Largest & Biggest Strategic Bombers in the World (2020) | Active Bombers Size Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 мар 2020
  • **Largest & Biggest Strategic Bombers in the World (2020) | Active Bombers Size Comparison **
    ► More Military videos on ‘THE BUZZ’: • 10 Most Powerful Howit...
    🏆 Video Information:
     A bomber is a combat aircraft designed to attack ground and naval targets by dropping air-to-ground weaponry (such as bombs), launching torpedoes, or deploying air-launched cruise missiles. .
     There are two major classifications of bomber, strategic, and tactical. Strategic bombing is done by heavy bombers primarily designed for long-range bombing missions against strategic targets to diminish the enemy's ability to wage war by limiting access to resources through crippling infrastructure or reducing industrial output. Whilst tactical bombing is aimed at countering enemy military activity and in supporting offensive operations, and is typically assigned to smaller aircraft operating at shorter ranges, typically near the troops on the ground or against enemy shipping.
     In this video, we present you the list the size comparison of active strategic bombers in the world today.
    Enjoy watching. Cheers!
    🔝 Sources & Credits:-
    military.wikia.org/wiki/
    www.militaryfactory.com/
    www.army-technology.com/weapons/
    www.military-today.com/
    machinesforwar.blogspot.com/20...
    basilzolotov.com/side-views/tu...
    basilzolotov.com/side-views/tu...
    FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
    * Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 258

  • @dataman6744
    @dataman6744 4 года назад +196

    It's called White swan by the Russian Airforce. NATO designation is Black jack.

    • @nickkorkodylas5005
      @nickkorkodylas5005 3 года назад +17

      The US takes pride in being colorblind. They even voted a Kenyan into presidency.

    • @kptlt.phillipthomsen5973
      @kptlt.phillipthomsen5973 3 года назад +22

      @@nickkorkodylas5005 Nice racism bruh

    • @Koyomix86
      @Koyomix86 3 года назад +13

      @@nickkorkodylas5005 it’s actually because NATO has a certain way of naming things, for bombers it always starts with a B like the bear or in this case the blackjack, fighters start with a f, like the flanker and fulcrum. This is to keep things consistent so even if you don’t know the name if someone says bear you know it’s a bomber and if someone says flanker you know it’s a fighter.

    • @nickkorkodylas5005
      @nickkorkodylas5005 3 года назад +16

      @@Koyomix86 Guess it explains why *B* arrack was so hellbent to bombing people.

    • @mitahenare8901
      @mitahenare8901 2 года назад +5

      @@nickkorkodylas5005 Stop crying man!

  • @riccardosmirnov5063
    @riccardosmirnov5063 3 года назад +24

    Totally different bombers. In Russia, the real heavy bomber still is the Tu-22M3 Backfire, today Tu-22M3M. The Tu-95MS and MSM are cruise missile carriers (actually a Tu142MK modified for long range aviation). The Tu160 is a mach2 strategic nuclear bomber (today probably with conventional capability too).

  • @ramirosuarez2321
    @ramirosuarez2321 4 года назад +5

    Muy ilustrativos, claros, precisos tus videos muy agradecido contigo y tus colaboradores, tremendo equipo,. Excelete

  • @manishbhat2466
    @manishbhat2466 4 года назад +84

    Tu 160 the beautiful bird the LETHAL bird.

  • @listerdave1240
    @listerdave1240 3 года назад +13

    I find it odd how seen alone in the air the Bear looks enormous while the Lancer looks like the size of a fighter jet but in reality they are both about the same size.

  • @meand6ix9inedieinprisionpo87
    @meand6ix9inedieinprisionpo87 4 года назад +4

    Good video from 🇮🇹

  • @subhrohasdakshuvro481
    @subhrohasdakshuvro481 3 года назад +10

    Tupulev 160...i like

  • @shubhamkumar_z
    @shubhamkumar_z 4 года назад +6

    Make a video on top 10 towed howitzer

  • @rajmishra6221
    @rajmishra6221 4 года назад +3

    Nice❤

  • @George.Coleman
    @George.Coleman Год назад +6

    Imagine identifying a fleet of Tu-160s flying overhead. Who would you even call?

