Rupture running the same team for every encounters because they are forced to, meanwhile burn team running the same team for every encounter because they literally have no choice
Once upon a time. 3 Happy Rupture Types live in a forest They do not have a name, but the units in the forest called them 'inflict only potency, no count', 'inflict count on last coin' and 'not inflict rupture condition'
Rupture did get a neat trick recently. Because both Devyat Rodion and Cinq Meursault stop depleting Rupture Count at 15x3 or more. They are not Count Negative, they are Count INFINITE, when used correctly. The issue is getting to that 15x3. Conveniently, Lantern Don can drop a +3 Count on her Lust skill, and Talisman on the bench can provide big potency to one person. So the combo is: (1) Run a team of Rodion, Meursault, Don and one other Rupture ID of your choice, with access to Gluttony. Both Rodion and Meursault on slots 1/2 for extra actions per turn. (2) Wait for Don to draw orange, and play it, don't touch the 2x4 stack you've just created. (3) Play 4 Gluttony skills on the same turn, Rodion should be able to build a huge stack with her 1st move and then you do stupid damage Far less mental gymnastics than trying to slap 5 Talisman on the enemy, which was the old meta, and when executed correctly, can straight up skip boss phases or wins the fight outright.
I for one enjoy the aspect of rupture that I can't nobrain my encounters, especially using talisman Sinclair is a fun time. At the same time I do not agree with the sentiment that Rupture has to be kept in check with weak IDs, when sinking and tremor are running amok with the amount of damage they can do for a fraction of the tedium and clunkiness.
Rupture is too strong as a mechanic (true damage per hit, no drawbacks to the player) As such, they can't allow us to stack it high Since we can't stack it high, we can't build synergies or use the effects reliably As a result, rupture my ass.
@@ЖурумбаевМираль Unlike in Ruina there is nothing about how Bleed works fundamentally that makes Staggering by default bad for Bleed. You don't lose anything from staggering the enemy, you get less attacks coming your way (or none at all) and you're more free to apply bleed (or entirely). Sure, if you weren't struggling with Count or clashing with the enemy I guess staggering the enemy means you have a higher turn count.
I've heard a suggestion how to change rupture in better ways. And one guy suggested removing count and leaving only potency. For example, if unit inflicted 4 rupture the next attack will trigger rupture damage and decrease rupture value to 3. This way more identities will be valuable in a rupture team and whole status will be less punishing, of course talismans would need a rework with this system but i still think it's a better execution of rupture than what we have in game
talisman sinclair has been locked in the bench for his crimes of not allowing count neutral ids that dont roll like lantern don except for that one time pm did an oopsie and released devyat rodion and then did it again with cinq meursault but didnt give him a glut defensive skill
> Me being new at the game, with no identity sinergies, and already liking rupture just because my two strongest boys are Liu Meur (unrelated) and Red Sheet sinclair.
@monochrome4937 ah yes, the "lacks reading comprehension comment", the comment known to properly read scentences before yapping (they didn't read the "unrelated" parenthesis).
@@trollman_2345 Apologies my dear friend, I'd like you to understand that after a statement like "I like Rupture because...", one commoner without reading comprehension would naturally assume that related reasons would be provided, not arbitrary information, and this is not taking into account that said unrelated information being half of the reasons given.
Hi guys, before the comment section turn into a case study as to how Rupture is actually goated, this video is meant to be satire. I'm neither mad nor salty about the status - do read the description first!
Rupture is, despite everything, still in a decent to great standing position due to Tailsmen Res Strats and Superbia being SO good for them. You don't even need a bunch of Count if you Double Slot DevDion or C-Sault (or both) with ML-Don + any number of other Rupture Positive-ish units, since between the Null Eaters and the Neutral - Positive Count app you can nicely hover between 3 - 6 Count and however much Potency you can get off of Tailsmen while whailing on bosses. Even grindy Rupture fights have great EGO to counteract how Count hungry the Status is - Ebony Stem and Rambling Man put in some fine work, aeed Gregor makes Gloom go positive, the Whip EGO can stack Rupture like cray-cray, etc.. The problem with Rupture isn't Count at this point - it's Tailsmen's Sinclair sheer existence and the Status' potential for boss breaking havoc that motivates PM to NEVER give us straightforward support or conventionally strong units. Until they do something about that ID or the Status itself Rupture will continue to get jank support and weird mechanics.
