The Marshall sounds fuller. I own the charge 5 and find the projection to be very directional. How's the sound quality when walking around the speakers?
Comprate audifonos de calidad primero, se nota demasiado la diferencia, uno sonido hueco y muy pocos bajos y el otro un sonido brillante con bajos que retumba la cabeza.
The charge has higher only because it has all the speakers positioned in front. The Marshall has 2 in front 2 behind (it has a 360-degree sound). I much prefer the marshall 👍
@getula1 actually the marshal middleton's 3 inch woofers fire out of the sides. On the front and back are the passive radiators and tweeters. I was video showing the driver layout. Corner placement should really enhance bass.
The Middleton has more defined mids & highs. Overall better clarity. If your looking for a speaker that puts out a lot of bass, & gets relatively loud, then go with the JBL. If you listen to rock & or metal, AKA, music with a lot of guitar & drums, the Marshall is the way to go. Much cleaner & detailed mids & highs. It basically depends on the type, & or types of music that you listen to. It's all about " PREFERENCE."
![Marshall Emberton 2 VS Bose Soundlink Flex & JBL Flip 6 - [Sound Test]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AMcsxCgwiVU/mqdefault.jpg)
The Marshall has a nice rumbling bass
感覺 Marshall 還有一種帶有磁性的立體環繞聲。同樣的音量下，不是只有聲音大聲而已，
The Marshall has an EQ wish you would've played with it
I think the price of 150 euros for the JBL compared to 300 euros for the Marshall speaks for buying the JBL
The Marshall sounds fuller. I own the charge 5 and find the projection to be very directional. How's the sound quality when walking around the speakers?
The Charge 5 for me. The Middleton sounds like it's playing in a big bowl. Some might be impressed by that type of sonic signature. Not me.
Comprate audifonos de calidad primero, se nota demasiado la diferencia, uno sonido hueco y muy pocos bajos y el otro un sonido brillante con bajos que retumba la cabeza.
Its 360
93 DB on Charge!? Charge is little monster...
Una persona si grita a 100 db, no es lo mismo que una cantante de ópera que hace vibrar con su vizca los mismos 100 db.
Esa es lo que comparas.
Charge 5 is better soundwise and pricewise
🤣
Marshall is 360 vs directional
JBL is built for party animals. Marshall is built for grandfathers.
I hope you understand the what I mean.
Esto es calidad de sonido nada más, cero neurona.
1 30watts transducer on c5 vs 2 20 watts on middleton yet the jbl still sounds more balance also cheaper
😂mas equilibrado? Parece que estuvuera debtro de una lata de conserva al lado del middleton
jbl charge 5 over 70% volume bass is lower so Marshall Middleton wins.
Jbl charge 5 is the best
Why charge 5 bass sound dry?? Lol did you lower the bass on the eq 😂
No, the opposite. The bass is 10/10 on the EQ
I have the middleton and the bass rumbles!
Marshal 🔥🔥
Play something with real instruments....
I'm finding a good microphone to recording video. To increase our quality
Charge 5 sound better
Not even close. Marshall has a far more powerful deeper sound
The charge has higher only because it has all the speakers positioned in front. The Marshall has 2 in front 2 behind (it has a 360-degree sound). I much prefer the marshall 👍
@getula1 actually the marshal middleton's 3 inch woofers fire out of the sides. On the front and back are the passive radiators and tweeters. I was video showing the driver layout. Corner placement should really enhance bass.
Bass enhanced on the middleton?
The Middleton has more defined mids & highs. Overall better clarity. If your looking for a speaker that puts out a lot of bass, & gets relatively loud, then go with the JBL.
If you listen to rock & or metal, AKA, music with a lot of guitar & drums, the Marshall is the way to go. Much cleaner & detailed mids & highs.
It basically depends on the type, & or types of music that you listen to. It's all about " PREFERENCE."