  • @videomotivationymas5540
    @videomotivationymas5540 3 года назад +1

    Awesome

  • @SoydeCubaCompay
    @SoydeCubaCompay Год назад +2

    Tupolev Tu-160🥂🥂

  • @adron0997
    @adron0997 2 года назад +2

    Tu 160 M2

  • @carinhall4508
    @carinhall4508 4 года назад +75

    The White Swan has no equal

    • @Electrono7036
      @Electrono7036 3 года назад +10

      @Frank The Tank Russia has the largest active bomber aircrafts in the world

    • @TN_Whiskey
      @TN_Whiskey 3 года назад +1

      @ADRIEN DOUCET B1Bs will not be sent in unless air superior is achieved and the b2 is more affect then you think

    • @batuhan8604
      @batuhan8604 3 года назад

      A b1 knockoff

    • @AnIndianPatriot
      @AnIndianPatriot 3 года назад +5

      @@batuhan8604 both have different roles, Tu 160 was built for Strategic Nuclear Deliverance while B 1b is a close range air support. If you really wanna compare it with something, then you have Tu 22 which was also built before B 1b.

    • @richwood2741
      @richwood2741 3 года назад +2

      @ADRIEN DOUCET not sure how you think a stealth bomber is less effective. In order to even know these planes are over your airspace you need to see one first as the radar cross section is so small that it is drowned out by large amounts of bugs. Can it hold the most bonbs/missiles? No. By the time you know it is above you it has already dropped its payload and is moving away. Look at what the iraqis did to try and defend against them. They shot anti aircraft guns into the air at random which did them no good.

  • @jamesorsby7553
    @jamesorsby7553 Год назад +6

    I wouldn't have never, ever guessed that the B-1 actually weighs more than a B-52...go figure.

  • @Troggie42
    @Troggie42 3 года назад +27

    Kinda wild that the B2 is the smallest but it's still #3 in wingspan
    Such a wild ass plane

    • @nyag1337
      @nyag1337 2 года назад +2

      Weird how this channel thinks the word biggest means longest.... length x width x height

    • @timothyimmanuel570
      @timothyimmanuel570 2 года назад +1

      Dude its litteraly called a flying wing

    • @dewboy910
      @dewboy910 2 года назад +1

      Probably why it's called the flying wing. lol.

    • @ClaudeMagicbox
      @ClaudeMagicbox 2 года назад +1

      It's also pretty stupid operatively.
      It costs 2 billion dollars each, with which China and Russia build a dozen or more of their strategic bombers, and needs over 60 ground personnel to operate and maintain each one.
      It's a fancy ass thing that makes no sense anymore after the strong developments of 8K optometric array detection systems which make old "stealth" technology completely useless.
      In terms of performance it's equivalent to the TU-95 "Bear" but consumes 3 times as much fuel and needs 4 times more personnel to run it.

    • @Jake-rs9nq
      @Jake-rs9nq 2 года назад +2

      @@ClaudeMagicbox Let's be honest, all of the bombers on this list, aside from *maybe* the B-1 and B-2, would be shot down instantly if they tried to attack a powerful nation. The US wanted to develop a bomber that could fly into Eastern Europe and survive.

  • @sihebat1
    @sihebat1 4 года назад +4

    That weight is including the amunition load?

  • @govindsinghrawat1338
    @govindsinghrawat1338 4 года назад +18

    Please buzz make video on top ten towed artillery

    • @berndlinnecke5738
      @berndlinnecke5738 2 месяца назад

      Meinst du von Pferden gezogen, oder mit gezogenen Rohren?

  • @lac9586
    @lac9586 2 года назад +2

    TU 160 White Swan

  • @Ksehsatoo
    @Ksehsatoo Год назад

    Damn the B2 is heavy

  • @mikaelbiilmann6826
    @mikaelbiilmann6826 Год назад

    Is that empty weight or max take-off weight?

