F1 livestream with Peter Windsor
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июл 2024
- We're going live, taking your questions and comments, in the aftermath of a frenetic Austrian GP. Who was at fault when Max Verstappen and Lando Norris collided at turn 3? And what about George Russell's drive through the debris to secure his second career win? Oscar Piastri and Carlos Sainz also stepped on to the podium - but Sir Lewis Hamilton could finish only P4. What does this mean for the British GP at Silverstone? All three British drivers will be eyeing-up their home race - and there's a very good chance that McLaren-Mercedes will again take it to the reigning champions. There's lots to talk about and lots to question so join Peter's latest livestream on RUclips chat this Tuesday, July 02, at 14:00 CET.
With thanks to Jetcraft, the world's largest supplier of executive aircraft
jetcraft.com
To OEM Exclusive, passionate suppliers of rare OEM parts for exotic and high-performance vehicles
And to TrackNinja, a lap-timer and data app designed to help users improve their on-track car and driver performance through analysis and an innovative Data Garage. You can download a lite version of TrackNinja for free; the fully-loaded version is US$9.99 pcm or $99.99 yearly
Image: Red Bull
Visit our new Podcast channel - Short Corners - on Spotify, Google Podcasts and Amazon Music
Alpinestars:
alpinestars.com
Follow Peter on X and Insta: @peterdwindsor
We support the Race Against Dementia:
raceagainstdementia.com
#STANDWITHUKRAINE
Nick: you're with us always 
Спорт
If it was Lando defending and Max attacking everybody(I actually mean 90% Brits) would say that Max was divebombing and Lando is a master in defense👍😂
Lanbo is junk.. britons are too
And 100% of Dutch people will say Max can do nothing wrong.
@@davidbrown8517 Hi! Dutchman here, both wrong. But 1 is significantly more immature than the other.
That's toxic ppl for u. Most new fans who are also football fans
@@davidbrown8517love max and lando let's go racing
The FIA is an odd organization. Since when are they penalizing drivers based on consequence rather than the action itself ? Max made contact, ok fair enough he got a penalty. But how can Lando's actions in Spain where he forced another driver off the track at high speed, and the late divebombs also forcing another driver off the track (Hulkenberg got a 10sec penalty for that in the sprint btw.), were not even investigated ? And the of course you read the comments from one of the weekend's stewards (Herbert) and it starts to make sense. He was literally implying that Max crashed on purpose and he bases his decision on his personal opinions of the drivers. Saying that Lando shouldn't move to avoid contact because that's how you beat Max. Quote "I like competition because I think it is a very important part of racing. But I sometimes don’t like it when he gets to the point that you are actually forcing a car off the circuit. That is not what it is all about." Well if mr Herbert doesn't like someone forced off the circuit, can he please explain why Lando didn't get investigated when he forced Max off in Spain and Austria ? The overreaction to this racing incident of simple wheel contact has been overblown beyond belief. And it's only gonna get worse the upcoming weekend. F1 media is gonna reach a new level of insufferable.
Problem with FIA, is that is full of British guy´s. There is no impartiality.
@@pedroferrr1412 I don't even care if all the stewards are British if they do a proper job, most of the staff in F1 are British i have 0 problems with that. The only British aspect surrounding F1 that gets on my nerves is the media. What they are doing at the moment with this completely normal racing incident that happens every race, is mind blowing. At the same time they turn a complete blind eye to Landos actions in the past few weeks. Not only did they not have a problem with Lando forcing Max off the road in Spain, they actually cheered it on as it is good hard racing. A lot of the articles i see coming out of these mainstream outlets look like they have been written in advance and kept in the drafts. Seems like they have been waiting for the slightest incident involving Max to unleash yet another wave of toxic journalism. They probably can't believe their luck since it happened just before Silverstone. They will keep fanning this flame all the way to the weekend, and on the weekend itself ? Oh boy i can hear it already...😀
@edv1832, spot on!
@@pedroferrr1412 don’t talk rubbish. There are 4 Stewards at every Grand Prix and usually all four from different countries. Herbert was the only Brit out of the 4 in Austria.
