EPIC PRO SE LITIGANT fights banking corruption in the Supreme Court and WINS!!! Self Represented!!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
- law.justia.com...
An Epic self represented litigant fights against banking and finance corruption in the Supreme Court and WINS!!!!
#supremecourt
#victory
#winning
#prose
#selfrepresented
#legal
As a lawyer, I must say this is one of the better pro se litigants I have seen. Stuck to common sense and plain English, didn't try to put on an act, but also alerted the Court to certain cases he says are favorable to his cause. It's a good recipe
For people talking about the excessive questions -- this is common and expected, for lawyers and pro se litigants alike. This is an appellate court, not a trial court. Therefore, the focus is (generally speaking) on the _law_ , not the _facts_ . You should expect, when you are before a higher court, to be grilled with questions, because they are really trying to get to the nitty gritty legal implications of the case. They will ask you "What about this case ___ , and what about that case"; they will ask you "But isn't your case different than that case, because of XYZ? And isn't your case more like this case ___ because of ABC?" "What about this statute?" "Why do you think this language ___ means this?" It's not bullying, and it's not because he's a pro se litigant, this is just a function of what appellate courts do. They are inquiring, it's not like the trial court where it is on the parties to present the evidence and the judge just sits there as a referee.
Doesn't mean you will always get a lot of questions. Some cases (or at least the argument) is relatively straightforward and doesn't require it. But lots of questions should usually be expected. You go in there with a big speech prepared and you just end up answering questions the whole time.
I did my best to answer and move back to my wheelhouse 😅
🙏
🙏
I'm guessing all the questions were due to the fact that it can set a precedent on record.
Is that any court of record? Or just certain higher courts or certain jurisdictions?
For example, could a case from a county court(or the "common law" version) be cited in a federal court, or vice versa?
It's a court of record. Fantastic question!
A bank saying they’re being blackmailed is oh, so precious.
The great part is that they weren't even saying that they were being blackmailed, they said it was cybersquatting. They could have sued me for blackmail if they wanted, but it wouldn't have worked either all they wanted was the website. 😅
Please share and subscribe!
best news all week, a normal person wins against the corrupt machine. GOOD ON YOU, WELL DONE. steven
Thanks my friend. And I'm not done. I'm going to help others and right wrongs. Www.SelfLegalAid.com
The argument from the Charter West is "We hurt him, and now he has the audacity to try and hurt us"
😅🤣
These judge are so courteous and attentive to this man's arguments. Great job to the judges! and great job to the pro se litigator!
Thank you!
This is EXACTLY what Americans needed. We are here to rally the troops!
Thank you! By joining me, you are ensuring everyone gets treated properly!
I read the findings of the court, and you could hear in the judges questioning of the bank's lawyer they were leaning in this direction from the start. This guy should have been a lawyer with how he was able to find the gap in the defense the bank left.
I would love if you shared and subscribed. I may not be a lawyer, but I am trying to protect the little people from the system. Stay tuned❤
Sounds like the bully bank picked the wrong victim and got a nose bleed 😂
Broken 😅
The end result of the decision is that Charter West lost their claim that this m an was cybersquatting. Another example of a corporation refusing to do the right thing and then
going to the mat to crush the little guy.
Exactly
Holly shit Government is worthless. Charter West, CFPB, Department of Banking and Finance, the Fed Reserve, AttourneyGeneral, the Ombudsma, Lower Courts, and Appeals Court.
The Government is not worthless. Mr. Riddle is the government. The government's representative may be worthless. but Mr. Riddle proved his worth. The people are the government. It is the people's job to hold their representatives accountable.
What's even worse, they did it again.
That statement was last year, but they screwed me again this year. I just posted it
@@ThePro-Se oh gosh. They are nuts
Plantars
Hashtag facts
Why did this court basically highjack the guys time with explanations to the audience? It's like they wanted to prevent him from delving too deeply before them into the unfair tactics of the corporation. PS I would suggest never have anything to do with Charter West. From the lawyers arguments, you know it is a rip off company with low morale values and a conman's ethics.
Technically, I tried to put everything in there that was unrelated, and it would have been stopped by the Court if I was an attorney. 😅😅😅
I wanted to make sure the whole story got told, win lose or draw.
That way everyone could see what actually happened, not just that I bought www.charterwestbank.com 😅
When the courts travel to law schools for cases, it is common for them to do this so the law students can fully grasp what is going on.
If you notice the lights beside the speaker’s podium, the time limit expired on both litigants but the court kept going.
While this is a fully legal proceeding, it’s for the benefit of the students so there’s not nearly as stringent of timeframes.
True
Rogue nation just shared this. I wish more would've came to the OP. GREAT JOB winning your pro se fight!
I'm grateful for any shares. Thank you so much for looking out!
Great job, Mr Riddle!
They tried to blackball you. You caught them. You give it back, and boy, did they underestimate you!
Sometimes the truth will come out, as long as you push hard enough to force it!
Thank you for the kind words!
IMHO...CharterWest just destroyed themselves... i wouldnt even consider doing business with this financial institution... 😂 bravo plaintiff...🎉🎉🎉
That was the goal. They screwed us, but I don't want others to experience the same.
