It IS the 20th of December in my neck of the woods. Video still says "Video Unavailable" followed by "This video is Private". Simply supporting the other two comments on this. One from 21 hours ago, the other from 4 hours ago. Perhaps you meant "shows 21 December"???
I'd say 66% of it could fly. Some of it might only just beat the flight record of the first aircraft ever, and some might beat the Christmas Miracle....
They literally drilled holes through the pressure hull on their submarines to run shore power because maintenance issues would let them run on internal power.
This might be my favorite war game ever 😂😂😂 you got the whole crew, some beautiful future/concept planes, loads of funny glitches and commentary, and most importantly, maximum boom boom!
since fuel has always been an issue in all the missions especially with the 5th gen aircraft not having enough fuel due to increased RCS if they carry external tanks, I was wondering if you would be able to simulate the airforces new low drag and pylon program slated for the f22 upgrade and how that would affect the navy especially in the pacific theatre. thanks. love your content
The B1R reminds me of Dale Brown's B1C Excalibur in the "Flight of the Old Dog" sequel novels. It would have been SUCH a badass low level penetration strike bomber with standoff defenses that it's downright painful the B1R never happened.
Mach 500!? That’s nearly as fast as the Parker Solar Probe at perihelion and you’ll fly straight out of the solar system if you went that fast around Earth.
Now I’m curious, since you said the your simulated F-35 is starting to outperform the F-22 would you be able to put them against each other so we can see how much each has changed/hasn’t changed.
The problem I've got is that the golden rule of youtube is that you are not allowed to show the F-22 lose a battle, ever. I've lost thousands of subscribers through non-scripted dogfight videos where F-22 loses. No longer willing to do it TBH.
I think a better explanation for why the satellites didn't pick up the test site would be to have three separate test sites and then have one of them randomly be generated to be THE target and "found" 10 minutes into the mission
Human procedural generation of mission objectives lol! Once in a while may be more fun than expected and more realistic. In reality nothing goes to plan right? Still love these scenario too
Congratulations on completing your first semester at college @dampsock! I'm on winter break as well. I'm close to completing my BA in Psychology. I started going back to school part time in the mid 2010's and I am almost done! Enjoy your break sir! 🙂
The SR-72s are carrying the improved version of the ASAT missiles first tested on the F-15s.😂😂 You know I was thinking about how the B-52 used to have a tail gunner, or radar guided tail gun. Could you imagine if the B-oneR had a directed energy "Laser" tail gun?
If houthis keep stopping traffic for the Suez Canal, can we see what an Egyptian response might be in Yemen. And if not too big, how this might change with Iranian Air Force involvement or at least, threat.
Satellites cant be used because the tech needed to see deep enough into the mountains are ground penetrating radar, and since rock is so dense, you have to be much closer than a satellite can go - square-cube law with radio wave amplitude.
Just came across this channel, you guys come up with a lot of interesting scenario and I had no idea all of these mods existed for DCS. I've still got to wonder what Boeing was thinking when they pitched the B-1R back all those years ago. B-ONE-R? Someone must have gotten a laugh out of that.
Epic battle, Cap! Looking forward to Part 2. One thing to note though that according to Alex Hollings' excellent research on the Sr-72, it was always meant to be able to be able to carry weapons. But then again, that would make for a boring video wouldnt it?
Fair comment. We have so many other cool weapons platforms (B-21/B-1R/NGAD etc) that I thought it would be fun to keep the SR-72 as purely a spy plane like the SR-71.
