Which AIRLINE JET has the better FLIGHT CONTROLS? Explained by Captain Joe and Raja

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 347

  • @Echo_Lima
    @Echo_Lima 20 дней назад +50

    When I started watching your videos, I could only dream of becoming a pilot. Now I am doing the a320 rating and I am very happy that you are still here and still I get a lot of important info. Thanks man for all the videos until now. Keep going. Safe flights.

    • @flywithcaptainjoe
      @flywithcaptainjoe  20 дней назад +18

      Great to hear!

    • @taniaivanirdeoliveira5620
      @taniaivanirdeoliveira5620 20 дней назад +3

      Waw, joe com seus sorrisos e inspiração nos faz acreditar e realizar sonhos de verdade.
      Amo seus vídeos explicativos desejo felicidades a você joe🫡✈️🙏🏻🫰

    • @Dirk-van-den-Berg
      @Dirk-van-den-Berg 13 дней назад

      Are you trained on the entire 320family? Ceo's and neo's?

    • @Echo_Lima
      @Echo_Lima 13 дней назад

      @@Dirk-van-den-Berg yes

    • @Dirk-van-den-Berg
      @Dirk-van-den-Berg 13 дней назад

      Question. Let's say you have been flying on the 320ceo for some time, and the airline wants to schedule you for the 321neo. Do you require additional training or can you just hop into the other cockpit and start setting up?

  • @EmilioGameair
    @EmilioGameair 20 дней назад +223

    Remember when joe was an Airbus pilot?

    • @craig7083
      @craig7083 20 дней назад +6

      When you have flown both types, you will understand.

    • @EmilioGameair
      @EmilioGameair 20 дней назад +2

      @craig7083 wth

    • @EmilioGameair
      @EmilioGameair 20 дней назад +11

      @craig7083 i literally just said " remember when joe was an airbus pilot" referencing to the time when he was flying for AirBerlin

    • @Hans_R._Wahl
      @Hans_R._Wahl 20 дней назад +7

      Yes, with Air Berlin. Now many years ago.

    • @lp3ligr0l
      @lp3ligr0l 20 дней назад +7

      Yes air Berlin I'm an OG subscriber

  • @ealibert
    @ealibert 20 дней назад +65

    Don't forget that long before the A320, Concorde had fly-by-wire flight controls. Not implemented by programmable digital computers, but using analog "computers". And it had flight envelope protection. The controls had feed-back, and were physically connected like on Boeing. A marvel of engineering, designed in the 60s :-)

    • @ZK-APA
      @ZK-APA 20 дней назад +14

      Thats not surprising, considering aerospatiale (manufacturer of concorde) eventually merged to form airbus.

    • @dcniner0187
      @dcniner0187 16 дней назад +6

      In the mid 1950’s the Canadian Avro Arrow CF105 had analogue fly by wire. dcniner01

    • @nupagadii5834
      @nupagadii5834 12 дней назад +5

      @@dcniner0187 Correct, the VERY First one ....
      Thank you for bring it up ...

    • @chrissmith2114
      @chrissmith2114 10 дней назад

      TSR-2 also had fly by wire

    • @chrissmith2114
      @chrissmith2114 10 дней назад

      @@ZK-APA BAC did most of Concord ( with no 'e' ) including engines and wings and that miraculous variable engine intake that allowed the Concord to supercruise was also UK. BAC also had experience of fly-by-wire from TSR-2, and the wing from Concord came from Vulcan nuclear bomber. It was only money that prevented UK from building Concord on its own. Never forget that France killed Concord with that big crash - bad maintenance, fuel tanks too full ( should have always had an air gap to prevent hydraulic rupture of tanks, and also the plane was overloaded.

  • @English.Andy1
    @English.Andy1 20 дней назад +65

    Having worked as an aircraft refueller. I can tell you that the airbus fuel system is years ahead of Boeing. It’s superior how it balances & distributes the fuel between the wings and the centre tanks.

    • @danielaramburo7648
      @danielaramburo7648 20 дней назад +1

      Boeing has a philosophy “if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it”.

    • @nobodyinteresting9967
      @nobodyinteresting9967 20 дней назад +12

      You mean the Philosophie of don't spend money....on nothing

    • @itsme-vw5yo
      @itsme-vw5yo 17 дней назад +3

      ​@@danielaramburo7648 just like the apple company. I mean what's up with the companies of the United States settling for less?

    • @6thdayblue59
      @6thdayblue59 14 дней назад

      Very Interesting mate. I do love reading the comments and seeing how things are in real life !!

