The History of the Turkic Languages
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 дек 2020
- Check out Project Orochi at: projectorochi.com/?ref=bFcDmP...
Use the code DRAGONHISTORIAN at checkout to get 5% OFF
Follow Project Orochi for more content and updates!
/ projectorochi
The Turkic languages comprise a major language family spoken widely across Eurasia. Originating from western Mongolia, Turkic migrations have brought these languages further west over the millennia.
Turkey, located at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, is now home to the most Turkic speakers. These languages follow a subject-object verb sentence structure and feature vowel harmony and agglutination.
This video presents the history and evolution of the Turkic languages from 500 BCE to the present.
Disclaimer: all dates are approximations, and there are many hypotheses regarding the development and classification of these languages that are not represented in this video.
Music from purple-planet.com
A few things that I missed in the video:
1. Common Turkic should have spread to Lake Baikal a few centuries earlier than shown.
2. Azerbaijani may have been spoken in Iran during the Qajar dynasty (1785-1925).
3. Kipchak was spoken in Egypt from the 13th to the 16th centuries, which I missed.
4. Modern Turkish should be striped into southeastern Turkey and parts of northern Iraq and Syria.
I love Turkic Languages especially Sakha
Hi, Mr. Dragon Historian,
I am 10 1/2 years old and I love your history videos. My name is Kevin and I am Korean-American. Your channel says your name is Sean Kim so I am guessing that you are Korean too like me lol.
I just want to say thank you sooooo much for these videos. I have always wanted to know more about my Korean culture and history but most history taught in the USA are about Western countries or the US instead of Korea or nearby countries like China. So, I am very grateful that you make all these videos.
I hope that you don't mind me asking but, is this your job? I mean, do you get paid by RUclips or are you a volunteer? Just curious. Are you a history teacher or plan to become a professor in Asian history?
I want to be a writer about different cultures around the world like a travel writer but I am not sure if there are many jobs out there so I will probably go to graduate school after college to get a normal day job in business and just write on the side as a hobby.
Anyway, thank you so much for all your videos, Mr. Kim.
Austroasiatic languages next?
Safavids spoke Azerbaijani
Azerbaijani wasn't even official language in Iran. Despite the kings being Azeri. the people just speak their languages
Why is the music arabic sounding even though the subject matter is Turkic languages. It should've been Turkic music. It's not hard to find either. Just type in turkic music or even mongolian music would've been fine 🤦♂️
Those westerners especially americans pretty liberally put stereotypical chinese music in *serious documentaries* about japan or vietnam so i can't expect more really...
That's the first thing caught my attention. I was like, "Hey, that music is Arabic, not Turkic."
because nowadays lots of west "Turkish" people are the descendants of Indo-European. believing Arabic religion. has genetically and culturally nothing to do with Turk except speaking Turkic languages. they are humiliating their ancestors by calling themselves Turks.
Map is wrong
It doesn't sound like arabic music though
Steppes between Crimea and Caspian sea were mainly Turkic-speaking until XVIII century
*Until Khazars migrated to Europe.
Russia ate the Turks there
@@mayda2898 but now rUsSia can ate little UKRAINE and were soon TURKS will ate all of estarn europe the middle east and north africa 🖕
Then became Ukrainian @@mayda2898
Indoeuropean corded ware👱🏼♂️👩🏼🦰➡️sintashta👱🏼♂️👩🏼🦰➡️andronovo👱🏼♂️👩🏼🦰➡️scyhtian👱🏼♂️👩🏻(turkwomen)
Selam olsun Türk dünyasına. Çok güzel video.
Doğru değil.Altinadamdaki ön turkce hatta baya tirkce yazı 2500 yaşında
@@avukatrecep8016 Evet geç başlatmış baya
@@suleimanthemagnificent1494 oyş
@@papazataklaattiranimam 🐰
Geç başlatmamış daha öncesi bilinmiyor, ama videoda hatalar var, kuzey suriye ve ırak çizgi çizgi olmalı ve ayrıca mısır sadece çizgi değil mısırda kıpçak göçü var.
even for a nomad, we travelled too much. thanks for your effort.
The nomadic extremists of nomads lol
mongols: Amateurs
@@unanec Mongols were nomads too. And they conquered so much but they didn't live where they conquered.
@@alkarisi2585 that's what i meant
you should go back to turkmenistan and uyghuristan , reclaim your homeland
Mongol:I CAME
Turkic Languages:We don't care we still exist LOL
English-Black - Japanese-Kuroi, Korean-Komon, Mongolian-Khar, Turkish-Kara
Mongolia is not Turk
@@cultureofturk711
Baekje Kumu
Goguryeo Kumur
@@russiaandsouthkoreafriends8253 Mongolia is Altaic. you are again read my post. i not said Mongolians Turks.
@@cultureofturk711 and Komon (x)
Kumun.Kuun.Kumon.Kaman (o)
Great work! You managed to present all the languages. Very interesting the hypothesis about the origin and route of the oghuric branch
Anatolia Turks just turkified greeks
@@jxelus1274 Sinicized Manchurian?You
Thank you! I'm personally not sure about the Oghur history shown in this video myself. This version would only be valid if the Xiongnu were really Oghur speakers, which has yet to be proven.
@@TheDragonHistorian
Prof. Dr. Nicola Di Cosmo in: The Turks: Early ages, Part 4. Huns (Xiongnu): The Origin and Rise of the Xiongnu Empire, Y. T., 2002, pp.217-227, University of Michigan, ISBN 9756782552, 9789756782552
"There is not much doubt among historians about the Turkish nature of the Great Hun Empire, which ruled between 318 B.C. and 216 A.D., as well as that of its predecessor proto-Huns, whose presence was confirmed by Chinese sources. The Great Hun Empire, the Western Hun Empire and especially the European Huns were examined comprehensively by Western historians."
@@papazataklaattiranimam lets wait for more proofs man
I loved the detail and efford you put into this! Thank you.
This is beautiful, great work dude, much love from Turkey!
Turkey değil Türkiye
Excellent work!
There's a small mistake - Dolgan didn't really appear in the end the 14th century. It's a new language, that was formed in the 19-20th century. And as a Sakha speaker I'd call it a dialect of Sakha, rather than a separate language.
You're Siberian?
@@QuillOfTheIsles2199 yes
@@SaydamNomad so cool
Do u speak Dolgan i can Speak Turkish Azeri and a bit Turkmen and Kazakh
У Саха есть монгольские корни от Хори
Safavid and Afsharid turkic speakers
Not only speakers they are Turkic and Qajars too.
Safavids are Qizilbash Turks and descentands of Akkoyunlu state.
