Pro wildlife photographer @wildmanrouse tests the new OM-1 Mark II showing it's amazing AF

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 июл 2024
  • So here is my field review of the new OM System OM-1 Mark II. I have had this camera for a month and have put it through it's paces. I do not care for politics or armchair photographers. I tested this camera as part of my professional life, where my images are the difference between a Barry Gibb style wig or my current "follicly challenged" status!!! If you want an assassination job then don't read this, if you don't use OM then don't bother either, this review is for OM System photographers out there who are genuinely interested in what this camera does.
    If you want to see a more personal review, with more pics, plus my usual exclusive content of inspiring videos, image critiques and more tiger fun then check out my patreon and take a free 7 day trial of the combi membership - www.patreon.com/wildmanrouse
    I will happily answer polite questions so feel free to stick then in the comments, rudeness just gets you deleted, let's all be decent to each other as life is too short. Be an idiot you will last a few seconds, be decent and I will try to help to the limit of my knowledge!!!
    Links you might like.....
    Our patreon channel is the goto place for in-depth photography hints and tips from a pro you can trust, videos, travel, amazing pics, podcasts you name it we have it, start your free trial here today www.patreon.com/wildmanrouse
    Check out linktr.ee/wildmanrouse for my Tiger Tours, UK workshops, WildBunch, OM-1 Field Training Guide plus other great stuff .
    Check out bit.ly/3fnTGTq for my online wildlife photography training course
    For Flexshooter tripod heads please visit - www.flexshooter.co.uk
    This is my Amazon Store Front for all kinds of cool photo stuff - www.amazon.co.uk/shop/wildman...
    Don't forget to subscribe to this page and signup to my website newsletter for early news as my trips tend to book out quickly.

Комментарии • 84

  • @paulbarrow9925
    @paulbarrow9925 5 месяцев назад +1

    That looks cool Andy. Some great improvements there. Have decided to order one and hope it is with me for April.

  • @wilsonchee5834
    @wilsonchee5834 5 месяцев назад +1

    When you use the monopod to hang it down the side of the jeep, how do you AF and activate the shutter?

  • @macg33zr
    @macg33zr 5 месяцев назад +4

    Thanks Andy. A good review of the new camera, I enjoyed this while slurping my breakfast cuppa. Your video has provided a lot of info for questions buzzing about my head on this update, it looks to be a good update of the OM-1

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +2

      Breakfast cuppa I am jealous. I am on Keto this week so fasting until 12 with black coffee only! It's a good update. My Patreon channel provides a lot more and I've been answering question on there this morning you should check it out as it's a good site - Patreon.com/wildmanrouse

    • @formermpc10
      @formermpc10 4 месяца назад +1

      It's not a review It's advertisement.

  • @tonydelphi4961
    @tonydelphi4961 5 месяцев назад +1

    Great! I'd buy one.😊

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +1

      You and me both! I ordered two.

  • @skipsaunders5974
    @skipsaunders5974 3 месяца назад +1

    did you use the digital 2x tele on this trip?

  • @perfjordvang1685
    @perfjordvang1685 3 месяца назад

    Bird detecion is great, but what subject detection do you use for lions, elephants, bears, moose and other wildlife? Can you use the one for cats and dogs?

  • @johnhume3932
    @johnhume3932 5 месяцев назад +1

    Great introduction to the new camera, but I really want to know how good it is at locking onto flying insects, especially dragonflies.

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +2

      Not my interest John as you will know and I will try it in May locally here. Hopefully one of the macro gods will test this as I certainly am not that

  • @JoeMaranophotography
    @JoeMaranophotography 5 месяцев назад +1

    As an original Lumix G9 user I'm so jealous of all these new autofocus improvements as its been the bane of my camera even since it came out lol

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +3

      Lumix make great cameras too. I can only focus on the OM stuff as it's all I know. Be proud of what you have and use it to the best of your ability, if you decide you need a change then you know where to go!

    • @JoeMaranophotography
      @JoeMaranophotography 5 месяцев назад

      @Wildmanrouse 100% the only real way it holds me back is the autofocus because you have to constantly chop and change settings to stand a chance and even then it's maybe 60% reliable if that for birds and fast moving subjects. Advanced animal AF from either Panasonic or Olympus would be fabulous and that 150-600 seems like a dream too!

