Yeah they’ll of realised that whatever is in it is nutritional enough to make a calve grow into a cow, so it should be more than adequate for sustaining human beings. So, they actually probably thought about it first before wanking a cow off by its tits.. even though you would like to think it was the other way round.
They kept calves around as a future food source (having abducted them from their mothers or even more likely having killed and eaten their mothers). Some of these fat ,waiting around protein sources may have been mated by wild bulls ended up pregnant and thus began producing milk. Eventually the food seeking humans cottoned on to the fact they could have milk before meat and the dairy industry was born.
When he said, "Some say," I thought for sure he was going to continue with something that ended with, "All we know for sure is, they call him The Stig."
Humans are still evolving, we've just changed the game a bit. More than likely we will eventually begin manipulating our own evolution by altering genes directly but that is probably a ways off yet though certainly foreseeable. There are people around the world with mutation so incredible that if we put them all together we would essentially have a "super-human" with hyper dense bones and muscles, resilience to even the most devastating diseases, ability to see farther into each end of the light spectrum, and many others. All kinds of things that natural evolution has already introduced into our genome. All that is needed is to find out which genes are responsible in these individuals/families and see if they can be made compatible with others. I know how all this might sound but science fiction was so last decade, the more we learn about the universe we live in the more the word "impossible" is becoming irrelevant.
For example, questions such as "Why do people in general have a conscience?", "Why do we ponder the meaning of life?", "Why is nature so soothing and enjoyable to us?" "Why can we enjoy and create art, such as music?", and "Why are our feelings so dynamic compared to any other animal?" remain unanswered when it comes to evolution. The idea of a creator makes so much more sense.
Wow. Just found this channel.Great knowledge packed in a small and easily understood form! Thanks for this and for the always so witty humor of James May
I agree with Sir David Attenborough that human evolution has effectively stopped. I would go even further by saying that I believe we are working to reverse it. Not only are less intelligent people more likely to reproduce, many otherwise intelligent people actively seeking out less intelligent mates because a hopeful failure is more interesting than a boring success.
It will keep going, just more like the panda and koala where they are fatally dependent on their unique food sources to survive, the majority of our species will perish if access to artificial insulin and antihistamines were interrupted by natural disaster.
He said this because he was desperately trying to avoid the reality of racial differences. His statement was political, not scientific. It was also a profoundly contemptible example of intellectual cowardice.
Your lactose comment is incorrect on a global scale. 95 percent of European people can digest lactose but somewhere down to 10 percent of African populations can and about 35 percent of Asians are lactose tolerant.
+August MacFarland This is so. Additionally, in order to produce lactase (which enables us to digest lactose) we have to continue to drink milk continuously during the period at about 18 months when humans stop producing lactase - we are forcing our bodies to keep producing it artificially extending our ability to do so. My understanding is that lactose intolerance is the global norm....the Western diet is the main factor.
I think because of our rapid growth of intelligence. We tend to rely on knowledge rather than instinct... Plus with all this new technology, (survival) instinct doesn't exactly play a role anymore...? It's a strange topic because I have friends that have no second thought on anything they do, they can simply do it, but as for me I'm constantly on the fence with things. For example I have friends that can throw themselves into a 180 backflip off a 2 meter high platform, and there's me... doing the recording. I tend to think some are just born with a hard-head.
Because humans have the neocortex that other animals do not. Reptilian cortex only works ( instincts) when you shut down your neocortex. In that case, there would be no apparent discrepancy between an alligator and human:)
Existence of people like you, proves that we are still evolving. Thanks to your channel RUclips just got a thousand times better:) Thanks a lot, James and co!
ThatGuyWithAVest think i care about grammar in a youtube comment section? SERIOUSLY? XD besides, i was just making fun of the "hardcore deniers" i dont understand how you could NOT see the joke, that says alot about you tho :D ps; on the sidenote, i LOVE when people think im stupid and dumb, that way when i hit them back they sink along with the ship :D
xGoodOldSmurfehx Says the guy with the name *xGoodOldSmurfehx* and a generic profile pic. I have a good sense of humour. I joke most of the time actually. Sometimes maybe too much... I know you were likely joking. But it's the internet, you never know. I just pointed out you are actually not very bright. I did not say I'm intelligent. Although, most definitely more intelligent than you.
Highest Ive heard of a cat falling and surviving is 19 stories from an apartment window. Its only injury was bruised lungs. I remember hearing that because of a cats weight to surface area ratio it doesn't accelerate as quickly as a human that's falling.They also kinda spread out their legs once they are oriented so it makes a kind of umbrella. Takes longer to hit terminal velocity.Then when it lands the force is spread between it's four feet, instead of us dividing the force between our 2 feet.
"Can we talk about evolution and creation?" - "Yes, we can!" - Proceeds to talk about evolution. I guess that goes back to "...but if it's too difficult, I'll ignore it."
