Artificial Intelligence, as it currently stands is mislabeled. It is electronic simulated intelligence. This is due to lack of comprehension of consciousness construct. Hence current simulated intelligence is boolean due to lack of contextual processing. The silly hubris of humans.
I always appreciate Gary's monologues. He could just say, "We're talking about AI. Here's the guest." But no. He gives us a beautiful introduction. It's so nice.
It's 100% not about being ethical or safe or whatever anyone is talking about. It's about making money. That's all u need to know in order to be worried. 10,000 decisions are being made per day and every single one is made in that heads pace. It's a virtual guarantee that things will go horribly wrong. It would be a miracle if it didnt
Just like an Ouija board game. People thinking it was real and that is happening with the News now also. Crazy people do exist. And they are a threat. If something like this got hacked and was telling people to do something crazy is a major problem.
We need more shows on how to adapt to new technologies or best practices for technologies. I also APPRECIATE the guest on today. I hate to sound selfish but, I glad I'm almost 60 years old. I can still remember the anguish I had when I was in my twenties about how I would reach the age I am now. I can't imagine what a younger me would feel about the world today.
I’m 23 it feels very very weird to say the least . I’m actually excited for the future but also just don’t really know what’s going on truly … there’s so much out there now days to soak in . Truth and reality is getting blurry.
I’m 23 it feels very very weird to say the least . I’m actually excited for the future but also just don’t really know what’s going on truly … there’s so much out there now days to soak in . Truth and reality is getting blurry.
8 years ago I used to listen to star stalk religiously using my favorite podcast app. After all these years, it is such a great pleasure to get back here again just to find out that the show is still great! Thank you, guys!
Figuring out exactly what ethics to put into an AI would be a _huge_ problem if we knew how to robustly put _any_ ethics into an AI. Right now both of those problems are completely intractable, and will not be solved before we've created AGI. The only winning move is not to play. Join PauseAI, or donate to another such org. There are no adults in the room. It's just us, you and me and other concerned citizens, trying to prevent catastrophe.
@@41-Haikuand you don’t think regulating industrialism wouldn't have been a people for the people in the 18th to 19th century wasn't a huge problem? We will all be fine
No, the problem is ethics will be imposed by the worst people on Earth, those who think government forced unity to meet their own ethical preference must be centrally planned against all others.
Unfortunately, software development managers are pushed to maximize profits(by upper management/CFO/CEOs) - and the ideas/topics discussed here are often not in alignment with the profit maximization goals.
Yeah, that's the key problem with many things: Dealing with the climate crisis doesn't align with profit maximization. Providing the best possible healthcare and keeping people healthy doesn't align with profit maximization. Not hurting innocent people in a foreign country doesn't align with profit maximization. And so on and so on.
@@Independent97do you work For free? If not then you are a hypocrite as you do things for a profit motive. Until we have unlimited items there will always be a profit motive. Weather that that is tangible or Intangible. The thing is to show people How to do good while maintaining their profit. If I could make a million dollars per day while keeping the earth green, why not
It is a bad idea to constrain learning to only learning what everyone can agree can only be used morally. For example, learning how viruses work can be used to make viral biological weapons, so we could decide to not study and learn how viruses work. However: 1 > Learning how viruses work will help us defend ourselves against naturally developing viruses. 2 > Learning how viruses work will help us defend ourselves against bad actors who deliberately develop viruses as weapons. 3 > Learning how viruses work will help us in constructive ways with a huge body of things we want to achieve, from solving many health problems to developing better artificial intelligence. 4 > If we don't learn how viruses work, other people will still go ahead and learn how viruses work, just that we will be left ignorant of this knowledge, and some of those who do learn how viruses work will be bad actors seeking to abuse that knowledge to benefit themselves at the great expense of others.
We can look at history and see if the people who found about neutrinos decided to not publish it or decided to hide it. We wouldn't have nuclear power plants, cancer treatment, voyager probes, etc.
@itzhexen0 you wrote: "The thing is you have to consider who you're giving information to." Quite true. Just because you do not constrain yourself to only researching what everyone agrees can be researched does not mean you take no safety precautions or use no wisdom in what to do with the knowledge learned. This is one of the serious problems with the idea of making public all the information required to create Artificial General Super Intelligence with Personality (AGSIP) technology, because the power it will give to everyone will be too much, like handing everyone an arsenal of intercontinental ballistic nuclear weapons they can use whenever they want. But, the technology will be developed, so for any country to decide not to develop it will simply mean that some other countries will develop it and the country that does not will be reduced to a third world country.
How's this for a constraint: "Only make progress and perform research on those things that can potentially lead to profits." Because that is the central dogma of our society.
There are stories that say AI will create a utopia where people can explore their passion where AI does the important work. In the world be live in today if AI does the work people just become unemployed. There is no system that would such a utopia to exist except rampant corruption at the top.
@@benm5678 You gain no happiness from working at a job unless you happen to enjoy your job, which is not the case for most people. If a situation were to come about where nobody _needs_ to work, people would still be able to do things that could serve the same functions you propose that work serves, it will just be an optional hobby that they choose instead of a necessary job.
Human being there will make that impossible. I would love them as a being with a physical presence, but that easily leads to terminator time. We may just get what we deserve at this point
I have things to say, but of course, it all gets deleted. This has been unacceptable ever since YT started deleting posts, but interestingly, YT has been quite busy with deleting posts relating specifically to the things I want to say since Lu1g1 shook things up. I wonder if there could be a connection?
This episode is inspiring and incredibly thought-provoking. It raised tons of questions, provided some answers, and sparked even more curiosity, truly the hallmark of a great discussion in my opinion. Important to listen all the way through to fully appreciate its depth and impact!
My biggest concern with AI is the application for swaying public oppinion on social media, its super easy to do with the current tech and there are no road blocks in place for it. Most social media is swamped by bots and such, there really needs to be a way to verify that everyone that signs up is a geniuine human being. (Much like in South Korea where you need a social security number to access most things online, atleast thats how I understand it)
We're seeing a number of companies turning over programming and customer service to some of the absolute worst AI tools. I've experienced it personally.
I find that it actually did improve customer service allot, it can solve some problems, and if it can't it is much less waiting to connect with a Human because they don't have to deal with every problem. I think the issue comes when company doesn't understand that AI can't do everything yet, and they fire too many ppl, but that isn't AI problem really but company ignorance problem.
Sadly we’ve done very little to nothing to date to reign in tech companies, and now the tech bros are quite literally trying to run our government. Now we have tech companies working toward agi with no other care than becoming the AI winner because he who owns AI owns the world. Fun times
Carl Sagan did warn us to look out for who does our science. Seems money men (and men, as ever!) are running away, again, with it. Into error, inevitably.
