul’s teachings written by him in a book called Bible!
Jesus specifically told (ordered) his desciples not to go n preach to Gentiles!
His desciples abided but Paul, a self appointed apostle a self proclaimed authority went against ALL the teachings of Jesus eg. worshipping One Father almighty, forgiveness only thru faith not by acts+faith, circumcission, preaching to Gentiles… etc
He even had other desciples killed!
@@jerrybeaird9292lol
1604 and published in 1611, by sponsorship of King James, Richard Bancroft, the archbishop of Canterbury-was notable for having the role of overseer of the project, something akin to a modern editor of a collection of short stories. The actual translating (writing) of the KJV was done by a committee of 47 scholars and clergymen over the course of many years. So we cannot say for certain which individual wrote a given passage.
Exactly the point. So many holes and imperfect preservation
@@abzy4368not hamza's point at all. He claimed Bacon edited the KJV. There's no evidence he had anything to do with it. The Freemasons weren't set up until 20 years after bacon died. Hamza has no basis for his claims
@@paulrawlinson8653 Your statement of establishment of freemasons is stupid. For example it is equivalent to saying there was no LGBTQ people and ideologies before setting up of LGBTQ community 🤦♂️
@@sirajmussafirr147can you tell me which passages were changed by the Freemasons before and after revisions then?
@sirajmussafirr147 there have been stone masons since biblical times. However, freemasons are, by definition, members of the Freemasonry organisation. You can't be a member of an organisation that doesn't yet exist. And there is little evidence ( but plenty of mythology) about the existence of Freemasonry before the early 1600's. So it's not a stupid statement. There is no evidence that Bacon was a Freemason, one of the important parts of that evidence is that the Freemason organisation was not established until at least 20 years after his death. The first Grand Lodge didn't appear in England until 100 years after his death. It's like claiming someone worked for Apple computers in 1970 because they worked with Steve Jobs on computers, but Apple wasn't established until 1976. You cant work for a company that doesn't yet exist.
🕋 Jazak’Allah Khair brother and Allah Al Qadir ala kulli shayin be thy protector Amin
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
🤦🤣I find it hysterical when a muslim talks about addition to books because Quran is full of it. We'll first disprove Islam and then we'll talk about Bible. Welcome to the realm where muslim minds cease to work 🤦
1. Where does Quran say its the Word of
Allah? It doesnt.
Word of God is God for a Christian and
He was revealed in flesh as Jesus as
prophecied. The God, His Word and His
Spirit are One. Bible is not the actual
Word but Jesus is. Bible doesn't says its
the entire book Word of God, Bible is
Holy scriptures which was revealed by
inspiration of HolySpirit.
QS 2:106 - States better verses were
given and some abrogated.
(q1)Didn't Allah know better verse while
giving the first ones?
(q2)Allah's eternal speech can be
deleted? How can an eternal entity be
abrogated?
3. QS 12:111 - states Quran is a details
exposition of all things, they why do you read hadiths? Isn't Allah's explanation of all things enough for muslims?
4. QS 6:115 - states no one should change what Allah has commanded then why did Muhammad abrogate Mu'tah?
5 Why did Uthaman burn different types pf Quran with different verses? Why does Birmingham copy differ from hafs Quran in circulation?
About the Bible you're talking about two TRANSLATIONS. The manuscript used is called Textus Receptus. The manuscript contained footnotes which made into Bible as verses by translators hence they were not found in older manuscripts.
The NT manuscripts which existed centuries before Muhammad match 97% to what we have now.
The OT that we have resembles 98% of what is in Dead Sea scrolls dates back 300 years before Jesus and 900-1000 years for Muhammad.
The missing verses never changed the doctrine of Bible.
Leads to another question
6. QS 6:115 says Quran confirms the previous books, which it clearly does not, they why not agree Quran is false?
Ameen 🤲
80
@@shagunpsuresh639 “And if any one of the polytheists seeks your protection, then grant him protection so that he may hear THE WORDS OF ALLAH.” (Qur’an, 9:6)
This should give a hint on how weak the points you mentioned really are and how easily dismantled they could be.
That man is here to learn, not to argue. A true gentleman
sad he is learning from a liar
@@matejsilakhummel4 and you are a blind sheep
His answered is i dont know.... Further more is i dont want to know... 😂😂😂
@@Era-lk1lowhat is?
Abang botak.....
Never stop learn untill you die, but becarefull, the devil/syaitan will never surrender to trick you..." May Allah SWT always protect us/muslim from the evil of the syaitan"....
@@botakgelap9366 orang Malaysia ke?
@@Era-lk1lo i did a quick Google search on francis bacon, and apparently, it's not just a Facebook shitpost, there's several theories as well for his involvement, one with the freemasons, other with the occult (illuminati). So i don't really get your point here..... My search is less than a minute... So what is the play here?
