Do NOT Buy Gray Zone Warfare (for now)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- watch me empty 3 Ak47 mags into this one guy.
Tiktok: / nanoytgaming
2nd channel (extra clips and streams): / nanoinanutshell
My hardware(affiliate): www.amazon.com...
Discord: / discord
Twitter: / nanoytgaming
Instagram: / nanoytgaming
Merch: www.nanoytgamin...
#Nano
Hey guys! Been reading through the comments just wanna add a couple of things.
The "Left Alt" in this game is just steady aim, it doesn't actually zoom. Did I miss something?
In the video I also mentioned my Stutters and FPS did get better after playing for 10-20min. I also changed a couple of DLSS settings that seemed to have helped. That said, if I join a server it will still have MASSIVE stutters initially.
The TLDR is: Gunfights are a chore and not fun, enemies are very spongy and dumb, not much to see, technical issues.
I'm still hopeful it will be good one day, that day isn't today
Balls
ADS and HOLD left Alt should work
It's an early access alpha.
Tarkov was just as bad when it released.
Tarkov has had eight years to build on their game, and they basically ruined all that trust they had built up in the course of a week 😂
@@RandomPP1balls
Very well said
"You're going to run out of bullets before I run out of stabbing"
It's a classic "Nanoism"
Typical day in London
I want a morale patch with that :D
@@freakazoidas i would love that
@@Ptit_Biscuitz"oi ye' go'- license fo' stabbin?"
@@joshdoesntcare3939 I'm thinking you don't watch a great deal of content created by this particular RUclipsr?
They took advantage of the Tarkov debate and released the game (even if Early Access) ahead of time. Unfortunately, you can see this in every single aspect.
Nope, it has always been planned to release the day it did. Just so happened to be the same week tarkov committed self delete
@@sneakymilkman4203 really? all i found was a release date of "2024" ... a shadow drop is never a good idea
Yes its confirmed they planned to release last year in March. Obviously wasn't ready. They planned to release it on April 25th after the 1 week access to streamers, but decided to push it back a week. They have been wanting to push the game out into peoples hands for over a year now.
Its was mainly released due to crying Gamers because they found it invredible unfair that Streamers could play it earlier than they could
@@animespiegel for the longest time they talked about how they wanted to release it during the Q1 of 2024, if they could manage to make it stable enough.
so if anything, they have delayed for an entire month.
Devs: "GZW is about morality, and sometimes it's better not to fight each other."
Everyone: (Too busy shooting each other)
Yeah, they really need to have PvE only servers or heavy repercussions from killing other players.
@@Tuulos they have both of these things already
The videos of Gray zone feels like that typical commercials at 2Am that shows you "miracle" or "incredible" products working perfectly for the people whos using it in TV (RUclipsrs who got lucky with not having issues about trying the game, and putting in his videos, "This game is the next revolution of the Extraction FPS genre")
And then we have Nano, A normal person who decided to check out the product that he watched on TV just because it looked very interesting, and, after a couple of minutes, he realizes that the product was not that great as people was making it look (Nano is basically the 90% of the player base who got troubles entering into the game, and, it shows you how the game works in reality for much of us)
I've had less issues with this game than any other game out right now at launch. And only issue I get so far is an occasional stutter that lasts for 2-3 seconds when in a small area with 10 other players. Expectations of the brain-dead will kill this game before it gets out of early access
@@javolk01same. Haven’t had any issues, and my fps is fine. I don’t even have a good pc.
No head, no gear, lets go! (it took them so long to put a character reset in)
Game works great for me, this is pretty much what Tarkov has been trying to be for all these years but better in every way.
Let me guess, the ad on TV was from BigFryTV. Yeah... that turd and I go wayyyyyy back. I called him out for clickbait and that's the meltdown of someone I did respect but no longer do. See, like Nano, I saw the faults of this game and seeing some if not all of the same downsides as Tarkov decided against buying this. Tarkov is like an 8 year old still wearing diapers and pissing and shitting the bed. See BSG's meltdown and repeated meltdowns. Nano shares the same idea as many others, wait, give it a few more years in the cooker, then wait and see the result. 10/10 video Nano.
"The only somewhat reliable way I found to down enemies is to shoot 5.56 to the face"
reminds me of the line from Scary Movie 3
*Decapitates an alien*
"I found it! Without their heads they're powerless!"
But really tho its like youre fighting the T-1000, dudes are just absorbing bullets.
its becuase of how they have made the damage system work unless you bleed out or damage an organ you wont die no matter how many shots you take there is no hitpoints. you bullets are phyical and leave cavities which also can cause damage
@@archemides1517 From stuff I was hearing the system was bugged till a hot fix dealt with it
I blame all the painkillers I find. Ai are all junkies who dont feel pain.