Remember when FIA and Red bull "came to an agreement" for RBs cost cap breach punishment? Or when Masi negotiate with J. Wheatley juring jeddah 2021 for what max penalty should be ? Imagine a sport where you get to negotiate your punishment for breaking the rules. FIA have been in bed with Red bull for a long time now
Maybe it's just me, but I think people are making entirely too big a deal of the Lando and Max incodent.
I've noticed there's plenty of people who are just using this incident as an excuse to cry foul about Max's previous battles.
Like they did with the Horner vs Jos drama. F1 pundits are bored of Max winning everything for years they gotta dig deep for content
Indeed.
Nope Its about the precedent and the future to come. 2 people know how to race Max Lewis and a greater extent Charles. Charles because he has raced him all his life in Kart.Lewis because he is wiley, plus Alonso because he has that wheel to wheel talent.
Agree.
Thank God for you, Peter. Literally the only place I can hear a reasonable take on controversial races instead of "Max is the devil".
Thank you Peter for the wonderful podcasts, i really appreciate your insights for the sport that we love
To all the guys, saying that Max is like Schumacher, they are forgetting about Senna with Prost.
Ah yes, so because someone drove like this 30 years ago it makes it ok 😂😂😂
Michael was like Senna, shunt after shunt. I get the feeling of hard race but the best drivers knew that crash is the low point. Max unfortunately always come with an answer why the fault is on the other side. And he has problems with everyone. And if we see Lando, Leclerc, Bottas, Sainz, Lewis, Vettel, Webber, Ricciardo. All of them tried very hard to avoid the crash or touch but not really damaged the car. To crash you need mostly 2 parts. Even if you do everything you can yo avoid it. And there is those who dont! Thats Max
I just watched a "highlights" reel on RUclips, and believe me, Max is nowhere near as "dirty" as MSC.
@@sbGOM agree thx
I dont see the big deal in this. I personally liked the battle! Way better then the standard "let him pass".
Yes not kindergarten
Good on you Peter THANK YOU for keeping it real!
I'm posting everywhere watch Peter Windsor's analysis of Austria he is the only one that got it wright.
You said it yourselfs, finally we have something to watch and you know why because of MAX and he is right he had the inside line, there was space on the left and Norris didn’t move. Max said he didn't move under breaking. Do we want to see good and fun racing or constantly being confused by inconsequent ruling of race killing rules. Actually Norris drove Max of the track as well some rounds earlier and Max moved out of the way and that's why there was no collision, I don't hear people saying anything about that exactly the same thing though. I think the English press got it wrong this time I'm sorry you're just talking like anybody does except Peter Windsor and I think Because the polarization of this discussion will do more harm to the sport and make drama's where there are not supposed to be any drama's. like everybody wants to say this friendship between Norris and Max is over ect ect, and I don't know if you read or heard the English press (I don't want to call names) they where just waiting for this moment and are slaughtering Max right now THAT'S NOT GOOD FOR THE SPORT and not what Max is doing and if Norris doesn't want to be friends with Max anymore then he is childish, They are the best things in F1 right now LET'S ENJOY.
And Peter I love your show good luck with all your endeavours, hope to meet you one day.
Greetings from Haje.
I’m glad we were watching the same race Mr. Windsor. Totally agree with your analysis. Max’s defense was absolutely beautiful to watch.
Presumably the new breed of football/F1 fans will boo Max at Silverstone and Lando will be booed at Zandvoort.
Yes prost was booed at brasil so is not knew and I love senna
The Moss and Hawthorne comment made me think of Gilles and Jody!
I did not know J. Herbert was part of the stewards this weekend and i will not say he is unfair in his judgements. Here comes the big BUT In the past i noticed some desicions that seem a bit off to me - one of them was the Russel-Alonso Australia decision
Lets race like in the days of old. Thanks Max
There is no talent in DRS
F1 media has turned into TMZ.
I think Piastri will cause Lando more headaches than Max going forward. As soon as Piastri manages his tyre degradation, he'll be right up there in the mix of things.
Yeah no.
Lando was crushing Russel and Piastri finished behind him.