Case closed
Nah
Yes indeed
@@yovanaswha3770
THE ANALYSIS
The claim that Sir Francis Bacon edited a version of the King James Bible has been around for more than a century, however there is no evidence of his involvement in the substantial documentation surrounding the book’s lengthy translation and editing process.
Experts on Sir Francis and the King James Bible dismissed the suggestion that the statesman edited the Bible as baseless.
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was a barrister later recognised for his writing and thought who served under King James I as solicitor general and later attorney general. He was knighted in 1603.
The process of formally translating what came to be known as the King James Bible began in 1604 under the supervision of the Archbishop of Canterbury, with the book intended to supersede several other English translations. These translations included one authorised by King Henry VIII and published in 1539. Until 1536, it had been forbidden to produce a Bible in English.
The King James Bible translation work was done by a committee of 47 scholars and clergymen, a list of whom appears here. Sir Francis is not included in the list.
@@Era-lk1loI love how your research is the first page of google XD so stupid
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
Bro, this is knowledge. Thanks
May allah reward hamzah for his, great job ❤
Yes he will definitely go to HELL!
FOR SPREADING LIES AND DECEPTION!
✝️🛐one true GOD
@@Christ_theking333 debate him at hyde park, not here bro
@@Podolsky89
I dnt talk to Fools bro 😎
It’s like breaking your head to the wall !
@@Christ_theking333 may allah guide you
@@Podolsky89
May One true God open your eyes and mind
✝️🛐
Just a general observation, he could say many things that can’t be proven or disproven immediately. 99% of the people watching this will not do the work and either just believe or not, and that’s what these types count on. He could say 10 things that were absolute fact, and another 2 or 3 as well that were kind of close, and most people wouldn’t know the difference.
Jazakallah brother for this point we didn't know about if that is true.
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
🤦🤣I find it hysterical when a muslim talks about addition to books because Quran is full of it. We'll first disprove Islam and then we'll talk about Bible. Welcome to the realm where muslim minds cease to work 🤦
1. Where does Quran say its the Word of
Allah? It doesnt.
Word of God is God for a Christian and
He was revealed in flesh as Jesus as
prophecied. The God, His Word and His
Spirit are One. Bible is not the actual
Word but Jesus is. Bible doesn't says its
the entire book Word of God, Bible is
Holy scriptures which was revealed by
inspiration of HolySpirit.
QS 2:106 - States better verses were
given and some abrogated.
(q1)Didn't Allah know better verse while
giving the first ones?
(q2)Allah's eternal speech can be
deleted? How can an eternal entity be
abrogated?
3. QS 12:111 - states Quran is a details
exposition of all things, they why do you read hadiths? Isn't Allah's explanation of all things enough for muslims?
4. QS 6:115 - states no one should change what Allah has commanded then why did Muhammad abrogate Mu'tah?
5 Why did Uthaman burn different types pf Quran with different verses? Why does Birmingham copy differ from hafs Quran in circulation?
About the Bible you're talking about two TRANSLATIONS. The manuscript used is called Textus Receptus. The manuscript contained footnotes which made into Bible as verses by translators hence they were not found in older manuscripts.
The NT manuscripts which existed centuries before Muhammad match 97% to what we have now.
The OT that we have resembles 98% of what is in Dead Sea scrolls dates back 300 years before Jesus and 900-1000 years for Muhammad.
The missing verses never changed the doctrine of Bible.
Leads to another question
6. QS 6:115 says Quran confirms the previous books, which it clearly does not, they why not agree Quran is false?
@@shagunpsuresh639There is no addition in the Quran, I'll make that clear. It is literally a fact that has been accepted worldwide because we have the original versions still here. Plus, the Arabic is still the same, no matter what people say and ascribe to it. Furthermore, there are people that have Memorized the Quran word for word, letter for letter, for centuries and in millions. so even if someone tries something the original cannot be destroyed and will always be prevalent and people will point out the attempt and stop it.
@@shagunpsuresh639
😂😂a man cannot be a word. Unless Jesus was part of the alphabet and made out of letters he cannot literally be a “word”. 😅😅😅
The bible has evolved over time and many books have been added or removed later. Even today chrstians in east Africa have a different bible, that contains different books from those approved by Freemason king James
@@shagunpsuresh639Let's talk about the authors of gospels. Can you tell us who is the authors of 4 gospels?
Poor man, he realize that he defend fake religion blindly and begin to confirm white cap man message. May god bless both of them.
If you fail once why not twice he tought :)
what makes a religion fake and what makes it real? The god or the people or both or neither or something else?
Look it up there is proof
@@matejsilakhummel4The incorrect theology of it, which is islam.
Richard Bancroft (1544 - 2 November 1610) was an English churchman, Archbishop of Canterbury from 1604 to 1610 and "chief overseer" of the King James Bible.
