Yeah. It's not wood anymore. It's essentially stone. The wood become mineralised after being buried. The organic material disappeared and you're left with stone. This all depends on that it was buried.
@Ariella-mx3xq4cw6n another good point. Probably got dismantled. Really depends on how they viewed the ark, as a relic or just a tool to survive a flood.
Yes. I have Ron's original "Blue Book." Everything is in there. They were lined up with the Ark. Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. The names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter. Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man. Ron did what he was told to do and believe me, it hurt sometimes. This was no glory trip. In fact he used up a lot of money constantly going over there. Almost lost his life a few times.
Pesquisadores do Canal History chegaram a uma conclusão de que a suposta ‘Arca de Noé' nunca existiu e que o chamado 'Dilúvio' teria ocorrido somente na região do Mar Negro e, em vez da 'Arca', foram usadas para flutuação as casas dos moradores construídas em sistema de palafitas - iguais aquelas das beiras de rios no Amazonas e outras regiões do Brasil - que eram usadas na região muito propensa a alagamentos. Então as moradias eram feitas para flutuar no caso de enchentes e os animais salvos foram os animais domésticos dos moradores da área alagada. O Mar Negro, conforme amostras de lodo retiradas de seu fundo com restos de animais de água doce com sondas cilíndricas para grandes profundidades, comprovariam que o referido mar foi um lago de água doce antes de receber águas salgadas por meio do Mar de Mármara. Foram encontrados também bolsões de água doce no fundo do Mar Negro.
People will believe any lies satan puts out. I was very impressed at the level of professionalism a layperson like Ron showed through out the whole process of categorizing the durinpar site. Even today, anyone can look at the research. Any thinking, logical person can see that it is truly the ark.
Ron Wyatt did scientific research on the 'ark shaped like structure'. Ron and the top geologist in turkey did a deep investigation on this site. They used sensitive seismic and sounding equipment to conclusively determine that yes, this was a ship and yes, it is as old as the flood. Ron also found burial sites of Noah and his wife. The remains are in a museum in turkey. Turkey was so sure that this was the historical site of a very very old boat that slid down the mountain with a glacier, then was covered up which petrified the wood. They designated it as a national park. There is a book categorizing all of the factual scientific evidences. You should do better research. Unless you did, and know that you are being deceptive.
They Turkish government says it is?! HahAHAHHahah. Come on. Where is the scientific review? Where is the publically submitted papers? They dont exist because this was all BS @@Jans8021
seriously? Oh dear... So i guess there is a global conspiracy to keep this amazing find under wraps? Please advise on the facts you have that supports that theory. I am really interested.
@@Dat_1REB i remember the guy in the interview said when they checked the measurements they initially thought it was done in hebrew language which didnt match then they realised it was done in egyptian since moses was eductated there and it matched.. so im confused with this presentation
You Cant explain away the gigantic anchor stones. Carvings with eight figures on it.. A god of love leaving artifacts behind like the burial headdress and the shroud. Blood matches Only the chromosomes of a woman. Sadly the world has been over vaccinated dumbed down no common sense and preoccupied by 400 channels of garbage
Pesquisadores do Canal History chegaram a uma conclusão de que a suposta ‘Arca de Noé' nunca existiu e que o chamado 'Dilúvio' teria ocorrido somente na região do Mar Negro e, em vez da 'Arca', foram usadas para flutuação as casas dos moradores construídas em sistema de palafitas - iguais aquelas das beiras de rios no Amazonas e outras regiões do Brasil - que eram usadas na região muito propensa a alagamentos. Então as moradias eram feitas para flutuar no caso de enchentes e os animais salvos foram os animais domésticos dos moradores da área alagada. O Mar Negro, conforme amostras de lodo retiradas de seu fundo com restos de animais de água doce com sondas cilíndricas para grandes profundidades, comprovariam que o referido mar foi um lago de água doce antes de receber águas salgadas por meio do Mar de Mármara. Foram encontrados também bolsões de água doce no fundo do Mar Negro.
Then you are easily conned. The Durupinar site is a natural rock formation. Even AIG admitted Wyatt was a fraud. The so called anchor stones are carved from the local volcanic rock, not from Mesopotamia and are pagan in nature, with later carvings made by Christians.
@@paulrobinson2604 , That Wyatt’s findings didn’t make worldwide headlines should be a clue to you. He is no more credible than Indiana Jones, but believe in your fantasy if you like.
This video is a load of tosh! The presenter is totally ignorant of the details of Ron Wyatt's findings on the Duprinar site and the ongoing archaeology discoveries as recent as September 2023. Methinks there is a considerable amount of religious and archaeological jealousy being brought to bear on this site by the so-called expert ignoramuses. Christianity in general is appalled that God would choose Ron Wyatt, a Seventh Day Adventist of all things. to uncover many of the sites relating to the Genesis accounts of His chosen people.
For three years in the early 50's, my folks resided in Laurelwood, OR....which is primarily a Seventh Day Adventist community 30 miles SW of Portland, and is the only time my religious folks didn't attend some 'brand' of church, dragging we five kids along, of which I was the eldest. For three years, three of we five walked a full two miles to a small one room schoolhouse, where one teacher valiently tried teaching a wide variety of subjects to about 25 students, where my Enguish suffered and plauged me all ot the way into college. When I realized I was going to have to repeat Bonehead Enguish for a third time, I finally buckled down and 'got it', even somewhere along the way, learning to correctly spell English! About seven weeks prior to the end of the school year, my folks moved on to another town to be closer to where my mother worked, while I elected to stay with an older couple so I could finish the 7th grade. While I was there, this couple forced me to attend thier sh*tty SDA church, which I fully credit with sewing the initial seeds of the atheist I morphed into and now at age 84, remain so to this very day. BHE
Ron Wyatt found Noah's Ark. The Turkish government has confirmed this. The Turkish locals who have lived in the area their whole lives have always known the Durupinar site to be Noah's Ark even before Ron Wyatt made claims to the world about it. Plenty of scientific research has been done on Noah's Ark and books have been written on the subject (The Noah's Ark Book by Vance Ferrell and Discovering GOD's treasures by Kevin Fisher). Why does the Ark encounter deny all of these facts? Show everyone the scientific research the Ark Encounter has done at the site so we can compare it with the extensive research Ron Wyatt and others have done over decades. GOD has preserved Noah's Ark for future generations of skeptics such as ours. Ron Wyatt was used by GOD to not only find Noah's Ark but the Red Sea Crossing site, Sodom and Gomorrah, and the Ark of the Covenant. GOD chose Ron Wyatt to find these things because he was a faithful Christian who kept ALL 10 of GOD's Commandments including the Sabbath (Ecclesiastes 12:13). Again GOD has preserved the Ark and all the the other discoveries as a wake up call to our generation here at the end of time to show that the Bible is true and all of the great stories in Genesis, which is the foundation of the Bible, are true historical accounts. May GOD bless each and everyone of you as you study HIS Word!
We @4425 CR388 AL. Are OPEN HOSTAGES OF corrupt USMS PD AND SHERIFF CHILD TRAFFICKERS IN THE 36854 area NO DECENT HUMAN INVESTIGATING AT ALL!!!! DON'T SEND ANY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AT ALL!!! My neighbors are sadistic demented serial killers blood related to the CORRUPTION!!! Send info IMMEDIATLY TODAY TO FBI DOJ IMMEDIATELY. NO EMAILS NO CALLS NO COMMENTS SEND IMMEDIATE RESCUE TODAY
Ah yes, the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. How much is a ticket?? Why, if this is such a wonderful way to spread the gospel, do they need to charge? The scripture says to give freely what has been given to you from above. Which means, if you charge for it, it is not of God.
@@--..-...-..-.--.... That rock formation is the wrong shape. It was not a boat it was not going anywhere. All it had to do was float. Plus the actual ark was seasoned waterproof wood. It would have been used by the Noah clan for everything they needed to restart life and survive.
@--..-...-..-.--....methinks thou doth protest too much. Calm your hormones. Ron Wyatt did impeccable research and categorizing of the ark site in turkey. It is all available to analyze. But I don't think you are looking for truth, just something to hyperventilate about.
There is the little detail that in 1987, Turkey has recognised this as Noah's Ark. They even built a visitors Center, paved a road to it, and designated it as Noah’s Ark National Park. So...other than that? There is no credible proof.
@@TravelingInFaith If you mean the park and visitors center, sure, why not? The boat shaped object has been known about for at least a hundred years when it was photographed from an airplane. So, no it was not just built.
I have Ron's original "Blue Book." Everything is in there. They were lined up with the Ark. Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. The names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter. Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man. Ron did what he was told to do and believe me, it hurt sometimes. This was no glory trip. In fact he used up a lot of money constantly going over there. Almost lost his life a few times.
@@blueeyedsoulman Ron Wyatt was a grifter who hustled businessmen and television producers to invest money into Wyatt Archaeological Research for film rights. There were many thousands of dollars invested in WAR. None of those who invested this money ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence substantiating Wyatt's claims. Where is an actual professional lab report regarding the blood sample analysis of what Ron claims is the blood of Jesus Christ? Where is the Ark of the Covenant? Which museum is housing the ancient chariot wheels he claimed to have been from the Red Sea Crossing? There is no evidence because Wyatt's videos are a fraud. One of the major warning signs of pseudo-archaeology includes discoveries pitched directly to the media. The pseudo-archaeologist knows his or her claim will not stand up to scrutiny by actual archaeologists nor would it ever pass the scrutiny of peer review, so it gets pitched directly to the media.
Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. What about the names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter? Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man.
Pesquisadores do Canal History chegaram a uma conclusão de que a suposta ‘Arca de Noé' nunca existiu e que o chamado 'Dilúvio' teria ocorrido somente na região do Mar Negro e, em vez da 'Arca', foram usadas para flutuação as casas dos moradores construídas em sistema de palafitas - iguais aquelas das beiras de rios no Amazonas e outras regiões do Brasil - que eram usadas na região muito propensa a alagamentos. Então as moradias eram feitas para flutuar no caso de enchentes e os animais salvos foram os animais domésticos dos moradores da área alagada. O Mar Negro, conforme amostras de lodo retiradas de seu fundo com restos de animais de água doce com sondas cilíndricas para grandes profundidades, comprovariam que o referido mar foi um lago de água doce antes de receber águas salgadas por meio do Mar de Mármara. Foram encontrados também bolsões de água doce no fundo do Mar Negro.
Yeah- who needs proof when you have your trusty faith? Let’s believe a ridiculous story clearly written by man as true and dedicate our lives to this fictional character without a single shred of proof or evidence.