Im an old Nebraska boy... my ancestors planted their roots in West Point... im from the western panhandle, UNL grad. Live elsewhere now but i most definitely understand the small town rural farming agribusiness banking atmosphere edemic to these communities...even Sarpy County with the big city goings on see things much the same...Folks looking to borrow ...farm loans, home loans... car loans ...business loans... will easily recognize the harm to their reputation this entity did to themselves... So why not just fix the glitch when it was small and containable? ...and compensate your damages?... easy and no one knows... no one cares...duh... Now its embarassing to see it broadcast through the heavans for eternity... a major pr failure on their part. Imho.🫡
So you definitely know who CharterWest is😂😅
Good for you! More of us need to stand up to the banks for whatever crime they are committing. We should all learn the law.
At a minimum, the people slated to uphold the law, should protect our interests.
My videos prove they are actively engaging in the unethical and illegal behavior.
@@ThePro-Se they have robbed the people blind. While double dipping at every turn.
And the worst part, the government officials are complicit. That's why I lost until the Supreme Court.
@@ThePro-Se most of them believe we work for them and are under them, I agree with that. They need reminding that we stand over them. But we have to learn. Most people don’t even know what the constitution says…
I know the law little bit gathered most of the evidence but need motion to compel with FOILs alot of evidence was covered up already and retired people to cover there tracks very unique case worth justice!
The judges definitely could have eased up a bit in their questioning of the litigant, but regardless, good job. Also for the bank's attorney: coming to court with no documentation of losses or potential loss when that's a required element? Like.. nothing? Jesus, bring in a media or PR expert to testify as the impact to typical businesses, build a foundation. Also, relying on a customer being confused when it literally says it isn't their site...
Whether or not anyone agrees with the law or judges on this, the bank's attorney clearly didn't take this seriously and showed up having done little to no legwork and not having the bank's arguments worked out. Maybe they should be hiring the pro se litigant.
It was a LOT of work 😂😂😂
Now I know why they charge so much, but underestimating me was a mistake.
Check out alphonse faggiolo. Can charge the cpurts for going pro se, sincr youre not a lawyer, it takes much more tine and rrsearch for us as pro se to be prepared. Hes figured it out. Get paid Mr! Lol
He didn't need any documents since it's not his appeal, all the evidence are in the record as adjudicated. They are certified and axiomatic principals to the case now since judges already ruled on the cases already, he didn't have to bring new evidence. He is extrapolating damages as his conjectures based on what was said.
Qqqqqqqeee🎉😢 thef
Ty
This is akin to the the pro se buying the building the bank was in because it was for sale and they didnt own the lease. He then says if you want it you can buy it but Im putting signs outside saying this business is bad on my property. Then the bank lawyer argues they are already there he cant buy the property. If anything the bank is squatting on his website name. They should change their name so not to infringe on his web property
I love your way of thinking.
It's funny too, because they were dumb enough not to have any registered mark.
@ThePro-Se thats business 101 too
I think a better analogh for me is you bought property and they think they are entitled to that property cause it looks the same.
If you want it. Buy it. Otherwise why not accuse godaddy of digital squating. They're selling the domain too.
Touche'😅🤔
This is amazing. Whats BS is that it even had to go to the Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Whats wrong with the lower court judges?
They are biased and liars. I can say that with certainty because I've dealt with them many times now.
In my opinion all US courts are exponentially biased and there to help corporations (Including US Government) extort moneys out of The public not to enforce any laws; as they will us precedent (even is faulty) to adapt their only and original mission.
Wait until you see what I post this week. It's exactly that. With game changing evidence
Woohoooo!!!! He makes up pro se litigants look GREAT 👍🏾
Thank you! If you need free advice visit www.SelfLegalAid.com
1st, congrats, well done!!! Much respect for your persistence and hard work. 2nd) People complaining about not knowing the outcome should do a little homework (as others here have) and you can read the Supreme Court's decision. It took 5 min to find and 2 min to read the summarization and another 2 to skim the decision as written by the court. This video isn't a TV show.
♥️
It’s amazing how gracious and understanding the justices were to the Pro Se. (Not being facetious). They were very cool.
I totally agree. I think people are a little annoyed that they stopped me a few times, but realistically, it was a good thing, because I knew they were engaged.
Every judge and justice of the lower court, and 8th circuit, didn't ask anything because they already had their backroom meeting and decided I was the loser.
That being said, I made sure to get everything in that I needed to. 😅
@@ThePro-SeYou did a great job!!! I
Thank you! Please subscribe and share
Most courts will be, as long as the pro se litigant shows sincere actions towards learning what they need to do to represent themselves, and in a professional manner, as a licensed attorney would.
The lower courts definitely didn't follow the law. They are threatened by a savvy Pro se
Bravo! …for creating the website and having the conviction to fight it out in court. It strengthens my resolve to keep fighting, knowing that there are others (you) still willing to Fight the good Fight.
Owner@charterwestbanksucks.com if you have questions not addressed on the website
@ProSe is a badass. Proud of you Sir. Thx for this. ✌🏻
Thanks for the kind words! It's for us all.
The handle @ThePro-Se.
👊👊
wonderful.
Many thanks!