  • @HakujinTrue
    @HakujinTrue 3 года назад +2

    Mirrored swan)

  • @chonomercy
    @chonomercy 3 года назад +2

    Load capacity would help

  • @njnikusha
    @njnikusha 2 года назад +1

    Something about B2 . look is just everything

  • @StayHealthy363
    @StayHealthy363 2 года назад

    You did not mention their playload capacity. How to compare??

  • @user-sg9fj2ld4k
    @user-sg9fj2ld4k 3 года назад +5

    Правильнее наверное указывать не вес пустого самолёта а вес нормальной или максимальной взлетной массы. Там у многих он в два три раза больше веса пустого

  • @g1native
    @g1native 2 года назад +3

    B 52 should be at number ☝️!. . It's proven itself time and time again!👍

  • @ronaldcharan2705
    @ronaldcharan2705 3 года назад +5

    Even though it's not in service , the B-36 was the largest ever. Makes these planes look mid-sized.

    • @tomaspolizzi3321
      @tomaspolizzi3321 3 года назад

      Nah 🖕🏻🤣🖕🏻

    • @jimallen9859
      @jimallen9859 2 года назад +1

      Nope, Tu-160 is. Holds the world record for it.

    • @Nick-jl2yp
      @Nick-jl2yp 2 года назад +1

      @@jimallen9859 B52 Wing span is 185 FT B36 Wingspan is 230 FT the TU-160 is 183 FT

  • @juicylemons6843
    @juicylemons6843 4 года назад +5

    B52 is old but still kickin.

  • @lemmingsfly
    @lemmingsfly 8 месяцев назад

    Putting the B-2 behind the H-6 seems silly considering the B-2 is almost twice as heavy and way wider. Not to mention it can carry better weapons farther, faster, and can lift over twice as much weight then that Chinese copy of an old Soviet bomber.

    • @doorkapatrool536
      @doorkapatrool536 6 месяцев назад

      Это сравнение длинны

  • @patrickorjaliza9174
    @patrickorjaliza9174 2 года назад +1

    Do retired bombers comparison

  • @sebastiansethd.lastimosa6610
    @sebastiansethd.lastimosa6610 3 года назад +2

    looking at a b2 bomber sideways look wierd

  • @Lexcru24
    @Lexcru24 3 года назад +2

    India also have tu 142 bomber 😊😊

  • @buttert5091
    @buttert5091 3 года назад +1

    Compare their range

  • @SyntaxError-nz4kg
    @SyntaxError-nz4kg 2 года назад

    Tu95 is the most beautiful aircraft in my opinion. As far as bombers are concerned at least, f14 is the best looking fighter jet

  • @gradientascent4218
    @gradientascent4218 3 месяца назад

    B-52 was never called Stratofortress, it's was B-25.

  • @HeinrichGermany1
    @HeinrichGermany1 2 месяца назад

    What did you mean? The longest, the heaviest, the widest wingspan, or what. This makes your ranking very different.

  • @dubaitamilwaalapranksfunny9713

    The list India will come as soon 💪

  • @user-ii2jo4nh4j
    @user-ii2jo4nh4j 3 года назад

    3:13 The NATO designation is Blackjack not White Swan

  • @kenflagler635
    @kenflagler635 2 года назад +2

    As Bombers go, I think the B-1 is the sexiest. Killer plane.

  • @kevinferrin5695
    @kevinferrin5695 2 года назад

    Bomb load is an important figure that was left out.

  • @ivansouza646
    @ivansouza646 2 месяца назад +1

    Tupolev tu 160 .

  • @sniper7303
    @sniper7303 Год назад

    we do the most minimal amount of trolling

  • @kimkotanaku7490
    @kimkotanaku7490 Год назад

    Tokyo C7 Flying Saucer with Plasma Sun Gun 8 of Them, Speed of 7000 Time Speed of Light ,300 Crew Members

  • @runtime1976
    @runtime1976 2 года назад

    This girl mirrored the images!!! YAY!!!

