Thanks for the video Mat! Again, I think December is a good time to add it. Also, yes the Derby was designed to be a long range, radar guided Python 4. Oh, and Delta V is simply theoretical range. The R77 has more Delta V than the AMRAAM, but to find actual range, you have to factor in the drag coefficient, and use an equation to calculate the actual range. In practice, even though the R77 has more Delta V, the AMRAAM has a significantly less amount of drag, which equals a further range. I don’t think the performance would be crazy game breaking, the close range performance is similar, arguably worse than the R73, and we have to make the jump in flare resistance eventually. We made that jump last year, and everyone has figured out how to flare these missiles, we’ll figure out how to flare this. Again, we already have the dogfight performance in the R73. As I’ve said, probably December
@@Thatrandomguy-fi6qz yes, stuff like the J11A would have a definite way of detecting an IR missile such as the Python 4, and I believe there are some other aircraft that can be upgraded to have a MAW system
@@WyattChilson incorrect, it can only has 50G, a 2000s missile. (The magic 2 was doing that back in 1986) and 10 miles is actually fucking nothing lol. The mica IR can do about 37 miles and And what do you mean locks the FOV to 1? Do you mean 1 degree? Because the R73 and magic 2 have .75 of a degree in game (though the magic 2 should be .43)
@@WyattChilson none of that is true. And The 9X block 2 just gave it data link.(in 2015 lmao) I literally have a document on my PC that states the 9X has only 50 Gs
Technically we already get the Python 4 with next update. I‘m talking about the Derby Missile. That’s technically an enlarged version of the Python 4 with an active Radar Seeker. I‘m honestly a bit concerned about the missiles we are getting. Toptier already is an absolute mess and it will only get worse with the introduction of active radar homing missiles. If Gaijin keeps this trend up we might get at some time to the point where they will introduce current gen missiles into the game and then it will only be who sees first will kill first. Imagine you would have to face the MBDA Meteor. A missile with at least the range of the AIM-54 but the difference that it can accelerate in its terminal phase while being more agile than the AMRAAM. Or the AIM-9X. I play DCS, also competitive and that Missile is banned on most PvP Servers for a good reason. There are also mods that introduced the Python 5 and that missile is absolute bonkers, because it can do a 180 and kill a target that flies behind you while being almost 100% immune to flares. The AIM-9M is already too much for my opinion.
With this new data, I really hope to see the modernized Kfir C.10/Block 60; an upgrade made for the Colombian Air Force with Python 4s and Derbys. With the current rank VIII premium jet being “Modernized” rank VII jets (F-20 and MiG-21 Bison) I expect this to be Israel’s premium rank VIII in the future
I believe it can hit 60-70 Gs when dual plane, but I don’t think that it forces dual plane turning, and I don’t think Gaijin even codes the extra pull, do we’re outta luck. Whatever, 50gs is still incredibly good
I think R74 is way too advanced. Like, you thought the P4’s flare resistance was too powerful, the R74 can literally be programmed to ignore NATO caliber flares. I think the R73 would still be very viable and hold its own against the P4, the Magic 2, I’ve heard has the dual IRCCM irl, but I can’t find any source proving it. They could add either a really late version of the Aim9M, like the 9M-8 or 9M-10, which I believe get a better seeker and have 40Gs of pull, or they could add a very early version of the 9X, because it has a much more advanced seeker like the R74. They could buff the AAM3 to be historically accurate, and that would hold its own, and I don’t know much about the IRIS T, but it was around the same timeframe so that would work. And before you guys yell at me that the R73 is way worse than the Python 4, the P4 was the irl counterpart to the R73, and it was a close matchup, if you don’t believe me that they’re a close matchup in game, search “R73 vs Python 4” on YT, you might have to specify WT.
@@batlax18that’s doesn’t make any sense. How do you program something to ignore flares based on who makes it? Maybe I’m dumb, but in the eye of a IR missile a flare is just a massive splotch of heat that hides the aircraft’s heat signature and distract the missile. How would the missile be able to discern what heat signature belongs to which nation.
@@spongegobler3449 Soviet and NATO flares have different characteristics. That's why aim-9x, which was optimized and tested on nato flares was fooled by old soviet flares on Su-22 in 2017
I don’t think the 9X, r74’s and python 4’s needs to be added any time soon. In fact it would just ruin air rb. The 9X is way above the puthon 4 in terms og capability, with its trust vectorin. The python 4 has more range yes, but the 9x is unflareable really and has thrust vectorin and full lockon after launch capabilities with full 180 degree launch parameters. And the iris-t is that and just better.