Faith is simply the belief in something without having any facts or evidence to support ones belief. I see faith as a dangerous component in the human mind. It allows one to really believe whatever they want to. Similar to the circular argujments that the bible proves the bible. Those devout followers see thier very faith as proof of whatever they believe- strengthening that faith even more. They allow themselves to believe utterly idiotic ideas with faith as the lense. They so trust thier faith that they want to shove it down other's throats. @@donaldgeterjr8180
If you don't believe in what this man is portraying, don't comment on it. It's not just rude, but it's stupid, to comment on something you like and enjoy. It's rude to the people who do believe in God and the global catastrophe.
Nonsense. As any professional geologist would tell you that natural rock formation in Turkey, which is frequently misidentified as a boat, is nothing more than a doubly plunging syncline. Additionally, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
The durupinar site is definitely the ark, regardless of the "similar geological" formations nearby. The durupinar site matches the dimensions of the ark to a "T" and ground penetrating radar has found parallel lines and man made structures underneath. None of those are naturally occurring on their own, there was so much evidence of structures beneath the ground such as lines, rooms and 90° angles that it's a no brainer at this point. The Ark was made of Gopher wood is apparently laminated wood which is much more resistant to decay.
Faith is the opposite of science, yet it's also one common element that you will always hear valued in religion. It's the number one most common excuse for holding peculiar superstitious beliefs in spite of the evidence against them, their violations of sense, and their foundation in wishful thinking and rhetorical vapor - it puts ignorance on a pedestal. Also, and professional geologist would recognize that natural rock formation as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more. As for Ron Wyatt, he was a hustler who snookered businessmen and TV producers into investing cash into his enterprises in return for film rights, but no one who invested that cash ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence supporting Wyatt's claims because all of his videos were carefully constructed frauds - even his wife now admits he was a fraudster.
Ron Wyatt's group performed some core sampling, and in one, they found a piece of antler, a bit of aluminum, yes, long before aluminum was ever discovered, and if I remember correctly, an iron rivet. I saw that on a video probably 8 years ago. How far away are the anchor stones from Wyatts site? Wern't they found close by?
Yes. I have Ron's original "Blue Book." Everything is in there. They were lined up with the Ark. Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. The names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter. Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man. Ron did what he was told to do and believe me, it hurt sometimes. This was no glory trip. In fact he used up a lot of money constantly going over there. Almost lost his life a few times.
@@sjl197 With Ron it was almost 40 years ago. I'm 58. Ron often got information (like downloads) directly from the Lord. He often prayed and got directions such as turn left here, put a pile of marker stones over there, dig over here etc. Many times the people ruling over those areas would just give him the ability to dig and demonstrate. This is true with Egypt, Turkey and even SA although that was a series of the craziest miracles. He said his discoveries would be covered over and it was part of what the Lord was doing. Not just Noah's Ark but dozens of things like S&G, the Red Sea crossing etc. He said these things were being protected to be used at a later date in the end times. They were only known at the time by a select few. Even though there was a 60 minutes episode where this was shown it wasn't what most people were prepared to except. In the last days of the rebellion no one will be without excuse. There will even be angels warning people to repent immediately. Everything will be shown and no one will be excused. In the end you're either saved or you're not. Let's face it, mankind is just full of lies. You have to have the Holy Spirit to SHOW you the kingdom of heaven. Did anyone bother to see the Revelation 12 sign appear in the heavens? It's an astronomical fact as plain as day. It's the final hour. It will begin shortly. No one can stop what's coming. BTW 2033 marks 2000 years exactly since the Lord blasted out of that tomb/ cave. Jesus blood covering your sins is the only way to live on, forever.
@@blueeyedsoulman ok, so you’re sounding like you know the divine truth, you know the future and Wyatt received information like “downloads”. Please keep these baseless and insane views away from me.
@@sjl197 The only thing YOU need to know is Jesus loves you and his blood can save you if you repent of your personal sin and accept Jesus as saviour and Lord. This is not a salvation issue. I will say what I experienced as I please.
You know what’s really annoying is when they come up with reasonable things to account for it by just looking at it dig it up then just dig stop thinking about it and get your hands dirty
@@JOinLC351 I don't get why you were watching this in the first place. I know you don't believe that this exist but it doesn't make sense that you try to discourage people of their beliefs. Have some respect.
Exactly. As any professional geologist would tell you that natural rock formation in Turkey, which is frequently misidentified as a boat, is nothing more than a doubly plunging syncline. Additionally, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
did noah make sure he had a pair of binturongs in there? i don't recall seeing any in the ark encounter commercials.. my point is that thing could NOT have held a pair of EVERY animal on earth.
5:32 - MY EDUCATED GUESS IS THAT IT LANDED IN THE ARARAT MOUNTAINS, BUT FINALLY RESTED MILES AWAY ON MOUNT JUDI. AFTER WATER LEVELS KEPT DECLINING OR GLACIERS STOPPED MOVING. IT CURRENTLT RESIDES ON MOUNT JUDI IN TURKEY. SO, ACTUALLY BOTH ARE TRUE. ARARAT AND JUDI BOTH WELCOMED THE ARK.
Hey "Answers" in Genesis...I got lot's of questions. Like why don't you give any of the real evidence from the Durupinar area? Like the stones from the ark all around it.
@@Jewonastick Yes, it's called the people who were there and saw the miracles that happened every time. If you don't have the faith to believe that, don't worry about it. It's not a salvation issue. Make sure you have the blood of Christ covering your sins. As for those of us who new Ron. Maybe it was just supposed to be a small circle who realized the truth. EVERYTHING is available. You just have to want to see it really badly and God has to open the doors for you to see it. But trust me, the faithless can have a miracle right in front of them and they won't even see it. Satan is really trying hard to mock the things of the Lord. All WILL be revealed.
@estok918 Just like you have NO evidence for evolution. It's a religion. It takes much mire faith to believe in that BS than to just give God the credit. 📖
Why does Snelling make statements supporting a young Earth and than write science papers completely contradicting his young Earth claims? He can't have it both ways.
There are many rock formations like the Durupinar site where there are rock ‘spines’ that lay against hills like this one. The one here is conventionally boat shaped, the Ark was more likely box shaped, as the name Ark implies.
The Ark was made of seasoned wood. It was waterproof. It had a second function. It would take approximately 30-40 years for trees to grow, maybe longer. It would be a good source of wood for houses, animal shelters, barns for food from the Ark until the land regrew. fencing to protect the domestic animals. The ark would have sank into the wet soils where it landed. There would be a shape of the Ark in the sediment which dries into rock but the wood would eventually have been used..
There are innumerable structures of the ancient world made of rock, tiny, small, large and huge structures. Wood is nice but not needed. There are trees that grow extremely fast,
@@saywhat8966 Your imagination seems to be lacking. A worldwide flood had just happened. It made the rocks along with volcanoes, ouch hot. First find your suitable rocks! Or die waiting for it to set. cool, or the trees to grow. What is easier trying to dig out rocks or remove a ready made source of waterproof, seasoned wood? I know what I'd do. It seems man had more intelligence then, than a lot of people today.
If we read scripture we see that destruction of all flesh is what was destroyed. We also know that many lands have been flooded and still have standing timber. Logs are still harvested from under water from many years ago. "Genesis 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die." "Genesis 7:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 7:22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark. 7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days."
@@JOinLC351 probably there were landbridges after the breakup into the continents with the flood (the underground fountains opened accoring to the bible)
Looks like a natural rock formation to me I would think that Noah would have dismantled the ark to make his Vineyard and to build his home rather than leave it to not use.
Can’t say would don’t survive that long because it was made from gopherwood that’s no longer on earth so you don’t know how long that type of wood lasted so doubtful
Your biggest issue is belief. You don't even need that, look at the laboratory tests that were done on the durinpar site. Go to the historical site in turkey. Take off your preconceived fallacies handed to you to keep you enslaved and you will see.
What's with everyone using Ron Wyatt as a reference?. Ron was never an Archeologist and has had all his worked critisised by professionals in different fields. He claimed to have found over 100 biblical sites in his lifetime and sold books on it all. He played you all.
Ron said it would be used at the time of the end as testimony against the unbelievers. Just as Satan has a purpose so does the evidence. It's not about believers although I enjoyed it. It's God's property to do as he pleases with. Satan is also God's property to do as he pleases with and that just drives him nuts because there is no Gospel of Salvation for fallen angels or demons. Only human beings have a way out.
It seems so silly to me that modern man tries to make their version of the ark as a big square box from modern timber style building materials. When God design it with curved reeds and pitch-a catamaran type ship with an bottom opening down the middle which allowed the natural wave movement to 'pump' fresh air in and out of the small opening at the center of the top of the roof.
I 100% agree that Ron Wyatt found the Ark. The proof is in his documentary. People dont want to recognize it because he was a 7th day adventist. But I truly believe God used him. Why should we believe your claims that the earth is only thousands of years old?
Flavius Josephus wrote that the Ark was still visible in his time, and people made pilgrimages to it, chipping off pieces to make amulets. It wouldn't last to our day if people were chipping away at it.
Faith is the opposite of science, yet it's also one common element that you will always hear valued in religion. It's the number one most common excuse for holding peculiar superstitious beliefs in spite of the evidence against them, their violations of sense, and their foundation in wishful thinking and rhetorical vapor - it puts ignorance on a pedestal.
@@plainsman faith is the key component of science. You have to put faith in the idea that the world is understandable first, or you wouldn't even try to persue science by observation. You have confidence in science. Confidence is straight Latin, meaning "with faith". It is only because God upholds His creation that you don't see new life popping into existence, or camels having puppies, or the earth falling into the sun. Any person who hasn't read the Bible can't be considered to have any education at all, and that's one reason why so many interpretations of data in the scientific literature are debunked within a few years, sometimes in only months. If you put all your faith in man, you will always be disappointed. You will be led to cognitive dissonance by greedy, grant hungry, ambitious men and women who have no reason to tell you the truth, because they rebel against God's moral standard. When you believe that man's word has the authority over the unchanging Word of God, you become a pawn in the hands of the most dissolute deceivers in power. Repent and follow Jesus Christ, to have eternal life. Your life in this world is so brief, it's an eye blink. You will die. Thousands of people die everyday. You don't know the hour of your demise. You could die tonight. If you put your faith and trust in Jesus, you will never die. You will have eternal life.
This was a waste of time video with no evidence other than some "experts" say it isn't there. I would expect far more from the Ark Encounter. Lost some respect for the lack of proof claims. There are educated experts who say the flood never happened; I don't go make a click bait negative video with no proof with their claims. Humble arrogance in this guy.
Did you folks check Mount Cudi / Judi in the Zagros mountains in Turkey? The place of 'descent' for Noah. There appears to be remains of an archaeological city on Google Maps hiding out here in the mountain that nobody seems to have marked as a landmark. I'd be willing to bet this is where Noah was either coming from or ended up after the flood. It would have been A water source for the Tigris....for which Mari might have been blamed / attacked by Akkadians for stealing water from the surrounding region after they built agricultural up on the mountain and redirected that water from the Tigris.....
