TOP 10 MUSCLE CARS OF THE 80'S
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 май 2024
- In this video we discuss iconic muscle cars of the 1980's. So sit back, relax and feel the power and torque of the 80's most memorable muscle cars!
#top10musclecars, #musclecars, #musclecar, #classiccars, #top10musclecarsofthe80’s, #best80smusclecars, #musclecarsofthe80s, #bestcarofthe80s, #fastestmusclecarsofthe80s, #greatestmusclecarsofalltime, #americancarsinthe80s, #fordmustang5.0, #pontiacfirebirdtransam, #chevroletmontecarloss, #dodgechargershelby 
Развлечения
You don't seem to know your cars very well.
If your talking about 1980s cars, you shouldn't be showing the road runner of the 1970s or the olds 442 from the 70s as well. Totally different versions.!
I can certainly understand your point/perspective. The Olds 442 definitely came into its own in the 1970's, but still had an impact into the 1980's. What other cars/models would you have liked to see included?
Try to goggle your pictures and text you missed the mark
WTF man! I saw that too, and what does a 1.6 liter inline 4 have to do with a V8???? WTF where the hell is this guy from? I think he just came out of walmart in his pajamas at closing time!
You’re.
@@The80sForSure-jh4jk - 442 was strong in 1960's... a joke name afterwards...
Plymouth Road Runner ENDED 1980... and another joke by then...
None of the 3 Corvette engines you show were available in the 1980s Corvettes...
Obviously for the 80s, the grand national should be number one.
The 5.0 shown for the IROC had "Powered by Ford" on the valve covers. You showed a Monte Carlo SS while talking about the Grand National. My Dad had an 87 Shelby Charger. It was shockingly quick. And if you got the GLH (Goes Like Hell) version, it was even quicker. The 442 and Road Runner were both early 70s, not 80s.
Exactly! Also, I remember the GLHS . That little car was quick!
Thanks for pointing that out,Talking about the Chevy Mote Carlo,shows a pic of a VW engine 😂
You have absolutely no clue about cars, especially the 1980's.
WOW!!!
I never knew that the IROC came with a FORD engine.
Mine had a 5.7 Chevy.
Did anyone else notice that when he mentioned the 5.0 in the IROC, it showed a Ford engine in the video?
I can't watch this anymore. In the first few minutes there have been pics that have no relationship with what he is saying.
Like ford 5.0 being a pic of a 2.3L.
Wow...first car, IROC Z, shows a pic of a small block Ford. Second, the 5.0 Mustang, shows a 2.3 four banger. Third, the Trans-Am, shows mostly late 70's and a '90s version and then includes a pic of a Toyota inline 6 engine while talking about the 5.0 and 5.7. At 3 minutes in I'm done! 🤣
Grand National shows a GNX... GNX was an $11,000.00 option package...
Yes, this could have been a good video, but he needs to go back and re-make it...not use random mis-matched photos and videos of the subject cars, this video is a disaster because of just that...and do better research..the Roadrunner wasn't even an '80's car...and the ranking is kind of screwed up, too...a top 5 ranking that would be closer to accurate would be...1)-Buick Grand National/GNX ..2)1989 Pontiac Trans Am Turbo...3)1985-89(remember, we are doing the '80's here)Ford Mustang 5.0 H.O.(both GT and LX)...4)1985-89 Chevrolet Camaro Iroc Z...5)Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe...6)1984-86 Ford Mustang SVO...7) 1983-88 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS...8)1984-87 Dodge Shelby Charger Turbo...9)1982-84 Ford Mustang GT 5.0...10)1980-81 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am...I would not consider the Corvette, it is really in a different class...
Young people writing about previous eras need to run their ideas, scripts, and videos past an experienced older 'car' person from those days for editing/correcting/grading before posting them... to gain credibility... stop confusing misinformation...
In dyer2cycle's list, none of those listed meet the definition of a "Muscle Car", which is a midsized RWD family car with the bigger engine from a full size car... and, of course, Mustang/Camaro/Firebird are "pony cars"... '80s Chrysler products are FWD...