Enjoyed the vid, the only minor issue i have and have had, is that realistically this raid would have been done in the dark of night (2am-4am), however i do understand that this would have been no fun for the players and you audience. So, please take my observation with maybe a grain of salt. 😂
player wise flying at night can be very fun. but from a filming stand point for the viewers it dosen't make for very easy to watch content.. cheers and thanks for watching
@@simba1113 😂😂 Uh-oh!! I see you BIG MONEY BAGS!! 💰💰💰 Lol Nah bro I'm just 🤡ing around, 🫵🏾 and ALL of GR are 🔥🔥 pilots, ship captains and idk about tank drivers? Y'all don't any tank battles anymore but that's ok because I come here for the aircraft battles mostly then the surface vessels unless you're doing both at the same time. Anyways lemme STFU and you get back to greatness lol The People's CHAMP! PLUS you're AMERICAN like me!!! I'm from ATL, GA but live in Virginia now. Used to be in the Air Force myself, stationed at Shaw Air Force Base in Sumter, SC.
re. Blocking satellite reconissance Dazzling (or permenantly blinding) photoreconissance spy satellites with lasers is reportedly under active development by certain countries (and has been hypothesised in fiction since the '80s). That should provide a realistic reason for no satellite reconissance in the mission roleplay.
Actually the B-21 is already being deployed to air force bases right now. My brother is an airman at Whitemans Air Force base in Missouri, and they are already planning to faze out the B-2 this year. 2024
There was once a battle with Iran and U.S. when the Iranians planted a bunch of mines in the sea and a U.S. Destroyer got hit by it. As a "proportional response" U.S. destroyed half of their Navy in 24 hours.
hey cap I recently saw a tweet about drones in the countermeasure pods instead of flares/chaff. Would this be possible to model in DCS? (cant post the link here)
One small error in your war simulation, its highly unlikely that Iran has any AIM154 Phoenixes left for her F14's. And I doubt that they kept some, if they are even functional after 50 years of rusting in storage. Let alone that they will be able to get a good radar lock on any 5th generation stealth fighter especially 160 miles off, which is the maximum firing range for this old air to air missile.
5:26 A few weeks ago Russia used some sort of radar interference system to prevent satellite imaging of Crimea, presumably for some specific type of radar system or frequency. I can't find the video now but it looked like someone had scratched up the image with a fork.
Is it just me or this video simply cuts short at 41:28...? What is this? No explanation or anything. Judging by the comments, nobody else had that problem.
Wow! I sincerely appreciate Dark talking normally (i.e., very little vocal fry)! Enjoyed the vid! Just out of curiosity, wouldn't they use ships and cruise missiles?
Bro the main point of DCS is FLIGHT ✈️🛫 (FLYING AIRCRAFT) So yeah in a REAL LIFE situation or IF they were trying to be realistic they would have used some type of cruise missile or other air to ground munition...but this AIN'T real life and they AIN'T trying to be realistic. Also NOBODY wants to watch a video with them JUST shooting some cruise missiles. The whole video would only be like 10 minutes or less. And LAME. 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️👎🏾 JUST. LIKE. 🫵🏾 YOU 🫵🏾 🤡🤡
Riskinhos make a good point. Cruise missiles have neither the guidance systems nor kinematics necessary to intercept fighter jets. And how on earth could the ships be delivered to target? They weigh tens of thousands of tons! Any launch or propulsion system that could handle that kind of weight is many, many decades away.
IRL I would think NGADs would be good dogfighters if they have AIM-9X because they could see and shoot in all directions at once *don't KNOW if Peregrines have the same targeting capability - shrug - they probably do.
no vertical stabilisers. you can't change the laws of physics. obviously they will dogfight a lot worse. which is irrelevant because they weren't design for that role and won't do it. other aircraft will also have the AIM-9X. AIM-9X is a missile not an airplane. saying it will be a good dogfight because of it it makes no sense.
@@riskinhosI don't think the U.S. is willing to build a fighter that can't fight within visual range IF it needs to. So I'm not willing to say NGAD won't be a good dogfighter. I'm thinking it will probably have some sort of area denial weapons system that can fire in all directions. Maybe lasers, or even sonic weapons. A plane doesn't have to maneuver to dogfight you if it has onboard weapon systems that can swivel 360° and blow you out of the sky at any aspect.
yes the Peregrines are high off bore sight. They are not as maneuverable as the aim-9 but close. The NGAD dogfight characteristics change quite a bit with fuel level. Because it carries such a large amount internally. It becomes a very good dogfighter at low fuel. NGAD really has to do things poorly to end up in a dogfight. The problem is that it is so powerful it can nearly beat its missiles to the target if you dont turn cold.