    • @toffonardi7037
      @toffonardi7037 14 дней назад +2

      Airbus is years ahead on EVERYTHING over boeing

  • @cesarbonifacio8799
    @cesarbonifacio8799 13 дней назад +5

    The Embraer 190 E1 family is hybrid too, only ailerons are powered by cables, all other controls are fly by wire including the nose weel steering, that is called Steer By Wire.
    The new E2 is all fly by wire.

  • @EdOeuna
    @EdOeuna 20 дней назад +25

    For an aircraft design that is over 30 years old, the Boeing engineers got the 777 FBW system absolutely perfect. You are still in control of the aircraft (Boeing philosophy) but the aircraft will try and “fight back” against your attempts to do anything beyond the flight envelope. It is also a dream to fly and feels as light as a feather at all weights and configurations.

    • @keeperofoddknowledgesociet3264
      @keeperofoddknowledgesociet3264 12 дней назад

      Two caveats here. 1) the United 777 flying from Hawaii to the mainland almost crashed due to miscommunication b tween pilots (FO did not set the flaps properly) and was recovered by the pilot, I wonder if it was a 330 or 350 if that would have happened? I doubt it 2) AF447 that caused due to incorrect behavior after stall, apparently it was not in normal law as it should have overridden the pilots nose up attitude.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 12 дней назад +4

      @@keeperofoddknowledgesociet3264- that 777 nearly crashed because the pilots, primarily the FO, just couldn’t fly the aircraft. He made some serious errors that shows gross incompetence. I think one of the issues with Boeing philosophy is that the pilots need to be well trained and competent. Having untrained or incompetent pilots in a Boeing just isn’t a good combination.

    • @john_hind
      @john_hind 2 дня назад

      There is a 737MAX shaped elephant in the room right now!

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 2 дня назад

      @@john_hind - nothing wrong with the max if you actually know how to fly it.

    • @john_hind
      @john_hind 2 дня назад

      @@EdOeuna Except that Max's MCAS was specifically designed to obviate the need to train pilots to know how to actually fly the plane. And then it somehow got classified 'non-essential' so it was subject to a single point failure which would cause it to 'fight back' against the pilot's attempts not to crash into the ground! Aside from this, nothing wrong with it!

  • @rkspotter
    @rkspotter 20 дней назад +23

    So nice to see Raja :) And thank you guys for showing so many technical aspects!

  • @connork5339
    @connork5339 20 дней назад +6

    I knew a guy back in the 90's who was an A and P mechanic at the UAL base at San Francisco Int. I asked him once which aircraft were easer to do maintenance and parts replacement on. Boeing or Airbus. Without hesitation he said Airbus.

  • @JimmyHendrixJR
    @JimmyHendrixJR 20 дней назад +63

    Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV) 1964. First to use fly by wire.

    • @klssn34
      @klssn34 20 дней назад +5

      Exactly

    • @MrMartinae06
      @MrMartinae06 20 дней назад +5

      You beat me to it... Awesome piece of technology!

    •  20 дней назад +2

      Also known as the Flying Bedstead, or the contraption that almost killed Neil Armstrong.

    • @MikeDCWeld
      @MikeDCWeld 20 дней назад +2

      I was thinking the Space Shuttle. Close, but a bit later on.

    • @stargazer2504
      @stargazer2504 18 дней назад +1

      I knew it was an early space flight vehicle, I was thinking Mercury or Gemini.

  • @ZK-APA
    @ZK-APA 20 дней назад +4

    Basically the difference between flying a boeing vs flying an airbus as a pilot is like if you're driving a sports car vs driving a grand tourer. A sports car will giver better performance, better handling and more driving enjoyment to a driver but a grand tourer will give better comfort and control when driving long distances in public roads at whatever speed limits there are.
    There is no wrong answer in terms of which is better or worse. It basically depends on personal preference and the situation.

  • @fuzailkhan9701
    @fuzailkhan9701 20 дней назад +7

    First non commercial vehicle is Apollo 9 Lunar Module which has a Fly By Wire control system or Lunar Landing Research/Training Vehicle on which astronauts were trained.

  • @ericho4843
    @ericho4843 20 дней назад +9

    The first non-commercial vehicle to use fly-by-wire technology was the Apollo Lunar Module, developed by NASA in the 1960s

    • @wr3661
      @wr3661 10 дней назад +1

      Apollo Lunar was in 1968. Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow preceded that in 1958

  • @elcastorgrande
    @elcastorgrande 20 дней назад +36

    Raja is great! Keep her on board.

  • @Brightsystem
    @Brightsystem 20 дней назад +3

    The first non-commercial vehicle to use fly by wire technology was the Avro CF-105 Arrow

  • @michelpassone8804
    @michelpassone8804 18 дней назад +1

    Thanks for this interesting video. I have very modest experience as a private pilot. Personally, I have always found that the "whell" gives more the impression of better control of the machine than the stick.

