Vray vs Lumion which is better
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Architects always look for software that combine, Ease of use, speed, and
realistic renders to finish their projects, it is the last step of a hard and long process but it can be the most important one, it has to be perfect and it has to reflect reality so that the client would have a vivid idea about his project and how it will turn out to be in the end, some of the most known software for rendering are lumion and Vray so which one is better for rendering your projects?
inspirationtuts 3D Channel:
/ @inspirationtuts
inspirationTuts 2D Channel:
/ @inspirationtuts2d
Help me Create More Content:
/ inspirationtuts1
Facebook page
web.facebook.c...
2nd-year architecture student here. I have briefly both used both rendering software. While I agree Lumion is quicker to learn and operate, an issue not really mentioned is the system requirements of both softwares. Lumion requires a ton of RAM as well as a top-notch graphics card and screen resolution. If your laptop doesn't meet the requirements it can end up freezing when using Lumion. V-ray has lower system requirements hence is much less of a drain on your laptop’s performance.
How about Enscape ? Easy to learn and use so that no need to ask for help from 3dman ? Pro and old architect here.
Lumion is for people who also have active social life
Lumion is for people that play, vray is for people that work
ruclips.net/video/ZxWauEas_rw/видео.html
Best answer, I I didn't even watch the video. Got my answer.
@@pier77 In the middle of the presentation to client, client said.. " I dont like this type of finish, could you suggest me something else"
Lumion user : " owh, not a problem, I'll change it and you'll see the result on the fly.. "
Vray user : "hmm.. sure no problem, I'll show you my suggestion in another 3 month"
@@NBCNothingButCrap u really thought that comment was so good that you posted it multiple times
I do vray for 10 years and recently started using lumion for exterior projects and it takes me 4 hours from start to finish and two more hours for like 10 8k renderings. The quality is never even close to vray but it's really good enough for the time and effort spend. The thing I currently hate is that it gives you a wide angle as default and if you want to achieve a bit more orthographic angle like at least 60mm it treats the models and especially grass as if they're really far away and doesn't render them properly. I have to sacrifice the looks for that reason. Hopefully they fixed that in the 11th version
Thanks for the feedback.
Hi can u teach me 3ds max
you cant compare the two. Not by a mile. A better comparison would be Lumion vs Twinmotion.
If you want to compare Vray you have to compare other ray tracers like Corona.
I disagree. I use 3ds max to create my models but I transfer my models to Lumion. Fast, easy and high quality renders. Obviously people have different opinions. Vray, Corona, Twinmotion and Lumion are all good but my workflow is 3ds max to lumion to After Effects. It works for me great. Greetings.
Exactly
@@salomerobles8495 One is a raytracer, the other one is a realtime application. Apples and oranges. You can't compare the when they don't use the same methods of rendering. Different oppinions on workflow etc. are irrelevant.
@@salomerobles8495 LOL, what do you mean?
I've been working with render engines for the past 12 years. They got easier and easier to use.
In my opinion it's no use investing in a complicated software. Lumion will be photorealistic in 1-5 years. So atm I'm using lumion mostly as I post process everything in photoshop for a long time anyway.
In the middle of the presentation to client, client said.. " I dont like this type of finish, could you suggest me something else"
Lumion user : " owh, not a problem, I'll change it and you'll see the result on the fly.. "
Vray user : "hmm.. sure no problem, I'll show you my suggestion in another 3 month"
hhhhhh so true
why so long, LOLs
the good thing about Vray is that the Hardware recommendation is more wallet friendly than Lumion.
))))) true) well, not 3 month but feeling like that much)
@@etibarhuseynli1174 Client : "why u need so long till 3 month??"
Vray user : "owh, as a vray user the thing that we care most is 'accurate shadow'. "
@@eddypitono4995 I agree with you. but...
Client : "why u need so long till 3 month??"