Ive found the best way to drop them is HPBT. The hollow points leave insane cavities and drop enemies in 1 shot.
@@archemides1517 it doesn’t matter at some point between Bullet 5 and bullet 6 a stomach will take you down from pain alone
I didn't think Tanoa could be even less optimized.
🤣
kek, funniest thing is both Madfinger and BI are both Czech
"I did...I understood that reference."😆
arma 3 optimize mod plz
Theres a reason KOTH isn't on that map 😂 besides the fact its dlc
The reason the AI is so "tanky" is due to the health system and bullet cavities. bullets in grey zone actually cause cavities when hitting targets, and unless the bullet used penetrates deep enough to destroy vital organs on your target, they only lose blood. And the healthpool on blood is way to high, or bloodloss seems to be ridiculously low. So you can put mag after mag into an ais leg, but the moment a bullet comes close to their head they drop
Or you can just use the right ammo like M855 and one shot (sometimes 2) everything from the Thorax and up. 5.45 PP also one shots, and so does 7.62 PS
I think this is a rather cool concept. Just poorly executed...
Problem is they don't react to being shot, getting hit 3x with 7.62x39 will fuck you up no matter what, even if it's just flesh wounds. Enemies should at least have an incapacitated state, instead of just perfectly ok + dead.
@@CrabsJohnson they absolutely react to being shot. You even can see in this video how all AI litterally stop returning fire after getting hit once or twice and then miss completely when they return fire again
@Duck1en Yes but there's no animation state that shows that, so there's no feedback that's happening. Look at the NPCs from Stalker, they're also tanky but because they stumble and kneel when they get shot, it feels like you're doing a good amout of damage to them
If Nano has a 4090 and struggles with this game, my 2060 has no chance
I have a 2060 super and I’m getting around the same performance as nano. Shows it’s a big problem with the game rather than the hardware.
Granted my settings are probably way different than his lol
Use FSR and you'll be fine
Im rocking 100+ fps easy
Asjust settings as people have suggested and it plays fine for the most part.
@Garflog643 Are you sure? I'm still thinking in buying the game
20:15 game so broken it start to look like a horror game. "I don't have any gear" "The mini map is not updating anymore" "If you see someone, that's not me" Nano found his own dead body and the game end. Yup definitely horror experiences.
More like nightmare experience.
This is like if Tarkov and Squad had a failure of a baby
arna instead of squad
thats only because it incredibly early access wait a couple months and itll be good
@@Arsen-b7r yeah tarkov and arma fits better
If anything, it's an arma / ghost recon hybrid, with a pinch of tarkov inventory system. Its definitely struggling, especially with the servers, but that's hardly surprising with how many people tried playing it. This launch has been far, far better than tarkovs launch back in early 2017, yet fits a slower paced niche.
apple never falls far from the tree lol
13:20 should have been “welcome to the jungle. We’ve got lack of frames”
My very first experience with the game had me setting everything to low and turning on DLSS on performance. When I got on the chopper, my game stuttered so much and looked like a PowerPoint slideshow. Somehow, it desync-ed so bad my character was stuck on the seating animation even after the chopper dropped us off and my game returned to some stability.
I had to end the deployment and exit the game, losing all my stuff. Even if your PC can handle this game, there is no guarantee the servers will. After turning on FSR and Frame Generation, I was still met with pretty nasty rubber-banding on every server. If you choose to buy this game, be warned that you're buying the promise of a game, not the game itself.
Running on the very lowest of settings and FSR on with an RTX 2070, I was able to get an average of 50 FPS with frequent dips into the 10s and 20s. It's a shame that this game performs so poorly, especially since it's one of the releases I was most looking forward to. This game still has a lot of potential, but in its current state I would avoid purchasing it until they've let it cook for another 6 or 12 months.
Yea stop running gear from 10 YEARS AGO you idiot.
The lag the first time going in is caching and optimizing shaders
Dude you have a 2070 that card is so old .
Tried it on 1070, actually on medium settings I had approximately the same performance, the problem is not in hardware (mostly)
Stutters in the beginning and occasional lags included, but in average I was able to achieve 50-60 fps with FSR on Performance
For me this game gives potential, but I agree on that it's a promise of a game
You need minimum 3060 and above to play in my opinion. With my 4070ti and 7950x3d using the FSR native AA I'm getting a consistent 130-150 fps.