  • @RRC786
    @RRC786 20 дней назад +4

    Please make video on these topics-Different anntennas in airplane and all major avionics instruments in cockpit

  • @tomkam87
    @tomkam87 20 дней назад +9

    the first "fly by wire" technology is radio-controlled boat in the late 1890s

  • @Cosmozorb
    @Cosmozorb 20 дней назад +19

    THAT'S what I call a CaptainJoe video.

  • @ilovetotri23
    @ilovetotri23 19 дней назад +3

    Great video! Thank you so much for posting it!

  • @EmilePadja
    @EmilePadja 20 дней назад +3

    Great video, very educating. great job. Keep it up.

  • @henrimichelpierreplana4332
    @henrimichelpierreplana4332 20 дней назад +3

    Thanks for this video. I read somewhere that the laws of the fbw between boeing and airbus are different. And that airbus planes have a waiver from the faa to operate in the us.

  • @philipkudrna5643
    @philipkudrna5643 20 дней назад +6

    Seems Airbus should introduce feedback on the sidestick or at least self-moving throttle controls. I often hear that the lack of situational awareness in an Airbus is a disadvantage, with pilots not realizing that the plane is suddenly in direct law and they lost all protection that they usually rely upon and are suddenly overwhelmed with having to really fly the plane…

    • @mikkorenvall428
      @mikkorenvall428 18 дней назад

      Agree.. Have read and heard the same. There should be a big and clear change in something to clearify when automation is off... a beacon, or change in colour of artificial horizon or something bigger than a one little text on the dash.

    • @itsme-vw5yo
      @itsme-vw5yo 17 дней назад +1

      I hear they are developing that connected side sticks

  • @Hans_R._Wahl
    @Hans_R._Wahl 20 дней назад +4

    Thank you very much!🙂👍 Very educating.🙂

  • @michaelb1716
    @michaelb1716 20 дней назад +4

    Thank you Joe and Raja! Would an Airbus side stick with the feedback of a Boeing yoke be the ideal hybrid?

    • @jarekferenc1149
      @jarekferenc1149 18 дней назад

      An ideal hybrid would be the yoke on the CPT side, and the side sick on the FO side :-)

  • @gnomegemini2642
    @gnomegemini2642 20 дней назад +2

    As far as I know the V2 was controlled electrically. But not "nontrolled". I think the wonderfull looking Avro Vulcan was the first full FBW aircraft but also the latest versions of the B-17 had FBW but only for HDG+ALT hold.

  • @ivandivan1881
    @ivandivan1881 20 дней назад +2

    The Apollo Lunar Landing Research Vehicle was the first that used fly-by-wire with no mechanical or hydraulic backup

  • @andymunnings9109
    @andymunnings9109 15 дней назад

    "I enjoyed the session Joe and Raja. It was straight forward and educational. It is my belief? If all cockpit arrangements are explained with this open context and detail; It would invite many new interested prospect apprenticeship candidates to the field, once task and execution of command are illustrated(By graph and function) due to Flight Rules and standards."
    "Good Job, An instructor that makes learning Easy and Fun clears the muddy waters for the bedded fish to be seen; Leading one to appreciate the journey to catch that fish(Or learn a new function)after scoping from the Captain's looking glass that ease the search of the prey or proper function Stationed at the Captain's Quarters." 👍

  • @akvinodin
    @akvinodin 20 дней назад +3

    Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow is the 1st non commercial FBW

  • @lsa1641
    @lsa1641 20 дней назад +5

    Modern Airbus FBW should be compared with modern Boeing FBW system. Not with 50yo classic construction.

  • @TheLikeys
    @TheLikeys 5 дней назад

    Talking about fly by wire, I heard Airbus used a VFW 614 to test some Fly by wire systems in the A380 development. That aircraft was laying around for a long time on a parking lot of an Airbus plant in Germany

  • @anand-menon
    @anand-menon 20 дней назад +3

    Robert Pearson landed his Boeing at Gimli after losing both engines using Fly By Seat Of Pants....

  • @shamimkhan5874
    @shamimkhan5874 18 дней назад +1

    Thanks for an informative video 👍

  • @alexandruolaru8266
    @alexandruolaru8266 20 дней назад +5

    Very interesting video👌👌👌

  • @suesyn5032
    @suesyn5032 9 дней назад +1

    1960s, when NASA and the U.S. Air Force modified an F-8 Crusader or 1964 the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle (LLRV)

  • @rolfts5762
    @rolfts5762 20 дней назад +4

    On the quiz-part: ..is it the F-16 fighter? //btw, Thanks for interesting video Raja and Joe

    • @AtharvaKarthik-jw8ed
      @AtharvaKarthik-jw8ed 20 дней назад +1

      That is what I thought

    • @Ramsi-Berlin
      @Ramsi-Berlin 20 дней назад +1

      I think the luna Apollo 9 Vehikel was first ❕🤔

    • @Ramsi-Berlin
      @Ramsi-Berlin 20 дней назад

      Or the AVRO Vulcan 1952 ❔❕🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @FatimaDuarte-e5h
    @FatimaDuarte-e5h 21 день назад +5

    impressive knowledge

  • @APaviationgame814
    @APaviationgame814 20 дней назад +2

    I WANT TO BE AN EMIRATES PILOT. JOE YOU ARE MY MOTIVATION.