@@tomsoyer5639crushing Russell? Mclaren are the faster car than Mercedes lol
Its easier said than done.
@@utkarshtyagi10 Exactly.
Maybe banning British stewards - or limiting it to a maximum of just one - and creating a mix of different nationalities, could be part of the solution of these weird type of decisions.
Stewards come from all over the world. There are more international stewards than British ones
@@lekudos And so it should be. F1 is still way too much influenced by British chauvinism.
@@Wuppie62 you’re literally saying two opposite things at once. British stewards are in a very small minority of stewards even though everyone thinks they’re everywhere.
@@lekudos
There should be only 1 per nationality IMHO.
Saw a great documentary on Collins and Hawthorn recently. Incredibly tragic and inspiring story.
Great livestream, thanks.
Hi Peter, congrats for ...everything!!! A question: Don't you think that if Lando was thinking about an undercut (right after that turn) he should never put the car beside Max's car, and even worse to get ahead? What was he thinking?
So great to hear you do a frame to frame analysis.
Could you also check Lando on boards from the beginning of the race. You see Lando way further to the left in that corner.
It was pretty clear from the overhead that there was a definite change in direction at around 70m. The lead car was edging to the centre, then suddenly it was moving to the left hand edge. There was no kink in the track at that point.
Love how Peter handles the haters of certain drivers and over the top fanboys, you guys got schooled.
Fan of the 20 on the grid
Regarding the friendship, or any comments: I'm sure Max will take up the bat for any driver that is regarded wrongly in his POV. Lando may be surprised.
Lando defended the Russian driver few years back on his livestream
Hi Peter, Mercedes have improved for sure, but what are their weakness that still exists?
They have foot work cameras in F2 sometimes. So it can't be hard.
My Dechambeau bag:
D- Hogan
3W- Snead
3i- Nicklaus
4i- Trevino
5i- Els
6i- Watson
7i- Miller
8i- Dechambeau
9i- Faldo
PW- M. Norman
GW- Langer
SW- D. Johnson
LW- Mickelson
P- Woods
I watched at the time and they warned him that Lando was at risk but I don't think he knew Lando was over and obviously Max was a bit busy and it was not a sure thing. And there is no assurance that Max could keep up afterwards. So it is understandable that he carried on with strong defense.
Regarding the pitstops, well, there's no arguing Sir Frank anymore, rest his soul. I for one love the 2sec pitstops, but could understand a change of rules.
No Peter, you off on this one. The replays say quite alot. And Ant's analysis is quite revealing.
Naw, he’s dead on. Watch Maxs onboard
Ant who?
I agree and think AD is a great analyst. I also love PW. But disagree on this one.
@@nodekapunk As I said. A.D. did a full analysis of the incident. And he covered all views. And he came to a different conclusion.
Just before the race they showed the McLaren frontwing. It has a serated edge. Ask Lewis and Perez, they both had damage from Oscar.
I think that is a misrepresentation of what Stella was referring to regarding 2021. I took what he was saying as bring a general point that some, Verstappen in particular, has always pushed 'the acceptable driving practices' boundaries, and that if such practices are not jumped on then those behaviours persist. Ie, it was general, not specific.
"What's going on", you say.. I think its hate because they are jealous.
Using your logic, what would Lando do if max was given a time penalty laps before for turning under braking??
Interesting logic say he most probably crash into Max maybe 🤪
Excellent content, Peter! I live in the States and am relatively new to F1 and really enjoy listening to your stories and thoughts on things. It honestly feels like getting a “behind the scenes” tour of what is really going on with the cars/drivers on track (ie, recognizing how max took turns 7/8 at Austria). The eye for detail and nuance you have when explaining F1 racing, combined with your detailed knowledge of the history of the sport, both combine to provide truly enjoyable content to a new F1 consumer such as myself. Not to mention the superb photos. Subscribed for sure.
Welcome.