The stutters and lobby issues I can understand.. The fact the AI STILL DOESN'T DIE is INSANE.
I'mma sound dumb while saying this but the reason why is because soft-point rounds are the absolute worst in this game from my experience. M193 takes 3-5 shots, soft-point takes 10 most of the time. Also depends on where you hit them at!
You don't get M855 until mid-game, so...
You have to shoot vital organs to kill anything. Can’t hit arms and legs they’ll eat it. It’s a cool concept but it needs work.
I'm going to disagree with you. Not that soft point is ass because it is. But slugs, buckshot, sniper rounds, 7.62 fmg and 5.56 fmg all do nothing. In no video game should i put a slug round, followed by two buckshot, followed by two slug rounds Into a human and they not die. That would kill a rhino. @JoMiMi_h
@@fitzwitsi one shot npcs with slug rounds dunno whats going on with your npcs. Maybe they just bugged?
Maybe I've been lucky, but so far all the AI I've shot go down in 1-3 hits.
the stutter is caused by shader compilation which is actually quite cpu dependent, this happens anytime you venture into a new sector of the map but once you've been in that particular part of the map for awhile it will go away. im playing on a ryzen 7 3700x which is far from being the best cpu you can own, and a rtx 4070ti super, ive been playing for around 11 hours now and its been pretty smooth so far, stuttering in the beginning hours but after that it was pretty smooth with the only real frame drops being from looking through magnified scopes because the game uses picture in picture to render scope magnification.
💯👍🏻
Hoping the frame drops when ads will be addressed soon. As far as stutters and frame drops go this is the biggest issue I’m having other other than loading in new areas
In the beginning _hours?_
lmao everyone buying these early access games wondering why the game ain't complete
its like running from one PIMP to the other
"They are eating tofu and bamboo ?! why are we shooting them? They already live in hell" lmfao
Yeah it's a bit messed up right now, I'm having a good time with it when it's not stuttering like crazy lol
Same on my end
it looks like this game stutters more than a vibrator
stutters are only happening for me when the server craps out, swapping removes it. guessing some servers are decaying too fast.
just wait like 6 months until theyve fixed the issues and itll be good
@@GGuLost1 or just wait for an actual good game
The devs said it on their live event, The servers are maxed out thx to the big pressure of gamers testing the game, they will fix it and add more servers and hardware, its allot better today then yesterday for example.
@@caxopa600 it is a good game
5:35 yea, there absolutely is "focus zoom" and you trigger it by pressing alt. You're very welcome good sir!
You have to trigger it? Bruh
@@Losowy tbh its quite normal in many tactical fps games. First you go ADS down the sight with mouse2, then you press alt/shift to "focus zoom" and your player will hold his breath to make the gun sway less.
@@Losowy That is very common yes.
@@Losowy literally every game that has that feature... yea? Also, when you aim a gun in real life, do you just push your eyes out of your skull so you can see better? Lmfao
@@Undulatetrout92why yes i do
Select content creators exclaimed how the game was good but not ready, lots of bugs and lots to work on. MANY if not ALL of the content creators agreed that the game should have taken another 6 months to a year to at the very least give a open beta or early access to the public. Content creators were flooding devs with bug fixes and telling them what to fix and add and take out and because so many people were bitching and crying that only select people got to play, the devs gave in and made it public and thats why you see so many review bombing about things the devs ALREADY KNOW and ALREADY HAVE BEEN TOLD BY THE SELECT CONTENT CREATORS BEFORE EVEN BEING PUBLIC.
Finally someone saying it. The people in this comment section are so clueless it’s giving me a headache
They really should of kept it to select people
Big ass mistake
Now all the everyone expects this to be a finished product
They shouldn’t of released it yet
People don't even read the Early Access disclaimer.
Don't buy the game if you don't expect bugs and willing to report them to help the devs.
Giving in to crybabies is not an excuse to release a broken game
@@irokash420ITS IN EARLY ACCESS YOU FUCKING NONCE, STEAM EVEN WARNS YOU THAT IT’S IN EARLY ACCESS. ITS NOT GOING TO BE POLISHED AND IT’S GONNA BE FILLED WITH BUGS. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK FUCKING SKULL.
The tough enemies looks like server lag. Client side shooting and hit reactions but the net is dropping the hit RPCs.
Remember that this game is made by a game company that it's previous experience is in mobile, that released games like Dead Trigger, Shadowgun, and Unkilled. Even with new developers in their team, they still need the experience. It's pretty buggy and unoptimized at the moment but if they can get things right with their first major PC release later on it'll be great. if not.... Expect a dumpster fire.