    • @sue.Hoo123
      @sue.Hoo123 5 месяцев назад

      @@JoeMaranophotographybuy the G9ii it’s a game changer 👍

    • @JoeMaranophotography
      @JoeMaranophotography 5 месяцев назад

      @@sue.Hoo123 Money is money lol

    • @davehenson5390
      @davehenson5390 5 месяцев назад

      If tis any help, a mate has bought the G9ii (from the G9) and says the new AF is greatly improved.

  • @xiaofengliu5724
    @xiaofengliu5724 5 месяцев назад +2

    Thank you very much! Will OM -1 get the same autofocus?

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +2

      Pleasure. As I understand it There are currently no plans to do so.The OM-1 Mark II has increased internal memory and new optimized memory controls compared to the OM-1. As a result, it is not possible for the new features like Live GND and human subject detection to become available via a firmware upgrade to the OM-1. That's as I understand it but it's not really something I deal with as I'm just a lowly pro photographer

    • @HokKan
      @HokKan 5 месяцев назад +1

      Fewer people will buy the new camera if existing users can just upgrade the firmware to get the same AF performance.

    • @erwin2912
      @erwin2912 5 месяцев назад +1

      Fewer people will by an OM camera if firmware isn't continually improved. Human AF detection is a must for an expensive camera@@HokKan

    • @HokKan
      @HokKan 5 месяцев назад

      @@erwin2912 I doubt it. Sony is doing pretty well. If the camera is good, people will buy it.

  • @meshackgaolathe6492
    @meshackgaolathe6492 5 месяцев назад +1

    Are there any improvements in the dynamic range at all

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад

      I don't think so although I understand hires shot can now save 14 but which should give the same effect. Not my area of expertise though so sorry could not be more help. Thanks for asking decently shame a lot can't.

  • @narinthip3058
    @narinthip3058 5 месяцев назад +1

    Super review Andy and all jaw dropping images to boot. I definitely will upgrade but will wait a bit as I don't do this for a living. Also, I do have two OM-1 so my upgrade costs will be a bit more. But OM-1.1 is already more than a camera for my skills. I can wait. One thing about video AF, how does it do for flying birds in case you have tested it?

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +1

      OMG!!! I am shocked. You mean you actually looked at my images and didn't look for faults?? Wow what are you doing on here as you sound decent and normal. OMG I am shocked that you looked at my images!!! 😂😂😂😂 come and join us on Patreon, people are nice. I have 4 OM-1s so painful for me as I'm just an outsider.

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +1

      And sorry I have not tried flying birds with video but will this weekend. Updates only on Patreon now as I'm tired of the spanners.

    • @narinthip3058
      @narinthip3058 5 месяцев назад

      Andy, I was one of the original Wildbunch member, mate. I just got really busy and couldn't really participate as much. When you have this new platform, I have yet had time to get into it. But alway miss you and the gang! Cheers, Narin

    • @narinthip3058
      @narinthip3058 5 месяцев назад

      Look forward to see those inputs Mate, video AF. Not sure if you are still oversea but wherever you are, best of luck!

  • @oppyoko
    @oppyoko 5 месяцев назад +2

    1 MK2

  • @nikaberzina2478
    @nikaberzina2478 5 месяцев назад +1

    Why haven't they given us what we want from the start, in OM-1 ? Are we pursuaded to throw that camera away now and buy mk2 ? or maybe OM1 is elegible for firmware update ?

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +1

      Did you actually watch and listen to the video. I mean listen to what I had to say from 25 years of pro experiences?

    • @nikaberzina2478
      @nikaberzina2478 5 месяцев назад

      @@Wildmanrouse Sry, I didn't, I am too impulsive.

    • @formermpc10
      @formermpc10 4 месяца назад +1

      Kind of grumpy for an influencer trying to sell OMD products!

  • @danieled.2583
    @danieled.2583 5 месяцев назад +3

    The updates were promised on the OM-1 but they saw fit to provide them on a new model and this is incorrect.

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад

      Nothing to do with me. I just use a camera in my professional life.

    • @vermis8344
      @vermis8344 5 месяцев назад +1

      Your OM-1 is completely useless now. You might as well hammer a lens into a big King Edward! Throw it out! Throw it out!

