Backing Up And Cracking Up
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- The plaintiff says the defendant backed into his car, so he's suing for damages. The defendant argues he has backup sensors on his vehicle and never even hit the plaintiff's car.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
Case # 32-203
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court 
Развлечения
She let the defendant go through his whole explanation then says, "You know he has you on tape, right?" Lol
I’m crying! 😂😂😂
The "Perry Mason moment"
The best way to do it lol
ironically , the tape proves the defendant DID NOT HIT the other car . the tape only shows the defendant trying to park in a certain way but clearly shows that no contact was made between his vehicle and the other vehicle . i would appeal the decision based on what the tape actually shows .
@@marleonetti7 You are 100% wrong as it is impossible to conclusively say he didn't hit the plaintiff's car based on the video at 16:07 - the defendant's car is blocking the plaintiff's car and there may be contact at this point. This is a civil case which does not require conclusive proof, but rather that it is more likely than not (i.e. 51% likely) the defendant hit the car. There was video evidence that showed the defendant's car possibly touching the other car, the damage on both cars matched consistent with the video and the defendant was unable to provide an explanation that made sense (and once he lied about having pulled in head first that took away his credibility as a witness). You could appeal all you want but it would not make a difference as the appellate court would accept the Judge's findings based on this evidence.
I don't know what was more frustrating, the defendant explaining himself parking, or video of the defendant actually parking.
Absolutely 💯
😂😂
Plantiff is very calm and confident, he let the video speak for itself.
but the video showed that THE CARS DID NOT TOUCH . bad verdict .
@marleonetti7 are the the defendant bc you are under every comment going hard for him 😂
@@spacepanda9037 no , im just a guy on youtube giving my opinion .
@marleonetti7 under every single comment lol you really wanted to give that opinion
That guy is fighting so hard to avoid paying anything !
the video clearly showed that the two vehicles did not touch each other , because the plaintiff's car would have moved a little if it was bumped and the video would have showed that .
The TV show pays the judgement, so why is he trying so hard 😢
@@marleonetti7 Not necessarily. It's a minor scratch and you won't see the shaking on the video from afar.
He is playing stupid like he doesn't understand
Oh, he understands, but he is still stupid. 😂
I think Judge M lost about 40 mins of her life on this defendant. Jeez.
So did we😂😂😂
I think she did it on purpose 😅😂
Absolutely @@mrs.imakeitmybusiness
22 minutes
I was thinking the same thing! Finally I was like come on there is no way there’s not a video camera in this parking lot! 😂
"My heart is crying" 🤣🤣🤣
Moral of the story, don't back that azz up.
THis comment is underrated
😆😆
This comment has me cackling
…..I’d make an addendum to that: don’t back up unless you know how. I always back in, because I’m terrible at pulling in normally.
Unback, antiback, reverse reversal,
And I thought I sucked at reversing into a parking spot 😂
😂😂 I also act confused when I'm stalling for a lie.
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
*My heart is cryin’”,* and you MOUTH was LYIN’! 🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
💀💀💀
🤭🤣🤣🤣
😂
Lmfao 😂
"He doesn't think you hit it from the back!"
- Marilyn Milan
Classic!
Naughty!
😂😂😂
The only reason he ended up parking head-first in the garage was to hide the damage that his car sustained when he hit the Plaintiff's car. Had he never hit the other car he would have continued manuevering until he was able to back it in.
💯💯💯💯💯💯
No damage.
Damage.
No damage.
Damage. 🌼
🤣🤣 Clever!!
Defendant -- "There is no damage to my car. That dent and scratch on my car came like that from the factory. I special ordered it with a dent and scratch already because I didn't want to feel bad being the first person to damage my car."
They call it "gas lighting".
The defendant was so dishonest.
He lied about everything.
Hahaha
😂😂😂
This is why it should be mandatory for folks to retake their Drivers License after a certain age. Everything he did while trying to park was worrisome 😩🤦🏾♀️
As a 70 year old, I couldn't agree. I'm not quite as good as I was 40 years ago but I still got it!
@@kellyrowe398as a 60 yr old I 💯 agree there needs to be mandatory retesting!! My mother is a fucking danger to EVERYONE on the roads!!
😂😂😂@@SuperNoahsmom
The fact that Judge Milian said he was doing a 40 point turn instead of a 4 point turn, told me he was doing ABSOLUTELY too much..😂😂😂😂
OH, I did not know that you were visiting your friend of 70 years. Obviously you could not have hit his car because no one who is visiting their friend of 70 years hits another car. Thanks for providing that very relevant evidence.