Translators translated the kjv out of original languages, freemasonry had nothing to do with it
It wasnt just translated is what he is saying,it was Edited. My comment is to johnfitzgerald saying that the guy in the video isn't just saying they translated the bible but actually changed it or "Edited" it for beneficial reasons... I don't know the history of the kjv bible but the comment to me says that Fitzgerald only listened to a limited bit and diddnt quite get the meaning or message behind the video
@@mikeryan4055 There is no evidence that Francis Bacon had anything to do with the translation or editing of the 1611 King James translation of the Bible. Any assertion that "Masonic Influence" was supposedly introduced by Francis Bacon or anyone else is not based in historical fact. Not only that, but Hamza provided no evidence or examples of alleged Masonic tampering with the 1611 King James Version. Assertions on history presented without evidence should not be taken seriously.
@@alexanderhuber3154 I never claimed or argued, that was the case.??
Even before kjv and the catholic church revising the Bible up to 21 councils of Nicea. Removing countless important books. The Ethiopian has 84-88 and Greek orthodox holding 76-79
@@alexanderhuber3154
Excellent point but people cannot think this critically they are so overwhelmed by Hamza straight face while he says this claim. In the United Kingdom heaven know the religious or politically persuasions of policy makers and law makers.. some of them are secretly into Nazism .. does that me that Nazism has influence British Politics
Matthew 15:14
Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.”
Your blind for ignoring the fact that the bible was edited by a Freemason. Ironic you say this quote
Ayo u still using that, meanwhile bible has been revised by a masonic people
@@seikokun8805they don’t learn
@@seikokun8805and the quran was written 500yrs after Jesus. If u don't wana read ghe kjv u can pick yourself up the direct Greek translations. Islams arguments are invalid when they try to refute the Bible but also with the same breath say they believe what is said in it
@@nahshondaniel5824 yes it's correct that Quran were revealed after Jesus, so what's the problem?
She was 9 when he consummated the marriage..... Utterly disgusting
Mashallah brother, I am a student of knowledge and I'm trying to learn as much as I can from all religions
Especially mine ,
I've been at that for nearly 2 years debating just like you , you've motivated me and I've learned a lot from you and many others
Even I did not know this point
Thank you very much.
"Clearly influence," "clearly." The claim that Francis Bacon edited a version of the King James Bible has been around for about a century, however there is no evidence of his involvement in the substantial documentation surrounding the book’s lengthy translation and editing process. The King James Bible translation work was done by a committee of 47 scholars and clergymen (you can look up the names). Bacon is not included in the list of the committee. The purported link between Sir Francis and the King James Bible can be traced to the 1905 book The Mystery of Francis Bacon by William T. Smedley, which also includes conjecture that Sir Francis was the true author of Shakespeare’s plays. I would love for this habitual liar to actually say what in the KJV was influenced by free masons?
It's a simple question, you can't make such outrageous assertions without providing a shred of evidence.
To be a debater like Hamza, you have to be able to lie at will.
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
@@rudycataldo3653 oh? Even so the Bible was edited many times by many diffirent men and kings
To suit their political regime yet you take it as the word of God
This is of course evident through the many contradictions found within , over 100 contradictions just off my head alone and many diffirent versions
My point being is the Bible is far from perfect and you can't deny that, it may have some good teachings and it may have some bad teachings within
I've just looked it up , both king James and sir Francis are freemasons, James was a Kjv commissioner and Francis was a KJV Editor.
@@rudycataldo3653 My brother in Islam doesn't need to lie , truth stands out clear from falsehood
And upon further research and inspection he spoke the truth
This really an important piece of information need to be well researched & varified
They compare the bible to the dead sea Scrolls and it the same
THAT explains the removal of 1john 5:7 "For there are 3 father son and holy ghost and these 3 are one" this verse is only in 1611 original KJV bible and is removed in every new version bible because the pastors say it isn't pesent in the new manuscripts found this means the Bible was indeed edited and not by any person but by a freeason the Illuminati group 😮 who always wanted to deviate the people from God aka Polytheism, that's confirmed these free mason Satanist corrupted the bible, the devil wanted to remove polytheism from the Bible 😮 and tell the people the wrong way
Masha Allah
Well explain my brother
St Cyprian of Carthage AD258 quotes this verse in his commentary on 1John5, way before the 1611 KJV.
@@georgiacap9294the NIV which is based of earlier greek manuscripts says blood water and spirit no mention of trinity
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
@@Thugnificent99 exactly
Omg!!! KING JAMES IS A FREEMASON --and FRANCIS BACON 🥓 -ok. Everyone is done.
Also that means that likely EVERY book out there that the masses follow has been influenced by them. Look at Billy Carsons teachings, this is likely the right track
Alhamdulliah, I'm Muslim. Honestly, I'm so grateful to be on this beautiful new journey. Allah Akbar ❤
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
"Clearly influence," "clearly." The claim that Francis Bacon edited a version of the King James Bible has been around for about a century, however there is no evidence of his involvement in the substantial documentation surrounding the book’s lengthy translation and editing process. The King James Bible translation work was done by a committee of 47 scholars and clergymen (you can look up the names). Bacon is not included in the list of the committee. The purported link between Sir Francis and the King James Bible can be traced to the 1905 book The Mystery of Francis Bacon by William T. Smedley, which also includes conjecture that Sir Francis was the true author of Shakespeare’s plays. I would love for this habitual liar to actually say what in the KJV was influenced by free masons?