I know AIG have good intentions, but just as they are skeptical of these findings im skeptical of a lot of their ideas. They think God created sun, moon and stars on day 4 when scripture plainly says God created Heaven (sun, moon, planets and stars) and earth in the beginning, orbday one.
Yeah, they have so many things they totally miss the mark on. But we are all imperfect. I just balk at the arrogance and flippant manner they gloss over facts and make logical fallacies.
I am guessing your are choosing to pretend that the Bible includes passages where the sun's motion is mentioned, in a way which seemingly contradicts the heliocentric model? The Bible indicates a geocentric model just like the people of the time believed. Isn’t that interesting?
"Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." The Heaven being the cosmos is mentioned first does not contradict but our perception might. "Genesis 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light." What was this light? Many say it was God's light, but God was light from the beginning. So, the light must have been what we know to be stars. And if "Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.", so would the Cosmos be. And, "Genesis 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:", God did not recreate them here but put them in place. "Job 9:8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea." The Earth seems to be the center of attention because you and I are the center of His attention. When we allow God to be the center of our attention we might see things a lot differently.
Well you showed other examples of possible locations but none of them come close to the dimensions or descriptions.. The boat would have landed on a mountain and not under one on a plain, if everything was flooded he would have to dock it at a mountain. Also the dimesions given to that mountain outcrop are accurate in L/W within 10 metres, which is still alot but cubits as a measurment is not accurate anyway.
It behooves Christians to be skeptical of "things" until something verifiable emerges. The FACT is that the pattern of the "anchor stones" lends creedence to the Durupinar site as related elements. I really can't get excited about claims concerning a 16,000ft mountain. Poor planning by the architect of the mission, for sure! BUT, Jesus said that the last days "will be LIKE the days of Noah." Check! I can easily see history looking back saying, "HOW could they have been so STUPID!" If these times weren't so terrible, it would truely be something to laugh at. But EVERYBODY"S got a nuke! Ezekiel 38 and 39, Zechariah 14, Revelation 9 and 20! Genghis Khan has his modern day pretenders. What if Churchill had just retreated in shame from Gallipoli?
why everyone just focus on mount arart when the book of genesis clearly stated the its restint on the Mountants of ararat Not the the mountain ararat so its talking about geological area call ararat with more then one mountain besises arat mountain was to dangerous for god to landed his survivor in ararat mountan even for some annimal to get kill to go down noah say the land was dry must be a lower mountain that was resting;
@@me-yc9gr Any reputable geologist knows perfectly well that the natural rock structure near Dogubayazit, Turkey, has been repeatedly misidentified as Noah's Ark. Microscopic studies of a supposed iron bracket show that it is derived from weathered volcanic minerals. Supposed metal-braced walls are natural concentrations of limonite and magnetite in steeply inclined sedimentary layers in the limbs of a doubly plunging syncline. Supposed fossilized gopherwood bark is crinkled metamorphosed peridotite. Fossiliferous limestone, interpreted as cross cutting the syncline, preclude the structure from being Noah's Ark because these supposed "Flood" deposits are younger than the "Ark." Alleged anchor stones at Kazan are derived from local andesite and NOT from Mesopotamia. Only science illiterates would be gullible enough to ignore this reality.
@@me-yc9grThere was never any bolts or timber found. Wood would have rotted centuries ago, and bronze and iron weren't even invented yet at the alleged time of Noah.
I find this presentation interesting, however, there are some variables you left out, which I will mention. I am in no way an expert; merely someone who has researched this and other topics for over 40 yrs. 1. Scripture tells us the process of events as the water subsided and it could not have settled on a low lying region because Noah sent out 3 different birds about a week apart to determine if land/vegetation was showing and/or growing back. Since the first and second bird exploration was unsuccessful, it would infer that no other land was viable apart from their immediate high area, thus they were not below the 7 - 9,000 ft marker. 2. When the flood waters was swirling debris around, and buildup began, who's to say that it didn't happen by the providence of God to prepare a place for the ark to settle into... high up above any and all mountain ridges? As the waters subsided, the sediment was still swirling about in the lower regions and creating layers upon layers until the earth's surface dried up sufficiently to move about on. 3. There are many examples where people made shrines for supposedly holy sites, but that does not mean they are holy ones. Case in point: The location that Constantine's mother decided was the place where Jesus was crucified and then buried is just traditional thinking. Scripture gives us plain clues about it's locations, just as we do with the ark of Noah. After leaving the ark, his family could have migrated to the place where some claim is the place that the eight people came out of the ark at and lived. Speculation. 4. There have been several credible eye witnesses that testify that the ark is on the mountain which you say is a volcano. So what if it is/was one, that does not negate the possibility of the ark being there preserved by God and the holy angels for a time when it may finally be revealed so that people will have one more reason to believe in Holy Writ. The way the ark was made would have withstood a lot of abuse. However, due to its age, that when the mountain erupted and tore 1/6th of the mountain away, the Ahora Gorge was formed, but the ark merely broke into at least two segments straddling the gorge. George Hagopian returned to the ark on Ararat a few years after his first encounter with his uncle and saw the ark still where he last saw it. It is usually during a very warm season that the ark was detected and visited regularly by the natives in Armenia who have sworn to protect it. IMHO, the reason most do not see it is because almost year round snow and ice cover that region at the top. 5. That formation Ron Wyatt called Noah's ark was, as some have surmised, to be a natural occurrence when mud or lava comes to an outcropping and it moves around it, creating a boat-like formation... as you discussed. It is only a boat-like shape and as you mentioned, there are various other areas that have similar formations, but they aren't THE ark. Some say Wyatt's team found samples of various materials at that site, but such items infer it is merely segments of a structure that held whatever it was in place instead of it being a barge which the ark was. Also, the ark would not need anchor stones or a keel, because they would keep the people inside from depending and trusting on God's providential hand to guide and protect them in the storm. You are correct in saying that we don't need the ark to know the flood occurred, since there is an overwhelming amount of evidence to prove it came upon all living flesh and that the place in Glen Rose, Texas proves that dinosaurs and man existed simultaneously for a time leading up to the flood.
All of your points are terribly dependent on the scriptures being real and accurate or simply downright wrong. glen rose does not prove your funny theory at all. The tracks were laid at completely separate times and do not indicate man lived with dinosaurs. Finally, the vast majority of physical evidence shows that there was NO global flood even as described in the Bible. That is the facts.
God, the creator of all that exists, that destroyed all but Noah and his family is able to preserve wood under any condition He chooses. He IS a supernatural being with sovereign power over all that He created.
@@jaredolar9879 that is true. It's definitely not doctrinally essential but it's quite interesting. There is certainly an abundance of other archeological finds that also attest to the historical accuracy of God's Word.
That is absolutely false. It is not tied to death. It is used for anything that god may do. William Cowper first penned what would become the source of this phrase 250 years ago and it had nothing to do with death. You need to study more my friend and stop pretending like you know what you are talking about because you clearly do not. @@timspiker
Why would anyone think that Noah's ark would ever be found? Did anyone ever think that after the flood, that Noah and his family disassembled the ark to use the wood to build from? God is not wasteful.. So instead of using the wood for their new homes, they started cutting down water logged trees?
I’m aware this is not the point you are trying to make, but I read this in my Bible tonight actually- they used hardened dirt/clay to build after the flood! Genesis 11! Again- this is nit picky haha but I got excited because I read it earlier tonight!
If wood wouldn't survive, why would you be saying that "no wood materials were found? Also, you didn't address the 3D images that were found from geothermal imaging at the ark site that show 90 degree angles and parallel lines, appearing to be rooms. Found I believe in 2021.
Dose the name of area not ring anny bells? Ararat Hebrew: Urartu Assyrian. Mountains Great Wall The mesurments? 300 Cubits long 50 Cubits wide 30 Cubits High Royal Egyptian Cubit= 52.34cm 300x 52.34cm =157m? 515ft =156.972m long? 50x 52.34cm = 26.17m wide 30x 52.34cm =15.7m high Shape and mesurments look right for me. Please remember not all people on earth can see 3D vision. There is people believing in Flate Earth Dome stuff. I have seen Mr Ron Wyatt video as a young boy. And watched it 20 years later. I have very mutch experiance in Boat racing. Earth moving and ENGINEERING DESIGN. I CAN STILL SEE THE IMAGE AS A GIANT VESSEL SHAPE. WIL DRILLING TUNNELS HORIZONTAL I HAVE SEEN PETRIPHIDE WOOD DRILLING CUTTING LOGS. I CAN SEE MR Wyatt GAVE HIS FULL COMMITMENT TO FIND CREATIONS OF THE PAST.
Stop using a corrupt version of Gods Word.....Get a 1611 King James Bible the preserved word of God.....unreal exactly why I dont sub to this channel.......Easy...
Nope, no actual geology was used, quoted, or even shown. Just some rando guy flapping his lips. There WAS actual geology done at the ark site in turkey. They have a museum there with all of the research, excavation, sounding, and testimony from the top historian in turkey that helped Ron.
@@JOinLC351 It's best when the two meet. Science doesn't have an answer for cell creation funnily, you can look it up. Scholars just claim to know, but when you ask them to recreate a cell in a lab they can't do it. That's because we have no clue on how to create life other than... the obvious.
What should keep every viewer from reporting this as spam or misleading, based on the title and thumbnail? Deception is the first and foremost sin in the Bible.
If they want to find the ark they need to look further north in the Caucasian mountains. I've never believed this site was Noah's ark. Not even if they did cannibalize parts of the ark to build the early shelters after the flood.
They found rivets and fossilized wood. A mile up is where the hull is and the theory is a volcano ripped the boat in two and carried it down the mountain and destroyed it and what remains was fossilized. Maybe try watching the actual documentary about what they found vs just saying its not real.
I can’t wait to ask God if that is the site or not. So much controversy over the site. Wyatt was a delusional fanatic. I would listen to anyone else’s opinion other than his.
The claim that Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's Ark is not supported by scientific evidence or widely accepted by experts in the field of archaeology or geology. Ron Wyatt was an amateur archaeologist who made several controversial claims about discovering various biblical artifacts, including Noah's Ark, the Ark of the Covenant, and other biblical sites. Here are some reasons why Ron Wyatt's claims are not widely accepted by the archaeological and scientific communities: Lack of Scientific Evidence: There is no scientific or archaeological evidence to support Ron Wyatt's claims. Archaeological discoveries are typically subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny, peer review, and verification, which his claims did not undergo. Inconsistent Claims: Ron Wyatt's claims about the location of Noah's Ark have shifted over time, and his descriptions of the site have been inconsistent. This raises doubts about the accuracy of his accounts. Absence of Peer Review: Real archaeological discoveries are subject to peer review by experts in the field. Ron Wyatt's claims were not subjected to this rigorous process, which is a standard practice in the scientific community. Lack of Credible Witnesses: Wyatt's claims often relied on his own testimony without credible witnesses or experts to corroborate his findings. Commercial Interests: Ron Wyatt's expeditions and claims were associated with commercial ventures, including selling videos and books related to his discoveries. This can raise questions about potential financial motives. Religious Bias: Some of Ron Wyatt's claims were strongly tied to his religious beliefs, which could have influenced his interpretations and findings. It's important to approach claims about archaeological discoveries critically and with a healthy dose of skepticism, especially when they lack scientific validation and consensus within the academic community. While the search for biblical artifacts is of interest to many people, it should be conducted using rigorous scientific methods and standards. To support claims of archaeological discoveries, it is essential to rely on peer-reviewed research, credible experts, and physical evidence that can withstand scrutiny by the wider scientific community. Claims that lack these elements should be viewed with caution and skepticism.