Cheers 👍 👍👍
Longing for the “good old days” in F1 re ‘let them race’ that’s fine…. Heck let them race like nascar if you like but as long as rules are in place it’s more important to keep with the rules than anyone’s personal preference
Mr Peter I noticed that you do not often talk about the F1 period of the Michael Schumacher , do you appreciate the driver, love to hear your opinion
I can understand that the most of the followers would be on the side of what Peter is saying, it makes sense. But, not understanding the simple truth that it's Max and that he never changed and will never change is beyond me. Hard racing - yes, but not dirty. And, what happed in Austria will happen again, because he can not comprehend that sometimes, even the best have to yield.
Please get a Tillet seat
The one and only challenge to Max is still Lulu, no doubt about that.
Peter Windsor for FIA-president..
THIS DEFENCE THING IS ABSURD, HOW CAN YOU DEFEND WITH SOMETHING FRAGILE. IF DEFENCE IS GOOD WHAT ABOUT ATTACK? DEFENCE GOES TOGETHER WITH ATTACK.
Im with Jolyon Palmer on this one .
With Peter
Poms nitch thats what thay do 😅
No matter how pathetic the rules are(I don't like them either) but they are the rules. You can't just say no wrong was done just because you don't agree with the rules.
Its called an opinion and if you don't agree that's your opinion we can say whatever we want 😛
@catfish_joe5068 yes rules true but didn't know Spain grass part of the race track be accident their if max turned on the road
Lewis drove fantastically…back to his very best
Sta: 48:48 1:09:07
Per: 49:28
Misc: 41:13 41:49 55:20 1:02:58 1:03:31 1:08:42
Pet: 41:13? 55:25 ****1:03:46**** 1:09:33
7:48 17:55 40:45 43:23 44:26 45:02 48:03 49:20 50:35 54:17 56:33 57:07 58:35 1:01:38 1:08:08 1:11:33 1:11:41 1:12:32 1:13:55 1:30:20 1:31:13 1:32:56 1:36:33 1:36:49 1:40:34 1:42:24 1:46:34 1:50:35 1:51:39 1:54:27 1:55:18 1:57:10 2:00:30 2:05:10 2:07:30 2:08:20 2:09:11 2:12:15 2:12:38
Continue: 1:40:25
SO WE ALL AGREE IF MAX KNEW THAT LANDO 5sec PENALTY. HE WOULD HAVE NOT BLOCKED LANDO IS THAT SO?
Nope we don't agree stop shouting word in our mouths
@@catfish_joe5068✅️
Hadn't tuned in for many years but DRS seemed too artificial, complex, contrived and probably unnecessary from the watching the first race in many years, my two penneth.
Musso Collins hawthorn RIP
The stewards’ verdict read:
“Car 1 [Verstappen] was approaching Turn 3 with Car 4 [Norris] alongside on his left. Before turning in, the driver of Car 1 moved to the left, causing a collision with Car 4. The Stewards determine that the driver of Car 1 was predominantly at fault and therefore impose the above mentioned penalty in line with precedents.”
Max received two points on his super license, along with the 10 second time penalty, which is reasonable and puts an end to the matter, as far as punishment. Not being able to take responsibility is the only outstanding issue. What type of man can't take responsibility for his actions? If the decision was wrong, then why wouldn't you challenge it? A person of substance would not allow injustice to stand.
O now all fans of stewards decision all of a sudden
@@degeautdfanfirst Hardly! Subjectively, he should have been disqualified. Objectively, the stewards gave a reasonable penalty. As they did for Lewis.
Peter Thanks for a great show always. However; don't you realize that if you promote Max's driving style then we will have many more incidents. Moving more than once in the braking zone simply should not be allowed. All the other drivers are complying with this rule, besides Max. So technically he has an unfair advantage. Stella is correct in saying that if not punished accordingly, then this will continue.
May I say that Max races in a style that could be called "Machiavellian?" He is at the top and he intends to stay there.
😂😂 Brits panic when there's hard racing. You want drivers to say, "Fancy a pass, m8? Righto, on you go." Gay.
Open DRS dont bin it
Lando, will never win a championship, IMO, makes to much errors. Piastri will win!