Satellites: The Iranians are believed to be have gotten anti-satellite missiles from Russia/China. To protect from this potential threat, intelligence sats over Iran have been moved to a different orbit and less critical assets have been used to gather intelligence/reconnaissance.
Russia and China's help? I thought they have their own, because they sent satellites to space, so they can probably shoot some down too using similar tech.
You're right Cap that if you made these war scenarios ultra realistic is would be very boring. Especially since most countries aren't willing to put up their fighters to oppose an American led attack since they know most will get shot down. So it's basically the American led attack going against enemy SAMs. And most of those would either be taken out by TLAMs, JASSMs, HARMS, ect or be rendered almost useless by jamming and stealth aircraft.
in reality the Isfahan nuclear enrichment facility is hundreds of meters underground making it invulnerable to almost any conventional munition. Those B2s would have to fly in with specialised bunker busting nuclear gravity bombs each weighing 10 tons. meaning they'd have to get within visual range of the target to hit it. That would have made this a challenge.
If they decide to use a nuke they'd probably drop a couple B61-11's from B-2/21's, these weigh about 1200 lbs. They probably can be GPS guided so could be launched from a little ways off.
@@myke5696 a surface detonation won't cut it, it'd have to be a penetrating detonation. And thats assuming you got the underground coordinate correct. Missing by a few dozen meters would make it more or less ineffective.
I'd be far more concerned about Iranian Saqr 358 Loitering AAMs which are basically AIM9s crossed with a lancet drone. They're so small and cheap they could create an airborne minefield where if any plane flies through it, they run the risk of being snapshotted by a Hob.
Am I alone or does anyone else think that the destruction models should be more diverse? Somehow every destroyed plane looks the same... no variation... Or is it to casual?! :D
Serious question: What could be the possible aftermath of such an attack with a country like Iran losing their entire airforce after having lost their Navy? Who would be most likely to take advantage?
Ich bin glücklich when flybywire is in a video. Dunno why. His cheeriness is just infectious. I imagine him as the stereotypical jolly German in lederhosen and a cap with a feather in it holding a bier stein.
Ew. #1 We DON'T speak that stuff you just said at the beginning (I did take one year of THAT language and HATED IT) SUCH an ANGRY sounding language 😂😂. #2 NO. JUST NO. I ABSOLUTELY HATE hearing "flythesenuts" talk. His voice is like hearing sandpaper on a chalkboard. I cringe every time Cap says his name or he opens his stupid 👄 mouth.
SO 🤣 i Lifed some year in Baveria but im not your typicle South german guy i´m from the MidWest of germany ( Ruhrgebiet ) , i dont have a lederhosen that a baverian thing but i love my beer , Ramstein and good dark Jocks 😅.
Roleplay: Elon's orbiting tesla exploded, shrapnel damaged large numbers of satellites. And he refuses to fix them until we agree that "X" was a good idea.😂
The optical and infrared satellite can be "easily" blind with a big enough laser, the concept have been tested I think in USSR and probably china as the orbit of a satellite can be predicted and followed easily with a big enough radar, the laser part is tricky as it would need a lot of power but as it's ground base and not unlikely possible. whats left are radar satellite but they probably lack the definition for confirming the objectives is real
Great work as always. If one day you can do a night ww2 carrier battle with US vs Japan my life will be achieved. If not a night bvr fight would be awesome.
Friggen solar storm! Thankfully our Ionosphere kept us from being irradiated down here on Earth, but they sure did wreak hell on satellite communications....
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Part 2 of the battle: ruclips.net/video/a2YCWnqqWYk/видео.html (shows 20th December)
Link says “Video is Private”….can’t watch, pls fix Cap? Thx
@@dexlab7539:( waiting for it too
It IS the 20th of December in my neck of the woods. Video still says "Video Unavailable" followed by "This video is Private". Simply supporting the other two comments on this. One from 21 hours ago, the other from 4 hours ago. Perhaps you meant "shows 21 December"???