I want more dimensional rift or at least a good alternative like a status that disable rapture for 1 turn, you can still inflict rapture just that it wont deal dmg ie not loss count
The problem with rupture is that if you could stack it properly it'd be busted and the more hp the bosses get the worse it will be. So they pretty much can't give us good count ever. They also messed up bad by introducing TClair and his infinite potency nonsense. From a game design perspective it's a freaking nightmare.
The new rupture threshold-based ID’s are a step in the right direction tho. I for one have the idea of an ID that only inflicts Count above the 15/3 threshold but inflicts a status effect that ends the stack if the Count reaches it (so like a time limit on your stack)
The main issue I see if rupture gets the major count support people want then most if not all fights become trivial due to rupture flat out ignoring defensive stats and when built properly will nuke anyone's hp with flat damage. Canto 7 showed that too with lantern Don solos. Personally I want them to get the support too but at least in MD thundering branch kinda mitigates the count negative coins.
The problem with making rupture as "mindless" as the other statuses, is that it would make it WAY too op. Think about it: 99 Burn is a lot weakier than, let's say 40 rupture. Sinking does Gloom, while rupture does true damage. Bleed does the same, but relies on coin amounts +Yersault if you wanna actvate it If rupture was that easy to build up, it would undoubtedly be the strongest with basically no contest, because why run any other status if you can run rupture, right? I honestly really like the count tjing they have with the newest IDs, i think it's a nice way to balance it out
I feel like rupture is in a weird situation where if it’s able to get an ID that actually builds good count then it will be the best status in the game by several miles and only rivaled by sinking but if it stays like this it’s one of the worst in the game
@@not_na A nice idea, but unlikely, looks like they're sticking with the stats as they were introduced, still thought this would make rupture much more viable.
Hmmmm I wonder....I really do wonder why for SOME reason PM wouldent want players to reliably stack alot of true damage for every skill hit for some reason....
Dimension shredder yisang? Lantern don? W corp yisang? Hello?!? Either way yeah rupture is a bit stagenent with getting viable new toys, however the introduction of cinq meursault and devyat rodion massively improved the architype. With meursault being able to reliably generate pride and not sucking ass for the first time allowing the usage of ebony stem more reliably making 7 outis a pretty good filler unit and devyat rodion pairing really well with talisman combos.
I'll officially say Rupture is saved WHEN they nuke the Potency Cap dowm to 30-20, they saw those RR clears and said "fuck that we capping it down to 15/3" and then they saw what tgey doing with Devyat Rodion amd said "Nah We kneecappingbthem again with that bum ass Fanghunt conditional". Seriously No other Status effect has a base effect this strong, all the other statuses got limits Burn: That fuck ass 99 potency Cap straight ruined them.from the start; Bleed: Pray to god he got the right voins else you just nuke your count; Tremor: Literally does nothing when they got no Staggerbar; Sinking: Sanity and resistemce
bro forgot about aedd gregor...(sparking discharge makes glooms skills count neutral bare minimum) Rupture isnt a bad status. as someone who one tricks rupture, it is pretty good at melting single bosses or ones with lots of protection (since rupture deals true damage that ignores sin affinities) but I do agree you need to min max the fights in order to keep count high. I can consistently get high rupture count when I use this team: ring yi sang, lantern don quixote, talisman sinclair, 7a faust, devyat rodion and rosespanner gregor, why this team: don quixote s1 for rupture count positive, her s2 for starting a count, and her s3 when aedd is active is +3 count, neutral otherwise.(must run, gives great count) gregor s2 is count positive and s3 is count neutral with aedd, and some stuff with charge i dont care too much.(mainly the aedd ego is more important to use with gloom skills) Faust s2 (s2 is negative 1 count)and s3 only give count when clashing so it can save count since it applies before hitting, (s2 neutral with aedd unless clashing then it gives +3 count) sinclair s2 when no rupture or on a free body part (or when only 1 rupture count) to get to 5 talismans then s3 for free(recommended to go unopposed ) . After use had been done, can use branch of knowledge for instant 12 rupture potency(i forget if talismans on an enemy can go over 5). rodion clashes great and neutral at 15 potency 3 count which is easy to get with talisman and aedd.