Starfield PC - RX 6700XT/R7 3700X @ 1080P (Medium - Ultra Settings/FSR)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 июл 2024
- Testing with my older desktop. Game runs fine but FSR@75% resolution is necessary to average 60fps with ultra settings. This area of the game is one of the hardest to run so the frame rate will be a good bit higher in other areas. Frame rate is also 2-5fps higher when not recording.
Timestamps:
00:00 - Medium Settings/FSR Native Resolution
01:18 - High Settings/FSR Native Resolution
02:56 - Ultra Settings/FSR Native Resolution
04:36 - Ultra Settings/FSR 75% Resolution
PC: Lenovo Legion Tower 5 with upgrades
OS: Windows 11 Home
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
CPU Cooler: Deepcool Gamerstorm Castle 240EX AIO
GPU: RX 6700 XT (AsRock Challenger D)
Motherboard: Lenovo T550 (AMD B550 chipset with no XMP)
RAM: KLEVV Hynix 32GB (3200 MHz@JEDEC timings)
SSD: Samsung M.2 512GB PCI-E 4.0 NVME SSD (OS Drive)
SSD: Crucial M.2 P3 Plus 1TB NVME SSD (Game Drive)
PSU: ASUS TUF 550 watt (Bronze Rated)
Monitor: ASUS VG248QG (24inch FHD)
Should be a little bit better with my 6700Xt + 9900k. Thanks for the video
3700x and a 6700XT is roughly what a Series X is and it just proves that the game can be run at 60FPS on the Series X even if it is at 1080p. I'll take 1080p 60FPS over 4k30FPS any day.
They really should’ve put in a performance mode, I don’t know why this isn’t standard practice.
@@apostolos8734 fr. Just got my 6700XT for my gaming server. Running this game in a VM with the 6700XT and still hitting 60FPS. No excuses Todd.
what's the software that you use to track all that info? from fps to frequency to thermals. i see it a lot in benchmark videos but i never really found out what software it is
RivaTuner Statistics Server, which is included with MSI Afterburner
Why its so heavy on performance? It looks comparable to battlefront 1
Hi bro, nice video as always! I wanted to ask your opinion. In your opinion, will all the new games to come out be like this in terms of requirements and heaviness? Is it possible that my rx 6750 XT bought not even a year ago will already be old for the new releases? Or do you think this was an exception?
I have an RX 6750 XT and an R7 5800x3D, not top hardware for playing at all resolutions, but it has always given me top performance at 1080p on almost all games, and on this new game I now find myself not exceeding 55 fps
I think it's just newer games coming out with upscaling in mind. They aren't optimizing them as well at time of release. The performance will most likely improve with patches. I think you should be fine with a 6750XT at 1080 for awhile yet. Especially running it with a 5800x3D.
This needs FSR 3 very badly
Fsr is not working inly 2 fps
so I have these parts (3700x and rx 6700xt) and my main issue with the games is that I get constant stutter when walking around, more so in the cities which I understand but also is closed areas too like the wolfs den and Deimos station, and whenever I start a fight the game freezes several times and the bullets don't fire for a few seconds after. I also deal with the audio and desyncing which just ruins the immersion. Any suggestions would be gladly welcomed (FYI I'm playing the game via Xbox game pass)
Someone else commented on this video with the same issue and it turned out to be an issue with their SSD. They said installing a new one fixed the issue. Not sure how many drives you have but this computer has a drive for the OS and a separate one for games.
too much demanding... did you try this with 23.8.2 driver update or the previous one?
hopefully patches improve the performance
i dont think so even series x works 30 fps at 1440p
Yeah this is with the latest driver 23.8.2.
You need to try this card with the fx 8320. I don’t have any modern amd cards to try on my setup but your fx is pretty much matching my 10900k with a similar card. Fx performance will increase hugely if you can balance the memory, cach and ht link. They really weren’t any worse than a 2500k back in the day if you knew how to tune them. Power usage wasn’t an issue for most people then and modern coolers will easily handle them overclocked.
This test is actually with a Ryzen 7 3700X and not the FX processor. The 6700XT actually gets a little CPU bottlenecked with my 3700X in this game and some others. The FX processor would be a major bottleneck with it. My computer with the FX processor has a GTX 1650 with it because they are pretty balanced as far as performance goes.
@@craig71686 I'm literally at the bench now testing the game. I've gone from 30fps locked at 1080p low to over 50fps. I found the game runs best with 4 cores on the 10900K. The GTX 1060 hasn't gone over 85% usage yet. I can definitely squeeze more out. I think it's the 8mb cache that would hold the FX back and being stuck on DDR3 ram. I've got to put a video together of what I've done before I start playing with fast ram and timings etc.
@@theHardwareBench yeah there is the DDR3 RAM plus it only has PCI Express 2.0. Digital Foundry did discover that Starfield doesn't fully utilize Intel processors properly but it does with AMD processors. However, Hardware Unboxed found that Intel processors seem to outperform their direct AMD competition by a good margin. The game seems to be more memory sensitive. Intel processors do tend to have better memory controllers.