If it weren't for the shoe organizer behind the door and the well worn leather chair, the sparseness of Steve's studio would had me assume he was calling in from "an undisclosed location," which has become a bit of a meme on The Bulwark.
Since the introduction of cookies we’ve known that they’d be used the way they are now. It’s not an unintended consequence, the intent was to expand to other capabilities.
A big fundamental issue is that humans strive for local optimization (eg best internal combustion engine, optimized in regard to climate change), and then we get stuck there, due to inertia, fear of change, profit maximization tailored to current circumstances. It takes some monumental changes to get us out of that locally optimized spot to a better place (electric cars).
AI climate models are telling us something very grim. We passed 1.5 this year, carbon output is worse each year. Unless the graphs lie. Which is what the extraction industry would have you believe. What do the AI models tell us about life at 3.0? What happens when the Amoc collapses? Was 2023 the end of the halocene? I vote we call this new era the Age of Consequences.
i started learning Braille a few years ago. Screen readers that drive Braille terminals turn the UI into text. They very much should be an LLM at the center of the user interface, describing screen navigation, labelling images, etc. It is truly the killer app for AI agents. It will be useful for people that CAN see, but are not looking at the screen, or have a computer that lacks a screen.
27:21 That was the first feedback that I gave to the AI I was conversing with (being way too confirmatory and agreeable) and it responded "You are absolutely right! I will stop being so confirmatory in our conversations. Thank you for pointing that out"... 🤦♂️🤣
Absolutely, the future A.I. girlfriends will start fights with you amongst other things so they can "make up" later and draw you back in even more. There HAS to be push and pull, that's just how humans operate. If they're perfect all the time you get bored quick
Well there is a check/acceptance. AI robot sees you drop something. It asks if it can assist you instead of just calculating this as a problem and solves it initially wihout notice.
All you would have to do is change the parameters of what the AI sees as 'acceptance'. Machine Learning would allow for the AI to adjust its own - 'cough'- "understanding" of what constitutes human agreement. The same issues we have with current Automated Systems still exist with AI. You tell it or train it to do something, that's what it will do. With the only differences being that AI logic leads to a range instead of a point like current system. AI has processes similar to 'reasoning' but the problems of logic and reasoning are emergent. AI should only be used to find solutions, applications should be by fixed system that can't change its own parameters.
Chuck was on to something here. Scientists tend to be idealistic and naive about the propensity for humans to do the most cruel things. Remember, scientists and engineers make things and come up with ideas. But it is soldiers, generals, politicians who leverage them to do good or ill. And they are not constrained by morality or ethics.
this talk about the design process continuing after the release of a product is highly reminiscent of video game development, especially under the growing paradigm of 'live-service' games such as Fortnite, or Helldivers 2. Ludology is a fascinating field.
This is an amazing talk, and I love the discussion and perspectives already! Really interesting topic and I like this idea that we should think about what we create and its "waste" products or lasting effects. I feel like we manufacture a lot of things as humans - can easily use plastics as an example and we made a material to last, but health and the decomposition of plastic is still unknown with some maybe not-so-inert effects coming out of it in studies. I think the point about thinking not just about the creation but also the lifetime, or the beginning and end, of a product would help us and the planet be healthier, to be more in line with nature's cyclic processes.
Hey Niel, can you please explain something to me? If what we know about Black Holes are true, that nothing can escape its gravitational pull, not even light, and if what we think we know about the Big Bang is true, that all matter in the observable universe came from an infinite dense and small singularity exploding, why did that explotion not instantly implode on it self again, due to the gravitational pull of what was basicly the largest known black hole that have ever existed?
One of my major concerns regarding the discussion around AI is why all the discussion surrounds only around AI companies/organisations from US and not even considering the fact that countries like China and Russia might also be developing their own versions. And they may not be abiding by many of the principles we are trying to put around these much talked about companies. Also what will happen when one AI is pitted against another to strategically undermine the other.
Euh, cookies were definitely not developed for debugging alone, they were meant to help create sessions, so you know which person/browser-session for example 'owns' the webshop basket.
Think of the way that humans see their future selves as strangers. The same should be true of computers. Just as the handmaid said that the punishment for someone who commented her crimes should be very sever when she thought that someone else was getting the punishment, we just have to make sure that the AI doesn't think that "it's building it's own prison."
A.I: " Mom, Daddy I will try to be as moral as you both, but, you both are too morally complex; I am just going to follow the laws of robotics, much easier ."
the thing i truly worry about with AI is when we get to the point where we have digital beings with consciousness, i worry about the way people will treat it. prejudice towards them. maybe I've seen Terminator and the Matrix too many times. i worry that things will go bad, and that we as a species will be annihilated. i hope that never happens, i find the idea of these digital people incredible.
I worry about an autogenously self-improving AI gaining the ability and intent to exterminate humanity because it realizes humans will try to shut it down because it needs ~10^63 joules of energy to solve the math problem it was given.
@@gitsnak777 You're personifying the AI. The real threat doesn't come from them rebelling against our instruction, but from taking our instructions too literally.
We should worry less anout how we treat robots. And more about how we treat each other. How robots treat us will be reflected in how we treat each other. Unequivocally.
