I've found the Monarchy Government Type is useful for roleplay when combined with Feudal Society and the one civic that adds noble leader jobs who's name alludes me.
@@airmanbunny9767 Aristocratic Elites. It is bad. Replace a politician for a Noble that produces +2 stability and get a building that lets you build 1 additional Noble.
@@kamaha0010 It's so bullshit we can't use Exalted Priesthood with Imperial. I want to be able to make Egyptian Priest Kings in space. We are already fucked over when it comes to playing a rightous hero king since Philospher King is so utterly shit. They should at least allow us to go full Kingdom of God lead by The Holy Warrior Priest crusading across the galaxy.
@@kamaha0010 Aristocratic elites is good, actually. It was bad after pop rebalance when the normal ruler pop were enough for amenities, but once the ruler amenities got balanced for the lower planet populations, the stability is great especially if you have to get holotheater anyways. The special building for more rulers isn't usually worth it though, but they're useful in a slave economy for higher stability
Welp, Feudal Society and Imperial Cult require Imperial authority. So if you wanna roleplay as god emperor or just save yourself a perk slot while vasal-run, it's kinda must have.
Actually strat this is mp bias talking, in sp on a huge map makes it the best government type for conquest by far (then dictatorship is better late game for the size penalty reduction). it shaves like 15 years off of speedrun galactic conquest with claims.
true, that's a good point, i do have a good excuse though 95% of my playtime is in MULTIPLAYER, i NEVER play singleplayer...so yes, the entire channel is like that i know some people will see this as heresy, BUT HEY!
Depends on the situation such as roleplay or PvP personally I enjoy both as stellaris caters to a large range of players which is why its such a great game.
To me that's the fun is finding broken combinations and t et ing th once or twice. I once made an empire where I was a religiosos megacorp and finished my unity while my friend was still on her 3rd unity thing
Imperial cult + execeutive vigor + feudal society = unity generation out the bumbum and all the edicts you could ever want. Or you could go down the alternate route and take a better AP rather than EV. People don't realize just how much unity you lose from leader upkeep.
I have a monarchy with nobility civic on a doomsday world Also it's fun how the first heir won't live much longer than their parent because they are "born" at the same time
I usually only go Imperial if I'm roleplaying and I know I'm playing with people who struggle to get like 10k by year 30. Then I like to go psionic philosopher king, imperial cult, feudal society and try to go for emperor of the universe.
But dont forgot - Feudal Society is in one of the best ways to save unity at the start + we have hing chance to get a Eye For Talent ruler trait when we get 1 more slot for civic we can change the type of government
I won my first game with a immortal emperor chosen one trait, my leader was 250 years old by the end of the game and actually started as a archon cause I used oligarchy .
I hate that imperial goverment is considert bad ,i really like to play it. There should be more mechanics to make it, more different from dictatorial like growing dynanasty of something not just automaticly apointed heir
![Chino Pacas - Modo Capone (with Drake & Fuerza Regida) [Video Oficial]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zjv8TQ0gBkg/mqdefault.jpg)
I've found the Monarchy Government Type is useful for roleplay when combined with Feudal Society and the one civic that adds noble leader jobs who's name alludes me.
Aristocratic society, I think?
Yeah, that's it. Thanks!
@@airmanbunny9767 Aristocratic Elites. It is bad. Replace a politician for a Noble that produces +2 stability and get a building that lets you build 1 additional Noble.
@@kamaha0010 It's so bullshit we can't use Exalted Priesthood with Imperial. I want to be able to make Egyptian Priest Kings in space.
We are already fucked over when it comes to playing a rightous hero king since Philospher King is so utterly shit. They should at least allow us to go full Kingdom of God lead by The Holy Warrior Priest crusading across the galaxy.
@@kamaha0010 Aristocratic elites is good, actually. It was bad after pop rebalance when the normal ruler pop were enough for amenities, but once the ruler amenities got balanced for the lower planet populations, the stability is great especially if you have to get holotheater anyways. The special building for more rulers isn't usually worth it though, but they're useful in a slave economy for higher stability
Welp, Feudal Society and Imperial Cult require Imperial authority. So if you wanna roleplay as god emperor or just save yourself a perk slot while vasal-run, it's kinda must have.
It was better before the change to edicts. Imperial used to give +1 edict capacity.
Inward perfectionist moment.
The boomer trait.
The emperor protects, and for the protection of the people you are hence banned from existence. The Royal Guards would like to know your location
The galactic emperor who also happens to be an immortal psionic: pathetic...
Who also happened to catch arrested development at level 2 in an old patch: yes, yes indeed I am. But I'm not going to suffer alone.