Although your conclusions are correct, your explanation is wrong. Or rather, it neglects an important field of science: Epigenetics. You, like many people, over value the role of random mutation. I could go on and on about the differences, but suffice to say that your body is capable of adapting to environmental conditions at a genetic level in real time. This is the only process of evolutionary science that has been directly proven by direct observation. In one example, scientists studied the different kinds of Finches of the Galapagos islands and found that the differences between the different "species" were not genetic at all, but rather they were Epigenetic. No mutation played a role in the changes. This idea is nothing new though. Back in the time of Darwin a competing theory had it that the Giraffe has a long neck simply because it stretched it out. Now, don't get me wrong, mutation does play a role. At the point that humans broke away from apes a mutation developed in the jaw muscles significantly weakening while preventing the skull plates from fusing. All humans have this broken gene. However, when comparing all the differences that developed later between humans and apes the vast majority are epigenetic. Not only does this work on a long term scale, but it works in a single generation with a link between nature and nurture being explained. Many terminal cancers once thought to be the result of random mutation can be explained as an adverse epigenetic change which can be corrected via drugs that alter the methyl markers. The mind has also been found to have a role in how these changes form, showing a possible explanation for how individual belief in getting better can correct cancers that are the result of such changes. Even more interesting is the role this process has in an Atavism and so-called "Junk DNA". Unused genetic traits don't simple "evolve away", they remain encoded - moved aside. The epigenome retains all of this information and can draw on it when circumstances require it. People may think of an Atavism as little more than an "evolutionary throwback", but if a trait helps the species survive it is moving forward. The anthropological record fully supports this interpretation. Evolutionary scientists who use the mutation approach will tell us that it is the result of many tiny changes over a long period of time, but the Anthropological record shows that a given species will go mostly unchanged for sometimes hundreds of thousands of years and then in the span of a relatively shorter period of time coinciding with a dramatic environmental change the biology will change just as dramatically. This very observation is used by anti-evolution theorists to support their argument, which wouldn't be possible if scientists would be quicker to embrace new knowledge instead of holding onto outdated models. This altogether is why humans continue to adapt to a changing set of conditions. Sickle cell anemia is an adaptation to avoid malaria, but comes with it's own problem. I myself never had an Appendix to begin with which is a great adaptation to the American diet which can lead to it being damaged, but as a consequence I don't have it as a safe house for beneficial bacteria and cannot as easily digest nuts and grains. I still have the genes for an Appendix, but those genes are turned off. I am "evolved" in the sense that I am adapted to a circumstance in the environment. My point is that you cannot fully understand evolutionary science or accurately explain it without including all of the relevant science. I wish people like you would make use of new knowledge.
Asking a question is not ignorance, quite often it leads to learning. Criticizing stupid questions creates ignorance because it leads to the fear of asking.
I agree with you. Saying it this way is misleading at best. Even if he would be talking about white British adults, the number would be 95.3% according to "Prevalence of lactase deficiency in British adults". Talking about "us" as in "the world population" it seems to be even farther off. Wikipedia says about 25% of humans are lactose-tolerant.
Correct, that's sometimes referred to as descent with medication. A much more compelling example would be to separate the litter of pups into two groups that never intermingle and over the course of many generations observe that the two groups look and act differently, despite the fact that they shared a common ancestor. Eventually, you'd have a situation like donkeys and mules, which can't produce fertile offspring, but are closely related and share a common ancestor.
I would much rather enjoy my life to be narrated by you, Mr. May, than Morgan Freeman. Soothing, well articulated and intelligent sentences make me feel all warm inside. Here's my question: As the human population is increasing at a rapid rate, we exhaust all natural resources. So, at some point commuting and logistics might end up being so expensive, that motor transport will become too costly. What is the energy source of the future? Solar, Hydrogen? Also, elaborate on hydrogen electrolysis.
This is like asking if the gradient between red and blue is complete when you have thousands of colors, it's almost impossible to complete because there isn't any real discernible moment where red becomes blue.
The best example of this is how now we can learn calculus or electronics since high school. And just the genius by the time it was invented understood it.
I have some questions: how do unconditioned reflexes work? how are animal instincts transmitted through generations? why do we cry? were ninjas really able to run on water?
James, You focused mostly on physical evolution, have you put much thought into the internet, social media, databases, communications. Individually we may not be evolving but as a society we are, one might consider the internet & its traffic a sort of hive mind. 'I don't need to have a big amazing brain, just access to everyone elses' Thanks, Daniel
I suppose you are right in that respect, I certainly hadn't looked at it from that point of view before. You defiantly have some interesting points that are worth investigating however, and have peaked my interest. It seems I have some research to keep myself busy with for the time being.
May, can you make a video about computation, turing machines and the limits of modern computers (that sad "not everything is computable" thing), and here's the tricky part: Do you think that sometime down the line we'll have different kinds of computers capable of doing what integrated circuits cannot do? Things like bio computation will handle what our silicon chips can't compute? Non linear/heuristic stuff... Brain simulation? Thanks for the videos, you're awesome! Greetings from SP, Brazil
It's really simple! It can float due to density and buoyancy. Boats displace the equivalent amount of water when they press down on the body of water, which meanwhile pushes up and keeps the boat afloat. This is why the bottoms of ships are hollow. Anything that is less dense than water can float.
We need only look at the last 500 years of our world. 500 years ago, the average hight of a person was, say 4.5 ft, now it's about 6 ft... thats a simple easy way of seeing, whilst we're still human, we ARE changing. No we might not be growing extra limbs, but we're growing bigger. Simple, evolution is constant, never ending.
You know why I can't except evolution as fact? Because of how 'perfect' everything turned out. I mean, not absolute perfection, but just how organized the earth is, and how organized he universe is. Think of all the mathematical laws which govern everything; I always thought that the concept of undirected events = chaos and directed events = organization was being overlooked when it came to evolution.