I found the first mesurment unit. Water Wasser stoff H2O!! 1 ROYAL FINGER IS ONE WATER DROPLET 1CM DIAMETER 10mm 52.36cm cubit is 1:6 of 1m diameter circle piece. Circumpherne of 1000mm circle OD x PI 3.1415= 3141.5mm is ÷6= 523,6mm ? Royal finger 1cm Royal hand 10cm Royal Leg 100cm Royal cubit 52.36cm volum mesure in length Golden Ratio 1: 1.618 Groth of natural flow
Come on people… the archeological record does not support a global flood as described in the Bible. That makes the whole Noah story just that- a fricken story. Haven’t all the logistic impossibilities killed this for you yet? So tired
The geological record: Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the earth. There really was a worldwide flood. We have three decks of exhibits at the Ark Encounter that show the logistics were possible.
@@arkencounter Actually that's because the dirt near water has the proper density to preserve corpses, like silt or clay for example keep the bones intact. But that doesn't discredit the bible. When you dig deep enough you'll find a layer of clay that can be found over the whole planet, suggesting the entire planet at one point was covered with water. There's also instances of human foot prints found next to dino foot prints in the same material. Suggesting that humanity is possibly much older than modern teachings suggest or perhaps that dinos were not wiped out by an asteroid but a flood. You can even find old cave paintings of humans riding dinos from a time where our history teachings suggest there shouldn't have been dinos or people knowing what dinos are. This suggests that men indeed walked with giants, just not the type of giants we think of when we say "giant". Could be because actual fairy tails were created on purpose to discredit the bible. There's been many wars against religion and propaganda is a form of warfare too. Info wars.
@@arkencounter AHHahaha! In spite of Ken Ham’s best efforts to show otherwise, by building his ark he demonstrated the hyperbole in the Flood story. Yes, he succeeded in building an ark the dimensions of Noah’s ark (510 feet long). As I look at the online video of the construction, though, I noticed all of the cranes, the metal scaffolding that keeps the structure from collapsing, the power tools, and last but not least the many, many skilled craftsmen and craftswomen who are built this large boat. I end up asking myself, could Noah and his family have built an ark of this dimension by themselves using only primitive tools? Let’s remember too that the time of Noah is well before the manufacture of iron, bronze, or cooper tools. I think the answer to that question is a decided “no”.
Yes, he even put it into an easy to read book. All the impeccable research and categorizing he and the turkey nationals did is laid out for all to see. But one needs to work a little bit at getting it, so most won't bother. This is why Yah says: it is the GLORY of Yah to conceal a matter and the HONOR of kings (and priests, and women kings aka queens) to search the matter out.
Ron Wyatt was a hustler who snookered businessmen and TV producers into investing cash into his enterprises in return for film rights, but no one who invested that cash ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence supporting Wyatt's claims because all of his videos were carefully constructed frauds - even his wife now admits he was a fraudster.
Lack of building materials after the Flood. 🤔NO new trees yet for lumber, they would have used the materials of the ARK for the construction of their new homes. 😂You would think a company that built a wooden ark would have thought about that.🤣Do better.
some trees float. like cedar. there would be plenty of non rotted wood they could use. and who says they had to use wood? they could use clay, rock, ect.
There are stone structures at the durinpar site in turkey dates to the time of the flood. Funny thing is, they are all built for 8-9 foot people. Another funny thing is, the graves that Ron found at the site had bones of a 9 foot man and a slightly smaller woman. The remains are in a museum in turkey.
"How can you find something that never existed?" So you don't believe the ark existed? Interesting. So in your opinion where did the name Egypt come from?
@@davidgardner863 "What does that have to do with anything?" It has a lot to do with the ark, it's just you haven't read the Bible and understood it. So again - where did the name Egypt come from? Know that, and you'll know the ark is true.
So do you want your "Ark" to be the only Ark in existence? I guess the real one would put yours to shame. Are you really religious or just use the Ark as a money maker?
When the floodwaters reached 14 cubits above the highest mountains into the death zone the oxygen ran out and the temperature plummeted well below zero. How did the animals, plants, insects and humans survive inside the Ark? Answer: They didn't.
If they didn't survive, you would not be saying they didn't, because the world would be devoid of humans and animals. Geology all over the world proves there was a flood. Rocks do not bend. Polystrate fossils would be non existent. Carbon 14 proves anything with carbon 14 in it, can not be more than between 100,000 and 200,000 old. because of its half life. It's so unreliable that's why there is a discrepancy in the dates. That rules out billions of years on its own.
“Why would we expect for this large wooden vessel to survive in the elements?” Ever heard of petrified wood?😂
Yeah. It's not wood anymore. It's essentially stone. The wood become mineralised after being buried. The organic material disappeared and you're left with stone. This all depends on that it was buried.
@@Ash.Attack a world wide flood. No mature trees. Would you let that seasoned wood go to waste?
@Ariella-mx3xq4cw6n another good point. Probably got dismantled. Really depends on how they viewed the ark, as a relic or just a tool to survive a flood.
@@Ariella-mx3xq4cw6n how do you know the trees were gone the last bird noah let out came back with a tree leaf
Read your Bible after the flood Noah’s family went separate ways!
I do believe they found the anchor stones and that the ark would be close to there
Yes. I have Ron's original "Blue Book." Everything is in there. They were lined up with the Ark. Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. The names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter. Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man. Ron did what he was told to do and believe me, it hurt sometimes. This was no glory trip. In fact he used up a lot of money constantly going over there. Almost lost his life a few times.
God's bloodlust is infinite. As proven by the Noah story
Pesquisadores do Canal History chegaram a uma conclusão de que a suposta ‘Arca de Noé' nunca existiu e que o chamado 'Dilúvio' teria ocorrido somente na região do Mar Negro e, em vez da 'Arca', foram usadas para flutuação as casas dos moradores construídas em sistema de palafitas - iguais aquelas das beiras de rios no Amazonas e outras regiões do Brasil - que eram usadas na região muito propensa a alagamentos. Então as moradias eram feitas para flutuar no caso de enchentes e os animais salvos foram os animais domésticos dos moradores da área alagada. O Mar Negro, conforme amostras de lodo retiradas de seu fundo com restos de animais de água doce com sondas cilíndricas para grandes profundidades, comprovariam que o referido mar foi um lago de água doce antes de receber águas salgadas por meio do Mar de Mármara. Foram encontrados também bolsões de água doce no fundo do Mar Negro.
People will believe any lies satan puts out. I was very impressed at the level of professionalism a layperson like Ron showed through out the whole process of categorizing the durinpar site. Even today, anyone can look at the research. Any thinking, logical person can see that it is truly the ark.
@@beckyd3546 , Did you ever consider that Ron Wyatt is the one who lied?
Ron Wyatt did scientific research on the 'ark shaped like structure'. Ron and the top geologist in turkey did a deep investigation on this site. They used sensitive seismic and sounding equipment to conclusively determine that yes, this was a ship and yes, it is as old as the flood. Ron also found burial sites of Noah and his wife. The remains are in a museum in turkey. Turkey was so sure that this was the historical site of a very very old boat that slid down the mountain with a glacier, then was covered up which petrified the wood. They designated it as a national park. There is a book categorizing all of the factual scientific evidences. You should do better research. Unless you did, and know that you are being deceptive.
@servant_serv-ant😅😅😅 Quran contradicts the Bible. The god of the quran IS NOT the God of the Bible
Yes the turkish government even recognizes this as noahs ar. Rons theory was a volcano not a glacier.
They Turkish government says it is?! HahAHAHHahah. Come on. Where is the scientific review? Where is the publically submitted papers? They dont exist because this was all BS
@@Jans8021
It is you that are so terribly lost in the facts... So sad.
seriously? Oh dear... So i guess there is a global conspiracy to keep this amazing find under wraps? Please advise on the facts you have that supports that theory. I am really interested.
“If you zoom out you’ll see other places that look just like it” (continues to show no places that look just like it)
Exactly bro that what I seen too😂😂
@@Dat_1REB i remember the guy in the interview said when they checked the measurements they initially thought it was done in hebrew language which didnt match then they realised it was done in egyptian since moses was eductated there and it matched.. so im confused with this presentation
I absolutely, 100+% believe Ron Wyatt proved the Drupinar site to be Noah's Ark.
You Cant explain away the gigantic anchor stones.
Carvings with eight figures on it..
A god of love leaving artifacts behind like the burial headdress and the shroud. Blood matches
Only the chromosomes of a woman. Sadly the world has been over vaccinated dumbed down no common sense and preoccupied by 400 channels of garbage
Pesquisadores do Canal History chegaram a uma conclusão de que a suposta ‘Arca de Noé' nunca existiu e que o chamado 'Dilúvio' teria ocorrido somente na região do Mar Negro e, em vez da 'Arca', foram usadas para flutuação as casas dos moradores construídas em sistema de palafitas - iguais aquelas das beiras de rios no Amazonas e outras regiões do Brasil - que eram usadas na região muito propensa a alagamentos. Então as moradias eram feitas para flutuar no caso de enchentes e os animais salvos foram os animais domésticos dos moradores da área alagada. O Mar Negro, conforme amostras de lodo retiradas de seu fundo com restos de animais de água doce com sondas cilíndricas para grandes profundidades, comprovariam que o referido mar foi um lago de água doce antes de receber águas salgadas por meio do Mar de Mármara. Foram encontrados também bolsões de água doce no fundo do Mar Negro.
Then you are easily conned. The Durupinar site is a natural rock formation. Even AIG admitted Wyatt was a fraud. The so called anchor stones are carved from the local volcanic rock, not from Mesopotamia and are pagan in nature, with later carvings made by Christians.
I also believe that Mr Wyatt found it but not a word of his findings in today's society shows that the Bible is truth praise God
@@paulrobinson2604 , That Wyatt’s findings didn’t make worldwide headlines should be a clue to you. He is no more credible than Indiana Jones, but believe in your fantasy if you like.
