Tolkien Refutes Source Criticism

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 дек 2024

Комментарии • 9

  • @roberthill5549
    @roberthill5549 2 года назад +3

    "I know the author specifically said his work was not a allegory to this particular thing, but I shall now make the argument that he was wrong." - Every "Academic" that wants to write a book

  • @gospel2dgeek
    @gospel2dgeek 2 года назад +5

    Can't help but think of the new series Amazon is making based on Tolkien's work. I'm told they're pretty much butchering it by adding contemporary real world issues into fictional Middle Earth. Makes me wonder if I'm doing the same thing to the Bible too.

    • @TheBibleisArt
      @TheBibleisArt  2 года назад +1

      Always something we need to keep in mind. It’s a temptation for all of us.

    • @heartsandmindsathome
      @heartsandmindsathome Год назад

      As a former futurist, now preterist, I can freely admit I did that very thing!

  • @justanother240
    @justanother240 Год назад

    I remember watching a video by InspiringPhilosophy (I think it might have been this one -> ruclips.net/video/xX2O2aACCOw/видео.html), where IIRC, he made the case that the ancients produced and handled written text in a different way, such that it is completely normal to have two slightly contradictory accounts of the same incident side by side.

  • @kpmack0914
    @kpmack0914 2 года назад

    100% agree. The sitz im leben can be vital to understanding a text (one can't read Turgenev's Fathers and Sons without understanding the historical context, for example), but liberal theologians took it way too far.

  • @МаксимГлушков-у6й
    @МаксимГлушков-у6й 2 года назад

    Очень интересно! Спасибо! You are doing great work! Very insightful! Keep it up!