Grey Zone comes out of nowhere with no previous fanfare, and suddenly every tactical youtuber is shilling it? Not trusting it for a second.
The frame rate is pretty good if you don't play the game
Man im playing it everyday and man everytime i hop in im having a blast
IMO if you have not finished the beginner towns quest line then you really have had the full experience of the game then yet, but yeah even with that said it needs some work still... is it terrible no there is def something there.
Wait the 4090 is doing that 😅 how should anyone under 4090 play that
Refunded after constant crashes, stutters and rubber banding and super janky controls. Kinda sucks that so many content creators are just pretending like this is the next best thing since sliced bread. No one has integrity anymore.
I think alot of what makes this game "good" is the potential, as of right now it's absolute dog shit
They arent "pretending." Its just that they have good enough computers to not deal with any of the issues you talk about.
@@GaboG3 Or they actually know how to change the graphics settings.
@Tuulos I think we are all non stop messing with graphics lol but a 4090 wouldn't hurt lol
Ground branch, zero hour, ready or not, six days to fallijuah, now grey zone. All case studies why early access milsim does not work.
I think the biggest issue with the AI "health" system is that there is no real reaction to any hit. Every shot, even if it doesn't kill, should have some visual effect on the AI. If I shoot someone in the chest but their armor manages to stop it, the AI should still be incapacitated to some manner. Either they fall over, pass out, or in some way lose ability to reliably fight back. The over reliance on the "hit an organ to kill" means leg shots, which would completely immobilize someone and possibly incapacitate them, do virtually nothing because there is no vital organ. Shots to the head that are not lethal should be concussive for the AI, temporarily taking them out of the fight to recover from a grazing round or fully knocking them out for a long time. Arms should drastically reduce the AI's capability to shoot, affecting aim, reload times, and its ability to interact with the environment such as climbing.
Tl;Dr
Each shot should have a realistic effect on the AI, not just "You didn't hit my heart/lungs/brain? Try again!"
This will drastically help the feel of combat, as you are able to reliably incapacitate AI or severely injure them with all kinds of ammunition without delivering the killing blow. AI just feel like bullet sponges because of their ability to shoot right back after their helmet stops a round from fully entering their skull.
I don't know about the way you want them to react because it would make AI too easy but id understand maybe a pause in their firing or maybe they have a flinch animation they're visibly stunned for a extremely short amount of time
@Cerberusfrosty I think making the AI actually smart in combat would help it being too easy, but that's a whole issue of it's own. Kinda seems as if the AI just side step and run around when they get shot or are shooting, which makes them really easy targets.
I like the less than lethal systems like missing critical hits but your argument stands especially from the perspective of the pain someone would have from getting hit in the rear end or something.
@@thekillerkreeper3046 they do react when you hit their arms or manage to nick a vital organ. One queue for a fatal shot is the AI screams out in pain and often stops shooting and tries to either self delete push you or retreat while firing. Also another thing most poeple haven't gone much out past the starter town out near the airport you actually meet some scary AI. Meanwhile tyhe starter town is mostly effectively gang memebers and not a cartel or similar. This is ignoring the brave few that have gone to ground zero where spicy things lay
Welcome to the jungle
We got rubbish frames (per second)
“Their kindna dumb”
**mean while in the black mesa**
“Their kindna dumb”
2:35
Just because you are a newbie with starter weapons/ammo, and you need to work on your aim... doesn't mean the game is bad. Its fun, granted it has server issues, for an early access game its decent. But beware your PC has to be pretty beefed/higher end to get the full enjoyment and performance out of it.
I've had some pvp in the bunker
so far, grenades are inconsistent and players can take one shot or 50 to die like the AI. The only way to take anything down is a 5.56 to the face so far. the game has potential, once they actually fix the issues and add content and balancing patches
Are there any guns in 7.62 nato or something?
@@clumsygarage1578 Yeah AKs they have US7.62. So far there is 2 platforms AK, AR. Also M700 and mosin with 2 shotguns.
Once you get to 855 bullets TTK drop to miliseconds.
@@Bush_Whacker99 AK doesn't use 7.62 NATO though.
@@Tuulos really? What round are they using ?
I've been playing it over the last few days and it has improved every day. Now the basic enemies will drop if you hit them in their chest. The higher tier enemies are still a little bullet spongy but not super bad. Performance has also been improving through the hotfixes.