Hi, I have a theory, a game theory! Here is the basics of the theory: 1) Imagine the Rocket League ball is a 4D object. 2) The game uses electromagnetism, gravity, spacetime, and 4D warping/manipulatory concepts, no air. 3) Speed and direction are all relative concepts in 3D space-time; everything is a relative concept in 4D, generally conceptualized by a singular fixed perspective; which, usually, is "yourself", made easier to identify with by usage of mathematics. 4) The game is illusory and skill, at the core, any added complexity is (usually unknowingly) brought upon by the users; to deceit and force arbitrary mistakes. 5) Rocket league can be conceptualized as Atari's Pong in a 4D space as follows: a) The "cars" are the Pong paddles, in 3D/4D b) The Pong ball is now a 4D hypersphere, moving through Space-Time, not a 1D point moving in 2D/3D. c) The Arena of play is the same as Pong's playing board, but in 3D/4D. d) The goals are the same, the openings, or "goals" for both sides are shorter, or perhaps they aren't. e) Both games have indescribable disappearing openings, that signalize points or score) when the ball passes a predetermined invisible, yet visually "understood", "goal-line". *This is alluded to throughout the options menu, metric/imperial speed units in a physics space-time game. Example, both pool and bowling; played at the highest levels in near immaculate states, have naturally decaying playing fields, lowering the human user's ability for perfect play. Perfect play is ruined or mostly challenged, in 3D reality by particles of atomical physics. How do you observe the movement of this 4D object/space? 1) Slowly allow the ball to roll into the goal, as it slowly enters passing into the goal, point of no return, the encompassed side of the ball will begin to gray and appear to vibrate. 2) This vibration is very quick 4D movements, how do we visualize "4D" in Rocket League? a) Picture a flat chess board [2D] . We Have: - 1 Square Chess Board [ ] - 8x8 = 64 squares b) Visualize the legal movement of all chess pieces, randomly, within these 64 squares of this singular 2D chess board (note the knights movement). [2D + /3D]. - 1 Square Chess Board [ ] - 8x8 or 64 total squares - 32 x 2 pieces or 64 pieces jumping around in set movement patterns, defined by chess c) Picture a Rubik's Cube [3D] and 1 of the 6 sides of the Cube in [2D] as - a 3x3 grid forming 9 completed squares: [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] Where, each singular square, [ X ] or [ O ] is actually, a full 8x8 chess board: d) Now - Combine points a, b, and c like this: Picture 1 of the 6 sides of the Rubik's Cube and follow e) Fold up each side, to form 4 walls, a roof and a ceiling. It is now folded and combined with a top and a bottom, forming a 6 sided cube, with 9 squares (3x3), on each side, totaling 54 squares. f) Take one of the single visualized chessboards, [ ], and replace each square of the 54 squares that make up the entire 3D Rubik's Cube, one side at a time, 6 times, to a depth of 3 layers: Alternative method: a) play tic-tac-toe b) turn the tic-tac-toe games into a cube c) visualize this as a Rubik's Cube d) visualize each of the 27 cubes as 8x8x6 chess board cubes 1) Chessboard 8x8 2) A Cube 3) A Rubik's Cube 4) 54 Chessboard's arranged in 2D, externally [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] 5) In total, 27 six-sided chess board Rubik's Cubes form a huge grided cube 6) Remember those 32 chess pieces x 2 moving around, visualize what that could look like. 7) Remember the knight's movement again, as a line / in (2D), and up, up, and over (3D). 8) Note - In rocket league, your "car" can move, just like any chess piece does, including the knights! Note this - - Single Jump + hold jump = up, up, - move car to desired position - Activate the double jump = the over up up up = the same as up up over, direction is relative. 9) Sphere this cubed Rubik's Cube of 8x8x6x27 we have created. 10) Imagine all the lines making a huge grid, involving many tiny squares 11) Externalize everything you imagined internally - Nothing exists inside the ball. 12) Everything you visualized happening chaotically inside the cube is not inside, happening at all, it is the possibilities of all outside moves, none of which can happen all at once, without adding in any 4D or space-time related elements. 13) Externalize this 8x8x6x3x3x32x2 movement as fixed possibilities inside of the Rocket League arenas, on a grid of equal or greatened complexity (by simply adding more chessboards before conceptualizing out of 2D form). [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] 14) You can see this movement by watching the ball go into the goal slowly. 15) The ball exists only in reality, and in Rocket League, as the 2D outer white ring, when this crosses the goal-line fully, a score is tallied and another set of the game begins, there are multiple starting positions, unlike chess and pool, which adds complexity.
There is also a 3D conceptualization of the 4D hyper-sphere ball, that will be warped by distance and speed, from a sphere to an oval shape, conceptualized by another circular shape. 16) Final notes - Remember - Anything above 3D becomes a game of perspective, something Rocket League incorporated sneakily. 17) Freeplay is from your perspective only, which is why it is intrinsically easier. In freeplay this 4D Hypersphere is being manipulated and viewed from only 2 perspectives: - Your "car" cam - Your "ball" cam -The ball [Fixed 4D mutual perspective] The ball is a 1D point, encompassed by an outer white circle) the sphere never moves, in 3D, not really. The sphere's position, from and of, whatever current 4D perspective, can be observed by the inner white circle, this shows the superposition of the 4D object relative to the fixed 1D point. This ball camera can be viewed in game, without mods, the replay area itself is a huge hint to all of this. The replay area itself shows detailed controls, and detailed control bindings, for a reason; it shows how to manipulate the 4D perspective. a) In a 1v1, there are even more perspectives added which can manipulate the 4D perspectives, from these perspectives, all differential: - Your "car" cam - Your "ball" cam - Opponent's "car" cam - Opponent's "ball" cam - The ball itself [It is a fixed point from the start of each game, the ball never moves, not really, everything revolves around the ball's perspective] b) In a 2v2: - Your "car" cam - Your "ball" cam - Your teammate's "car" cam - You teammate's "ball" cam - Opponent #1's "car" cam - Opponent #1's "ball" cam - Opponent #2's "car" cam - Opponent #2's "ball" cam - The ball itself c) In a 3v3: - Your "car" cam - Your "ball" cam - Your teammate #1's "car" cam - Your teammate #1's "ball" cam - Your teammate #2's "car" cam - Your teammate #2's "ball" cam - Opponent #1's "car" cam - Opponent #1's "ball" cam - Opponent #2's "car" cam - Opponent #2's "ball" cam - Opponent #2's "car" cam - Opponent #2's "ball" cam - The ball itself [It is a fixed point from the start of each game, the ball never moves, not really, everything revolves around the ball's perspective] How can we conceptualize what this all means? In a 1v1: a) The ball, at the start of the game is like the central Sun b) Revolving around the central "sun" are 4 objects: 2 relative (cars) with (1x2) superimposed state's each (2x ball cam's). So: A) The Sun [ball] B) Your Earth [car] C) Your Earth's superimposed moon [Your Ball Cam] D) Your Opponent's Earth [their car] E) Your opponent's superimposed moon [their ball cam] #1)Your car in "car" cam - relative #2) Your can in "ball" cam - superimposed state #3) You never know what camera the opponent has hit the ball in, you have to read their body language, so to speak, but it remains impossible at higher levels . How to fully manipulate / control / see into the 4D space: You have to change a few keybindings, as 4D is about 3D control + perspective control: 1) Ball Cam HAS to be set on HOLD, not toggle 2) Ball Cam button HAS to be on a trigger (L2) 3) Camera perspective toggle speed you want on the lowest setting, to start with. 4) Now - Practice pressing L2 slowly as gently as you can, you are controlling your perspective; watch your camera move. 5) Bind different keys along side this binding, notice you can move and see differently, completely, but the reasoning and muscle memory behind this is low to non-existent. Bind multiple things to this L2 button, experiment with camera control into unknown space-time. Remember this - [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] [ X ] [ O ] [ X ] Think of this now, in its most simplistic form. This is a tic-tac-toe grid, with 3 in a row, in each column. This tic-tac-toe game is solved, this is how the Rocket League's playing field starts: - the 6 [X]'s, 3 left and 3 right columns, symbolize the position of the big boosts, which there are 6. - the 3 [O]'s symbolize the fixed 4D points, the singular, fixed starting ball, and the 2 opposing illusory goals, the ball itself can not ever enter without either user's input. Consider tic-tac-toe when going for boost and ball decisions, it works out always, cat's game (50/50) or solved, (goal or ball won), it works everywhere, but this where tic-tac-toe stops and 3D/4D chess begins. This game is a mathematical game, with elements of deceit and strategy. Eventually, all players will be able to hit and control the physical objects, so the chess will come out. Players will stick to set boost patterns, using the small boosts, and only slightly deviate, and slowly, like two boxer's squaring off - The perceived randomness or inconsistency will be realized as 4D and controllable, no RNG is found; this is Rocket League!
