Wow, that's crazy fast. In my area we do HDR, window pulls, color replacement on floor reflection from windows, color balance on walls, all sorts of stuff. Or people in asia do it. I'm glad I don't have to. But if doing what you do was enough, I'd do it. More money. I think it's different in a big city then on the countryside?
I actually provide more high end images as well(I do both HDR+flash or flambient blends) but the harsh reality is the ratio is about 90% lower end images 10% high end images. Obviously I prefer the look of a well taken and edited flambient image, but I'm not too proud to put my own personal thoughts about imagery aside and follow the money. This is the style every agent in my area wants. The entire way I shoot and run my company is based about what sells the most, and this super easy technique is it around here. And for the record, I live in the second biggest city in the state and the state capitol so this is the popular style for that as well. Does not matter countryside or downtown highrise, unless it's a 2mil+ property, they want the cheaper images. Hell everything here sells in a week on market anyway so why would they spend more than they have to
@@jeremydeihl Huh, thanks for the insight. I'd love to work in your market that sounds awesome. Of course you want to maximize time value. My city is like the main media hub in Norway, and the expectations for pictures is very high. All listings are HDR even small studio apartments for 200k. Most have evening pics aswell which need even more bracketing. I noticed on the countryside here, there is less HDR. I work for a photo firm that do all the booking and editing, so I just show up, shoot, done. Nice to not have to deal with all the logistics. And since our firm do so many shoots, the agents know what they can expect. But I'm pretty sure you get more cash out of your time then me :P
Great content man. I’ve been slowly getting more and more into real estate photography. I cannot believe these aren’t HDR. Do you have a video breaking down some of your setting for a shot? I’m mainly worried about noise in dark basements, or closets/powder rooms with bad light, or also blown out windows. HDR isn’t my favourite but it’s the only way I’ve learned so far lol
I don't have a video breaking down all my settings because those change so much from room to room, but I do have a few other videos talking about my technique in particular. Here is one that has a little more of my on-site approach
I’m a seasoned photographer who recently stepped into the realm of real estate. I love it! These presets are amazing. I’m all about efficiency and voting for the shared link. I just subscribed this weekend after watching your video on how you shot this property and came across this video today. Thanks in advance if you end up sharing the presets..
The idea of the one shot is great and I did grab a couple of the R2 Minis to go along with my ad600 and ad200. I have done some one shots that look pretty good, but they look a bit flashy, and yours also look a little flashy, which I am sure youd agree. I also know that for higher end stuff you have mentioned before you use a more comprehensive method. Where do you draw the line on when youd use your one shot method vs traditional HDR/flambient?
I actually have a new video coming out about the R2 Mini this weekend! Haha But honestly the distinction is pretty easy for me, I let the agent decide. I have two different styles, 1 being what I call traditional MLS photography which is this one shot flash style, and I have a more expensive hdr or flamient bracket style. They can choose either unless their house is over 4,500 SQ ft. Anything over that size automatically gets the higher end images.
Loving the channel, just subbed! You have a great personality, easy to watch :) So, I appreciate these are quick and easy clients who just want the job done, but doing the window pulls is a bare minimum, right? Also, how did you get such a well-lit image without AEB? Thanks!
I build through the basics of my preset at the end of the video and every time I encounter a specific scenario I create a new one in my catalogue. A few of the presets I have created for interior are ones that reduces green hues for rooms with florescent lighting, one that is specifically for yellow rooms with incandescent lighting and blonde floors that removes a lot of the yellow overcast, and one for very dark wood rooms that really pushes all the values to the extreme!
Jeremy, are you basing your package on photo quantity or square footage? I noticed in previous videos you often mentioned delivering 30 photos for your MLS package but here you have 51.
My packages are based on square footage, but I have also estimated a number of images we tend to deliver for that size property and listed it with that square footage pricing
These are really helpful, will probably help me reduce the need for me to outsource. But anyway, outsourcing helps me avoid boring repetitive editing. edithere if someone needs it, not that I want to advertise but their service is really great.
I have no problem at all with you shouting out a company you currently work with and like their quality of work! Glad the video was helpful for you. These techniques work really well in properties 2500sq ft and below and works pretty well for larger properties but there are still cases and clients I use outsourcing also. Just a way to work with smaller clients with smaller budgets :)
Awesome stuff. Would love to see your settings for the exterior preset. And do you have a different one for drone shots? I agree 110% with it’s all about making things easy and efficient. Thanks again for another great video.