Afsharids are from the Afshar tribe of the Oghuz Turks.
Qajars are from the Bayat tribe of the Oghuz Turks.
Afsharlar Turkmen,Safavilar Azerbaijani
Afsharid✌🏻
Mughals are Öz Bekliyorum (Oghuz Beg)
@@suleimanthemagnificent1494 Safavids were Kurds, learn basic history 👇
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safavid_dynasty
YES! FINALLY! THANK YOU!
Kazakhstan 🇰🇿 Kyrgyzstan 🇰🇬 Turkmenistan 🇹🇲 Azerbaijan 🇦🇿 Turkiye 🇹🇷 Uzbekistan 🇺🇿 Cyprys 🇨🇾 Tatarstan Kyrym Tatar Bashkortostan Dagestan Adygeiya Sakha Chavash EN Kabardi-BALKAR Buryatia Kalmykiya Shigis Turkistan Chechnya Kabordin-Balkaria Yamalo-Nenec Udmurtia Tek qana ALGA!
Salom from Uzbekistan
We're are the CRIMEAN TATARS ?(
Cyprus is Greek. Adygeiya is Northwestern Caucasian. Buryatia and Kalmykia are Mongloic. Chechnya is North Caucasian. Yamalo-Nenets and Udmurt are Uralic
@@hilmust6278 Dagestan is persian
@@Uran_KH-98 half of Dagestan is Persian, and the other half is Turkic
Eastern Thrace should be painted, not hatched. I living at there and I have never seen anyone who doesn’t speak Turkish except some Pomaks.
Also Eastern Turkey should be hatched. I know there are too many Kurdish speakers but Turkish speakers aren’t so low. There are many Turks too, not everyone is Kurdish in there.
The hatch marks mean the speakers are socially lower than the rulers regardless of the number of speakers. If Eastern Thrace has Turkish speaking RULERS, then you're right. However, if they're, no matter how they are dominant in number, socially more for commoners, then hatch marks are proper.
@@Neky_Hina Every mayors and governors are speaking Turkish.
are guys muslim or christians?
@@muslimproudtobe 97% of Turks are Muslim (Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uzbek, Tatar, Turkmen, Azerbaijani, Uyghur, Turkish, Karachay, Nogay, Qumuq)
@@nevsehri4819 sen cidden oranın o kadar büyük olduğuna inanıyor musun?
Very nice, well done!
Nice video, very busy, I had to look at it again to see everything! And it was easy to see!
Kudos on your work!
Wow :0 Fascinating language family
This music is not Turkic!
music cant be turkic, there are many nations/tribes that speak turkic, with own different folk music
thanks Bro i love it
Amazing!
댸미있습꾸마~
🇰🇿 Bu videosı öte kızık, keremet! Jaksı jumıs
Greetings from Oghuz Ottoman Turks.
These letters are nice👍
@@vehbisabanc7843 ne dedin orda reis
Oghuz Turks🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲❤️Kıpchak Turks🇰🇿❤️Kırygız Turks🇰🇬❤️Timurid Turks🇺🇿❤️Hun Turks🇭🇺❤️Brother🇵🇰
@@seljuksempire7712 Turcia İmperium
Nice!.
and you missed salar(oghuz people) who located in gansu province and practice sunni
Yes Sala Zu is very close to Azerbaycanı Turkish and Türkmen oghuz language
Good job pretty accurate
I can clearly see the quality and work in this video. Also musics were chosen well. Tbh you are the best videomapper about languages
The music sounds very middle eastern. It could be something like “Toquz Oyuz” instead
Omg :0 What an expand 😍
olum beni takip ediyosun :D ben sana tanışalım dedim.
Argu turk lenguage(xalaç khalaj halaç kholaç kholg galaç khalaj center iran h ) all= hall* ev=hev* yollar=yollrga* olsan=olta* guz=kozing yox yok=yug yohg agaç=hagaç ay=hay doşan=toşgan gurt=bury siçan=siçgan guzlerin=kozlering barmag= varmag dil= til
dirnag= tirnag yaxçi=havola
Sari=çakir akir ag= horon ayak ayag=hadag su=sov
istiyourum= eyorom okuco oxucu=oxogoy. baş=başing basga
olmaz =olmas
Hey Turkic language family, I have one question:
If you talk with someone from other Turkic language, do you understand each other (at least more or less) or nothing common?
Greetings from Hungary.
İn Turkey,We are %80 understand.
As a Turkish, I can understand nearly all of them Oghuz languages (Turkmen, Azerbeijan, Gagauz etc.) and I can understand a most part of other Turkic langugages.
Thanks guys, it could be great!
As a hungarian, we cannot understand one foreign language... Neither our language family (Finnish, Estonian).
Oghuz can understand oghuz clearly (turkish, azeri, gagauz, crimean, turkmen, salar)
İt depends on witch type of turkic language you speaking. Of course all the turkic languages tons of same words but there is some differents for example I'm Kipchak language speaker my mother Tongue is Karachay-Balkar language when I talk to a Kazakh, nogai or Kyrgyz they able to understand me clearly. They even understand the jokes I made and laugh to death. But when I say something to Oghuz type of sprakers they hardly understand what I'm saying maybe %40 of my words. mostly because the prenonce and the words proper meaning but I can tell all the turkic speakers can communicate eachother
The music is kinda odd but video is great! 👏
Tuoba!, Hunnic!, Khazar!, Bulgar!, Pannonian Avar! (OGHUR TURKISH LANGUAGES OKE!!!!!!!!!)
not turkish, you must say TURKIC!
Yes! Ogur lanuages not turkish.. .. Ogur family: 1. Hunnic. 2. Avar 3. Khazar 4. Hefthalita 5. Sabir 6. Hunogur 7. Hungarian (Magyar).
Türkiye winner?
@@Tower_Swagman no no no
@@chepnitatar28 Turkish is a family. We are speaking İstanbul Turkish.
this so extremely well made. I am writing my thesis on history of Turks and this video makes so much sense.
Nazara nazar kaç yazar 🈴
NICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4:02 turkish people were still living in algeria,egypt,balkan and all the other old ottoman territories. Yes,the empire is gone but turks were still living there.
1:56, the video assumes that the Tuoba people were Turkic speakers. However, It is very unlikely that the Tuoba people were Turkic speakers. Most historians agree that the Tuoba people spoke a kind of proto-Mongolic language.
According to who most historians say they were Proto-Mongolic?
For the first time, I see a channel that not a turk is and showing Turks so good👏
Kusura bakma da ingilizcen içler acısı
@@DatBowlingGuy maalesef :(
@@trserhat33 Aga senin için bunu geliştirmeni dileyerek cümleni düzeltecem.
