Modern Lightning ‘Like’ Performance on a Budget | 5 Star Modded 2.7L F-150

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 июл 2020
  • From one Lightning owner to someone buying a modern rival to that SVT Legend, let me tell you this truck is sweet. With minimal mods; including conservative 5 Star Tuning via HP Tuners, an intercooler, upgraded turbos, and an S&B Intake, this truck is delivering impressive performance. Check out the full article on SVTP by clicking the link below:
    www.svtperformance.com/thread...
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 200

  • @csford9893
    @csford9893 3 года назад +49

    I love the Simplicity of an XL single cab. Call me old-fashioned but just something about buying a stock truck with rubber floors and adding your own custom upgrades to higher trim models. The only thing I would change would be 4x4 or a rear differential lock and 6 speed manual

    • @joshuapisani1853
      @joshuapisani1853 3 года назад +2

      at around 09:54 in the video, it looks like the rear diff lock icon is shown where the 4x4 selection would normally be, with what appears to be "off" and "on" you could turn the knob to. So maybe the only thing missing is the manual?
      EDIT: Confirmed. 3.55 with Electronic locking rear axle - timestamped at 01:20

    • @jedpony
      @jedpony 3 года назад

      You can't get the 6-speed auto trans with the 2.7L or 3.5L EcoBoost (or 5.0L V-8). They all are only available with the 10-speed auto. The base naturally aspirated V-6 is still available with a 6-speed auto

    • @caperformance_motorsports
      @caperformance_motorsports 3 года назад +2

      @@jedpony lmao I have a 2017 2.7 6speed

    • @mattjingles5758
      @mattjingles5758 2 года назад

      @@jedpony yes you can lol

  • @blkfeet29
    @blkfeet29 3 года назад +13

    I love 5 star tuning. I have been running their tunes for 5 years now and have had zero issues!

  • @FloridaCoastalGuy
    @FloridaCoastalGuy 3 года назад +23

    My stock 2018 F-150 FX4 Regular Cab SWB 2.7L 10-Speed 3.55:1
    24,500 miles and I’ve only installed a new battery, no leaks, no problems at all.
    0-60 = 5.9 Seconds ¼ mile = 14.4 Seconds 93 Octane 25.4 mpg is the best average mileage I've got.
    G-Tech Pro SS Performance meter

    • @kevinanglin678
      @kevinanglin678 3 года назад

      Stock besides magnaflow exhaust 18 f150 5.0 fx4 3.55 gears 0-60 5.30 1/4 mile 13.55 93 gas no e85 in my state 1500 rpm launch I probably could have gotten at 13.50 if launched at a higher rpm you got me on gas mileage tho best I've got on back roads cruising around at 55 to 60 mph is 23 mpg on interstate driving I get about 20-21 at 70 mph

  • @mindspinn311
    @mindspinn311 3 года назад +25

    I would absolutely buy this truck. XL regular cab short wheelbase with the 2.7 turbo instead of the 3.3 is a perfect combination.

    • @Highlander1432
      @Highlander1432 3 месяца назад

      35k msrp then how much they tack on for the 5 star package ?

  • @ajmedeiros77
    @ajmedeiros77 3 года назад +44

    2.7 is such a well built engine! Wish they put it in the ranger.

    • @nathant2414
      @nathant2414 3 года назад +4

      Bronco is getting it... and the next Gen ranger too

    • @robertramirez7828
      @robertramirez7828 2 года назад +4

      I stand with your statement. Putting the 2.3 in the ranger was such a let down

    • @coltonray1
      @coltonray1 2 года назад +1

      @@robertramirez7828 I was pleasantly surprised out of the 2.3 in the 19 ranger while I had it

    • @mdubz101
      @mdubz101 2 года назад +1

      @@robertramirez7828 she actually is tough, and I don’t see them being repaired constantly like the rest of the boosted ford family

  • @poorperformance8850
    @poorperformance8850 2 года назад

    Just bought black 2020 super cab 2.7 from capitol this week. Absolutely love the technology in these new vehicles. I might have to void my warranty 👀

  • @AG-rk5hj
    @AG-rk5hj 3 года назад +7

    Man I’d love to have that F-150😍

  • @eriktyler2358
    @eriktyler2358 2 года назад +2

    Damn, if I saw this truck at the dealer I’d totally buy it!

