When I started watching your videos, I could only dream of becoming a pilot. Now I am doing the a320 rating and I am very happy that you are still here and still I get a lot of important info. Thanks man for all the videos until now. Keep going. Safe flights.
Having worked as an aircraft refueller. I can tell you that the airbus fuel system is years ahead of Boeing. It’s superior how it balances & distributes the fuel between the wings and the centre tanks.
Don't forget that long before the A320, Concorde had fly-by-wire flight controls. Not implemented by programmable digital computers, but using analog "computers". And it had flight envelope protection. The controls had feed-back, and were physically connected like on Boeing. A marvel of engineering, designed in the 60s :-)
For an aircraft design that is over 30 years old, the Boeing engineers got the 777 FBW system absolutely perfect. You are still in control of the aircraft (Boeing philosophy) but the aircraft will try and “fight back” against your attempts to do anything beyond the flight envelope. It is also a dream to fly and feels as light as a feather at all weights and configurations.
First non commercial vehicle is Apollo 9 Lunar Module which has a Fly By Wire control system or Lunar Landing Research/Training Vehicle on which astronauts were trained.
Thanks for this video. I read somewhere that the laws of the fbw between boeing and airbus are different. And that airbus planes have a waiver from the faa to operate in the us.
As far as I know the V2 was controlled electrically. But not "nontrolled". I think the wonderfull looking Avro Vulcan was the first full FBW aircraft but also the latest versions of the B-17 had FBW but only for HDG+ALT hold.
Thanks. I love your content. It is a great explanation , It's understandable, I can watch it over again . It's been what I've asked for , understand flight control.
After 30,000 hours flying a multitude of Boeings and Airbus, my choice is Boeing. The reason I chose Boeing is situational awareness. The side stick is great but it isn't mirrored on the non flying pilot side. Even if it were, the movements are so slight, it would be difficult to determine what the flying pilot was doing. In a boeing you have the old faithful yoke. It's easy to see wht the flying pilot is doing and if necessary either help on the controls or at the very least see what he/she is doing. The auto throttles don't move in the Bus. Again, no situational awareness. Seeing the throttles move is in my opinion essential. You can't cross control an Airbus. The side stick controls RATE of turn, not ANGLE of bank. So, in a crosswind, you either time kicking out the crab to land straight or land in a crab. In a Boeing you can actually do a forward slip just like you did when you were learning to fly if you are more than 60 years old you will understand. It works in all Boeings except the 747 because of the outboard engine and the 737 with the curb feeler winlets. The only thing I like about the Airbus is the dinner tray.
I am no pilot, but i see Mentour Pilot has the same complaint often about the input not being felt in the other stick and that could have saved some events. However i do appreciate Airbus hard laws or whatever it is called has saved people where the pilots would have caused their demise.
@@rasta77-x7o triggering any of the airbus normal law protections is very very rare, and if a pilot does do that he or she has some serious explaining to do
@@rasta77-x7oUPRT is mandatory on every airplane even airplanes with stall prevention systems like Airbus because someone managed to stall and crashed an A320. Airbus’s prevention mostly only works if you actually know how to deal with it
@@Inquisite1031At least the pilot get a chance to explain themselves in an Airbus… Do the same in Boeing and usually the investigators had to dig through the wreckage to find the explanations…
Basically the difference between flying a boeing vs flying an airbus as a pilot is like if you're driving a sports car vs driving a grand tourer. A sports car will giver better performance, better handling and more driving enjoyment to a driver but a grand tourer will give better comfort and control when driving long distances in public roads at whatever speed limits there are. There is no wrong answer in terms of which is better or worse. It basically depends on personal preference and the situation.
Quiz: If you take the question word by word, the Boeing B-17 was the first non-commercial vehicle to use the fly-by-wire technology. That's because its autopilot wasn't mechanically connected to the control surfaces. It was electrically connected to the actuators. That autopilot was simple and could only provide a stable flight straight ahead. But fly-by-wire technology was used. The first vehicle using a fly-by-wire system to control its movements by pilots was the Avro Vulcan 1952, 12 ahead of the moon lander.
I knew a guy back in the 90's who was an A and P mechanic at the UAL base at San Francisco Int. I asked him once which aircraft were easer to do maintenance and parts replacement on. Boeing or Airbus. Without hesitation he said Airbus.