@@-..----.--.-... Thats actually a misunderstanding of flare mechanics. Soviet flares fire up and nato flares fire down. A 9X was flared by an Su22 about 6 years ago from a high rear aspect meaning the flares filled the seeker. the su22 pilot was in a dive heading for a bomb run while going defensive, avoiding the 9x and dying to an aim120 that came off the rail a few seconds after. the "characteristics" are identical its a ball of fire.
I would rather believe DCS over Warthunder any day of the YEARRRRRRRRRR DCS actually uses Real world Data as much as possible to make every aircraft model and missiles and radar and sensors to be as close to real life as much as Possible its so realistic with all the models that the USAF uses it to train pilots because its much cheaper than to fly a jet and it possibly crashing killing the pilot or just crashing and losing 70 million dollars so yea if the military uses DCS I would believe DCS over Warthunder any day Warthunder says it does the same thing like DCS but they dont because Gameplay and tactics are MUCHHH more different than Warthunder Warthunder cant even model tanks right they make T80's over perform acting like they have the Best armor in the world when their armor is simple Textolite mixed with rolled Steel it performs really good against modern sabots but composite armor on the Challenger Leopard and Abrams is extremely weak Then we got Mig-29 vs F16 IRL or DCS the F16 would win every time in a BVR or WVR combat same for F15 vs Su-27 because Nato Aircraft have good access to Tech Russians dont but Warthunder is a Russian Company so we know then you got the KA-50/52 able to shoot down Mach 1 fighter jets helicopters and tanks with its ATGM missiles which is extremely unrealistic then if you try that with the AH-64 Hellfires if the enemy helicopter moves just a little the Hellfire will completely miss but the Russian Vikhr ATGM will hit everytime VERY unrealistic then they wont add fire and forget Hellfires when WE NEED IT REALLY REALLY BAD the AH-64 is Super bad in ground RB because you will almost always die to a SPAA or KA50 because you have to sit still and maintain laser guidance and the M1a2 Sep v2 should have M829A3 or M829A4 because the M829A4 came out in 2015 the 3bm60 came out in 2016 so we should have M829A4 sabot because all the rounds are the same they can be used in all Abram models this is how unrealistic unbalanced Russian BIASED Warthunder really is Warthunder KNOWS the abrams has better lower glacis plate armor THEY KNOW IT DOES because if you Xray the abrams lower plate you can see that their is a BIG gap between the composite layer and the back Steel plate and the armor isnt just made out of DU its made with layers of Steel, Depleted Uranium and Ceramics the m1a2 and up versions should have Gen 2 armor packages but it dont in warthunder and the Leopard 2a6 2a7 Should be nearly impossible to pen its front armor but in warthunder You can easily do it and the ballistic computers in the abrams and leopard aren't implemented the stabilizers in the Leopard and Abrams are also not correct when the stab is on the turret and barrel should stay in the one spot you aimed it at even while turning and moving we should also have the ability to fire on the move using ballistic computer but we cant because Russian dont got one that is as accurate as the one the Abrams and Leopard has and another unrealistic thing about warthunder are the bombers such as B17 B25 they can tank 20mm HE shells because you can watch a YT video RN search up Luftwaffe Gun Camera: B-17 Attacked that B17 took a TONNNNNNNN of damage from that 20mm it had and the bomber was still flying at if nothing was wrong but in Warthunder you even get hit by 1 HE shell in the wing or the tail and your wing will break off or your tail will fall off Warthunder is MEGA unrealistic and they say they model tanks jets and helicopters to be perfect YEAH RIGHT LMFAO ! Hope you read this all good day
@@WyattChilson blah blah blah sounds like an american main crying about how america isnt an instant win nation, also AH-64 sucks in ground rb? Yeah sure, you are acting like the game is completely russian biased when its not as much as you try to make it seem. I play france dont even try to tell me im just a russian main
@@WyattChilson While some stuff is decent in DCS the modeling for Radars and signatures as well as guidance are not modeled well at all. Also the USAF... let alone any air wing in the US military does not use DCS to train pilots. I have worked with a number of airforce and naval airmen and all of them used solutions from FAAC. Not fucking DCS. There are plenty of videos of the Airforce trainers and they are all showing FAAC including for the f35.