  • @ftby59mikeD
    @ftby59mikeD 2 года назад +1

    Nice truck! I owned an '01 Lightning, no mods, it was quick but love my '15 2.7 Scab. More practical w/better mpg's & reasonably fast.
    I suppose the newest Lightning is 'stupid' fast!

  • @dlg5485
    @dlg5485 Год назад +9

    Since the updated version came out I think in 2018, I've been in love with the 2.7. It's very quick, built super strong enough to handle extreme tuning and it gets excellent fuel mileage. I don't know why everyone still gaga over the 5.0, the only thing it has going for it is the sound and that ain't everything. Since Ford added cylinder deactivation, the 5.0 has been a total lemon. The 2.7 is the only engine I'd get in the F150.

  • @renerodriguez1876
    @renerodriguez1876 Год назад

    That truck is a beauty

  • @FastlifeTodd
    @FastlifeTodd 3 года назад

    This is a cool unit !

  • @toddrodgers908
    @toddrodgers908 2 года назад

    I live on a mountain. I have a 2014 Ford F150 Platinum 3.5 Ecoboost with only 32K miles on it. With a S&B cold air intake, 5 Star 87 Eco tune and a oil separator catch can. I baby it everywhere. And going to town and back I'm lucky at 13 MPG. On the interstate I get mid to upper 16's MPG at 65 to 68 MPH. It does have a Retrax aluminum bed cover. I've also ordered a 4 inch MBRP flow through exhaust. That will be here Saturday. If I don't start to get some fairly good gas mileage out of it. That will be that last of any upgrades. Because I also pull my aluminum 17ft bass boat in the warmer months. And it drops to even less gas mileage.

  • @bonn1771
    @bonn1771 3 года назад

    very nice truck! great budget truck

  • @rdsii64
    @rdsii64 2 года назад +9

    I know this an old video. With that said, my truck is a 2018 crewcab 4x4 with the 2.7L. My truck weighs much more than that regular cab and I can get 29.5 mph traveling between Jacksonville NC and Havelock NC, So 30 MPG with this truck is a walk in the park. After having mine for a year, I will never go back to a NA V8 truck. Trucks and turbos go together like peanut butter and jelly.

  • @mattyfresh9698
    @mattyfresh9698 3 года назад +55

    Me: (drops pants)
    Her: 8:51

  • @ViperVenom
    @ViperVenom 3 года назад +3

    love that color

  • @carpentierjohn7
    @carpentierjohn7 3 года назад

    beautiful color

  • @mmahtnart8986
    @mmahtnart8986 2 года назад

    I like the truck. I would buy one.

  • @cljerjr31
    @cljerjr31 4 года назад +2

    great sport truck

  • @rendiewmit86
    @rendiewmit86 3 года назад

    Did they only lower the rear with the shackles? Nothing different with the front?

  • @tylerball2902
    @tylerball2902 3 года назад

    Is there an exhaust system on this truck or is that just the intake?

  • @AnthonyGrift
    @AnthonyGrift 3 года назад +1

    What make, model and size are the rims? Thank you

  • @vincentmeredith2561
    @vincentmeredith2561 3 года назад +1

    Shit I was gonna wait til the 2022 came out to get one after they figure out that they should paint the rear ends again. But kinda wanting a 2020 now cause that thing looks aggressive

  • @nicholasfrisch244
    @nicholasfrisch244 2 года назад +2

    Do you know what size wheels and tires this has?

  • @camberwellcarrot420
    @camberwellcarrot420 3 года назад +2

    It's damned near old school looking.