I've not watched the full video yet but I swear to god I heard those gunshots somewhere else.
stock sounds, some guns use the same ones that Dying Light uses, and some other games but that's the only one im sure about, if im correct the shotgun uses the same ones that CSGO uses
@@Kafelel well obviously its stock sounds. thats what stock sounds are for lol. it costs alot of money to hire the correct people and to record your own original sounds. its just not worth it, especially for a game in early access
@@lewis0705 yeah i know that, i just pointed out they are stock sounds that big games use, that's why @analien4813 heard them somewhere
Its also the norm to have stock sounds in ea then do a audio pass once ea is more featured and stable
@@Kafelel No I swear to god the rifles sound like the M16 from rising storm 2.
Quick inaccuracy that i notices, your character would not hold the knife like that, with the tumb on the spine, you appear to have a standard issue USMC KA-BAR, the KA-BAR has a little cross guard that would make that grip quite uncomfortable instead you would have all your fingers wrapped around the handle
Best line ever in every review of a game in terms of frames per second: "Its not bad, unless you are moving" xD I cant....xD
This game reminds me so much of The Hunter: Call of the Wild. THE BULLETS WOULD DISAPPEAR IN MY QUARRY'S SKIN. It was HORRIFIC.
And you have these shills like BIG FRY getting angry at players having real grievances with this game.
he pushed PayDay 3 hard and look how that turned out
man can be bought and paid for and we have all seen that now
Brain dead comment. Go watch big fry’s videos about this game. He points out more grievances than nano does in this video. He was even upset that the devs used a clip of him talking positively about the game in the release trailer. So many clueless people in the comments lol. There’s a difference between being a shill for a company and genuinely seeing the potential they put out and being excited for the final product.
@@Duckmaniac he is a shill though and now we know he can be bought and paid
game is a mess and unacceptable but lets be real, mans showed his true colours and blindness when it comes to the big Buxxxx to the point he will sell us broken trash if the price is high enough
used to be a fan of the big man for basically 3 years but not anymore after that scumbaggery
Just love it when people don’t read up on the best graphics settings for their rig. ATM DLSS absolutely tanks the game and creates them jutters. Turn it to FSR and I’ve not had one jitter since. The only problem the game has at the moment in my opinion is losing stuff through crashes
It is an early release. I have no expectations. Will look at it again in 3 months
Idk the game has some issues, but I've had fewer issues than a lot of the game released last year, and the gameplay is fun . My fps has always been pretty steady besides when it loads a zone
"Master has given Dobby a Glock! Dobby is free!" That's quality humour.
Personally I like the game and I understand it’s in the beginning stages so I push past the frustrations. can’t wait to see it get better
It's a good day when Nano uploads a video, love his stuff
Devs said the c-clamp physics is the main memory drain so far.
So for everyone now, its still early excess, they even write about it in menu. You can started hating like always when its out completely and not early excess.
Back in 2010 we called this "vaporware"
its like 10% done they dropped it because of the tarkov drama
tOfU aNd bAmBoO...?!
Damn bro even I didn't struggle that much with gun fights and performance
This is still better than paying 250$ for an early access game
@@kronika1210 What, for GZW? Steam literally has it listed it as an early release and the devs have said it's in an ALPHA state???????
@@kronika1210 No they didn't....they called it Early Access
Still better than sticking my wet dick in a toaster...
Did you actually have something useful to say, or are you just feeding the algorithm?
you dont have to the same standard edtion of tarkov is much better than this. i feel like gzw devs rushed at this tarkov controversy , they should have waited a bit more to finish some more stuff.
Does BSG force you to buy 250$ edition?
The thing is you need to go for headshots always, only enemies without Kevlar vests take like 2/3 bullets to the body everyone else can take like 15 rounds without dying. But headshots pretty much always 1tap
Feels like a game that could be really good if they fix the bugs and add some small encampments in the jungle or smth
Well that's the entire point of early access?
I love they were complaining about high ping meanwhile here in South Africa ur lowest ping is 150 and that's on games that have good servers, like I'm happy with the US east servers
It's annoying to see so many people not grasping the simple fact that this game is early alpha, and the people who are buying early access is to test and help the devs develop the game. Yet here we are everyone is expecting a full 1.0 ready early access in an early alpha stage.
yep. i am liking it so far, and i have a 3070 and get an average over 80fps. they jsut need time to optimize and crap. And ALOT of people on the steam forums were begging them to release during the EFT drama....so some of these comments stating they released early to capitalize on that is silly and prove are childish most gamer's are.
I genuinely thought this game was a full release based on the comments.
@@chubbyninjagaming Yup. Getting mostly above 120 fps. More importantly they are actively listening and monitoring.
@@MrSamHideki Yeah its rather absurd to be fair...
