I bought the 2.0 gr version.I just love the way it looks.consumption is in the 40s minimum.but the power is way better than the 1.8.the ten year warranty is a bonus
Me too. The 2L is great. It can easily overtake mercs and beemers even I find! And if you're frugal enough, you also get that amazing fuel economy... it's the best of both worlds.... good economy on the one hand and also decent punch when you need it...
It's still loud and plasticy though. I wish they make the sound insulation and overall quality better. That's why I spent a bit more money and bought a Lexus. They are great cars.
@AndyGrouch the money goes to the reliable powertrain and parts. Not amenities like most european cars and cut costs on reliability. Get Lexus if you want luxury taste, but still the same reliability. PVC parts are actually extremely reliable and last decades, unlike leather or rubber.
hello! My friend can I ask something because i have a Toyota corolla of 2020 1.8 hybrid and I bought it last month and it has 3800 milometer mileage then every time I filled with full tank gas then it has just 750 KM mileage to drive that was shown on the dush board. And what do you think the different about your corolla because in full tank on your dush board display can drive up to 1074 KM. Do you think mine is normal has only 750Km full tank because it's new or may be ther is a problem on it?
This is terrible. My old Audi A8 quattro 3.0 Turbo diesel 233 hp diesel consumption on the highway is the same if not lower. 6/ 100 Good job Toyota. Same consumption as V6 and Audi is more than 2000 kilogrammes and it's 11 years old The economy is only in the city I guess
Yeah the difference is that audi is using diesel fuel which is 30% more efficient by design. It all comes down to taxation and politics really which is the most economical way to drive. Also if all the people in cities drove hybrids there would be much less pollution which also counts for something and as you see that toyota does under 4l/100 in the city which is far less even than a diesel car which are pretty economical to begin with.
The same as Auris 2013, at 143 km/h in speedometer (130Km/h actual speed 10%off ) you will get about 6 - 6.5 L/100 Km. The most efficient way for Auris or Newer 2020 Corolla hybrid 1.8 L is by driving at 10m behind truck or bus. I consistently get 3.5L /100 Km at 99Km/h speedometer reading. For newer Toyota, all come with standard adaptive cruise control, it will match the speed of the vehicle in front of you, much easier to do. Without any car in front of you the maximum mpg is at 70Km/h, you will get 3.5 L/100Km.
@xx404notfound dude, I drove behind the bus for more than a decade. It is much safer than driving behind regular cars that can stop much faster. Truck and bus take much longer time to slow down. The danger is not braking reaction, but something fall down from them. Unfortunately, I had more incidents from cars and SUV that drives irresponsible and not well maintained. Radar cruise control matches the speed reliably behind big vehicles better. Just keep the distance safe enough, 100m is just right and the effect on MPG is still huge. 3.5L/100 km vs 4.5.
@VNL 730 Да есть. Максимум 4 км приезжал. Но все зависит от заряда батареи, температуры, климат контроля и скорости. Как-то подготовиться к езде на электро тяге не возможно
@@joker8541 .Zday ee naher obratno...eto mashina ne dla teba...nikakoy ekonomii. 1.4 jret na 100 7 litrov. Kupi polnostyu elektricheskuyu I butet tebe schastye.
Good question! sadly. Now it’s about 0 degrees outside. The distance to my work is 4 km and the average consumption is 7-8 liters / 100km Dobre pytanie! niestety Teraz na zewnątrz jest około 0 stopni. Odległość do mojej pracy wynosi 4 km, a średnie zużycie wynosi 7-8 litrów / 100 km
How did you hit 6-6.5? I’ve never got that high with mine, drove 600 km on the highway, 110-130 km/h = 5.2 L/100 km. 3 persons + one baby and some luggage.
I asked myself the same question. Was the trip uphill and against the wind in both directions? Did he take the air out of the tires and replace it with sand?
![FendiDa Rappa - Clock Dat ft. Shamar Marco [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3NBU8KHdxYY/mqdefault.jpg)
Toyota needs to being these to North America and we can do our own fuel consumption tests.
I bought the 2.0 gr version.I just love the way it looks.consumption is in the 40s minimum.but the power is way better than the 1.8.the ten year warranty is a bonus
Me too. The 2L is great. It can easily overtake mercs and beemers even I find! And if you're frugal enough, you also get that amazing fuel economy... it's the best of both worlds.... good economy on the one hand and also decent punch when you need it...
It's still loud and plasticy though. I wish they make the sound insulation and overall quality better. That's why I spent a bit more money and bought a Lexus. They are great cars.
@AndyGrouch the money goes to the reliable powertrain and parts. Not amenities like most european cars and cut costs on reliability. Get Lexus if you want luxury taste, but still the same reliability. PVC parts are actually extremely reliable and last decades, unlike leather or rubber.
hello! My friend can I ask something because i have a Toyota corolla of 2020 1.8 hybrid and I bought it last month and it has 3800 milometer mileage then every time I filled with full tank gas then it has just 750 KM mileage to drive that was shown on the dush board. And what do you think the different about your corolla because in full tank on your dush board display can drive up to 1074 KM. Do you think mine is normal has only 750Km full tank because it's new or may be ther is a problem on it?
Same for me. When it had 0km on ODO it showed 1023km with 5,1l average consumption. Now it shows 823 at best with 5.4l consumption.