Maybe it's Hawaiian time?
Bumping thread bc no part 2 as of december 22th
Bold of Cap to assume that this much of the Iranian airforce could actually fly 😂😂
I'd say 66% of it could fly. Some of it might only just beat the flight record of the first aircraft ever, and some might beat the Christmas Miracle....
Better be safe than be sorry
They literally drilled holes through the pressure hull on their submarines to run shore power because maintenance issues would let them run on internal power.
Sock is in college? Barber or clown? Jk good for him
The f4 could live on with modern missles and datalink as just absolute missle trucks.
Merry Christmas 🎁🎄
🇨🇦 Veteran(Rob) 🎅
Happy Christmas Grim Reapers. Thanks for this years enjoyable entertainment and laughs. Looking forward to what you bring us in 2024.
You too :)
This might be my favorite war game ever 😂😂😂 you got the whole crew, some beautiful future/concept planes, loads of funny glitches and commentary, and most importantly, maximum boom boom!
since fuel has always been an issue in all the missions especially with the 5th gen aircraft not having enough fuel due to increased RCS if they carry external tanks, I was wondering if you would be able to simulate the airforces new low drag and pylon program slated for the f22 upgrade and how that would affect the navy especially in the pacific theatre. thanks. love your content
The B1R reminds me of Dale Brown's B1C Excalibur in the "Flight of the Old Dog" sequel novels. It would have been SUCH a badass low level penetration strike bomber with standoff defenses that it's downright painful the B1R never happened.
I’m a big fan of all of those books! So much potential! B-1!
Can’t go 1,500 mph on the deck, unfortunately.
The production model would probably've been called B-1S (Bones) instead of B-1R (Bon*r).
@@sonar357 lololol. Have a nice weekend.
Love that book, bought it when it came out and still have it, great story!!
Yay Sock is back! Between Sock's colorful comments and Grumpnik my heart gets full
Agreed
Mach 500!? That’s nearly as fast as the Parker Solar Probe at perihelion and you’ll fly straight out of the solar system if you went that fast around Earth.
The speed of light is about mach 875000
@@BruhMomentPatrick I am working on it. Give it time.
Now I’m curious, since you said the your simulated F-35 is starting to outperform the F-22 would you be able to put them against each other so we can see how much each has changed/hasn’t changed.
The problem I've got is that the golden rule of youtube is that you are not allowed to show the F-22 lose a battle, ever. I've lost thousands of subscribers through non-scripted dogfight videos where F-22 loses. No longer willing to do it TBH.
@@grimreapersSpeaking as an American, that's just sad to hear people leave a channel because their favorite plane didn't win in a digital simulator
@@grimreapers Oh boy. Too many emotional peeps around here. I like your scenarios as it gives any airframe a chance. I likw what ifs. Ahh well.
@@grimreapers do it on another channel
@@wolfgangjr74 just imagine when shithole ameritarida loses
I think a better explanation for why the satellites didn't pick up the test site would be to have three separate test sites and then have one of them randomly be generated to be THE target and "found" 10 minutes into the mission
Human procedural generation of mission objectives lol! Once in a while may be more fun than expected and more realistic.
In reality nothing goes to plan right?
Still love these scenario too
My college years are some of my best memories.
I wish you success on your endeavors.
Congratulations on completing your first semester at college @dampsock! I'm on winter break as well. I'm close to completing my BA in Psychology. I started going back to school part time in the mid 2010's and I am almost done! Enjoy your break sir! 🙂
To go around the world in one second you have to go about mach 117,767.2
Which is 1/7 of the speed of light
The SR-72s are carrying the improved version of the ASAT missiles first tested on the F-15s.😂😂 You know I was thinking about how the B-52 used to have a tail gunner, or radar guided tail gun. Could you imagine if the B-oneR had a directed energy "Laser" tail gun?