I think this obsession with DRS came about after Alonso sat behind Kubica for 20 laps or so in Abu Dhabi and hence allowed vettel to take the championship. Ofcourse those cars were different from today.
So yeah there's actually a quick solution here. Bugger off the DRS and keep the cars big, what would be even better is to enforce 2022 regulations again but sadly only one team figured those rules out.
Just can't win haha but I must say when formula becomes a sport of spoon feeding OVERTAKES, then WHERE'S THE OVERTAKE, WHERE'S THE EXCITEMENT.😂
They need to be careful here because they could ruin the sport.
It was Vitaly Petrov
@@Mike.Mendes that's it
Scrap DRS!!!
This whole entire incident is agitating to say the least. The fact that someone can hit someone from behind and not be found at fault is sheer blasphemy! Go ahead and tell me how Max should have avoided being hit from behind ? Even in daily driving the driver that hits another from behind is always at fault for failure to follow at a safe distance or, failure to control your vehicle!
I love F1. Jim Clark was the best ever. I have no dog in the fight. I don't support any driver or team. I appreciate talent and skill. I also don't think that Ferarri should be treated differently to the other teams.If Max turned when there was the dive bomb from Lando this discussion wouldn't be being had. If Lando had been given his penulty for track limits; ditto. Max didn't turn into Lando. Going back now it's Lando who turned right into Max's wheel. Last race Lando pushed Max onto the grass. I don't understand nationalism in motorsport. Pommies are getting their knickers in a knot. Max didn't deserve a penulty. Simple. All I want is great racing. People make mistakes but the greats make very few. I'm not sure that Lando has what it takes to be WC.
Sky witchunt of max is disappointing racing incident 24 races and expect not Too collide.
Totally agree about DRS Peter. Excellent analysis!
Saying it for 2 years obviously Peter for longer he notice before I would obviously
Lots of respect for Peter but the no need of DRS is completely and utterly nonsense. We might hate DRS but with these cars and the huge downforce they create DRS is absolutely necessary. Brother Perez ( faster car ) couldn't pass Alonso even with DRS who was on a much slower car on the long straight in Brazil 2023.
This guy always finds a way to talk shit about Alonso even when someone else like Andrea Stella who was in fact Alonso's race engineer at Ferrari talks shit but Petey here blames Alonso for that so go figure 🙄
What?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 geez mate calm down he has nothing but respect for Alonso, your delusional!!!
I think there are more people supporting Max because you have an "unbiased" view on the incident. The nuances of your analysis is being lost unfortunately as people breathlessly race to support Max and criticise Lando.
We all know you have a view regarding drivers on the inside hence your support for Lewis's move on Max at Silverstone in 2021 when you were out of step with other pundits. This might be an inconvenient truth for your new fans 😊. Don't agree with you this time and didn't agree with your analysis then. But still love your opinions and analysis.
It's very simple and a piss poor tactic at best, but they are using the journalists to attack Max because they know they can't beat him on an equal playing field. Max is Skywalker if I must say. Journalists love it and have always known to take things out of context and blow everything out proportion purely for ratings and sadly the monkey public chew it up. It just feeds on itself. Max just needs to do what he has been doing and crush the whole lot of them.
To be emperor, you must rule with an iron fist.
So now Alonso broke AM team huh Petey ? Geez whats wrong with you ? why you hate Fernando so much ? and what's with all that shit talking about Flavio ? I tell you what , he was a real team principal and not a wannabe like you who coudn't do that american team or whatever name you gave it and failed miserably 😄
My problem with the Austrian GP was Max's 3 moves under braking and the glacial response of the stewards. I disagree with Peter that Max was right on the limit. 2/3 moves were over and where not noted by the stewards. Then the track limits issue for Lando. Why did we not know that while the race was going on. Just crazy to me.
With that said, Lamdo's collision was definitely avoidable and clumsy. Like Peter said, he should have just waited to turn in. Max may be at fault, but Lando could have played his cards better.