Ill try and cover the exterior edits in a future episode for you and that will make a nice and short one :) As for drone images, I do actually have separate presets for those. I did an entire video going over just those presets and the link to download them for free is in the description notes. Here is the link for that video: ruclips.net/video/JW_c4ezoOTQ/видео.html
I don't have any up for sale or anything, but every once in a while I'll release a video with presets attached so just be on the lookout for that in future
This technique seems to have been very successful for you, congratulations. Unfortunately for me, however, I would lose 90% of my real estate clients if I delivered images using this technique. Like you mentioned in your presentation, "they are not the best" images. I would agree many realtors just do not care and in reality even with bad images, appropriately priced homes sell. My clients realize that the images do not sell homes, they are simply used to attract attention to a property in order to facilitate a showing. My clients demand the best images as they recognize, that for them, the images are more about building their brand in order to acquire new client listings. In my market, to produce magazine quality images, 50+ images are going to take at least 2 hours to develop. I do not lose any income as my clients are willing to pay more in order to acquire better images. Bottom line, I shoot fewer jobs but produce the same income. Just a different business model that new photographers to the field may want to someday consider.
The way I see it and tell those who follow my channel is simple. Do what's best for you in your marketplace. While it used to be much much more, this style of imagery now only comprises about 20-25% of my current income for the market I'm based in, but that is an extra 20-25% I would have missed out on if I did not offer these lower end, investment property shoots. Again, this is not meant to replace higher end images, it's meant to supplement your income by offering services to investors or cheap agents. They may not be your cup of tea, and they definitely are not my cup of tea, but the harsh reality is that agents buy a shit ton of them from me. If I was to get rid of this lower end style, I would simply lose that extra money I'm making that requires less effort, input and time from my side. If I only offered the style of images I wanted to create in my marketplace I would be out of business in 2 months. For me, I'm all about making money and this is just another easy income stream for my RE photo/video business.
![I Replaced ALL my ADOBE APPS with these [free or cheaper] Alternatives!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5EfqHg49kMk/mqdefault.jpg)
Another vote to get your presets Jeremy!
Wow. Yes. Thank you.
You bet!
Wow, that's crazy fast. In my area we do HDR, window pulls, color replacement on floor reflection from windows, color balance on walls, all sorts of stuff. Or people in asia do it. I'm glad I don't have to. But if doing what you do was enough, I'd do it. More money. I think it's different in a big city then on the countryside?
I actually provide more high end images as well(I do both HDR+flash or flambient blends) but the harsh reality is the ratio is about 90% lower end images 10% high end images. Obviously I prefer the look of a well taken and edited flambient image, but I'm not too proud to put my own personal thoughts about imagery aside and follow the money. This is the style every agent in my area wants. The entire way I shoot and run my company is based about what sells the most, and this super easy technique is it around here. And for the record, I live in the second biggest city in the state and the state capitol so this is the popular style for that as well. Does not matter countryside or downtown highrise, unless it's a 2mil+ property, they want the cheaper images. Hell everything here sells in a week on market anyway so why would they spend more than they have to
@@jeremydeihl Huh, thanks for the insight. I'd love to work in your market that sounds awesome. Of course you want to maximize time value.
My city is like the main media hub in Norway, and the expectations for pictures is very high.
All listings are HDR even small studio apartments for 200k. Most have evening pics aswell which need even more bracketing.
I noticed on the countryside here, there is less HDR.
I work for a photo firm that do all the booking and editing, so I just show up, shoot, done. Nice to not have to deal with all the logistics. And since our firm do so many shoots, the agents know what they can expect.
But I'm pretty sure you get more cash out of your time then me :P
Great content man. I’ve been slowly getting more and more into real estate photography. I cannot believe these aren’t HDR. Do you have a video breaking down some of your setting for a shot?
I’m mainly worried about noise in dark basements, or closets/powder rooms with bad light, or also blown out windows. HDR isn’t my favourite but it’s the only way I’ve learned so far lol
I don't have a video breaking down all my settings because those change so much from room to room, but I do have a few other videos talking about my technique in particular. Here is one that has a little more of my on-site approach
ruclips.net/video/77aEhXwHoM0/видео.html
I’m a seasoned photographer who recently stepped into the realm of real estate. I love it! These presets are amazing. I’m all about efficiency and voting for the shared link. I just subscribed this weekend after watching your video on how you shot this property and came across this video today. Thanks in advance if you end up sharing the presets..
Thanks for the sub Brian! If there are any topics you want videos made on in particular don't be afraid to reach out
The idea of the one shot is great and I did grab a couple of the R2 Minis to go along with my ad600 and ad200. I have done some one shots that look pretty good, but they look a bit flashy, and yours also look a little flashy, which I am sure youd agree. I also know that for higher end stuff you have mentioned before you use a more comprehensive method. Where do you draw the line on when youd use your one shot method vs traditional HDR/flambient?