Better pl8 with 50km range and 50g turn or 60g with insane irccm like r73 but smaller fov R73 is fov of 0.7 vs aim9l 3.6fov pl9 haa 0.3 so it will look the plan really well @@kittyrusher242
@@yair3219 pl-9 is not related to python 4, pl-8 is the Chinese version of python 3, pl-9 is a separate development. And the design and development behind the Lavi was sold to China by Israel
@@Soldo66666 it's best at rear aspect. It's not OP. From the front It rarely hits it works just like an R73. And to be fair the 9M nerf was needed because the fact it hit from every direction and was unflarable got annoying and at least it hits if used as a rear aspect
@@Soldo66666 it's easy to doge. The IRCCM is similar to the R73. It's flarable from a distance. Afterburner off turn while flaring. Not to mention pre flare works too.
@lightningstrike5024 that's because mat sees similar numbers and goes monkey brain. The quality of his information has severely declined and he's still put on a pedestal
Well, Python 5 was the counterpart to the Aim9X, the R73M, and stuff like the IRIS T Alma Would be competitive. I wouldn’t expect to see Python 5 anytime soon though, it’s basically impossible to flare, because it uses datalink to get updates on we’re the target is, and it’s seeker is incredibly modern
Yeah, we definitely need a counter to python 4, so noone gonna be struggling. We need to implement fox 3 to everyone at once. Meanwhile ussr: 95ya6 9k121 Kh-38 ml Kh-38 mt R-73 (dont tell me Aim-9m is equal in case of ircc and perfomance) R-27 et R-27 er No sh#t. Just add it and let a minor nation, wich still doesnt even have top-tier spaa, get something outstandingly good.
I honestly don’t really have an issue with the R-73 since most other planes outperform R-73 carriers in flight performance. Not to mention it’s IRCCM is kinda easy to spoof after the Defyn video. The ET is kinda good but I’ve been killed by it MAYBE twice since it’s been added, it’s really easy to flare from longer distances. The ER is going to lose its throne to the amraam next update, so at this point I don’t care. Everything else, sure I guess
Lol it’s close in dogfight performance to the R73 anyways, yeah it has more range and better flare resistance, but when they added the Python 3 a year ago, pretty much no one noticed, because the Israel player base is, as stated, very small. It wouldn’t be as game breaking as the R73 was, because the amount of players using it is like 1%.
@@christopherchartier3017I disagree what thunder top tier really isn’t about flight performance and planes like the su 27 can carry a lot, the r73 is better than the 9m by a lot the 9m is super easy to flare but it guy with r73 gets near you you can’t do anything
We still need better AA we gonna have 6 months atleast of the new su25 being unstoppable 0 balance they just worried about how nerf USA that’s why the update is delayed
@@Vengeance4308ground targets don't even render in until 25km, so that 40km is useless until you're 25km away from the battlefield. And the solution to the su-25 is spawning in a fighter and shooting it down.
Not really if they add the R73M and 9X it will be balanced. If US mains don't complain and then wt nerfs the shit out of everything like they normally always end up doing no hate to all US mains but some are low-key fucking brain dead and complain on the worst shit possible
@@TazOnYtthey’re not nearly as bad as German mains complaining. This is probably the only update where I actually do sympathize with them, but it’s no excuse for like EVERY OTHER UPDATE
@@christopherchartier3017 to be fair they got fucked not getting the better version of the 120. But for them to complain on the forums to nerf the R77 and MICA when it isn't even out get that's just crazzzy. Now don't get me wrong not every USA main is dumb. The majority of them just complain on a missile because it's better then what they have okay I get it but the US has nothing else better then the 9X which most likely will come next update
They shouldn't even remotely complain about the mica it was designed for short range and dogfights. So long range it doesn't have any effect unless a lock is actually kept on it
No. The PUMA that we have is the most basic version of the tank. The PUMA S1 is the variant that carries spikes. If the PUMA S1 were to be released this upcoming update, Gaijin would for sure show it off in the dev servers to create hype for Germany players. Honestly, this update is a slap in the face for German players. All we get is a premium tank, and a flying barn at 12.7 while nearly every other nation gets an upgrade to their already competitive line up of top tier vehicles.
I want the phyton 4 for the sake of israel becomming op. I don't want it for the game sake. There is no place for a missle this powerfull in this game at this time.