*For the first time, l see a non-turk channel owner that shows Turks so well.
(Good demedim yoksa uyumsuz duruyordu)
The language of Kereit khanate(9th-12th century), Naiman khanate (9th-10th century) and Merkit, Qongrat tribes living throughout Altai mountain and Ordos, north of the Great Wall also should be considered as Turkic languages which existed until Chinghiskhan time.
유의사항 한국어 번역
제가 영상에서 놓친 몇가지가 있습니다.
1.보통투르크어가 보이는 것보다 몇 세기 더 빨리 바이칼호로 퍼졌어야 했습니다.
2.아제르바이잔어가 카자르왕조(1785~1925) 동안 이란에서 쓰였을 수도 있습니다.
3.킵차크어가 13~16세기까지 이집트에서 쓰였는데 제가 놓쳤습니다.
4.현대 터키어는 터키 동남부지역과 시리아, 이라크 북부에 빗금이 쳐져있어야 합니다.
Bro, please speak English 😂 this is so hard 😂
@@yusufaliakyuva2036
It's just a translation of what Dragon historian missed. Dragon historian had written the same already in English.
Southern Syria and Iraq are in a complete minority . During the Qajar period, only a small part of the palace was spoken in Azerbaijani Turkish . Not the people ... So was Egypt
세 번째로 맘루크를 말씀하시는 것 같은데요
@@marqidosad7657
맘루크 왕조의 지배층이 킵차크족 노예출신이라서 그렇습니다.
Seems that the Turkic cultures has always dominated the steppes of central Eurasia for almost 2000 years.
6000😉
@@turan2815 atma!
In your dreams . Blond indoeuropean ruled eastasien turks tousend of years 😁
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzyou 💩
@@legos2001 i know IT hurt😁
진짜멋져요 ....얼마나 연구하고 공부하신걸지...
0. Because the video is not true.
It’s completely fake. Waste of time.
@@Raidon8537There was small mistakes, but overall its good.
@@byambajavr6519where is the fake part?
언제나 늘 수고하십니다~
Welldone
Great viz, poor choice of music
You forgot to put Salar in the video
Epic
I think odds of understanding changes which part of Turkic family you are. As an Oghuz I say I can understand, Gagauz and Azerbaijani are pretty understandable for me. Somehow sometimes Karluk part can be understandable. Oghur, Kıpchak etc... are hard for me. 💪🏻Long live the Turkic family 🐺
Where is Naiman, Keraite, Merkit, Öngüt, Shatuo?
And Jalair (Yaglakar), Bayad, Barga, Kurykan, Bayirku…
@@papazataklaattiranimamcelayir ve bayad moğoldur
@@Timurid1370 evet ama Moğollaşmış Türkler
Рахмет,түркі тілдеріне арнап бейне жасағанына
yayyyyy finally
Very good 🐱
Bro do a video on languages
Enough, don't put Arabic music in videos about Turks.
Yes, Mongolian throat singing is better :)
@@Arabian010 yes , because some turks also does it
Tuoba is indeed Turkish not probably
although some also suggest that instead of being related to the Mongols, they were perhaps related to the Turkic peoples (and spoke a proto-Turkic language).[5][6][7] In the opinion of Peter Boodberg, much of the Tuoba vocabulary was "essentially Turkish with a certain admixture of Mongolian elements".[8]
↑ Kang-i Sun Chang,Stephen Owen (2010). The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 272.
• ↑ Evelyn S. Rawski (2015). Early Modern China and Northeast Asia. p. 123.
• ↑ Mote, Frederick W. (2003). Imperial China 900-1800. p. 170.
• ↑ Charles Holcombe (2001). The Genesis of East Asia: 221 B.C. - A.D. 907. p. 132.
However, Chen (2005)[3] argues that Tuoba (Tabγač) was a Turkic language. The Tabgach identified themselves with the Turkic world tilig, and therefore must have spoken Turkic.[4] According Juha Janhunen, Tabgach might have been speakers of a Bulgharic language.[5]
Chen, Sanping 2005. Turkic or Proto-Mongolian? A Note on the Tuoba Language. Central Asiatic Journal 49.2: 161-73.
David Prager Branner, (2006), The Chinese Rime Tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology, p. 64
Juha Janhunen, (1996), Manchuria: An Ethnic History, p. 190
According to Mahmud al-Kashgari, Tuoba were a division of Turkic peoples.[7]
İbrahim Sarı, (2018), Büyük Türk Tarihi: Tüm ayrıntıları ile Türk Tarihi (1.318 Sayfa), p. 458
Book: Kang-i Sun Chang,Stephen Owen. The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, Vol. 1. 2010. Cambridge University Press. 272.
Book: Evelyn S. Rawski. Early Modern China and Northeast Asia. 2015. 123.
Book: Mote. Frederick W.. Imperial China 900-1800. 2003. 170.
Book: Charles O. Hucker. China's Imperial Past: An Introduction to Chinese History and Culture. registration. 1975. Stanford University Press.. 136-137.
Tuoba is a tribe of Xianbei, which has deeper relationships with Khitan and later Mongols, similar to the relationship between the Goths, Franks, and later Germans. The conquest of northern China by the Xianbei people ended with their sinicization.
However, we do not know whether the ancient vocabulary of Xianbei was referred to as a larger ethnic group such as named Germanic or a tribe name as Goth. Therefore, modern linguists have included both Xianbei and Khitan languages in the Mongolic languages family, instead of including Khitan and Mongolian in the Xianbei language family.
In fact, in the later stage of the Xianbei people's control over northern China, Tuoba no longer had the leadership of the Xianbei people, North China has split into two parts, The east: a Xianbei oriented Chinese who leaders most Xianbei army . The west: a Xianbei King of Yuwen tribe who leads more Chinese and less Xianbei army.
You forgot Salar language en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salar_language
According to historians and linguists, the Proto-Turkic language originated in Central-East Asia region,[39] potentially in Mongolia or Tuva.[40][41] Initially, Proto-Turkic speakers were potentially both hunter-gatherers and farmers, but later became nomadic pastoralists.[42]
you just put contemporary borders for Azerbaijani at 3:00 and then they somehow never change.
I thought I was the only one who noticed that, he also put chagatai Turkic being spoken as far south as Rajasthan (India). This wouldn’t be accurate as the language was only spoken in northern Afghanistan and the transoxiana/ Tarim basin.
@@ProfessorOFanthropology979 I'm pretty sure Chaghatay was spoken by some in that area during the early Mughal period.