I actually have a new video coming out about the R2 Mini this weekend! Haha
But honestly the distinction is pretty easy for me, I let the agent decide. I have two different styles, 1 being what I call traditional MLS photography which is this one shot flash style, and I have a more expensive hdr or flamient bracket style. They can choose either unless their house is over 4,500 SQ ft. Anything over that size automatically gets the higher end images.
@@jeremydeihl sounds like the best way to do it. Thanks for the reply! Looking forward to the video. Take care.
Loving the channel, just subbed! You have a great personality, easy to watch :) So, I appreciate these are quick and easy clients who just want the job done, but doing the window pulls is a bare minimum, right? Also, how did you get such a well-lit image without AEB? Thanks!
Excellent Jeremy. Very simple and efficient editing process. Thanks for sharing.
Thank you!
Great video Jeremy...and your process rocks!
Glad you enjoyed it! I just find it a much easier and quicker process for properties 2,500 sq ft and below
It would be great to see/review your presets, as I could compare them to the ones I created/use…knowledge is power! Keep up the good work!
I build through the basics of my preset at the end of the video and every time I encounter a specific scenario I create a new one in my catalogue. A few of the presets I have created for interior are ones that reduces green hues for rooms with florescent lighting, one that is specifically for yellow rooms with incandescent lighting and blonde floors that removes a lot of the yellow overcast, and one for very dark wood rooms that really pushes all the values to the extreme!
Jeremy, are you basing your package on photo quantity or square footage? I noticed in previous videos you often mentioned delivering 30 photos for your MLS package but here you have 51.
My packages are based on square footage, but I have also estimated a number of images we tend to deliver for that size property and listed it with that square footage pricing
These are really helpful, will probably help me reduce the need for me to outsource. But anyway, outsourcing helps me avoid boring repetitive editing. edithere if someone needs it, not that I want to advertise but their service is really great.
I have no problem at all with you shouting out a company you currently work with and like their quality of work! Glad the video was helpful for you. These techniques work really well in properties 2500sq ft and below and works pretty well for larger properties but there are still cases and clients I use outsourcing also. Just a way to work with smaller clients with smaller budgets :)
Awesome stuff. Would love to see your settings for the exterior preset. And do you have a different one for drone shots? I agree 110% with it’s all about making things easy and efficient. Thanks again for another great video.
Ill try and cover the exterior edits in a future episode for you and that will make a nice and short one :)
As for drone images, I do actually have separate presets for those. I did an entire video going over just those presets and the link to download them for free is in the description notes. Here is the link for that video:
ruclips.net/video/JW_c4ezoOTQ/видео.html
@@jeremydeihl awesome I’ll take a look at it for sure and be waiting here for the exterior preset video…. Thanks for great information
I’ll need is Lightroom…
Several head slapping moments. Are your presets for sale?
I don't have any up for sale or anything, but every once in a while I'll release a video with presets attached so just be on the lookout for that in future
Just saw the literal last seconds...yes would appreciate presets. I'm on Oly so they would be helpful. I'm flabbergasted at the speed.
It's all about building a pre-set that matches the way you shoot and doing as much as possible in camera :)
Wait how the heck did you shoot those though….
This technique seems to have been very successful for you, congratulations. Unfortunately for me, however, I would lose 90% of my real estate clients if I delivered images using this technique. Like you mentioned in your presentation, "they are not the best" images. I would agree many realtors just do not care and in reality even with bad images, appropriately priced homes sell. My clients realize that the images do not sell homes, they are simply used to attract attention to a property in order to facilitate a showing. My clients demand the best images as they recognize, that for them, the images are more about building their brand in order to acquire new client listings. In my market, to produce magazine quality images, 50+ images are going to take at least 2 hours to develop. I do not lose any income as my clients are willing to pay more in order to acquire better images. Bottom line, I shoot fewer jobs but produce the same income. Just a different business model that new photographers to the field may want to someday consider.
The way I see it and tell those who follow my channel is simple. Do what's best for you in your marketplace. While it used to be much much more, this style of imagery now only comprises about 20-25% of my current income for the market I'm based in, but that is an extra 20-25% I would have missed out on if I did not offer these lower end, investment property shoots. Again, this is not meant to replace higher end images, it's meant to supplement your income by offering services to investors or cheap agents. They may not be your cup of tea, and they definitely are not my cup of tea, but the harsh reality is that agents buy a shit ton of them from me. If I was to get rid of this lower end style, I would simply lose that extra money I'm making that requires less effort, input and time from my side. If I only offered the style of images I wanted to create in my marketplace I would be out of business in 2 months. For me, I'm all about making money and this is just another easy income stream for my RE photo/video business.
Only a complete beginner in photography can believe this lie.
I litterally show you the exact process and the images it produces. Shows who the real complete beginner in this comment section is... 😂