  • @Highlander1432
    @Highlander1432 3 месяца назад

    Can it run E85 blend ?
    If not then not worth it.
    E50 tuned 2.7 on stock turbos would smack this thing around

  • @shelbyflf
    @shelbyflf 3 года назад

    Will it pass smog in California?

  • @thedukeofconway4209
    @thedukeofconway4209 2 года назад +1

    Badass Muscle Truck

  • @eazytoribio2695
    @eazytoribio2695 Год назад

    Can you tell me what the name of that color is? It’s super cool perfect for this truck

  • @uppastdawn7627
    @uppastdawn7627 3 года назад +5

    Call me old fashioned, but I can remember when a headlight was just a headlight!

    • @serenityinsilence
      @serenityinsilence 3 года назад +1

      Modern halogen headlights have terrible forward visibility. That’s why so many people choose to upgrade to LED headlights. It’s the difference between trying to light your way with a candle, or light your way with a flashlight. Candles will do the job, but they aren’t exactly the best.

  • @elchucofried5683
    @elchucofried5683 3 года назад +5

    I would get the extended cab but dope truck. I want to tune my Bronco when I get it.

    • @Drunken_Hamster
      @Drunken_Hamster 2 года назад

      I'd only get a SCAB if they still offered them with the 5.5 foot bed.

  • @nathant2414
    @nathant2414 3 года назад

    You remind me of Justin Keith haha “very nice”

  • @mdrodriguezmr
    @mdrodriguezmr Год назад

    wheel and tire size?

  • @n0ypi1
    @n0ypi1 2 года назад

    How much all in all for everything?

  • @843cuh9
    @843cuh9 2 года назад +1

    Stage 3 turbos for only 450 hp ?

  • @scottadkins918
    @scottadkins918 2 года назад

    Very nice color... What color is this?

  • @rolieg81
    @rolieg81 Год назад +1

    Beautiful unicorn 🦄

  • @motorhead_jt21
    @motorhead_jt21 3 года назад +14

    Maaaaannn I can’t wait to have this in the new Bronco

    • @quinton8312
      @quinton8312 3 года назад +3

      Have it in my new f150 you’ll love it

    • @dwightk.schruteiii8454
      @dwightk.schruteiii8454 3 года назад +1

      Duuuuuude same 😍 getting a 2 door 2.7 Blackdiamond

    • @MrJoshiba26
      @MrJoshiba26 3 года назад

      Exactly why I'm here watching this. Lol 2.7 base model 2 door

    • @holdmybeer1336
      @holdmybeer1336 3 года назад

      Haha same here !!

    • @donaldbean6291
      @donaldbean6291 3 года назад

      @@dwightk.schruteiii8454 me too

  • @Vhifzvjif
    @Vhifzvjif 3 года назад +1

    just financed a 2012 f150 stx single cab, wouldve gotten a newer gen, but im 19 so ik the insurance would be high asf, ima be paying $170 a month for liability.

  • @vincentgirard99
    @vincentgirard99 2 года назад

    Where can I buy 1

  • @michaeldrevyankosr6180
    @michaeldrevyankosr6180 3 года назад +5

    The 2021 3.5 eco boost stock is 400 hp , 500 ft lbs torque . Full warranty

    • @SVTPerformance
      @SVTPerformance  3 года назад +3

      Can't be had in this configuration.

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад +1

      You can’t get the 3.5 in a single cab with the 6 1/2 ft bed, you can if you get the 8 foot bed but who wants an 8 foot bed if you don’t need it.

    • @ClawDogVending
      @ClawDogVending 3 года назад +1

      Explain the full warranty to all the 5.0 owners who are a quart low on oil.

    • @joshuaearnheart2756
      @joshuaearnheart2756 3 года назад

      @@ClawDogVending there’s very few and ford takes care of them

  • @EcoBoost27
    @EcoBoost27 3 года назад +1

    Nice!

  • @wgxinc
    @wgxinc 4 месяца назад

    Peopñe are getting over 20mpg in this truck? !!! Im lucky to get 14 whats the deal?