Why are some people taller than others? Of all the common characteristics we share as humans, how come height is one of the most distinguishable? Why does it vary even with siblings. And more importantly why do the bones grow vertically or length wise, and why not width wise too?
Evolution is never complete. Even if your body isn't changing on the macroscopic level, the cells themselves will figure ways to maximize efficiency in a world where the environment is increasingly dynamic. Also, evolution isn't restricted to biology. The current challenge is how efficiently we are maintaining our collective well-being on this planet, and our ability to survive in years to come.
Well the only interesting thing I have to add is... My daughter is half black and half white and is one of the a smartest children in her grade. She is a tag student and has always been really advanced. Most of the children she is in school with are white or not mixed race. She was the only tag student in her grade for the last two years. Now there are other tag students in her grade. Also she was the only 4th grader in the Geo bee (like a spelling bee but with Geography.) I have to say I am a proud mama. She is also very beautiful and one of my best friends. She is fun, funny and a good kid most of the time! I would and will protect her with my life!!!😉
Yami, the evolution for giraffe's are already pretty well documented. We do know the genes and the fitness would involve several things, access to more food/resources and (I think more significantly) the ability to see farther, to be more aware of predators and competition.
Over a long period of time yes, but the heat is not the main problem. The real situation is that the rise in temperature would cause large amounts of ice to melt, and the ocean levels to rise significantly and therefore rise above land close to sea level. We would adapt to the heat rather than evolve, just as you adapt to the heat if you go and live in a warmer country.
This is one of my favorite channels so thank you very much. My question is : why ants carry large objects that may be four or five of their size ?!!!!!!
I can answer that for you (learned in 7th and 8th grade): Yes. Light can carry energy. Or if you mean electricity: yes, every morning you put your electric toothbrush into its stand, it's happening. And then there are plenty of other wireless forms: microwaves, radiowaves.. see tesla.
Because intelligence is not a necessity for survival. The only reason humans evolved such a massive intelligence in the first place was to improve our chances of survival with lack of any other means. We aren't especially fast or strong but we were intelligent so, taking the path of less resistance, we started getting smarter to cope with a world where pretty much everything can kill us. Other animals didn't need to because they had other means of survival independent of intelligence.
Hello Head Squeeze! I am from Mexico and hence my question: Is there any reason to believe that societies who live in significantly harsher gepgraphic and climatic conditions (I am thinking of northern Europe for example) will work more efficiently and be more prosperous as opposed to those living in places where the climate is good an resources are widely available? I hope that my Q. Turns out to be interesting, oh and I would also like a t-shirt! Thanks!
You can't understand a simple relative term yet you think you understand the science behind one of the most well supported answer in science that you can disprove it.
That's an example of an environmental pressure. What happens is that gradually those within the populations that developed a random mutation which counters this environmental pressure are able to out compete those that do not (in terms of survival and reproduction). There are neutral random mutations all the time, sometimes by accident these turn out to be beneficial for survival. This is also why most species that have ever lived go extinct, they weren't lucky enough to have the right genes.
It's what we call the 'Reward System'; the release of dopamine upon consumption of the things you listed causes us to enjoy it. In the case of things like drugs and alcohol, the physical and mental 'highness' are sought for again by the brain, resulting in more needing consumption, then dependence, and finally, addiction.
We are evolving, but we’ll never know the outcome until someone a million years from now tells someone the history of which we are living. We can not see into the future.
I have a question here. Why is it we can taste things by smell sometimes, and how come an apple, potato, and onion are supposed to taste the same if you eat it with your nose plugged. Lastly why is it sent can make you feel nostalgic. Like bringing back a childhood feeling even if you can't remember exactly what that memory was. P.S. I'm a size small maybe medium, (102lbs 5'4") please send me a T-Shirt!!
This is something i've been pondering about for a while but never really got into the details. Because of the way a cat lands, we understand that a cat could die from a fall of the 2nd story of a building however survive 3rd as they have enough time to prepare them selves for landing, by this time the cat is traveling at terminal velocity; does this mean if you drop a cat from the each of the earth atmosphere, it would survive? then again, what is the highest a cat could be... and still survive?
About the wisdom teeth: It’s not that people are being born without them (well technically they are but you know what I mean.) The basics are that people no longer hold their bodily or tongue posture correctly anymore which is actually vital for proper facial development. If you don’t breath through the nose, the jaw and face become elongated instead of wide, hence a lot of overcrowding, as the adequate room for teeth simply hasn’t been developed, because the forces which develop it, from the cheeks, tongue lips whilst resting and swallowing, weren’t present. This means that the jaw is too small, and therefore there simply isn’t space for the wisdom teeth to erupt. It’s not that they’ve been deleted from our genetic code or anything like that. Also diet effects this, as we used to have a very hard, low calorie diet and now it’s a very soft, calorie dense diet. Our jaws/face aren’t doing nearly as much work as they used to. Look at a skull from 12,000 plus years ago. They all have perfect teeth, and perfect cheekbones which project forward. Instead of shallow like most people of today. That’s because it was before farming was utilised and we still had our facial/bodily functions operating correctly and at full capacity. It’s the same as how people’s bones are no longer bowed from muscle stress like is common to see from ancient bones. We’re simply not doing the same work we were, which we’re supposed to do to grow properly, and therefore we are not growing properly.
Lol! I have no wisdom teeth and when I asked my dentist why he said he same: "it's evolution, mate! No more eating of roots or raw meat. You're mutated." It was so cool. It felt as if I were Wolverine.