Actually strat this is mp bias talking, in sp on a huge map makes it the best government type for conquest by far (then dictatorship is better late game for the size penalty reduction). it shaves like 15 years off of speedrun galactic conquest with claims.
true, that's a good point, i do have a good excuse though
95% of my playtime is in MULTIPLAYER, i NEVER play singleplayer...so yes, the entire channel is like that
i know some people will see this as heresy, BUT HEY!
I play primarily single player and don't understand can you explain please?
Influence makes claims and all the cool op things like ecuminopolus and orbital rings. He's saying in single player that's actually really good.
People design their empires based on what gives the best stats??? That just seems to take the fun out of Stellaris, ngl...
B-B-BUT, THE NUMBERS
BIGGER = BETTER
Depends on the situation such as roleplay or PvP personally I enjoy both as stellaris caters to a large range of players which is why its such a great game.
To me that's the fun is finding broken combinations and t et ing th once or twice. I once made an empire where I was a religiosos megacorp and finished my unity while my friend was still on her 3rd unity thing
fun is very subjective same as....fetish
Let me tell you about competitive stellaris
Monarchy is objectively the most Based form of goverment.
Imperial cult is a pretty nice civic though and you can only get it with monarchy. Plus 100 edict points is no joke.
Imperial cult + execeutive vigor + feudal society = unity generation out the bumbum and all the edicts you could ever want.
Or you could go down the alternate route and take a better AP rather than EV. People don't realize just how much unity you lose from leader upkeep.
Monarchy with Feudal and the other one I forget with Knights of the Toxic God is max roleplay and I love it.
I mostly run imperial authority so I don't have to deal with elections, tbh
It's a shame too because some of the sickest and most interesting civics require the imperial authority, ike imperial cult or feudal society.
Now it is much better. +10% resourse output in capital system is huge for void dveller and shatted ring origins
I'm glad too see legend of the galactic heros clips in your videos. And you are using the original version no less. You truly are a man of good taste.
I find it pretty good to start Oligarch, get a good leader and then convert into a Monarchy or similar!
I require the imperial government type for my Neue Reich larp.
I have a monarchy with nobility civic on a doomsday world
Also it's fun how the first heir won't live much longer than their parent because they are "born" at the same time
Just like real life....
i forgot the signature line!!!
@@Strategiser2 so, points for realism, I guess...?
I usually only go Imperial if I'm roleplaying and I know I'm playing with people who struggle to get like 10k by year 30. Then I like to go psionic philosopher king, imperial cult, feudal society and try to go for emperor of the universe.
Hapsburgs: "Megh mmm sun! Megh mm ship! Megh mm fragile infrastructure!
dam
Enlightened Autocracy, my favorite way to play hierarchical tech genocides
But dont forgot - Feudal Society is in one of the best ways to save unity at the start + we have hing chance to get a Eye For Talent ruler trait
when we get 1 more slot for civic we can change the type of government
Teh Emprah proteccs!
>Play Monarch
>MAX XENOPHOBE
>Policies: Purge
>Bombardment: Armageddon
Philospher king + psionic ascencion was kinda good when i was playing, you could have OP leaders
I tried agriculture idyl, nature protectors and gaia-world civic xD try this challange ... its hard to get alloys PS: dont destroy nature
It makes phenominal roleplay
Which Stellaris monarchy is best?
Despotic Empire
Enlightened Monarchy
Feudal Empire
Theocratic Monarchy
Celestial Empire
Divine Empire
Irenic Monarchy
Star Empire
Martial Empire
Despotic Hegemony
Illuminated Autocracy
Mortal Empire
Bandit Kingdom
Blood Court
I love playing feudal empire and releasing every planet i colonize as a vassal
Remember kids: always play monarchy or dictatorship, they’re the only based ways to play Stellaris. We hate all Xeno scum. FOR THE EMPEROR!!
I’ve literally never payed attention to my rulers and I’ve played a lot of monarchy 😅
I won my first game with a immortal emperor chosen one trait, my leader was 250 years old by the end of the game and actually started as a archon cause I used oligarchy .
I hate that imperial goverment is considert bad ,i really like to play it. There should be more mechanics to make it, more different from dictatorial like growing dynanasty of something not just automaticly apointed heir
CITIZEN REPUBLIC
I like not losing a powerful leader to an election.
Luckly there are some mods that make monarchies more fun, wait where else did I hear that?
Where is the video on screen 😮
lmao, i was an idiot, forgot
I do have a pacifist monarchy but they are xenophobe too so it balance
And they are spiritualist too
I play pacifist because Im too scared that I would lose in war ( I have 1000 times stronger army than my enemies)
Did you know that I'm real life absolute monarchy is objectively the best goverment? Now you do
mfw 90% of my empires are monarchies
For The Emperor!
Best.
¡VIVAN CARLOS I° Y 2°!
Me, a Spaniard watching this video: 💀💀💀
i clicked the video but it does not work :(((
I play pacifist. :(
Dislike the video. For the green apples
= D
Lol