  • @jpdeardenphotography
    @jpdeardenphotography 5 месяцев назад +3

    Wow. Fantastic review.
    Stunning photo's and what a location. So jealous would love to go there but being wheelchair bound its a stuggle to get on a safari and cant afford the cost.
    . Im a wildlife shooter too and the AF improvements look really good. I have the OM-1 mk1 also and absolutely love it. Cant wait to test out the new canera an the 150-600 lens.

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +3

      Thanks so much and I used to talk to a wheelchair photography club in a college in Alton. It was so inspiring. So please continue to love wildlife and your photography.

    • @jpdeardenphotography
      @jpdeardenphotography 5 месяцев назад +3

      Thank you. Oh I will. Its my therapy. I was paralyzed in 2019 and struggled to come to terms with it and I suffer from severe depression and anxiety.
      So in the hipe to inspire others I started a youtube channel depicting my days in the life of...and reviews of OM SYSTEM samsung, Nikon and photo editing software. But my main is OMSYSTEM how being lightweight and compact is perfect for me . I do days out, mental health talk and disabled equipment. Looking forward to seeing more of your videos

    • @d-entrecasteaux
      @d-entrecasteaux 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@jpdeardenphotographyinspiring!

    • @jpdeardenphotography
      @jpdeardenphotography 5 месяцев назад

      Thank you

    • @michaelhall2709
      @michaelhall2709 4 месяца назад +2

      @@jpdeardenphotographyYou are an inspiration, sir. Be well.

  • @robertharrison9720
    @robertharrison9720 5 месяцев назад +3

    The OM-1 had a major issue with C-AF drifting in and out of focus on static birds when using single point focus, has the Mk2 resolved this?

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +1

      Explained in the video

    • @robertharrison9720
      @robertharrison9720 5 месяцев назад

      @@Wildmanrouse Must have missed it, what time position?

    • @RoderickJMacdonald
      @RoderickJMacdonald 5 месяцев назад

      @@robertharrison9720I think about 1:40. He does not use the word “continuous”, but he mentions tracking the subject behind grass, etc.

  • @mikeg5121
    @mikeg5121 5 месяцев назад +1

    Has the om1, not the mark 11, got the nd grad and nd filters in the menu .

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад

      It has everything in the menu because that's where you access them? Not sure what this question means sorry.

    • @mikeg5121
      @mikeg5121 5 месяцев назад

      @@Wildmanrouse it was about the nd grads, and the nd filters. I was not sure if the om1 has both, as the om1 mark 11 does.

  • @EugeneMaynard
    @EugeneMaynard 5 месяцев назад +1

    👍🏾 🙏🏾 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇸🇪🇹🇹

  • @erwin2912
    @erwin2912 5 месяцев назад +7

    Your pictures do not look sharp at all.. I own the OM-1, what's the reason for that?

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +2

      They are razor sharp as I'm a pro. This is a typical slate of my work. Happens always

    • @wilduntamedphotography1260
      @wilduntamedphotography1260 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@Wildmanrouse They indeed look very soft and not sharp, also on my screen. But one reason could also be that you're working with a full HD timeline, and not one in 4K. Therefore it also does not show your pictures in the highest possible quality. Apart from that, answering with "They are razor sharp I am a pro" is a bit arrogant. Not the way you should treat people .....

    • @vermis8344
      @vermis8344 5 месяцев назад

      ​@@wilduntamedphotography1260 If it comes down to a pro photographer with years of experience and hands on experience with the new camera, vs. keyboard warriors who are bitter that OM didn't put 40MP on a 17mm sensor, I know who I think is justified in a little arrogance.

    • @maziatr
      @maziatr 4 месяца назад +1

      ⁠@@wilduntamedphotography1260Andy has always been an arrogant character

    • @jarrahfitzgerald2752
      @jarrahfitzgerald2752 Месяц назад +2

      Agreed. Many of the images, as presented, are not sharp. It may be that the actual photos are sharp, but they have not been added to the video at a high enough resolution. "I'm a pro" is a very odd response.

  • @markwalker8374
    @markwalker8374 5 месяцев назад +1

    Your photos in this video look soft (esp the bee eater in flight) or at least low res and I am sure they are not. Is this a youtube thing ? i am viewing this at 1080p HD on my Macbook Pro.