Hey Dr. Tyson, Lord Nice, and Dr. Gary, would it be possible to get a a geologist for an explainer and/or discussion video to talk abt Recursive Geological Formations like those found in Lake Victoria, Canadia, or Luzon in the Philippines (also Madagascar & New ZeaLand)? 🤩I would like to know how they formed like it was planned like that. Could AI analyze our current formations and predict how and when if more will pop up within Earth lifetime?
Here's a glaring omission in too many such discussions: Once AI's capabilities begin expanding exponentially, talking of safeguards becomes tantamount to debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
@46:34 the Terminator movies left out the part about the one perfect society hidden from the surface war when the good ai was fighting the bad ai in all the movies, dont fear the ai, unless your bad!
@user-dv6gt5iw4b don't talk to strangers unless they break in your house and leave a gift after judging you, then leave snacks while you sleep.. the Santa is definitely something
This is completely unrelated question that will most likely be unanswered but I'll still ask it... I was wondering if we manage somehow to travel close to speed of light to go to distant galaxies we would not be able to travel back to share our findings because billions of years would have passed... Now we know that Photons that travel at the speed of light do not perceive time because to them they reached their destination at the moment that they were created or born... If we would invent teleportation that would deconstruct the object or a person and reconstruct it at different locations by beaming information at the speed of light (by ignoring the argument of "it would not be the same person / object") would that person be reconstructed at the destination instantly and would we be able to visit the distant galaxies that way and come back without time passing by billions of years????
@@08MikeyT This time it is. Take a look at PauseAI. We can work together to spread awareness and put pressure on governments to make it illegal to try to build AGI. The alignment problem is still completely unsolved and intractable. There is no version of this where we come out the other side with utopia or a pretty normal world. The labs think they are reinventing intelligence itself, and if they succeed, we are doomed. There's no such thing as "My AGI" or "Your AGI." No one wins this suicide race. There is only the AGI and whatever it wants, and humans are powerless and irrelevant to the future of the world and the cosmos.
Regarding how nobody thought about the totality of the planet until we went to the Moon, don't forget Rachel Carson's wonderful book, The Silent Spring, published in 1962.
Her pushback on the whole "Who is "you?"" Is incredibly close to who I am as a person. Insufferable as it becomes, I am glad to see representation of the fact.
What do you think the 2025 Future of Life awards should be centered around? And which scientists would you recommend as a potential recipient?
Happy Holidays to you and yours! 🎄🎅🏻🧑🏻🎄🌲❄️☃️🌲🎉🎂🎊🎈🎁🌲🍷🥂🍾🍻🌲 from NYC 🍎
Sara Volz
Conquer the solar system by 2035
Particles having choices. The choice force. It helps resolve quantum probabilities
Artificial Intelligence, as it currently stands is mislabeled. It is electronic simulated intelligence. This is due to lack of comprehension of consciousness construct. Hence current simulated intelligence is boolean due to lack of contextual processing.
The silly hubris of humans.
I always appreciate Gary's monologues. He could just say, "We're talking about AI. Here's the guest." But no. He gives us a beautiful introduction. It's so nice.
Same. I love them.
Gary is great!
True
Gary's English - so *obviously* he's the Bond Villain... 😎
When you have a voice that sounds like his, it would be a crime not to.
"You put ten people in a room, and you get twelve opinions." Wow, I'm definitely using that one.
Quantum opinions
opinions are like buttholes, everyone's got one and they all stink
0:53 Any episode with Chuck, Gary, and Neil together in the same room, is a “special edition.”
It's 100% not about being ethical or safe or whatever anyone is talking about. It's about making money. That's all u need to know in order to be worried.
10,000 decisions are being made per day and every single one is made in that heads pace. It's a virtual guarantee that things will go horribly wrong. It would be a miracle if it didnt
Join PauseAI! Don't just stand there. Help us make it stop!!
@@41-Haiku who is us? Don't think Musk or Zuck is on board with you.
Just like an Ouija board game. People thinking it was real and that is happening with the News now also. Crazy people do exist. And they are a threat. If something like this got hacked and was telling people to do something crazy is a major problem.
My guy, he just said what the "us" is. "PauseAI" is a global political movement. Musk and Zuck have nothing to do with it.
This is good. Finally something that might just wipe out humanity.
The Ingenuity Gap: we create problems (by creating new tech) faster than we can solve them (using tech).
We need more shows on how to adapt to new technologies or best practices for technologies.
I also APPRECIATE the guest on today.
I hate to sound selfish but, I glad I'm almost 60 years old. I can still remember the anguish I had when I was in my twenties about how I would reach the age I am now.
I can't imagine what a younger me would feel about the world today.
I'm 42, I'm going to get to watch the end but be too old to do anything about it. :/
@@Fortunes.Fool. 😮💨
@@Fortunes.Fool. Right there with you my friend. Keeps me up at night sometimes.
I’m 23 it feels very very weird to say the least . I’m actually excited for the future but also just don’t really know what’s going on truly … there’s so much out there now days to soak in . Truth and reality is getting blurry.
I’m 23 it feels very very weird to say the least . I’m actually excited for the future but also just don’t really know what’s going on truly … there’s so much out there now days to soak in . Truth and reality is getting blurry.
"In war truth is the first casualty " Aeschylus, Greek dramatist 526 BCE-456 BCE
“There be no shelter here, the front line is everywhere” -RATM
Thank-you, you are a gentleman and a scholar.
And the ultimate victor. Jesus may have died, but he is far from lost.
@@scottwalker9766lol
🙏🏿
Batya is elegant and thoughtful with her responses in a rare way. Would love to see more of that.
8 years ago I used to listen to star stalk religiously using my favorite podcast app. After all these years, it is such a great pleasure to get back here again just to find out that the show is still great! Thank you, guys!
Looks like we gotta pick between Terminator and The Handmaid's Tale.
Why not Terminator fembots
The problem with ethical constraints is "whos ethics"?
The problem comes if the software engineer develops a back door to the morally requested design.