F 16 was the first to use a side stick. A limited fly by wire was used in the Lockheed 1011 TriStar. The TriStar was very sophisticated with computer management and was the first airliner to fly from takeoff to landing under autopilot control completely. TriStar came 2 years before A300. Would have been 3 years earlier if RollsRoyce had not had financial problems developing the engines.
Bigger deflections of the control surfaces are needed at low speed due to less air flowing over the surfaces. In Airbus the computer compensates for this so you only have to make small corrections
Looking at pilots landing a 737, there seems to be a lot of this. I believe it is down to the lack of FBW, instead being old fashioned cables and pulleys. These mean the flight controls are a lot more sensitive. Try that in a 777 and you’ll snap the wings off.
airbus and his "fly by computer" that is my definition. for "fly by wire" flight controls should ALWAYS represent of real position of control surfaces. And if computer decides it's not safe, force movement of yoke/stick is activated, like stick-pusher do, in many modern aircraft. that is a way I see that. and airbus's "fly by computer" proof safety of that system.
Awesome explanation but i don't understand is if a plane loses all hydraulic systems why doesn't the airplane manufacturer us electric actuators for the main flight controls so the pilots can still control the plane to make an emergency landing....prime example flight 232 when the #2 engine fan disk blew apart and ruptured all the hydraulic lines the plane was uncontrollable and crashed landed in Suiox city Iowa
787, A380 and A350 already do this. The 787 has Electro Mechanical Actuators that will power 2 spoilers per wing and the trimmable horizontal stabilizer if all 3 systems fail. The A380 and A350 has Electro Backup Hydraulic Actuators that will power some spoilers, elevators, horizontal stabilizer and rudder if the 2 hydraulic systems fail. They are the only aircraft after the 737 that can survive all hydraulic systems dead provided one engine is running that is...If all engines are dead with no RAT (and electricity in the 787 because the batteries can power the controls with no hydraulics for a limited time only), only then are you doomed on those 3 as well.
because the chances of that happing is very very slim, and to put on electrical actuators that can move flight controls that big would be a massive undertaking, i always tell this to people who think they have great ideas, if u can come up with an idea, then the people who design that also came up with it, and if its not implemented its because there are hurdles that u are not smart enough to realize.
please question what are the most common frequencies used in Atlantic region i mean from north america to the south Argentina and the caribean i have in my book 124.1 133.0 133.4 199.6 124.0thoes are fiew that i have do you the others
I have a 12 year old son who is fascinated by Aeroplanes, we have tried both the 737 and A320 Fixed based sims, not having flown anything before we both thought the A320 was the most natural to fly for a novice. I think it comes down to are you really flying the A320 or just there for the ride, the Boeing needs a lot more pilot input. I didn’t know the 777 was fly by wire, I thought all Boeing were traditional mechanical flight control mechanisms.
Because a novice can tell what is the most "natural" (whatever that's supposed to mean) way an aircraft is supposed to fly....🤦🏼♂️ And also, of course they design aircraft controls based on what is easier for people who have no idea about flying! So, very good point from your side
Well, I actually have both a Trustmaster Boeing yoke and the Trustmaster Airbus(Scarebus) sidestick for using my MSFS 2020 simulator and I very much prefer flying with the Boeing yoke because it's much more forgiving than with the sidestick if you happen to do a bad abrupt move! I have a disability in my hands which makes me to get tremors so I only use the sidestick for steering when I'm taxiing on the ground. I don't have pedals, yet. I am going to get pedals soon and that will finish my simulator cockpit. I already have the thrust quadrant(the Thrustmaster Airbus(Scarebus) because it's better quality than the Thrustmaster Boing thrust quadrant). My VR headset completes my flying experience beautifully!
There is no comparison B/W B-747 Control Column & Atari Joystick (with due respect). During take off, when you pull B-747 C/C to rotate, you move back in your seat & face the sky, as you are flying yourself like a bird. Long live Boeing 747
@@flywithcaptainjoeyou got me, my viewing was interrupted by work :( Having flown both, do you have a preference on the control schemes? Not on FBW, but yoke vs sidestick?
u need to be type rated on any aircraft but yes, even as an airbus pilot u still need to know how to trim an aircraft, u cannot become a pilot without knowing how to do such a fundamental task, and the auto trim is just about the biggest difference in the two aircraft, everything else is very similar, even the different FMA modes are very similar just different names, like OP Descent on an airbus is just VNAV SPD on a Boeing etc etc.