"The Early Access version features an immersive tactical FPS sandbox as its alpha experience, signifying that all core features are included. " from their reddit early access roadmap post from 2 months ago.
@@kayagoksoy120 in 1440?
Game got released for BETA 3-4 days ago lololol.. and they have put out more hotfix patches than tarkov has in months
"It's not bad, unless you're moving."
Always a good sign that a game has been optimized. Not!
The gunsounds sound just like old Rising Storm 2 what the hell
What about the droid attack on the wookies?
The comments on this video and this video show things that i dont think they're aware they're showing. 😂😂😂
0:39 wtf took our boys name
Apart from obvious ea issues. issue, The later enemies your fighting are going spongy because thier wearing armor. Even basic armor you start off with, level 3a rated vest and helmet, can stop soft point and hollow point ammo, resulting in bruise damage only, that will go away on its own. I know this just from being on the receiving end of akm starter ammo.
Use fmj to deal with 3a, 556 m855 or 5.45 PP for level 3 and BP and m855a1 for level 3 plus rated armor.
"Master has given Dobby a Glock! Dobby is free!" Made me laugh
So u die for 1-3 bullets, and enemy AIs for 30+ rounds, cool. Fentanyl is real deal.
1:56 "please put me out of my misery!"
I'm sure it worked fine on their work machines with a local network.
Make no mistake - it has challenges but IT IS FUN! Arma 3 Milsim, Squad, HLL, Ready Or Not enjoyer here - this game is fucking fun - running through the jungle, shooting guns, flying choppers and doing missions
you fly choppers in Battlefield, here the game just loads during the chopper animation.
It looks good, just need to ACTUALLY WORK
Lmao, it's lacking substance... Fun for 2 weeks and then what? You can only do the same stuff for so long, with any game..
@@Invertmini1212 now look at your comment and look at Tarkovs gameplay, ive heard tons of people say they already have more fun (which is what counts) than in Tarkov
@@jan939"Tons of people" is how much, exactly? As in how many % of Tarkov community?
so many Tubers putting out videos that say its sooo goood yet COD u can kill someone faster Grey zone has a good idea but its firmly in the Arcade level of shooters atm... and definitely not worth the money ... cause unless you have the absolute top of the like few grand graphics card and cpu that "game" will burn your computer to the ground..
5:34 Maybe I'm a freak, but I like little to no "focus zoom" with ironsights and non-magnifying optics. I've lost count of the games where I've been annoyed by aggressive focus zoom. I've not once played a game and thought "I wish I was zoomed in more with their unmagnified gun". Like with RDR2 (I was playing it earlier lol), I'd love to play in the first person view, but they pretty much ruined it with heavily restricted fov and a focus zoom that is so harsh that it would mean Arthur/John would be holding the revolver hammer against their damn cheek.
In a game set in a modern world, you get past "I can't see anything" with...magnifying optics lol.
You need zoom focus because you are looking at a screen. Everything else is unrealistic. If you had a vr headset on, that's a different story.
The only thing i dont like about the game is the fact that i put an entire glock magazine into an ai with several being headshots and had to run away while he still shot at me
Also there is Additonal Zoom if u hold L ALT
At least it's not 250$
''tarkov killer'' the same way that other game was the ''cod killer '' who remembers that game now huh
Helldivers 2 being called "cod killer". Its pretty fuckin awesome and literally everyone knows about it. What you yappin about
What's the name of the game? I think I heard of it before
its not a tarkov killer the devs say it themselves
@@proximoparadox5669 helldivers 2 is not cod killer , dont even compare those games , you dont even have pvp in helldivers , while cod is 99% about pvp. by that logic clash of clans/candy crush is helldivers 2 killer.
@@hemendraravi4787 lmfao L take
the game is in need of some serious performance and balancing but it doesn't seem to have any issues that cant be fixed and indeed will be fixed. The biggest issue rn is definitely performance as anything under a 3060 is basically unplayable which limits the player base. I also think that the bots need to be more spread out but have better pathfinding in general which should make it less chaotic and risky going into towns
It's actually not a bad game for being 20% finished. It will grow into a real gem
Been having a BLAST this kid couldnt be more wrong
This game confused the hell out of me, at first it was giving me huge Arma 3 vibes making me think it was some new DLC then I thought it was some new Cod Warzone update since it's called "Zone Warfare"
I've only had a fraction of the issues you have. I have 80-120 FPS (first heli flight is still laggy though), unless the server is dying my hits register usually and I kill NPC's in 1-4 shots depending on my aim (AKs have pretty bad dispersion btw compared to M4's). My biggest 'issue' has been unlucky and getting oneshot by 30% of my gunfights because of a head/heartshot. Not saying gameplay is smooth or not in need of work, but I definitely wouldn't say it's as big of an issue as people make it out to be.