Look up the pruchase and the trademark registration of the town of Wenatchee Wa, back in the early 90s. A gental man noticed that the town had not secured the name throug legal terms, then he did it. Forcing the town to eithre change their name and remove the current name from all letter head and sings , as well every other thing like websites email ect.... or pur hace the trademark registration from him. He won the lawsuit and the town wound up having to buy it from him. Gives a whole new meaning to heads up ball.
Ouch!
The bank’s lawyer complaining that the guy was trying to damage the bank is rich. OK. Of course he does. And justifiably so. Your client damaged the couple and continued to do so until the couple spent how much time and money to force the bank to clear up their error? If they don’t like bad publicity, don’t do bad things.
Thank you. Wait until you see what's coming!
@@ThePro-Se That's what I was thinking... Especially since they never cleared up their lie/negligence/slander. btw, shout out to Brandon-Joe Williams aka ONESTUPIDFUCK for Sharing. Good Job my friend #ItTakesALLofUS
Thanks for sharing!!!
So... a BANK isn't smart enough to own its own name on the internet? That's stupid. I don't know if I could trust a bank that stupid with my money.
It was a big oversight on their part. One I didn't miss😏😅
Somebody tell the bank lawyer that this is not communist China…we can sell what we own whether it’s a car or a website…
He was grasping for straws
The WIN in it’s self is worth a subscription.
❤️
@@ThePro-Se it’s the truth and the least we can do.
If you can share to help get me to 500,i think visibility goes up👊👊
Little guy wins one.!! 🙌🏼🇺🇸
And now, I'm fighting for all the little guys! Please subscribe and share!
Excellent case, I have been in this arena for more than 40 years, this was by far the best Attorney in Fact argued case that I have witnessed. This Man sets the bar for the New Common Law Court of America....but in no way new at all. The law is in us all. My friends if you aspire to discover greatness in laws and Freedom, and know how to express yourself in a manner that gets results, this is the man by which to set your gage.
Thank you for the kind words!
@@ThePro-Se My Friend in this case, the privilege is all mine. Justin the Conqueror. We finally have a Man that has shattered the glass ceiling of " Justice " I know beyond the shadow of a doubt that if your story was produced into a movie, book, or documentary that it would go viral. What we don't see is seven years of swimming in the swamp. When we examine the #1 problem in the World today, it is Justice. Justice is what enables great corruption. What you accomplished is monumental congratulations Justin you slew the Dragon.
Now, for the real game changer.
It makes this victory look like I was the least qualified Pro se in the world.
www.charterwestbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Final-response-to-the-8th-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals.pdf
This one is a lot to unpack, but I included video evidence for everything.
I wouldn't hate if you forwarded it to an attorney
We all need to learn and apply the law if we did the country would turn around overnight
I 100% agree, And I'm trying to build a team of Warriors right now that can peacefully help everybody understand
The game is designed to make it almost impossible for one person to know enough of the law to protect themselves from all the laws on the books…
@@parithon2397 more importantly, the court doesn't follow the basic rules themselves.
They actively make it more difficult on self represented litigants.
“I checked with renowned world authority, Professor Suggon Deeznutz, and he said parody is legal in America,” Musk wrote
Absolutely he did. If I had enough time, I was going to quote him, but I decided to go with the nissan.com part instead., honestly if the judges hadn't asked me any questions I 100% would have made sure to get professors words in there
Many people have bought and sold popular domain names. A lot of companies were slow to lock down their internet presence...
But that would be cybersquatting 😅 I have a gripe website
That was impressive. It's a shame this hearing only covers the site. They need to pay for all the other things they did that led to this.
I refuse to sell them the site. I still own it😏
This guy is a genius by getting their domain name and it just goes to show that the little fish can take down the big fish in a fair and democratic hearing. Now as for the bank give him the million dollars and go away back into the hole you came from.
The funny thing is, and I indicated this in the argument, they did offer me a lot of money for the website.
I just felt like on principal they needed to feel the pain, and so a million dollars is what I desired.
I still own it, because they haven't conceded to that demand, and at this point, they're just willing to risk it. That's why I set up selflegalaid.com
It's on the backbone of charterwest Bank
@@ThePro-Se Please share with us the name, title, and business address of the right person to send letters on your behalf! I am HAPPY to write a letter stating that until you are made whole, I will not use their bank. I will also share this case with all my friends and family in Southern Florida to highlight their business practices. 😊
Subscribe to my channel. You do not want to miss what's coming this week. Then you will know who to contact 😏
That is A Supreme Court, it is not THE Supreme Court. If it is a supreme court, it's at the state level. Cameras are not allowed in SCOTUS. Why? Because SCOTUS is corrupt. SCOTUS has ruled that you can film in ANY area where the public is allowed to be. However, despite that the public is allowed to watch SCOTUS trials, filming is not allowed there. Seems kinda strange that in the very 1st amendment of the Constitution, it clearly states that we are allowed to have freedom of the press and yet SCOTUS restricts filming in their public forum.
Nebraska.
Seems like returning fire instead of retaliation, as the bank mad the first move.
Bingo
I feel like they should've addressed the legitimacy of the emails as admissible evidence much sooner. This was a very interesting listen though. Thank you
That lawyer is not very smart.
No. He's really not 😅😅😅 please share and subscribe ❤️🙏
The overly weak opposing counsel makes the pro se look even better.