@@tomstravels520 to dual input a 777 u have to be physically stronger than the other pilot, and also its very very clear if the other pilot is putting is hands on the controls, in an airbus it is in a small corner to the side and in a dark cockpit and at night u can easily miss it, u cant on the 777
10,000 hours Airbus Boeing FBW 3000..Boeing for me im allowed to be treated as a pilot. Similarly the Boeing failure mentality is LIGHTYEARS better than ECAM and the overly regulated failure management Airbus inflict on crews. From a failure management perspective its not even close..
One question that could be asked is, if there were an EMP attack, like an enhanced EMP nuclear weapon exploded at a cerrtain distance from an aircraft, which type of aircraft do you think would survive better, the Boeing or the Airbus(Scarebus)?
Hi Captain Joe, I am a plane spotter and an Av geek enthusiast on RUclips, I have a question for you: Why are you wearing 3 stripes and sitting in the left hand seat, while every Captain is wearing 4 stripes except for you, can you explain?
Air France 447 could have used that audible simultaneous use warning. Even with that I don't care for the idea of side sticks away from direct easy view of the other pilot.
Remember when joe was an Airbus pilot?
When you have flown both types, you will understand.
@craig7083 wth
@craig7083 i literally just said " remember when joe was an airbus pilot" referencing to the time when he was flying for AirBerlin
Yes, with Air Berlin. Now many years ago.
Yes air Berlin I'm an OG subscriber
Raja is great! Keep her on board.
When I started watching your videos, I could only dream of becoming a pilot. Now I am doing the a320 rating and I am very happy that you are still here and still I get a lot of important info. Thanks man for all the videos until now. Keep going. Safe flights.
Great to hear!
Having worked as an aircraft refueller. I can tell you that the airbus fuel system is years ahead of Boeing. It’s superior how it balances & distributes the fuel between the wings and the centre tanks.
Boeing has a philosophy “if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it”.
You mean the Philosophie of don't spend money....on nothing
Don't forget that long before the A320, Concorde had fly-by-wire flight controls. Not implemented by programmable digital computers, but using analog "computers". And it had flight envelope protection. The controls had feed-back, and were physically connected like on Boeing. A marvel of engineering, designed in the 60s :-)
Thats not surprising, considering aerospatiale (manufacturer of concorde) eventually merged to form airbus.
Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV) 1964. First to use fly by wire.
Exactly
You beat me to it... Awesome piece of technology!
Also known as the Flying Bedstead, or the contraption that almost killed Neil Armstrong.
I was thinking the Space Shuttle. Close, but a bit later on.
For an aircraft design that is over 30 years old, the Boeing engineers got the 777 FBW system absolutely perfect. You are still in control of the aircraft (Boeing philosophy) but the aircraft will try and “fight back” against your attempts to do anything beyond the flight envelope. It is also a dream to fly and feels as light as a feather at all weights and configurations.
First non commercial vehicle is Apollo 9 Lunar Module which has a Fly By Wire control system or Lunar Landing Research/Training Vehicle on which astronauts were trained.
the first "fly by wire" technology is radio-controlled boat in the late 1890s
So nice to see Raja :) And thank you guys for showing so many technical aspects!
Thank you!
Thanks for this video. I read somewhere that the laws of the fbw between boeing and airbus are different. And that airbus planes have a waiver from the faa to operate in the us.
Thank you Joe and Raja! Would an Airbus side stick with the feedback of a Boeing yoke be the ideal hybrid?
As far as I know the V2 was controlled electrically. But not "nontrolled". I think the wonderfull looking Avro Vulcan was the first full FBW aircraft but also the latest versions of the B-17 had FBW but only for HDG+ALT hold.
Thank you very much!🙂👍 Very educating.🙂
I WANT A SIM LIKE THAT
Very interesting video👌👌👌
THAT'S what I call a CaptainJoe video.
🙂👍
17:29 answer is Avro Canada CF-105
impressive knowledge
Thanks. I love your content. It is a great explanation ,
It's understandable, I can watch it over again .
It's been what I've asked for , understand flight control.