This video is a load of tosh! The presenter is totally ignorant of the details of Ron Wyatt's findings on the Duprinar site and the ongoing archaeology discoveries as recent as September 2023. Methinks there is a considerable amount of religious and archaeological jealousy being brought to bear on this site by the so-called expert ignoramuses. Christianity in general is appalled that God would choose Ron Wyatt, a Seventh Day Adventist of all things. to uncover many of the sites relating to the Genesis accounts of His chosen people.
i don't care who She picked
😂
For three years in the early 50's, my folks resided in Laurelwood, OR....which is primarily a Seventh Day Adventist community 30 miles SW of Portland, and is the only time my religious folks didn't attend some 'brand' of church, dragging we five kids along, of which I was the eldest. For three years, three of we five walked a full two miles to a small one room schoolhouse, where one teacher valiently tried teaching a wide variety of subjects to about 25 students, where my Enguish suffered and plauged me all ot the way into college. When I realized I was going to have to repeat Bonehead Enguish for a third time, I finally buckled down and 'got it', even somewhere along the way, learning to correctly spell English!
About seven weeks prior to the end of the school year, my folks moved on to another town to be closer to where my mother worked, while I elected to stay with an older couple so I could finish the 7th grade. While I was there, this couple forced me to attend thier sh*tty SDA church, which I fully credit with sewing the initial seeds of the atheist I morphed into and now at age 84, remain so to this very day. BHE
Ron Wyatt found Noah's Ark. The Turkish government has confirmed this. The Turkish locals who have lived in the area their whole lives have always known the Durupinar site to be Noah's Ark even before Ron Wyatt made claims to the world about it. Plenty of scientific research has been done on Noah's Ark and books have been written on the subject (The Noah's Ark Book by Vance Ferrell and Discovering GOD's treasures by Kevin Fisher). Why does the Ark encounter deny all of these facts? Show everyone the scientific research the Ark Encounter has done at the site so we can compare it with the extensive research Ron Wyatt and others have done over decades.
GOD has preserved Noah's Ark for future generations of skeptics such as ours. Ron Wyatt was used by GOD to not only find Noah's Ark but the Red Sea Crossing site, Sodom and Gomorrah, and the Ark of the Covenant. GOD chose Ron Wyatt to find these things because he was a faithful Christian who kept ALL 10 of GOD's Commandments including the Sabbath (Ecclesiastes 12:13).
Again GOD has preserved the Ark and all the the other discoveries as a wake up call to our generation here at the end of time to show that the Bible is true and all of the great stories in Genesis, which is the foundation of the Bible, are true historical accounts. May GOD bless each and everyone of you as you study HIS Word!
👍🏼🕊well, at least we can see the one in Kentucky ❤thanx and may our Father bless your socks off❤🕊
The Ark exhibit! Lord Willing I'm looking forward to seeing it!
We @4425 CR388 AL. Are OPEN HOSTAGES OF corrupt USMS PD AND SHERIFF CHILD TRAFFICKERS IN THE 36854 area NO DECENT HUMAN INVESTIGATING AT ALL!!!! DON'T SEND ANY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AT ALL!!! My neighbors are sadistic demented serial killers blood related to the CORRUPTION!!! Send info IMMEDIATLY TODAY TO FBI DOJ IMMEDIATELY. NO EMAILS NO CALLS NO COMMENTS SEND IMMEDIATE RESCUE TODAY
@@oreally8605 its been on my bucket list for years. I just moved 2 hours away . God answers prayers. ❤🕊
May your prayers be answered too.🕊❤
Ah yes, the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. How much is a ticket?? Why, if this is such a wonderful way to spread the gospel, do they need to charge? The scripture says to give freely what has been given to you from above. Which means, if you charge for it, it is not of God.
The Ark exhibit is amazing! It’s great paired with the Creation Museum (like 40 minutes away) too! So incredible!
A E is great.....but ......you gotta talk details of what Ron found ....or you sound like the mainstream media
You sound like the lying mainstream media!! Who are you working for?? Rob Wyatt?? How much is he paying you?? I will PRAY for you!!
@@--..-...-..-.--.... That rock formation is the wrong shape. It was not a boat it was not going anywhere. All it had to do was float. Plus the actual ark was seasoned waterproof wood. It would have been used by the Noah clan for everything they needed to restart life and survive.
All Ron Wyatt found was a lot of gullible people.
@--..-...-..-.--....methinks thou doth protest too much. Calm your hormones. Ron Wyatt did impeccable research and categorizing of the ark site in turkey. It is all available to analyze. But I don't think you are looking for truth, just something to hyperventilate about.
@@beckyd3546 , Do you have a calendar? Mine says it’s 2023, not 1623.
There is the little detail that in 1987, Turkey has recognised this as Noah's Ark. They even built a visitors Center, paved a road to it, and designated it as Noah’s Ark National Park.
So...other than that? There is no credible proof.
Probably built that stuff to make money from tourism 🤷♂
@@TravelingInFaith
If you mean the park and visitors center, sure, why not?
The boat shaped object has been known about for at least a hundred years when it was photographed from an airplane. So, no it was not just built.
I have Ron's original "Blue Book." Everything is in there. They were lined up with the Ark. Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. The names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter. Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man. Ron did what he was told to do and believe me, it hurt sometimes. This was no glory trip. In fact he used up a lot of money constantly going over there. Almost lost his life a few times.
That was claimed. Yet it is not true. There is no road to it. You have to hike two miles from the highway to see it. Another Wyatt deception.
@@blueeyedsoulman Ron Wyatt was a grifter who hustled businessmen and television producers to invest money into Wyatt Archaeological Research for film rights. There were many thousands of dollars invested in WAR. None of those who invested this money ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence substantiating Wyatt's claims. Where is an actual professional lab report regarding the blood sample analysis of what Ron claims is the blood of Jesus Christ? Where is the Ark of the Covenant? Which museum is housing the ancient chariot wheels he claimed to have been from the Red Sea Crossing? There is no evidence because Wyatt's videos are a fraud. One of the major warning signs of pseudo-archaeology includes discoveries pitched directly to the media. The pseudo-archaeologist knows his or her claim will not stand up to scrutiny by actual archaeologists nor would it ever pass the scrutiny of peer review, so it gets pitched directly to the media.
Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. What about the names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter? Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man.
Pesquisadores do Canal History chegaram a uma conclusão de que a suposta ‘Arca de Noé' nunca existiu e que o chamado 'Dilúvio' teria ocorrido somente na região do Mar Negro e, em vez da 'Arca', foram usadas para flutuação as casas dos moradores construídas em sistema de palafitas - iguais aquelas das beiras de rios no Amazonas e outras regiões do Brasil - que eram usadas na região muito propensa a alagamentos. Então as moradias eram feitas para flutuar no caso de enchentes e os animais salvos foram os animais domésticos dos moradores da área alagada. O Mar Negro, conforme amostras de lodo retiradas de seu fundo com restos de animais de água doce com sondas cilíndricas para grandes profundidades, comprovariam que o referido mar foi um lago de água doce antes de receber águas salgadas por meio do Mar de Mármara. Foram encontrados também bolsões de água doce no fundo do Mar Negro.
I believed that Ronn Wyatt found the ark I am teaching my kids that is the oldest man made thing on earth
@@paulrobinson2604 , Why not teach them that Alice In Wonderland is real too?
Oldest Man made thing on earth? Seriously?
@@bolitho1999 Yeah, I caught that too. I guess they don't follow megalithic structures discoveries etc.
It doesnt matter where it is..... Why get so wrapped up in where God placed the Ark, instead... get wrapped up in God Himself...
Absolutely
I get wrapped up in god trough the bible and studying the bible. It feels like my connection with god grows when I read and study.
Yeah- who needs proof when you have your trusty faith? Let’s believe a ridiculous story clearly written by man as true and dedicate our lives to this fictional character without a single shred of proof or evidence.
@@JOinLC351 but what is faith and how do you show faith in someone?
Faith is simply the belief in something without having any facts or evidence to support ones belief. I see faith as a dangerous component in the human mind. It allows one to really believe whatever they want to. Similar to the circular argujments that the bible proves the bible. Those devout followers see thier very faith as proof of whatever they believe- strengthening that faith even more. They allow themselves to believe utterly idiotic ideas with faith as the lense. They so trust thier faith that they want to shove it down other's throats. @@donaldgeterjr8180
If you don't believe in what this man is portraying, don't comment on it. It's not just rude, but it's stupid, to comment on something you like and enjoy. It's rude to the people who do believe in God and the global catastrophe.
Wow, touchy touchy.
😢 you should pray to God to give you the grace to lighten up
What about Ron Wyatt's find?
Ron Wyatt did not find anything he claimed to see. AiG already debunked him numerous times.
The Durupinar site. ✔️
He is a scam artist people!
Nonsense. As any professional geologist would tell you that natural rock formation in Turkey, which is frequently misidentified as a boat, is nothing more than a doubly plunging syncline. Additionally, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
Wyatt was a proven fraud even by christian archeologists
What about the anchor stones found?
Those alleged "anchor stones" are composed of local andesite, and NOT from material available in Mesapotamia.
The durupinar site is definitely the ark, regardless of the "similar geological" formations nearby. The durupinar site matches the dimensions of the ark to a "T" and ground penetrating radar has found parallel lines and man made structures underneath. None of those are naturally occurring on their own, there was so much evidence of structures beneath the ground such as lines, rooms and 90° angles that it's a no brainer at this point. The Ark was made of Gopher wood is apparently laminated wood which is much more resistant to decay.
Faith is the opposite of science, yet it's also one common element that you will always hear valued in religion. It's the number one most common excuse for holding peculiar superstitious beliefs in spite of the evidence against them, their violations of sense, and their foundation in wishful thinking and rhetorical vapor - it puts ignorance on a pedestal. Also, and professional geologist would recognize that natural rock formation as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more. As for Ron Wyatt, he was a hustler who snookered businessmen and TV producers into investing cash into his enterprises in return for film rights, but no one who invested that cash ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence supporting Wyatt's claims because all of his videos were carefully constructed frauds - even his wife now admits he was a fraudster.
Ron Wyatt's group performed some core sampling, and in one, they found a piece of antler, a bit of aluminum, yes, long before aluminum was ever discovered, and if I remember correctly, an iron rivet. I saw that on a video probably 8 years ago. How far away are the anchor stones from Wyatts site? Wern't they found close by?
Yes. I have Ron's original "Blue Book." Everything is in there. They were lined up with the Ark. Ron showed the rivets used to fasten the wood (they were everywhere on it) and literally pulled a piece of petrified laminated wood out of the thing. The names of the place, the drogue stones, the graves and alter. Ron was the humblest man I have ever met. He was not lying. It is being preserved by the Lord for his good purposes. Ron prophesied that this would happen. He would be ridiculed and the Lord will look after his things for a purpose. If you didn't know him, believe me, when he showed up, stuff just appeared. No way God wasn't with that man. Ron did what he was told to do and believe me, it hurt sometimes. This was no glory trip. In fact he used up a lot of money constantly going over there. Almost lost his life a few times.