It's amazing how humans have spent hundreds of thousands of years trying to survive, learning how to hunt, trap or gather. But now that we have supermarkets and homes, we've pretty much forgotten it all. Why didn't the survival skills of the last 500,000 years get passed down through evolution?
The astronomers monitor a star's brightness with the Hubble telescope, what they look for is minor dimming in the star's brightness, which indicates that a planet is passing it nearby, by the magnitude of the dimming they can calculate the radius of the planet but not much more.
they also didn't have the population we do. with the size of our population, we can have more people working toward a common goal, producing results much faster, unless they call themselves a think tank, in which case nothing will ever be done.
Yes, it is about classifying species based on similarities in their characteristics. In this case, the homologene is a tool for comparing the genetic similarities according to any sequence (almost any) type. And even the tool demonstrates that the molecular biological evidence supports our models of evolution, as do the fossil records, the chronologies and the general morphologies. None of the evidence refutes the model -- and that should be easy to do, if the model was wrong.
No. Sound is pressure waves in air (or any other medium) that we detect though a stretched drum, small bones and nerves in our ears. Light is carried by photons, which are fundamental particles acting themselves like waves. Our eyes detect these photons through lenses, light sensitive cells and nerves in our eyes. While some aspects of sound and light are similar (or analogous), they are very different phenomena and can't be detected with the same instruments like eyes or ears.
If they eat a species similar to themselves (closely related from an evolutionary point of view) that would be true yet. :) Also, we can indeed eat raw meat, It just heightens the chance of infection, so when we started frying our meat it made it easier to digest, ergo easier for our bodies to utilize, lowered the risk of infection, effectively heightening the chance of survival, and it gave the evolution of humans a boost. So I wouldn't assume that other carnivores don't get infections either.
Evolution will never be complete because we live in an ever changing and chaotic universe ! ,therefore we constantly need to adapt . The longer we are around as a species the more genetic material there is to choose from. This makes us more likely to survive any changes. As a species we need as many different ethnicities , religions sizes ,shapes and abilities all mixed together to ensure our survival ....!
James May, will we ever be able to replicate perpetual motion, or anything close to it (for example, something that would run for years without needing a refill of some kind)? My friend in my class is always planning a plan for a machine for perpetual motion, mostly including magnets, and whenever he presents his idea, our physics teacher explains why it won't work.
Actually, giraffes only eat from bushes. They have long necks, so they can look farther. they can warn other giraffes, keep watch over offspring, and detect predators :)
Finally a video that doesn't get evolution wrong. My only criticism is that the way he explains the bit about wisdom teeth implies that we've lost them *because* we no longer eat the same things and so we just got rid of them, but it's actually occurred naturally and just *isn't important* because we no longer eat the same things, so there's no reason a person without wisdom teeth shouldn't survive.
Well, I have a question: In case we find an intelligent alien life form, how would we talk to them? More specificly, in what language could we have a conversation? And what would we tell them?
Here's a thought. Who milked the first cow? And what the _hell_ were they thinking?
well maybe they wanted to know what cows milk tasted like and the human women didn't want to breast feed a grown man....
***** Dude. they looked a Calves and thought i also think that be good idea
What about cheese just let it sit for u a couple of months till it smells horrible and still eat it.
Yeah they’ll of realised that whatever is in it is nutritional enough to make a calve grow into a cow, so it should be more than adequate for sustaining human beings.
So, they actually probably thought about it first before wanking a cow off by its tits.. even though you would like to think it was the other way round.
They kept calves around as a future food source (having abducted them from their mothers or even more likely having killed and eaten their mothers). Some of these fat ,waiting around protein sources may have been mated by wild bulls ended up pregnant and thus began producing milk.
Eventually the food seeking humans cottoned on to the fact they could have milk before meat and the dairy industry was born.
When he said, "Some say," I thought for sure he was going to continue with something that ended with, "All we know for sure is, they call him The Stig."
1:42 'Or a stick insect that can disguise itself as a Stig.'
+ian1231100 he said stick
+Musicrafter | Music and Games Some say...
+Musicrafter | Music and Games top gear reference.
+ian1231100 Some say he disguised himself as an insect. -Top gear.
The Stig You're supposed to be silent, so you shut up.
The x-factor remark at the end, almost wet myself :D Great stuff!
Humans are still evolving, we've just changed the game a bit. More than likely we will eventually begin manipulating our own evolution by altering genes directly but that is probably a ways off yet though certainly foreseeable. There are people around the world with mutation so incredible that if we put them all together we would essentially have a "super-human" with hyper dense bones and muscles, resilience to even the most devastating diseases, ability to see farther into each end of the light spectrum, and many others. All kinds of things that natural evolution has already introduced into our genome. All that is needed is to find out which genes are responsible in these individuals/families and see if they can be made compatible with others. I know how all this might sound but science fiction was so last decade, the more we learn about the universe we live in the more the word "impossible" is becoming irrelevant.
Hah, I heard "insect that can disguise himself as a Stig" :D
Same here. I can't help it, when James says 'stick' he seems to be saying 'Stig'...
No better way to explain things than a british gentelman
I feel vaguely offended by the premise that my parents have done the deed. My father was a sperm donor, so he and my mother never did... that bit.
For example, questions such as "Why do people in general have a conscience?", "Why do we ponder the meaning of life?", "Why is nature so soothing and enjoyable to us?" "Why can we enjoy and create art, such as music?", and "Why are our feelings so dynamic compared to any other animal?" remain unanswered when it comes to evolution. The idea of a creator makes so much more sense.