@@BuzzLOLOL Dyer 2 Cycle's list?..I am 57, I was a teen/young adult during those years, and I know what everybody wanted, some bought them, many couldn't afford them. the 5.0 Mustangs were the most prolific in my area, mostly because they were more within the budgets, or "payment limits", or the young people in my area. Others bought Monte Carlo SS or a few IROC Z's, usually the more well to do had the IROC's...A lot of young guys I know also bought Mustang LX 5.0's instead of GT's...they were cheaper, lighter, and some thought they had a cleaner look than the GT's with all the added-on doo-dads..the Holy Grail was the Grand National, only a couple were around here, and people took notice. A lot of others(including me) had older/classic cars...I remember a guy who had a '69 GTX with 440 4 speed..I had a 57 Chevy and a '66 Nova SS..this was still a time when a teenager or young guy could buy these cars, and the ones we had were far from "mint"...those cars I mentioned WERE muscle cars of the 1980's-not '60's muscle cars, but still muscle cars...
@@dyer2cycle - Turn your age numbers around for me... 75... retired GM/Chevy Engineer...
When I was in high school, any kid with an after school job could buy a new car if parents would sign for the payments... CarterFlation ruined that for you guys... new car prices tripled over his 4 years... wages DIDN'T... I special ordered a new '77 Pontiac GP for $5K... 4 years later when I looked at '81 GPs they were $15K and they didn't even want to let me have a V8 again, just V6s were coming through because of high gas prices... Mustangs were viewed as cheap throwaway rustbuckets... and after 1978, they looked Japanese like Mazdas... proud American factory workers/executives didn't want them...
In 1990's, every used car lot in town around here had used Grand Nationals on them... they weren't that particularly fast, unless you got one of the 500 with $11K GNX option... just cantankerous used cars by them... early 1960's I daily drove the turbocharged Jetfire:
ruclips.net/video/Jzw5W1rRMog/видео.html
We had a lot of new USA cars around here in 1960's because of Ford, GM, AMC, Jeep, 2 Chrysler, Champion Sparkplug, Tillotson Carburetor, Electric Autolite, Dana Axle, DeVilbiss compressors, etc big factories... people making good money and getting discounts on new cars... foreign cars were looked at as over priced, weak engined, short lived junk...
The 80's Oldsmobile 442 was around until 1987, yet you only showed pics of the early 70's model. The Roadrunner was discontinued in 1980.
Not a car guy putting this together? All the Cutlass was from 69 to the late 70's and the roadrunners was late 60's to mid 70's.........no 80's for either one.
Good effort… but poor dialogue to photos/ inaccurate
I'm sorry you didn't find it as informative as it should be. What would you change/alter?
@@The80sForSure-jh4jk I think he told you
FYI, The Monte Carlo SS were never provided with a 5.7 litre 350. Only 5.0 litre 305s.
The 442 and Road Runner depicted in this video were the ones from the 70's. The ones in the 80's were not nearly as impressive, with the Cutlass being downsized and the RoadRunner being part of the Volare chassis.
Many F-body Chryslers (Diplomat, Volare, etc) could have the 5.9 all the way up till '84.
The 442 in the ‘80s was cool. It had those Lightning Rod shifters. Like a sequential transmission.
Oh ya, I forgot about the volare
This is what happens when kids talk about cars from 40 years ago
They were all dogs, learning years of furl injection, abs, air bags. Only performance car was the Grand National. Nothing from the 80s could beat it
Not even close to their 80s version.
It is like this video was made by a reject bot from the planet Zoltron who just got to Earth yesterday.. Too many screw ups in this to mention.
Too funny! (But not wrong...)
The Ford Mustang 5.0 actually had a 4.9 liter V8(you can thank Car And Driver magazine for that). The current Mustang has a true 5.0 liter V8.
4.00 thats a Chevy Monte carlo. Not a Grand national
at 1:38 they show a Capri instead of a Mustang.
4 speed manual transition. .... now there's a unique feature.
Really needed more research.
Damn crazy to think 80s muscle cars have “impressive” power and “exhilarating” performance😂
maybe you need to test drive the 1987 Buick Grand National GNX
@@rodneyjones8433that car was an exception.