It’s almost as if either Ron Wyatt or Ark Encounter are lying to you all.... wait, it couldn’t be both of them making different stuff up could it?
@@sjl197 With Ron it was almost 40 years ago. I'm 58. Ron often got information (like downloads) directly from the Lord. He often prayed and got directions such as turn left here, put a pile of marker stones over there, dig over here etc. Many times the people ruling over those areas would just give him the ability to dig and demonstrate. This is true with Egypt, Turkey and even SA although that was a series of the craziest miracles. He said his discoveries would be covered over and it was part of what the Lord was doing. Not just Noah's Ark but dozens of things like S&G, the Red Sea crossing etc. He said these things were being protected to be used at a later date in the end times. They were only known at the time by a select few. Even though there was a 60 minutes episode where this was shown it wasn't what most people were prepared to except. In the last days of the rebellion no one will be without excuse. There will even be angels warning people to repent immediately. Everything will be shown and no one will be excused. In the end you're either saved or you're not. Let's face it, mankind is just full of lies. You have to have the Holy Spirit to SHOW you the kingdom of heaven. Did anyone bother to see the Revelation 12 sign appear in the heavens? It's an astronomical fact as plain as day. It's the final hour. It will begin shortly. No one can stop what's coming. BTW 2033 marks 2000 years exactly since the Lord blasted out of that tomb/ cave. Jesus blood covering your sins is the only way to live on, forever.
@@blueeyedsoulman ok, so you’re sounding like you know the divine truth, you know the future and Wyatt received information like “downloads”. Please keep these baseless and insane views away from me.
@@sjl197 The only thing YOU need to know is Jesus loves you and his blood can save you if you repent of your personal sin and accept Jesus as saviour and Lord. This is not a salvation issue. I will say what I experienced as I please.
You know what’s really annoying is when they come up with reasonable things to account for it by just looking at it dig it up then just dig stop thinking about it and get your hands dirty
It’s because they know deep inside that there is nothing there.
@@JOinLC351 I don't get why you were watching this in the first place. I know you don't believe that this exist but it doesn't make sense that you try to discourage people of their beliefs. Have some respect.
@@yeime hey if someone thinks this is hogwash- they are just as entitled to their opinion as you are to yours. no one's discouraging ANYONE.
Just think: 2000 years from now, scientists are going to discover the ark in Kentucky and be so confused.
No one will be around
"2000 years from now"......
The word scien! ugh
Scientist understand that the flood story is nothing but a myth
@@nickroberts-xf7oq
The earth will likely (since we can only
guess the timeline at this point) have
been destroyed and renewed by then.
Have to say, That is funny!!
No, it hasn't.
The pics show a natural ground-surface feature.
Exactly. As any professional geologist would tell you that natural rock formation in Turkey, which is frequently misidentified as a boat, is nothing more than a doubly plunging syncline. Additionally, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
that's not fair- you know geology!!
Do you know why Noahs insurance did not go up after he crashed the Ark.....He had ARK-CIDENT FORGIVENESS INSURANCE 🤣😂🤓
It's the ark. Ron Wyatt is the real deal folks.
did noah make sure he had a pair of binturongs in there? i don't recall seeing any in the ark encounter commercials.. my point is that thing could NOT have held a pair of EVERY animal on earth.
5:32 -
MY EDUCATED GUESS IS THAT IT LANDED IN THE ARARAT MOUNTAINS, BUT FINALLY RESTED MILES AWAY ON MOUNT JUDI. AFTER WATER LEVELS KEPT DECLINING OR GLACIERS STOPPED MOVING.
IT CURRENTLT RESIDES ON MOUNT JUDI IN TURKEY.
SO, ACTUALLY BOTH ARE TRUE. ARARAT AND JUDI BOTH WELCOMED THE ARK.
Does anyone have the specific coordinates?
I just wonder how we expect a wood to survive thousands of years ago?
happens all the time- ever seen petrified wood?
@@tommurphy4307 sure, except what's at the top of that mountain isn't petrified at all. It's just a rock formation that's part of the mountain.
God commanded Noah to apply pitch to both the outside and inside of the ark.
@@thecastorclan3017 🤣🤣🤣
Some grown adults believe that two penguins walked all the way from Antarctica to the Middle East to aboard an ark built by a 500 year old man
Hey "Answers" in Genesis...I got lot's of questions. Like why don't you give any of the real evidence from the Durupinar area? Like the stones from the ark all around it.
Nope Ron Wyatt found it alright.they did find wood and ribs of the ship and metal rivets in a specific patern
Can you please show me the peer reviewed scientific research that confirms that.
@@Jewonastick
Yes, it's called the people who were there and saw the miracles that happened every time. If you don't have the faith to believe that, don't worry about it. It's not a salvation issue. Make sure you have the blood of Christ covering your sins. As for those of us who new Ron. Maybe it was just supposed to be a small circle who realized the truth. EVERYTHING is available. You just have to want to see it really badly and God has to open the doors for you to see it. But trust me, the faithless can have a miracle right in front of them and they won't even see it. Satan is really trying hard to mock the things of the Lord. All WILL be revealed.
@@blueeyedsoulman cool, so no evidence.... You just have to want it to be real really bad
@estok918
Just like you have NO evidence for evolution. It's a religion. It takes much mire faith to believe in that BS than to just give God the credit. 📖
@@nickroberts-xf7oq Actually, evolution is both an observed fact and the most well substantiated scientific theory there is...
Why does Snelling make statements supporting a young Earth and than write science papers completely contradicting his young Earth claims? He can't have it both ways.
There are many rock formations like the
Durupinar site where there are rock ‘spines’
that lay against hills like this one. The one
here is conventionally boat shaped, the
Ark was more likely box shaped, as the name
Ark implies.
Made of fossilized wood?
The Ark was made of seasoned wood. It was waterproof. It had a second function. It would take approximately 30-40 years for trees to grow, maybe longer. It would be a good source of wood for houses, animal shelters, barns for food from the Ark until the land regrew. fencing to protect the domestic animals.
The ark would have sank into the wet soils where it landed. There would be a shape of the Ark in the sediment which dries into rock but the wood would eventually have been used..
That's a good point
There are innumerable structures
of the ancient world made of rock,
tiny, small, large and huge structures.
Wood is nice but not needed. There
are trees that grow extremely fast,
@@saywhat8966 Your imagination seems to be lacking. A worldwide flood had just happened. It made the rocks along with volcanoes, ouch hot. First find your suitable rocks! Or die waiting for it to set. cool, or the trees to grow. What is easier trying to dig out rocks or remove a ready made source of waterproof, seasoned wood? I know what I'd do. It seems man had more intelligence then, than a lot of people today.
If we read scripture we see that destruction of all flesh is what was destroyed. We also know that many lands have been flooded and still have standing timber. Logs are still harvested from under water from many years ago.
"Genesis 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die."
"Genesis 7:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 7:22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark. 7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days."
@servant_serv-ant what does the Quran know about the flood? You must get your information from the Hebrew Bible.
I think after the waters receded, the ship got stuck in the mud and this shape emerged.
So how did the animals get back to their respective continents? Uber?
I think you are not correct.
mountaintop mud- i hate when that happens....
@@JOinLC351
ship length 6 km width 2 km rivet-like nail 15 tons.42.94494 47.46900 googl map
@@JOinLC351 probably there were landbridges after the breakup into the continents with the flood (the underground fountains opened accoring to the bible)
Looks like a natural rock formation to me I would think that Noah would have dismantled the ark to make his Vineyard and to build his home rather than leave it to not use.
Noah would of used the wood after the ark was not needed. He built it and knew how to disassemble it.
Can’t say would don’t survive that long because it was made from gopherwood that’s no longer on earth so you don’t know how long that type of wood lasted so doubtful
As if that's the biggest issue with ark fabble
Gopherwood grows in my backyard. It's called cottonwood now. Same tree.
Your biggest issue is belief. You don't even need that, look at the laboratory tests that were done on the durinpar site. Go to the historical site in turkey. Take off your preconceived fallacies handed to you to keep you enslaved and you will see.
NO FAIR- YOU KNOW ABOUT TREES! HOW RUDE AND DISCOURAGING.
What's with everyone using Ron Wyatt as a reference?. Ron was never an Archeologist and has had all his worked critisised by professionals in different fields.
He claimed to have found over 100 biblical sites in his lifetime and sold books on it all. He played you all.
The ARK was first photographed in 1915, by an American pilot, since then a few expeditions have been there!
being an American means its definitely true?? thats a slap in the face to the Turks.
"We dont need evidence, god word told us"
Ron said it would be used at the time of the end as testimony against the unbelievers. Just as Satan has a purpose so does the evidence. It's not about believers although I enjoyed it. It's God's property to do as he pleases with. Satan is also God's property to do as he pleases with and that just drives him nuts because there is no Gospel of Salvation for fallen angels or demons. Only human beings have a way out.
There's lots of historical information about Noah's Ark being on top of Mount Ararat. It's there & numerous testimonial persons have seen it.
The locals wasted no time setting up a tourist trap.
"see ruby falls" "see rock city" "see lookout mountain" "visit the lost sea"... we do that, too.
It seems so silly to me that modern man tries to make their version of the ark as a big square box from modern timber style building materials. When God design it with curved reeds and pitch-a catamaran type ship with an bottom opening down the middle which allowed the natural wave movement to 'pump' fresh air in and out of the small opening at the center of the top of the roof.
and She also designed it with two heads so She wouldn't have to wait for the ladies room.
I 100% agree that Ron Wyatt found the Ark. The proof is in his documentary. People dont want to recognize it because he was a 7th day adventist. But I truly believe God used him. Why should we believe your claims that the earth is only thousands of years old?
Flavius Josephus wrote that the Ark was still visible in his time, and people made pilgrimages to it, chipping off pieces to make amulets. It wouldn't last to our day if people were chipping away at it.
Faith is the opposite of science, yet it's also one common element that you will always hear valued in religion. It's the number one most common excuse for holding peculiar superstitious beliefs in spite of the evidence against them, their violations of sense, and their foundation in wishful thinking and rhetorical vapor - it puts ignorance on a pedestal.
@@plainsman faith is the key component of science. You have to put faith in the idea that the world is understandable first, or you wouldn't even try to persue science by observation. You have confidence in science. Confidence is straight Latin, meaning "with faith". It is only because God upholds His creation that you don't see new life popping into existence, or camels having puppies, or the earth falling into the sun. Any person who hasn't read the Bible can't be considered to have any education at all, and that's one reason why so many interpretations of data in the scientific literature are debunked within a few years, sometimes in only months. If you put all your faith in man, you will always be disappointed. You will be led to cognitive dissonance by greedy, grant hungry, ambitious men and women who have no reason to tell you the truth, because they rebel against God's moral standard. When you believe that man's word has the authority over the unchanging Word of God, you become a pawn in the hands of the most dissolute deceivers in power. Repent and follow Jesus Christ, to have eternal life. Your life in this world is so brief, it's an eye blink. You will die. Thousands of people die everyday. You don't know the hour of your demise. You could die tonight. If you put your faith and trust in Jesus, you will never die. You will have eternal life.
we still have some pieces of the berlin wall leftover if youre interested- make you a great deal...
