@@SuperHalberd they would of been tungsten tipped. And I need to make the correction that it was a 3.7 cm gun. But that 3.7 cm was a modification of the 3.7cm PaK 36, same as the BK 3.7cm guns carried by stukas. Also interesting notes that about 20% of early war t34s and alot of other soviet light armor would of been destroyed by said 3.7cm guns, so I feel it's safe to say that an ostwind with its hvap rounds would of torn through atleast allied light tanks.
Nice! Thanks. I like the way it plays
So Excited to see the Kangaroos. Cant wait to get a few boxes for Rams and Kangaroos for my own British (Canadian) Force.
Can unit do more than one Movement Order (Blitz, etc) per turn in FoW? You can't do it in Team Yankee....
Nice to see some FoW
Great game! The losing side had an absurdly fragile formation! I guess it's realistic but I'd try to build something a bit more resilient.
Nice
Why does an ostwind AA gun have an AT of 7? It has no business shooting at AFVs
its 40mm... they made ap rounds for it. Historically there is reason.
Tell that to my Archers.
@@MrCopenhagen113 Do you happen to have a source or link to point me towards for this? I'm interested in reading about it
@@SuperHalberd they would of been tungsten tipped. And I need to make the correction that it was a 3.7 cm gun. But that 3.7 cm was a modification of the 3.7cm PaK 36, same as the BK 3.7cm guns carried by stukas. Also interesting notes that about 20% of early war t34s and alot of other soviet light armor would of been destroyed by said 3.7cm guns, so I feel it's safe to say that an ostwind with its hvap rounds would of torn through atleast allied light tanks.
@@MrCopenhagen113 That seems reasonable. Thank you for the explaination
Americans correctly pronouncing hornisse challenge: Impossible