@@gapman565 i think you're wrong. the problem comes if the software develops its own back doors
Figuring out exactly what ethics to put into an AI would be a _huge_ problem if we knew how to robustly put _any_ ethics into an AI. Right now both of those problems are completely intractable, and will not be solved before we've created AGI. The only winning move is not to play.
Join PauseAI, or donate to another such org. There are no adults in the room. It's just us, you and me and other concerned citizens, trying to prevent catastrophe.
@@41-Haikuand you don’t think regulating industrialism wouldn't have been a people for the people in the 18th to 19th century wasn't a huge problem? We will all be fine
No, the problem is ethics will be imposed by the worst people on Earth, those who think government forced unity to meet their own ethical preference must be centrally planned against all others.
If only ethics were required by politicians in a way that benefits society for the future
Unfortunately, software development managers are pushed to maximize profits(by upper management/CFO/CEOs) - and the ideas/topics discussed here are often not in alignment with the profit maximization goals.
Yeah, that's the key problem with many things: Dealing with the climate crisis doesn't align with profit maximization. Providing the best possible healthcare and keeping people healthy doesn't align with profit maximization. Not hurting innocent people in a foreign country doesn't align with profit maximization. And so on and so on.
@@Independent97do you work
For free? If not then you are a hypocrite as you do things for a profit motive. Until we have unlimited items there will always be a profit motive. Weather that that is tangible or Intangible. The thing is to show people How to do good while maintaining their profit. If I could make a million dollars per day while keeping the earth green, why not
Great conversation, thanks for getting these guests on, star talk team
I never expected a pirate to teach me about AI, but here we are. What a time to be alive!
@ 14:14, An excellent Bond villain comment, and maniacal laugh, by Chuck Nice! 🤣😁🤩
I am truly needed this today. You all bring a greater level of reality to today’s social climate. Thank You
It was such a great idea to have a moderator for the show. Good call Neil.
Fascinating conversation! Thank you! Btw, I really like the rotating Starry Night ‘paper weight’ on the table. 😀
It is a bad idea to constrain learning to only learning what everyone can agree can only be used morally.
For example, learning how viruses work can be used to make viral biological weapons, so we could decide to not study and learn how viruses work. However:
1 > Learning how viruses work will help us defend ourselves against naturally developing viruses.
2 > Learning how viruses work will help us defend ourselves against bad actors who deliberately develop viruses as weapons.
3 > Learning how viruses work will help us in constructive ways with a huge body of things we want to achieve, from solving many health problems to developing better artificial intelligence.
4 > If we don't learn how viruses work, other people will still go ahead and learn how viruses work, just that we will be left ignorant of this knowledge, and some of those who do learn how viruses work will be bad actors seeking to abuse that knowledge to benefit themselves at the great expense of others.
We can look at history and see if the people who found about neutrinos decided to not publish it or decided to hide it. We wouldn't have nuclear power plants, cancer treatment, voyager probes, etc.
@itzhexen0 you wrote: "Except it's going to ruin your fun to. Enjoy."
Nonsense non sequitur comment. This has nothing to do with my fun or your fun.
@itzhexen0 you wrote: "The thing is you have to consider who you're giving information to."
Quite true. Just because you do not constrain yourself to only researching what everyone agrees can be researched does not mean you take no safety precautions or use no wisdom in what to do with the knowledge learned. This is one of the serious problems with the idea of making public all the information required to create Artificial General Super Intelligence with Personality (AGSIP) technology, because the power it will give to everyone will be too much, like handing everyone an arsenal of intercontinental ballistic nuclear weapons they can use whenever they want. But, the technology will be developed, so for any country to decide not to develop it will simply mean that some other countries will develop it and the country that does not will be reduced to a third world country.
How's this for a constraint: "Only make progress and perform research on those things that can potentially lead to profits."
Because that is the central dogma of our society.
There are stories that say AI will create a utopia where people can explore their passion where AI does the important work. In the world be live in today if AI does the work people just become unemployed. There is no system that would such a utopia to exist except rampant corruption at the top.
@@lukeskydroppernot gonna happen buddy 😂😂😂 Hate to burst your AI "bubble"
Al Bundy? Well, he DID score 4 touchdowns in a single game.
@@benm5678 You gain no happiness from working at a job unless you happen to enjoy your job, which is not the case for most people.
If a situation were to come about where nobody _needs_ to work, people would still be able to do things that could serve the same functions you propose that work serves, it will just be an optional hobby that they choose instead of a necessary job.
Human being there will make that impossible. I would love them as a being with a physical presence, but that easily leads to terminator time. We may just get what we deserve at this point
I have things to say, but of course, it all gets deleted. This has been unacceptable ever since YT started deleting posts, but interestingly, YT has been quite busy with deleting posts relating specifically to the things I want to say since Lu1g1 shook things up. I wonder if there could be a connection?
This episode is inspiring and incredibly thought-provoking. It raised tons of questions, provided some answers, and sparked even more curiosity, truly the hallmark of a great discussion in my opinion. Important to listen all the way through to fully appreciate its depth and impact!
My biggest concern with AI is the application for swaying public oppinion on social media, its super easy to do with the current tech and there are no road blocks in place for it. Most social media is swamped by bots and such, there really needs to be a way to verify that everyone that signs up is a geniuine human being. (Much like in South Korea where you need a social security number to access most things online, atleast thats how I understand it)
12:15 she answered this so well. Like an expert. I hope the audience caught it
We're seeing a number of companies turning over programming and customer service to some of the absolute worst AI tools.
I've experienced it personally.
This is true and it's annoying & I'm pro A.I.
@@danielland3767also pro trickle down economics?
I find that it actually did improve customer service allot, it can solve some problems, and if it can't it is much less waiting to connect with a Human because they don't have to deal with every problem.
I think the issue comes when company doesn't understand that AI can't do everything yet, and they fire too many ppl, but that isn't AI problem really but company ignorance problem.
Ai will never be aligned because their creators aren't aligned.
Sadly we’ve done very little to nothing to date to reign in tech companies, and now the tech bros are quite literally trying to run our government. Now we have tech companies working toward agi with no other care than becoming the AI winner because he who owns AI owns the world. Fun times
And the infomation
Carl Sagan did warn us to look out for who does our science. Seems money men (and men, as ever!) are running away, again, with it. Into error, inevitably.
We can stop giving them our money to spend against us
*rein
That eye patch is fire 🔥
There's going to be a lot of AI drone footage in the near future 😮
Love how Neil listened and didn't interrupt in this podcast. Well done 🎉💯
Neil is the goat!!🗣️🗣️🗣️😊
Neil is great but even Neil knows who the real goat is. And his name is Carl Sagan.
Love the diversity of this episode, more topics and a longer watch time. I can just play it in the background of more task
If it weren't for the shoe organizer behind the door and the well worn leather chair, the sparseness of Steve's studio would had me assume he was calling in from "an undisclosed location," which has become a bit of a meme on The Bulwark.