@@rodneyjones8433 Or any 86-87 Regal T-Type, Turbo T, Turbo Limited and of course the Grand National!!!!
All I did to my Shelby Charger was performance chip, injectors, and ported intak/exhaust and I smoked the first two cars with over twice the displacement.
The video started off ok but you keep showing off 60’s and 70’s cars. You also show wrong engines for what you are describing. You do show a lot of nice looking performance cars and I liked that a lot.
Funny how there are a lot of cars in this video that were not built in the 80s. The shots of V8 engines that are actually 4cyl is strange too.
Yup! Sorta clueless.
Since I started driving in that era, here is my list. Some of them I do not remember the exact years.
1. Buick Grand National GNX. Nothing else comes close.
2. Pontiac Trans AM 20th anniversary edition
3. C4 Corvette
4. Mustang 5.0 GT and LX 1987 on
5. Pontiac Trans AM 5.7L v8
6. IROC-Z 5.7L v8
7. Toyota Supra Turbo 1987 on
8. Mustang SVO 1986
9. Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
10. Mitsubishi Eclipse Turbo (Plymouth Laser/Eagle Talon)
I agree on the GNX, NO other car on this list will out perform or bring more money at an auction. I watch these video's, and they're SO opinionated, and mostly WRONG...LOL This guy was showing cars from the 70's, in an 80's video. As for the Toyota...It's not American, but my 2nd favorite with the 2JZ engine, I was disappointed when they brought it back with a BMW drivetrain
Dodge Daytona Shelby would beat half those cars in stock form. It will beat them all including the Grand National after you turn up the boost and open up the exhaust. Ask me how I know.
The 2.2 turbo from Dodge is much more capable and easier to tune then the SVO.
Could buy 3 GT 5.0's for 1 GNX
#10 would be a conquest and TSI
A 1978-79 220hp 400 trans am, and the little red express truck would go mid 14's in the 1/4. Magazines in the early 80's never referenced those last of the muscle car benchmarks. Magazines were busy pumping praise on a 157hp mustang gt and a 145hp Z28 back in 1982
I had one of those 1982 Mustang GTs.
Fun car, but very easy to lose it going around a corner in the rain, CRAZY light in the rear and not enough tire.
The upgraded tires on the 1983s would fit the same rims though, and helped a LOT.
I could also burn rubber if I launched at anything over 1300 RPM with those 190/65R390 TRXs - the 220/55s let me do 1800 with no other changes.
Car DID benefit in both power AND fuel economy from a set of dual headers into a pair of Hush Thrush mufflers instead of the catalytic - and was still clean enough after a tune-up to pass emissions (barely).
And given what was available in 1980 and 1981, the "157 HP" Mustang WAS a major step towards real performance again (the mid-200s foot pounds of torque also helped).
NO 3rd gens shown...
@@bricefleckenstein9666 Until you got spanked by a Dodge Omni!
@@lisam4503 Never happened.
Only way it COULD happen (and it was possible) is if the Mustang driver was too heavy on the throttle off the line and burned rubber too long, while the Omni had a near perfect launch.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 The Fox bodies were dogs back then! Throw some of today's technology at them and you got something! I've driven 5.0 Mustangs and Turbo cars from Chrysler back then.
Anyone else notice the Monte SS during the Grand National part? 4:02
The strongest engine in the Camaro IROC-Z was the 5.7 liter tuned port injected one which Inhad in my 1988 white IROC-Z. It was only offered with an automatic transmission. Hp was around 225. The 5.0 tuned port injected engines ho ratings were around 205. But you could get a maual shift with that engine. The IROC-Z's unfortunately did not come with dual exhausts, atleast mine didn't. It was a pretty decent handling car.
Thanks for sharing. I always liked the overall design of the IROC, just thought the build quality was questionable.
The TPI 305" got up to 230 HP and with 5 speed manual... TPI 350" to 240 HP (still automatic only) in F-bodies, 250 HP in Corvettes... F-bodies had large single exhaust pipe with dual rear pipes/tips available... of course aftermarket made headers and bigger crossover pipes, single pipe, mufflers available...
lol i loved racing you iroc guys. my 68 Camaro was a 12 second bracket racer and all you guys thought you had me until i walked away from you. i just loved toying with anybody in an iroc.