It's a simple question, you can't make such outrageous assertions without providing a shred of evidence.
Was King James a freemason? There is evidence to suggest he was. If a freemason is commissioning a revised translation of the bible, then this is "clearly influence".
That’s when people think the KJV is the only Scriptures out there. The Ethiopians have scriptures at least 100 years before the KJV!
@@BRESHEET The KJV is just an English TRANSLATION.
Without lies Islam dies bro
Absolutely agree with all of you.
You know when the video has fact check that it’s on point 😂
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
Maasha Allah ❤
So - masonic influence on the King Jame's version of the bible, sure.
But that is not the same as masonic influence on 'the bible' in general, for example, the NIV Bible, which is really one of the more common English language editions people read today.
Also - you need to do more than just assert 'influence'. Do you have any examples of verses that were improperly translated as a result of this 'influence'? Some difference in meaning from other editions?
exactly, basically what I said too. Destroy every KJV of the bible we still have the bible. But even if you take this claim serious, what exactly was "changed" to promote the free masons, or in any manner, that changed the original message and meaning of the bible? Hamza has the most ridicules claims and arguments, yet Muslims take him to be so wise and able to "destroy" Christianity. But his arguments only work on those who are totally clueless of the bible and Christian theology.
@@daffy4Christ every verse is important like for example “The father and I are the same” which could be any other thing but wrongly translated yet chrsitians use it as a clear evidence for the trinity, so don’t tell me that if a verse is changed it’s not a big problem, yes it is a big problem bro cause it can contradict with other verses and cause confusion.
If something came from God, wouldn’t it be perfect? Why change it? Is it not good enough? Why not read it in original language? Why have 3000 different versions?
@@Belomoh6so people can understand it. Giving someone the original Aramaic or Greek passages would be stupid. Look at the Quran, most people that read it don't actually understand the arabic and it's full of gibberish words that isn't even understood with modern Arabic
@@C3lticlord Giving them different language changes the meaning most of the time.
Even Quran when translated to english, it’s translanted based mainly on meaning of the verse to not cause confusion.
Also your claim about the Quran is completely false. The Quran has some words that we don’t use in our daily talking but it’s still in our language and we can just open a dictionary, and get the meaning, that’s why the Quran isn’t translated to any dialect or any “new arabic”.
@@C3lticlord yet the Quran has only one Arabic version for all Arab speakers and it’s still the same since it came from God
They needed a Freemasons Bible. They commissioned one. Other Christians thought, how nice of him, let's use his Bible.
The translation was done by six panels of translators (47 men in all, most of whom were leading biblical scholars in England)
That’s why Catholics don’t use a KJV Bible. We use a translation from the Septuagint, which St. Jerome translated to the Latin Vulgate where we got our Douay Rheims Bible in 1583-1604.
If that's true, compare KJV to the original Greek texts. Something people have done for ages. All tools for this are available. Issue solved!
These bozos think they’ve got it all figured out what the church fathers and 2000 years of scholarship couldn’t.
Dawah guys are pure wisdom and intellect embodied in human form. Geniuses the lot of them.
The differences from the earliest known agreed upon texts and then comprehend the comprehensive amount of changes... rewrites and in wine consortia complete deletions of whole scripture an even like rewriting John 8:6...
@@Azzury. Which is exactly why the RSV and NRSV were written and are used as the standard Bibles in Seminary School and University Bible Classes. Sure thing!
The popular belief that Francis Bacon was a freemason hasn't been proven in any way so far. Bacon wasn't one of the acholars appointed by King James either, he was very much occupied with being a chancellor at that time
Yes.
Hamza is spitting lies left and right. Francis Bacon was connected to the KJV in a book from 1905 with ZERO credibility.
Bro your username doesn’t help
@@mspace2338 And why is that?
@@mspace2338brother their secret society isn't a secret anymore. They tell on themselves
lol your name youre one of them
was the person to collect the Quran since "he used to write the Divine Inspiration for Allah's Apostle". Thus, a group of scribes, most importantly Zayd, collected the verses and produced a hand-written manuscript of the complete book.
My RUclips algorithm hates me.
You hate yourself.
I feel you
I'm right there with you. You comment once on something similar, so suddenly, it's all I clearly want to see.
@@MrAustra95its ment that way. I could you so much. But msg disappear. There is a war on ppl on the west..on Europeans.
Just push the Dont interrested button. Then they know better how to trigger you :)
Ma sha Allah. May Allah swt give you istiqamah and grant you a long life full of giving dawah brother Hamza. May Allah swt preserve you and your progeny in his service.