@@ZanuDA9711 if it was spoken in India then it would be spoken today, the Mughals spoke Persian or hindi and they stopped speaking chagatai once they had left transoxiana and came to the outskirts of Kabul.
We can understand languages from our own family group only. Ex) speakers of Oghuz languages can understand each other etc. Speakers of Kipchak families can understand each other. We can't understand languages from different family groups much.
This is great but Chagatai is way too exaggerated in India, I love your vids man
want to see cilp " history of philippines" please
Azerbaijani was spoken a lot in Safavid Azerbaijan, and most of Armenia some parts of Georgia and Dagestan were mostly speaking Azerbaijani
Cool
It seems highly likely then from the names that we do know, most of which seem to be Turkic, that the Hunnic elite was predominantly Turkic speaking. However, in the western half of the empire, where most of their subjects spoke Germanic languages, the Huns may have used both Hunnic (Oghuric Turkic) and Gothic. Thus fief holders and royal family mem Ibers in the west who ruled Germanic tribes often bore Germanic or Germanicized titles (of great significance, as we will discover later on in the book), e.g. Laudaricus and Ardaric.105 Priscus, who is our only reliable source, being an actual eye-witness, tells us that at the Hunnic court Hunnic, Gothic and Latin were spoken, but with Hunnic always men tioned before Gothic. All three languages were apparently understood by the elite to some degree, so much so that Zercon the Moor could provoke laughter by jumbling all three together at a Hunnic banquet in the presence of Attila.107 There is, however, no indication anywhere that any of these three languages was the lingua franca.
Kim, H. (2013). Notes. In The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe (pp. 30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511920493.008
Hey! Thank you for the interesting and high-quality video, I really liked it!
The only remark is that I wanted to make this spread of the Azerbaijani language, the map indicates where it is now widespread, but in reality, from the 11th century it is the territory of Atropatena (Not Shirvan (present Azerbaijan)) and from about the 13-14th century, Azerbaijani became dominant in north from Kars to Absheron, in short, both in the Yerevan Khanate and in the Karabakh (85% of the territory) Khanate also spoke mostly Azerbaijani before the conquest of the Caucasus by Russia, when it was partially ousted by the Armenians from other parts of the Ottoman and Qajar empires.
Thank!
*invasion of caucasus by russia
Stop being biased
@@youknow8653 What do you mean? what prejudice? Everything I wrote is science, not bias
@@FaridQarayevF when its an eastern nation, its "invasion"
When its an european nation, its "conquest"
@@youknow8653 These are synonyms and this is history. I myself am an Azerbaijani, and in matters of the history of my country, I do not suffer from bias
@@FaridQarayevF
But "invasion" is often used to describe an enemy nations "conquest"
While "conquest" is used to describe a friendly nations "invasion"
The "friend" at this point is the europe (and america).
And its eurocentric
So nobody is speaking Turkish in southeast Anatolia or northern Iraq and Syria?
There should be hatched. There are so many Kurdish speakers but there are Turkish speakers to.
I think it was good map if we accept the hardships of work, but I think it could be better in some points but Turkic peoples had many dynasties and again I say it is hard work. But some dynasties like Safavids, Afsharids and Qajars had Turkic roots and you can show them under Azerbaijani language. But anyway it is really great work 👍
But they dont spoke turkic.
Establishing empires does not mean spreading the language of the founder
Many ethnic Mongolian tribes migrated to Kazakhstan, Chechnya, Dagestan and other regions
Most of Mongols living under the China 😹😹😹
Except it does. Central asia were primarily iranic and tocharian speaking people before the turkic migration after collapse of xiongnu.
@@xanshen9011 Northern Central Asia was always turkish like part of kazakhstan
@@xanshen9011 iranic and tocharic speakers lived in southern central asia
Prof. Dr. Nicola Di Cosmo in: The Turks: Early ages, Part 4. Huns (Xiongnu): The Origin and Rise of the Xiongnu Empire, Y. T., 2002, pp.217-227, University of Michigan, ISBN 9756782552, 9789756782552
"There is not much doubt among historians about the Turkish nature of the Great Hun Empire, which ruled between 318 B.C. and 216 A.D., as well as that of its predecessor proto-Huns, whose presence was confirmed by Chinese sources. The Great Hun Empire, the Western Hun Empire and especially the European Huns were examined comprehensively by Western historians."
The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28]
The predecessors of Huihe were Xiongnu. Because, customarily, they ride high-wheeled carts. They were also called Gaoche during the Yuan Wei times, or also called Chile, mistakenly rendered as Tiele.
- Xin Tangshu, 232
only the Turkic Gaoju origin of the Hephthalites should be retained as indicative of their primary ethnicity.[82]
Weishu, vol. 103 txt: "高車，[...] 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異，或云其先匈奴之甥也", tr: "The Gaoju, [...] their language and the Xiongnu's are similar though differ a little; or to say it differently, they are the sororal nephews/sons-in-laws of the Xiongnu
"
According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday.[18][19]
Chinese sources link the Tiele people and Ashina to the Xiongnu, According to the Book of Zhou and the History of the Northern Dynasties, the Ashina clan was a component of the Xiongnu confederation.[84][85]
Uyghur Khagans claimed descent from the Xiongnu (according to Chinese history Weishu, the founder of the Uyghur Khaganate was descended from a Xiongnu ruler).[86]
Both the 7th-century Chinese History of the Northern Dynasties[87] and the Book of Zhou,[88] an inscription in the Sogdian language, report the Göktürks to be a subgroup of the Xiongnu.[89][90]
Tiele are originally Xiongnu's splinter stocks. As Tujue are strong and prosperous, all Tiele districts (郡) are divided and scattered, the masses gradually dwindled and weakened. Until the beginning of Wude [era], there have been Xueyantuo, Qibi, Huihe, Dubo, Guligan, Duolange, Pugu, Bayegu, Tongluo, Hun, Sijie, Huxue, Xijie, Adie, Baixi, etc. scattered in the northern wastelands.
- Jiu Tangshu, 199, lower
My love languages 🇰🇿🇰🇿🇰🇿🇰🇿♥♥♥♥♥♥
Do you like Tatars ? I am Tatar
KZ
@@myosotis1306 ne angime😏
Austro-Asiatic next?
I wish so
Very interesting....i love turkic people and turkic languages very much.....
Greetings from italy
Add Scythian Turks
Contemporary descendants of western Scythian groups are found among various groups in the Caucasus and Central Asia, while similarities to eastern Scythian are found to be more widespread, but almost exclusively among Turkic language speaking (formerly) nomadic groups, particularly from the Kipchak branch of Turkic languages (Supplementary Note 1).