If only he had slowed down a bit with his reading of the argument.
I don't think it would have helped if they had Dershowiczs 😅
To claim for damages, then effectively say “well the might be damage we aren’t aware of” when asked if it’s prospective damage or if it’s already occurred, was hilarious.
Maybe I should sue a load of people for things that might have happened to me but I just don’t know about it.
@@Heathen.Deity. 🤣🤠 now you’re thinking!
@@jpilot64 😂
Maybe he was a fortune teller 😂😂😂
How do you get damaged and not know?!? 😂🤡
😅🤣
Your reputation is damaged meaning they would notice a slow down or no business. I would never go to them for a loan.
@@tomjackson4374 the best thing about this is, even though it took 7 years for people to truly know what happened, their business is now now being affected by this❤
The crazy part is they had every opportunity to fix it, but they didn't because they knew it was a sham in the first place that they did to harm us.
@@tomjackson4374 But, they can cite no actual damage now. The publicizing of this case---due to Charter West refuses to make this man whole will, ironically, harm
them more than a website would.
It only took me 7 years to get traction 🤣🤣😅 it was worth the wait.
Mr. Silver looks and talks so much like actor Richard Schiff from the West Wing it's uncanny. Interesting case for sure.
Specifically, this the Nebraska Supreme Court holding a court session at the University of Nebraska Law School. This looks pretty clue.
It was at Creighton Law School.
I kind of felt like I got lucky in the sense that had it been in Lincoln at the Capitol, there probably would have been 5 people in the gallery, and all attorneys 😅
What does "this is pretty clue" mean in this context...? Ive never heard this term or phrase to describe a court hearing
It means "baller"
How do you learn law like this?? I want to learn how to represent myself pro se
If you aren't the defendant, it just takes a lot of time and patience.
If you are the defendant, I'd strongly suggest an attorney, in particular if it's criminal.
I set up good streamline on my website www.charterwestbank.com. Check it out.
@@ThePro-Se thanks for replying!
Thanks for asking!
@@ThePro-Se Per CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM: CIS I Introduction section 2 Definitions: Clients are also called
"wards of the court" in regard to their relationship their with attorneys. CIS Vol. 7 Sections 2, 3, & 4 where it says: 4 ATTORNEY & CLIENT
"..attorney with an obligation to the courts and to the public no less significant than his obligation to his clients. Thus, an attorney occupies a dual position which imposes dual obligations." "His first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter."
@@ThePro-Se I would absolutely never have a Burkhart attorney represent me. They serve the courts. You should know what the word represent means. And you should understand what goes behind that. Don’t ever tell somebody to get an attorney. Everybody here reading this, when you hire an attorney, you are telling the court that you’re too much of a moron to present yourself. I would never have an attorney represent me, but I would certainly hire an attorney in fact to coach me on what to say. Burkhart attorneys are about as useful as the Gum on the bottom of my shoe. .
TBF here, there's no decision in the video. I had to look it up to see what they won.
From what I can tell from this case and the history spawning it, I'm glad they won this one.
well just go ahead and tell us
Www.charterwestbank.com
@@EricAnderson58I won😁 www.charterwestbank.com and then added www.SelfLegalAid.com
excellent!@@ThePro-Se
@ThePro-Se,
Amazing! Thank you! My heroes! Going to Probate, ProSe, and I appreciate the extra links on your site.
I am so proud to have seen this. You two are stars.
Please share this.
Awesome!! Ty
Did I miss something, where was the decision?
My bad. I just added it.
law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2023/s-22-557.html
Legend. 😎
🙏
sounds like the bank f'd around and found out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They are the first of many 😅
WOW 👍🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Thank you!
@@ThePro-Se yeah man I’ve been doing a lot of pro se cases my self and it’s been very difficult but I’m sticking to it. If you have any pointers I’ll take them you went through the whole appeal process I’m like wow. Way to fight I current have a cases in appeal court , fedral district court and our local court of common pleas of Philadelphia county and now 2 cases on appeals at the state level Smh 🙏🏽🤦🏽♂️. Google James Glover and or Shakur Capital it should come up
Email me at owner@charterwestbanksucks.com
We can chat
@@ThePro-Se will do
👍
Great job! Thats not an easy thing to do.
Thank you! These Justices were collectively fantastic!
A breath of fresh air in a typically rigged system.
So what was the decision???
Glad you won, I'm in a pro se case myself in a few different cases.
I set up a great website at www.charterwestbank.com to help. You can also email me at owner@charterwestbanksucks.com if you want any general advice.
Supreme Court …of Nebraska
Exactly. Also known as the highest court a self represented litigant can currently speak in.
If you are from a state where the appeals court is above the Supreme Court, this is different. The only party in the world that can overturn that ruling is SCOTUS.
I wish states were mandated to use the word Superior for their highest courts and not allowed to use Supreme.
Yeah, it can be confusing.
Maybe if all us little guys write a letter to that bank & said we see how slimy you are, we won’t ever use your bank & we will tell family & friends not to either, unless you pay this man his million, & promise to reform your evil ways…& start doing good not evil…
Maybe you can help us out in the future?
The people NEED to know that all lawyers are liars & corrupt, including the courts & every judge?