@@1heavyelementu NEVER pulled the GM junk up beside a MIGHTY MOPAR BIG BLOCK HEMI pal
@@BuzzLOLOL 245 h.p. for the 5.7L T.P.I., in the 1991-1992 Z/28.
JUST BAAAAD
Ok....I watched the first 2 min.When you called the Chevy 5.0(that would be the 305) powerful,the video was done for me.
It was eventually 230 netHP...
the H.O. version was fairly powerful for 1980's standards...but then they showed a Ford 5.0(302)...not the right engine for the car described...
half of the cars you put on here are not from the 80's
You forgot the Daytona, Mitsubishi 3000gt, Nissan 300zx..
Why is this man showing vehicles from the 60’s and 70’s
We wish there was an 80s roadrunner lol
Hurst Olds should have been added to the list
I had a 1983 Mustang Gt I loved that car
These Trans Ams are not from the 80's... Late 70's they are.
Same with the Road Runner, And the Olds 442. This is one of the worst presentations I've seen in a while
I don't even know where to get started
You don't know the difference between a 70's car or an 80's car.
Or a Grand National from a Monte Carlo...LOL
The T Bird Super Coupe and The Lincoln Mark VII LSC should have been mentioned as well. The Monte SS and Tbird turbo were dogs.
Oh the inaccuracies. Not one 80s Olds 442 was shown. The C4 Corvette only had 2 engine options, the crossfire injected 350, or the TPI 350, not an array of engine options. If you're going to mention the trans am in the 80s, you need to mention the third gens, being they carried through 8 model years to the second gens 2 model years. The late second gens were turds as well. I've never once heard anyone say that the Monte Carlo SS was a "muscle" car with a 305 at best weighing almost 4000 LBS. That's #10 easy. Also no one has ever stated that the Shelby charger was a muscle car, it was more like a hot hatch. The only roadrunner of the 80s was the 80 and it was a shell of it's former self. Didn't last 1 year, so why include it? That's a 60s, 70s muscle car, not an 80s where it was just a version of the Dodge Aspen. Here's my list in no particular order:
Buick Grand National
Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z28
Pontiac Trans Am GTA
Ford Mustang GT
Ford Mustang SVO
Oldsmobile Cutlass 442
89 Pontiac Turbo Trans Am
Maybe the Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Aerocouoe just because of it's styling.
Two more huh?? Muscle car, so RWD, 2 door coupe, American made.....
Ok, i guess the Chevrolet C4 Corvette makes it.
Last one would maybe be.....a Pontiac Fiero GT??? Or do we consider a Ford Taurus SHO as muscle car??? I don't know. I just know this list is all jacked up.
And I thought the segment was about the eighties but yet he keeps showing early 70's model cars
When you talk about Muscle Cars I think that they should be V8's
The only Trans Ams shown were from the 1970’s and 1990’s. C’mon. Where does it end? Oh, why don’t you just describe the Buick Grand National and show a Monte Carlo SS right in the middle of the GN part? That would be almost criminal. Wait. What!?!?!?!
This guy needs to be educated about this
Man I love those TurboTbirds. I've got a charcoal gray 87 & a silver 88, both loaded, sunroofs & two tone leather, also the absolute most comfortable seats I've ever sat in. The silver 1988 is my favorite & my speed demon, owned since 2006 & continually modified & upgraded, been to a tach calculated & GPS nearest clocking of 155-158 mph. Got a 140 factory style speedometer to install, but hell it's still not gonna read to the point 18psi boost & gearing come to their limits and the tach needle advances no further, maximum attainable speed. A front mount intercooler & bigger exhaust are coming, certainly 160+mph and a few more street races I'll win. Ford #1
Get a KPH speedo and adjust it to read MPH...
