Not bad, well done! Must have been an absolute horrendous experience..it's great that you pointed out the detail of the double bottom that holds the ship together for a lil while making it accurant to the latest of theories of the breakup. Really nice! 👍👍
I like this theory, very much, but in my opinion the kell should break off the minute the ship breaks and the 3 funnel should break off the base when the funnel falls. Besides this it’s a great video. Thanks 😃
WW2 German veteran lost their lives 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 😢😢😢😢😢😢 😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😢😭😭😭😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢
@@EricLYT it doesn't account for survivors saying it broke into several pieces, it didn't go vertical, and worst of all, the double bottom cannot hold the titanic like that, the double bottom is very brittle.
@@EricLYT it's literally supported by survivor testimonies, Read the Book On A Sea of Glass, you'll get a handful of testimonies there, I'm a Titanic enthusiast who studies the ship's sinking, and I bet I know a lot more than you do.
Ok lets talk about the break up the double bottom could not bend like an shoe leater if that even happened stern would go down inmediatly with the bow after break up. And it could be impossible that the non-buoyant water fulled bow would not make stern go down with him.
@BB-61 Iowa There were no such ting. It is now known that none of the ship’s boliers exploded, and the only boilers who left their place during the sinking were the five boilers who were placed right were the Titanic split in half. But like i said, there is nothing at around the scene of the wreck which suggests that any of the ship’s boilers exploded during the sinking. Many survivors reported that they heard one or several «explosions» from the Titanic right towards the end of the sinking, most of the survivors said they thought this loud noise came from either the boilers and/or the engines leaving their beds and went crashing down into the Titanic. But these «explosions» came in fact due to the ship breaking up.
@@patrickanderson9023 the boilers didn’t implode, the ship did. Because of the trapped air inside the stern, the air condenses as it falls lower. The air gets so compressed it implodes because of the pressure.
@@a_lbymccool1478 1. the sinking theory is from 1997 2. The bow didn't hold on to the stern by the double bottom, thats impossible, heres a video explaining why ruclips.net/video/ggu5Moi2GEM/видео.html idk the exact timestamp but i think its near the start 3. the ship way too fast. Now i get that they sped up the animation but the funnels collapse in real-time and the speed doesnt change at all doesnt change
@@dariusthesimp5943 I 100% agree! This theory is very similar to the James Cameron 2012 theory, which I have a lot of issues with. The theory I currently believe the most is the theory from the book On a sea of glass. That theory just adds up the most to me. This animation is, as far as visuals, is pretty well done. It’s just riddled with inaccuracies: The ships sinking is very sped up, while things like the funnele collapsing and the breakup happen in real time, the port list doesn’t eliminate itself as the bridge goes under, the two forward funnels collapsing to port instead of starboard, the stern only rising like 15 degrees out of the water as opposed to the more likely 24 to 26 degree angle, the fact of the double bottom acts like a banana peel and breaks the laws of physics in every way possible, and also the stern not going vertical before it goes down. The list just goes on and on: The fact that the animation completely omits the forming of the forward and aft towers during the break up, and also the fact that the double bottom actually failed first... anyway, I’m just gonna stop there. I don’t wanna waste your time. Lol.
Fun fact: if the split was very clean the stern would have stayed afloat
Not sure about that. The engines weighed it down enough anyway and with it being open I think it still would have sank
Misconception. The breakup would have warped the bulkheads - regardless of being clean or not - and there were several holes that water could enter.
0:52 impossible shoe leather keel. The double bottom was rigid, and not made to flex and bend like shoe leather.
Not bad, well done! Must have been an absolute horrendous experience..it's great that you pointed out the detail of the double bottom that holds the ship together for a lil while making it accurant to the latest of theories of the breakup. Really nice! 👍👍
he didnt make the animation and also the animation is incorrect and horrendously inaccurate.
The animation is from another channel
It's from a History documentary titled: 100 year mystery solved
@@RobloxianX yes, the double bottom is yeah strong., but not that strong to carry the non-uoyant bow for that long.
0:44 man forgot to weld the ship
also
*B E N D Y F U N N E L*
I like this theory, very much, but in my opinion the kell should break off the minute the ship breaks and the 3 funnel should break off the base when the funnel falls. Besides this it’s a great video. Thanks 😃
this isnt even his video. and its horrendously inaccurate.
ive been searching for this for 3 years. or more. thanks
This would govern what both crew and passengers had to live a quiet and relaxed night became a nightmare in just two hours and 40 minutes
WW2 German veteran lost their lives 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 😢😢😢😢😢😢 😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😢😭😭😭😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😭😢😢😢😢😭😢😭😭😢😢
@@shaynewheeler9249 bruh he’s not talking about that he’s talking about this video
Save Ukraine
@@shaynewheeler9249 yessir
One of the best animations.