  • @brazeagle
    @brazeagle 16 дней назад +1

    Awesome, thanks a lot. Cheers.

  • @victorm1559
    @victorm1559 6 дней назад

    Love your videos I learn so much

  • @ericsigwald4646
    @ericsigwald4646 15 дней назад +1

    first pure electronic FBW was the Apollo Lunar Landing Training Vehicle

  • @vinnumenon102
    @vinnumenon102 3 дня назад

    Fantastic! Well done!

  • @RaysDad
    @RaysDad 20 дней назад +4

    Air France Flight 447, an Airbus A330, crashed largely because both pilots were making sidestick inputs at the same time.

    • @shi01
      @shi01 19 дней назад

      The sidesticks weren't even mentioned as a contributing factor in the accident report...

    • @RaysDad
      @RaysDad 19 дней назад +4

      @@shi01 Yes, Airbus is good at suppressing negative information. The fact remains that one pilot panicked during stall and was pulling back his sidestick while the other pilot was appropriately pushing his stick forward to lower the nose. Neither pilot knew what the other was doing, and that can't happen in a Boeing airplane.

    • @shi01
      @shi01 18 дней назад +2

      @@RaysDad Just, that this isn't true.
      There were dual input events, yes. But the inputs the pilot in command did, wouldn't have resolved the situation even if Bonin, the guy who pulled on the stick, would had let his stick go to neutral.
      Also, there's always the priority button. Push it, you have exclusive control.
      The issue in the case of AF447 weren't the side sticks. It was the immediate break down of CRM. Why didn't they consult the checklist for unreliable airspeed? Why were they the only crew that manage to crash because of this specific problem. It was known that the pitot tubes on the A330 at the time had this specific weakness and similar incidents happend before, multiple times. Nobody else manage to crash the aircraft because of it. In fact these crews reported that it wasn't a big deal.
      Also you're dead wrong if you think something similar can't happen with the Boeing setup. Just look up the AF011 incident in 2022. 777 with Dual input situation without the other pilot noticing it. And in the a Boeing, you don't even get a warning if this happens, and it happens more often than people would think.

    • @dwaynemcallister7231
      @dwaynemcallister7231 12 дней назад +1

      @@RaysDad Good point!

  • @riaan7836
    @riaan7836 20 дней назад +3

    nice one love it

  • @danielaramburo7648
    @danielaramburo7648 20 дней назад +3

    The 747 is so durable and tough, the US president trust it.

    • @famousyouth
      @famousyouth 8 дней назад +2

      It is made in the USA. They have no choice but to love it.

  • @blackmamba3427
    @blackmamba3427 20 дней назад +1

    Awesome video ❤

  • @RobertGracie
    @RobertGracie 20 дней назад +2

    I was gonna say the 1957 Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

  • @manuo7245
    @manuo7245 12 дней назад +1

    the F-16 was the first non commercial FBW aircraft.

  • @FTStratLP
    @FTStratLP 19 дней назад +2

    Thank you for this great video!
    So, does the side stick in the A320 move back into neutral position, when you leave hold of it? And in the conventional 747 it will stay in a certain position according to pitch trim? How is it in the 747-8?
    For me as only being a flight simmer the lack of real trimming and thus having the controls always centering themselves, if you leave hold of them (except maybe when using a force feedback yoke/stick) is one of the biggest draw backs of flight simming.

    • @ARandom777
      @ARandom777 19 дней назад +3

      Yes the sidestick is spring loaded back into the neutral position. The 747-8 function the same way as a conventional plane in regards to pitch. The FBW is only for the ailerons It's partial FBW, not full FBW, as in for all axis, like the 777 or 787.

    • @FTStratLP
      @FTStratLP 19 дней назад +1

      ​@@ARandom777Thank you! Much appreciated.

    • @JanetGrech
      @JanetGrech 19 дней назад +1

      The big problem with flight sims is, of course, the plane doesn't exist, so is not subject to the exterior atmospheric conditions. The flipside, I guess, is that flying real planes is, broadly speaking, approaching sims in approximating situational awareness and overall control, especially with the phenomenal rise in frame rates on up-to-date graphics devices, enabling ever more realistic through-the-window scenery. The full motion simulator being show-cased is the ultimate in the dedicated flight simmers wishbox. Thanks to Joe and Raja.