Vray user : " Its because we just have a computer running intel i3 cpu, onboard gpu and crt monitor. Sir.. dont forget my next payment claim because I already planned for party, PS5, iphone 13 Pro Max, upgrade & modify my car........ and some sex toys".
Vray : For people who working primarily on Still image and can benefit from the program even for minimum Computer Specs.
Lumion : For Archviz primarily making Architectural videos. Lumion is relatively more stable than Vray and have more friendly user interface. beware you have to spend decent amount of money for using Lumion since it demand high specs.
To me vray is the best realistic render. The problem is that it takes forever to render an image. U really need a powerful computer and I have a good one but then when u modify your image u have to wait forever for another render of your image. That is frustrating. And I am talking about images. Forget it if u want to render videos. Lumion is quite the opposite. Images and render are really fast and most important of all, Lumion is EASY TO USE AND MODIFY. The quality is really really good if u learn to manipulate your settings. I still use vray but Lumion is my top one. Greetings.
The best answer for all questions about rendering. I agree 100%.Thank you.
If I need a project less than a week i turn into lumion,If i have time id still use corona rather than Vray
Vray 5 is out and it has now real-time rendering and upgraded light setting. Always vray had better lighting than Lumion and now they make it even better, with real-time rendering. Vray is becoming good, and the last version (Vray5) is way better than Corona.
Totally agreed
Lumion : A3 size full render : 1 minutes / A1 Size full render : 5 minutes (Quality : 9/10)
Vray : A3 size full render : 2 hours - 4 hours / A1 Size Full render : 4 Hours - 1 Days (Quality 10/10)
Long time use Vray , just start move to Lumion 9. because Lumion is Champion for Productivity.
Thank you for the actual meaningful comment 👍
Its more liké 4/10 for lumion
@@jubaaitali2459 Then you should learn more. You can check in my playlist. Many video is from Lumion 8&9.. Good enaugh. Now is Lumion 11 & Soon with Lumion 12... with advantage Lumion had, Lumion can beat all software in market about PRODUCTIVITY + QUALITY also.
@@sureskillgroups Hi .am using vray 5 and lumion 11 and for me lumion suck in render for interior design.vray et way way more realistic
@@jubaaitali2459 Nope. I alway complete my ID rendering with Lumion. All is Excellent. I think you miss few part important there...
Both are great and tested but vray 5 now has a huge changes they have real-time render just like enscape and photoreal rendering with just a minimum requirement needed.
Lumion users prefer to make it to their child’s little league game.
Lumion is godlike for fast yet detailed visualization but you'll never win archviz competitions or get featured on architecture magazines with it. It's the "working employee" tool that gets shit done. No hustle for when boss asks for a change. Want physical accuracy for your godrays and your glass caustics? Get v-ray.
Corona is better than vray
Yes
the only missing thing in these softwares is my budget
One looks like a sims game the other like reality... these are not comparable
I still like Vray for interiors because of its accurate material rendering as for Lumion its great for environment & architectural renders
Vray or lumion
Me: Enscape
Twilight render 🤓
yo bro, really thankya. Big respect
very well explained. goodjob
Thanks a lot
vray is the most beautiful and best because it provides realistic and professional images with the best quality, you can control the material settings better and wider options in the settings and the size of the program is small and does not exceed 1GB and does not need high operating requirements
Thank you so much this helped a lot!!!! You saved my life
Both are good rendering software, just depends on the user. But somehow Time is very Important for Architects and Engineers, So lumion is the answer.
@SkyLine Architects thanks for the advice..here is your amount 1$. Enjoy
@@_Final_Boss hahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Amazing video..Lumion vs Twinmotion .. vray vs corona..
I like Lumion so much and think it's the best to me
Architects use Lumion or Twinmotion for in-house renders and videos, VRay like most raytracers is cheaper than Lumion but takes far more resources in terms of skills and time for every project, as well as investment in building / buying an object library, which is why it's used typically by professional rendering companies, rather than small-midsize archi firms.
v ray is on a completely different league in terms of rendering capabilities, interior or exterior. The only good thing about lumion is the fact that it's so easy to use. However, It'd be great if you could do a comparison between vray, arnold, octane, redshift, and cycles.