I love the show
I love how they use audio clips from old titanic films
This animation as far as visuals is good enough... but it’s absolutely riddled with inaccuracies and flaws.
what⁉️ i don’t see anything wrong with it‼️ this is completely accurate of what happened that night‼️
@@EricLYT it doesn't account for survivors saying it broke into several pieces, it didn't go vertical, and worst of all, the double bottom cannot hold the titanic like that, the double bottom is very brittle.
shingoji what you are saying is completely false information.
@@EricLYT it's literally supported by survivor testimonies, Read the Book On A Sea of Glass, you'll get a handful of testimonies there, I'm a Titanic enthusiast who studies the ship's sinking, and I bet I know a lot more than you do.
@@KiwiKiwf Damn straight! Also, I love your channel!
Titanic lore:
atleast we can all agree that this is better than the other one, right?
(looking at you news direct)
News direct is the worst theory ever
i agree
News direct was for illustrative purposes
history channel: gimme the worst theory you got
animators: bet **makes this**
You should see news direct
i like is the titanic shaking is
If only they got a few more lifeboat a few more passengers what have survive
It's almost look like a real time animation
How?
No
WTF I thot the stern was wayyy more risin out of the water that that
@@thorny183 I agree,
No. Real time was 2 hours and 40 minutes
It's scary 😱
POV:you are a man:GO GO GO! *the ship breaks in two* "OH FU-"
1000 Ways to Die- The Titanic Edition.
good video
its not his and its super bad.
Good video i agree
My favorite is titanic
What's the music of this video called?
😳
Theory: 100 Year Mystery Solved
Ok lets talk about the break up the double bottom could not bend like an shoe leater if that even happened stern would go down inmediatly with the bow after break up. And it could be impossible that the non-buoyant water fulled bow would not make stern go down with him.
yeah, the only possible thing is that the keel hung on the corner of the double bottom
Right now Titanic
Hello sir how much do you need me in for this weekend please let us know
The titanic noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
thats a bit too fast there slow it down a bit so the simulation not hard to understand
This is not bad, But a little inaccurate because the keel or the double bottom was not made to bend like that👍🏻
no its super inaccurate.
Titanic (1912) Titanic 2 (2022) Titanic 3 (2022)
0:41
How much money did yo get ?
Ty for 100 commit
That’s the titanic movie 1953
No that’s a night to remember 1958
@@randombelugaman both of you are wrong. both of those didnt split yet irl it did. look up a night to remember sinking. no split
I mean the shots on the ship
yes I do know I mean some of the shots on
@@randombelugaman the movie is filmed in black and white
But I like it
bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
there aint no way this roblox looking dude made this
and also the animation is wrong
the crack breaku p
The history Channel made this documentary, its literally in the title of the video
hello i'm egg titanic or titanic
Hmmm what about the boiler implosion?
@BB-61 Iowa There were no such ting. It is now known that none of the ship’s boliers exploded, and the only boilers who left their place during the sinking were the five boilers who were placed right were the Titanic split in half. But like i said, there is nothing at around the scene of the wreck which suggests that any of the ship’s boilers exploded during the sinking.
Many survivors reported that they heard one or several «explosions» from the Titanic right towards the end of the sinking, most of the survivors said they thought this loud noise came from either the boilers and/or the engines leaving their beds and went crashing down into the Titanic. But these «explosions» came in fact due to the ship breaking up.
@@patrickanderson9023 the boilers didn’t implode, the ship did. Because of the trapped air inside the stern, the air condenses as it falls lower. The air gets so compressed it implodes because of the pressure.
I HATE this animation, its not accurate and the narrator makes it SOOO ANNOYING!!!!
What? looked pretty accurate to me! What did you see that was wrong?
@@a_lbymccool1478 1. the sinking theory is from 1997 2. The bow didn't hold on to the stern by the double bottom, thats impossible, heres a video explaining why ruclips.net/video/ggu5Moi2GEM/видео.html idk the exact timestamp but i think its near the start 3. the ship way too fast. Now i get that they sped up the animation but the funnels collapse in real-time and the speed doesnt change at all doesnt change
@@dariusthesimp5943 ah
I dont necessarily hate the animation but yeah I hate it lol
@@dariusthesimp5943 I 100% agree! This theory is very similar to the James Cameron 2012 theory, which I have a lot of issues with. The theory I currently believe the most is the theory from the book On a sea of glass. That theory just adds up the most to me. This animation is, as far as visuals, is pretty well done. It’s just riddled with inaccuracies: The ships sinking is very sped up, while things like the funnele collapsing and the breakup happen in real time, the port list doesn’t eliminate itself as the bridge goes under, the two forward funnels collapsing to port instead of starboard, the stern only rising like 15 degrees out of the water as opposed to the more likely 24 to 26 degree angle, the fact of the double bottom acts like a banana peel and breaks the laws of physics in every way possible, and also the stern not going vertical before it goes down. The list just goes on and on: The fact that the animation completely omits the forming of the forward and aft towers during the break up, and also the fact that the double bottom actually failed first... anyway, I’m just gonna stop there. I don’t wanna waste your time. Lol.
WTF