  • @SAWashington67
    @SAWashington67 3 года назад +1

    I thought you couldn't purchase a combination . . Single cab and short-bed(5 1/2' box) with any car brand . . ??🤔 It always seems like if you want a single cab(w/any brand) it will always give you one option of a long bed(6 1/2' or larger box) . . So, I wonder how did that truck happen . . ??🤔

  • @roxanaduran5736
    @roxanaduran5736 3 года назад

    I have the same truck same modification. My is black

  • @jocivtrance3455
    @jocivtrance3455 3 года назад

    The Blue Shark

  • @michaeldrevyankosr6180
    @michaeldrevyankosr6180 3 года назад

    Does the tune and new turbos void the factory warranty?

  • @296skipweld
    @296skipweld 2 года назад +1

    Is that a factory paint code ? Love that blue , I had a 99 civic si that was electron blue pearl & I loved that color

    • @scottadkins918
      @scottadkins918 2 года назад +1

      I was wondering the same but I cant seem to find that color.

    • @296skipweld
      @296skipweld 2 года назад

      @@scottadkins918 please lmk if you do find it

    • @scottadkins918
      @scottadkins918 2 года назад

      @@296skipweld gotta be a vinyl wrap or custom paint... I dont see no factory color like that.

    • @wethepeople406
      @wethepeople406 2 года назад +2

      Looks like velocity blue

  • @dougms9790
    @dougms9790 4 года назад +3

    Numbers on dyno chart don't add up. Ford website says this engine makes 325hp and 400hp, guessing that's at flywheel. This chart says 321hp and 287trq at the WHEEL? The HP reading is almost the same.

    • @SVTPerformance
      @SVTPerformance  4 года назад

      Ford is known to under rate their engines, and the TQ number you're quoting isn't the peak number.

    • @tybailey9428
      @tybailey9428 3 года назад +1

      Lol yoy forget the magic of the 10r80 and ford always underrated their engines. In theory you have less drive train loss through the 10r80 than you do a manual

    • @wayneswasey3256
      @wayneswasey3256 3 года назад

      Ford says 325 go 400 torque

  • @stedco75
    @stedco75 3 года назад +13

    Nice truck, but no way is that thing getting 30mpg. My stock 2.7 2wd is only averaging about 23 with quite a bit of highway driving.

    • @Pipe-Layer
      @Pipe-Layer 3 года назад +4

      I definitely agree with ya on that.

    • @dontask8979
      @dontask8979 3 года назад +3

      My stock 3.5 EcoBoost can get 24, but I get bored.😎
      Stuck going 55 mpg for 20 miles and I was getting 27.
      That said... 19 to 24 driving my way.

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад +1

      Mine does

    • @billandalona
      @billandalona 2 года назад

      Shit i wish I only get about 19 that’s combined city and highway and I drive like a grandpa

    • @weskirkland5850
      @weskirkland5850 2 года назад

      what body does your truck have and trim level? rcsb xl will get better mileage than any other version.

  • @autohoopla5200
    @autohoopla5200 3 года назад +2

    You say a CNR stage 3 turbo upgrade? I have intake, exhaust, tune, and soon the intercooler on 2018 2.7 EcoBoost supercrew and its peppy. No it won’t outrun any supercharged V8’s but for the price it can beat a few NA’s

    • @jedpony
      @jedpony 3 года назад +1

      The company name is C&R Performance. I have their downpipes with a SPD turbo adapters and stage 2 turbo wheel upgrades- among other upgrades on my 3.5L EcoBoost and it absolutely flies!

    • @843cuh9
      @843cuh9 2 года назад

      @@jedpony you did the billet wheels on stock turbos ? Did it give you any problems

  • @mccoyji
    @mccoyji 2 года назад

    35k to 60k?

  • @petrosspetrosgali
    @petrosspetrosgali 3 года назад

    Ok that’s odd that it’s a regular cab on the outside and in the interior shots it looks like there’s a tiny seat in the back. Did they extend the cab a few inches from 19-20?