If houthis keep stopping traffic for the Suez Canal, can we see what an Egyptian response might be in Yemen. And if not too big, how this might change with Iranian Air Force involvement or at least, threat.
Satellites cant be used because the tech needed to see deep enough into the mountains are ground penetrating radar, and since rock is so dense, you have to be much closer than a satellite can go - square-cube law with radio wave amplitude.
Happy to hear Sock again. 🤗
YES FINALLY!!! Thanks CAP!!! I have been waiting on something like this forever. Really appreciate you and your Team! Thanks Team GR!
Just came across this channel, you guys come up with a lot of interesting scenario and I had no idea all of these mods existed for DCS.
I've still got to wonder what Boeing was thinking when they pitched the B-1R back all those years ago. B-ONE-R? Someone must have gotten a laugh out of that.
I've been watching your channel for 2 years. Great stuff. I subscribe.
Epic battle, Cap! Looking forward to Part 2. One thing to note though that according to Alex Hollings' excellent research on the Sr-72, it was always meant to be able to be able to carry weapons. But then again, that would make for a boring video wouldnt it?
Fair comment. We have so many other cool weapons platforms (B-21/B-1R/NGAD etc) that I thought it would be fun to keep the SR-72 as purely a spy plane like the SR-71.
This has the makings of a great mission - can't wait! (esp keen on the Mach 500!)
Enjoyed the vid, the only minor issue i have and have had, is that realistically this raid would have been done in the dark of night (2am-4am), however i do understand that this would have been no fun for the players and you audience. So, please take my observation with maybe a grain of salt. 😂
Fck yo observation! 😅
player wise flying at night can be very fun. but from a filming stand point for the viewers it dosen't make for very easy to watch content.. cheers and thanks for watching
I actually love night missions, and I agree most Western missions would be at night. But yes obviously would cause problems for video/viewers.
This is so unrealistic! I did not see one flying carpet nor Toyota truck with wings.
Annnnd de-monetized...
That just reminds me of a certain Robin Reliant "Rocket"
Are all those 41 Tomcats actually operational? Or are they residents of a parts cannibalism park?
we have only 8 operational
Yes.
Great video. Wish I could have been there!
I wonder if the SR-72s are here just to impress viewers?... like me. 😅 Amazing those fly-bys!
Yup
That was awesome! Just subscribed! 😁😎
Satellites cant be used because - Their Scuds blocks out the sun? (Sparta!!!)
FOR SPARTA!
Simba impresses me every time.
Eh...
@@Triggatra4258 I Eh... to your Eh... and raise you one hmmm.
@@simba1113 😂😂 Uh-oh!! I see you BIG MONEY BAGS!! 💰💰💰 Lol Nah bro I'm just 🤡ing around, 🫵🏾 and ALL of GR are 🔥🔥 pilots, ship captains and idk about tank drivers? Y'all don't any tank battles anymore but that's ok because I come here for the aircraft battles mostly then the surface vessels unless you're doing both at the same time. Anyways lemme STFU and you get back to greatness lol The People's CHAMP! PLUS you're AMERICAN like me!!! I'm from ATL, GA but live in Virginia now. Used to be in the Air Force myself, stationed at Shaw Air Force Base in Sumter, SC.
@@simba1113 What is your AFSC by the way? I'm 1A9X1- Special Mission Aviator
re. Blocking satellite reconissance
Dazzling (or permenantly blinding) photoreconissance spy satellites with lasers is reportedly under active development by certain countries (and has been hypothesised in fiction since the '80s). That should provide a realistic reason for no satellite reconissance in the mission roleplay.
I supose we won? it stopped abruply! but well done and have a very nice xmas! salutes! from Sweden! 🥰
Sorry, end scene didn't seem to work for some reason but this is Part 1 of the battle. Part 2 will release soon.