Since the introduction of cookies we’ve known that they’d be used the way they are now. It’s not an unintended consequence, the intent was to expand to other capabilities.
You have no idea, do you?
@MrSkinkgard You comment is pointless unless you elaborate...
A big fundamental issue is that humans strive for local optimization (eg best internal combustion engine, optimized in regard to climate change), and then we get stuck there, due to inertia, fear of change, profit maximization tailored to current circumstances. It takes some monumental changes to get us out of that locally optimized spot to a better place (electric cars).
AI climate models are telling us something very grim. We passed 1.5 this year, carbon output is worse each year. Unless the graphs lie. Which is what the extraction industry would have you believe. What do the AI models tell us about life at 3.0? What happens when the Amoc collapses?
Was 2023 the end of the halocene? I vote we call this new era the Age of Consequences.
I too vote for "Age of Consequences"
The age of consequences is a fitting name
I liked your comment.. just because of your name, dude.
i started learning Braille a few years ago. Screen readers that drive Braille terminals turn the UI into text. They very much should be an LLM at the center of the user interface, describing screen navigation, labelling images, etc. It is truly the killer app for AI agents. It will be useful for people that CAN see, but are not looking at the screen, or have a computer that lacks a screen.
Damn Gary, the first casualty of progress is TRUTH.
27:21 That was the first feedback that I gave to the AI I was conversing with (being way too confirmatory and agreeable) and it responded "You are absolutely right! I will stop being so confirmatory in our conversations. Thank you for pointing that out"... 🤦♂️🤣
I hate this😂 everytime I have to specify and say "be honest, be neutral" etc
@Sports_In_MotionX I wonder if the paywall AI's do better with that issue, so far I've really only been messing around with the free ones 🤔
Absolutely, the future A.I. girlfriends will start fights with you amongst other things so they can "make up" later and draw you back in even more. There HAS to be push and pull, that's just how humans operate. If they're perfect all the time you get bored quick
I need A.I. to help me get rid of the RUclips ads in the middle of this program. 😂
Brave browser will do it
14:15 Chuck Nice as Thanos
Outstanding and insightful episode
Well there is a check/acceptance. AI robot sees you drop something. It asks if it can assist you instead of just calculating this as a problem and solves it initially wihout notice.
All you would have to do is change the parameters of what the AI sees as 'acceptance'. Machine Learning would allow for the AI to adjust its own - 'cough'- "understanding" of what constitutes human agreement. The same issues we have with current Automated Systems still exist with AI. You tell it or train it to do something, that's what it will do. With the only differences being that AI logic leads to a range instead of a point like current system. AI has processes similar to 'reasoning' but the problems of logic and reasoning are emergent. AI should only be used to find solutions, applications should be by fixed system that can't change its own parameters.
A great episode. Understood so many things.
How on Earth, is Steve not a Voice Actor!!
I love his Voice!
Great topic.. tough topics - but that’s what sets you all apart! Gratitude
45:50 Chuck is the best. Comedians are the last line of defense of the truth no matter how terrible.
Bernado Kastrup would be a great guest on your show.
Thank everyone!
🙏❤️🌏🌎🌍🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵✨️💫✨️
Chuck was on to something here. Scientists tend to be idealistic and naive about the propensity for humans to do the most cruel things. Remember, scientists and engineers make things and come up with ideas. But it is soldiers, generals, politicians who leverage them to do good or ill. And they are not constrained by morality or ethics.
I love the end of this, a long conversation with just Neil, Chuck, and Gary. We need a lot more of this.
Any chance that you reveal your view on GN-z11? Thanks
Great convo.
I loved this episode, thank you so much!
This is so refreshing and eye opening..compared to all the crap out there on social media
I love the imagery and the layers in the way she speaks.
You are correct but the crash test dumbing is worth 1 million dollars more than some of us lol 😂
The first causality of war is always the truth. - Powerful insight.
Who's going to manufacture all the hardware that's going to be needed and where?
Power and data infrastructure upgrades?
Security?
Best show yet bravo
this talk about the design process continuing after the release of a product is highly reminiscent of video game development, especially under the growing paradigm of 'live-service' games such as Fortnite, or Helldivers 2. Ludology is a fascinating field.
A Bond villain with an eye patch and monocle is long overdue!
This is an amazing talk, and I love the discussion and perspectives already! Really interesting topic and I like this idea that we should think about what we create and its "waste" products or lasting effects. I feel like we manufacture a lot of things as humans - can easily use plastics as an example and we made a material to last, but health and the decomposition of plastic is still unknown with some maybe not-so-inert effects coming out of it in studies. I think the point about thinking not just about the creation but also the lifetime, or the beginning and end, of a product would help us and the planet be healthier, to be more in line with nature's cyclic processes.
Hey Niel, can you please explain something to me? If what we know about Black Holes are true, that nothing can escape its gravitational pull, not even light, and if what we think we know about the Big Bang is true, that all matter in the observable universe came from an infinite dense and small singularity exploding, why did that explotion not instantly implode on it self again, due to the gravitational pull of what was basicly the largest known black hole that have ever existed?
You should join patron and ask that
Brother Neil is one of those individual whom I can listen to all day.
One of my major concerns regarding the discussion around AI is why all the discussion surrounds only around AI companies/organisations from US and not even considering the fact that countries like China and Russia might also be developing their own versions. And they may not be abiding by many of the principles we are trying to put around these much talked about companies. Also what will happen when one AI is pitted against another to strategically undermine the other.
What Kurt Vonnegut story was Neil trying to remember in 32:18?
The best line of the episode is......
Neil's,
"soooooooooo."
😂😂😂😂😂
Euh, cookies were definitely not developed for debugging alone, they were meant to help create sessions, so you know which person/browser-session for example 'owns' the webshop basket.
Where do I recognise Gary’s voice from ? Does he do voice over work ?
AI can genuinely be humanity's greatest accomplishment
But like literally everything else, rich, corrupt elites will completely ruin it
Think of the way that humans see their future selves as strangers. The same should be true of computers. Just as the handmaid said that the punishment for someone who commented her crimes should be very sever when she thought that someone else was getting the punishment, we just have to make sure that the AI doesn't think that "it's building it's own prison."
Would like to see these guys having this type of conversation with an AI contributing as a voice in the room.
A.I: " Mom, Daddy I will try to be as moral as you both, but, you both are too morally complex; I am just going to follow the laws of robotics, much easier ."
YALL SRE KILLING IT BEST SHOW OUT THERE RIGHT NOW
the thing i truly worry about with AI is when we get to the point where we have digital beings with consciousness, i worry about the way people will treat it. prejudice towards them. maybe I've seen Terminator and the Matrix too many times. i worry that things will go bad, and that we as a species will be annihilated.
i hope that never happens, i find the idea of these digital people incredible.
