HOW TO WIN ARKHAM HORROR: THE CARD GAME | Understanding Risk
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 сен 2024
- Please click the Like button if you enjoyed this video. It's the best way to help out our channel!
In this episode of How To Win: Travis and Justin talk about taking risks, the different kinds of risks you can take, as well as how to evaluate when and where you should take risks. Hopefully, this video helps you walk away with some more Arkham wins under your belt!
Understanding Tempo: • HOW TO WIN ARKHAM HORR...
SUPPORT US BY
Joining Our Patreon: / playingboardgames
Watching us on Twitch: / playingboardgames
Joining us on our discord: / discord
Buying our merch: merch.streamel...
FOLLOW OUR SOCIAL MEDIA:
Twitter: / boardgametwitch
Luv these videos....wish I could play a campaign with you.. Arkham LCG is by far my favorite board/card game out there. So far you have not done anything on the chaos bag...(maybe I missed it in my glance through the videos) it could be a 'too basic concept' but I thought it helped myself and fellow campaigners to know how to judge the chaos bag. Know when to throw more at a test or when to hold back. The other side of this is to discuss cards/builds that control the treachery deck or chaos bag
ruclips.net/video/_tlM-HN5kH4/видео.html
Might looking for that? 🤔
Since this is a series, a follow up video can be analyzing the risk / benefit of specific lines of play. During your live play throughs, I'm sure there's a lot of evaluation that could be very instructional. Breaking down a decision chunk could be very beneficial to show just how fun and helpful the risk evaluation can be
Really good video! It’s interesting to extend this idea of mitigation versus acceleration to upgrade choices - do I take Death XIII or upgrade deduction, e.g. Do you adjust upgrade strategies based on success or difficulty? I find I upgrade more to mitigate on blind plays, and more to accelerate on repeats where I know the types of pressure I’ll face. Wonder if that differs between the three of you?
This is a great framework that requires a lot of situational data. Early vs late campaign. Early vs late scenario. Deck composition. Team makeup. A follow up with illustrated examples might help.
It also varies depending on the scenario card.
-3. If you fail, place 1 doom on the current agenda: Suddenly it might be less good to be just +2 on your basic investigate action.
Hey which video was it where you were using Harvey and True Understanding with the gugs?
That'll be on an upcoming draft gameplay video. I think next Wednesday, but I could be wrong.
@@PlayingBoardGames Nice thx