Yeah like max did move slightly left, idk if he was still braking by that point, but all drivers do slightly turn left before they make the corner to open it up that is common practice. And how was max suppose to know lando would dive bomb and be right there when he did that? That’s the issue with divebombing. Not that you can’t divebomb but you can’t expect the car In front to react perfectly. But the amount of hate max is getting to me is absurd and just shows how bias and hateful the media is towards non British drivers. Guy makes one little move and all of a sudden he’s an immature driver who is dangerous and should be penalized to the harshest extent? Absolute absurdity. And Peter is correct. This is racing. I’d rather have this than a race where you have to pull over to the side slow down and let the guy pass you cus god forbid you try and defend. Everyone hating on max for 21 yet that was probably the most exciting season since maybe 98 when Schumacher and haikkonen were going at it. Imagine Brazil 21 max just sits there and let’s Hamilton pass. People would t even watch the sport anymore if that’s what we got. What this really is is British fans and max haters being upset that their idols are losing so let’s try and pull every trick out of the basket to nerf this guy.
You know that moving under braking was taken out of the rulebook in 2017? It is not illegal by definition and what Max did here was not comparable to the situations in 2016 with Kimi and Seb, which situations led to the rule in 2016. In those situation Max blocked them, which was dangerous in my opinion. Apparently the stewards did not find his driving erratically in Austria.
@@weignerleigner3037 while I understand that that is racing, I also think doing something that is against the rules, at least by the letter but perhaps not by the spirit, Three times is at least worthy of note by the stewards. Regardless of whatever they decide, Max should at least be notified that they're looking at it. I'm not necessarily advocating for the decision to be different, but there needs to be more clarity.
Also, ultimately like I said, I really don't think Max deserves anywhere near the amount of blame he's getting and Lando had ample opportunity to make a cleaner move. For the record, his dive bomb was also stupid.
@@zendel7030 Yes, they got rid of the rule that was made because of Max's tactics, however, the current language, while less specific and gives the stewards more latitude, is far too vague. Again, my whole point is that the stewards said nothing which is the problem. I don't really have an issue with the outcome, Max not getting a penalty, but clearly an incident like this should fall under consideration, and then be analyzed contextually. Perhaps the decision cannot be made quickly enough during the race, but a notice for investigation definitely could have been and should have been in my opinion.
Classy insights.
it was hard racing. Lando needed to make cleaner passes. Max is the king of hitting wheel on wheel. Its his go to - hitting flat wheel on flat wheel to bump others off so the car aero doesn't get touched. I've never seen anyone be able to do it like he does, i first noticed it that Baku race where him and Dan crashed, Max that whole race was doing it to anyone near him. Hes not pulled it out often since those early days but its still part of his arsenal. Lando was dive bombing to pass at turn 2 instead of waiting till turn three...every lap it was desperate and it ended in tears. Theyre both at fault for not racing cleaner.
As a Dutch I am very to hear you and explain your honest view and also giving Max a positive motivation how he did it. Thank you.
Thanks Peter, I still think this was a racing incident and Lando should have outsmarted Max and overtaken him. I think this was the last option to crash. If he played the patient game he would have got him. His comments after the race were kind of childish... this sport is unforgivable. Race on !!!
Landos car was not quicker than the RB20, until the last pitstop Max was making the gap bigger and bigger up to 8 seconds. After the pitstop Lando had new mediums and Max had used mediums and importantly Max through driver error locked up after 2 corners and damaged his tyre, this gave Lando a situational advantage and that was the only way he was able to catch the faster car.
You can see in the sprint race how Maxs car was the faster car when Lando overtook with DRS and then Max was actually able to retake the position without DRS due to Lando not covering the inside line sure but for Maxs car to be there means it was just as quick but without DRS that Lando had.
Therefore the way to overtake Max was to break very late as this is where the tyre advantage would be most effective.
Max defended like he would defend against an AI opponent in a simulation, he did move under breaking twice, reacting to Landos move, he did turn the wheel left to make sure there wasnt a cars width and then he tried to force Lando onto the grass despite doing so in an unsafe car with traffic coming quickly from behind, very dangerous and petty.
I dont think you realize how much time Max spends in his simulator, his defending was petty simulator defence, his remarks have also made it clear that he would rather crash than give up 1st place.