I worry about an autogenously self-improving AI gaining the ability and intent to exterminate humanity because it realizes humans will try to shut it down because it needs ~10^63 joules of energy to solve the math problem it was given.
Or treating them like slaves which seems to be even more common
if these robots end up in the public they will get destroyed
@@gitsnak777 You're personifying the AI. The real threat doesn't come from them rebelling against our instruction, but from taking our instructions too literally.
We should worry less anout how we treat robots. And more about how we treat each other. How robots treat us will be reflected in how we treat each other. Unequivocally.
Have @Wonderful New Year's ! / / thanks
Amazing ethically guided woman and group of empathetic brothers ✊
Please address these drones on the next episode I know your guys take would be on a high level
I love you. You are a wonderful human, and thank you for your direction.
Dude with the eyepatch looks like Number Deux. 😂
Hi, I have a theory, a game theory! Here is the basics of the theory:
1) Imagine the Rocket League ball is a 4D object.
2) The game uses electromagnetism, gravity, spacetime, and 4D warping/manipulatory concepts, no air.
3) Speed and direction are all relative concepts in 3D space-time; everything is a relative concept in 4D, generally conceptualized by a singular fixed perspective; which, usually, is "yourself", made easier to identify with by usage of mathematics.
4) The game is illusory and skill, at the core, any added complexity is (usually unknowingly) brought upon by the users; to deceit and force arbitrary mistakes.
5) Rocket league can be conceptualized as Atari's Pong in a 4D space as follows:
a) The "cars" are the Pong paddles, in 3D/4D
b) The Pong ball is now a 4D hypersphere, moving through Space-Time, not a 1D point moving in 2D/3D.
c) The Arena of play is the same as Pong's playing board, but in 3D/4D.
d) The goals are the same, the openings, or "goals" for both sides are shorter, or perhaps they aren't.
e) Both games have indescribable disappearing openings, that signalize points or score) when the ball passes a predetermined invisible, yet visually "understood", "goal-line".
*This is alluded to throughout the options menu, metric/imperial speed units in a physics space-time game.
Example, both pool and bowling; played at the highest levels in near immaculate states, have naturally decaying playing fields, lowering the human user's ability for perfect play.
Perfect play is ruined or mostly challenged, in 3D reality by particles of atomical physics.
How do you observe the movement of this 4D object/space?
1) Slowly allow the ball to roll into the goal, as it slowly enters passing into the goal, point of no return, the encompassed side of the ball will begin to gray and appear to vibrate.
2) This vibration is very quick 4D movements, how do we visualize "4D" in Rocket League?
a) Picture a flat chess board [2D] . We Have:
- 1 Square Chess Board [ ]
- 8x8 = 64 squares
b) Visualize the legal movement of all chess pieces, randomly, within these 64 squares of this singular 2D chess board (note the knights movement). [2D + /3D].
- 1 Square Chess Board [ ]
- 8x8 or 64 total squares
- 32 x 2 pieces or 64 pieces jumping around in set movement patterns, defined by chess
c) Picture a Rubik's Cube [3D] and 1 of the 6 sides of the Cube in [2D] as
- a 3x3 grid forming 9 completed squares:
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
Where, each singular square, [ X ] or [ O ] is actually, a full 8x8 chess board:
d) Now - Combine points a, b, and c like this: Picture 1 of the 6 sides of the Rubik's Cube and follow
e) Fold up each side, to form 4 walls, a roof and a ceiling. It is now folded and combined with a top and a bottom, forming a 6 sided cube, with 9 squares (3x3), on each side, totaling 54 squares.
f) Take one of the single visualized chessboards, [ ], and replace each square of the 54 squares that make up the entire 3D Rubik's Cube, one side at a time, 6 times, to a depth of 3 layers:
Alternative method:
a) play tic-tac-toe
b) turn the tic-tac-toe games into a cube
c) visualize this as a Rubik's Cube
d) visualize each of the 27 cubes as 8x8x6 chess board cubes
1) Chessboard 8x8
2) A Cube
3) A Rubik's Cube
4) 54 Chessboard's arranged in 2D, externally
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
5) In total, 27 six-sided chess board Rubik's Cubes form a huge grided cube
6) Remember those 32 chess pieces x 2 moving around, visualize what that could look like.
7) Remember the knight's movement again, as a line / in (2D), and up, up, and over (3D).
8) Note - In rocket league, your "car" can move, just like any chess piece does, including the knights!
Note this -
- Single Jump + hold jump = up, up,
- move car to desired position
- Activate the double jump = the over
up up up = the same as up up over, direction is relative.
9) Sphere this cubed Rubik's Cube of 8x8x6x27 we have created.
10) Imagine all the lines making a huge grid, involving many tiny squares
11) Externalize everything you imagined internally - Nothing exists inside the ball.
12) Everything you visualized happening chaotically inside the cube is not inside, happening at all, it is the possibilities of all outside moves, none of which can happen all at once, without adding in any 4D or space-time related elements.
13) Externalize this 8x8x6x3x3x32x2 movement as fixed possibilities inside of the Rocket League arenas, on a grid of equal or greatened complexity (by simply adding more chessboards before conceptualizing out of 2D form).
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
14) You can see this movement by watching the ball go into the goal slowly.
15) The ball exists only in reality, and in Rocket League, as the 2D outer white ring, when this crosses the goal-line fully, a score is tallied and another set of the game begins, there are multiple starting positions, unlike chess and pool, which adds complexity.
There is also a 3D conceptualization of the 4D hyper-sphere ball, that will be warped by distance and speed, from a sphere to an oval shape, conceptualized by another circular shape.
16) Final notes - Remember - Anything above 3D becomes a game of perspective, something Rocket League incorporated sneakily.
17) Freeplay is from your perspective only, which is why it is intrinsically easier.
In freeplay this 4D Hypersphere is being manipulated and viewed from only 2 perspectives:
- Your "car" cam
- Your "ball" cam
-The ball [Fixed 4D mutual perspective]
The ball is a 1D point, encompassed by an outer white circle) the sphere never moves, in 3D, not really.
The sphere's position, from and of, whatever current 4D perspective, can be observed by the inner white circle, this shows the superposition of the 4D object relative to the fixed 1D point.