Think about a traffic offense, where is the injured party? U can’t cross examine or call them, because they don’t exist
If the masses only knew. What really goes on in courts across the country they would hunt these demons & tar & feather them
Look @ most court rooms two doors, near the judge, one door the judge enters in & 1 door the lawyers enter in…guess what.. both doors lead to the same room, it’s an illusion that those waiting to be found guilt actually have a shot @ winning…u don’t
It’s already been decided in THAT back room
When the judge walks in…never rise.. if u do it called raising the dead, because that’s what the court considers u…dead @ sea
Your under an Unconditional system called admiralty law, with the flag with a gold fringe
Stay out of their courts
Cry out to Christ that he will soon send these clowns to the lake of fire… for their lies & planting of evidence against innocent people
Wait until you see what's coming this week.
It's the end of the hidden game they play.
Never done in history what I am doing this week.
It's called a complete, total, 💯 checkmate of the entire US legal system from the clerks all the way to the circuit courts of Appeals.
The game will never be the same. Mark my words.
@@ThePro-Seliked and subscribed for your reply to, and the comment above.
Thanks for the support! Together we will make them notice!
@ThePro-Se ohhh really, that's quite a claim...imma have to check this out ngl
Tell me what you think!
Woooooowwwwww
Bravo Mr pro se....who is the lawyer here. He was awful and looked like the pro se....this guy is speculating damages and all grip sites are damaging.
Keep in mind, I had the facts and law on my side. He never expected to have to make a good argument, because the lower courts never required anything more than a war body opposite me, to rule in their favor.
He simply had no legitimate argument.
Did they finally end up fixing the fake child support thing so you can finally get a mortgage somewhere else? I hope so! Can't believe they did you this dirty. Really enjoyed watching this!
Nope, that being said, I was able to get the house 12 months after they did it. 5 years it took me to finally win in the Nebraska Supreme Court without an attorney.
@@ThePro-Se That's super messed up of them! It's awesome you were able to hold your ground, especially as a pro se! Hats off!
@@HidInMistProductions Thank you! It was a long time in the making.
@@ThePro-Se Have you considered a suit against them for slander and libel?
That's long and gone. This happened back in 2017. It took me until 2023 to get to the Supreme court, and that was because they sued me for the website. Years ago the judge re dismissed all the real causes of action by pretending that none of it mattered.
This was amazing! Do you offer advice?
You can email me at owner@charterwestbanksucks.com or check out the site I set up www.SelfLegalAid.com . I don't offer legal advice, but I I can give you a road map and my input.
Amazing!!! Im sharing your video with my common law group, we sre figuring out how to fix the system. Its a lot of work and im still in learning mode.
www.charterwestbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Final-response-to-the-8th-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals.pdf
Fixed it for you 😘
Update - he won the appeal 😮
Indeed I did!
Unanimously!
Awesome❤
@@ThePro-SeYou're lucky to have these judges. They do not seem to have any prejudice against you as a person or as a pro-se litigant. Lucky You!
@@JawedMemon I made sure that if they did, they would be forced to address it in the opinion, if they didn't agree with my argument.
@@ThePro-Se Congratulations! You did an awesome job of arguing your case. I cannot imagine what you went through for the 7 years (I think you stated 7 years at the end of your argument, apologies if I don’t have that correct) you dealt with this crooked bank, its shyster lawyer/s, and the biased, corrupt courts. It isn’t everyday that a pro se wins or even litigates their case to such a high level so WOW, I am thrilled for your win! I would love to hear more about your case and experience in litigating as well.
Wait, what was the outcome? Fantastic job by the way!
Check out my website www.charterwestbank.com 😏
@@ThePro-Se There's nothing on the website.
Why are you keeping the verdict secret, what are you hiding?
By virtue of the fact that it is my website, I believe we can determine the winner 😅.
Www.SelfLegalAid.com as well.
You can also find the Nebraska Supreme Court opinion on your favorite search engine.
@@ThePro-Se So, you're still hiding the actual verdict.
@@ThePro-Se thanks, as the original person who asked, just letting you know I found it the same day you responded to me with no problem 🤷♀️ because you know, I have eyes.
Best learning video I’ve heard
Thanks for the kind words!
Oh that was heartwarming :)
That female judge with the glasses is very smart and fair.
Great job going pro se.
Can you tell me if pro se is possible in all courts? Or is it just courts of record? Or maybe just state courts and not possible in federal?
I'm from Ireland by the way, and curious about my own law system and philosophy of law, as a means to escape debt slavery in general. Though i must use American cases to learn the law, as information here is difficult to acquire and youtube suits my dyslexia and ADHD much better.
A bit of an aside here, about jurisdictions.
As soon as i saw the row of judges at the beginning, i looked for the flag. I saw immediately it did not have a gold fringe.
This confirms for me that it is a real common law court of record, and not an admiralty jurisdiction.
That's very interesting indeed. i wasn't sure if there were any courts of law left.
You may note how the chief justice(i think that was his title) later in the video makes that very distinction when you mentioned a federal policy, in a court of law.
i believe he was smiling, because federal policy might not have any standing in a court of law, aside from things like contract breach and such.
In the united states, you're definitely allowed to represent yourself in any Court. I honestly couldn't tell you about ireland, LOL
As a retired lawyer I have had to fight for several ppl for attempting that argument and thinking....it is patriot mythology and will get u in jail ...if u do some of the other tactics in this line of thinking...same.
