How Oxygen Masks Brought Down a Plane

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • The same safety feature that gives you oxygen during an airplane emergency caused a plane to crash in 1996. How did something meant to keep you safe end up killing over 100 people?
    #planecrash #oxygenmask #oxygengenerator
    You might also like:
    How can fertilizer explode?
    • How Can Fertilizer Exp...
    Chemtrails
    • Chemtrails
    What could an explosion on the sun do here on earth?
    • What Could An Explosio...
    How did climate change help turn the sky orange?
    • Why Wildfires Turn the...
    What causes auroras (and where you should see them)
    • What Causes Auroras (a...
    Credits:
    Executive Producers:
    George Zaidan
    Hilary Hudson
    Producers:
    Elaine Seward
    Andrew Sobey
    Darren Weaver
    Writer/Host:
    Alex Dainis, PhD
    Scientific consultants:
    Michelle Boucher, PhD
    John Graf, PhD
    Brianne Raccor, PhD
    Sources:
    Background on the disaster
    www.coffeytria...
    Amount of oxygen at 30,000 feet
    milehightraini...
    Size and shape of chemical oxygen generators
    lessonslearned... • Video
    Canister components
    www.darylariaw... .
    www.ntsb.gov/i...
    Decomposition reaction
    science.howstu....
    NTSB accident report
    www.ntsb.gov/i...
    How airplane oxygen generators work
    www.skybrary.a...
    Why the O2 mask might smell smokey
    www.usatoday.c....
    The role of barium peroxide in chemical oxygen generators
    pubs.acs.org/d...
    Amount of oxygen generated
    lessonslearned...
    Oxygen candle use on submarines and ISS
    • How Do Nuclear Submari...
    www.space.com/...
    FAA Accident lessons learned
    lessonslearned...
    Contractor found guilty, mechanic still on the run
    www.nytimes.co... .
    www.clickorlan... ; www.fbi.gov/ne...
    Oxygen jar experiment
    pubs.acs.org/d...
    Fire melted aluminum components
    www.washington...
    Safety regulations changed after the crash
    www.wtsp.com/a...

Комментарии • 67

  • @rburghiu
    @rburghiu 2 года назад +39

    The NTSB had been trying to get fire detection and suppression systems installed in cargo holds for years. However, the industry and the FAA had resisted such moves. This accident is what forced their hand.
    Also, the canisters were placed in cardboard boxes, which is why the fire started, as the incredibly high temperatures ignited the cardboard, which helped spread the fire and activated the rest of the canisters.

  • @ACSReactions
    @ACSReactions  2 года назад +40

    A totally different oxygen safety feature caused a Qantas airlines accident in 2008! An oxygen tank designed to be used in the cockpit exploded and ripped a hole through the side of the plane, forcing an emergency landing. Thankfully, everyone made it back to the ground safely.
    EDIT: The list of ingredients we show at 1:25 can vary. Manufacturers usually include a cation source (like lithium, sodium, or potassium) and an oxygen source, like chlorate or perchlorate. Together with a promoter like iron and a chlorine scavenger like barium peroxide, these ingredients react to make breathable oxygen!

  • @fatsquirrel75
    @fatsquirrel75 2 года назад +27

    Great video, well written and well presented. Loving this channel. Keep it up.

    • @mikojones591
      @mikojones591 2 года назад

      The headline is miss leading. It was not the oxygen mask that caused the accident, it was the oxygen generators stored improperly in the cargos.

  • @hi6go7
    @hi6go7 2 года назад +15

    I always thought that the O2 in that system was ram air for some reason. Thanks for clearing up a misconception I never knew I had!

  • @pabloascencio7397
    @pabloascencio7397 2 года назад +16

    Safety Last, it's sad regulations come after people die.

    • @sinecurve9999
      @sinecurve9999 2 года назад +2

      Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.

    • @jonas90.
      @jonas90. 2 года назад +3

      It's also a fact that new accidents happen, because one doesn't know that is a possible outcome and then the regulations get better and more secure. Not saying we should be easy on this (this case in particular of course bot) but sometimes big accidents happen and we just don't yet how to solve them because it was never an issue.

    • @jamiehughes5573
      @jamiehughes5573 Год назад

      No progress without risks

  • @msaditu
    @msaditu 2 года назад +4

    So happy to see Dr. Dainis back on this channel. Very interesting video.

    • @AlexDainisPhD
      @AlexDainisPhD 2 года назад +2

      Thank you!! I'm super glad to be back :)

  • @xylafoxlin
    @xylafoxlin 2 года назад +10

    I had no idea about any of this!! Sooo cool

  • @stevefrandsen
    @stevefrandsen 2 года назад +3

    Saw this on Airplane Disasters. So tragic and so preventable.