This ball camera can be viewed in game, without mods, the replay area itself is a huge hint to all of this. The replay area itself shows detailed controls, and detailed control bindings, for a reason; it shows how to manipulate the 4D perspective.
a) In a 1v1, there are even more perspectives added which can manipulate the 4D perspectives, from these perspectives, all differential:
- Your "car" cam
- Your "ball" cam
- Opponent's "car" cam
- Opponent's "ball" cam
- The ball itself
[It is a fixed point from the start of each game, the ball never moves, not really, everything revolves around the ball's perspective]
b) In a 2v2:
- Your "car" cam
- Your "ball" cam
- Your teammate's "car" cam
- You teammate's "ball" cam
- Opponent #1's "car" cam
- Opponent #1's "ball" cam
- Opponent #2's "car" cam
- Opponent #2's "ball" cam
- The ball itself
c) In a 3v3:
- Your "car" cam
- Your "ball" cam
- Your teammate #1's "car" cam
- Your teammate #1's "ball" cam
- Your teammate #2's "car" cam
- Your teammate #2's "ball" cam
- Opponent #1's "car" cam
- Opponent #1's "ball" cam
- Opponent #2's "car" cam
- Opponent #2's "ball" cam
- Opponent #2's "car" cam
- Opponent #2's "ball" cam
- The ball itself
[It is a fixed point from the start of each game, the ball never moves, not really, everything revolves around the ball's perspective]
How can we conceptualize what this all means?
In a 1v1:
a) The ball, at the start of the game is like the central Sun
b) Revolving around the central "sun" are 4 objects: 2 relative (cars) with (1x2) superimposed state's each (2x ball cam's).
So:
A) The Sun [ball]
B) Your Earth [car]
C) Your Earth's superimposed moon [Your Ball Cam]
D) Your Opponent's Earth [their car]
E) Your opponent's superimposed moon [their ball cam]
#1)Your car in "car" cam - relative
#2) Your can in "ball" cam - superimposed state
#3) You never know what camera the opponent has hit the ball in, you have to read their body language, so to speak, but it remains impossible at higher levels .
How to fully manipulate / control / see into the 4D space:
You have to change a few keybindings, as 4D is about 3D control + perspective control:
1) Ball Cam HAS to be set on HOLD, not toggle
2) Ball Cam button HAS to be on a trigger (L2)
3) Camera perspective toggle speed you want on the lowest setting, to start with.
4) Now - Practice pressing L2 slowly as gently as you can, you are controlling your perspective; watch your camera move.
5) Bind different keys along side this binding, notice you can move and see differently, completely, but the reasoning and muscle memory behind this is low to non-existent. Bind multiple things to this L2 button, experiment with camera control into unknown space-time.
Remember this -
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
[ X ] [ O ] [ X ]
Think of this now, in its most simplistic form. This is a tic-tac-toe grid, with 3 in a row, in each column. This tic-tac-toe game is solved, this is how the Rocket League's playing field starts:
- the 6 [X]'s, 3 left and 3 right columns, symbolize the position of the big boosts, which there are 6.
- the 3 [O]'s symbolize the fixed 4D points, the singular, fixed starting ball, and the 2 opposing illusory goals, the ball itself can not ever enter without either user's input.
Consider tic-tac-toe when going for boost and ball decisions, it works out always, cat's game (50/50) or solved, (goal or ball won), it works everywhere, but this where tic-tac-toe stops and 3D/4D chess begins.
This game is a mathematical game, with elements of deceit and strategy. Eventually, all players will be able to hit and control the physical objects, so the chess will come out.
Players will stick to set boost patterns, using the small boosts, and only slightly deviate, and slowly, like two boxer's squaring off - The perceived randomness or inconsistency will be realized as 4D and controllable, no RNG is found; this is Rocket League!
bro hit the character limit on a youtube comment and still thought "lets add some more" impressive
Bro thinking everyone is hip to rocket league
We need a Startalk let’s play series of the Mass Effect trilogy.
Hey Dr. Tyson, Lord Nice, and Dr. Gary, would it be possible to get a a geologist for an explainer and/or discussion video to talk abt Recursive Geological Formations like those found in Lake Victoria, Canadia, or Luzon in the Philippines (also Madagascar & New ZeaLand)? 🤩I would like to know how they formed like it was planned like that. Could AI analyze our current formations and predict how and when if more will pop up within Earth lifetime?
Here's a glaring omission in too many such discussions: Once AI's capabilities begin expanding exponentially, talking of safeguards becomes tantamount to debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
no the final words will be....Hold My Beer!!!!
@46:34 the Terminator movies left out the part about the one perfect society hidden from the surface war when the good ai was fighting the bad ai in all the movies, dont fear the ai, unless your bad!
omg santa is AI???!!!
@user-dv6gt5iw4b the Santa clause in our brains oh my...that little red and white mushroom 🍄🍄🍄🍄🍄🍄🍄😍
@user-dv6gt5iw4b don't talk to strangers unless they break in your house and leave a gift after judging you, then leave snacks while you sleep.. the Santa is definitely something
This is completely unrelated question that will most likely be unanswered but I'll still ask it... I was wondering if we manage somehow to travel close to speed of light to go to distant galaxies we would not be able to travel back to share our findings because billions of years would have passed... Now we know that Photons that travel at the speed of light do not perceive time because to them they reached their destination at the moment that they were created or born... If we would invent teleportation that would deconstruct the object or a person and reconstruct it at different locations by beaming information at the speed of light (by ignoring the argument of "it would not be the same person / object") would that person be reconstructed at the destination instantly and would we be able to visit the distant galaxies that way and come back without time passing by billions of years????
46:19 "The Good A.I. vs. Bad A.I."
Enter: The Foundation series
"The only winning move is not to play." -War Games
It must be nice to have that option. Usually that option is not available.
@@08MikeyT This time it is. Take a look at PauseAI. We can work together to spread awareness and put pressure on governments to make it illegal to try to build AGI.
The alignment problem is still completely unsolved and intractable. There is no version of this where we come out the other side with utopia or a pretty normal world. The labs think they are reinventing intelligence itself, and if they succeed, we are doomed. There's no such thing as "My AGI" or "Your AGI." No one wins this suicide race. There is only the AGI and whatever it wants, and humans are powerless and irrelevant to the future of the world and the cosmos.
whose skateboard is in the background behind Gary?
An odd question. What is that mounted sword behind your right shoulder?
Please interview different AIs and share the comparison
Chuck deserves an honorary degree
Regarding how nobody thought about the totality of the planet until we went to the Moon, don't forget Rachel Carson's wonderful book, The Silent Spring, published in 1962.
Her pushback on the whole "Who is "you?"" Is incredibly close to who I am as a person. Insufferable as it becomes, I am glad to see representation of the fact.
My answer too chuck though if it comes with a wand a sonic hand held
whos that one us president that said once the military industrial complex was a beast that once started will never end? i think were there with AI.
Dewight Iesenhower- was a world warll gen. before president.- good point,thanks
Plot twist, the guy with the eye patch turns out to be a supervillain
Lord nice, always has the great questions 👑❤