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад

      No all brands that still make a single cab give you a little room behind the seat. It’s been like this for years

  • @waldomoser9727
    @waldomoser9727 3 года назад

    who makes those headlights

    • @ezio4470
      @ezio4470 3 года назад

      Those are Morimoto XB LED Headlights

  • @planetbern
    @planetbern 2 года назад +1

    I love 5 star and have this motor in my f150 but NEVA will you see 30mpg, maybe 🤔 down a mineshaft with a tailwind. Stock don’t see more that 21 ever and this is tuned.

    • @09roadraider40
      @09roadraider40 2 года назад

      All stock all original two-wheel drive 2.7 I get 30 MPG regular cab long bed 323 gears

  • @jesuscruz1475
    @jesuscruz1475 3 года назад +2

    Ford 150s #1 💪💪🇺🇲🇲🇽

  • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
    @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 3 года назад +13

    Hope all the dodge boys could watch this. They just don't get it.

    • @ahenseda
      @ahenseda 3 года назад

      Wait for it!!! Wait for it!!! FORD = Fix Or Repair Daily!!! Parts will be the money maker soon!!! Don't forget the duck-tape!!!😄🍼🍼

    • @serenityinsilence
      @serenityinsilence 3 года назад +1

      I had a 2014 ram 1500, I now drive a 2019 F-150 5.0 and also had a 2018 2.7 ecoboost before that.

    • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
      @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 3 года назад

      @@serenityinsilence you happy with it? I like mine alot I want the powerboost or the new lightning

  • @mattjingles5758
    @mattjingles5758 2 года назад

    is the 2.7 or the 3.5 better?

  • @truckerclock1654
    @truckerclock1654 3 года назад +2

    So a 75 HP gain and like 2 ft lbs? Cant a 5 star tune alone give you 50 HP? Seems like a lot of extra money and parts for that extra 25 horses.

    • @09roadraider40
      @09roadraider40 2 года назад

      Oh yes five Star can you get much more power and torque like he said in the video it is a conservative tune

  • @dontask8979
    @dontask8979 3 года назад +1

    I love videos that remind me how good of deal I got.
    My 4x4 3.5 EcoBoost was only 3k more, and its got 13k in options!

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад

      Mmkay 🤣🤣

  • @jezzie1965
    @jezzie1965 Год назад

    It’s peppy I bet it’s purdy too

  • @mmahtnart8986
    @mmahtnart8986 2 года назад

    Be an essential worker. Get a CDL and join the Teamsters.

  • @blackericdenice
    @blackericdenice 3 года назад +6

    They don't 30 mpg stock. Making 450hp? It might get 21 mpg.
    7:30 peppy is the reason it want get 30 mpg.

    • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
      @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 3 года назад +1

      Mine does! 13000 plus km to a tank on average and 9.3L/100 km at best over thousands of kms and multuple tanks! Blew my own mind. That is driving as good as possible too every second to attain 9.3 but its a full size crew cab 4x4 on 33" all terrain 10 plys so not too bad

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад +2

      Mine does

    • @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761
      @fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 3 года назад +1

      Mine too.

    • @12pawsinn
      @12pawsinn 2 года назад

      You're using the dash lie o meter ... 9.3 is 30 mpg but take 2 mpg off... still 28 mpg isn't bad!!! My 2016 sonato was getting 54 mpg.. im looking forward to my 22 fx4 3.5 tt

  • @drumtwo4seven
    @drumtwo4seven Год назад

    ALREADY MAKES 400 LB FEET OF TORQUE STOCK
    FROM STOCK 365 HO UP TO 452 IS AN INC OF 87 HP

    • @SVTPerformance
      @SVTPerformance  Год назад +1

      No cares about crank horsepower ratings, especially when compared to RWHP.

  • @wolfman._7396
    @wolfman._7396 2 года назад

    Leather interior or vinyl . But not the clothes interior

  • @JIMN26
    @JIMN26 Год назад +2

    Those are major mods and are pricey. And no, your not getting 30mpg with a 2.7. Lol. I have owned my 2015 2.7 twin turbo for nearly 3 years and averaging around 19 around town and 23 on the highway at best.