    • @FTStratLP
      @FTStratLP 18 дней назад

      ​@@JanetGrech Well said!

  • @eltfell
    @eltfell 20 дней назад

    Quiz: If you take the question word by word, the Boeing B-17 was the first non-commercial vehicle to use the fly-by-wire technology. That's because its autopilot wasn't mechanically connected to the control surfaces. It was electrically connected to the actuators. That autopilot was simple and could only provide a stable flight straight ahead. But fly-by-wire technology was used.
    The first vehicle using a fly-by-wire system to control its movements by pilots was the Avro Vulcan 1952, 12 ahead of the moon lander.

    • @massmike11
      @massmike11 17 дней назад

      In the B-17 the bomb sight could also control the flight controls during the bombing procedure.

  • @mattyplayz5589
    @mattyplayz5589 3 дня назад

    i prefer boings flight controls
    also bcs im bias since i like boeing more

  • @LightMike66
    @LightMike66 20 дней назад +2

    I believe the F-117 Nighthawk was the first full fly-by-wire plane. Its non-commercial :)=. Otherwise nice video👍

    • @GVTSounds
      @GVTSounds 20 дней назад +1

      Can't have been. Concorde was the First fly by wire Passenger jet, and that was built in the 60s, F117 wasn't built until the 80s.

    • @ConstantlyDamaged
      @ConstantlyDamaged 20 дней назад

      @@GVTSounds Concorde was a commercial aircraft.

  • @tomstravels520
    @tomstravels520 20 дней назад +2

    The very newest A320NEO’s only have 4x flight control computers instead of 7

    • @skat0r
      @skat0r 20 дней назад

      A321*, there's no A320 with e-rudder yet.

  • @luissimmons654
    @luissimmons654 20 дней назад +3

    next question why is it that when you are landing you push and pull the yoke and twisting it inn and out then right and left in a constant movement

    • @tomstravels520
      @tomstravels520 20 дней назад +6

      Bigger deflections of the control surfaces are needed at low speed due to less air flowing over the surfaces. In Airbus the computer compensates for this so you only have to make small corrections

    • @MikeDCWeld
      @MikeDCWeld 20 дней назад +1

      They have to make adjustments to maintain their glideslope ant the centerline, especially if they're dealing with crosswinds.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 20 дней назад

      Looking at pilots landing a 737, there seems to be a lot of this. I believe it is down to the lack of FBW, instead being old fashioned cables and pulleys. These mean the flight controls are a lot more sensitive. Try that in a 777 and you’ll snap the wings off.

  • @PlanesAndGames732
    @PlanesAndGames732 14 дней назад +1

    Quiz: Space Shuttle Orbiter Vehicle

  • @kenbrown2808
    @kenbrown2808 20 дней назад +1

    considering pilots of both airliners had to learn in small aircraft, they all have to be pilots, before they get handed the certifications. I think a more accurate expression is that Boeing pilots pilot more actively in normal hand flight than airbus pilots.

  • @ttjtech
    @ttjtech 8 дней назад

    Excellent video! My question is, why doesn’t the Boeing 717 use a flyby wire system, considering it entered into production in the late 1990s? The 777 is somewhat older, no?

    • @ZK-APA
      @ZK-APA 8 дней назад +2

      Because the boeing 717 isn't a true boeing. Its more of a rebranded MD95 (something like how the Airbus A220 is essentially a Bombardier C series aircraft)

    • @ttjtech
      @ttjtech 7 дней назад

      @ thanks so much for answering this. I really appreciate it. I kind of figured it had something to do with that, though I was thinking along the lines of the DC nine, and I had forgotten about the MD 95.

  • @charlespierce3647
    @charlespierce3647 12 дней назад +1

    Yoke just makes sense, unless you think you are playing a video game instead of piloting an airplane.

  • @lufthansaplanespotting
    @lufthansaplanespotting 19 дней назад +2

    joe, get her more on your videos im just saying

  • @4403323
    @4403323 10 дней назад +1

    The captain has to use the left hand which is not the dominant hand for most of the people to fly the aircraft?

    • @ZK-APA
      @ZK-APA 9 дней назад

      Yoke or sidestick, its the same for both (left seat left hand)

  • @selloeliamolekwa530
    @selloeliamolekwa530 20 дней назад +1

    Captain Joe's videos want me to want to abandon my career and take up a pilot training program.

  • @helge000
    @helge000 20 дней назад

    I guess NASA's Digital Fly By Wire F-8 with the fancy 80's font using the modified Apollo Guidance Computer?