Unterländer, M., Palstra, F., Lazaridis, I. et al.Ancestry and demography and descendants of Iron Age nomads of the Eurasian Steppe. Nat Commun 8, 14615 (2017).
We observed particularly high similarity between the Tagar and Classic Scythians from the North Pontic region.
In a comparison of our Tagar series with modern populations in Eurasia, we detected similarity between the Tagar group and some modern Turkic-speaking populations (with the exception of the Indo-Iranian Tajik population) (Fig 7; S2 Table). Among the modern Turkic-speaking groups, populations from the western part of the Eurasian steppe belt, such as Bashkirs from the Volga-Ural region and Siberian Tatars from the West Siberian forest-steppe zone, were more similar to the Tagar group than modern Turkic-speaking populations of the Altay-Sayan mountain system (including the Khakassians from the Minusinsk basin) (Fig 7).
Based on our results, we can preliminarily conclude that there was genetic continuity, at least partially, between the Early, the Middle and the Late Tagar populations. We did not find evidence of extensive gene exchange between the Tagar population and any genetically distinct (with respect to the mtDNA pool) human groups.
Maternal genetic features of the Iron Age Tagar population from Southern Siberia (1st millennium BC)
Pilipenko AS, Trapezov RO, Cherdantsev SV, Babenko VN, Nesterova MS, et al. (2018)Maternal genetic features of the Iron Age Tagar population from Southern Siberia (1st millennium BC). PLOS ONE 13(9): e0204062.
Scythians were iranic. Sorry to break your illusion.
@@xanshen9011 this theory got debunked
Arzhan-2, the archaeological site of world significance, a national treasure of peoples of Tuva and Russia, located in the «Valley of Kings» (Piy-Khemsk District, Tyva Republic), was investigated in 2001-2004 by the Central Asian Archaeological Expedition of the State Hermitage Museum headed by K.V. Chugunov. The sites has been dated to the 7th c. BC and attributed to the Scythian-Siberian cultural community. When exploring the «royal» burial of the early Scythian site of Arzhan-2, the scientists faced the questions of the origin of the buried, periodization and chronology of the monument, its archaeological-cultural attribution, the autochthonous nature of the population that left it, and its relationship with other Eurasian early nomadic cultures. The present study is addressing the most important issue of the appearance of the buried people and characteristics of their anthropological type. The material for the study was comprised of male and female skulls from burial 5 of Arzhan-2 mound. The article describes in detail the process of reconstruction of the physical appearance of the deceased and provides examples of calculating ante mortem parameters based on craniometric measurements. The complex stages of preliminary work related to the restoration of skulls and manufacturing of their exact copies are highlighted. The results of the physical appearance reconstruction are presented in the form of visual museum objects - sculptural portraits. The scientific reconstruction of the ante mortem appearance on skulls of the «king» and «queen» was carried out in the Laboratory of Anthropological Reconstruction of the Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences by anthropologists Drs E.V. Veselovskaya and R.M. Galeev. In anthropological terms, the buried show a peculiar mosaic of Caucasoid and Mongoloid features. They are characterized by brachycephaly and dome-shaped head, with notably developed rugosity of the supercilium in the man and its absence in the woman. For the man, an average width of the face and a narrow forehead of medium height are noted. The woman has broad face and forehead, the height of the forehead is average. Both portraits are characterized by prominent position of eyeballs and large eyes. Man’s nose is short, prominent, with convex dorsum. Woman’s nose has a wavy dorsum, and is slightly prominent. On the male portrait, the cheekbones are moderate, on the female one - high and prominent. Faces of the «royal» persons are flattened in the upper part, with a certain degree of alveolar prognathism. The lower jaw of the man is medium in size, narrow in the corners. For the woman, some gracility of the lower jaw can be noted.
Veselovskaya, E.V. & Galeev, Ravil. (2020). Anthropological reconstruction of the physical appearance of the «king» and «queen» from the early Scythian burial and memorial complex of Arzhan-2. VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII. 112-122. 10.20874/2071-0437-2020-49-2-10.
Early physical analyses have unanimously concluded that the Saka, even those far to the east (e.g. the Pazyryk region), possessed predominantly "Europid" features, although mixed 'Euro-mongoloid" phenotypes also occur, depending on site and period.
Сергей Иванович Руденко (Sergei I. Rudenko) (1970). Frozen Tombs of Siberia: The Pazyryk Burials of Iron Age Horsemen. University of California Press. pp. 45-46. ISBN 978-0-520-01395-7. Archived from the original on 2017-03-27. Retrieved 2016-09-25.
The Scythians feature in the treatise as an evocative umbrella for Russia’s Turkic neighbours, one of the Asiatic hordes against which the now self-avowedly Western empire struggled to carry out its civilizing mission.
Meyer, C. (2020). From Scythian Ethnography to Aryan Christianity: Herodotean Revolutions on the Eve of the Russian Revolution. In T. Harrison & J. Skinner (Eds.), Herodotus in the Long Nineteenth Century (pp. 200-223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108562805.009
Another study by the same team, again of mtDNA from two Scytho-Siberian skeletons found in the Altai Republic, showed that they had been typical males "of mixed Euro-Mongoloid origin". One of the individuals was found to carry the F2a maternal lineage, and the other the D lineage, both of which are characteristic of East Eurasian populations.
@@Nomadicenjoyer31 The term “scythian” was a catch all umbrella term the greeks used for steppe nomads. While the scythians themselves were many different tribes and nations the scythian culture as a whole was iranic.
Maybe SOME eastern scythians had some admixture with turkic tribes in south siberia, as evidenced by skeletal remains found in the area harboring both mongoloid and caucasoid traits, this DOES NOT MEAN that the scythians as a whole were turks!
@@xanshen9011 saka iran indo orupa. I lam race iran aria saka
@@Nomadicenjoyer31 saka language iran aira l lam race aria saka sakestan iran. kafaza alan osetia iron saka aira sun= xor xor khor hedd= sar shar. Iran aria mad pars part(saka) iraon saka sarmetia kafkaz. Saka Siberia çin centet asia iran kafkaz orupa. My languge is close to saka.iran anitigueites(pasargad takht jamshid 2500 BC tehre saka( saka hom nosh,saka paraderya,saka tiz khod kings name sekonkha,saka suoth west chin mongula south sibira) ( heroic iranian shahname hero rostem sakzi saksi balasakan sakanshah sakiz iranina people & indo orupa.
ALTAY dillerine bu Müzik ne uymuş
Arap müzigi eşliginde Türk dil soy agaci
Turkish was more common in the Balkan geography during the Ottoman period
It would have been more appropriate to show it in a darker color on the map
Still nice video thanks
Hello, can you also do for robbeets hypothesis?