Hamza is literally getting his information from a debunked British meme. It's no wonder this guy was crushed by James White and runs from anyone. Imagine getting your information from a debunked meme. 😂😂😂
Keep my name out ya mouth
then debunk him, you're just laughing, contributed *nothing* .
Alhamdulillah not even a freemasonic can corrupt Al-Quran. Because the Quran is guarded by Allah.
Tabaraka allah brother
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
🤦🤣I find it hysterical when a muslim talks about addition to books because Quran is full of it. We'll first disprove Islam and then we'll talk about Bible. Welcome to the realm where muslim minds cease to work 🤦
1. Where does Quran say its the Word of
Allah? It doesnt.
Word of God is God for a Christian and
He was revealed in flesh as Jesus as
prophecied. The God, His Word and His
Spirit are One. Bible is not the actual
Word but Jesus is. Bible doesn't says its
the entire book Word of God, Bible is
Holy scriptures which was revealed by
inspiration of HolySpirit.
QS 2:106 - States better verses were
given and some abrogated.
(q1)Didn't Allah know better verse while
giving the first ones?
(q2)Allah's eternal speech can be
deleted? How can an eternal entity be
abrogated?
3. QS 12:111 - states Quran is a details
exposition of all things, they why do you read hadiths? Isn't Allah's explanation of all things enough for muslims?
4. QS 6:115 - states no one should change what Allah has commanded then why did Muhammad abrogate Mu'tah?
5 Why did Uthaman burn different types pf Quran with different verses? Why does Birmingham copy differ from hafs Quran in circulation?
About the Bible you're talking about two TRANSLATIONS. The manuscript used is called Textus Receptus. The manuscript contained footnotes which made into Bible as verses by translators hence they were not found in older manuscripts.
The NT manuscripts which existed centuries before Muhammad match 97% to what we have now.
The OT that we have resembles 98% of what is in Dead Sea scrolls dates back 300 years before Jesus and 900-1000 years for Muhammad.
The missing verses never changed the doctrine of Bible.
Leads to another question
6. QS 6:115 says Quran confirms the previous books, which it clearly does not, they why not agree Quran is false?
Fun fact, the Quran was written over 600 years later after Christ.
And?
@@AzelVonAzrael 😂
Have you read the Quran?
It contains plagiarized material in part but twisting the truth from the Bible
Muslims think the comforter was Mohammad yet Jesus sent the Holy Spirit not Mohammad😂
Anything mentioned in the Quran about Jesus was taken from the Bible because Jesus was accented hundreds of years after Mohammad 😂
The Quran is not from God but from Satan to pull people away from the truth about salvation in Christ
Get a grip and ready the Bible for yourself! God the father loves you and wants you to be saved in Jesus!
Do u know what last sentence in Quran ,Gods words Mohammad s.a.v.s is on death bed so God said My ppl i left u a book perfected it now that book is caled Quran and i leave it to u as guidence and ur religion will be Islam.
Over 700 years and like most religion it's just a way of controlling the population
The version of the Quaran used by most Muslims was only canonised in 1924.
How come over a billion Muslims can memorise the Quran but most churches have less than 20 elderly people in church every Sunday?
Because the Bible is filled with truth. And for most the truth is hard to hear or read about
@@nahshondaniel5824 thats not true
I don't agree with either side but the Quran has 70,000+ word and the Bible has 700,000+ words
@@nahshondaniel5824if it's filled with the truth why are there so many direct contradiction in the Bible?
Muslims will hurt you if you don't memorize the book ,,,it's mandatory noo options....
"Our Lord descends every night to the sky of this world when the last third of the night remains."
Well... its always night somewhere so he must surely spend all his time in creation and therefore cannot be God.
Allah Hamza abimizi korusun
🤦🤣I find it hysterical when a muslim talks about addition to books because Quran is full of it. We'll first disprove Islam and then we'll talk about Bible. Welcome to the realm where muslim minds cease to work 🤦
1. Where does Quran say its the Word of
Allah? It doesnt.
Word of God is God for a Christian and
He was revealed in flesh as Jesus as
prophecied. The God, His Word and His
Spirit are One. Bible is not the actual
Word but Jesus is. Bible doesn't says its
the entire book Word of God, Bible is
Holy scriptures which was revealed by
inspiration of HolySpirit.
QS 2:106 - States better verses were
given and some abrogated.
(q1)Didn't Allah know better verse while
giving the first ones?
(q2)Allah's eternal speech can be
deleted? How can an eternal entity be
abrogated?
3. QS 12:111 - states Quran is a details
exposition of all things, they why do you read hadiths? Isn't Allah's explanation of all things enough for muslims?
4. QS 6:115 - states no one should change what Allah has commanded then why did Muhammad abrogate Mu'tah?
5 Why did Uthaman burn different types pf Quran with different verses? Why does Birmingham copy differ from hafs Quran in circulation?