  • @bongm6039
    @bongm6039 20 дней назад

    I think the first none commercial aircraft with FBW was the F16 Falcon

  • @frankdibasta2546
    @frankdibasta2546 4 дня назад

    The f16 I do believe is the first non - commercial fbw aircraft.

  • @bartoszskowronski
    @bartoszskowronski 20 дней назад +1

    airbus and his "fly by computer" that is my definition.
    for "fly by wire" flight controls should ALWAYS represent of real position of control surfaces. And if computer decides it's not safe, force movement of yoke/stick is activated, like stick-pusher do, in many modern aircraft.
    that is a way I see that.
    and airbus's "fly by computer" proof safety of that system.

  • @pashabolokhov
    @pashabolokhov 20 дней назад +1

    Is this again the sort of video with a provoking title, but after you watch the whole of it, they'll say: well it's up to you which you like best, every choice is good

  • @-DC-
    @-DC- 20 дней назад +1

    Bus is far more ergonomic and comfortable as a narrow isle Aircraft Cockpit.

  • @vannizaniboni3502
    @vannizaniboni3502 3 дня назад

    Where does Raja come from? For which airline does she work?
    Cpt. Joe, you used to work on A320 for Eurowings. Now you work on B747s, for which company are you working?
    Thank you.
    Vanni

  • @mikelpacker
    @mikelpacker 19 дней назад

    I think the lunar rover was the first fly-by-wire non-commercial vehicle? 🚗 🚀

  • @320FL
    @320FL 20 дней назад +1

    I flew yoke first then transitioned to the side stick. A damn kid can manually fly the airbus no joke..

  • @RRC786
    @RRC786 20 дней назад

    please make video on audio control panel(ACP) and radio management panel(RMP) in airbus aircraft.

  • @Bycopikeynes
    @Bycopikeynes 20 дней назад +2

    👍👏❤️ excelente video 🫶🏻

  • @viperdriver82
    @viperdriver82 15 дней назад +1

    The Lunar lander

  • @APaviationgame814
    @APaviationgame814 20 дней назад +1

    I WANT A SIM LIKE THAT

  • @user-kp1ei7mn3x
    @user-kp1ei7mn3x 20 дней назад +1

    I'm a (Ret) tank commander, I can drive and shoot a tank. ;)

  • @aashay350
    @aashay350 20 дней назад +1

    Ofcourse Airbus... 🙌

  • @TwitMoe
    @TwitMoe 20 дней назад +1

    The space shuttle.

  • @01thomasss
    @01thomasss 19 дней назад +1

    Answer: "The Flying Bedstead" of the NASA moon landing project of the late 1960's.

  • @karolzammit2249
    @karolzammit2249 10 дней назад +1

    F-16 is the answer to the question at the end of video

  • @connorcunningham2647
    @connorcunningham2647 19 дней назад +1

    Is the answer the lunar landing research vehicle?

  • @MySkyranger
    @MySkyranger 12 дней назад +2

    Don’t you just love Boeing’s 1940s style big steering stick on the 737. 777 787. All those cables and wires. So retro. OR JUST OLD FASHIONED JUNK.

  • @DaEarl777
    @DaEarl777 20 дней назад

    AVRO Vulcan was the First Fly by wire plane

  • @gcampagn
    @gcampagn 20 дней назад +2

    Well, I actually have both a Trustmaster Boeing yoke and the Trustmaster Airbus(Scarebus) sidestick for using my MSFS 2020 simulator and I very much prefer flying with the Boeing yoke because it's much more forgiving than with the sidestick if you happen to do a bad abrupt move! I have a disability in my hands which makes me to get tremors so I only use the sidestick for steering when I'm taxiing on the ground. I don't have pedals, yet. I am going to get pedals soon and that will finish my simulator cockpit. I already have the thrust quadrant(the Thrustmaster Airbus(Scarebus) because it's better quality than the Thrustmaster Boing thrust quadrant). My VR headset completes my flying experience beautifully!

  • @pietrophyothetzaw
    @pietrophyothetzaw 20 дней назад

    Can you make a Airbus vs ATR video

  • @carlweisser3991
    @carlweisser3991 20 дней назад +23

    After 30,000 hours flying a multitude of Boeings and Airbus, my choice is Boeing. The reason I chose Boeing is situational awareness. The side stick is great but it isn't mirrored on the non flying pilot side. Even if it were, the movements are so slight, it would be difficult to determine what the flying pilot was doing. In a boeing you have the old faithful yoke. It's easy to see wht the flying pilot is doing and if necessary either help on the controls or at the very least see what he/she is doing. The auto throttles don't move in the Bus. Again, no situational awareness. Seeing the throttles move is in my opinion essential. You can't cross control an Airbus. The side stick controls RATE of turn, not ANGLE of bank. So, in a crosswind, you either time kicking out the crab to land straight or land in a crab. In a Boeing you can actually do a forward slip just like you did when you were learning to fly if you are more than 60 years old you will understand. It works in all Boeings except the 747 because of the outboard engine and the 737 with the curb feeler winlets. The only thing I like about the Airbus is the dinner tray.