These videos are so amazing!
I love how Turkish and Chinese sharing word for water . We both call it “su”
And we call dumplings same in Turkish Korean and Mongolian “mantı- mandu”
@@fundacure2832 even russians calls it so, manti. 😁
turkic word for Book is the same as chinese too. Not surprising as the turks lived just north of china for most of its history til recently. Chinese adopted from Turks too like the Chinese word Chengli and Tian(heaven) is from Turkic Tengri(Heaven/God)
Not even phonetically close to Turkish or other Turkic
@@aboba5995 they are talking about etymology of the word not the phonetic of the languages dummy lmao
Qaraqalpaq tili❤
Very interesting 👌
Oghur It is the same Uyghur???
A hypothesis can also be put forward that the Dravidian languages from South India preserved as linguistic enclaves in Afghanistan, and the Turkic languages and their ancestors had direct contacts and possibly a common base, not less than 4000 years ago..
It would be interesting to note that both Dravidian and Turkic historical linguistics are well established fields with more than a century of tradition..
Interesting point
나중에 모든 어족을 합친 언어사 지도 가능한가요?
몇년은 걸리겠지만 언젠가는 만들 의향이 있습니다
My native language is Azerbaijani Turkish 🇦🇿
Bunu yazıb nə əldə etməyə çalışırsan ?
Where is White Huns?
The link established by the original Weishu between the Hephtalites and the Gaoju may mean that the Hephtalites were a Turkish tribe and , more precisely , an Oghuric one , as the Gaoju are regarded as inheritors of the old Tiele confederation supposed to be the origin of the various Oghuric tribes .
DE LA VAISSIÈRE, ÉTIENNE. “Is There a ‘Nationality of the Hephtalites’?” Bulletin of the Asia Institute, vol. 17, 2003, pp. 119-32.
Huns are not turks they we're speaking a Alanno-Germano-Hunnic languages based on Xiongnu and local languages which doesn't have anything to do with turkic
@@Skikdii 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
@@Skikdii no the HUNS spock a OLD TURKIC LANGUAGE and not GEY german or Alan language
I'm Sakha!!!
According to this map the origin's of Turkic language is in modern day Gansu/Ningxia/Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia provinces of China. That places it very close to the origins of Sinitic languages(Sino-Tibetan originates in Shaanxi, Gansu and Qinghai) and overlaps with the Chinese state of Qin. Why are there so few shared words between the Turkic and Sinitic languages like the situation you see between Sinitic and Kra-Dai languages for example.
Mongolian is a different language and it has its own dialects, Both Mongolian and Turkic are in Altaic language family. Such as Both Hebrew and Arabic are in Semitic language family but they are different languages,
Here is example of same sentence (i used Turkish latin alphabet for all)
Mongolian = çi keniig alsan be?
Uzbek= Kimni ōldirding
Turkish =Kimi öldürdün?
Türkmenistan= kimi öldürding?
Uyghur= Kimni öltürding?
Azerbayjan= kimi öldürdün?
Kazakh= kimdi öltirding?
Kyrgyz=kimdi öltürdüng?
@@PimsleurTurkishLessons Right so there are a ton language contact and cultural blending between Mongols and Turks over thousands of years, no doubt about that. My question was, there was also a ton of contact between various Turkic and Chinese states. The were always trade, war, politics between SIno-Tibetan speaking people and Turkic people(especially in the very strategic Hexi Corridor area) over thousands of years as well and Turkic groups even created some minor dynasties in various periods in Chinese history. Why are there no linguistic connections(loan words and grammar influence) between the two. The only one can recognize might be related is the world "Tengri" and "Tian"(Old chinese "ten") which is the world for heaven.
@@dsong2006 there is no any connection between Tengri = God and Tian=ten :D.
if you call this as connection then i can say top=ball in Turkish but it means different in English so is top a Turkish orginal word in English?
Mongolian and Turkish are in same language family "Altaic" which is aggulunative so here are lots of suffixes so lots of syllables. But chinese is in one syllable language family no suffixes. Also geneticly mongolian and chinese are not even close.
@@PimsleurTurkishLessons I'm not saying Turks are related to Chinese, not at all. What I am saying is languages develop loanwords through contact. And there are over 1000 year of contact between Chinese and Xiongnu/Xianbei/Rouran/Old Uyghurs and other Turkic people. Language contact is the reason why Korean has significant chinese vocabulary in the nouns. Or why Thai(Kra-Dai) and Vietnamese(Austro-Asiatic) for ex. uses Chinese numbers. Those languages are not related to Chinese but has shared words with Chinese through contact.
@@dsong2006 1. Turkic. altyn ~ altun 'gold' altun 'gold' (Räsänen, 1969, 18, 488).
2. Turk. baqšy ~ baqsy 'storyteller'
I LOVE UZBEKISTAN🇺🇿
Not sure about modern Uyghur emerging so late. I'm pretty sure it was widely spoken in the region after the fall of the Chagatai.
Brother, can you do this in relation to Iranian languages?
Before the stalin genocide and the breaking of the linguistic and cultural ties of the Turks, a common Turkic language was spoken all over Turkistan (Central Asia).
Таджики и памирские народы ираноязычны.
They just learned from a genocide expert country
No it wasn''t
@@Fummy007It was
🤝✊
3:55 that made me sad (bu beni üzdü)
Naturally we also have more probable Turkic etymologies for these names, especially for those of Attila and Bleda. However, even if they were Germanic or Germanicized Turkic names," ,99 this does not allow us to make any hasty assumptions about the official language of the empire, if it ever existed. What Heather ignores is the fact that we have convincing or highly probable Turkic etymologies for the names of many of the other Hunnic kings and nobles before and after Attila, e.g. Mundzuk (Attila's father, from Turkic Muncuq = 'pearl/jewel'), Oktar/Uptar (Attila's uncle, Öktär = "brave/power ful'), Oebarsius (another of Attila's paternal uncles, Aïbârs = 'leopard of the moon'), Karaton (Hunnic supreme king before Ruga, Qaraton = 'black cloak'), Basik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, early fifth century, Bårsig= 'governor'), Kursik (Hunnic noble of royal blood, from either Kürsig, meaning 'brave or noble', or Qursiq meaning 'belt-bearer'). All three of Attila's known sons have probable Turkic names: Ellac, Dengizich, Hernak, and Attila's principal wife, the mother of the first son Ellac, has the Turkic name Herekan, as does another wife named Eskam (Ešqam = 'companion of the Shaman).102
It's so strange that avar and balkan bulgar language just randomly appeared and then disappeared.
