Bruce Rivers CLR channel is great on the self snitching thing. He has a good hip hoppy intro and outro tune too. Nearly as good as your Socrates quotes.
That's mind blowing that the rap/drill guys also put tgeir specific, real life crimes in the rap /drill lyrics. There are many people in prison in the US who are there becase they put their actual violet crimes they committed.
7:53 Context for question: "In Digity's court cases police presented his music as fi- as evidence, his lyrics specifically. This strategy highlights the potential for drill lyrics to be seen more than artistic expression but possible admission of criminal activity or incitement to violence..." 8:36 "What do you think?" "Do you think it's fair for the police to use that evidence to make those uh proposals?" I think fairness is independent of the general action of police/prosecutors/defence using an artist's lyrics as evidence. To me, any 'fairness' concerning the use of an artists lyrics as evidence is contingent on the validity of the evidence presented in trial being proportional to the quality of the evidence and the methodology used to evaluate the evidence. The term "incitement to violence" to me seems succeptible to vague interpretation and I am curious how relevant decision makers determine the criteria that determines if statement comes under "incitement to violence". I can imagine a murder to have scribbled lyrics in a journal that contain specific details of a crime that only investigators and the perpetuator of the murder would likely know. This would be an example of good quality evidence, whereas lyrics like 'I killed him' would be poor quality evidence. Additionally, I think it's very reasonable to tactically deploy a subjects own words (be they lyrics or other samples) during a targeted moment in an interrogation or interview to see if any additional pertinent information or inquiry avenues can be obtained. This reminds me of a RUclips video titled "SADISTS love YOUR pain" by Deception Detective. Deception Detective ("an attorney trained in statement analysis") said "I think she has" "admitted to being a sadist" when analyzing a music video of a song by Jada Pinket Smith titled "Bleed All Over Me" citing her lyrics; "I love your pain and how it makes me feel inside I love your pain and how it opens you so wide And I love the way you bleed all over me, all over me I crave your pain and how it soaks me in" saying; "Well if Jada wrote the song, then you can imagine she put a little bit of herself into her lyrics". Clarification; DD was not using her lyrics to conclude Jada is a sadist as DD previously concluded that Jada is a sadist which supported by DD's term "admitted". I've heard a discipline called statement analysis can be used to assist in police investigations. Do you have any specific thoughts or insights concerning analyzing a subjects language to assess and interview patients?
You're stupid if you think you can admit to crimes and publisize it and not get police attention! Young lads looking up to gangs from Chicago, New York etc. shows their lack of direct positive role models
Bruce Rivers CLR channel is great on the self snitching thing. He has a good hip hoppy intro and outro tune too. Nearly as good as your Socrates quotes.
I was thinking about that too.
That's mind blowing that the rap/drill guys also put tgeir specific, real life crimes in the rap /drill lyrics.
There are many people in prison in the US who are there becase they put their actual violet crimes they committed.
This is only what's happening in a situation like this
Aye! Dig your haircut!
The snake, the rat, the cat, the dog.
How you gonna see em if you're living in a fog?
I've already bought your book.
awesome. thanks
7:53 Context for question:
"In Digity's court cases police presented his music as fi- as evidence, his lyrics specifically. This strategy highlights the potential for drill lyrics to be seen more than artistic expression but possible admission of criminal activity or incitement to violence..."
8:36 "What do you think?" "Do you think it's fair for the police to use that evidence to make those uh proposals?"
I think fairness is independent of the general action of police/prosecutors/defence using an artist's lyrics as evidence. To me, any 'fairness' concerning the use of an artists lyrics as evidence is contingent on the validity of the evidence presented in trial being proportional to the quality of the evidence and the methodology used to evaluate the evidence. The term "incitement to violence" to me seems succeptible to vague interpretation and I am curious how relevant decision makers determine the criteria that determines if statement comes under "incitement to violence".
I can imagine a murder to have scribbled lyrics in a journal that contain specific details of a crime that only investigators and the perpetuator of the murder would likely know. This would be an example of good quality evidence, whereas lyrics like 'I killed him' would be poor quality evidence.
Additionally, I think it's very reasonable to tactically deploy a subjects own words (be they lyrics or other samples) during a targeted moment in an interrogation or interview to see if any additional pertinent information or inquiry avenues can be obtained.
This reminds me of a RUclips video titled "SADISTS love YOUR pain" by Deception Detective.
Deception Detective ("an attorney trained in statement analysis") said "I think she has" "admitted to being a sadist" when analyzing a music video of a song by Jada Pinket Smith titled "Bleed All Over Me" citing her lyrics; "I love your pain and how it makes me feel inside I love your pain and how it opens you so wide And I love the way you bleed all over me, all over me I crave your pain and how it soaks me in" saying; "Well if Jada wrote the song, then you can imagine she put a little bit of herself into her lyrics". Clarification; DD was not using her lyrics to conclude Jada is a sadist as DD previously concluded that Jada is a sadist which supported by DD's term "admitted".
I've heard a discipline called statement analysis can be used to assist in police investigations. Do you have any specific thoughts or insights concerning analyzing a subjects language to assess and interview patients?
Virtual Psychiatry
I used to love street fighter.
You're stupid if you think you can admit to crimes and publisize it and not get police attention! Young lads looking up to gangs from Chicago, New York etc. shows their lack of direct positive role models