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +1

      They aren't soft they are razor sharp. Im a pro and don't take soft images. All are uploaded at HD 1920. As usual someone says this to get at what I am taking about.

    • @markwalker8374
      @markwalker8374 5 месяцев назад +1

      I don't doubt that your photos are not sharp its just in the video on my laptop they appear soft or in HD. The OM-1 photos look ok and the video taken with the camera looks fine but the lion at 4.52, barbet 6.09 and bee eaters at 3.38 & 6.18 look soft whereas the elephant at 2.45 looks fine. I wondered if it was a RUclips settings or upload issue that made them appear soft. The photos in your high ISO video from 6 months ago by comparison all look ok.

    • @markwalker8374
      @markwalker8374 5 месяцев назад +1

      I have rewatched the video on my Huawei P30 Pro from 2018 and the photo of the bee eater in flight when I freeze the screen does look sharp comparing them side by side with the Macbook's retina screen (same RUclips setting). Strange how the resolution differs from device to device. Apologies and please ignore my comments

    • @robertharrison9720
      @robertharrison9720 5 месяцев назад +1

      "Im a pro and don't take soft images" - Nothing like a 'pro' with arrogance! What an idiot you are @@Wildmanrouse

    • @vermis8344
      @vermis8344 5 месяцев назад +1

      "Your photos look soft. I'm watching this at 1080p."
      😐

  • @d-entrecasteaux
    @d-entrecasteaux 5 месяцев назад

    Pity they didn’t improve the video features- like 4K 120p and stickier video 🦢 detect C-AF. Also, I never wished for a deeper buffer. Waiting for it to clear will mean missed shots like my G9mkii. Is C-AF better when birds fly toward the camera? This is what I’d like to know. Please post some specific real world, everyday, pro user samples proving how good the C-AF focus improvements are. Many thanks 😊

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад

      I showed plenty of pro user samples as I'm a pro. Therefore my images are pro and anything suggesting they are not is insulting!

    • @wilduntamedphotography1260
      @wilduntamedphotography1260 4 месяца назад +1

      @@Wildmanrouse The more you have to say that you're a pro, the less you are ..... 😉

    • @d-entrecasteaux
      @d-entrecasteaux 4 месяца назад +2

      @@Wildmanrouseno one is trying to insult you or ruffle your feathers. 😂
      Here’s the thing- you and I know the OM1 is brilliant with bird detect AF when the bird is flying across the frame but it’s not so good at holding onto the focus if the bird is flying directly toward the camera. This is particularly evident when using ProCapture at 50fps.
      The question is: is the MKii an improvement in this regard or not?
      Many thanks, and please don’t think I don’t respect your work. I wouldn’t ask you if I didn’t.

  • @Trigger-xw9gq
    @Trigger-xw9gq 5 месяцев назад +2

    "We don't need a new sensor". Nonsense. That they wouldn't bump the resolution is lame.

    • @davehenson5390
      @davehenson5390 5 месяцев назад +4

      The OM01 is equivalent to 75 MP on full frame. There is NO consumer camera with a higher pixel density so what is it you are wanting?

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +6

      We don't need a bump in resolution. Why do you want it? Do you use the camera? No I suspect not!!! Just get out and take good pictures rather than slating people that know better than you!!!

    • @Wildmanrouse
      @Wildmanrouse  5 месяцев назад +1

      Who knows Dave!

    • @Trigger-xw9gq
      @Trigger-xw9gq 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@davehenson5390 Equivalent to a 20 MP FF, 60 MP FF? Which one? After coming from the Sony A1, and now using the OM-1, the sensor is the biggest disappointment. Even a small bump to 24 MP would have been something, not to mention sticking with the same old SD cards instead of CFexpress on a camera that does 120 FPS is lame. They also didn't include GPS. C'mon.

    • @davehenson5390
      @davehenson5390 5 месяцев назад +2

      @@Trigger-xw9gq AsI said, if you are 'cropping heavily' then sensor size is irrelevant and it is the pixels on the bird that matter. And given that no camera has a higher pixel density than the OM1 then the 'cropping heavily' argument breaks down. What is it about the OM1 vs the A1 that disappoints you?