After 30,000 hours flying a multitude of Boeings and Airbus, my choice is Boeing. The reason I chose Boeing is situational awareness. The side stick is great but it isn't mirrored on the non flying pilot side. Even if it were, the movements are so slight, it would be difficult to determine what the flying pilot was doing. In a boeing you have the old faithful yoke. It's easy to see wht the flying pilot is doing and if necessary either help on the controls or at the very least see what he/she is doing. The auto throttles don't move in the Bus. Again, no situational awareness. Seeing the throttles move is in my opinion essential. You can't cross control an Airbus. The side stick controls RATE of turn, not ANGLE of bank. So, in a crosswind, you either time kicking out the crab to land straight or land in a crab. In a Boeing you can actually do a forward slip just like you did when you were learning to fly if you are more than 60 years old you will understand. It works in all Boeings except the 747 because of the outboard engine and the 737 with the curb feeler winlets. The only thing I like about the Airbus is the dinner tray.
I am no pilot, but i see Mentour Pilot has the same complaint often about the input not being felt in the other stick and that could have saved some events.
However i do appreciate Airbus hard laws or whatever it is called has saved people where the pilots would have caused their demise.
@@rasta77-x7o triggering any of the airbus normal law protections is very very rare, and if a pilot does do that he or she has some serious explaining to do
@@rasta77-x7oUPRT is mandatory on every airplane even airplanes with stall prevention systems like Airbus because someone managed to stall and crashed an A320. Airbus’s prevention mostly only works if you actually know how to deal with it
@@Inquisite1031At least the pilot get a chance to explain themselves in an Airbus…
Do the same in Boeing and usually the investigators had to dig through the wreckage to find the explanations…
@@tonamg53 heard of Air France 447?
Great video, very educating. great job. Keep it up.
nice one love it
Basically the difference between flying a boeing vs flying an airbus as a pilot is like if you're driving a sports car vs driving a grand tourer. A sports car will giver better performance, better handling and more driving enjoyment to a driver but a grand tourer will give better comfort and control when driving long distances in public roads at whatever speed limits there are.
There is no wrong answer in terms of which is better or worse. It basically depends on personal preference and the situation.
Quiz: If you take the question word by word, the Boeing B-17 was the first non-commercial vehicle to use the fly-by-wire technology. That's because its autopilot wasn't mechanically connected to the control surfaces. It was electrically connected to the actuators. That autopilot was simple and could only provide a stable flight straight ahead. But fly-by-wire technology was used.
The first vehicle using a fly-by-wire system to control its movements by pilots was the Avro Vulcan 1952, 12 ahead of the moon lander.
On the quiz-part: ..is it the F-16 fighter? //btw, Thanks for interesting video Raja and Joe
That is what I thought
I think the luna Apollo 9 Vehikel was first ❕🤔
Or the AVRO Vulcan 1952 ❔❕🤷🏻♂️
Awesome video ❤
The very newest A320NEO’s only have 4x flight control computers instead of 7
I knew a guy back in the 90's who was an A and P mechanic at the UAL base at San Francisco Int. I asked him once which aircraft were easer to do maintenance and parts replacement on. Boeing or Airbus. Without hesitation he said Airbus.
Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow is the 1st non commercial FBW
The first non-commercial vehicle to use fly-by-wire technology was the Apollo Lunar Module, developed by NASA in the 1960s
Airbus any day!
The general dynamics F-16 was the first the Fly by wire aircraft
F 16 was the first to use a side stick. A limited fly by wire was used in the Lockheed 1011 TriStar. The TriStar was very sophisticated with computer management and was the first airliner to fly from takeoff to landing under autopilot control completely. TriStar came 2 years before A300. Would have been 3 years earlier if RollsRoyce had not had financial problems developing the engines.
I believe the F-117 Nighthawk was the first full fly-by-wire plane. Its non-commercial :)=. Otherwise nice video👍
Can't have been. Concorde was the First fly by wire Passenger jet, and that was built in the 60s, F117 wasn't built until the 80s.
@@GVTSounds Concorde was a commercial aircraft.
The space shuttle.
The first? The concorde! Or non commercial is the F16!
I love boeing but I love airbus more haha they are both good really good
I think the first none commercial aircraft with FBW was the F16 Falcon
I guess NASA's Digital Fly By Wire F-8 with the fancy 80's font using the modified Apollo Guidance Computer?
next question why is it that when you are landing you push and pull the yoke and twisting it inn and out then right and left in a constant movement
Bigger deflections of the control surfaces are needed at low speed due to less air flowing over the surfaces. In Airbus the computer compensates for this so you only have to make small corrections
They have to make adjustments to maintain their glideslope ant the centerline, especially if they're dealing with crosswinds.