The ΔV doesn't say anything about the range/energy of a missile. For example: The R60 has a ΔV of 744.46 m/s and the R24R has a ΔV of 734,54, but obviosly the R24 has much more range/enegry compared to the R60. The AIM-9C (radar guided sidewinder) has almost the same ΔV as an R27R. So pls stop only looking at ΔV, it says NOTHING about a missiles range/energy.
they have technologies on par with aim9x, without having thrust vectoring, aam-3s should be way better in game but obviously for balancing reasons they only gave it a fraction of its power, so as of now its still arguably the best ir missile in game, having a very noticeable increase in range and sometimes pull over the aim9m
It’d have to be a super early Aim9X model. The Aim9X has a significantly better seeker than the Python 4, and if you thought the Python 4’s flare resistance was crazy, the Aim9X is way better. The Aim9X is on par with the Python 5
@@Skinny6539you underestimate the Python 4. It has very good range and energy, it’s dogfight performance is basically the same as the R73’s. And I’d like to see the current AAM3 pull a 360 and hit the target, or miss and turn around to hit the target. The Python 4 was the irl counterpart to the R73, so that would be fine. They could buff the AAM3, add a late Aim9M model (9M-8 or 9M-10) or a very early Aim9X model, add the MICA IR, and the IRIS T, I don’t know much about the PL-9, but it’s in the files too, so it can’t be that game breaking. Overall, I think this December would be a good time to add better IR missiles, but they could go with October like last year. We could also see the Typhoon and such in December or early/mid 2025
Bruh map design and gameplay doesn’t call for this stuff it’ll break the game. The way the game is played right now it will just be to ridiculous. Yea Id like to see them but we have bigger issues the game needs to get addressed
All I want rn is this fuckin update to be out I don't wanna wait anymore bruh 😭😭
19th June bro, 2 days to wait we can do it lol
@@Captain1991-I thought it was tomorrow?
You telling me these smooth brains can’t figure out how to upload an update
@@iceicebabyil small chance tomorrow I think it got delayed considering we got 0 news about downtime
@@iceicebabyil no because its war thunder and said yk what we don't have to tell them shit and decided not to post anything for 3 whole days
Thanks for the video Mat! Again, I think December is a good time to add it. Also, yes the Derby was designed to be a long range, radar guided Python 4. Oh, and Delta V is simply theoretical range. The R77 has more Delta V than the AMRAAM, but to find actual range, you have to factor in the drag coefficient, and use an equation to calculate the actual range. In practice, even though the R77 has more Delta V, the AMRAAM has a significantly less amount of drag, which equals a further range. I don’t think the performance would be crazy game breaking, the close range performance is similar, arguably worse than the R73, and we have to make the jump in flare resistance eventually. We made that jump last year, and everyone has figured out how to flare these missiles, we’ll figure out how to flare this. Again, we already have the dogfight performance in the R73. As I’ve said, probably December
Underrated comment. However, MWS/MAW systems would help a lot with it not being op in the game and keeping it balanced.
@@Thatrandomguy-fi6qz yes, stuff like the J11A would have a definite way of detecting an IR missile such as the Python 4, and I believe there are some other aircraft that can be upgraded to have a MAW system
Honestly 9Xs would make things.....trivial
Hilariously mid missile
@@patriotic-pandaproof?
@@WyattChilson incorrect, it can only has 50G, a 2000s missile. (The magic 2 was doing that back in 1986)
and 10 miles is actually fucking nothing lol. The mica IR can do about 37 miles and
And what do you mean locks the FOV to 1? Do you mean 1 degree? Because the R73 and magic 2 have .75 of a degree in game (though the magic 2 should be .43)
@@WyattChilson none of that is true. And The 9X block 2 just gave it data link.(in 2015 lmao) I literally have a document on my PC that states the 9X has only 50 Gs
@@WyattChilson your English tells me you didn’t serve in the USAF, and if you did. You’d know what OPSEC means
Technically we already get the Python 4 with next update. I‘m talking about the Derby Missile. That’s technically an enlarged version of the Python 4 with an active Radar Seeker.
I‘m honestly a bit concerned about the missiles we are getting. Toptier already is an absolute mess and it will only get worse with the introduction of active radar homing missiles. If Gaijin keeps this trend up we might get at some time to the point where they will introduce current gen missiles into the game and then it will only be who sees first will kill first.