  • @rfldss89
    @rfldss89 2 года назад +16

    Oh its like the oxygen candles on submarines! Destin from smartereveryday showed one in his submarine series :)

    • @AlexDainisPhD
      @AlexDainisPhD 2 года назад +7

      Yes! I totally watched his video when I was writing this one to see what the sub ones looked like. So much bigger!

    • @rfldss89
      @rfldss89 2 года назад +4

      @@AlexDainisPhD so cool! Great video btw, like many acs videos it explained something i didnt know i wanted to know, but I'm glad i do now :p

    • @mortified776
      @mortified776 2 года назад +2

      @@AlexDainisPhD Yeah! The explosion on HMS _Tireless_ under the ice cap in 2007 that killed two sailors was apparently one of those going off.

    • @justinyang21114798
      @justinyang21114798 2 года назад +2

      They also use these candles on space stations! There was one incident on Mir with these candles that nearly ended up in a disaster.

  • @IanGrams
    @IanGrams 2 года назад +8

    Great to see Dr. Dainis on here! I'd known some sort of chemical generator was used but didn't realize it's essentially the same thing as oxygen candles used in submarines.

    • @AlexDainisPhD
      @AlexDainisPhD 2 года назад +4

      Isn't it cool! I loved that the same tech was used in subs and on the ISS!

    • @IanGrams
      @IanGrams 2 года назад +3

      @@AlexDainisPhD too darn cool. The ISS part was wholly new to me. It makes sense they'd need emergency backup and since subs have been using them for a while it's tried and tested. I'd totally be down for a whole episode about how the ISS maintains a breathable atmosphere in non-emergency situations.

    • @MallocArray
      @MallocArray 2 года назад

      I didn't even know oxygen candles were a thing until the Smarter Every Day series that discussed it.

  • @garycard1456
    @garycard1456 2 года назад +8

    It would be interesting to simulate the reaction in the chemlab using a small pile of the reagents on a heatproof mat, just to get an appreciation for what would be happening inside the canisters. Monitor the exotherm using an infrared digital thermometer. Visually, I imagine that there'd be a feint orange glow, produced by the oxidation of the iron. A little hisssssssssss from the oxygen gas produced. I think potassium chlorate can be substituted for the sodium salt. The advantage of the potassium salt is that it is not hygroscopic.

  • @aliannarodriguez1581
    @aliannarodriguez1581 7 месяцев назад +1

    Wow, I’m amazed I was unaware of this accident. Very well told and I also learned the importance of that sharp tug in activating the mask. They sort of tell you to do that, but without understanding the reason I doubt I would have remembered it.

  • @Little-bird-told-me
    @Little-bird-told-me Год назад +1

    *Best Channel* . Kuddos to the makers for actually dressing as an _airhostess_ and getting an oxygen mask

  • @AlexHurleyMusic
    @AlexHurleyMusic 5 месяцев назад

    Just one thing to mention is that if you're flying at cruising altitude and you lost pressure, without a mask you don't suffocate, you're still breathing in air but it's thinner and has a lower oxygen saturation. You don't suffocate, the medical term for it is Hypoxia and it's deadly, because rather than suffocating and struggling to breathe, you just slowly become more and more disorentated the longer you're left without a mask until you pass out and eventually die. The worst part about it is that it feels like being drunk or high. You become confused, some people become delierious, some people become aggressive and it intensifies and then eventually, you pass out. They're serious when they say put yours on before anyone else around you.

  • @mikojones591
    @mikojones591 2 года назад +1

    The HEADLINE is MISLEADING. It was not the oxygen mask that caused the accident, it was the oxygen generators stored improperly in the cargos.

  • @System32F
    @System32F 2 года назад +1

    As a Pilot watching this video you did a good job on this video explaining but You said emergency decent profile to get you back on the ground its not really for that its just for us to get to 10,000 feet, for thicker air so everyone can breath if you have poor lung function you still might struggle but you'll be alive, we could be right in the middle of the Atlantic ocean and we will do the same thing and fly to the nearest available runway which can be really far, In the cockpit we have gas tanks supplying us with plenty of oxygen attendants also have tanks they can carry, and they will have spares.

  • @GrantSR
    @GrantSR Год назад +1

    I had to breath from an oxygen candle during Marine Corps Flight Deck Firefighting Training. I was amazed at how bad it DIDN'T smell. It just smelled like air (and sweaty Marines) to me.

  • @darkendkefka
    @darkendkefka 2 года назад +5

    Awesome video, but all of Alex's content is great

  • @niko-7417
    @niko-7417 2 года назад +1

    Subbed.
    This random Knowledge is what I crave.
    Also everything was well explained and interesting. Love this stuff

    • @mikojones591
      @mikojones591 2 года назад

      Just before you get all excitedThe headline is miss leading. It was not the oxygen mask that come from the ceiling that caused the accident, it was the oxygen generators stored improperly in the cargos.