This was a waste of time video with no evidence other than some "experts" say it isn't there. I would expect far more from the Ark Encounter. Lost some respect for the lack of proof claims. There are educated experts who say the flood never happened; I don't go make a click bait negative video with no proof with their claims. Humble arrogance in this guy.
many people would need to see it... so if it was ever found it could bring people to faith i god, or strengthen other people fatith....
Have you guys never heard of termites. Wood laying on ground would have only a few years.
If it is the original ark that it’s existence is prove that hood is real as he instructed Noah to make it
Did you folks check Mount Cudi / Judi in the Zagros mountains in Turkey? The place of 'descent' for Noah. There appears to be remains of an archaeological city on Google Maps hiding out here in the mountain that nobody seems to have marked as a landmark. I'd be willing to bet this is where Noah was either coming from or ended up after the flood. It would have been A water source for the Tigris....for which Mari might have been blamed / attacked by Akkadians for stealing water from the surrounding region after they built agricultural up on the mountain and redirected that water from the Tigris.....
NO WAY
I know AIG have good intentions, but just as they are skeptical of these findings im skeptical of a lot of their ideas. They think God created sun, moon and stars on day 4 when scripture plainly says God created Heaven (sun, moon, planets and stars) and earth in the beginning, orbday one.
Yeah, they have so many things they totally miss the mark on. But we are all imperfect. I just balk at the arrogance and flippant manner they gloss over facts and make logical fallacies.
I am guessing your are choosing to pretend that the Bible includes passages where the sun's motion is mentioned, in a way which seemingly contradicts the heliocentric model? The Bible indicates a geocentric model just like the people of the time believed. Isn’t that interesting?
"Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
The Heaven being the cosmos is mentioned first does not contradict but our perception might.
"Genesis 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."
What was this light? Many say it was God's light, but God was light from the beginning. So, the light must have been what we know to be stars. And if "Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.", so would the Cosmos be. And, "Genesis 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:", God did not recreate them here but put them in place. "Job 9:8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea."
The Earth seems to be the center of attention because you and I are the center of His attention. When we allow God to be the center of our attention we might see things a lot differently.
Nobody knows, they keep changing the names of mountains especially that range.
...and opening up tourist traps just as fast.
it’s made of wood it would rot no? only thing to find maybe the anchors
Petrified wood doesn’t rot or decay.
youre not using your noggin for its designed purpose- if they had anchors- how would the vessel have become high-centered on a mountaintop?
Well you showed other examples of possible locations but none of them come close to the dimensions or descriptions..
The boat would have landed on a mountain and not under one on a plain, if everything was flooded he would have to dock it at a mountain.
Also the dimesions given to that mountain outcrop are accurate in L/W within 10 metres, which is still alot but cubits as a measurment is not accurate anyway.
oh, i see- they paddled around the world to make sure of that.
It behooves Christians to be skeptical of "things" until something verifiable emerges.
The FACT is that the pattern of the "anchor stones" lends creedence to the Durupinar site as related elements.
I really can't get excited about claims concerning a 16,000ft mountain. Poor planning by the architect of the
mission, for sure! BUT, Jesus said that the last days "will be LIKE the days of Noah." Check! I can easily see
history looking back saying, "HOW could they have been so STUPID!" If these times weren't so terrible, it would
truely be something to laugh at. But EVERYBODY"S got a nuke! Ezekiel 38 and 39, Zechariah 14, Revelation 9 and 20!
Genghis Khan has his modern day pretenders. What if Churchill had just retreated in shame from Gallipoli?
why everyone just focus on mount arart when the book of genesis clearly stated the its restint on the Mountants of ararat Not the the mountain ararat so its talking about geological area call ararat with more then one mountain besises arat mountain was to dangerous for god to landed his survivor in ararat mountan even for some annimal to get kill to go down noah say the land was dry must be a lower mountain that was resting;
Wood survived in the pyramids 4000 yrs
I still believe the ark is in Bethlehem
The Durupinar site is a natural geological formation called Limonite.
With bolts and timbers? I don't think so. Lying-ite maybe.
@@me-yc9gr Any reputable geologist knows perfectly well that the natural rock structure near Dogubayazit, Turkey, has been repeatedly misidentified as Noah's Ark. Microscopic studies of a supposed iron bracket show that it is derived from weathered volcanic minerals. Supposed metal-braced walls are natural concentrations of limonite and magnetite in steeply inclined sedimentary layers in the limbs of a doubly plunging syncline. Supposed fossilized gopherwood bark is crinkled metamorphosed peridotite. Fossiliferous limestone, interpreted as cross cutting the syncline, preclude the structure from being Noah's Ark because these supposed "Flood" deposits are younger than the "Ark." Alleged anchor stones at Kazan are derived from local andesite and NOT from Mesopotamia. Only science illiterates would be gullible enough to ignore this reality.
@@me-yc9grThere was never any bolts or timber found. Wood would have rotted centuries ago, and bronze and iron weren't even invented yet at the alleged time of Noah.
I find this presentation interesting, however, there are some variables you left out, which I will mention. I am in no way an expert; merely someone who has researched this and other topics for over 40 yrs.
1. Scripture tells us the process of events as the water subsided and it could not have settled on a low lying region because Noah sent out 3 different birds about a week apart to determine if land/vegetation was showing and/or growing back. Since the first and second bird exploration was unsuccessful, it would infer that no other land was viable apart from their immediate high area, thus they were not below the 7 - 9,000 ft marker.
2. When the flood waters was swirling debris around, and buildup began, who's to say that it didn't happen by the providence of God to prepare a place for the ark to settle into... high up above any and all mountain ridges? As the waters subsided, the sediment was still swirling about in the lower regions and creating layers upon layers until the earth's surface dried up sufficiently to move about on.
3. There are many examples where people made shrines for supposedly holy sites, but that does not mean they are holy ones. Case in point: The location that Constantine's mother decided was the place where Jesus was crucified and then buried is just traditional thinking. Scripture gives us plain clues about it's locations, just as we do with the ark of Noah. After leaving the ark, his family could have migrated to the place where some claim is the place that the eight people came out of the ark at and lived. Speculation.
4. There have been several credible eye witnesses that testify that the ark is on the mountain which you say is a volcano. So what if it is/was one, that does not negate the possibility of the ark being there preserved by God and the holy angels for a time when it may finally be revealed so that people will have one more reason to believe in Holy Writ.
The way the ark was made would have withstood a lot of abuse. However, due to its age, that when the mountain erupted and tore 1/6th of the mountain away, the Ahora Gorge was formed, but the ark merely broke into at least two segments straddling the gorge.
George Hagopian returned to the ark on Ararat a few years after his first encounter with his uncle and saw the ark still where he last saw it. It is usually during a very warm season that the ark was detected and visited regularly by the natives in Armenia who have sworn to protect it.
IMHO, the reason most do not see it is because almost year round snow and ice cover that region at the top.
5. That formation Ron Wyatt called Noah's ark was, as some have surmised, to be a natural occurrence when mud or lava comes to an outcropping and it moves around it, creating a boat-like formation... as you discussed. It is only a boat-like shape and as you mentioned, there are various other areas that have similar formations, but they aren't THE ark.
Some say Wyatt's team found samples of various materials at that site, but such items infer it is merely segments of a structure that held whatever it was in place instead of it being a barge which the ark was. Also, the ark would not need anchor stones or a keel, because they would keep the people inside from depending and trusting on God's providential hand to guide and protect them in the storm.
You are correct in saying that we don't need the ark to know the flood occurred, since there is an overwhelming amount of evidence to prove it came upon all living flesh and that the place in Glen Rose, Texas proves that dinosaurs and man existed simultaneously for a time leading up to the flood.
All of your points are terribly dependent on the scriptures being real and accurate or simply downright wrong. glen rose does not prove your funny theory at all. The tracks were laid at completely separate times and do not indicate man lived with dinosaurs. Finally, the vast majority of physical evidence shows that there was NO global flood even as described in the Bible. That is the facts.
God had Noah pitch the ark inside and out to preserve it. The ark will be found in God’s timing.
Me still think this whole world is a simulation
Very Good!... #51 ✝ {9-5-2023}
God, the creator of all that exists, that destroyed all but Noah and his family is able to preserve wood under any condition He chooses. He IS a supernatural being with sovereign power over all that He created.
What God is able to do is not the question here. We know He's omnipotent, but we don't know if anything is left of Noah's ark.
@@jaredolar9879 that is true. It's definitely not doctrinally essential but it's quite interesting. There is certainly an abundance of other archeological finds that also attest to the historical accuracy of God's Word.
If you were telling me the next lottery numbers I’d still turn off
Dude. U k ow they did 3d scans of the one in turkey, right? And that they found wooden beams in it. Chinese svienalso went inside 😅 and found rooms.
Ask yourselves, why didnt your savior mentioned where his boat landed after the waters receded. So simple. So far no Ark.
Moment of silence to the people that believes in this
Where is the real proof
Noah's Ark has been found in six different locations by men of faith.
“God works in mysterious ways” will be the explanation I am sure. Ugh! Unbelievable.
@@JOinLC351 That's a metaphor only used when people can't explain a death. It's never used to explain bible verses.
That is absolutely false. It is not tied to death. It is used for anything that god may do. William Cowper first penned what would become the source of this phrase 250 years ago and it had nothing to do with death. You need to study more my friend and stop pretending like you know what you are talking about because you clearly do not.
@@timspiker
well you may want to get with Ron Wyatt and Los Alamos labs.
Most likely the ark was dismantled for building materials because there was no lumber around
but magically it reappeared as a petrified monolith.
Why would anyone think that Noah's ark would ever be found? Did anyone ever think that after the flood, that Noah and his family disassembled the ark to use the wood to build from? God is not wasteful.. So instead of using the wood for their new homes, they started cutting down water logged trees?
No they used stone.
I’m aware this is not the point you are trying to make, but I read this in my Bible tonight actually- they used hardened dirt/clay to build after the flood! Genesis 11! Again- this is nit picky haha but I got excited because I read it earlier tonight!
Highly likely that it was disassembled to create their homes.
Much more likely that it never existed to begin with.
@@JOinLC351you have more than 86 comments in this channel , go quit and get yourself a job and get off your lil flip phone boy 💀🙏
@@110pLover somebody needs a tissue.
If wood wouldn't survive, why would you be saying that "no wood materials were found? Also, you didn't address the 3D images that were found from geothermal imaging at the ark site that show 90 degree angles and parallel lines, appearing to be rooms. Found I believe in 2021.
complete garbage. any info you have that the are is there is fake. NOTHING IS THERE!