I am not talking about the legiti.acy one way or another about the argument...I am talking about the result.
I'm in a unique position where everything was so egregious and obvious, nothing I do or say that isn't a threat of violence, will be met with anything but acceptance.
If anyone I go after tries to sue me back, they are giving me the discovery they so desperately want to avoid. 😅
@@ThePro-Se Discovery is a term I'm only barely familiar with.
Discovery is the right or privilege to know who is after you and you get all their information that might pertain to that case?
There is a word of phrase I've heard also about "cause" or "cause of action". Maybe discovery is related to that?
To know the nature of the cause and everything related?
Thinks about it like this.
Say for example, you believe you were fired for emails that were sent in the office, but you can't see them because you don't have the authority. If you manage to get to discovery, you will find out if those emails exist.
Or if other things exist. Follow?
Wow.
6:49 the way the judge says “distinctive”. 🙄
The Judges were pretty cool. It was a big difference from what I usually deal with.
@@ThePro-Se i’va actually watched this a few months ago (i forget where) and was so happy to see you win.! I even went to the website, lol. I watch/listen alot of appeals cases, usually federal and you did an AMAZING JOB.!! If you didn’t say that you were “Pro-Se” no one would’ve ever known.! I sincerely hope you continue to get justice.! 🙌🏼🇺🇸
Please subscribe and share. When you see what I am doing now, you will have something to sink your teeth into ❤️🙏👊👊
@@ThePro-SeBrandon Joe Williams is doing some good stuff as well.
I'm always looking for allies. I figure if all of us can unite in a common goal, the system doesn't have a chance.
Notice the Company has to have two to fight the case. They will do anything to keep the citizen down. Funny how many laws there is to look after business but very few for the most important. The Citizen.
www.charterwestbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Final-response-to-the-8th-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals.pdf
This one is a lot to unpack, but I included video evidence for everything.
I wouldn't hate if you forwarded it to an attorney
Post links to the official ruling if you would please.
Just type CharterWest vs Riddle Nebraska Supreme Court.
What was not said to the lawyer was that the bank is a legal entity or a business, and related threats such as "I will annihilate you" are also a threat towards them. But all threats against a legal entity suggest preparation for terrorist action .
In context where I already started legal action and a gripe website, it's not difficult to understand what annihilation means.
They didn't bother making that argument because it wasn't accurate and most importantly, wouldn't have netted them my website.
@@ThePro-Se I woulda at least teied it,if i even knew it was unsuccessful,just to show off the knowledge,and in a case,as a lawyer,you need to do everything permitted by law that is on the table.
And if they see that as an ecomonim lawyer,i know this rule,they might get sympathetic, and i woulda stated that the annihalating weren't staring that is not a physical annihilation,so in that case it would be considered
At the end of the day, they chose cybersquatting in an effort to get my website.
I had a plan and nothing ylthey were going to say would get me off track.
@@ThePro-Se No different than you staking a claim on a gold-mine prior to them being able to do so. They're mad at themselves because they didn't think to register the domain name themselves and you had acquired a piece of intellectual property they left laying on the ground.
Exactly, the only difference in this case is that they literally knew the gold was there, they just never thought anybody else would Wander over to that side of the mountain🤣🤣🤣
Congrats on the win. I am curious to know the amount of the child support judgement.
Did you attempt to dispute it with the 3 credit agencies?
It wasn't on my credit, I had full custody. It was merely something the bank did out of spite.
It never affected my credit because it wasn't real, if that makes any sense.
I want my 27 mins. Back!!!! Or a verdict or finding!!!!
It's a thing of beauty... law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2023/s-22-557.html
The title of this one wasn’t a spoiler yet you felt so confident in those reading comprehension skills to come complain 😅 Welcome to the nature of the U.S. legal system! 🥂 Hope you never have to wait for the legal system as it hardly leaves one with such short attention, thoroughly satisfied. Perhaps you fail to understand when a Pro se litigant wins, every citizen wins? Next time try self stimulation and you will probably still find time for 26.5 mins?
😅
His website is still up. 😂😅😂😅
😂😂😂
I declined to sell and just set up a self help website for pro se litigants.
When you represent yourself, you are practicing law. Those admitted to the various state bars are instructed to eliminate the practice of law by non bar members. There is legal scaffolding supporting this right in your state statues and law. Find your individual State Bar Acts, and there you will see!
They definitely don't want Pro Se Litigants clogging the system, but sometimes the case is just obvious.
Its considered an unlicensed layman which the supreme court has upheld. Theyve also ruled numerous times that we have the right to go pro se and partake in the courts and that any state cannot require soneone to be a part of a third party to do this (the Bar association is a requirement in most states), it keeps people from partaking in their governments. Unconstitutional. I have a whole book " the commom law handbook" i suggest everyone get!!
I gotta disagree as a member of the Massachusetts bar, dawg... We are not "instructed" to eliminate pro se litigants... There are very good reasons though why we have attorneys, rather than pro se litigants generally .... So here, right off the bat I want to say this is a pretty good pro se litigant... _in this specific case_ .... assign this guy in some other case and he would be lost in the weeds with the most basic legal concepts. Attorneys don't just work 1 case. We take all sorts of cases. Even within a specific discipline of law, there are all sorts of cases you will take.