Its probably due that many Turkic minorities in the Balkans had an Shift to Oghuz Turkic words because of the Ottomans and were declared as Ottoman Turkish. The Crimean Tatar Language and nowadays Turkish are very close even to Anatolian Turkish is an Oghuz language and the Crimean one is a Tatar language.
Because they got assimilated by local population or slaughtered.
@@xanshen9011 they got assimilated to local slavs
Чувашский язык наследник древнебулгарского языка.
There's a small mistake: Azeri turkic was spoken in a bigger area than the modern Azerbaijan map you used
Not Turkish but Turkic. Azerbaijani is a Turkic language, not Turkish
@@cavanshlr thanks I corrected it
@@tumzamanlarneniyisimuhamme5248 Bu daha çok bir kelime oyunu. Sadece ingilizce, Anadolu türkleri söz konusu olduğu zaman "turkish" kelimesi kullanılıyor, ama tüm türkler için (buraya Anadolu türkleri de dahil) - "turkic" kelimesi kullanıyoruz. Hatta "slavic", "roman" kelimeleri de aynı şekilde kullanılır
@@aytansafarli7701 He yani benim İngilizce dil bilgisizliğimden kaynaklı tamam o zaman siliyorum yorumu.
@@cavanshlrThey call themselves Turkish in their country, i surprised too. There is no any language called azerbaijani in azerbaijan, they say its Turkish.
WHAT IS THIS MUSIC BRO ? PUT A TÜRKIÇ MUSIC LIKE ATTARGAH DOMBRA OR ERTUGRUL.
Change the music please!
Azerbaijani was spoken not only in iran, but in north Caucasus and modern day armenia. it was a lingua franca at that time.
+ at the western Azerbaijans (m.d. armenia, Kars and Igdir cities) territory until the beginning of the 20st century, Azerbaijanis were a majority. you just took a map from Wikipedia thats showing modern day spread of a language, and even it is incorrect.
In Iraq, too, there is talk of Azerbaijan
@@acjfrk5464 yes, in Kərkük there's more rh han a million azerbaijanis, that still speaks to each other in their mother tongue
@Elvin Bağırlı Yes, in Kirkuk there are Turks, but I am from Tal Afar.
The Turkic people are believed to have originated in today Manchuria (northeastern China). They were partially agriculturalists but adopted a nomadic life. Than they started their journey to the West. (The Turkic migration).
During and after the conquest of Central-Asia and some other places, they assimilated some of the locals (mostly Indo-Europeans/R1a).
All Neo-Siberians have origins in Northeast Asia including Korea（hg K2a/NO+C2）. They split from common ancestors from Northeast Asians before migrating to absorb Paleo-Siberians K2b/Q.R1a
Turkic people Genetic marker =K（K2a+K2b）and C2b
K2a（N1a+O2）+C2b/Proto-Altaic
K2b（R1a z93+Q1）+C2b/ancient siberian
Proto-Altaic
=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic languages/Yakut+Koreanic+Japonic/Ainu
K2b/R1a+Q1→Mongolia C2b→Bering Strait→Americas →Native American
mtDNA=ABCD
Mongolian=53.8％C2+10.8％O2+10.8％N1+4.6%P* (xQ,R)+9.2%R1a
K2a/NO，Origin: mainland China, Indochina
1，N1+O2→Manchuria C2/C1a1→Liao River Civilization
2，N1+O2→Mongolia，Manchuria C2b→Mongolian+Southern Tungusic
3，Manchuria O2+C2/C1a1→Korean Peninsula→Goguryeo
Koreans=Samhan+Goguryeo
Korean = 20%-37%O1b2+(40%O2 +15%C2)
4，D1→ Manchuria C2/C1a1→ Hokkaido →Jomon/Ainu
Northeast Japan C12.5 + D 87.5 = 100%
5，Korean Peninsula O1b2+O2→ Yayoi people
Janpanese=Jomon+Yayoi
Janpanese=35-40%D1+(30%-35%O1b2+15-20%O2)
6，Proto Altaic NC→Siberia→Ugric/Northern Tungusic/Paleo-Siberian
Second migration
1，Mongolia C2N1O2→Central Asia/Indo-European/R1aJ=Eurasian/The modern Turkic people
2，N1a→Siberia → Eastern Europe/Northern Europe=Tatars N+R1a (R-M458)，Finnish N+I，some Slavs R1a (R-M458) I2+N：Latvians，Estonians，Baltic
3，The modern Turkic people→Middle East /JGER1b=Anatonian Turks
K2a→NO→O→O1+O2→O1a+O1b1+O1b2+O2
O1 Liangzhu/Hemudu culture
Fujian O1a→Taiwan→Philippines→Oceania→
Austronesian O1a+C1b
O1a，O1b1→Tai-Kadai/Baiyue people→Laos,Thailand
O1b1→natives of Southeast Asia
O1b2→Korean/Samhan
Sino-Tibetan O2+D1a1
O2 → Qinghai → Tibet → Tibetan (aborigines D1a1 + O2)
O2→Qinghai → Northern China → Han people/O2a2b+O2a2a → Manchuria/Dong yi people
Y-chromosome haplogroup O2-M122 is a common DNA marker in Han Chinese, as it appeared in China in prehistoric times.Other Y-DNA haplogroups that have been found with notable frequency in samples of Han Chinese includ
O1a 13,0%
C- M217 12,0%
N-M231 10,3%
O1b 7,2%
Q-M242 4,2%
Tibetan=51.6% D + 33.9% O2 (M122) + 2.6% C-M217
Turkic people are NOT originated in today Manchuria, mongol are . It is more likely turkic get that type of DNA through intermarrige with mongol
@@kellyma2992 Mongolian carry Haplogroup C2,Siberian dominant haplogroup N
About 50,000 years ago, C2 entered East Asia, and C1 entered Southeast Asia
About 40,000 years ago,K2 split into MNOPQRS entered East Asia and Siberia
MS remained in Southeast Asia
NO remained in East Asia
PQR remained in Siberia
About 30,000 years ago, QR separated
About 20,000 years ago R went to Europe and Q went to America
Therefore, Native Americans：Q1 C2 R1
As the climate began warming at around 18,000 years ago, the Beringia region also became more moist and the sea level rose,submerging the land bridge .
