Thanks - too much "real life" getting in the way, not to mention data gathering, etc. I'm endeavoring to put out more content like this more regularly.
Fortunately, much of the next video is done because it was originally part of this one - it was just too long, and also too much to take in. I just need to augment, redo voiceover, etc. to get it out.
Once again, great video man. Good to see you still sharing the knowledge in a format that most people can understand. Keep up the great work my friend.
@@TwoMinutesToTarget Life just gets in the way. Work life and remodeling my future retirement cabin in the mountains. Only time I have for shooting the last 2 years is 1 mile benchrest and 1k yd benchrest....which is just trigger time for 1 mile benchrest.
Thanks - this was originally a longer video with different content at the end, but it was too much trying to get squeezed into a single title. I've got some cool data that will be coming up in the next in the series.
If you're asking about interference fit, there are a lot of opinions on this. My personal opinion is that the more interference you induce (e.g. by using a smaller bushing), the larger the impact from the variances induced by other factors (friction in the neck, neck thickness, brass properties).
Informative, thank you. I can look at curves all day! Btw, Siewert may serve his pocket well, by rewriting his excellent book for bubbas to understand. His tack about dispersion being highly affected by the "rate of change of anguler velocity ex the muzzle"....sticks with me.
I'm an ex-NASA Space Shuttle engineer, and much (most?) of the content of the book went over my head. Still, even just the parts I could grasp were well worth wading through the rest. I actually I have two copies of the book - one is marked up heavily with a highlighter, the other intact. BTW, I've asked for Jeff Siewert's insights as to why the example I used of Retumbo has effectively the same pressure curve early on as the much faster Reloder 19 - I sent him data and he will hopefully give some interesting info back. My current bet is that it's due to the higher fill that Retumbo yields (97%) vs. 88% for RL19 - less available volume at the beginning. We'll see.
Glad you are back.
Thanks - too much "real life" getting in the way, not to mention data gathering, etc. I'm endeavoring to put out more content like this more regularly.
Looking forward to this series
Fortunately, much of the next video is done because it was originally part of this one - it was just too long, and also too much to take in. I just need to augment, redo voiceover, etc. to get it out.
Once again, great video man. Good to see you still sharing the knowledge in a format that most people can understand. Keep up the great work my friend.
Thanks! I haven't run across you on the Hide very much - though my time there has been less as well - where have you been hiding? (no pun intended)
@@TwoMinutesToTarget Life just gets in the way. Work life and remodeling my future retirement cabin in the mountains. Only time I have for shooting the last 2 years is 1 mile benchrest and 1k yd benchrest....which is just trigger time for 1 mile benchrest.
Nice!!! Thanks!
Great video, Well done, Thank you!
Thanks - this was originally a longer video with different content at the end, but it was too much trying to get squeezed into a single title. I've got some cool data that will be coming up in the next in the series.
Great video.
Show us how you read and use your AMP press, please.
Coming in the next video :)
hi, is there an "ideal" bullet to case fit? aka .001 inch press? .oo2? etc, How much does this change with bullet dia.?
If you're asking about interference fit, there are a lot of opinions on this. My personal opinion is that the more interference you induce (e.g. by using a smaller bushing), the larger the impact from the variances induced by other factors (friction in the neck, neck thickness, brass properties).
Informative, thank you. I can look at curves all day! Btw, Siewert may serve his pocket well, by rewriting his excellent book for bubbas to understand. His tack about dispersion being highly affected by the "rate of change of anguler velocity ex the muzzle"....sticks with me.
I'm an ex-NASA Space Shuttle engineer, and much (most?) of the content of the book went over my head. Still, even just the parts I could grasp were well worth wading through the rest. I actually I have two copies of the book - one is marked up heavily with a highlighter, the other intact. BTW, I've asked for Jeff Siewert's insights as to why the example I used of Retumbo has effectively the same pressure curve early on as the much faster Reloder 19 - I sent him data and he will hopefully give some interesting info back. My current bet is that it's due to the higher fill that Retumbo yields (97%) vs. 88% for RL19 - less available volume at the beginning. We'll see.
@@TwoMinutesToTarget Agreed, he could do with the likes of us practical engineers toning down his nerdiness.....haha.
@@TwoMinutesToTarget I came across Siewert on a Hornady podcast, truly an expert and very humble guy.
Burn the same powder faster in a short fat case than a longer thinner one same bullet for instance a 300WSM to a 300 Win Mag?
Bro this is no where near 2 minutes… literally unwatchable
(Just kidding great video!)
You should have seen the original - was waaaay too long.
Please don’t fall into the trap that shorter videos are better.
Been a while since your last video.
Yes - been exceedingly busy with "real life". I have a few more that will come out in relatively short order.
They stopped updating GRT because Gordon passed.
I didn't know that - he certainly put together something special
@@TwoMinutesToTargetGRT is being updated. I am part of the powder/cartridge validation. An updated version should be out this Dec/Jan .
@@Nonedwdo you know if it will be available for mac