Hi! it goes off of your driving style and how you drive… the more aggressive you tend to drive will lower the range. hope this helps!
@@klyxrasta Right now, after 90.000km, he showed maximum 740km on full tank
@@GaryBullDog same for me on 30000 km. full tank usually 719 or 739 km
Why does stormy weather have such a big impact ? Was it 15°C colder or was there such a strong headwind?
Thanks for a
real test!
Avec un plein, vous avez plus de 1000 kilomètres d’autonomie ?
Spalanie w miescie 4,8 l na 100 km
Spalanie autostrada 130-140 km/h
5,6 litra
This is terrible. My old Audi A8 quattro 3.0 Turbo diesel 233 hp diesel consumption on the highway is the same if not lower. 6/ 100
Good job Toyota. Same consumption as V6 and Audi is more than 2000 kilogrammes and it's 11 years old
The economy is only in the city I guess
ruclips.net/video/D2jsE_11Aow/видео.html
Yeah the difference is that audi is using diesel fuel which is 30% more efficient by design. It all comes down to taxation and politics really which is the most economical way to drive. Also if all the people in cities drove hybrids there would be much less pollution which also counts for something and as you see that toyota does under 4l/100 in the city which is far less even than a diesel car which are pretty economical to begin with.
Thats bad af. Worse then older auris, what is wrong?
Well in Poland i get 4.9 on 120 km/h trip 340 km including 23 km in city.
It's atmospheric gasoline engine. What do you expect? The small battery doesn't have any significant effect on the highway
I have brand new carola 1.8 hybrid fuel consumption 9l/100 mix
how to change the temperature unit in driver settings toyota corolla 2020?
Util, Gracias¡¡¡
Nice video. By the way, what is the consumption at 130 and 140 km/h on highways on longer journeys?
In my country, max speed limit is 110kmh. So, I cant test it.
The same as Auris 2013, at 143 km/h in speedometer (130Km/h actual speed 10%off ) you will get about 6 - 6.5 L/100 Km. The most efficient way for Auris or Newer 2020 Corolla hybrid 1.8 L is by driving at 10m behind truck or bus. I consistently get 3.5L /100 Km at 99Km/h speedometer reading. For newer Toyota, all come with standard adaptive cruise control, it will match the speed of the vehicle in front of you, much easier to do. Without any car in front of you the maximum mpg is at 70Km/h, you will get 3.5 L/100Km.
@@rondhole hope your time reaction is like formula 1 driver when you are driving 10m behind truck on highway
@xx404notfound dude, I drove behind the bus for more than a decade. It is much safer than driving behind regular cars that can stop much faster. Truck and bus take much longer time to slow down. The danger is not braking reaction, but something fall down from them.
Unfortunately, I had more incidents from cars and SUV that drives irresponsible and not well maintained. Radar cruise control matches the speed reliably behind big vehicles better. Just keep the distance safe enough, 100m is just right and the effect on MPG is still huge. 3.5L/100 km vs 4.5.
bad
какой расход стал после 1000 км, в городе и на трассе?
город летом 4.5-5.5. Осенью 5.5. По трассе 4.5-5.5 100-120кмч. Рекорд по ночному городу на дистанции 20км - 2.6 литра/100км
@VNL 730 Да есть. Максимум 4 км приезжал. Но все зависит от заряда батареи, температуры, климат контроля и скорости. Как-то подготовиться к езде на электро тяге не возможно
У меня вапще новая.1.8 hybrid средний расход 9 на 100🤔
@@joker8541 .Zday ee naher obratno...eto mashina ne dla teba...nikakoy ekonomii.
1.4 jret na 100 7 litrov.
Kupi polnostyu elektricheskuyu I butet tebe schastye.
@@joker8541 Если ездить на очень короткие дистанции (до 5км). Конечно, пол пути двигатель будет работать только для прогрева.
A jak wygląda spalanie na bardzo krótkich dystansach? Np. 3-4 km od startu?
Good question! sadly. Now it’s about 0 degrees outside. The distance to my work is 4 km and the average consumption is 7-8 liters / 100km
Dobre pytanie! niestety Teraz na zewnątrz jest około 0 stopni. Odległość do mojej pracy wynosi 4 km, a średnie zużycie wynosi 7-8 litrów / 100 km
@@GaryBullDog A orientujesz jakie będzie to spalanie dla proceed GT?
@@jaypabloPL Nie pojechałem do proceed GT, ale myślę, że zużyje znacznie więcej paliwa (10-12)
Właśnie wróciłem z wycieczki po mieście. 18 km - 4,4 l
@@GaryBullDog 4.4 w corolla 1.8?
@@jaypabloPL yes
How did you hit 6-6.5? I’ve never got that high with mine, drove 600 km on the highway, 110-130 km/h = 5.2 L/100 km. 3 persons + one baby and some luggage.
I asked myself the same question. Was the trip uphill and against the wind in both directions? Did he take the air out of the tires and replace it with sand?
It is first 500km of this car. New engine.
@@GaryBullDog OK
I drive 922 km , 2 person , 2 children & luggage 70-130 km/h = 4.1 l/100km (with 95 oct.)
@@iliasdiamantis7728 i want repeat test. It's was a new car and first 1000km. Now consumption is lower
city aggressive drive only 60 =))))))))) dude aggressive is like 80