God damn I missed you guys my new phone didn't get all of channels and I never got any notifications
Actually the B-21 is already being deployed to air force bases right now. My brother is an airman at Whitemans Air Force base in Missouri, and they are already planning to faze out the B-2 this year. 2024
No way. It has to be tested for years yet!
Best one so far, ( really cool)
There was once a battle with Iran and U.S. when the Iranians planted a bunch of mines in the sea and a U.S. Destroyer got hit by it. As a "proportional response" U.S. destroyed half of their Navy in 24 hours.
Was this map near Abu Dhabi or Dubai cuz I seen a landmark that look exactly like one of the huge palm tree island they have their
Mach 500... Is it a tic-tac?
Yup
@@grimreapers Sweet!
The OG crew back together
hey cap
I recently saw a tweet about drones in the countermeasure pods instead of flares/chaff.
Would this be possible to model in DCS? (cant post the link here)
Will investigate but doubt it TBH.
I don't think that nuclear weapons/facilities would be that close to the border?? Loved this none the less thank you!!
The purple livery is awesome! I like your style Cap
One small error in your war simulation, its highly unlikely that Iran has any AIM154 Phoenixes left for her F14's. And I doubt that they kept some, if they are even functional after 50 years of rusting in storage. Let alone that they will be able to get a good radar lock on any 5th generation stealth fighter especially 160 miles off, which is the maximum firing range for this old air to air missile.
Son of Blackbird is beautiful.
5:26 A few weeks ago Russia used some sort of radar interference system to prevent satellite imaging of Crimea, presumably for some specific type of radar system or frequency. I can't find the video now but it looked like someone had scratched up the image with a fork.
Is it just me or this video simply cuts short at 41:28...? What is this? No explanation or anything. Judging by the comments, nobody else had that problem.
Sorry, end scene didn't seem to work for some reason but this is Part 1 of the battle. Part 2 will release soon.
Wow! I sincerely appreciate Dark talking normally (i.e., very little vocal fry)! Enjoyed the vid! Just out of curiosity, wouldn't they use ships and cruise missiles?
cruise missiles to hit fighter aircraft? what?
@@riskinhos No. To destroy the nuclear facility.
Bro the main point of DCS is FLIGHT ✈️🛫 (FLYING AIRCRAFT) So yeah in a REAL LIFE situation or IF they were trying to be realistic they would have used some type of cruise missile or other air to ground munition...but this AIN'T real life and they AIN'T trying to be realistic. Also NOBODY wants to watch a video with them JUST shooting some cruise missiles. The whole video would only be like 10 minutes or less. And LAME. 🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️👎🏾 JUST. LIKE. 🫵🏾 YOU 🫵🏾 🤡🤡
@@riskinhos😂😂😂😂 That would be some ish wouldn't it?
Riskinhos make a good point. Cruise missiles have neither the guidance systems nor kinematics necessary to intercept fighter jets. And how on earth could the ships be delivered to target? They weigh tens of thousands of tons! Any launch or propulsion system that could handle that kind of weight is many, many decades away.
40:25 Did the video prematurely end???? I need to see the end! 😢
Ask the same?????
Sorry, end scene didn't seem to work for some reason but this is Part 1 of the battle. Part 2 will release soon.
The F-4s and Saeghes say hello. It's underground, hence the satellite would mistake it for a bunker
Tell me why I get slightly upset that Iran owns a version of my beloved f14 tomcat
You're not alone my good sir.
I can definitely understand you , but she is a beautiful plane anyway
@@FlybywireTheGerman MORE beautiful in the hands of Tom Cruise though 😉
@@Triggatra4258agreed 😌😁
They bought them back when they were one of the good ones
Replace the ngad with the Black widow/ gray ghost(projected production model weaponry) with adaptive cycle engines
IRL I would think NGADs would be good dogfighters if they have AIM-9X because they could see and shoot in all directions at once *don't KNOW if Peregrines have the same targeting capability - shrug - they probably do.
no vertical stabilisers. you can't change the laws of physics. obviously they will dogfight a lot worse. which is irrelevant because they weren't design for that role and won't do it. other aircraft will also have the AIM-9X. AIM-9X is a missile not an airplane. saying it will be a good dogfight because of it it makes no sense.