About the Bible you're talking about two TRANSLATIONS. The manuscript used is called Textus Receptus. The manuscript contained footnotes which made into Bible as verses by translators hence they were not found in older manuscripts.
The NT manuscripts which existed centuries before Muhammad match 97% to what we have now.
The OT that we have resembles 98% of what is in Dead Sea scrolls dates back 300 years before Jesus and 900-1000 years for Muhammad.
The missing verses never changed the doctrine of Bible.
Leads to another question
6. QS 6:115 says Quran confirms the previous books, which it clearly does not, they why not agree Quran is false?
@@shagunpsuresh639 dont talk inşallah hindu,dont talk
@shagunpsuresh639 99%, of your "points" are nothing more than strawman claims....
For example on your last claim, you said that why does it claim the previous scriptures are true?
That's the thing, the Gospel given to Jesus, Is no where to be found. All you have are anonymous Gospels written ABOUT Jesus, decades after his departure from the world.... it says in the Quran, Injeel (Gospel) given TO Christ.
The Bible is a compilation of several books from anonymous authors, aside from the face that it's earliest manuscripts are in Greek, while Jesus and his disciples spoke Hebrew.
@@shagunpsuresh639 missing verses never changed the doctrine of the Bible? 💀
From Jesus' time until the 3rd century, there was never any mention of trinity or 3 in 1, which only came and became a thing specifically by the Council of Nicea... before that, Christians never worshipped or considered Jesus divine in any way. The Church fathers have enrolled this new doctrine into your teachings, so you follow the Church, not Jesus.
You really don't know your history at all LOL
@@Joseph_MD dude where's your proof of the book that Jesus was revealed? A book so important yet no history of it? Jesus split the time into two halfs if a book was revealed to him that should have been important yet no proof of it? It doesn't exists. You can lie all you want but the fact that Quran doesn't confirms the previous books is crystal clear for anyone, even for atheists.
Anonymousity of writers is not truly anonymous, the proofs relating to authorship got destroyed by 300 years of genocide and that's the only thing you have to point about Bible. But Quran on the other is extremely contradictory, doesn't passes its own standards, gives false information and i can just go on and on about it. .
The Quran is not preserved, the hafs Quran of 1924 is not what is in Birmingham. So Allah never preserved the book like the book says. Contradicts both Injeel and Torah which the book says it confirms. So to hide these, dawah hides behind Bible and says look the Bible is corrupted and poor muslims believe their words. Those who raise voices are killed in middle east. If Middle east was as liberal as the west then Islam would have beem forgotten long ago. That's why muslims choose west over oil rich middle east. So believe in your lies till Jesus comes or read the Bible and know the real God. God bless.
I like this dialog, very respectful.
And the south african history is told us in german schools as the lost of the colonialism instead of the win of the people!
What a shame
I love that cheeky smile when he knows he's got em...😂
hamza is man-lion ❤
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
Masha Allah
Silly Argument.
Hamza is a white man and he's presenting an argument.
That definitely means that there's a white man's influence on his argument.
Its not silly its true thoo. The question is. How much. How significant it influences his decision. Human is social creature after all.
Lol hit a nerve did it
Eh even if they edit it doesnt matter cause we can go back, we have early manuscripts so we can compare so ur point is useless
Correct. The Eastern Orthodox Church has earlier Bibles in Greek kept in monasteries.
Hamza's been refuted a thousand times, but his muslim brothers don't see it. Let's pray for God to change their hearts
If God wanted you to follow Christianity then he would have preserved it for you. Jesus pbuh came for the Jews, who rejected him.
@@n.a114
Correct. Jesus did come for His chosen people the Jews firstly, but they did reject Him, although His disciples and many other Jewish people did accept Him as the Messiah. Before Jesus ascended to heaven after He was resurrected He gave His Great Commission to His Apostles saying ‘make disciples of all nations’
as long as we accept Him as our Lord and Savior.
The Great Commission
Matthew 28:16 Then the eleven disciples went away into
Galilee, to the mountain which Jesus had appointed for them. 17 When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted. 18 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19
Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." Amen.
@georgiacap9294 can you read. Some disciples doubted him...doesn't seem very convincing especially since they were disciples
Zero evidence Bacon was a freemason, nor is there any evidence he had anything to do with the king James bible.
what's Tony Soprano doing there 😂😂 brother Hamza lecturing a British Italian Godpather xD
You can have a personal relationship with Christ. You can know he is real. King of Kings
Hamza is pure class.
There's nothing classy about being a liar.
There is no evidence for Francis Bacon working on the King James bible.
Here were the scholars involved.