I can't believe people are still saying the game runs fine
180 FPS to 200… not having any stuttering issues. Rather play this then garbage Tarkov where hackers are running the pvp side.
As @anabolicfreedom6005 shows, this game's community is just full of people BSing their experiences because they need to feel like they are sticking it to BSG/Tarkov.
The number of people in the Gray Zone community that actually tears down other people having issues just because they want to so badly hate Tarkov is crazy to me. BSG is a shitty company, but how in the world can you ever convince yourself that Gray Zone is a more playable or better product in any way right now? If Tarkov had any of the same issues Gray Zone did it would be treated so much more harshly.
Performance is one of the biggest complaints levied against Tarkov since the beginning. And still a very vocal issue everyone brings up. And Tarkov is no where nearly as badly optimized as Gray Zone. I was able to run a mid level 9th gen intel processor (4 core) with a 980 just fine on every map except Streets and one part of Lighthouse. I can't even run it with a much newer 8 core processor and 3080 ti. You have to be fucking kidding me if anyone in the community tries to convince me it runs fine.
Who the hell is getting 200 fps and how? I'm not running the best system you can buy, but its still an upper end system by anyone's metric. More than 50% of users on Steam don't even use a GPU made in the last 2 generations. Of people that even do the most popular card is a base 3060. A 3080 ti would put you easily in the top 5% of gamers by GPU power. Just having any 8 core processor automatically puts well above the average.
The game is so badly unoptimized that realistically almost no one can play it. And that's just one of many issues with the game. There have been reports of people having their character force reset/wiped after server crashes. People losing mission progress. Or hell just being stuck in base because the only way out is through helicopter. The game is a fucking wreck and people will close their eyes and ears to it all just because they want to actively hate Tarkov more? What the hell.
@xprodigyxgamer goes to show that you didn't take 5 minutes to optimize your game, or maybe the PC you own is ass, who knows who cares. I pull 150 frames easily cause I took the time to go through shit, but patience and reading are a virtue nowadays. Also they patched most of the reports but I guess that's why it's a pre-alpha, how is that so hard for people to understand. And bruh wdym there's no way out, fucking run if you have to, oh no you have to wait a couple minutes while playing a video game.
You have to optimize your settings to get the good performance.
I have a 4070ti 32gb ram 7950x3d and I'm getting consistent 150 fps.
AA settings to FSR set to Native AA boosted my performance.
Only issue is bullet sponge AI with aim hacks and not being able to interact to perform medical on a downed squad mate.
this is buggy and dirty at some point (like AI) but that's a solid base to build a game. thats a game mode that i waited for a long time, got some hope from Ghost recon (but you never should thrust ubisoft).
i'll give the devs some times to fix the bugs, improve the shooting and the AI.( and optimise it)
If youre having trouble dropping enemies. Try using AP rounds or aiming for the head. Currently i think the game treats all AI as if theyre wearing body armor even if theyre not.
You can test this by firing buckshot or slug into an enemies chest and watch as it takes every shell in the mag to drop them even if theyre only wearing a rig. Because i assure you a 12ga slug from 2 meters would blow a hole straight through you damaging every organ along its path, so for enemies to tank that and only have bruising and blood loss makes me think the game thinks they have on armor all the time.
When i switched to AP rounds with 7.62, 5.45 and 5.56 i started dropping enemies with 1 shot to the head and between 2-5 shots even through armor. So long of course im shooting center mass or neck area, and not hitting their arms/legs
That said! The games servers are struggling right now and crash around once every 2 hours or less. BUT if the server crashes then you keep everything you had on you even if youre deployed out of base. Its only when you alone DC from the server due to an issue with your internet that you lose everything.
The performance issues are pretty annoying right now. enemies spawning inside walls but still able to shoot you, server crashes, rubber banding(not very much from my experience), stuttering for pretty much anyone on anything below a 3060 and anyone with a 3060 or better has to run the game on low to medium settings with dlss to get consistent frames.
Im running a 3060ti and get 45-65 fps on medium with dlss quality or around 90-105 frames on fsr with frame gen set to quality(but it does look more blurry, so smoother performance but blurry). So it desperately needs a very large optimization update.
All that said the game is not worth buying any of the special editions but it is still worth the $35 standard edition just to get accustomed to the game during its early days because the game still has some pretty decent gameplay(i say this as someone that dropped $100 on the supporter edition).