Looking at pilots landing a 737, there seems to be a lot of this. I believe it is down to the lack of FBW, instead being old fashioned cables and pulleys. These mean the flight controls are a lot more sensitive. Try that in a 777 and you’ll snap the wings off.
If I can I choose a Boeing to travel.
airbus and his "fly by computer" that is my definition.
for "fly by wire" flight controls should ALWAYS represent of real position of control surfaces. And if computer decides it's not safe, force movement of yoke/stick is activated, like stick-pusher do, in many modern aircraft.
that is a way I see that.
and airbus's "fly by computer" proof safety of that system.
👍👏❤️ excelente video 🫶🏻
Boeing all the way!
I WANT TO BE AN EMIRATES PILOT. JOE YOU ARE MY MOTIVATION.
Ofcourse Airbus... 🙌
I flew yoke first then transitioned to the side stick. A damn kid can manually fly the airbus no joke..
AVRO Vulcan was the First Fly by wire plane
Air France Flight 447, an Airbus A330, crashed largely because both pilots were making sidestick inputs at the same time.
Awesome explanation but i don't understand is if a plane loses all hydraulic systems why doesn't the airplane manufacturer us electric actuators for the main flight controls so the pilots can still control the plane to make an emergency landing....prime example flight 232 when the #2 engine fan disk blew apart and ruptured all the hydraulic lines the plane was uncontrollable and crashed landed in Suiox city Iowa
787, A380 and A350 already do this. The 787 has Electro Mechanical Actuators that will power 2 spoilers per wing and the trimmable horizontal stabilizer if all 3 systems fail. The A380 and A350 has Electro Backup Hydraulic Actuators that will power some spoilers, elevators, horizontal stabilizer and rudder if the 2 hydraulic systems fail. They are the only aircraft after the 737 that can survive all hydraulic systems dead provided one engine is running that is...If all engines are dead with no RAT (and electricity in the 787 because the batteries can power the controls with no hydraulics for a limited time only), only then are you doomed on those 3 as well.
because the chances of that happing is very very slim, and to put on electrical actuators that can move flight controls that big would be a massive undertaking, i always tell this to people who think they have great ideas, if u can come up with an idea, then the people who design that also came up with it, and if its not implemented its because there are hurdles that u are not smart enough to realize.
I was gonna say the 1957 Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow
Robert Pearson landed his Boeing at Gimli after losing both engines using Fly By Seat Of Pants....
please question what are the most common frequencies used in Atlantic region i mean from north america to the south Argentina and the caribean i have in my book 124.1 133.0 133.4 199.6 124.0thoes are fiew that i have do you the others
Crossing that Atlantic, the most common frequencies listened to are 123.4 and 121.5.
Só faltou a legenda em português 😢
I think it was the X15
Lunar Vehicle is teh right answer?
Captain Joe's videos want me to want to abandon my career and take up a pilot training program.
I'm a (Ret) tank commander, I can drive and shoot a tank. ;)
Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow
Raja's native language is German, right?
Haha yup 😅👍
Airbus tells the pilot what to do, Boeing pilots tell the plane what to do.
Bus is far more ergonomic and comfortable as a narrow isle Aircraft Cockpit.
The 747 is so durable and tough, the US president trust it.
I have a 12 year old son who is fascinated by Aeroplanes, we have tried both the 737 and A320 Fixed based sims, not having flown anything before we both thought the A320 was the most natural to fly for a novice. I think it comes down to are you really flying the A320 or just there for the ride, the Boeing needs a lot more pilot input.
I didn’t know the 777 was fly by wire, I thought all Boeing were traditional mechanical flight control mechanisms.
The 777 and 787 are fly-by-wire, but in a different way as Airbus.
Because a novice can tell what is the most "natural" (whatever that's supposed to mean) way an aircraft is supposed to fly....🤦🏼♂️ And also, of course they design aircraft controls based on what is easier for people who have no idea about flying! So, very good point from your side
u still need to trim the 777 so yeah a novice will still struggle with it
The 777 feels light as a feather because of its FBW, even at MTOW.