    • @rasta77-x7o
      @rasta77-x7o 20 дней назад +4

      I am no pilot, but i see Mentour Pilot has the same complaint often about the input not being felt in the other stick and that could have saved some events.
      However i do appreciate Airbus hard laws or whatever it is called has saved people where the pilots would have caused their demise.

    • @Inquisite1031
      @Inquisite1031 20 дней назад

      @@rasta77-x7o triggering any of the airbus normal law protections is very very rare, and if a pilot does do that he or she has some serious explaining to do

    • @Nemo2507s
      @Nemo2507s 20 дней назад +2

      @@rasta77-x7oUPRT is mandatory on every airplane even airplanes with stall prevention systems like Airbus because someone managed to stall and crashed an A320. Airbus’s prevention mostly only works if you actually know how to deal with it

    • @tonamg53
      @tonamg53 20 дней назад

      @@Inquisite1031At least the pilot get a chance to explain themselves in an Airbus…
      Do the same in Boeing and usually the investigators had to dig through the wreckage to find the explanations…

    • @Scarebus_Driver
      @Scarebus_Driver 20 дней назад +2

      @@tonamg53 heard of Air France 447?

  • @Scarebus_Driver
    @Scarebus_Driver 20 дней назад +3

    10,000 hours Airbus Boeing FBW 3000..Boeing for me im allowed to be treated as a pilot. Similarly the Boeing failure mentality is LIGHTYEARS better than ECAM and the overly regulated failure management Airbus inflict on crews. From a failure management perspective its not even close..

    • @ARandom777
      @ARandom777 19 дней назад +2

      Honestly it's pretty nice to see a pilot who isn't on the Airbus train for once. Today you won't see much pilots preferring Boeing over Airbus. I assume you're a 787 pilot based on the pic, my favorite of the Boeings. A technological marvel of the 2000s.

  • @noeramirez4975
    @noeramirez4975 13 дней назад

    Fly by wire is like fly a DJI Mavic Drone. 😉

  • @RameshWarlall1952-rh5js
    @RameshWarlall1952-rh5js 7 дней назад

    Best and beautiful sir.

  • @luissimmons654
    @luissimmons654 20 дней назад

    please question what are the most common frequencies used in Atlantic region i mean from north america to the south Argentina and the caribean i have in my book 124.1 133.0 133.4 199.6 124.0thoes are fiew that i have do you the others

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 20 дней назад +1

      Crossing that Atlantic, the most common frequencies listened to are 123.4 and 121.5.

  • @theresacaron4238
    @theresacaron4238 17 дней назад +4

    I disagree, in the Airbus the computer is in control limiting the pilots' inputs. In addition, lack of feedback in the joysticks caused an Air France airbus to crash in the Atlantic as the pilot in charge did not realize the co-pilot was holding full aft stick on his side preventing a stall recovery. In a Yoke aircraft, the other pilot can monitor the inputs by observing the movement on the yokes. So, in my book, the computer-controlled aircraft is operated by less skillful pilots who rely on computers to save their bacon. I use a joystick to play games, not to fly an airplane. You should both join the Airbus sales department as this was the obvious goal of your presentation.

  • @thilinajayasinghe7339
    @thilinajayasinghe7339 2 дня назад

    Great"!!!

  • @kevinsavla
    @kevinsavla 20 дней назад +4

    17:29 answer is Avro Canada CF-105

  • @David-yy7lb
    @David-yy7lb 20 дней назад

    Awesome explanation but i don't understand is if a plane loses all hydraulic systems why doesn't the airplane manufacturer us electric actuators for the main flight controls so the pilots can still control the plane to make an emergency landing....prime example flight 232 when the #2 engine fan disk blew apart and ruptured all the hydraulic lines the plane was uncontrollable and crashed landed in Suiox city Iowa

    • @ARandom777
      @ARandom777 20 дней назад +2

      787, A380 and A350 already do this. The 787 has Electro Mechanical Actuators that will power 2 spoilers per wing and the trimmable horizontal stabilizer if all 3 systems fail. The A380 and A350 has Electro Backup Hydraulic Actuators that will power some spoilers, elevators, horizontal stabilizer and rudder if the 2 hydraulic systems fail. They are the only aircraft after the 737 that can survive all hydraulic systems dead provided one engine is running that is...If all engines are dead with no RAT (and electricity in the 787 because the batteries can power the controls with no hydraulics for a limited time only), only then are you doomed on those 3 as well.