We don't spend three years of law school and then take a very difficult examination just for the fun of it... Just the jargon alone takes a couple years, or at least a year, to learn -- I can't tell you how many times I have heard laymen and "SovCits" say "There's no consideration!, There must be consideration!" and they are thinking "consideration" means what it means in the ordinary English language, as in a "pondering," when in fact in legal terms it means the object of a "quid pro quo." E.g., when you spend a dollar on a pack of gum at the store, your dollar is _consideration_ for that gum. "The law uses ordinary words in extraordinary ways," -- my appellate practice professor.
And that's just the jargon... Many Americans do not _fully_ understand our basic structure of government -- the distinction between the state and federal courts, when one case is brought in one versus another... can one be brought in both? only one? neither? What is "standing" and "mootness"? These are week 1 concepts too; It gets a hell of a lot more complex. Many don't understand what "the law" even is... Statutes, rules and regs, precedent, and constitutions... And how all these things interact with one another, which ones are binding and which aren’t ... what "binding" even means....
And court rules ... these dictate our day-to-day practice as litigators... and the public does not understand these (or even know about them at all). Things like Mass.R.Crim.P. 30 ... Mass. R. Crim. P. 30 is not a "law" in the technical sense, but rather a rule of court that all Massachusetts attorneys must abide by when seeking a new trial for their criminal defendant client, and it has a broad range of implications, from whether a criminal defendant can seek _more_ "discovery" from the state than was offered at trial (aka "post-conviction discovery") to whether they can seek funds to hire an expert to test certain items presented as evidence at trial... e.g. a post-conviction motion for discovery followed by a M.G.L. c. 278 motion for post-conviction forensic testing... And if that testing results in something good, then what? What do you actually do, in practice? Do you go to the appeals court? The trial court? Do you write a letter somewhere? or something else? Lawyers know the answers to all of these, and these are simple.
And there is so much I am leaving out. To be a licensed attorney, you are expected to have a solid grasp of countless legal doctrines, for example (using criminal because this is my area) -- ineffective assistance of counsel, reasonable suspicion vs. probable cause and the expectation of privacy in the context of the exclusionary rule/motions to suppress, Miranda and all its implications, etc.
@@Accuratetranslationservices the fact youre a member of the bar, i dont trust a word you say. And i dont need to read your novel to know the bar association is part of the reason our courts dont operate according to the constitution.... tons of info on this and how terrible they have been for the constitutional republic in which we live. Im sure you just signed the papers and pay the fees without really knowing at all what the Bar association does and has been doing to change the rule of law in america. Do some research. Supreme courts have ruled that its unconstitutional for anyone state or otherwise to require soneone to be a member of some association or any third party to practice law. Youre a lawyer, look it up.... shoukd read the things theyve said about if they cant change the constitutiin theyll do it article by article. Look around dude.... cant say whatever anymore bc it could be miscontrued as hate speech if someones offended.... cant carry a firearm if this that and the third (SHALL NO BE INFIRDGED DOESNT IMPLY LIMITATIONS) the list goes on. Thats who u work for to "practice law" theyve destroyed the law schools so i doubt you know much about the constiturion lt alone how to stand on rights laid out in that document though. The judges do though... its funny to watch an attorney for a township or school distrixt rwtire because an unkicensed layman destroyed them in court. We got a few around here 🤣 killing those "law school graduates" expesnive piece of paper 🤣
I used to believe things should be that way. However, as a pro se litigant, I've experienced extreme unfairness firsthand. You can read case 23-713 in the appellate court for the 2nd circuit to understand what I mean.
B careful of letting the court interrupt u too much bc sometimes they just taking up ur time especially w a court full of ppl who the court doesn't want to let hear the case
It's funny, because the silence and horror from everyone except the Justices who all seemed slightly entertained that I asked if I could move on😅
They know I was being respectful, but I had certain things I needed to jam in.
What year is this?
The original case started in 2017, then they sued me for the website in 2019. I won in the Nebraska Supreme Court in 2023.
You can not punish someone for something that may happen in the possible future
Exactly. Especially when they are speaking the truth
The judge uses the title of Mr. To show the Pro Se litigants arent privy to know that they are not "A Title" ie Mr. You demand to be addressed by your first name... not Mr.
Don't be an idiot. This is a state Supreme Court -- they aren't going to address anyone by their first name.
I saw it as a sign of respect that he called me Mr.
@@ThePro-Se Mr. Implies that you are acting in the capacity of "A Title" which implies commerce...
@@jasondavis1502 Please stop being an idiot.
I'm not a sovereign citizen 😅
That being said, it was a good argument, eh?
A case was heard. I heard no decision made by the Judge. This was apparently only a hearing. If it has been labeled honestly, I wouldn't have wasted my time watching.
I have the opinion in the description. First...
I appreciate the view. The Justices don't decide on the spot, they have to discuss it.
You can also check out my website www.charterwestbank.com 😏
There is never an instant decision given in this court.Were you spoiled ad a child ?