Side stick of course….
👍🏾
F16
Well, I actually have both a Trustmaster Boeing yoke and the Trustmaster Airbus(Scarebus) sidestick for using my MSFS 2020 simulator and I very much prefer flying with the Boeing yoke because it's much more forgiving than with the sidestick if you happen to do a bad abrupt move! I have a disability in my hands which makes me to get tremors so I only use the sidestick for steering when I'm taxiing on the ground. I don't have pedals, yet. I am going to get pedals soon and that will finish my simulator cockpit. I already have the thrust quadrant(the Thrustmaster Airbus(Scarebus) because it's better quality than the Thrustmaster Boing thrust quadrant). My VR headset completes my flying experience beautifully!
The first vehicle is cybertruck from tesla
Hi 👋🏻
It’s called a scarebus for a reason. Pilots fly the jet.
W pilots.
I bet it was a rocket out of a Apollo mission
This like comparing apples to peaches. Why don't you compare the A320 to the 737?
He is now on the side of Boeing .
There is no comparison B/W B-747 Control Column & Atari Joystick (with due respect). During take off, when you pull B-747 C/C to rotate, you move back in your seat & face the sky, as you are flying yourself like a bird. Long live Boeing 747
The only answer that is correct is Boeing yoke, not the joystick of the Airbus.
"why doesn't Boeing just convert the yoke movements into electronic signals for FBW?".
777 and 787: are we frickin jokes to you?
Classic example of impatience😂Watch the full video before commenting😘
@@flywithcaptainjoeyou got me, my viewing was interrupted by work :(
Having flown both, do you have a preference on the control schemes? Not on FBW, but yoke vs sidestick?
F-16
Can a Boeing pilot fly an Airbus plane? And vice versa.
Boeing to Airbus? Easy
Airbus to Boeing? Almost hard
u need to be type rated on any aircraft but yes, even as an airbus pilot u still need to know how to trim an aircraft, u cannot become a pilot without knowing how to do such a fundamental task, and the auto trim is just about the biggest difference in the two aircraft, everything else is very similar, even the different FMA modes are very similar just different names, like OP Descent on an airbus is just VNAV SPD on a Boeing etc etc.
Boeing definitely has better flight controls: is visible, tandem yoke, feedback.
Airbus (A): The dual input on fly by wire is risky.
*The Bluetooth device disconnected*
Air France 11 proved you can dual input a Boeing 777 and be none the wiser
@@tomstravels520 to dual input a 777 u have to be physically stronger than the other pilot, and also its very very clear if the other pilot is putting is hands on the controls, in an airbus it is in a small corner to the side and in a dark cockpit and at night u can easily miss it, u cant on the 777
@@Inquisite1031 well go and read up on Air France 11…….because they managed it
@tomstravels520 that's not dual input that's bad CRM, they are not the same, u cannot dual input a Boeing yoke period, it doesn't work that way.
Where is Michele???? Joe she has best colabs with you only! ❤ @Dutchpilot
F-16?
10,000 hours Airbus Boeing FBW 3000..Boeing for me im allowed to be treated as a pilot. Similarly the Boeing failure mentality is LIGHTYEARS better than ECAM and the overly regulated failure management Airbus inflict on crews. From a failure management perspective its not even close..
One question that could be asked is, if there were an EMP attack, like an enhanced EMP nuclear weapon exploded at a cerrtain distance from an aircraft, which type of aircraft do you think would survive better, the Boeing or the Airbus(Scarebus)?
First 😂😂😂😂
Hi Captain Joe, I am a plane spotter and an Av geek enthusiast on RUclips, I have a question for you:
Why are you wearing 3 stripes and sitting in the left hand seat, while every Captain is wearing 4 stripes except for you, can you explain?
Air France 447 could have used that audible simultaneous use warning. Even with that I don't care for the idea of side sticks away from direct easy view of the other pilot.
That warning sounded on AF447 but not very often as it was often cancelled by the stall warning. See Mentour Pilots video on the accident.
Embraer is the best after the 747 ofcourse 😂
Tesla cyber truck😂😂
Boeing.
not Boeing
i am so verry sorry confusion cause you bought by switching from one to another i did not understand nothing at all
raja is so beautiful im struggling to focus on the lesson at hand here 😅
Yoke is much more intuitive.
F-16?
F-16