@@riskinhosI don't think the U.S. is willing to build a fighter that can't fight within visual range IF it needs to. So I'm not willing to say NGAD won't be a good dogfighter.
I'm thinking it will probably have some sort of area denial weapons system that can fire in all directions. Maybe lasers, or even sonic weapons. A plane doesn't have to maneuver to dogfight you if it has onboard weapon systems that can swivel 360° and blow you out of the sky at any aspect.
yes the Peregrines are high off bore sight. They are not as maneuverable as the aim-9 but close. The NGAD dogfight characteristics change quite a bit with fuel level. Because it carries such a large amount internally. It becomes a very good dogfighter at low fuel.
NGAD really has to do things poorly to end up in a dogfight. The problem is that it is so powerful it can nearly beat its missiles to the target if you dont turn cold.
I wonder where fly was too
you will have fun in part 2
Hey cap, do you know why the vsn_F35 isn't working? Is there an update i missed?
Satellites: The Iranians are believed to be have gotten anti-satellite missiles from Russia/China. To protect from this potential threat, intelligence sats over Iran have been moved to a different orbit and less critical assets have been used to gather intelligence/reconnaissance.
Maybe the tunnels dug are so deep and extensive that satellite based ground penetrating radar cant see them.
Russia and China's help?
I thought they have their own, because they sent satellites to space, so they can probably shoot some down too using similar tech.
You're right Cap that if you made these war scenarios ultra realistic is would be very boring. Especially since most countries aren't willing to put up their fighters to oppose an American led attack since they know most will get shot down. So it's basically the American led attack going against enemy SAMs. And most of those would either be taken out by TLAMs, JASSMs, HARMS, ect or be rendered almost useless by jamming and stealth aircraft.
I have done a few ones before that I consider pretty realistic, and they get almost no YT views and most people said they are boring.
unfortunate. i’d love to see something super realistic
@@grimreapers Would you mind linking a best example?
Like how 9 us aircraft losses cost more than the entire Iranian air force.
Is there still a grim reapers training page in discord o haven’t played in a while and really want to start again
Yes Sir
in reality the Isfahan nuclear enrichment facility is hundreds of meters underground making it invulnerable to almost any conventional munition. Those B2s would have to fly in with specialised bunker busting nuclear gravity bombs each weighing 10 tons. meaning they'd have to get within visual range of the target to hit it. That would have made this a challenge.
If they decide to use a nuke they'd probably drop a couple B61-11's from B-2/21's, these weigh about 1200 lbs. They probably can be GPS guided so could be launched from a little ways off.
Actually that's a great idea for a follow up. GBU down a vent shaft?
@@myke5696 a surface detonation won't cut it, it'd have to be a penetrating detonation. And thats assuming you got the underground coordinate correct. Missing by a few dozen meters would make it more or less ineffective.
@@grimreapers yeah basically doing an IRL deathstar trench run at a vent only a few meters across vertically
College? Damp is in college? He sounds like the guy Dauber from the show Coach.
378 ai nato missiles, hit rate of 60% is 226.8 hits, yeah i think theres enough
Assuming that each missile is fired at a different target
The F-15EX just chillin all lonely on the flight line. Poor guy.
The purple “the people’s champ” is so clean 🔩
Cap Iran does have 24 Chinese multirole Chengdu J-7. I don't know if that would make a difference or not. I thought I would throw it out there.
It wouldn't. Those are essentially just updated mig-21's.
What about the fighters they get from Russia for all the drones?
Roger the J-7 is the Chinese Mig-21
Wiki says the su-35's have not yet arrived from Russia.
I'd be far more concerned about Iranian Saqr 358 Loitering AAMs which are basically AIM9s crossed with a lancet drone.
They're so small and cheap they could create an airborne minefield where if any plane flies through it, they run the risk of being snapshotted by a Hob.