  • @edgeeffect
    @edgeeffect Год назад

    This is making me think of the fire during Gerry Linegar's stay on the Mir space station.

  • @Bludgeoned2DEATH2
    @Bludgeoned2DEATH2 2 года назад +3

    Welcome back Dr. Alex! :D

    • @AlexDainisPhD
      @AlexDainisPhD 2 года назад +5

      Thank you!!! I'm so excited to be back :)

  • @crgauth
    @crgauth 2 года назад +2

    So the headline is a bit misleading. It was not the units that were carried on the plane. It was extras being carried for maintenance. And it was because they were stored improperly.

  • @BeCurieUs
    @BeCurieUs 2 года назад +1

    'fun' fact, when they (NTSB) were testing this theory, they almost destoryed their test chamber because the reaction was so hot.

  • @metamorphiczeolite
    @metamorphiczeolite 2 года назад

    Another great video! Really, all the videos on this channel are so good. Thanks, ACS.

  • @XSpImmaLion
    @XSpImmaLion 2 года назад +1

    Is that the compound Destin from SmarterEveryDay showed in a military submarine sometime ago? Interesting and good to know...

  • @epb22
    @epb22 Год назад

    Nice crisp explanation, thx.

  • @relaxingnature2617
    @relaxingnature2617 Год назад +1

    The plane hit in a vertical dive , hitting the shallow water extremely fast ..it punched thru the bedrock to a lower void , much of the plane remains lost

  • @compassroses
    @compassroses 2 года назад +1

    Hell! ""Things will go wrong in any given situation, if you give them a chance."

  • @saeedgnu
    @saeedgnu Год назад

    Great, another source of anxiety during flights: tiny bombs over our heads...

  • @MrMysticphantom
    @MrMysticphantom 2 года назад +1

    woah heres someone i havent seen making science vids in a while

  • @LawpickingLocksmith
    @LawpickingLocksmith Год назад

    They should have flown the solid boosters in one piece for the space shuttles instead building them in bits with O-rings.

  • @user-user.user-user
    @user-user.user-user 2 года назад +2

    1000°F??!! METRIC PLEASE!

  • @quashiesuzanne
    @quashiesuzanne 2 года назад

    Great information, sorry for the deaths.

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman6365 2 года назад

    My goodness! I'm carrying my own O2 supply and personal parachute bag from the nxt flight.

  • @cameronidk2
    @cameronidk2 2 года назад

    Wow, and awful.... oh by the way ..Second video of yours I've watched ... great content.. .. for the record I'm not sure what industry standards are or the right correction is here.... You have beautiful hair.. half way through this video my brain went "What just happened" at first i thought your part went the other direction.. but i think you have a habit of putting your hair behind your ear ..you look great either way ... But if your going to edit out the motion of your hand putting your hair behind your ear .it causes a bit of emersion breaking . Well it causes the brain to focus on some thing other then your excellent break downs and knowledge sharing.

  • @twothreebravo
    @twothreebravo 2 года назад

    Jet tires can't melt aluminum beams! (Of course they can, this incident was horrific)

  • @NoxmilesDe
    @NoxmilesDe 2 года назад

    What is Fahrenheit?

  • @forrestallison1879
    @forrestallison1879 Год назад

    "if your airplane starts to go down"? No, if it loses pressure.

  • @dj_laundry_list
    @dj_laundry_list Год назад

    I like the way she makes "L" sounds. But how does she do that???

  • @FriedConsole
    @FriedConsole 2 года назад

    I remember the ValuJet crash and the sexism because it was woman pilot there was a lot of talk that it was her fault.

  • @JuliusUnique
    @JuliusUnique 2 года назад

    on board*

  • @kamiln62
    @kamiln62 Год назад

    The masks are not released because plane is going down 🙄🙄 they will drop only in case of pressure loss which doesn’t mean the plane is going down😅

    • @speedbird9313
      @speedbird9313 9 месяцев назад

      Correct👍🏻They will drop at a certain sensed altitude, so they may also drop in case of lack of pressure.

  • @DraconicA5
    @DraconicA5 2 года назад +6

    Please use universal unit system! I'm so disappointed whenever I saw a science channel is only using imperial system. This could be a reason why your channel is so low on view, don't you think?

    • @Amrith369
      @Amrith369 2 года назад +7

      They should include metrics, but I doubt it’s impacting their view count. Most of the audience for these videos probably aren’t stingy scientists.

    • @tugloo1
      @tugloo1 2 года назад +4

      aviation is mostly imperial.

    • @k9techku
      @k9techku 2 года назад

      Pedantic much? Usually it's us Yanks demanding everything in our measurements...

    • @michaelbenkstein7972
      @michaelbenkstein7972 2 года назад +1

      AND we have found our Sheldon Cooper 🤣