  • @coolsquad7428
    @coolsquad7428 2 года назад +1

    The biggest bomber in history is the b36 peace maker which makes the b52 looks small

    • @tupolev.designs
      @tupolev.designs Год назад

      No doubt but it’s not operational, these still are

    • @doorkapatrool536
      @doorkapatrool536 6 месяцев назад

      Он не был стратегическим

  • @paulzero25
    @paulzero25 3 года назад +2

    Строго говоря:
    Ту-95 и Ту-160 - ракетоносцы. Бомбить их учили значительно позже и в качестве расширения номенклатуры применяемого вооружения, которая не является главной целью их применения. А Ту - 22 не был стратегическим. Это ракетоносец оперативно-тактического назначения. Так что из представителей советской школы бомбардировщиком можно назвать разве что H-6, который является развитием Ту-16.

    • @harkko5683
      @harkko5683 2 года назад

      Не развитие, а лицензионная сборка с последующей модернизацией по части электронной начинки.

    • @doorkapatrool536
      @doorkapatrool536 6 месяцев назад

      Ту-22 изначально был стратегическим, но лишился функции дощаправки в воздухе согласно договору о сокращении наступательного вооружения и перестал им быть

    • @paulzero25
      @paulzero25 6 месяцев назад

      @@doorkapatrool536 от того, что у комплекса есть или нет штанги, или дальность действия не определяет назначения. Стратегические бомбардировщики решаю стратегические задачи, так же как и номенклатура вооружения, прикрученная к нему. Но, если в 160 загрузить в бомбоотсеки по завязку и отправить бомбить передовую, он будет решать тактическую задачу, при этом не перестанет быть стратегическим ракетоносцем. Не путайте теплое с мягким. Главная задача 22 - уничтожение АУГ, а это оперативно-тактическая задача.

  • @PpAirO5
    @PpAirO5 2 года назад +1

    B-1 Lancer 👍

  • @WeSRT4
    @WeSRT4 Год назад

    All of them are dinosaurs except for the B2.

  • @secretsaturday2089
    @secretsaturday2089 4 года назад +6

    please,I wanna ♥

  • @ananya-rb1un
    @ananya-rb1un 4 года назад +23

    Russia is weapons capital in europe
    🇷🇺❤️🇮🇳❤️🇷🇺❤️🇮🇳❤️🇷🇺❤️🇮🇳

    • @sir.justain4403
      @sir.justain4403 3 года назад

      WTH is this comment?! LoL
      why the Indian flag

    • @ananya-rb1un
      @ananya-rb1un 3 года назад +5

      @@sir.justain4403 india russia are friends of all time 🇮🇳💖🇷🇺

    • @jitu5923
      @jitu5923 3 года назад +1

      @@sir.justain4403 can we friend

    • @basedguy___
      @basedguy___ 3 года назад +3

      Lol but america is no.1 powerful country

    • @ananya-rb1un
      @ananya-rb1un 3 года назад

      @@basedguy___ Yes. We are friends
      🚩💅🕉️🇮🇳👩💖🧔🇺🇲💪🚩

  • @user-yz7bf4jo4b
    @user-yz7bf4jo4b 4 года назад +2

    1

  • @Gostwriterindisguise
    @Gostwriterindisguise Год назад

    Largest and biggest?

  • @suyashgupta9016
    @suyashgupta9016 4 года назад +7

    Make a video on indian army😘😘

  • @ronalmere
    @ronalmere 4 года назад +1

    Hmmm.... is this right? A B52 is empty 83.250 kg. But starting weight is 120.000 kg. Maximum weight is 220.000 kg. It would be nice to get the complete information from Wikipedia.

    • @thebuzz4108
      @thebuzz4108  4 года назад

      I gave the empty weight of that aircraft. I didn't mention about maximum take off weight and loaded weight.