Imagine you would have to face the MBDA Meteor. A missile with at least the range of the AIM-54 but the difference that it can accelerate in its terminal phase while being more agile than the AMRAAM. Or the AIM-9X. I play DCS, also competitive and that Missile is banned on most PvP Servers for a good reason. There are also mods that introduced the Python 5 and that missile is absolute bonkers, because it can do a 180 and kill a target that flies behind you while being almost 100% immune to flares. The AIM-9M is already too much for my opinion.
With this new data, I really hope to see the modernized Kfir C.10/Block 60; an upgrade made for the Colombian Air Force with Python 4s and Derbys.
With the current rank VIII premium jet being “Modernized” rank VII jets (F-20 and MiG-21 Bison) I expect this to be Israel’s premium rank VIII in the future
I love the Kfir C7, and a C10 would be awesome to see, I just don’t wanna have to pay for it lol
7:39 the Python 4 has 60-70 g's irl
you might actually be right cuz tge real info of the israrli missiles is top seacret
@@yair3219 Maybe i got documents 🤫
@@CAPYNANESLAY1708 daiimmmm
I believe it can hit 60-70 Gs when dual plane, but I don’t think that it forces dual plane turning, and I don’t think Gaijin even codes the extra pull, do we’re outta luck. Whatever, 50gs is still incredibly good
honestly, should be its own patch or put with the eurofighter/rafale where r74 9x and iris-t are added
I think R74 is way too advanced. Like, you thought the P4’s flare resistance was too powerful, the R74 can literally be programmed to ignore NATO caliber flares. I think the R73 would still be very viable and hold its own against the P4, the Magic 2, I’ve heard has the dual IRCCM irl, but I can’t find any source proving it. They could add either a really late version of the Aim9M, like the 9M-8 or 9M-10, which I believe get a better seeker and have 40Gs of pull, or they could add a very early version of the 9X, because it has a much more advanced seeker like the R74. They could buff the AAM3 to be historically accurate, and that would hold its own, and I don’t know much about the IRIS T, but it was around the same timeframe so that would work. And before you guys yell at me that the R73 is way worse than the Python 4, the P4 was the irl counterpart to the R73, and it was a close matchup, if you don’t believe me that they’re a close matchup in game, search “R73 vs Python 4” on YT, you might have to specify WT.
@@batlax18that’s doesn’t make any sense. How do you program something to ignore flares based on who makes it? Maybe I’m dumb, but in the eye of a IR missile a flare is just a massive splotch of heat that hides the aircraft’s heat signature and distract the missile. How would the missile be able to discern what heat signature belongs to which nation.
@@spongegobler3449 Soviet and NATO flares have different characteristics. That's why aim-9x, which was optimized and tested on nato flares was fooled by old soviet flares on Su-22 in 2017
I don’t think the 9X, r74’s and python 4’s needs to be added any time soon. In fact it would just ruin air rb. The 9X is way above the puthon 4 in terms og capability, with its trust vectorin. The python 4 has more range yes, but the 9x is unflareable really and has thrust vectorin and full lockon after launch capabilities with full 180 degree launch parameters. And the iris-t is that and just better.
@@-..----.--.-... Thats actually a misunderstanding of flare mechanics.
Soviet flares fire up and nato flares fire down.
A 9X was flared by an Su22 about 6 years ago from a high rear aspect meaning the flares filled the seeker.
the su22 pilot was in a dive heading for a bomb run while going defensive, avoiding the 9x and dying to an aim120 that came off the rail a few seconds after.
the "characteristics" are identical its a ball of fire.
According to DCS, Py4 is a 360 death stick.