(her 15 potency 3 count passive does not include applied talismans so it makes are large amount of coins good) solid. yi sang s1 great with aedd since it has a chance to add rupture count for free, s2 also great rupture count and dim shred ego passive just makes it better(dim shred does drain count by 5 so use early preferrably before a rupture count stacking) (save gloom skills for aedd juice and never corrode the ego) notable runner ups are lccb ishmael's s3 for a rupture juice of 8 rupture and 2 count positive. s2 is gloom and s1 is single coin 7a heathclif s2 is count positive by 2 and his skills mainly dont hurt rupture count too much whilst being a good rupture potency guy, (heathclif is less important when you have aedd's spark discharge with talismans since you want that gloom juice for potency moreso) the thing about rodion actually is since she has so many coins, she can proc more of the talisman debuff without hurting count at all
First, it is not a serious video (stated in the description), I don't actually think the status is dogshit. Second, I captioned in the video that "i am NOT counting spark discharge as unique rupture". Thanks for the write up nonetheless, but the video is meant to be satire
I totally disagree with that, rupture’s current position is great the sheer amount of cheese you can do with two new rupture ego’s is huge as now you have a good target for the talisman Sinclair’s hp based support passive in the face of K corp Hong Lu and two new count neutral Id’s. So now you can just pop gluttony absolute resonance , use Hong Lou’s lasso Ego and have from 25 potency and 2 count up to 51 potency and 2 count. Only issue with rupture is not the count application but the clashing which 2 new Id’s fix
you have sheep don? 2count cliff 2count combo this two by puting ship don in first slot she wuld be first to get second speed die if any thets +3 count on avrage just block insted of attaking dewyat is areal word it stands for 9 in ukrainian
Maybe the rupture count was the friends we made along the way... Actually tho, in my opinion, rupture ain't gonna be saved. It's gonna be reincarnated in charge. We got 2 guys who roll almost 30 - rip space moment for them. Or maybe I am crazy and delusional, idk. Yknow. Speaking of delusional. When Yujin from Shi will release, maybe, just MAYBE, she will inflict +3 rupture count on her s1
Rupture running the same team for every encounters because they are forced to, meanwhile burn team running the same team for every encounter because they literally have no choice
Lmfao atleast fucking liu ishmael and rodion are actually really fucking good
just the two effects i like to run
It seems like we must buy a DLC for an actual burn team 'gameplay'
@@augustuslunasol10thapostlerupture has good ID's too lol
the big and scary bear identity will save rupture
Just maybe
Bearcliff will save Rupture.
How fearsome!
Once upon a time.
3 Happy Rupture Types live in a forest
They do not have a name, but the units in the forest called them 'inflict only potency, no count', 'inflict count on last coin' and 'not inflict rupture condition'
" Tailsman is so ass! "
Meat Don honest reaction with Tailsman support :
Don's meat 🤤🤤
@not_na I'd suck it dry tbh
@@not_na
Don's WHAT
@@frozenser.2356 don does NOT have the meat
@@not_naFr, LET THIS MAN 🗣️
Rupture's count is being hard carried by a funny sheep, truly what Demian intended.
Rupture did get a neat trick recently. Because both Devyat Rodion and Cinq Meursault stop depleting Rupture Count at 15x3 or more. They are not Count Negative, they are Count INFINITE, when used correctly. The issue is getting to that 15x3. Conveniently, Lantern Don can drop a +3 Count on her Lust skill, and Talisman on the bench can provide big potency to one person.
So the combo is:
(1) Run a team of Rodion, Meursault, Don and one other Rupture ID of your choice, with access to Gluttony. Both Rodion and Meursault on slots 1/2 for extra actions per turn.
(2) Wait for Don to draw orange, and play it, don't touch the 2x4 stack you've just created.
(3) Play 4 Gluttony skills on the same turn, Rodion should be able to build a huge stack with her 1st move and then you do stupid damage
Far less mental gymnastics than trying to slap 5 Talisman on the enemy, which was the old meta, and when executed correctly, can straight up skip boss phases or wins the fight outright.
4th guy is there so that every fight has their own xichun to be bait
ebony stems passive would have been so good for rupture if it didnt apply the count NEXT TURN
I for one enjoy the aspect of rupture that I can't nobrain my encounters, especially using talisman Sinclair is a fun time. At the same time I do not agree with the sentiment that Rupture has to be kept in check with weak IDs, when sinking and tremor are running amok with the amount of damage they can do for a fraction of the tedium and clunkiness.
Use 4a glutony res lol
I'll do unspeakable things to you
Rupture is too strong as a mechanic (true damage per hit, no drawbacks to the player)
As such, they can't allow us to stack it high
Since we can't stack it high, we can't build synergies or use the effects reliably
As a result, rupture my ass.