Get some heat defusers and rear wing or slow down knight Rider
I'll race you in my modified Buick GNX
@rodneyjones8433 your GNX the speed demon and my LS swap YUGO , you down ? 🫢👊
@@zacariasblanco9738 Do you want my Buick GN, or my LS GTO...LOL
I bought a new Plymouth turismo in 1982 that was the forunner of the Shelby charger
Mine had 2.2 overhead cam 4cyl basically is half of 318ci. Tuneup was the same as the v8. The exception was mine powered by Direct Connection performance enhanced.. Hi perform intake,computer,dual exhaust side air dams,front spoiler,aero dynamic headlight covers. It was a one of a kind because the Shelby charger wasn't a thing until 1984. I was two years before with my transformation. That little 4cyl back the was producing250hp on the front wheels because it was frontwheel drive. The Chrysler dealership wanted to pay me to have it displayed on their lot to promote that car. Direct Connection paid me for sponsorship since I had put alot of money into a new car.. I ran the car at our local drag strip.. Man I wish I still had that car.Someehere I will post a picture of that car. It was normally aspirated with a boosted down draft velocity carb 2brl. It was very quick because the car weighed less than 3000lbs. Beautiful to look at. Some of the v8sduring that Era didn't want to get embarrassed by that car.
This video is seriously flawed. 😂
Well, I'm a seriously flawed person, so says my wife.
Man don't take that from her. Im just kidding she could be right. Lol! You had good choices your pics didn't go with the years and engines. But I agree with the line up you choose
@@The80sForSure-jh4jk - Monte Carlo didn't get 5.7L engine in 1980's... except 1984 in Mexico only...
@@BuzzLOLOL Even with the 5.7 engine, still couldn't touch the Buick GN in the quarter...LOL
@@rodneyjones8433 - Yeah, Mexican Monte got the slug LM1 350" engine... but $200 in parts could make it beat a GN... even a GNX...
Nun- just 👍 🎶!😝
NICE LS IN THE C4 MINE HAS AN LT5
🆗 Trans Am& GrandNat!
If you are going to do a piece on eighties cars , how about using cars from the eighties.
My 2005 Hyundai sonata 6 cyl would destroy every one of those cars with the possible exception of the GNX. I owned a 1979 Formula Firebird that was beautiful and fun to drive, but every new car on the road today would eat it alive. The late 70’s and 80’s blew as far as performance goes.
Nobody will remember your Hyundai in 30 years.
@@MH-so9oz wow, you figured that out all by yourself Captain Obvious?😄
@@kevwmobile3238 long before your pointless, obvious original post. Junior.
@@MH-so9oz actually I thought my original point was quite spot on and understandable to most folks. I didn’t think it required the obvious that the newer car I mentioned would ever be a classic. My oldest brother had a 64 tri power goat, and a 68 super sport aluminum block Camaro, and my other brother owned a 67 Lemans, and my neighbor had over 40 classic cars including a GT 500 KR, a herts rent a race car bock and gold Shelby, and two other Shelby’s, and another neighbor a 70 Hemi Cuda, so yes I understand Classic cars
@kevwmobile3238 actually, your 06 Hyundai would lose to the 89 20th anniversary Trans AM, the GNX, the Vette, the Taurus SHO, and the GLHs Dodge Omni.
Corvette is not a muscle car, it is a true sports car. 2 seater only.
What’s a “coop”? 😂
🇺🇸
It’s coupé.
Everyone knows the only car that was any good from the 80's wash the BUICK GRAND NATIONAL. Ii kicked every other cars ass from the era. That SVO mustang had the same drive train as the Thunderturd. That is the #2 car from the 80's. All the others you can trow in the air and see where they land on the list. LOL !! You still did great job on the video..Very interesting
There were a couple of cool, and often forgotten or overlooked cars on this list though.
I love when people who know nothing about cars do car videos...
you could show an 80s 442 and not the 70s version. Also, Road runner not in the 80s!
Showing 77/78 and 90's Trans Ams as 80's cars, really!!!!
Can't beat a g-body💪🏾
Impressive, robust power and torque...exhilarating acceleration and thrilling performance...from cars making 180hp(except the GN). The narration is just comical.