    • @ronalmere
      @ronalmere 4 года назад +3

      @@thebuzz4108 It is just a very interesting comparison. I checked several bombers. Big differences in price and payload. Thanks for sharing.

  • @whitestaralliance7190
    @whitestaralliance7190 3 года назад +6

    The XB-70 is the largest bomber over all

  • @himangshubaruah1140
    @himangshubaruah1140 2 года назад +1

    Does Indian Air force used tu 22 m? If not, then why you put Indian air force ignisia n flag on it?

    • @user-FEFe
      @user-FEFe 14 дней назад

      Yes, u saw that too 😂. Very strange..

  • @singarajancarter1042
    @singarajancarter1042 2 года назад

    Cost BI vs TU22

  • @josephgibbons1631
    @josephgibbons1631 2 года назад +2

    They should have been rated by payload.

    • @tonibrazo4717
      @tonibrazo4717 Год назад

      In terms of payload, the Tu-160 is also in the first place

  • @tomaspolizzi3321
    @tomaspolizzi3321 3 года назад +3

    TUPOLEV TU-160. 😍😍😍

  • @wisenber
    @wisenber 2 года назад

    The video should be "longest bombers". The B2 is larger by weight than 5 and 6.

  • @kilobyte8321
    @kilobyte8321 2 года назад

    Is this an American channel why are metric units listed first?

  • @jetstreamchad4712
    @jetstreamchad4712 3 года назад

    The TU series is like move the fuck over

  • @danihutama4113
    @danihutama4113 2 года назад +1

    TU-22M Atau TU-95

  • @Jermo7899
    @Jermo7899 Год назад

    B2 at 7. You have got to be joking

  • @user-gx1kh6sf8v
    @user-gx1kh6sf8v 3 года назад

    Ту-160 Миг-31 the best

  • @SPEARHEADGLOBAL
    @SPEARHEADGLOBAL 3 года назад

    H6 is just a medium bomber

  • @elimrmartian
    @elimrmartian 2 года назад +3

    Mother Russia 🇷🇺 👏🏼

  • @natasaradenkov2352
    @natasaradenkov2352 2 года назад

    Where is the best and bigest and fastest TU 160m ?

  • @mackjsm7105
    @mackjsm7105 2 года назад

    you dont even list the range and how much it can carry.. kind of the most important thing..

  • @zhangbaweiba9033
    @zhangbaweiba9033 4 года назад +29

    Russia always number 1 in military weapons 🤒🤒

    • @DuggzValentine
      @DuggzValentine 3 года назад +1

      Well they did give PepsiCo a bunch of nuclear subs and aircraft carriers for a bunch of pepsi

    • @user-ii2jo4nh4j
      @user-ii2jo4nh4j 3 года назад +1

      @@DuggzValentine that is what’s called a pro gamer move

    • @anonymouse6129
      @anonymouse6129 3 года назад +1

      Russia isnt always the number 1 lol russia is just number 1 at biggest country in the world

  • @ahmad000almahdi
    @ahmad000almahdi 2 года назад +1

    « إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ ۚ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا »

  • @MrAnonymous3333
    @MrAnonymous3333 4 года назад +9

    Its crazy B-52 is still operational & best in the world after all these decades

    • @awesomefacepalm
      @awesomefacepalm 4 года назад +1

      Ol' reliable

    • @nottoday3817
      @nottoday3817 4 года назад +9

      Best in the world? Based on? not saying it's not an excellent platform, but I think 'best' would be quite an overstatement without proper backing.

    • @GangsarDwi
      @GangsarDwi 4 года назад +1

      Ho many shoot down in Vietnam ? 😅

    • @user-gd2pb3mb6h
      @user-gd2pb3mb6h 4 года назад +4

      @@GangsarDwi 52 b52s were killed . Some of them by mig-21 fighters, some by soviet groud to air missiles s-75

    • @callespringer9718
      @callespringer9718 4 года назад

      Together with the Tu-95/142, the B-52 is a 1950's workhorse that just never seem to actually get obsolete. Sure, they need weapons and electronic upgrades every now and then, but their basic performance (range, payload) has been proven, and not surpassed since, and they've outlived every other bomber from that era (not counting the Chinese Tu-16's, whatever they're called).