  • @zfullthrottled3015
    @zfullthrottled3015 2 года назад

    And turning the video off at “2.7L EcoBoost”!

  • @xXlURMOMlXx
    @xXlURMOMlXx 10 месяцев назад

    Today's trucks look so jank without a crew cab, such a shame they don't look as good as old single cab

  • @burquenos505
    @burquenos505 3 года назад +3

    37,000 ????? Want to buy

  • @poolguy101
    @poolguy101 3 года назад +2

    mpg is more like 20

  • @luisvilla799
    @luisvilla799 3 года назад +4

    Ford actually makes 2.7 regular cab & short bed???

    • @SVTPerformance
      @SVTPerformance  3 года назад +3

      Yep

    • @michaeldrevyankosr6180
      @michaeldrevyankosr6180 3 года назад +1

      I tried to get the short bed with the 3.5 eco boost, Ford will let you have the 2.7 or 5.0 na
      But not the 3.5

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад

      @@michaeldrevyankosr6180 you can only get the 3.5 in a single cab if you get the 8 foot bed

  • @architecturehappy
    @architecturehappy 3 года назад

    Bronco....yeehaw 🤤

  • @tgilly83
    @tgilly83 3 года назад +3

    Offset is so wrong on these wheels

  • @atomicorang
    @atomicorang 2 года назад

    It is a real shame the top of the engine is an absolute disaster. I the old days I would have done anything to clean it up and tidy things up. Apparently it’s impossible with the modern day electronics. I’m shocked no one has made an effort to do for any vehicle.

  • @luisvilla799
    @luisvilla799 3 года назад +1

    Shit I dont like Ford trucks but this one is nice!!!

  • @cozyboy7366
    @cozyboy7366 3 года назад

    what about the 3.7

  • @HotHeadCJ
    @HotHeadCJ 4 года назад +2

    30 MPG? I cant wait for this to be dropped into the ranger, I wonder if its lighter than a crew cab 4wd ranger?

    • @BeanoNoir
      @BeanoNoir 3 года назад +1

      It is lighter than all but a base Ranger 2wd in this configuration (F-150s are super light). 30mpg is pie in the sky unfortunately. High 20s, no problem though. This is the strongest stock block gas motor they have other than the 7.3L. 4 bolt mains with a CGI block and forged pistons, con rods crank and cams. Those numbers he showed looked like corrected numbers and not true at the wheel. That being said, it doesn't have a transfer case, and it has a short little drive shaft, so who knows.

    • @HotHeadCJ
      @HotHeadCJ 3 года назад

      @@stevenp3176 Interesting, I wonder how if the next gen will be lighter

    • @BeanoNoir
      @BeanoNoir 3 года назад

      @@HotHeadCJ Actually, most F-150's are significantly heavier than Rangers, But Rangers only have one wheelbase, which limits the range of curb weights. The F-150 in the video is the shortest wheelbase available (122") in base trim with manual seats, and is shorter than a Ranger. A 2wd Supercab Base Ranger will be lighter, but not much else. This truck likely has about a 4200- 4300lb curb weight. A 145" Wheelbase base F-150 w/4wheel drive is just under 5,000lbs, to just over with the bigger cab. It's not that the Ranger is heavy, the F-150 just has a myriad of options, and is extremely light for it's class. The 2004-2014 F-150s were pigs though.

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад

      @@BeanoNoir In today’s standards the ranger is in fact heavy for what it is, all of them are, the Tacoma, ranger, the gm twins and the ridgeline

    • @4touchdowns1game29
      @4touchdowns1game29 2 года назад

      @@BeanoNoir the 2.3 is also super solid if you swap out the block for the 2.0.

  • @Billyjack-Two-Crows
    @Billyjack-Two-Crows 3 года назад

    You Tac,ed the engine out with break in oil still in it? I wouldn't buy it knowing that.