TRANSLATION OVERSEER
Archbishop Richard Bancroft
COMMITTEE OF TWO
Thomas Bilson
Miles Smith
COMMITTEE OF REVISERS
John Bois
Andrew Downes
John Harmar
FIRST WESTMINSTER COMPANY
Lancelot Andrewes (Director)
William Bedwell
Francis Burleigh
Richard Clerke
Geoffrey King
John Leifield
John Overall
Hadrian Saravia
Richard Thompson
Robert Tighe
FIRST CAMBRIDGE COMPANY
Edward Lively (Director)
Roger Andrewes
Andrew Bing
Laurence Chaderton
Francis Dillingham
William Eyre
Thomas Harrison
John Richardson
Robert Spaulding
FIRST OXFORD COMPANY
John Harding (Director)
Richard Brett
Richard Fairclough
Daniel Featley
Thomas Holland
Richard Kilby
John Reynolds
Miles Smith
William Thorne
SECOND CAMBRIDGE COMPANY
John Duport (Leader)
John Bois
William Branthwaite
Andrew Downes
Jeremiah Radcliffe
Robert Ward
Samuel Ward
SECOND OXFORD COMPANY
Thomas Ravis (Leader)
George Abbot
John Aglionby
Richard Edes
John Harmar
Leonard Hutton
James Montegue
John Perrinne
Ralph Ravens
Henry Savile
Giles Thomson
SECOND WESTMINSTER COMPANY
William Barlow (Leader)
William Dakins
Nicholas Felton
Roger Fenton
Ralph Hutchinson
Arthur Lake
Nicholas Love
Michael Rabbett
George Ryves
Thomas Sanderson
John Spencer
TRANSLATOR
Thomas Sparke
PRINTER
Robert Barker
CONTRIBUTORS
John Speed (Genealogies, Map)
Cornelis Boel (Artist/Engraver)
John More (Map)
Renold Elstrack (Engraver)
Hugh Broughton (Genealogies)
He is never mentioned. Also, there is equally no evidence that Bacon was a freemason, nor initiated as such. The Masons themselves claim that the first recorded initiation in the UK was in 1646, years after Bacon died and King Jame's death.
AAP FactCheck debunks this claim as well, and it's rather sad that none of Hamza's fans bothered to even look into this and correct him, but salavate over his nonsense.
I learnt something today.
Fair play to the Christian he was surprised but listened
I am consistently surprised how little Christians know about their own religion...
King James was bisexual, you should be calling it “the Queen James Bible”.
THE ANALYSIS
The claim that Sir Francis Bacon edited a version of the King James Bible has been around for more than a century, however there is no evidence of his involvement in the substantial documentation surrounding the book’s lengthy translation and editing process.
Experts on Sir Francis and the King James Bible dismissed the suggestion that the statesman edited the Bible as baseless.
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was a barrister later recognised for his writing and thought who served under King James I as solicitor general and later attorney general. He was knighted in 1603.
The process of formally translating what came to be known as the King James Bible began in 1604 under the supervision of the Archbishop of Canterbury, with the book intended to supersede several other English translations. These translations included one authorised by King Henry VIII and published in 1539. Until 1536, it had been forbidden to produce a Bible in English.
The King James Bible translation work was done by a committee of 47 scholars and clergymen, a list of whom appears here. Sir Francis is not included in the list.
Ample material has been preserved from the translation process. For example, the version of the Bible printed in 1611 contains 7342 margin notes by the translators, covering such things as obscure passages and the meanings of various biblical words. There is also a lengthy preface by the translators describing their work.
The purported link between Sir Francis and the King James Bible can be traced to the 1905 book The Mystery of Francis Bacon by William T. Smedley, which also includes conjecture that Sir Francis was the true author of Shakespeare’s plays.
However, in the book Smedley admits there is nothing concrete tying Sir Francis to the Bible, using this fact to fuel further speculation: “Is it not strange that there is no mention of any connection of Francis Bacon with this work?” (page 126)
Smedley then conjectures that based on the “homogeneity, breadth and vigour” of the rules governing the translation work they must have been authored by Sir Francis.
He also claims that only Sir Francis could have given the King James Bible its literary flourishes, adding that this was done between 1609 and 1610 when the work was supposedly in the king’s possession (page 128).
The grave of King James clearly shows masonic influence
@WARRIORNORWAY Christians have the Nicene Creed as our belief, can you give me your Aqeedah, creed of faith, what is your belief and where can I find it in the Quran?
He's put the NAIL in the COFFIN
islam = muslim is our only SALVATION ❤️
And this is AFTER the Council of Nicea where they cherry picked through all the interpretations and kept predominately Paul's works over the many others. It baffles me that anyone would see the Bible as a reliable source for anything historic or religious.
۞﷽ اَللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى سَيّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَى آلِ سَيّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍﷺ۞
أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللهُ وَأَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُوْلُ اللهِ
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
The Bible has been re-worded 5,000 times
Yall just love to talk out y’all’s azz.
Oooh wow now that changes things… 😬
The rabbit hole just got a bit deeper
Allahumma barik ❤ may Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta Aala bless you in this life and the next brother aameen
Spoiler alert. All the books were written by men.