Doesn’t the Quran state its mount Judi? If it does - that’s where it is !
Dose the name of area not ring anny bells?
Ararat Hebrew: Urartu Assyrian.
Mountains
Great Wall
The mesurments?
300 Cubits long
50 Cubits wide
30 Cubits High
Royal Egyptian Cubit=
52.34cm
300x 52.34cm =157m?
515ft =156.972m long?
50x 52.34cm = 26.17m wide
30x 52.34cm =15.7m high
Shape and mesurments look right for me.
Please remember not all people on earth can see 3D vision.
There is people believing in Flate Earth Dome stuff.
I have seen Mr Ron Wyatt video as a young boy.
And watched it 20 years later.
I have very mutch experiance in Boat racing. Earth moving and ENGINEERING DESIGN.
I CAN STILL SEE THE IMAGE AS A GIANT VESSEL SHAPE.
WIL DRILLING TUNNELS HORIZONTAL I HAVE SEEN PETRIPHIDE WOOD DRILLING CUTTING LOGS.
I CAN SEE MR Wyatt GAVE HIS FULL COMMITMENT TO FIND CREATIONS OF THE PAST.
Stop using a corrupt version of Gods Word.....Get a 1611 King James Bible the preserved word of God.....unreal exactly why I dont sub to this channel.......Easy...
Holy lord, did I just watch a video debunking claims about Noah’s ark based on actual geology? The rest here aren’t going to trust that 😅
Nope, no actual geology was used, quoted, or even shown. Just some rando guy flapping his lips. There WAS actual geology done at the ark site in turkey. They have a museum there with all of the research, excavation, sounding, and testimony from the top historian in turkey that helped Ron.
They don’t like pesky facts and science around these parts. Faith reigns supreme!
@@JOinLC351 It's best when the two meet. Science doesn't have an answer for cell creation funnily, you can look it up. Scholars just claim to know, but when you ask them to recreate a cell in a lab they can't do it. That's because we have no clue on how to create life other than... the obvious.
Sorry athiests here’s the proof that God is real 😂 but wait… even though they have proof they’ll never believe lol 😅
moutainsssssss of Ararat...
What should keep every viewer from reporting this as spam or misleading, based on the title and thumbnail? Deception is the first and foremost sin in the Bible.
Ouch, burn.
Lol.
I guess your say so isn't enough
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Sarcasm
No it hasn't been found because Noah the ark or the flood never happened
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalms 14:1
If they want to find the ark they need to look further north in the Caucasian mountains. I've never believed this site was Noah's ark. Not even if they did cannibalize parts of the ark to build the early shelters after the flood.
They found rivets and fossilized wood. A mile up is where the hull is and the theory is a volcano ripped the boat in two and carried it down the mountain and destroyed it and what remains was fossilized. Maybe try watching the actual documentary about what they found vs just saying its not real.
I can’t wait to ask God if that is the site or not. So much controversy over the site. Wyatt was a delusional fanatic. I would listen to anyone else’s opinion other than his.
The claim that Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's Ark is not supported by scientific evidence or widely accepted by experts in the field of archaeology or geology. Ron Wyatt was an amateur archaeologist who made several controversial claims about discovering various biblical artifacts, including Noah's Ark, the Ark of the Covenant, and other biblical sites.
Here are some reasons why Ron Wyatt's claims are not widely accepted by the archaeological and scientific communities:
Lack of Scientific Evidence: There is no scientific or archaeological evidence to support Ron Wyatt's claims. Archaeological discoveries are typically subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny, peer review, and verification, which his claims did not undergo.
Inconsistent Claims: Ron Wyatt's claims about the location of Noah's Ark have shifted over time, and his descriptions of the site have been inconsistent. This raises doubts about the accuracy of his accounts.
Absence of Peer Review: Real archaeological discoveries are subject to peer review by experts in the field. Ron Wyatt's claims were not subjected to this rigorous process, which is a standard practice in the scientific community.
Lack of Credible Witnesses: Wyatt's claims often relied on his own testimony without credible witnesses or experts to corroborate his findings.
Commercial Interests: Ron Wyatt's expeditions and claims were associated with commercial ventures, including selling videos and books related to his discoveries. This can raise questions about potential financial motives.
Religious Bias: Some of Ron Wyatt's claims were strongly tied to his religious beliefs, which could have influenced his interpretations and findings.
It's important to approach claims about archaeological discoveries critically and with a healthy dose of skepticism, especially when they lack scientific validation and consensus within the academic community. While the search for biblical artifacts is of interest to many people, it should be conducted using rigorous scientific methods and standards.
To support claims of archaeological discoveries, it is essential to rely on peer-reviewed research, credible experts, and physical evidence that can withstand scrutiny by the wider scientific community. Claims that lack these elements should be viewed with caution and skepticism.
Ark Landed on mount Judi
Noah's cubit might be 3 times today's human cubit. The ark might be 3 times larger than our assumption of Noah's ark..
ship length 6 km width 2 km rivet-like nail 15 tons.42.94494 47.46900 googl map
I found the first mesurment unit.
Water Wasser stoff H2O!!
1 ROYAL FINGER IS
ONE WATER DROPLET
1CM DIAMETER 10mm
52.36cm cubit is 1:6 of
1m diameter circle piece.
Circumpherne of 1000mm circle OD x PI 3.1415= 3141.5mm is ÷6= 523,6mm ?
Royal finger 1cm
Royal hand 10cm
Royal Leg 100cm
Royal cubit 52.36cm volum mesure in length
Golden Ratio 1: 1.618
Groth of natural flow
Wood could not last 5000 years. Why spend so much time and energy trying to find a ship thats not there.
Just google “list of oldest surviving ships” and find Pesse canoe at 10,000 years.
There is a type of rock called petrified wood. Guess what it's made of??
@@beckyd3546 , Rock.
nothin more than rock, cmon people Fear scares into faith.
The bible is a book of mythology. The ark story was borrowed from Gilgamesh.
Some claim nimrod was gilgamesh
For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, And every tongue shall confess to God. Romans 14:11
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalms 14:1
Come on people… the archeological record does not support a global flood as described in the Bible. That makes the whole Noah story just that- a fricken story. Haven’t all the logistic impossibilities killed this for you yet? So tired
The geological record: Billions of dead things, buried in rock layers, laid down by water, all over the earth. There really was a worldwide flood.
We have three decks of exhibits at the Ark Encounter that show the logistics were possible.
@@arkencounterthe billions of dead things that date from the same time are found pretty much equally as man in water as on land
@@arkencounter Actually that's because the dirt near water has the proper density to preserve corpses, like silt or clay for example keep the bones intact.
But that doesn't discredit the bible. When you dig deep enough you'll find a layer of clay that can be found over the whole planet, suggesting the entire planet at one point was covered with water. There's also instances of human foot prints found next to dino foot prints in the same material. Suggesting that humanity is possibly much older than modern teachings suggest or perhaps that dinos were not wiped out by an asteroid but a flood. You can even find old cave paintings of humans riding dinos from a time where our history teachings suggest there shouldn't have been dinos or people knowing what dinos are. This suggests that men indeed walked with giants, just not the type of giants we think of when we say "giant". Could be because actual fairy tails were created on purpose to discredit the bible. There's been many wars against religion and propaganda is a form of warfare too. Info wars.
@@arkencounter , Actually a lot more than billions of dead things. Far more than could fit on the planet at the same time.
@@arkencounter AHHahaha! In spite of Ken Ham’s best efforts to show otherwise, by building his ark he demonstrated the hyperbole in the Flood story. Yes, he succeeded in building an ark the dimensions of Noah’s ark (510 feet long). As I look at the online video of the construction, though, I noticed all of the cranes, the metal scaffolding that keeps the structure from collapsing, the power tools, and last but not least the many, many skilled craftsmen and craftswomen who are built this large boat. I end up asking myself, could Noah and his family have built an ark of this dimension by themselves using only primitive tools? Let’s remember too that the time of Noah is well before the manufacture of iron, bronze, or cooper tools. I think the answer to that question is a decided “no”.
Who are you too disclaim the 20 year study of ron ron WYATT do some research
Yes, he even put it into an easy to read book. All the impeccable research and categorizing he and the turkey nationals did is laid out for all to see. But one needs to work a little bit at getting it, so most won't bother. This is why Yah says: it is the GLORY of Yah to conceal a matter and the HONOR of kings (and priests, and women kings aka queens) to search the matter out.
Bro… it is you that needs schooling. The guy is a scam artists and all of you are his victims.
Ron Wyatt was a hustler who snookered businessmen and TV producers into investing cash into his enterprises in return for film rights, but no one who invested that cash ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence supporting Wyatt's claims because all of his videos were carefully constructed frauds - even his wife now admits he was a fraudster.
Lack of building materials after the Flood. 🤔NO new trees yet for lumber, they would have used the materials of the ARK for the construction of their new homes.
😂You would think a company that built a wooden ark would have thought about that.🤣Do better.
some trees float. like cedar. there would be plenty of non rotted wood they could use. and who says they had to use wood? they could use clay, rock, ect.
There would have been plenty of trees (no rotted wood) Noah was on the ark for one year. It's possible some trees survived the flood.
Lots of stone to build with.
There are stone structures at the durinpar site in turkey dates to the time of the flood. Funny thing is, they are all built for 8-9 foot people. Another funny thing is, the graves that Ron found at the site had bones of a 9 foot man and a slightly smaller woman. The remains are in a museum in turkey.
do you got a link or picture of the 9 foot tall bones in Turkey?@@beckyd3546
How can you find something that never existed?
"How can you find something that never existed?" So you don't believe the ark existed? Interesting. So in your opinion where did the name Egypt come from?
@@marcj3682 , What does that have to do with anything? Egypt was there several thousand years before the story was written.
@@davidgardner863 "What does that have to do with anything?" It has a lot to do with the ark, it's just you haven't read the Bible and understood it. So again - where did the name Egypt come from? Know that, and you'll know the ark is true.
@@marcj3682 , Why don’t you tell me
Like your brain ?!? 🧠
So do you want your "Ark" to be the only Ark in existence? I guess the real one would put yours to shame. Are you really religious or just use the Ark as a money maker?
When the floodwaters reached 14 cubits above the highest mountains into the death zone the oxygen ran out and the temperature plummeted well below zero. How did the animals, plants, insects and humans survive inside the Ark?
Answer:
They didn't.
If they didn't survive, you would not be saying they didn't, because the world would be devoid of humans and animals. Geology all over the world proves there was a flood. Rocks do not bend. Polystrate fossils would be non existent.
Carbon 14 proves anything with carbon 14 in it, can not be more than between 100,000 and 200,000 old. because of its half life. It's so unreliable that's why there is a discrepancy in the dates. That rules out billions of years on its own.
😂😂😂 spot on
Magic!
This story is mentioned in the Quran, the Bible and the Torah.
can you invite me?
pls reply