    • @SVTPerformance
      @SVTPerformance  3 года назад +10

      Right, because no one drives vehicles before they make it to the dealer lot. Do yourself a favor and never watch the factory workers but a car/truck that just rolled off the line through an NVH test.

    • @birdsgarage3305
      @birdsgarage3305 3 года назад +2

      @@SVTPerformance You're right about that. I want to add to that: every new vehicle I've owned has left the dealer spinning the tires. They've never burned oil and always had great compression.

  • @peterbeertema6494
    @peterbeertema6494 3 года назад +1

    Easy 500 with E50

  • @robertwieczorek5838
    @robertwieczorek5838 3 года назад

    Electronic locker is not basic

  • @evChDev
    @evChDev 2 года назад

    nah, a lightning would chew this thing up

    • @jnj04
      @jnj04 2 года назад

      It said “Modern like lighting performance” clown

    • @4touchdowns1game29
      @4touchdowns1game29 2 года назад +2

      lol no it wouldn't. The new lightning is estimated 4.5 0-60. This thing isn't even pushing the limits. These ecoboost engines haul ass. My 2.3 on my channel with fbo, plugs, e30 and a tune is faster than a gt.

  • @LeviRice
    @LeviRice 2 года назад +1

    I thought it was gonna be a v8 with a 2.7 supercharger lol

  • @Drake5153
    @Drake5153 4 года назад +3

    The MAIN thing that makes a lightning a lightning is whats missing from this truck. Remember, your shooting for lightning, not Syclone. I wish Ford would take a look back at a recent movie that included them, maybe they'd realize yet again that compromise isn't always the best thing.. nor is forgetting what a name means. I wish I could say I'd be interested in buying my fourth ford, but not only are almost ALL of your vehicles priced out of reach for the average consumer without going cheque to cheque, but i have yet to find something interesting and fun that you still make.. well, the Bronco was until I realized it starts at $40,000+ CAD lol get out, I bought a 2018 "lightning" with a REAL V8 for two grand less and now I have to pay extra for a "glorified" wrangler lol.

    • @BeanoNoir
      @BeanoNoir 3 года назад +2

      Are you aware that this truck he's showing stock is as fast as a 2004 lightning, as in without any of the upgrades? I'm all for V8s, but if you actually drive them, this 2.7L kicks pretty much everything but the 3.5 High outputs booty. The 5.0 isn't even close. (That, and the Gen 2 Coyotes aren't built anywhere near as heavily as this engine. They are peaky downgraded track motors for a Mustang that they just wanted to make less expensive through volume production. Not the best, not the worst truck motors) The THING that made the lightning the lightning was that it was light, with a powerful engine. At the time, the best way to do that was with a modified Modular V8. Nowadays, you can get a cheap work truck that's just as quick as it was.

    • @Drake5153
      @Drake5153 3 года назад

      @@BeanoNoir the 2.7 doesn't have the legs, nor the room for power like the 5.0 does, and the 2018+ f150's come with the Gen 3 coyote, same as the mustang just different intake cam, LOTS of potential. No, one of the main things that ruin this truck is the steering ratio and lack of an awd transfer case , but adding a 2.7 doesn't help lol. Why not get an Explorer ST? You'd get FAR more for the money and the same tow rating, and if you really need a bed then get a real truck.

    • @birdsgarage3305
      @birdsgarage3305 3 года назад +3

      @@Drake5153 A real truck? Have you driven an F150 with the 2.7? It has more torque in the RPM range that a "real truck" uses than a 5.0. BuT mUh v8!

    • @rdsii64
      @rdsii64 2 года назад +1

      @@BeanoNoir Actually this little blue truck is faster than an actual lightning. It weighs less and makes 452 hp compared to the lightnings 380.

  • @royrichardson9164
    @royrichardson9164 4 года назад +1

    I've seen that truck at the dealer....

    • @cljerjr31
      @cljerjr31 4 года назад

      could you send the link?

    • @royrichardson9164
      @royrichardson9164 4 года назад +1

      @@cljerjr31 its at Capital Ford of RockyMount in NC. They also had 2 rcsb supercharged coyote f150s there.