The nail in the coffin is that Max didnt turn right for the right handed corner, he was lost in his obsession to keep 1st place and he needs to grow up a bit.
The reason theres so much criticism is because Redbull kept telling him that he was entitled to everything and that he was driving perfectly, Redbull will destroy his confidence by being ego massagers rather than telling him the reality. Its far more of wanting Max to be on the right track for the future rather than him being disliked.
What about Lando torpedoing himself straight ahead through that corner on Max' inside earlier? That was almost a succesful attemp at murdering the RB20..
@@Wuppie62 that was clearly a lockup that cost Lando a bunch of time, Im not saying it was a great move but without a lockup it mightve been a clean pass, you can understand why he was trying to outbreak Max there as his team had told him much earlier on that Max only had used mediums
@@cattycats4
So you admit it was Lando's fault. He was way too opportunistic/optimistic braking that hard, that late, with that higher DRS speed coming from that far.
@@TheThirstyOtter I totally agree with Peter about DRS
Ok. So I have a different view on the Max v Lando incident. I'm not biassed. It's just my opinion.
I find it so very interesting that because you have a different view from many other pundits, you are now being described as unbiased and those with an opposite view are described as biassed. I don't think you are biassed at all PW. My opinion is different and just happens to align with other experts' views.
In my view Max's trajectory was away from the apex with the intent of squeezing Lando. He squeezed him too much, and there was a collision. At the end of the day, the stewards thought he caused the collision. I don't have a problem with that.
Now, has this been blown out of proportion? Yes. Could Lando have tried something else? Yes. Was his reaction totally OTT? Absolutely. Do I hate all this polarisation? Yes.
Whitmarshs talent is leading competitive teams to mediocrity
DRS. should be free to be used, when the driver want, or need!
Muw Noris looser divebomber
A bit shocked that Peter is disputing what Andrea Stella said. What is AS if not a truth sayer? Is he not the image of a perfectly honest and technically profound person and Team leader??? Shocking
at some point someone needed to stand up against the bully, this is the beginning of real F1 racing , GO LANDO!!!!!!
I'm 100 % with J. Palmer on this !
Stella was right !
Very easy to be hypocritical and so keep your income just like Cameron.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The entire field (with the exception of Max and perhaps a few others) have had no issue whatsoever racing hard with DRS. This is very simple, and I’m disappointed to hear Peter twisting himself into knots trying to justify Max’s behavior. Max moved to the left under braking when he saw Lando on the outside. Then, he squeezed Lando nearly off the track on the right on the exit of the corner. Pure immaturity and petulance. Andrea Stella is correct.
Max was dirty, Peter. The same kind of dirty he was in ‘21. The fact that you’ve chosen to take the opposite stance is surprising.
It isn’t hard racing to move under braking. It isn’t hard racing to push your opponent onto the grass after touching.
It’s childish.
Also, having rules that protect cars on the outside is good. Or else you’d ALWAYS take the inside and push them wide.
Edit:
Saying that max isn’t dirty because other drivers have been dirtier is a really bad argument.
Nobody care what Senna/Schumacher did to win their titles.
Schumacher got disqualified in a season for being dirty.
Times have changed in that nobody likes bullies anymore and the way you’re letting max off the hook you’re enabling abusive behaviour.
Jeddah! Imola! Brazil! Abu Dhabi!
Cmon Peter!
I enjoy your videos, but you are a selfcentered hypocrite. You only care about your own opinion (or people from decades ago). You think it's bad when drivers don't know history from the 50's and 60's although it's totally irrelevant to them, but you yourself can't be bothered to stay informed of what is going nowadays on Skysports or in "Drive to Survive". Also, you are wrong about DRS. Watching F1 in the 70's, 80's and 90's was extremely boring, except for the year when they had afterburner.
Hi Peter, Mercedes have improved for sure, but what are their weakness that still exists?
Hi Peter, Mercedes have improved for sure, but what are their weakness that still exists?
Hi Peter, Mercedes have improved for sure, but what are their weakness that still exists?
Hi Peter, Mercedes have improved for sure, but what are their weakness that still exists?