Wow. Just found this channel.Great knowledge packed in a small and easily understood form! Thanks for this and for the always so witty humor of James May
I agree with Sir David Attenborough that human evolution has effectively stopped. I would go even further by saying that I believe we are working to reverse it. Not only are less intelligent people more likely to reproduce, many otherwise intelligent people actively seeking out less intelligent mates because a hopeful failure is more interesting than a boring success.
It will keep going, just more like the panda and koala where they are fatally dependent on their unique food sources to survive, the majority of our species will perish if access to artificial insulin and antihistamines were interrupted by natural disaster.
Truly intelligent ppl wouldn't simply reproduce with someone dumb. " The more intelligent you become the more selective you are" Tesla
He said this because he was desperately trying to avoid the reality of racial differences. His statement was political, not scientific.
It was also a profoundly contemptible example of intellectual cowardice.
Your lactose comment is incorrect on a global scale. 95 percent of European people can digest lactose but somewhere down to 10 percent of African populations can and about 35 percent of Asians are lactose tolerant.
+August MacFarland This is so. Additionally, in order to produce lactase (which enables us to digest lactose) we have to continue to drink milk continuously during the period at about 18 months when humans stop producing lactase - we are forcing our bodies to keep producing it artificially extending our ability to do so. My understanding is that lactose intolerance is the global norm....the Western diet is the main factor.
Thank you. I hate watching these "informative" videos with such glaring misinformation.
Why do Humans think about things and do not just follow instincts?
I think because of our rapid growth of intelligence. We tend to rely on knowledge rather than instinct... Plus with all this new technology, (survival) instinct doesn't exactly play a role anymore...? It's a strange topic because I have friends that have no second thought on anything they do, they can simply do it, but as for me I'm constantly on the fence with things. For example I have friends that can throw themselves into a 180 backflip off a 2 meter high platform, and there's me... doing the recording.
I tend to think some are just born with a hard-head.
Because humans have the neocortex that other animals do not. Reptilian cortex only works ( instincts) when you shut down your neocortex. In that case, there would be no apparent discrepancy between an alligator and human:)
Because we would still be living in caves if we did so.
Existence of people like you, proves that we are still evolving. Thanks to your channel RUclips just got a thousand times better:) Thanks a lot, James and co!
Whaat the hell, vsauce did an episode on it, can't believe I've missed a vsauce video, thank you!
we are still evolving, the proof: im more intelligent than anyone i ever interacted with
there, i proved it :D
xGoodOldSmurfehx I hope you are actually not serious. You seem very, VERY dumb. Considering your grammar.
ThatGuyWithAVest
think i care about grammar in a youtube comment section? SERIOUSLY? XD
besides, i was just making fun of the "hardcore deniers"
i dont understand how you could NOT see the joke, that says alot about you tho :D
ps; on the sidenote, i LOVE when people think im stupid and dumb, that way when i hit them back they sink along with the ship :D
xGoodOldSmurfehx
Every intelligent person does. Thanks for proving my point.
xGoodOldSmurfehx
Says the guy with the name *xGoodOldSmurfehx* and a generic profile pic.
I have a good sense of humour. I joke most of the time actually. Sometimes maybe too much... I know you were likely joking. But it's the internet, you never know. I just pointed out you are actually not very bright. I did not say I'm intelligent. Although, most definitely more intelligent than you.
ThatGuyWithAVest
riiight, you know whos the most intelligent of us? me, because im walking away and letting you post more comments :D
"assuming we can find a willing partner"
>implying
Would we overpopulate out into space?
Highest Ive heard of a cat falling and surviving is 19 stories from an apartment window. Its only injury was bruised lungs. I remember hearing that because of a cats weight to surface area ratio it doesn't accelerate as quickly as a human that's falling.They also kinda spread out their legs once they are oriented so it makes a kind of umbrella. Takes longer to hit terminal velocity.Then when it lands the force is spread between it's four feet, instead of us dividing the force between our 2 feet.
"Can we talk about evolution and creation?" - "Yes, we can!" - Proceeds to talk about evolution. I guess that goes back to "...but if it's too difficult, I'll ignore it."
Although your conclusions are correct, your explanation is wrong. Or rather, it neglects an important field of science: Epigenetics. You, like many people, over value the role of random mutation. I could go on and on about the differences, but suffice to say that your body is capable of adapting to environmental conditions at a genetic level in real time. This is the only process of evolutionary science that has been directly proven by direct observation. In one example, scientists studied the different kinds of Finches of the Galapagos islands and found that the differences between the different "species" were not genetic at all, but rather they were Epigenetic. No mutation played a role in the changes. This idea is nothing new though. Back in the time of Darwin a competing theory had it that the Giraffe has a long neck simply because it stretched it out.
Now, don't get me wrong, mutation does play a role. At the point that humans broke away from apes a mutation developed in the jaw muscles significantly weakening while preventing the skull plates from fusing. All humans have this broken gene. However, when comparing all the differences that developed later between humans and apes the vast majority are epigenetic. Not only does this work on a long term scale, but it works in a single generation with a link between nature and nurture being explained. Many terminal cancers once thought to be the result of random mutation can be explained as an adverse epigenetic change which can be corrected via drugs that alter the methyl markers. The mind has also been found to have a role in how these changes form, showing a possible explanation for how individual belief in getting better can correct cancers that are the result of such changes.