If you do the math, in a infinite count bleed it's almost the same thing, sometimes better
@@PSergio7341 Bleed is inconsistent, because of the staggering enemy, but this is compensated be the fact that bleed ids hit like a truck
@@ЖурумбаевМираль
Unlike in Ruina there is nothing about how Bleed works fundamentally that makes Staggering by default bad for Bleed. You don't lose anything from staggering the enemy, you get less attacks coming your way (or none at all) and you're more free to apply bleed (or entirely). Sure, if you weren't struggling with Count or clashing with the enemy I guess staggering the enemy means you have a higher turn count.
“This fucking count economy is worse than Zimbabwe.” Is a crazy ass statement bro 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
I've heard a suggestion how to change rupture in better ways. And one guy suggested removing count and leaving only potency. For example, if unit inflicted 4 rupture the next attack will trigger rupture damage and decrease rupture value to 3. This way more identities will be valuable in a rupture team and whole status will be less punishing, of course talismans would need a rework with this system but i still think it's a better execution of rupture than what we have in game
hong lu season identity will save the rupture society
1:36 wawawa go my lantern don solo
talisman sinclair has been locked in the bench for his crimes of not allowing count neutral ids that dont roll like lantern don except for that one time pm did an oopsie and released devyat rodion and then did it again with cinq meursault but didnt give him a glut defensive skill
0:52 8 count on corrosion* bro how did you mess that up twice
That aside amazing rupture shitpost my goat Na never fails to deliver
I frogor
Next season will be rupture season. Trust.
the absolute state of rupture in 2024
At least they are OP in MD
Everyone and anyone can be OP there.
@cringeman6534 but I think rupture got one of the best in terms of ego gifts. Thrill is OP and The Rupture doing Rupture is good enough
@@No.1KiddoIt would be a case if Charge didnt exist, their ego gifts are broken and they can spam their strongest attacks non-stop
Let's just hope season 6 will be the rupture season and will save the rupture society.
4 glut res on rodion for 15 potency and 3 count, 2 ids that can clash with almost any skill 🥱. (God I love cinq meursault actually peak ID)
Yeah of course Rodion would love gluttony resonance she's getting fatter by the hour
@@not_na BBW Rodya 🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤🤤
That one Jamaican homie ^
@@not_naI love fat bitches
> Me being new at the game, with no identity sinergies, and already liking rupture just because my two strongest boys are Liu Meur (unrelated) and Red Sheet sinclair.
Zwei Meursault?
@@Meowsamurai Brainfart, it's Liu meur
@@trollman_2345Ah yes, Liu Meur the ID known for Rupture (he only inflicts Burn)
@monochrome4937 ah yes, the "lacks reading comprehension comment", the comment known to properly read scentences before yapping (they didn't read the "unrelated" parenthesis).
@@trollman_2345 Apologies my dear friend, I'd like you to understand that after a statement like "I like Rupture because...", one commoner without reading comprehension would naturally assume that related reasons would be provided, not arbitrary information, and this is not taking into account that said unrelated information being half of the reasons given.
ngl sinking would be in the same boat if it didn't have echoes of the manor (excluding the sinking messiah rodion combo)
1:18
At first we made fun of them, but look at us now. Truly the Kroomer was right. N Sinclair was the first sign of how cucked we really are
Hi guys, before the comment section turn into a case study as to how Rupture is actually goated, this video is meant to be satire. I'm neither mad nor salty about the status - do read the description first!
Oh don't worry, I get that the video was made for fun. I wrote my mini-guide for fun too. And maybe someone will benefit from it.
@zeru2150 oh yeah, cheers then. Great write up, man
Aye, the Devyat' is actually russian word for 9 (Девять) so it is a real word
Bro you just made that language up right now
@@not_na Bro??? Russia's language is Russian. What did you expect for it to be? English?
i only use my rupture teams when i got ego gifts in mirror dingeons, almost never use em without rupture ego gifts thats how pathetic it is 😭
Rupture is, despite everything, still in a decent to great standing position due to Tailsmen Res Strats and Superbia being SO good for them. You don't even need a bunch of Count if you Double Slot DevDion or C-Sault (or both) with ML-Don + any number of other Rupture Positive-ish units, since between the Null Eaters and the Neutral - Positive Count app you can nicely hover between 3 - 6 Count and however much Potency you can get off of Tailsmen while whailing on bosses. Even grindy Rupture fights have great EGO to counteract how Count hungry the Status is - Ebony Stem and Rambling Man put in some fine work, aeed Gregor makes Gloom go positive, the Whip EGO can stack Rupture like cray-cray, etc..