Incorrect some were written by women
@@cesarbravo6697 ok, women too.
Sad for you if you can't recognise divine inspiration.
@@GrassPossum People of different cultures can see divine inspiration in the most strange things that leads them to different Gods. All of them belive that just their signals are right and the rest are wrong. Maybe all of you, religious people, are wrong.
Up to 60 men were involved in the development of the King James Bible, this man makes a lot of non points.
Name them please 🙏
Who wrote the New King James Version of the Bible?
Thomas Nelson commissions 130 scholars, pastors, and lay Christians to create the New King James Version (NKJV) of the Bible, aiming to “retain the purity and stylistic beauty” of the original King James produced in 1611. The New Testament is released in 1979, and the entire Bible follows in 1982.
@@Johnnyboyjohn925 a completely different kettle of fish.
The NKJV has plenty of observable errors so we stick with the Bible God used for hundreds of years.
I agree I love the Bible
Ethiopian Bible has 88 books as well as the Greek orthodox having 79... and both not being visited by the Council of Nicea do not contain the same edits.😮
I love how the guys I was debating dropped out Christ is King Glory to the most high. I pray the Father Son and Holy Spirit over this video that no eyes be deceived as Muhammad by Satan or possessed as he was multiple times while claiming Allah was protecting him always. When my God gives protection it does not waver seek and you shall find knock and the door will be open unto you!
May allah the creator of the heaven cure you from all illnesses and give you health and a blessed long life my brother hamza , say Amin brothers .
And us and every Muslim ….. Aameen
Irrelevant, a book can not be valid if witnessed by only one man. Especially when that man today would be the worlds most wanted
Like they say " but theres no smoke without fire" comes to mind.
This is deep 😢😮.
He's an expert on everything - religion alcohol lifestyles prison life The list is endless !!!
Gooooooood point
We are living in the year 2023, its beyond me that people still need religion
The fact is that both books are fantasies.
And without reading any of them you have passed your expert opinion try reading quran for your sake as this life is a test for eternal life.
@@jamalrehman7764 Ah, you know what I’ve been reading.
There is absolutely no record of bacon being part of the interpretations.
Hamza is a very good example of when someone has this big talent and then uses it for the straight path, he is kind of invincible, by the grace of Allah, subhan Allah
Can the words of Allah be changed or not, if they can be changed, then that disprove the Quran who says they cannot; destroying the Quran.
Allah knows how to put these white men in place to destroy the words of Allah.
None of us has any idea what it meant to be a Freemason at that time or what if anything it had to do with writing the Bible.
He knows how to sort things out I believe they never thought us in school that makes me laugh 😂😂😂
heres the big problem... none of those who argue their view of any religion can establish the foundation on which it stands, none can prove the existence of their god. every argument is worthless without proving its source.
Even curiouser when you consider the theory that Bacon wrote the Shakespeare plays, which are rather bawdy at times.
Thank God for the Freemasons!!!! Greatest organization in the world!!!
Outstanding Hamza!
Ibn ‘Umar al Khattab as saying: "Let no one of you say that he has acquired the entire Quran, for how does he know that it is all? Much of the Quran has been lost, thus let him say, ‘I have acquired of it what is available’" (As-Suyuti, Itqan, part 3, page 72).
WOW! I didn't know that!! Good info
Listen carefully to this
Whoever removes a word from the Bible would be removed from the Book of life and whoever adds a word will be cast into the lake of fire. Muslims thread carefully.
We have improved the translation as we discover more manuscripts.
When lies meet lies, one really does wonder.
Hamzaden - this is to you: Professing themselves to be wise, they become fools,
Slam dunk brother ma sha allah may the almighty increase your knowledge more IA
Why even deal with the Bible and ancient fairy tales at all?
*Knucklehead !* King James did not revise the Bible... Your Khalif
Uthman revised the Quran and had the variant Qurans burned... Get your
facts straight stop lying to sincere Muslims
Knowledge is power but the truth is powerful...
Allahuma barik hamza . Allah made u for this job
I knew that and there is much more evidence. It is important Christian’s look into this stuff. I am happy he brought it out …
There is NO evidence Bacon had anything to do with the KJV translation. This guys is a liar.
@@rlhicks1
The Shakespearean talk “thou, art, shalt …” Sir Francis Bacon is known for this.
This man is NOT a qualified historian. He has no references, no PhD. His "yes" assertions mean nothing.
Sahih Bukhari
Narrated Aisha: The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj.
How did you add pic?
@@sulaimanansari5075he didn't. it's an emote you can use as a member of the channel
That's a pretty good satanic lie that was Satan's promise to destroy God's creation and this man's doing a very good job of it
Assalamualaikum- Is the full episode of this conversation up yet?
looks like Tony Soprano lol 😆
At this point I'd rather be an athiest.
There is one and only god.