I'm amazed at how many people are upset about it, despite the fact that I put "And WINS" in the title and the link in the description😅
@@Bugsy0333 Which is how you want it, right? I want judges to take their time and make a proper judgement and a final one at that. The judges in these types of appeals courts are typically really fair once you can get to them and through all the biased and corrupt small courts(also filled with nepotism and favoritism as well).
It also seems these types of judges in this type of court enjoy their jobs. They're always so chill and laid back seeming unless they're forced not to be of course.
EXACTLY
so I watch this movie and they dont show the ending????? How STUPID!!!!
law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2023/s-22-557.html
They didn't decide immediately, but it's available online.
@@ThePro-Sethank you for posting that. I believe others, interested in protecting and/or elevating their role in the legal profession, enjoy making things difficult for the rest of us. If we know how simple and unnecessary most of the legal activities truly are, it threatens the legal community.
Check out my newest video. The 8th circuit trap😁
What was the definition on the Superior Court?
I find this very disheartening not making a follow up with the resolution… is the intent to precisely produce such feelings or is just lack of interest?
law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2023/s-22-557.html
I didn't expect so many views 😅
Www.charterwestbank.com
so what happened?
I put the opinion in the description. You can also visit the website 😏
Lol....this makes no sense. I would love to hear about the alleged child support error that was affecting his credit. How does a lender report child support on a credit report. What am I missing.? This Riddle guy had ulterior motives
Well he's the DEFENDANT and not the PLAINTIFF and they're arguing before the state Supreme Court because close to half a dozen other lower courts have already ruled in the man's favor and against the bank; so considering that...do you think it perhaps more plausible that you just don't know wtf you're talking about? Especially when you don't even have the comprehension to have absorbed what was actually said! He said the bank reported a child support obligation to the FHA...not to the credit agencies. When you apply for a government housing loan the bank has to do due diligence on you before submitting your application on your behalf, they submitted false information about him to the FHA disqualifying him from applying for a home loan through the FHA. Child support obligations are not shown on your credit report, it's only seen through background checks completed by the bank as part of their due diligence. People like you already clearly know you're "missing something" but still yap your mouth before even attempting to do any research to educate yourself.
When you see what I post next, you will see the document they changed without my knowledge.
None of this was my feelings, I have the evidence.
I'll be posting it this week.
EXACTLY. It literally didn't exist, so it never affected my credit. Only FHA.
It was deliberate
Y'all are criminals both sides he buys a domain of somebody name only to sell it back
Then why do I still own it?
I bought it to prove a point. They wanted it, I named a price.
After I won in Court, I have flatly refused to sell.
@@ThePro-Se This case is so interesting to me! You did an amazing job... I'm not sure many others could have done this with the accuracy that you did! By chance do you have a link to the judgement that I could read?
@@jeremytrent3534You can find it on the Nebraska Supreme Court website in the opinions. Just search Riddle
Yes..we are not in communist China ya know….the bank could have secured their domain name themselves but either didn’t care , or didn’t think of it,,,this is the American way.. when you bought your house are you going to sell it for a profit? Hmmmm?
And it was a gripe site
You have a new subscriber, she is very attractive. I killed my pro se hearing last week. Marsden Motion fired court appointed counsel & Civil Contempt NOT GUILTY. A fan
Fantastic! And I agree she is very attractive. I think that we're going to start seeing more victories for the little guy. The system is going to see a change and I'm going to help lead it. Everybody deserves fair and equal opportunities at justice. The truth should be what matters, not who's involved.
I like your style and movement; I watch countless hours of court tv on you tube. I spent $100K on legal in 2021/2022 and fired them all. June 2024, I got an un-needed CONSERVATORSHIP DISMISSED citing abuse of court discretion & court granting temporary Conservatorship based on hypotheticals & speculation. Last week was beautiful, Marsden Motion fired court appointed counsel and held contempt hearing prose, my first time ever and killed it, NOT GUILTY. #isnt it true
That's FANTASTIC!
Davey beats Goliath!!!
😏
Wait a minute are you the actual pro-se litigant in this clip ?
Indeed I am 😏
@@ThePro-Se Congrats bro! Helluva job.
Thank you!
Who is the very attractive girl in the isle third row with the glasses and black & white sweater! Hola
A fan😅
@@ThePro-Se A fan of your channel and third row hot girl. PRO-SE movement IM IN
And she was interested in my arguments until I started attacking the system itself 😅
@@israelcruz4946 Is she a law school student by chance? This doesn't look like a typical courtroom gallery.
So, let’s get this right…..the bank can damage, defame, lie and injure a potential client, and get away with it, but as soon as that same client gets a leg up on the bank, they cry ‘foul’, and start litigation?! Isn’t retaliation, illegal?! The bank is the criminal, in this matter, obviously, even though the banks contribute to ALL judge’s election campaigns, creating an unethical conflict of interest that goes unspoken aloud, and they truly do get away with murder! See the case where a man fought the bank in 1969, (Jerome Daily, I think?) and 6 mos later, that judge was offed, in a boating accident, because Jerome Daily got his house free and clear, since the banks had created the loan from mere digits on a computer screen, and had ‘no skin’ in the game, which was, and still is, their crooked S.O.P.! (Standard operating procedure) Geez! Way past time to turn the tables on ALL the banks, again, eh!?!
Get em❤
Thanks! Please subscribe for more to come!