The problem with Rupture isn't Count at this point - it's Tailsmen's Sinclair sheer existence and the Status' potential for boss breaking havoc that motivates PM to NEVER give us straightforward support or conventionally strong units. Until they do something about that ID or the Status itself Rupture will continue to get jank support and weird mechanics.
PM is too scared to make Rupture strong, yet somehow Thrill still exists
Now its time for my head to burst. Good day.
Rupture being good or not depends on if you get thrill or not, if you do- instant S tier, win
If you dont, ehhhh well good luck I guess.
I want more dimensional rift or at least a good alternative like a status that disable rapture for 1 turn, you can still inflict rapture just that it wont deal dmg ie not loss count
The problem with rupture is that if you could stack it properly it'd be busted and the more hp the bosses get the worse it will be. So they pretty much can't give us good count ever. They also messed up bad by introducing TClair and his infinite potency nonsense. From a game design perspective it's a freaking nightmare.
The new rupture threshold-based ID’s are a step in the right direction tho. I for one have the idea of an ID that only inflicts Count above the 15/3 threshold but inflicts a status effect that ends the stack if the Count reaches it (so like a time limit on your stack)
@victorvirgili4447 If only devyat sinclair and fanghunt hong lu didn't eat count at 15/3
The main issue I see if rupture gets the major count support people want then most if not all fights become trivial due to rupture flat out ignoring defensive stats and when built properly will nuke anyone's hp with flat damage. Canto 7 showed that too with lantern Don solos. Personally I want them to get the support too but at least in MD thundering branch kinda mitigates the count negative coins.
As a tremor user, I liked being jer-
Fr burn almost never have a burn count problem except if you just get glimpse and never got hot juicy
next season will be rupture season. Trust
The problem with making rupture as "mindless" as the other statuses, is that it would make it WAY too op.
Think about it: 99 Burn is a lot weakier than, let's say 40 rupture. Sinking does Gloom, while rupture does true damage. Bleed does the same, but relies on coin amounts +Yersault if you wanna actvate it
If rupture was that easy to build up, it would undoubtedly be the strongest with basically no contest, because why run any other status if you can run rupture, right?
I honestly really like the count tjing they have with the newest IDs, i think it's a nice way to balance it out
2:28 EMU OTORI MENTIONED!? WON WON… WONDERHOY!!!
We need Rodion to save Rupture.
I feel like rupture is in a weird situation where if it’s able to get an ID that actually builds good count then it will be the best status in the game by several miles and only rivaled by sinking but if it stays like this it’s one of the worst in the game
Not with Deyvat Sinclair, just to be clear, just to be clear.
Om has to be careful with rupture since it's true damage, but i do understand your concerns.
They could lowkey change it to glut damage..
@@not_na A nice idea, but unlikely, looks like they're sticking with the stats as they were introduced, still thought this would make rupture much more viable.
Youre forgetting Talismans off the field passive.
devyat IS a word tho. pronounced Jevajtji. Russian word “девять” which means “nine”
Rupture is fine
What will save rupture is Rupturebush Yi Sang with Rupture deluge
@@somebodyoncetoldme1141 rupture deluge and it's like 4 potency x 1 count for 4 damage 😭
@@not_naDon't forget 3 rupture count on the next turn inflicted by the skill one!
short answer: no
long answer: noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Short answer: always has been
Longest answer: literally search on youtube any canto 7 clear with rupture
shi association lovers in shambles
Hmmmm I wonder....I really do wonder why for SOME reason PM wouldent want players to reliably stack alot of true damage for every skill hit for some reason....
devyat' is nine in russian, so its a real word
Dimension shredder yisang? Lantern don? W corp yisang? Hello?!?
Either way yeah rupture is a bit stagenent with getting viable new toys, however the introduction of cinq meursault and devyat rodion massively improved the architype.
With meursault being able to reliably generate pride and not sucking ass for the first time allowing the usage of ebony stem more reliably making 7 outis a pretty good filler unit and devyat rodion pairing really well with talisman combos.
ALL MY RUPTURE UNITS ARE MORONS!!!!!!!
Rupture NTR.