I don't think this guy was around in the 80s 😂
There's a correction needed with the 442. 442 actually stood for a 400ci motor, 4 barrel carburetor, and a duel exhaust. The transmission came with either a 4 speed automatic or 4 speed manual transmission.
There's a few corrections, like how are you going to rate the Ford Thunderbird over the Grand National...What Muscle car out performed the GN, what Muscle brings a quarter of a million at auctions
Actually he was right about the Olds 442, he's just in the wrong decade, he's showing the Olds from the 70's on a 80's review, same with the Road Runner
Actually, he's correct, 442 stood for 4 bbl. carb., 4 speed, dual exhausts in '64... even 4 doors... LOL!
In '65, 400" Olds tall deck engine replaced 330" Olds short deck engine, and '4' then became 400"...
442 never had a 4 speed automatic in '60s or 70's with 330" or 400" engine...
In '80s, 442 got 4 speed automatic with hyper 307" engine... maybe 350" in a Hurst Olds...
Depends on the year of 442 what it stood for. I also never knew that the IROC=Z Camaro had a Ford 5.0v8. But the Ford Mustang 5.0 was not shown just the 2.3 Lima 4 cylinder.
@@rodneyjones8433not to mention the Monte Carlo SS and Dodge Shelby Charger being placed higher than the GN
The sky is smoking too much of that stuff. Not only did he show cars that weren't even made in the 80s some of the models si-chao were from the late 60s LOL
80's Top 10 Muscle Cars.
1: 1987 Buick GNX
2: 1989 Turbo Trans-Am (also a turbo Buick 3.8)
3: 1986-1987 Buick Grand National
4: 1987up EFI 5.0 Mustang
5: 1986up 5.7 TPI Camaro/Firebird twins
6: 1983-1985 5.0 Mustang/Capri. Last muscle car with a Holley 4 Barrell.
7: Dodge Shelby GLHS 2.2 Turbo/Intercooled Omni and Charger
8: 1989 Thunderbird SuperCoupe. Would run 14.9 with a 5spd. Monte Carlo SS 305's, Olds 442 w/307, and Grand Prix 2+2's were all 16sec turds
9: 1989 SHO Taurus
10: 1989 Chevy 454SS. Because 454 big block Chevy, th400, and 4.10 gear
Honorable mention:
1989 Jeep Comanche 2wd 177hp 4.0/5spd. Would go 15.2-15.5 in the 1/4
Sorry, but a Corvette is not part of the muscle/pony cars. Yes, TPI C4's, 1989 ZR1's, and Callaway twin-turbo cars were fast. However, I have an old magazine road test from 1987, where the GNX embarrassed the Chevy boys who showed up with a twin turbo Callaway hoping to save face
BUDDY YOUR LIST NAILED IT!!!!!!😎👍🏁🏁🏁🏁🏁
Good list!
To think my Mazda 3 turbo would spank every car in this video is crazy.
LMAO!!!!
If you could classify a video as a giant typo, this would be it.
Well, at least he tried. Great video. ❤
4:00 thats a Monte Carlo
Truly, this idiot doesn't know his cars, like a couple cars are from the 70's
There were no muscle cars of the 80's. The GNX was the closest but my 2016 Genisis 3.8L V6 had more horse power and was 20mph faster.
I had a vette!!!!!!
1981 baby blue chevette!!
Corvettes were slow compared to the Buick and mustang's...ford thunder bird made very few , almost no one had them with the turbos
WHY IS THE 5.0 A 2.3
In '93 I bought an '86 Lebaron GTS Turbo sedan for $1,500 (Yes, back then used cars were relatively cheap) that had a Shelby head, valve cover & odd exhaust manifold from a kid who was attending a Mopar technician school. He said it was originally a Chrysler mule assigned to the Chelsea Michigan test center. It had 68k miles, a digital dash including the speedometer. One day I decided to see what it could do top end on I-275. I went over the 110 mph readout to where the speedo showed 3 blinking dashes & it was still picking up momentum. Talk about a sleeper & it was a ball to drive. Fun car & very underrated.
Hey thanks for sharing! I remember the Lebaron convertible from the 80's. That was a nice looking car!