    • @Inquisite1031
      @Inquisite1031 20 дней назад +1

      because the chances of that happing is very very slim, and to put on electrical actuators that can move flight controls that big would be a massive undertaking, i always tell this to people who think they have great ideas, if u can come up with an idea, then the people who design that also came up with it, and if its not implemented its because there are hurdles that u are not smart enough to realize.

    • @massmike11
      @massmike11 17 дней назад

      You are not smart enough to realize? Really? How many great invention came from one man with an idea in his garage that nobody else thought would work? Since we are talking aircraft, the whole thing false to two bicycle makers and before that some crazy gut with some ash sticks and canvas.

  • @ybing
    @ybing 11 дней назад

    if I remember correctly there was an accident caused by both pilot try to control the side stick in an emergency ended up unrecoverable

  • @CaptainAliAnderson
    @CaptainAliAnderson 20 дней назад +1

    Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow

  • @Fredcat-6
    @Fredcat-6 20 дней назад

    The description of roll control is wrong. A conventional aircraft does not roll to wings level from a turn when the yoke or stick is let go.

    • @ZK-APA
      @ZK-APA 20 дней назад +2

      Roll is not the right word, but yes because of stability it will return back to wings level eventually.

    • @shi01
      @shi01 19 дней назад

      Depends what you call "conventional". Basically all airliner type aircraft are build with a so called "dihedral wing" which means the wings are slightly canted. This causes asymetrical lift when the aircraft is rolled which causes the aircraft to roll slowly back to a neutral position by itself without additional control inputs.

  • @MrGuzmanra
    @MrGuzmanra 4 дня назад

    The Moon lander was fly by wire, no?

  • @romeoC9968
    @romeoC9968 11 дней назад

    no feedback in the hand control is the other person takes control? seems like a big design flaw....one designer not talking to the other!
    one big issue i see with the side stick is that what if you're in the seat with the stick on the left and you are not left handed? isn't this a safety issue? surely the column in front of you with both hands on the control is safer just like a car you are taught both hand on the wheel...how is an object that needs controlling in 3D space doesn't need as much control? please explain

    • @ZK-APA
      @ZK-APA 11 дней назад +1

      Although the yoke can be held by both hands, in actual flying, you only have one hand on the yoke, and the other on the throttle (one exception is just after V1 during takeoff). Hence irrespective of yoke or side stick, if you sit on left you fly with the left hand and vice versa.
      And yes, no sync between both side sticks is considered as a con. Hence airbus has to implement a proper takeover technique.

  • @grahamgreene779
    @grahamgreene779 14 дней назад

    regarding the sidesticks canceling each other out. Not to be macabre, but it wasn't theoretical on Air France 447 unfortunately. It seems to be the side stick's biggest weakest. It isn't readily apparent what the other pilot is doing or attempting to do vis a vis the directional inputs. Was the dual warning light and audio a thing when Air France 447 happened or was that instituted as a response?? I can't imagine that was a thing in 09, and that both those guys ignored it, but that was such a head scratcher all around, who knows.

    • @rajainthesky
      @rajainthesky 14 дней назад +3

      I don’t remember every detail of the final report off the top of my head, but I think the other aural alerts (stall warning etc) took priority and that’s why the dual input aural alert didn’t sound, at least most of the time. Also, during stressful situations, hearing is one of the first sensory inputs that is being ignored by our brain. That’s why many people don’t hear warnings during high workload situations, even if they’re fairly loud.

  • @Allan-Lauder
    @Allan-Lauder 20 дней назад +2

    I have a 12 year old son who is fascinated by Aeroplanes, we have tried both the 737 and A320 Fixed based sims, not having flown anything before we both thought the A320 was the most natural to fly for a novice. I think it comes down to are you really flying the A320 or just there for the ride, the Boeing needs a lot more pilot input.
    I didn’t know the 777 was fly by wire, I thought all Boeing were traditional mechanical flight control mechanisms.

    • @Hans_R._Wahl
      @Hans_R._Wahl 20 дней назад +2

      The 777 and 787 are fly-by-wire, but in a different way as Airbus.

    • @markusthl
      @markusthl 20 дней назад +3

      Because a novice can tell what is the most "natural" (whatever that's supposed to mean) way an aircraft is supposed to fly....🤦🏼‍♂️ And also, of course they design aircraft controls based on what is easier for people who have no idea about flying! So, very good point from your side

    • @Inquisite1031
      @Inquisite1031 20 дней назад

      u still need to trim the 777 so yeah a novice will still struggle with it

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 20 дней назад +1

      The 777 feels light as a feather because of its FBW, even at MTOW.

  • @Katschero
    @Katschero 20 дней назад

    I think it was the X15