Talisman is better than devyat
I'll officially say Rupture is saved WHEN they nuke the Potency Cap dowm to 30-20, they saw those RR clears and said "fuck that we capping it down to 15/3" and then they saw what tgey doing with Devyat Rodion amd said "Nah We kneecappingbthem again with that bum ass Fanghunt conditional". Seriously No other Status effect has a base effect this strong, all the other statuses got limits Burn: That fuck ass 99 potency Cap straight ruined them.from the start; Bleed: Pray to god he got the right voins else you just nuke your count; Tremor: Literally does nothing when they got no Staggerbar; Sinking: Sanity and resistemce
bro forgot about aedd gregor...(sparking discharge makes glooms skills count neutral bare minimum)
Rupture isnt a bad status. as someone who one tricks rupture, it is pretty good at melting single bosses or ones with lots of protection (since rupture deals true damage that ignores sin affinities) but I do agree you need to min max the fights in order to keep count high.
I can consistently get high rupture count when I use this team:
ring yi sang, lantern don quixote, talisman sinclair, 7a faust, devyat rodion and rosespanner gregor,
why this team:
don quixote s1 for rupture count positive, her s2 for starting a count, and her s3 when aedd is active is +3 count, neutral otherwise.(must run, gives great count)
gregor s2 is count positive and s3 is count neutral with aedd, and some stuff with charge i dont care too much.(mainly the aedd ego is more important to use with gloom skills)
Faust s2 (s2 is negative 1 count)and s3 only give count when clashing so it can save count since it applies before hitting, (s2 neutral with aedd unless clashing then it gives +3 count)
sinclair s2 when no rupture or on a free body part (or when only 1 rupture count) to get to 5 talismans then s3 for free(recommended to go unopposed ) . After use had been done, can use branch of knowledge for instant 12 rupture potency(i forget if talismans on an enemy can go over 5).
rodion clashes great and neutral at 15 potency 3 count which is easy to get with talisman and aedd.(her 15 potency 3 count passive does not include applied talismans so it makes are large amount of coins good) solid.
yi sang s1 great with aedd since it has a chance to add rupture count for free, s2 also great rupture count and dim shred ego passive just makes it better(dim shred does drain count by 5 so use early preferrably before a rupture count stacking)
(save gloom skills for aedd juice and never corrode the ego)
notable runner ups are lccb ishmael's s3 for a rupture juice of 8 rupture and 2 count positive. s2 is gloom and s1 is single coin
7a heathclif s2 is count positive by 2 and his skills mainly dont hurt rupture count too much whilst being a good rupture potency guy, (heathclif is less important when you have aedd's spark discharge with talismans since you want that gloom juice for potency moreso)
the thing about rodion actually is since she has so many coins, she can proc more of the talisman debuff without hurting count at all
First, it is not a serious video (stated in the description), I don't actually think the status is dogshit. Second, I captioned in the video that "i am NOT counting spark discharge as unique rupture". Thanks for the write up nonetheless, but the video is meant to be satire
Deviat' is a real world tho it means 9
I totally disagree with that, rupture’s current position is great the sheer amount of cheese you can do with two new rupture ego’s is huge as now you have a good target for the talisman Sinclair’s hp based support passive in the face of K corp Hong Lu and two new count neutral Id’s. So now you can just pop gluttony absolute resonance , use Hong Lou’s lasso Ego and have from 25 potency and 2 count up to 51 potency and 2 count. Only issue with rupture is not the count application but the clashing which 2 new Id’s fix
Rupture running on 2 idiots, 7cliff and a bench warmer
This peaks
devyat means nine in russian
Idk how to use the sinclair
what did he sayyy?? 1:20
2:34 wow, sounds a bit offensive
Always was
"is rupture saved?" devyat sinclair on the thumbnail 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
N corp Sinclair wannabe on the thumbnail*
2:32 ДЕВЯТЬ
you have sheep don? 2count cliff 2count combo this two by puting ship don in first slot she wuld be first to get second speed die if any thets +3 count on avrage just block insted of attaking
dewyat is areal word it stands for 9 in ukrainian
I HATE DEVYAT IDS SO MUCH
Maybe the rupture count was the friends we made along the way...
Actually tho, in my opinion, rupture ain't gonna be saved. It's gonna be reincarnated in charge. We got 2 guys who roll almost 30 - rip space moment for them.
Or maybe I am crazy and delusional, idk. Yknow. Speaking of delusional. When Yujin from Shi will release, maybe, just MAYBE, she will inflict +3 rupture count on her s1
No lol
That's what I'm saying
no the fuck it isnt
Tl;dr: No
"is rupture finally good"
Brother in christ is ignoring most gimmicks and beating stuff at 3 turns not good
skill issue
Skill issue