Even more interesting is the role this process has in an Atavism and so-called "Junk DNA". Unused genetic traits don't simple "evolve away", they remain encoded - moved aside. The epigenome retains all of this information and can draw on it when circumstances require it. People may think of an Atavism as little more than an "evolutionary throwback", but if a trait helps the species survive it is moving forward.
The anthropological record fully supports this interpretation. Evolutionary scientists who use the mutation approach will tell us that it is the result of many tiny changes over a long period of time, but the Anthropological record shows that a given species will go mostly unchanged for sometimes hundreds of thousands of years and then in the span of a relatively shorter period of time coinciding with a dramatic environmental change the biology will change just as dramatically. This very observation is used by anti-evolution theorists to support their argument, which wouldn't be possible if scientists would be quicker to embrace new knowledge instead of holding onto outdated models.
This altogether is why humans continue to adapt to a changing set of conditions. Sickle cell anemia is an adaptation to avoid malaria, but comes with it's own problem. I myself never had an Appendix to begin with which is a great adaptation to the American diet which can lead to it being damaged, but as a consequence I don't have it as a safe house for beneficial bacteria and cannot as easily digest nuts and grains. I still have the genes for an Appendix, but those genes are turned off. I am "evolved" in the sense that I am adapted to a circumstance in the environment. My point is that you cannot fully understand evolutionary science or accurately explain it without including all of the relevant science.
I wish people like you would make use of new knowledge.
my brain hurts :[
If you can't explain it simply ,you don't understand it well enough.
Thanks for this!
It's actually extremely simple. Just read it. @@Velts125
Content Warning: This video makes you think of your parents having sex.
Heres a question, Why did you leave Top Gear?
+Nailman X ChuchuPLS Because Jeremy Clarkson left, and the trinity is broken. There's no way they are going to carry on without the complete trio.
The most interesting episode yet!!!
Asking a question is not ignorance, quite often it leads to learning. Criticizing stupid questions creates ignorance because it leads to the fear of asking.
I agree with you. Saying it this way is misleading at best. Even if he would be talking about white British adults, the number would be 95.3% according to "Prevalence of lactase deficiency in British adults". Talking about "us" as in "the world population" it seems to be even farther off. Wikipedia says about 25% of humans are lactose-tolerant.
Correct, that's sometimes referred to as descent with medication. A much more compelling example would be to separate the litter of pups into two groups that never intermingle and over the course of many generations observe that the two groups look and act differently, despite the fact that they shared a common ancestor. Eventually, you'd have a situation like donkeys and mules, which can't produce fertile offspring, but are closely related and share a common ancestor.
I would much rather enjoy my life to be narrated by you, Mr. May, than Morgan Freeman. Soothing, well articulated and intelligent sentences make me feel all warm inside.
Here's my question:
As the human population is increasing at a rapid rate, we exhaust all natural resources. So, at some point commuting and logistics might end up being so expensive, that motor transport will become too costly.
What is the energy source of the future? Solar, Hydrogen? Also, elaborate on hydrogen electrolysis.
This is like asking if the gradient between red and blue is complete when you have thousands of colors, it's almost impossible to complete because there isn't any real discernible moment where red becomes blue.
I think you should do a video on what effects space travel has on the human body, and how living on Mars would affect a human growing up there
Very interesting. Thank you!
James, You are the MAN! Easily my favourite T.V personality. I also love how you owned Gordon Ramsay on the F word lol. That was too good.
Could you do an episode on Quantum Physics, specifically the Uncertainty Principle? Love ya James
Thank you for making that very important point : )
The best example of this is how now we can learn calculus or electronics since high school. And just the genius by the time it was invented understood it.
thanks that clears a lot.
I have some questions: how do unconditioned reflexes work? how are animal instincts transmitted through generations? why do we cry? were ninjas really able to run on water?
Surely, by definition, evolution can never be complete, in the same sense that perfection can never be fully achieved
James, You focused mostly on physical evolution, have you put much thought into the internet, social media, databases, communications. Individually we may not be evolving but as a society we are, one might consider the internet & its traffic a sort of hive mind. 'I don't need to have a big amazing brain, just access to everyone elses'
Thanks,
Daniel
i agree i believe we're still evolving. i like how you included different point of views though
What?! Thats crazy! I've always thought about this. I have to taking chemistry next semester, and now I can't wait. Thank you so much for replying.
I love the part with the primitive dude with a rock axe and the old-days smart gentleman. XDDD when the other throws the hammer... LOL!
I suppose you are right in that respect, I certainly hadn't looked at it from that point of view before. You defiantly have some interesting points that are worth investigating however, and have peaked my interest. It seems I have some research to keep myself busy with for the time being.
May, can you make a video about computation, turing machines and the limits of modern computers (that sad "not everything is computable" thing), and here's the tricky part: Do you think that sometime down the line we'll have different kinds of computers capable of doing what integrated circuits cannot do? Things like bio computation will handle what our silicon chips can't compute? Non linear/heuristic stuff... Brain simulation?
Thanks for the videos, you're awesome!
Greetings from SP, Brazil
This is fascinating to think about
It's really simple! It can float due to density and buoyancy. Boats displace the equivalent amount of water when they press down on the body of water, which meanwhile pushes up and keeps the boat afloat. This is why the bottoms of ships are hollow. Anything that is less dense than water can float.
i just find the fact that animals CAN evolve is fascinating
We need only look at the last 500 years of our world. 500 years ago, the average hight of a person was, say 4.5 ft, now it's about 6 ft... thats a simple easy way of seeing, whilst we're still human, we ARE changing. No we might not be growing extra limbs, but we're growing bigger. Simple, evolution is constant, never ending.