Good explanation, I enjoy the comparison while you are speaking .. I always use vray, and for me, to use vray is not that hard or complicated, it is just the people that do not have real intention to learn the vray workflow that's why they said that it is hard to learn.. Because even before when I was a beginner in vray and studying the vray with my own, fortunately I never felt that vray is complicated. 😁
Honestly, problem with vray is not for Master problem is about time render
Now am using both of them
Lumion for fast work (nowdeys all People care about the time more then realistc image)
Vray for portfo and passion
@@hichemslimani3409 You can also do fast render in vray if you want to.. I have a client before and he only gave me 3 days to model the project and render it with vray, fortunately I did it.. All you have to do is to manage ur time very well.. I don't think that people now care more about the time only, time is important there's no doubt about it, but quality is also important too.. If you will choose between fast but low quality output and longer time but high quality output , what will you choose? For sure, at the end of the day, people will still choose the great quality output
@@AFStudio2 do you think low quality raddience map is faster and enough quality ?
@@hichemslimani3409 I didn't say irradiance map is faster than lumion .. I only said that you can also do fast render in vray .. Render in lumion is faster, but in terms of quality, vray is better in making quality renders .. and you are also admitting that one, because you have said that you use lumion just for fast work and you use vray for portfolio , so it means, based on what you have said, you are aware that vray is better in creating quality and more realistic renders.. Additionally, irradiance map is not low quality, you can do high quality rendering using irradiance map, so why did you say the word "low quality irradiance map" when in fact you can make high quality renders using irradiance map?
@@AFStudio2 i mean low quality irradience for both of time and quality if its acceptable, like we can sacrifice Lumion qnd keep using only vray on irradience map very low quality (in case if client or smtg should be fast) Sorry english :D
All these comments show users who don't actually know how to use Vray. No Vray is not difficult, yes, set up is fast, results are infinity better and more customisable.
Lumion is for users who don't know what they're doing and want to play "vis artist"
Vray is for the people who Lumion users wish they could be.
Do you use Vray?
But trust me you should be use both of them
Vray for passion and huge portfolio
Lumion for client Who want to get project to fast
Sorry main users Lumion its a joke if you call yourself am an 3d artist and you are using only Lumion (there is many vidéo 'how to learn Lumion in 1 hour' lol)
But its fine to use Lumion in some cases if needed
@@hichemslimani3409 when I don't have to use SketchUp I'll use Unreal. Equally quick workflow and better quality results. 🤙🏻
@@NolanMillerArt Good idea 1 Day i ll try it
We can convert 3ds to unreal (modélisation) and what about time render unreal compared to vray ??
@@hichemslimani3409 Vray is actually available for Unreal and you can do a direct important from 3dmax using Datasmith. Results for final render depends on your texture quality of course, but it's super nice.
of course Vray. way more better in quality. especially curve glass reflections.
The eye can compensate for the lack of a good software. you can use kerkythea( most of you wont know this lousy renderer even existed) but if you have good eye then you can still generate realistic images
grew up using 3dsmax vray the 1.5 sp1+ version(that was more than a decade ago whew time flies) this was the time when lumion was a little boy being bullied and laughed at in school for being a scrawny renderer. i can say that my lamest vray output is still better than any lumion still images render ive seen out there today. but im comfortable with the fact that quite seemingly,lumion has outperformed vray in most aspects of rendering now at least for the average user.
nonetheless to me. lumion is for weak homosexual boys. Vray is for Men, hey vray is catching up and the difference is it offers it for much lower price that will eventually throw lumion out of the market
Don't invest in anytNice tutorialng until you know what you're doing. Just your PC is fine for now.
Lumion is like Samsung, VRAY is like Apple. But the pricing seems the opposite.
Lol its opposite
Lumion is closed it seem Apple same as budget
No no no no
Lumion is like apple and Vray is like Samsung!!