I would rather believe DCS over Warthunder any day of the YEARRRRRRRRRR DCS actually uses Real world Data as much as possible to make every aircraft model and missiles and radar and sensors to be as close to real life as much as Possible its so realistic with all the models that the USAF uses it to train pilots because its much cheaper than to fly a jet and it possibly crashing killing the pilot or just crashing and losing 70 million dollars so yea if the military uses DCS I would believe DCS over Warthunder any day Warthunder says it does the same thing like DCS but they dont because Gameplay and tactics are MUCHHH more different than Warthunder Warthunder cant even model tanks right they make T80's over perform acting like they have the Best armor in the world when their armor is simple Textolite mixed with rolled Steel it performs really good against modern sabots but composite armor on the Challenger Leopard and Abrams is extremely weak Then we got Mig-29 vs F16 IRL or DCS the F16 would win every time in a BVR or WVR combat same for F15 vs Su-27 because Nato Aircraft have good access to Tech Russians dont but Warthunder is a Russian Company so we know then you got the KA-50/52 able to shoot down Mach 1 fighter jets helicopters and tanks with its ATGM missiles which is extremely unrealistic then if you try that with the AH-64 Hellfires if the enemy helicopter moves just a little the Hellfire will completely miss but the Russian Vikhr ATGM will hit everytime VERY unrealistic then they wont add fire and forget Hellfires when WE NEED IT REALLY REALLY BAD the AH-64 is Super bad in ground RB because you will almost always die to a SPAA or KA50 because you have to sit still and maintain laser guidance and the M1a2 Sep v2 should have M829A3 or M829A4 because the M829A4 came out in 2015 the 3bm60 came out in 2016 so we should have M829A4 sabot because all the rounds are the same they can be used in all Abram models this is how unrealistic unbalanced Russian BIASED Warthunder really is Warthunder KNOWS the abrams has better lower glacis plate armor THEY KNOW IT DOES because if you Xray the abrams lower plate you can see that their is a BIG gap between the composite layer and the back Steel plate and the armor isnt just made out of DU its made with layers of Steel, Depleted Uranium and Ceramics the m1a2 and up versions should have Gen 2 armor packages but it dont in warthunder and the Leopard 2a6 2a7 Should be nearly impossible to pen its front armor but in warthunder You can easily do it and the ballistic computers in the abrams and leopard aren't implemented the stabilizers in the Leopard and Abrams are also not correct when the stab is on the turret and barrel should stay in the one spot you aimed it at even while turning and moving we should also have the ability to fire on the move using ballistic computer but we cant because Russian dont got one that is as accurate as the one the Abrams and Leopard has and another unrealistic thing about warthunder are the bombers such as B17 B25 they can tank 20mm HE shells because you can watch a YT video RN search up Luftwaffe Gun Camera: B-17 Attacked that B17 took a TONNNNNNNN of damage from that 20mm it had and the bomber was still flying at if nothing was wrong but in Warthunder you even get hit by 1 HE shell in the wing or the tail and your wing will break off or your tail will fall off Warthunder is MEGA unrealistic and they say they model tanks jets and helicopters to be perfect YEAH RIGHT LMFAO ! Hope you read this all good day
@@WyattChilson blah blah blah sounds like an american main crying about how america isnt an instant win nation, also AH-64 sucks in ground rb? Yeah sure, you are acting like the game is completely russian biased when its not as much as you try to make it seem. I play france dont even try to tell me im just a russian main
@@WyattChilson While some stuff is decent in DCS the modeling for Radars and signatures as well as guidance are not modeled well at all. Also the USAF... let alone any air wing in the US military does not use DCS to train pilots. I have worked with a number of airforce and naval airmen and all of them used solutions from FAAC. Not fucking DCS. There are plenty of videos of the Airforce trainers and they are all showing FAAC including for the f35.
You wanna buy some death sticks?
@@WyattChilson Are you forbidden to use commas and dots?
Gaijin must introduce the Pl-9 that are already in the files, it would be a great improvement to the J-8F since it receives an increase in BR
What is the pl9 cuz sources vary?
Better pl8 with 50km range and 50g turn or 60g with insane irccm like r73 but smaller fov
R73 is fov of 0.7 vs aim9l 3.6fov pl9 haa 0.3 so it will look the plan really well @@kittyrusher242
bro pl9 is a worst chineese version of the python 4 like they alawys do. they even stall our aircraft desine, the "Lavi"
@@yair3219 pl-9 is not related to python 4, pl-8 is the Chinese version of python 3, pl-9 is a separate development. And the design and development behind the Lavi was sold to China by Israel
@@valentinodestefano6307 israel only sold parts of the lavi not the desine
you cant imagen how excited i am to see tge python 4 in the files😁😁
It’s actually been in the files since last year , the Sons of Atilla update, so about 9 months. I’d expect to see it relatively soon
It would be interesting to see that crop duster the US made into a light ground attack aircraft as a premium, I'd buy it just for fun lmao
sorry about what happened recently as well, hope you get better.
I would love to see the A29 Support Tucano
@@johnwhite4960 for sure!
They do that i want my f22 next update too
@@7zobzombie yeah that aint coming anytime soon
When the update?
fun fact, irl the magic 2 also has both types of IRCCM.