You know why I can't except evolution as fact? Because of how 'perfect' everything turned out. I mean, not absolute perfection, but just how organized the earth is, and how organized he universe is. Think of all the mathematical laws which govern everything; I always thought that the concept of undirected events = chaos and directed events = organization was being overlooked when it came to evolution.
Why are some people taller than others? Of all the common characteristics we share as humans, how come height is one of the most distinguishable? Why does it vary even with siblings. And more importantly why do the bones grow vertically or length wise, and why not width wise too?
We're certainly taller than we were. Looking at old houses (1700s), the doorways were tiny.
Hey James,
In the London postcodes, why is there not a NE postcode?
Evolution is never complete. Even if your body isn't changing on the macroscopic level, the cells themselves will figure ways to maximize efficiency in a world where the environment is increasingly dynamic.
Also, evolution isn't restricted to biology. The current challenge is how efficiently we are maintaining our collective well-being on this planet, and our ability to survive in years to come.
Question - Are colors the same for everyone? For example is my blue the same as your blue? Is it possible to even know this?
I want to smoke weed with you 😂
Mr. May, a question if I may: What makes one scent more pleasant than another?
Well the only interesting thing I have to add is... My daughter is half black and half white and is one of the a smartest children in her grade. She is a tag student and has always been really advanced. Most of the children she is in school with are white or not mixed race. She was the only tag student in her grade for the last two years. Now there are other tag students in her grade. Also she was the only 4th grader in the Geo bee (like a spelling bee but with Geography.) I have to say I am a proud mama. She is also very beautiful and one of my best friends. She is fun, funny and a good kid most of the time! I would and will protect her with my life!!!😉
Very good. Evolution is fascinating.
Yami, the evolution for giraffe's are already pretty well documented. We do know the genes and the fitness would involve several things, access to more food/resources and (I think more significantly) the ability to see farther, to be more aware of predators and competition.
Over a long period of time yes, but the heat is not the main problem. The real situation is that the rise in temperature would cause large amounts of ice to melt, and the ocean levels to rise significantly and therefore rise above land close to sea level.
We would adapt to the heat rather than evolve, just as you adapt to the heat if you go and live in a warmer country.
Awesome vid
This is one of my favorite channels so thank you very much. My question is : why ants carry large objects that may be four or five of their size ?!!!!!!
Brilliant. Thank you.
We would only lose them if they presented a negative to our survival. If they are positive or neutral they won't go away.
I can answer that for you (learned in 7th and 8th grade): Yes. Light can carry energy. Or if you mean electricity: yes, every morning you put your electric toothbrush into its stand, it's happening. And then there are plenty of other wireless forms: microwaves, radiowaves.. see tesla.
Because intelligence is not a necessity for survival.
The only reason humans evolved such a massive intelligence in the first place was to improve our chances of survival with lack of any other means.
We aren't especially fast or strong but we were intelligent so, taking the path of less resistance, we started getting smarter to cope with a world where pretty much everything can kill us.
Other animals didn't need to because they had other means of survival independent of intelligence.
Hello Head Squeeze! I am from Mexico and hence my question: Is there any reason to believe that societies who live in significantly harsher gepgraphic and climatic conditions (I am thinking of northern Europe for example) will work more efficiently and be more prosperous as opposed to those living in places where the climate is good an resources are widely available? I hope that my Q. Turns out to be interesting, oh and I would also like a t-shirt! Thanks!
You can't understand a simple relative term yet you think you understand the science behind one of the most well supported answer in science that you can disprove it.
i didn't know that thanks for teaching me something new
That's an example of an environmental pressure. What happens is that gradually those within the populations that developed a random mutation which counters this environmental pressure are able to out compete those that do not (in terms of survival and reproduction). There are neutral random mutations all the time, sometimes by accident these turn out to be beneficial for survival. This is also why most species that have ever lived go extinct, they weren't lucky enough to have the right genes.
Hey, James May, I have a question: How much energy (or what measures) would it take to stop earth from rotating?
You vids are cool James
It's what we call the 'Reward System'; the release of dopamine upon consumption of the things you listed causes us to enjoy it. In the case of things like drugs and alcohol, the physical and mental 'highness' are sought for again by the brain, resulting in more needing consumption, then dependence, and finally, addiction.
the animations in these clips crack me up
We are evolving, but we’ll never know the outcome until someone a million years from now tells someone the history of which we are living.
We can not see into the future.
I have a question here. Why is it we can taste things by smell sometimes, and how come an apple, potato, and onion are supposed to taste the same if you eat it with your nose plugged. Lastly why is it sent can make you feel nostalgic. Like bringing back a childhood feeling even if you can't remember exactly what that memory was.
P.S. I'm a size small maybe medium, (102lbs 5'4") please send me a T-Shirt!!
This is something i've been pondering about for a while but never really got into the details. Because of the way a cat lands, we understand that a cat could die from a fall of the 2nd story of a building however survive 3rd as they have enough time to prepare them selves for landing, by this time the cat is traveling at terminal velocity; does this mean if you drop a cat from the each of the earth atmosphere, it would survive? then again, what is the highest a cat could be... and still survive?