  • @ahmsdenielp.herrera7190
    @ahmsdenielp.herrera7190 2 года назад +1

    Tu-95😩😩😩

  • @Catsrule1132
    @Catsrule1132 Год назад

    B2 is the smallest bomber ever created.... from the eyes of radar

  • @ilmol3829
    @ilmol3829 4 года назад +1

    Tu-22 is not a strategic bomber, he is a tactician after the IRNFT agreement.

  • @waraghud
    @waraghud 4 года назад

    3rd heart me

  • @damiangonzalezlopez829
    @damiangonzalezlopez829 3 года назад +2

    Number 0:
    USA B-36D Peacemaker

    • @georgeantabi6025
      @georgeantabi6025 3 года назад +1

      This is actually my all time favourite bomber

  • @punjin3702
    @punjin3702 4 года назад +1

    爆撃機の全長比べて何の意味があるんだ?重要なのは積載量と航続距離だろ

  • @iuliansin7657
    @iuliansin7657 Год назад

    0.5 have the Romanian Flag,so,does Romania have Tu,anyhow?

  • @mofleh177
    @mofleh177 2 месяца назад

    You could've ranked these bombers by their load capacity, You chose to rank them by their length which is totally meaningless!

  • @praveenkaushik655
    @praveenkaushik655 2 года назад +1

    What ? See the photo of tu 22m bomber and see it carefully on its tail , there was indian flag colour in its tail ????

  • @MiroslavHundak
    @MiroslavHundak 3 года назад +1

    What the heck. I had no idea Tu-160 was that large. I thought that because it was based on B-1 that it was also similar in size.

    • @jimallen9859
      @jimallen9859 2 года назад +2

      Tu-160 isn't based on B-1. It's the other way round. Tu-160 is a design from the 1950's.

    • @MiroslavHundak
      @MiroslavHundak 2 года назад

      @@jimallen9859 You're right. My bad.

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 10 месяцев назад

    Realy I like this powerful bombardiers

  • @HDBoyWonder
    @HDBoyWonder 2 года назад

    I’m no expert, but I’d say this “Buzz” logo infringes the copyright of McClatchy Newspapers’ Sacramento, Fresno and Modesto Bee newspapers and online news outlets. This ‘Bee’ drawing clearly is a copy in spirit of the real “Bee” newspaper logos, which originally were created by for McClatchy by Walt Disney. Interesting report though.

  • @slavisastankovic4599
    @slavisastankovic4599 4 года назад +2

    That b-2spirit isn't low visible, ask Serbs.

    • @TN_Whiskey
      @TN_Whiskey 3 года назад +6

      wrong plane you are thinking of the F-117A the B-2 Spirit has far better track record

  • @SonuKumar-iw5fr
    @SonuKumar-iw5fr Год назад

    India usa sa b1lancer bombar karana aur rassia sa tu160 black jack bombar dil kara jai hind jai bharat banda matram

  • @mitchelljohnleslie1696
    @mitchelljohnleslie1696 3 года назад +1

    B-52 Bomber
    B-1 Bomber
    B-2 Bomber
    Are My Favorite
    GOD BLESS AMERICA 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @user-oc9gs5lc3t
      @user-oc9gs5lc3t 3 года назад +1

      Авангард благословит..