    • @tylerlumleyy4166
      @tylerlumleyy4166 3 года назад +1

      I wouldn’t go with the ford dealership in rocky mount.. I just made that mistake a few months ago. Lied to me and made me think my truck was a 3.5 when it was a 2.7 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @royrichardson9164
      @royrichardson9164 3 года назад +1

      @@tylerlumleyy4166 wow!! You didn't check the vin?

    • @tylerlumleyy4166
      @tylerlumleyy4166 3 года назад +1

      roy richardson no unfortunately I didn’t.. that was one of many lies they told me. I still love my 2.7 tho

  • @347mav3
    @347mav3 2 года назад

    Their faster and quicker than a Lightning.

  • @caseyclark7667
    @caseyclark7667 Год назад

    Warped dash

  • @Drunken_Hamster
    @Drunken_Hamster 2 года назад +2

    No way in heck a full-sized truck actually gets 30MPG without some serious eco mods and/or a hybrid system. I'd believe 26, tops. Especially since it makes MORE power, now.

    • @09roadraider40
      @09roadraider40 2 года назад +1

      I get 30 highway MPG in my all stock all original 2.7 2wd regular cab long bed 323 gears work truck 60,000 mi

    • @rdsii64
      @rdsii64 2 года назад

      @@09roadraider40 In my 2018 stx 2.7L crewcab 4x4 with the 5.5 foot bed I get 29.5 mpg at 56 mph. At 72 I get 23.5. This is with 355 gears.

    • @rdsii64
      @rdsii64 2 года назад

      At 56 mph I average 29.5.
      At 65 mph I average 25.
      At 72 mph. I average 23.5.
      In the city I average 19 and have gotten as good as 21
      Thats with a 2018 STX supercrew 4x4 with gears 355 gears.
      So it is possible.

    • @Drunken_Hamster
      @Drunken_Hamster 2 года назад

      @@rdsii64 My 09 Ranger 2.3 must be running like ass, then. I already did plugs, wires, and air filter. It has 3.73's and a 0.81 5th gear, which when combined with 235/70R16 tires turns 2750 RPM at 75. I do mostly city driving and get between 17.5 and 19.5 MPG, but hearing about all this is really bothering me, because I BOUGHT this thing due to its good gas mileage...

    • @rdsii64
      @rdsii64 2 года назад

      @@Drunken_Hamster That isn't bad mileage for 2009 technology. Remember your ranger doesn't have a 10 speed transmission in with 3 overdrive gears. At 65 I'm barely turning 1500 RPMS. Don't forget these new 10 speeds are multimode transmissions.(Normal, sport, eco, snow/sand, rock-crawl. mud ruts, wet.) These modes actually work, they aren't BS marketing fluff. If my truck is at 2750 RPMs in 10th gear you would be reading about me on the evening news.

  • @jorgegarrido6076
    @jorgegarrido6076 3 года назад +2

    i guess im lucky i got my 2018 2.7tt for 22k with only 16k miles lol

  • @michoacanom4320
    @michoacanom4320 3 года назад

    He said minimum upgrades dude thats all the upgrades you can do to the engine turbos,downpipe,cai,and tunning your v6 its maxed out

    • @juanasanchez4961
      @juanasanchez4961 3 года назад +3

      You need to do some research dude.

    • @michoacanom4320
      @michoacanom4320 3 года назад

      @@juanasanchez4961 i know one thing my coyote with 8k will smoke any EcoBoost with upgrades with a seal engine facts🤷‍♂️🤭🤭😁😁

    • @Darylrb1983
      @Darylrb1983 3 года назад +1

      That's not maxed out at all.

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад

      You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about 🤣🤣

    • @ZACH_95_
      @ZACH_95_ 3 года назад +2

      @@michoacanom4320 you’re v8 will not outdo the new 2021 3.5 ecoboost. Lmao 😂

  • @crdwzy4688
    @crdwzy4688 3 года назад

    Lost me at, 2.7