Lmao the magic 2 is already op as is, imagine when it will be buffed to its real strength, the mirage f1 at 11.3 will make a carnage.
@@Soldo66666 it's best at rear aspect. It's not OP. From the front It rarely hits it works just like an R73. And to be fair the 9M nerf was needed because the fact it hit from every direction and was unflarable got annoying and at least it hits if used as a rear aspect
@@TazOnYt idk i just shoot it whenever i get a lock and the enemies are rarely able to flare it
@@Soldo66666 it's easy to doge. The IRCCM is similar to the R73. It's flarable from a distance. Afterburner off turn while flaring. Not to mention pre flare works too.
Delta V Stands vor Change in Velocity Not Change in Potential Energy
Yess i waited long enough
so no update cool
Thursday
@@User-nk8stthought it was supposed to be tomorrow when did they say Thursday
@@iceicebabyil it’s normally 1 week after dev server closes but it could be tomorrow
@@User-nk8st it’s been a week
@@iceicebabyil the dev closed last Thursday
where is the update??
Thursday
Wednesday or Thursday
I want my aim 9x
HE KEEPS COMPARING MISSILES BY THEIR DELTA V
Read the damn comments i left in the AMRAAM video L
thats because that is a comparable stat
@lightningstrike5024 that's because mat sees similar numbers and goes monkey brain. The quality of his information has severely declined and he's still put on a pedestal
@@PerciusLive elaborate?
@@lightningstrike5024 It is irelevant for range
Check the comment i left on the amraam video with the correct way to determine the missile range
@@lightningstrike5024 Nothing to elaborate on. He just does not understand how missile ranges are comared.
But at some point python 5 will be added. What other nations will get to compete with it?
Well, Python 5 was the counterpart to the Aim9X, the R73M, and stuff like the IRIS T Alma
Would be competitive. I wouldn’t expect to see Python 5 anytime soon though, it’s basically impossible to flare, because it uses datalink to get updates on we’re the target is, and it’s seeker is incredibly modern
sorry but forum mods confirmed they believe python 4 is to op for now
Wait till the python 5 gets in the game and 360 kill people
Yeah, we definitely need a counter to python 4, so noone gonna be struggling. We need to implement fox 3 to everyone at once.
Meanwhile ussr:
95ya6
9k121
Kh-38 ml
Kh-38 mt
R-73 (dont tell me Aim-9m is equal in case of ircc and perfomance)
R-27 et
R-27 er
No sh#t. Just add it and let a minor nation, wich still doesnt even have top-tier spaa, get something outstandingly good.
I honestly don’t really have an issue with the R-73 since most other planes outperform R-73 carriers in flight performance. Not to mention it’s IRCCM is kinda easy to spoof after the Defyn video. The ET is kinda good but I’ve been killed by it MAYBE twice since it’s been added, it’s really easy to flare from longer distances. The ER is going to lose its throne to the amraam next update, so at this point I don’t care. Everything else, sure I guess
ahem also the pantsir in general
Lol it’s close in dogfight performance to the R73 anyways, yeah it has more range and better flare resistance, but when they added the Python 3 a year ago, pretty much no one noticed, because the Israel player base is, as stated, very small. It wouldn’t be as game breaking as the R73 was, because the amount of players using it is like 1%.
@@christopherchartier3017I disagree what thunder top tier really isn’t about flight performance and planes like the su 27 can carry a lot, the r73 is better than the 9m by a lot the 9m is super easy to flare but it guy with r73 gets near you you can’t do anything
i was gona explain how these are balanced but if you think the kh-38ml is op then im not even gona try
where is the update ???? :(
Any news about update ?
If nothing is posted tonight then it will come on Thursday
@@User-nk8st probably they messed something. It seems like they have problems with flares and chaffs 🤣🤣
@@Al_Basileus no, the update normally comes out 1 week after dev server closes
Wednesday or Thursday
We still need better AA we gonna have 6 months atleast of the new su25 being unstoppable 0 balance they just worried about how nerf USA that’s why the update is delayed
New Su-25?
@@fate3071 su25sm3 has 40km missiles
@Vengeance4308 it's not really new anymore though lol, but I don't play ground either so I don't know what ground ordinance is broken or not
@@fate3071 yes it’s very broken when it has 4 times the range of adats
@@Vengeance4308ground targets don't even render in until 25km, so that 40km is useless until you're 25km away from the battlefield. And the solution to the su-25 is spawning in a fighter and shooting it down.