@@craig71686 Hardware unboxed don't know much about tuning though, their idea of overclocking is just ramping up the cores. I've got a Ryzen X570 setup on a ROG Hero board to test but with this game my guess is the operator is going to be as important as the actual hardware. PCIe 2.0 makes zero difference on cards lower power than a GTX1070ti, I've benched the slots myself, by which time the CPU is the bottleneck. I even benched a GTX1070 using the x8 slot on PCIe3 once and it pretty much made no difference. As a rule you will run out of CPU well before you run out of PCIe. Apart from Buildzoid and De8auer I don't pay much attention to anyone else's RUclips overclocking results. They are the only 2 overclockers on RUclips higher than me in the league. There are a couple of others I've actually benched LN2 with that do the odd video but they would never bench games. To them overclocking is the game.
is there a way in the game to lock FPS to 50?
I would probably recommend using Riva Tuner that comes with MSI Afterburner or AMD Chill built into the AMD Adrenalin software. There isn't any kind of FPS cap in the menu. Would have been nice for them to include one.
Just FYI, are you sure FSR2 is actually working with the rendering scale at 100%?
If you turn it on with 100% render resolution it doesn't upscale but it handles the anti-aliasing and has sharpening. It looks better than with it off. That is why I have it on.
@@craig71686 Good to know ty.
Barely hold 60fps on 1080p Medium settings, yikes. The graphics isnt that good to justified it.
This game had big problem with optimation, poor Bethesda
Have you had any "freezing"? I have same gpu/cpu/ram size + speed and installed on SSD but get, well..freezing when playing. AOC 144hz knocked down to 120hz at 1080, 1k gold corsair psu. Yes, I did just get the gpu for it came with the game. Was on a 1080ti so know very little about AMD gpus. Was curious if you had any gpu settings I could adjust or maybe I'm missing something very simple? Appreciated.
I haven't had any freezing but this machine does have a fairly fresh install of Windows 11 on it. Something you could try is Display Driver Uninstaller. It will allow you to completely wipe the old drivers off your machine. You may want to run it to remove any traces of Nvidia drivers, then the AMD ones. After that do a fresh install of the newest AMD drivers. I would recommend you watch a video on how to use it first though.
@@craig71686 I did do that prior to installing the AMD gpu to ironically avoid issues.
@@abeez85 is your RAM a matching kit? I know someone that had issues like that when going to an AMD GPU. They did a BIOS reset and it fixed it
Im having this same issue and I cant understand why, I have it installed on an SSD and I have a 6800 xt, I have the same processor as in this video, so I would of thought Id be running it at as stable as they are
@@wesleycockrill2590 are you running the game at 1080p? You would probably have more issues with stutters and stuff with a 3700X and 6800XT at 1080p because of the CPU bottleneck.
Problem with this game seems to be that it has really poor graphics scaling. Going from ultra to medium would result in a 50% performance imorovment in other games, but here its just like 20%. So the only way to save your fps if you dont have a 6800 xt for 1080p is to aggressively upscale which is what more and more game studios seem to rely on for their mess of a game
Same shit happened in Fallout 76. Surprised they never fixed it, except there for some reason your medium settings would sometimes be the high option. Good ole shitty Bethesda lmao.
Can it run crysis theme will be replaced to "can it run starfield". Damn this game is super demanding
Crysis actually looked a gen ahead of everything else. This game is just not optimized properly.
@@TheAbram099 well i woudn't say its optimised or not but the level of detail in this is game with huge world to explore is significant, sure fallout 4 skyrim may have bigger worlds but the lighting and character models in this game are miles ahead of what fo4 skyrim achieved. With that much detail added and a lot of NPC's events happening in the world, it takes a toll on the CPU and GPU.
Which setting looks the best? nd the sharpest?
The game looks the best when running FSR at 100% render resolution. The best mix of quality and performance in my opinion would be high settings with FSR at 100% resolution.
@@craig71686❤
Thanks bro have rx 6750xt with ryzen 5 5600g i'm wait similar fps xd
@@D4kR0s you're welcome.
Really strange i have R7 2700x and i cant get even 50fps average with rx 6800 card. It drops to 30fps in Atlantis, no matter if i use medium high or ultra settings....
That is because you are CPU limited. Your CPU can't keep up with the RX 6800.
@@craig71686 maybe, but per tests i watched, 3700x is almost the same. But regardless i would probably get 5700x, because x3d is too expensive.
@@milosstojanovic4623 Hardware Unboxed did a CPU performance benchmark for the game. Worth a watch if you haven't seen it. It showed that the max fps for a 2700x could reach at 1080 ultra was about 40fps and the 3700x about 50 fps. That was with a 4090 to make sure the CPU is fully stressed to show it's max performance. The 5700x should definitely be a nice performance boost.
@@craig71686 great thanks. I will definitely looking to buy cpu soon. I cant underuse this gpu, it deserves to be used at max :)
@@craig71686 You were right, that low frame rate was because of CPU. I installed 5700x and now from 35-40 in city i have 60-65 with almost everything max. Less intensive areas 100fps :D
i swear there’s barely any difference from medium to ultra
graphics is evolving, just backwards.
This game is another crap from Bethesda, but it just works.
😂
optimizasyon bad game
worst optimization ever
The last of us is laughing
@@kayzen2329the last of us is okay after that patches i have rx 6600 and i have on high with fsr quality 70 - 80 fps
@@justin-cb1kn 1080p? I hope that a patch is coming for starfield
@@MGB2408 yes i have on high 1080 fsr quality 70 - 80 fps and it looks good
Back to playing skyrim. Still bad graphics bethesda.