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 10 месяцев назад +1

    '
    look at number 06...
    china xian H-6 was made from ussr russia...
    Xian H-6 - (Conventional Bomber) Original, conventional bomber; Tupolev Tu-16 produced under license in China, first flew in 1959. A prototype conducted China's first aerial nuclear weapon test at Lop Nor on 14 May 1965...
    The Tupolev Tu-16 (NATO reporting name: Badger) is a twin-engined jet strategic heavy bomber used by the Soviet Union. It has been flown for almost 70 years...
    see that tu-16 and xian h-6 are same airplanes bombers...
    pooooor both countrys china=ussr russia

  • @richwood2741
    @richwood2741 3 года назад +3

    Just because it is the largest does not mean it carries the most ordnance. The b1 b has a larger payload than the largest bomber. The only thing that the russian bomber has that is better than the b1 b is it faster and has a slightly larger range. The russian bomber due to its empty weight has a much reduced payload capacity. Funny that people compare all the bombers and see who would win but in truth none of them would ever have reason to go head to head. Their targets are never in the air. Their missions involve dropping bombs or large missiles on targets that are at ground/sea level. Air to air combat is a no go for all of them.

    • @georgeantabi6025
      @georgeantabi6025 3 года назад

      This m8 is spittin' some facts here

    • @user-ii2jo4nh4j
      @user-ii2jo4nh4j 3 года назад

      And also they are from completely different countries, who designed and built them with completely different purposes in mind.

    • @Hollivet
      @Hollivet 3 года назад +2

      b1b carries 34 tons, tu-160 45 tons bombs, use google )

    • @bayan5694
      @bayan5694 3 года назад

      this was about the Size comparisons, not ordnances

  • @MrVanalen
    @MrVanalen 3 года назад +2

    😂😂Russian baby bear

  • @robertcetl7358
    @robertcetl7358 3 года назад

    the way she pronounces the word 'strategic' bothers me

  • @mehditurki5480
    @mehditurki5480 3 года назад

    le mirage 2000 👍🏼🇨🇵

  • @user-db8by1ti8h
    @user-db8by1ti8h 3 года назад

    白天鹅yyds

  • @unfurling3129
    @unfurling3129 3 года назад +9

    Horrendous narration. Perfect for young children and mental cripples.

    • @stefanw3953
      @stefanw3953 3 года назад +1

      The narration pisses me off too lol

    • @ExWEIMan
      @ExWEIMan 3 года назад

      Definitely a video where a robo voice would have been a better choice for narration. A potato could have done a better job.

  • @albertdubrovsky9545
    @albertdubrovsky9545 4 года назад +12

    Russia is at number 1 as always...

    • @olliepainter2155
      @olliepainter2155 4 года назад

      Not always but its great.

    • @TN_Whiskey
      @TN_Whiskey 3 года назад +2

      Not really this list is just by weight of them being empty. The Tu-22 Blinder is actually retired and ths Tu-95 Bear can only carry 33,000 lbs of ordnance less then all there of the U.S. bombers and the Tu-160 White Swan carriers 96,208 lbs of ordnance which is only more then the B-52 Stratofortress and B-2 Spirit the B-1B Lancer carries 125,000 lbs of ordnance plus all three of the U.S. bombers have a wider variety of armament compared to the two chooses on the Tu-160 White Swan and four chooses of the Tu-95 Bear

    • @jimallen9859
      @jimallen9859 2 года назад

      @@TN_Whiskey
      No, Tu-160 is the largest capacity.
      Search it. Holds the world record

    • @TN_Whiskey
      @TN_Whiskey 2 года назад

      @@jimallen9859 nope the lancer can carry 50,000lbs on its 6 external hard points and 75,000lbs in it's 3 internal bomb bays add it up and you 125,000lbs

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 2 года назад

    '
    come on americans companys musts makes many more better power arms weapons to destroy all ussr russia arms weapons down

  • @theverminator8048
    @theverminator8048 3 года назад

    Is it a kid or a woman as a narrator?

  • @kimkotanaku7490
    @kimkotanaku7490 Год назад

    Flying Saucer Vril 9 Build 1945 By Maria Orsic Could Destroy Them all In 5 Minutes by Use Her Worm Hole Machine Make them in to 0.5% Matter Vril 250 Build July 2022 by Maria Orsic On Alpha Centauri B Third Planet From the SUN

  • @uttamthapa2579
    @uttamthapa2579 Год назад

    In space..... russia is the first 😁😁 not america !! 😄😄😄