Mica ir will be op
Not really if they add the R73M and 9X it will be balanced. If US mains don't complain and then wt nerfs the shit out of everything like they normally always end up doing no hate to all US mains but some are low-key fucking brain dead and complain on the worst shit possible
@@TazOnYtthey’re not nearly as bad as German mains complaining. This is probably the only update where I actually do sympathize with them, but it’s no excuse for like EVERY OTHER UPDATE
@@christopherchartier3017 to be fair they got fucked not getting the better version of the 120. But for them to complain on the forums to nerf the R77 and MICA when it isn't even out get that's just crazzzy. Now don't get me wrong not every USA main is dumb. The majority of them just complain on a missile because it's better then what they have okay I get it but the US has nothing else better then the 9X which most likely will come next update
They shouldn't even remotely complain about the mica it was designed for short range and dogfights. So long range it doesn't have any effect unless a lock is actually kept on it
@@TazOnYt Yeah, but it’s one thing to complain about your own stuff like us mains but German mains complain about everything else
hello brazilian comrade mat
I wonder could Japan get the amm-5 or would it be a power creep??
Seeker head is too advanced. Imagine putting the type 81's irccm on a TVC 50-60 G missile
Once the AAM 3 gets buffed to be historically accurate, it’ll hold its own just fine
I just want the patch to be out so my RP i gain not go to waste
discord is gone ?
You guys think the Puma will get Spikes?
No. The PUMA that we have is the most basic version of the tank. The PUMA S1 is the variant that carries spikes. If the PUMA S1 were to be released this upcoming update, Gaijin would for sure show it off in the dev servers to create hype for Germany players. Honestly, this update is a slap in the face for German players. All we get is a premium tank, and a flying barn at 12.7 while nearly every other nation gets an upgrade to their already competitive line up of top tier vehicles.
I hope we can see the PUMA soon and maybe together with the Eurofighter eventhough i don't think we'll get it this year@@spongegobler3449
How much rp are the new planes
410,000
J11a could carry pl10
I want the phyton 4 for the sake of israel becomming op. I don't want it for the game sake. There is no place for a missle this powerfull in this game at this time.
The ΔV doesn't say anything about the range/energy of a missile. For example: The R60 has a ΔV of 744.46 m/s and the R24R has a ΔV of 734,54, but obviosly the R24 has much more range/enegry compared to the R60. The AIM-9C (radar guided sidewinder) has almost the same ΔV as an R27R. So pls stop only looking at ΔV, it says NOTHING about a missiles range/energy.
Right?! Delta V is simply theoretical range, You need the Delta V and drag coefficient to fine the actual range
if we will ad phyton 4 we wil need aim 9x,iris-t,pl9,pl1
ok so make aam-3s perform like they do irl, they perform like python4s if not better already
they have technologies on par with aim9x, without having thrust vectoring, aam-3s should be way better in game but obviously for balancing reasons they only gave it a fraction of its power, so as of now its still arguably the best ir missile in game, having a very noticeable increase in range and sometimes pull over the aim9m
all those will be added first and then 6 months later well get the python 4
It’d have to be a super early Aim9X model. The Aim9X has a significantly better seeker than the Python 4, and if you thought the Python 4’s flare resistance was crazy, the Aim9X is way better. The Aim9X is on par with the Python 5
@@Skinny6539you underestimate the Python 4. It has very good range and energy, it’s dogfight performance is basically the same as the R73’s. And I’d like to see the current AAM3 pull a 360 and hit the target, or miss and turn around to hit the target. The Python 4 was the irl counterpart to the R73, so that would be fine. They could buff the AAM3, add a late Aim9M model (9M-8 or 9M-10) or a very early Aim9X model, add the MICA IR, and the IRIS T, I don’t know much about the PL-9, but it’s in the files too, so it can’t be that game breaking. Overall, I think this December would be a good time to add better IR missiles, but they could go with October like last year. We could also see the Typhoon and such in December or early/mid 2025
update when
Tmr or Wednesday most likely
Thursday the absolute latest
caramba esse python 4 é tão roubado assim?
Bruh map design and gameplay doesn’t call for this stuff it’ll break the game. The way the game is played right now it will just be to ridiculous. Yea Id like to see them but we have bigger issues the game needs to get addressed