I agree with the sentiment that it's better to wait, but for those who want to support the devs to get this where it can be then the purchase makes more sense. The smart consumer will wait till the game is in a less jank state. I think it shows potential, but needs a lot of work to get to where it can be. There are some systems in this game that are good ideas but need tweaking, and there are some that need major work. Wait if you aren't interested in supporting the devs monetarily, buy it now if you are okay with the games current state but want to support it. The lovely thing about free will is that you can choose what to do with your own money.
the thing tarkov has going for it is that it has an actual video game attached to its weapon system
this doesn't
You guys better call this a scam and get it cancelled like you did with The Day Before. Don’t give them any time to fix it, just jump on the hate train.
Bet you're one of those dudes who made The Day Before 🤨
@@Wrd12 Bet you’re one of those dudes who shit on it because a streamer told you to.
Then tell me how that scam isn't a scam
They told something but delivered a different thing
-They called it MMO but now it's extraction shooter
-They said it's gonna have a deep vehicle mechanics and turns out it's not at all
-Massive zombie mobs? Nope
-They said that the game already been developed for 5 years? But turns out they started working on it for only 8 months before release
- and many many more
And don't you ever use that "No Man's Sky comeback" Card on me
It's different, NMS can make a great game but they just being rushed to release the game by sony. So it's different
Imagine saying that you made a game based on fake trailers and a couple of days later after people bought it, you just rugpulled it from the store thinking that you can run away with the money
Thank god in the name of Lord Gaben that he saw this kinda stuff centuries ago so he made a policy that every money that comes from game distribution will not be sent until the next month that said game been released, so you can't just rugpulled it like that lol 😂😂😂
tbh, amazing looking game (except the obviosu bugs, that can be fixed later) but the bloodloss health pool needs to be toned down a bit. I love the damage system and it kinda reminds me of War Thunder but 'minor' bullet wounds do NOT get rid of enough blood from the AIs health pool as they would IRL.
It takes longer to kill because he was shooting the legs, the health system is different from Tarkov where u can kill enemies on the legs, Gray Zone has this blood mechanic so u can keep shooting their legs will only make them bleed faster but only die/comma when blood levels are low. You have to shoot at head/chest area for the vital organs
I can see where everyone is coming from with the connection issues and stutters and all the janky stuff but this game has a lot of potential for the future and I know someone's gonna say but it should be good on release and I get that but I wanted to enjoy an experience like this for a long time since tarkov is somewhat non beginner friendly (also you'd have to pay 150 for pay to win add- ons) while for GZ its just 35 with most of the same gameplay loops and experiences and also its not like tarkov didn't have a incredibly shaky start as well and I'm mostly comparing it to tarkov since it is a direct competitor. I believe that if they had not released in a hurry because of the EOD stuff then the experience might have been so much better I hate that the most when companies rush a master piece. Its just I may have a couple stutters and crashes every 3-4 hours of playing but I have had a lot of fun a long with it and I will say if you think tarkov is a little confusing or hard this game in the future might be your solution. I hope all of my issues are resolved in the future and npc's and players if you shoot them in the head they pretty much insta die I know this isnt a great solution for the absolute meat shields that the AI are but it is one solution.
You hsould go back and see what tarkov was like in its earliest access.
And it was like 10 years ago with really old technology. What is your point? They release something like this today and get away with it?
People be complaining that an early access game isn't finished and has alot of problems, like what are you expecting
A playable build that show how fun the game can be. So far missing everything in that sentence.
800 views in 3 minutes?
Nano you falling off. Gotta do more resident evil content.
Am i the only one that hears PUBG gun sounds? Like these weapons sounds seem super similar
Man the graphics are crazy, that dude says that on the jungle you cant find anything interesting but its a combat sim, in the real Life you dont gotta find ammo breakin trees
But if theres no enemys in the jungle, whats the point? Its just decoration and this game will be dead 3 months after release.
It's true the only places worth going is lz towns
What do you expect from an Open World extraction shooter? Even in tarkov the forests are mostly empty with some SCAV or PMC running around, and those are smaller maps in comparison, in a bigger map is going to be harder to find enemies in zones where is not probable for people to go through like for example, the jungle@@advanceddarkness3
I love when consumers getting owned
Just an alpha version where players pay to be testers. 😡
Wake up honey, new Nano video about the new Tacticool slop game NO.346
So tired of royal games.
Jungle maps are easier to design as there's tool to randomize a large map.
High-setting you can hardly see anybody.
All the try-hard will just turn the setting to low.
Dr.Disrespect react correctly to this game by sleeping through it lol.