"Mach reading please"
"Mach: Yes"
Can you do a Dogfight Simulation of alot of the YF22 Raptor VS the YF23 Black Widow II Aircraft someday???
Congrats Sock!
Hey so is this like head to head game simulator or something?? I’m confused
Do you do videos on how to get into dcs?
Am I alone or does anyone else think that the destruction models should be more diverse?
Somehow every destroyed plane looks the same... no variation... Or is it to casual?! :D
Fair comment.
Isn't f-35 (and a few other aircraft) capable of making off-bore shots? Not modeled in dcs, I gather?
Off-bore?
@@Yokoboy045 exactly. Thanks, corrected the autocorrect.
Yup up to about 90 degrees off-bore.
Very interesting content
Part 2?
Editing it now...
@@grimreapers Awesome! Thanks.
Dude!
What is this game called, and where can I get it?
You should have the B-21 with the mirror coating.
agreed
What happened to the nuke plant?
Part 2 of battle shows in a couple of days.
Serious question: What could be the possible aftermath of such an attack with a country like Iran losing their entire airforce after having lost their Navy? Who would be most likely to take advantage?
How about the Ccpee?
refuelling tankers?
Ich bin glücklich when flybywire is in a video. Dunno why. His cheeriness is just infectious. I imagine him as the stereotypical jolly German in lederhosen and a cap with a feather in it holding a bier stein.
Ew. #1 We DON'T speak that stuff you just said at the beginning (I did take one year of THAT language and HATED IT) SUCH an ANGRY sounding language 😂😂. #2 NO. JUST NO. I ABSOLUTELY HATE hearing "flythesenuts" talk. His voice is like hearing sandpaper on a chalkboard. I cringe every time Cap says his name or he opens his stupid 👄 mouth.
Auch bin in gluechlich!
SO 🤣 i Lifed some year in Baveria but im not your typicle South german guy i´m from the MidWest of germany ( Ruhrgebiet ) , i dont have a lederhosen that a baverian thing but i love my beer , Ramstein and good dark Jocks 😅.
Roleplay: Elon's orbiting tesla exploded, shrapnel damaged large numbers of satellites. And he refuses to fix them until we agree that "X" was a good idea.😂
Broooooooooooooo 😂😂😂😂
I wish you a cappy Christmas
The optical and infrared satellite can be "easily" blind with a big enough laser, the concept have been tested I think in USSR and probably china as the orbit of a satellite can be predicted and followed easily with a big enough radar, the laser part is tricky as it would need a lot of power but as it's ground base and not unlikely possible. whats left are radar satellite but they probably lack the definition for confirming the objectives is real
Great work as always. If one day you can do a night ww2 carrier battle with US vs Japan my life will be achieved. If not a night bvr fight would be awesome.
To you guys as i understud Cap he will uploud the video in tow Parts , cause it was prety long mission , We flown nerly 2 houers
Sorry, end scene didn't seem to work for some reason but this is Part 1 of the battle. Part 2 will release soon.
Requesting ww2 aircraft with modern technology like advanced bombs missiles and other types
What about the F-24?
Friggen solar storm! Thankfully our Ionosphere kept us from being irradiated down here on Earth, but they sure did wreak hell on satellite communications....
Why no f-22s?
Those Raiders looked like they were trying to dogfight lmao
Damp Hypoxi Sock?
I doubt that Iran would even know the US is coming until the attack happens. From that point the fight is already over and there is chaos in the air
I wish you could of added a ssgn
Why veteran skill level not max?
Cause Iran Airfoce is not as well trained as the US Airforce , the interesting part was the 7:1 ratio of planes
What if Spartacus had a piper cub?
so what happend the vid stoped.
Sorry, end scene didn't seem to work for some reason but this is Part 1 of the battle. Part 2 will release soon.
What game is this
just a side note. Iranian Mig29s only have r27 and r73
Hello, if at all possible, I would like to fly with you guys in some of your mission's if possible, please