About 10,000-15,000 years ago, N1O2 entered Mongolia and mixed with C2Q1R1
Among them, those who stayed in East Asia became the Mongolian race（NOQC2MS）
Mongolian race= East Asians, Asean（Austronesian，Tai-Kadai..）, Altaic people (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic speaking people), American Indians/Native Americans
East Asians and Native Americans are Sinodont
They carry the EDAR gene, found in ancient and modern East Asians, Southeast Asians and Native Americans but not common in African or European populations
About 5000-10000 years ago
Xiongnu/（C2 N1a O2a Q1）+ R1a→Xianbei → Rouran → Turkic Empire →Mongol Empire→ Qing Empire
Mongolian=53,8%C2+10,8%O2+10,8%N1+4,6%P* (xQ,R)+9,2%R1a
The proto-Altaic people split into two groups N1a and O2a+C2
Most of the Altaic people who remained in the east became Han chinese，Mongolian，Southern Tungusic（Manchu，Xibe），Korean，Janpanese
Han chinese=50%O2a+13,0%O1a+ 12,0%C2+ 10,3%N1+ 7,2%O1b + 4,2%Q1
Genetically, Manchu exhibit roughly equal frequencies of the Y-DNA haplogroups N1a（formerly N1c）, O2a and C2 (formerly C3).
N1a enter Siberia and became the Neo-Siberians (absorb Paleo-Siberians Q1R1C2)
They are divided into Four groups：
1， Siberian Turks：The Khakas，Chukchi people，The Tuvans，Dolgans，The Yakuts，Yukaghir people，Yukaghir people
N1a has been found with greatest frequency among indigenous peoples of Siberian Turks
2，North Tungusic（Evenks，Evens，Oroqen），North Mongolians（Buryats，Kalmyks）
3，Uralic people：Samoyedic +Ugric people
Enets，Nganasans，Nenets，about 90%N1a
Finns + Hungarian people
4，Native American，Inuit，Yeniseian people
O2a+C2 enter the Korean peninsula,where they assimilated the earlier inhabitants of the peninsula(O1b).
Korean=41%O2+31%O1b2+15%C2+4%N1a+3%O1a+2%O1b1+2%QR..
During the Yayoi period, haplogroup O1b2+O2a started to arrive and spreaded to every region of Japan.
Origin of Japanese: Jomon (D1a2+C1a1) + Korean peninsula /Yayoi (O2a+O1b2).
3，Historians believe that the Huns were not a single ethnicity but a confederation-like grouping of Siberian natives（N1a Q1 C2） and Indo-European tribes（R1aR1b，Old European（I ））.
N1a+QR1a：Khanty and Mansi，Pannonian Avars
N+R1aI：Some Slavic peoples，Finns，Hungarians，Latvians，Estonians，Balts，Bashkirs，Shorians，Tatars.
R1aR1b+I：Ukrainian, Czechs, Bulgarians, Russians
Haplogroup I is the oldest major haplogroup in Europe
The national groups of Eastern Europe are characterized by dominant haplogroups R1a/ Slavs or I2, while those of Western Europe are characterized by dominant haplogroups R1b or I1
The first settlers I1+I2
The second group of settlers R1b
The third group of settlers R1a+N1a
4，The modern Turkic people are a mixture of Eurasian People. These includes Indo-Iranian (R1az93+J2)and Indo-European tribes of Central Asia who becomes Turkic for 2000 years ago.
O2a+C2 enter Central Asia and became the Central Asian Turks：Kazakhs and Kyrgyzs
"Origin of "Proto-Altaic"
language=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic+Koreanic+Japonic"
R1 dominates Indo-European languages
R1a dominant Slavs + Indo-Iranians (Pashtuns, Iranians, Indians)
R1b dominant Western European
Q dominates Native American，Inuit people, Yenisei people
N dominates Urals and Yakutia
O dominate Japanese Korean Chinese
C2 dominates Mongolian Kazakh Tungusic
@@user-rn6nb2ey7e that's what exactly what i means , turkic carry Q while other asian don't carry at all , they may be a mix of the different waves of people who migrate north .
Turk not Q
In thrace of Turkey , everyone speaks turkish how come you show with lines?
탁발선비어는 몽골어족 영상에서도 나온거같은데 무슨 어족이 맞는 건가요?
아직 상당한 논쟁이 있는 부분이라 여기서는 물음표를 표기했습니다. 주요 언어학자 중 유하 얀후넨은 튀르크어족설을 지지하고 알렉산더 보빈은 몽골어족설을 지지하고 있습니다.
Bir kun barcha turkiylar birlashadi🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇷🇰🇿🇹🇲
❤❤❤
Turkic=Best language family of all time😻
I hate turans
@@user-md9pl9ly9j Do not be afraid! Nobody will hurt you.You can eat bat with peace of mind.
@@user-md9pl9ly9j we are not Turanians. Turanians are eastern caucasian iranians. Eastern Turanians were mixed with Turks. So eastern Turanians were half east-asian.
@@Raidon8537 turan ismi irani kökenliymiş sanırım neden turan diyorlar ki bize
@@born_this_way doğu iranilerden kalma terim işte bu.
My question.
How are the Altai Speakers both Koreans and Japanese categorized as the Turkic tribal speakers?
Probably in primitive period. Tungus, Mongolian, Japanese and Korean languages isolated and evolved by theirself not part of Turkic language family just part or similar with Altai language.
@@sertankay86 Transeurasian language is both the mother tongue of Korean, Japanese and Turkish language which has derived in North East China somewhere between 9,000 years ago.
@@AdoptedCats this theory was debunked years ago
@@begum2583 The branches of Eurasiatic vary between proposals, but typically include Altaic (Mongolic, Tungusic and Turkic), Chukchi-Kamchatkan, Greenberg's "Korean-Japanese-Ainu". Some proposals group Eurasiatic with even larger macrofamilies.
Explain, why do you said, "Debunked ?"
@@AdoptedCats It is not as realistic a theory as the Indo-European hypothesis. These are genetically and linguistically different languages/people. There is no such thing as an Altaic language anyway, our contact with the parata pro mongols begins in 500 BC, we have no contact before that, all the dates are already written. The ancestors of the Turks exchanged words with the Pre-Indo-Iranian tribes, the Pre-Ural tribes, the Pre-Indo-European tribes, the Pre-Para proto-Mongol tribes, the Pre-Chinese tribes and the Pre-Tohar tribes between the Middle Bronze Age and the Middle Antiquity. It should be in a place where the Pre-Turks can come into contact with all of these peoples. According to this information, if we come to the first living area of the Proto-Turks according to the vocabulary of the Turkic language and mutual exchanges, it will be in a place suitable for the peoples and language phonics with whom they exchange words.
there are also many cities and along the Turkish border with Syria and Iraq that speak turkish
I think Proto-Turkic urheimat is around lake Baikal and central Mongolia
Yeah
Most people think like that