This is soooo painful to listen to
EXTREMELY frustrating!
That age not taking accountability. Ridiculous
Defendant is such a freaking liar! I could tell by his angry face as he walked in that he was most likely a liar.
Judge to defendant: You're doing like a 40-Point Turn... what are you doing in this video??!? 🤔🤪🤯😫😖😰😣. 🤣
Liar, Liar pants on fire.
"There is no damage to my car. That is a scratch. Quit trying to confuse me with semantics."
Man, I just love Judge Milian. Her demeanor, her obvious physical attractiveness and her intelligence. I can't watch those remote cases, however.
I only watch those while doing chores or busy work. They're not as interesting, but you can afford to be distracted while watching. Otherwise, you're right! You get the best interactions and reactions when they're in person. And the comments are icing on the cake!😂
@@18missmm Stay frosty or is it stay frosting? Which is it? I sing, you sing , we all sing for icing. Espresso is my friend. lol
@@mikeyh0 😂 I think it's "stay frosty"
They drive me crazy too. So I listen/watch them while i'm driving. Lol
Seriously, watch the hallway interview with Doug at 0.25 speed. 😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Oh wow. Thanks
That was the best suggestion ever. 😂😂😂
It was youuuuuuuuu
@@williammartin5569Best part!🤣🤣
“You’re killing me” I’m sorry I’m so sorry! 😂😭😭😭
Sometimes you don't really feel it when it's a tough but it still does damage to your car
He sounds like Count Dracula! Old liar 😂
44 point turn 💀
Edward “ cut them off” lol
Lwad I caught that too 😂😂😂😂
Omg the defendant is lying thru his teeth !!!
Good judgement
Why do they insist on naming just about every accident case "Back Up Crack Up" 😐😒 Give it a rest, jeez
but you must admit it's not as bad as
harvey's '...he hardly knew her' line
Yeah the hardly knew her is more annoying. But not by much
Backer? I barely knew her
@mmk07135 😂 You've managed to make them worse, right when I thought they couldn't! And it's hilarious!
@msteinberg7 Exactly what I was about to say!😂
Is anyone else confused about why he backed into the space? He pulled in just fine the first time 🤣. Could have avoided this whole mess
Haha I had back up sensors on the Chrysler Pacifica.
They go off too late.
I wouldn't have thought the judge drove a Pacifica lol
Agreed. Thats not a very good quality car. Would have thought she would make better choices in life
@@oldageisdumb My wife and I have owned a 2018 Chrysler Pacifica for 6 years and it's been a great van with very good quality - Judge Milian's "choice" to own one likely has been as positive as ours.
@@Stressless2023 I’m glad you have had a good experience but they are known to be poor quality vehicles. Look at almost any report by experts.
@@oldageisdumb "Experts" are not "owners" - And accusing people of not making good choices by purchasing things that you don't agree with is silly, especially a millionaire TV personality who can afford what she wants - Apparently judge Milian liked her Pacifica as do my wife and I, it has not been unreliable or poor quality. Try not to repeat nonsense that you heard or read without any personal experience.
@@Stressless2023 It’s not something “I don’t agree with” lol It’s stats
Harvey be looking strung out af😂😂😂
He has like 6 jobs like Ryan Seacrest
lololol the defendant knew he did it the entire time and she let him weave his web of lies until he couldn’t anymore but shocking plot twist he still tried!!! this is why when people reach a certain age they should have to retake their drivers test.
Judge gonna pop an aneurysm
I haven't laughed this hard! Listening to him had me ☠️🤣🤣
The defendant is full of CRAP! He's just babbling nonsense! Why did she allow that to continue for so long?!
"You think everyone has to do a 40 point turn!?" And Douglas face 😅😅
what is wrong with the defendant!!! the tape is so clear. admit it already!
The defendant did it😂😂😂😂😂
I’m invested!!! Haha he needs his own show!!!😅😅😅😂😂😂
It would be much easier backing into that spot
😂😂😂😂 the defendant
" You cannot go like this and go like that!" 😂😂
They've used this title over and over and over
Always check for videos nearby whenever a crime occurs.
The tape showed mostly the 2nd lie about parking in one move, immediately nose forward. The lie about the non-existing damage was already pinched. Once a lie means always lies... its that simple... and in court a no go!