Hello James could you tell me if Language is necessary to Think?
About the wisdom teeth:
It’s not that people are being born without them (well technically they are but you know what I mean.) The basics are that people no longer hold their bodily or tongue posture correctly anymore which is actually vital for proper facial development.
If you don’t breath through the nose, the jaw and face become elongated instead of wide, hence a lot of overcrowding, as the adequate room for teeth simply hasn’t been developed, because the forces which develop it, from the cheeks, tongue lips whilst resting and swallowing, weren’t present.
This means that the jaw is too small, and therefore there simply isn’t space for the wisdom teeth to erupt. It’s not that they’ve been deleted from our genetic code or anything like that.
Also diet effects this, as we used to have a very hard, low calorie diet and now it’s a very soft, calorie dense diet. Our jaws/face aren’t doing nearly as much work as they used to.
Look at a skull from 12,000 plus years ago. They all have perfect teeth, and perfect cheekbones which project forward. Instead of shallow like most people of today. That’s because it was before farming was utilised and we still had our facial/bodily functions operating correctly and at full capacity.
It’s the same as how people’s bones are no longer bowed from muscle stress like is common to see from ancient bones. We’re simply not doing the same work we were, which we’re supposed to do to grow properly, and therefore we are not growing properly.
I'm very interested about archaeology and ancient things including evolution, can you a video about an ancient interest?
Lol! I have no wisdom teeth and when I asked my dentist why he said he same: "it's evolution, mate! No more eating of roots or raw meat. You're mutated."
It was so cool. It felt as if I were Wolverine.
It's amazing how humans have spent hundreds of thousands of years trying to survive, learning how to hunt, trap or gather. But now that we have supermarkets and homes, we've pretty much forgotten it all. Why didn't the survival skills of the last 500,000 years get passed down through evolution?
I've got a question, Why do we worry and what's going on inside our body when we worry?
The astronomers monitor a star's brightness with the Hubble telescope, what they look for is minor dimming in the star's brightness, which indicates that a planet is passing it nearby, by the magnitude of the dimming they can calculate the radius of the planet but not much more.
I have a question that a lot of people are asking right now James: How will the radiation from the 2011 japanese tsunami affect the world ?
they also didn't have the population we do. with the size of our population, we can have more people working toward a common goal, producing results much faster, unless they call themselves a think tank, in which case nothing will ever be done.
Yes, it is about classifying species based on similarities in their characteristics. In this case, the homologene is a tool for comparing the genetic similarities according to any sequence (almost any) type.
And even the tool demonstrates that the molecular biological evidence supports our models of evolution, as do the fossil records, the chronologies and the general morphologies.
None of the evidence refutes the model -- and that should be easy to do, if the model was wrong.
QUESTION: Why do dowsing rods work? They kind of blow my mind. I would love to know the HOW behind them.
No. Sound is pressure waves in air (or any other medium) that we detect though a stretched drum, small bones and nerves in our ears. Light is carried by photons, which are fundamental particles acting themselves like waves. Our eyes detect these photons through lenses, light sensitive cells and nerves in our eyes. While some aspects of sound and light are similar (or analogous), they are very different phenomena and can't be detected with the same instruments like eyes or ears.
If they eat a species similar to themselves (closely related from an evolutionary point of view) that would be true yet. :) Also, we can indeed eat raw meat, It just heightens the chance of infection, so when we started frying our meat it made it easier to digest, ergo easier for our bodies to utilize, lowered the risk of infection, effectively heightening the chance of survival, and it gave the evolution of humans a boost. So I wouldn't assume that other carnivores don't get infections either.
Evolution will never be complete because we live in an ever changing and chaotic universe ! ,therefore we constantly need to adapt . The longer we are around as a species the more genetic material there is to choose from. This makes us more likely to survive any changes. As a species we need as many different ethnicities , religions sizes ,shapes and abilities all mixed together to ensure our survival ....!
I'm with PZ Meyers on this one. You can the conclusion right, but the reasons wrong.
James May, will we ever be able to replicate perpetual motion, or anything close to it (for example, something that would run for years without needing a refill of some kind)? My friend in my class is always planning a plan for a machine for perpetual motion, mostly including magnets, and whenever he presents his idea, our physics teacher explains why it won't work.
Actually, giraffes only eat from bushes. They have long necks, so they can look farther. they can warn other giraffes, keep watch over offspring, and detect predators :)
That was a very interesting question.
Finally a video that doesn't get evolution wrong. My only criticism is that the way he explains the bit about wisdom teeth implies that we've lost them *because* we no longer eat the same things and so we just got rid of them, but it's actually occurred naturally and just *isn't important* because we no longer eat the same things, so there's no reason a person without wisdom teeth shouldn't survive.
Right, that argument about that "diet of Chinese takaways and pizzas" is just nonsense.
Robert Medd wisdom teeth cant melt steel beams
+crazyviolent69, your point being?
Robert Medd yes
James, can you explain to us your pre-flight checks please?
Captain Slow on RUclips! That's awesome!
I JUST REALIZED THIS GUY IS JAMES MAY FROM TOPGEAR. AFTER LIKE 4 MONTHS OF WATCHING THIS AND 2 YEARS OF TOPGEAR. FML
Well, I have a question: In case we find an intelligent alien life form, how would we talk to them? More specificly, in what language could we have a conversation? And what would we tell them?
Is it better to have all the answers or all the questions? A day at the park.