Both Softwares are cool !!
twinmotion
Can i get maya animation render in any other software. If yes than which software can be use? Plz reply
yo bro, really thankya. Big respect
Lumion vs twinmotion ?
Twinmotion answers architects needs in a refined gaming engine.
Twinmotion does not regonize some modifiers of 3ds Max .... pffff I pass
Omg I wish I could make renders that look as good as the vray ones, but for now I guess I'll stick with lumion plus it's free for students
Free bro? I want to try ;
yes it's free
if only if you have university email
@@muhiyadinaweisyusuf9983 I got it to work with my high school email too
Can you give me some advice to improve at vray?
Thank you for explaining this thoroughly!
U BEST!!!
I hear Weta digital use lumion to render their movies.
Woah, great video mate!
Sa here
CAN ANYONE TELL ME HOW TO MAKE THAT CITY LANDSCAPE RENDERED FROM 6:45 !!???
what about trump and biden?
I don't think they use rendering software. But I could be wrong.
So lumion for noobs , vray for GOd
Like in our daily lives. People have different religions, different gods and different beliefs. For me Lumion is the top. Greetings.
UH, NO.
lumion users were the ones in architecture school who went home at 7pm the night before a critique.
Great , well explained
Thank you
Hey i am an architecture student__asus g14 amd ryzen 5 4600hs is ok ???for the architectural softwares__as there is lots of rendering_ revit and all
G14 is a great machine though desktops at the same price point are far better but for a laptop g14 is an absolute beast
It’s for student in architecture. I have the same one just with ryzen 7, 6 Ga Q-max. It’s just great 👍🏾
Hey! I'm Lumion 10 users, Thinking to try Vray 5. Is it true Vray could take a lot of time for rendering? Even for the latest Vray 5?
If by lot of time you mean each render takes like 1 hour to make instead of 2 minutes with lumion, yes vray takes decades to render..
It really takes a long time
I'm using vray 5. A good quality medium res image like 1500x1200 can be rendered in 12mins. For 2000x1600 it's 20mins. And that's for interior, exterior render is faster than interior rende tho. I have i5-8th gen only. 15-30mins waiting time is justifiable, its not like you're starring at the monitor in that time. If you consider the setup for a render ready model its definitely faster in vray.
@@sfguzmani thanks for this information. 12 minutes is really not that long to wait. Ive been using Lumion for over a year now but its really for Exterior Renderings I find, the interior still looks fake and I want to obtain renderings that will look very real within the space as I am an interior designer.
@@TheKaylaMadeline I agree with you. That’s why I use Lumion for exterior and D5 for interior. Still not as good as VRay. But fast.
all workеd
🥰🥰😍😍🤩🤩😘😘
Corona all the way
2.06. how create this kind of animation???
It is possible in Lumion 11, Animated Phasing
@@herwinver thanks. if u have a link. please share
@@afzalnabdo216 ruclips.net/video/KDkBz4gvBVY/видео.html
And in V-Ray you can't animate, only if you use a 3D animation software, in Lumion you can.
Can i use lumion in my laptop? (GTX 1050 MAX Q) please answer😣
the recommended specs are GPU with 8gb, i7+, and 16 gb ram ddr4.
Alleno CinnamonBun mine is i7 and 16 ram but videocard is not good🤷🏻♀️ so i can’t use lumion?😭
@@xayala like you can use it, but, you will wait so long for a render, we are talking about hours, ill try to use 3dmax instead with no gpu.
I used lumion on my 1050ti in my previous laptop ,i7 8th gen with 16gb of ram. It works okay except for rendering clips , it'll consume too much time so try your best to avoid that. Otherwise , day to day task would be just fine.
N12 but 1050 Ti is better that 1050
V-Ray plus UE = TOP
Whag is UE
@@clifordcanapi6159 prob unreal engine
blender is the answer lol. best quality and it s free. FREEEEE
동의하다 ^^