He said, " Heart is crying"😂 The way he says he HAS to back in, sounds like he's trying to justify the accident. Accidents happen.....own up, take car of it, n move on
I passed out while RUclips was playing these, and this one woke me up right in the middle, all because this guy couldn't figure out how to park his car 😂
Defendant: "No, yeah, no. I did not do it, but I did"😮.
A "44 point turn"😂---that's go one foot, back up, go another foot, back up, and on and on. He shouldn't be driving, he can't park for sh1t.
Gives new meaning to PULL UP TO THE BUMPER by Grace Jones.
This video should be titled - Back it up, back it in, the legal woes are about to begin!
"So how did it get resolved?"-MM...
UM.... they are in your courtroom....it didn't get resolved
The defendant's attempt to park was atrocious. What was he thinking?
Two of the Chosen in court.
Do you have a problem? When the litigants are POC, do you say two brothas in court? Two amigos in court? Or you're just a bigoted anti-semite.
That van is too big for that old guy. He shouldn’t have a license anymore. He aged out.
This case is intriguing. I found myself in alignment with Judge Marilyn as she adeptly questioned the plaintiff's supposed expertise in assessing damage. Initially, the defendant vehemently denied any involvement in damaging the plaintiff's car, offering responses like 'No damage' when evidence suggested otherwise. It seemed he was attempting to imply that any damage predated the incident. However, his stance shifted when the judge probed further during cross-examination. Despite the defendant's attempts to deflect, the inconsistencies in his testimony became apparent. While the video evidence provided some insight, its brevity made it difficult to ascertain the full extent of the situation. Judge Marilyn's emphasis on the preponderance of evidence, what is most likely, guided her decision-making. As the defendant's testimony unraveled under scrutiny, it became clear that his initial denials were at odds with the facts, ultimately leading to a ruling in favor of the plaintiff.
Why say sorry if you didn’t hit him ? 😂
This dude will keep his license until he's in his 90s and the state wont care.
What a mess of a testimony 🤣
I stopped even listening to defendant
He’s back & forth, hahaha
You have to heart, if you lied. 😊
Good job
Judge Milian drives a Chrysler?!!?
Shocked me too - Chrysler Pacifica's are nice vans but I didn't expect a millionaire TV judge with no small children to drive one 😂
I agree with the judge, never seen someone have that much trouble with a pretty easy parking job.
My heart is crying? 😂😂😂
It appears he is trying to straighten up
Holy hell that was painful to be watch
Why do they always say “the exit is on your left” but they exit to the right?
The defendant talks too much and is saying nothing.
🤣🤣🤣Goor try but you hit him !!!
Painful and my heart is crying 😢
When she asked what makes you a mechanic!? I would have used her excuse " i come from afamily of mechanics"
Oh my goodness the defendant ha
Wait judge MM drives a Pacifica? Somehow I expected a ferrari or something!
Mr. Lewinsky's heart is crying😅
I love the sound of plaintiff's voice; it's pleasing to hear, sexy too.
His poor crying heart 🥲😋
An old liar smh shameful 😂
This case proves that 5,5in is something really big in the right eyes.
The defendant was lying thru his teeth. He was way over animated telling his BS story. Never believed it for a second.
JP never want to pay.
This defendant seems to switch between positive and negative answers to the same question a lot. Is it a language issue with him? For instance, when he said there was "no damage" to his bumper, I think he meant "no NEW damage," but he never re-articulated it that way to the judge and she took his words at face value.
At 1:16-Thank youuuuu Douglas! 😊
Im listening to this case i swear when the plaintiff was announced i heard his last name as "cut him off" 0:02
She's much more fair than Judge Judy.
6:52 Why didn’t the plaintiff call the police? In some states, like Texas you have to report accidents with damages of $200, or more.
nowadays, there's cameras everywhere so if ur someone who tends to stretch the truth, ur better think twice before leaning on ur habitual, quick tongue to get u out of trouble. the truth isnt always convenient but it exudes integrity, which the defendant obviously lacks.
What are we gonna do when people discover that cameras were invented long before they were born, and they have been joined by video.
* blink * * blink * 👀 JM: " *i* drive a Pacifica! they aren't that high." i'm trying to picture JM drivin around miami and hialeah in a frickin minivan💀🤯
omg, this defendant is brain dead. not to mention a big liar.
I think it would have been prudent to have a Russian-speaking interpreter present. The defendant didn't understand.
He understood perfectly he’s just playing dumb.
Also, Judge Judy would have been "concerned" that the video had time jumps. Why not present the full video?!?!?
Time to gang up the keys, gramps.
I just keep fast forwarding the video to avoid listening to the defendant.