I agree & also owned a '90 loaded red LeBaron convertible. Nice car with no major issues.
442 means 400 4 barrel duel exhaust list is backwards and 70s cars weren’t built in the 80s
Forgot the 83-84 Cutlass Calais Hurst Olds !!??
The SS Monte Carlo only came with one engine 305 never came with a 5.7
89 turbo trans am ? 1/4 in 13.5....Pontiac lied saying it had 250 HP, actually it was closer to 300 HP..
Yep, Pontiac only had chevy engines for their "performance model" firebirds. When they wanted a special 'all out' performance version they went to Buick for their 3.8 Turbo Regal engines. But they had to use the 3.0 liter heads because the engine wouldn't fit without changing out the heads.
Tell me more about that monte carlo with the 5.7 engine.
"Muscles cars of the 80's". That's the biggest oxymoron that I ever heard. The 80's killed the Muscle car era. Comparing the 80's Camaro, Mustang, Charger and Corvette with their ancestors is just a disgrace.
What a ridiculous article. Most cars don't even show cars from the 80's and the engines are mostly wrong.
I guess the Road Runner kinda counts last year was 1980 with a 318 .
I had one.
Muscle in the 80”s not!
Shelby Chargers,and Omni pretty much that’s all Mopar had .
Since Chrysler was in trouble
I think the idea also is that their production runs might have ended at the beginning of the 80's, say '80, '81 or '82 but people purchased them, modified them and continued to drive them throughout the 1980's.
Don't forget the dodge Daytona that was in the 80s. My dad had one and it blew the doors off the dodge shebly charger. I'm a huge Mopar freak, but the shebly charger wasn't all that. I drove one before, yeah it was a fun car to drive but I wasn't impressed with the performance since it was a shebly it should have had better.
muscle cars are mid sized cars with big block truck or full size cars engine, mustangs, camaros and firebirds are pony cars, the buick and monte would have been muscle cars with a big block engine
Bro.... Please do your homework. You mixed apples with oranges.
What a ridiculous review!
What is this list? Half the car is in the video aren’t even from the 80s.
Why did you show a Ford engine while talking about the IROC?
Turned the video off immediately when the file photo of Ford's 5.0 showed up while describing the IROC Camaro.
Dude, do your homework. Cutlass and Plymouth you showed are 68-72 models not 80s.
The Muscle Cars of the 70's were better
Not sure why the hell they called it the screaming chicken back in the late 70's when its a fucking Phoenix, not no fucking screaming chicken. Hence the name, FIREBIRD, the only bird in history to be covered in fire 🔥 was the Phoenix. Smh screaming chicken 🐔🍗 🤦🏽♂️
Back to Editing Room ..!
Bad video information & Cars wrong year ..!
🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔 🤔
Not all 80's Muscle-cars, a-lot of awesome early 70's Muscle-cars.
and by the way, if it has 4-doors it's categorised as a Sports-Sedan.
And if it doesn't have a back seat, then it's a Sports-Car.
The Corvette is America's No.1 Sports-Car. 👍
Why are you showing 2nd gen Trans Am's? Those were primarily 70's bodies until 81', You need to be showing the 3rd gen body which was made between 82'-92' especially the GTA "similar features to the IROC" made between 87'-92'. Very disappointed as I own one...
Was this a a joke they showed the Monte Carlo for the Buick Grand national😮
I thought that Chevrolet always represented the Corvette as the sportscar and the Camaro held the Muscle car title. But anyways this video is everywhere with the years.
thats mostly accurate. in the 60s at least, Camaro/Firebird/Mustang/Challenger/Javelin would be a "Pony Car", Chevelle/GTO/442/Charger/Torino a "Muscle car". Corvette was the only real major American "Sports Car" unless you consider the Thunderbird(designed by Ford to compete with Corvette) and/or Shelby Cobra, which was semi-American but built in tiny numbers
@@turbodeigo In the 60's Chevelle/GTO/442/Charger/Torino were called Super Cars.
Muscle Cars in the Eighties 😂
Am i trippin or did he show a ford engine for a iroc z?