Whilst the pro clearly wins with the overall score, many of the games featured worked well enough, But Cyberpunk showed a more noticeable difference to think about one over the other. Overall the Pro might not quite justify the price difference, at least for me. Another good example if an additional comparison would be to add the steam lossless scaling app into the mix that could really show even greater potential for those harder to run titles. It does seem to be a cheap game changer that is deserving of the moniker, so far.
The Steam Lossless Scaling app does seem interesting, but I'm on the skeptical side, especially when it comes to games that area already chugging / difficult to run on a 3D game that has already has FSR running. Either way, it's definitely something I'd be willing to check out in the future, thanks for the heads-up 🙂
I am impressed with these system :) Great CPU performance, very good GPU especially considering it's an iGPU. Very good thermals while gaming. AND option to connect an external gpu if you need it. I am impressed.
*cough* "25k" just for some extra lucky charm 🤣❤️ benchmarks on:1440p with far / lossless scaling / rest via driver would be interesting. I really haven't thought that the difference is so profound. We are moving almost into 780m performance here which is quite impressive
Now.... How would this fare with an external GPU connected vs a mac mini M1 Pro/Max for telasks like davinci resolve 🤔 gaming is great but would be nice to know how these fare against mac minis 😉
If you're on about the 2020 Mac chip, apparently even the Ryzen 6850h trumps that in benchmarks by 170% or something daft. Oculink also beats Thunderbolt 3 by a long shot eliminating the main bandwidth bottleneck I can't really comment on Mac personally, though. I'm not stylish enough to own one.
Okay, so I've just tried Battlefield 1 at 1080p medium on the 6950H, and it's getting around 55-75 FPS in single player. Absolutely playable, runs very smooth 👍
@@r.poelen8141 The HX90G would be faster, but only if it has the 780M GPU onboard. The 680M manages around 50FPS in High 1080p. If you want faster, check a mini pc with a 780M GPU onboard. We've mentioned a few cheaper options in our Amazon Deals video that was uploaded yesterday. ruclips.net/video/3UNJRG3m8xY/видео.html
@@TeamPandory The minisforum hx90/hx99 has an 6600m onboard. But thank you very much for the testing. Now i know i am gonna wait for a newer model or going to switch to the minisforum variant.
O bare-bones é apenas um pouco mais caro, mas se você estiver comparando os outros SKUs, certifique-se de levar em consideração a memória e o armazenamento. Também verificar o site da GMKtec pode dar alguns preços questionáveis de versão - especialmente quando certos modelos entram em liquidação (às vezes você pode obter um modelo muito melhor por mais barato, é insano) 🙃
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Whilst the pro clearly wins with the overall score, many of the games featured worked well enough, But Cyberpunk showed a more noticeable difference to think about one over the other. Overall the Pro might not quite justify the price difference, at least for me.
Another good example if an additional comparison would be to add the steam lossless scaling app into the mix that could really show even greater potential for those harder to run titles. It does seem to be a cheap game changer that is deserving of the moniker, so far.
The Steam Lossless Scaling app does seem interesting, but I'm on the skeptical side, especially when it comes to games that area already chugging / difficult to run on a 3D game that has already has FSR running.
Either way, it's definitely something I'd be willing to check out in the future, thanks for the heads-up 🙂
Pair the pro with a 4080s and you'll notice the difference the cpu makes
Cual gráfica le va mejorar para juegos AAA ,tengo ese modelo 6950
I am impressed with these system :)
Great CPU performance, very good GPU especially considering it's an iGPU.
Very good thermals while gaming.
AND option to connect an external gpu if you need it.
I am impressed.
I knew you'd understand 😉 Now you can see why we concentrated on the new form factor rather than the model in the review video.
@WiseAcres-e4o 78C is a good under load temp for a mini PC or laptop.
42C and 53C are too hot? OK, have a nice day.
@@TrusteftTech 😅
Whats the fastest Ram these can take? 4800mghz?
@@Mitchel_Davis according to AMD spec, yes. But overclock might be possible, will need to check on that.
Is there any memory overclocking options in the bios?
@@coreywiniata3686 not in the bios, with a tool it may be possible though.
@@TeamPandorydid you try to it? If yes, what tool did you use?
Would these PC be able to run League of Legends smoothly?
Yes, easily! 😁
*cough* "25k" just for some extra lucky charm 🤣❤️ benchmarks on:1440p with far / lossless scaling / rest via driver would be interesting. I really haven't thought that the difference is so profound. We are moving almost into 780m performance here which is quite impressive
@@GerritTV187 😂
Yeah we kept all the options fairly vanilla so they can be compared to the intel chips. Did I hear 1440p ultrawide?
Now.... How would this fare with an external GPU connected vs a mac mini M1 Pro/Max for telasks like davinci resolve 🤔 gaming is great but would be nice to know how these fare against mac minis 😉
If you're on about the 2020 Mac chip, apparently even the Ryzen 6850h trumps that in benchmarks by 170% or something daft. Oculink also beats Thunderbolt 3 by a long shot eliminating the main bandwidth bottleneck
I can't really comment on Mac personally, though. I'm not stylish enough to own one.
Can you plz test Battlefield 1 on these 2 systems? Cant find any decent benchmark .. plz help :)
@@r.poelen8141 oh! I've not even played that game yet but it's in my steam library. Will take a look for you 😊
Okay, so I've just tried Battlefield 1 at 1080p medium on the 6950H, and it's getting around 55-75 FPS in single player. Absolutely playable, runs very smooth 👍
Thnx for the help. I want to play it on high minimum so will wait a few upgrades from gmktec :)
Or just going for the hx90g maybe
@@r.poelen8141 The HX90G would be faster, but only if it has the 780M GPU onboard. The 680M manages around 50FPS in High 1080p.
If you want faster, check a mini pc with a 780M GPU onboard. We've mentioned a few cheaper options in our Amazon Deals video that was uploaded yesterday. ruclips.net/video/3UNJRG3m8xY/видео.html
@@TeamPandory The minisforum hx90/hx99 has an 6600m onboard. But thank you very much for the testing. Now i know i am gonna wait for a newer model or going to switch to the minisforum variant.
nesse caso, acho que pegaria o mais barato.
não vale a pena, pelo o que entrega, ryzen 9 com certeza é a melhor escolha
@@PanacaCat a diferença de desempenho deles é pequena se comparado com a diferença de preço, 100 dolares a mais para uma diferença de 10fps no máximo.
@@dajymadashiro é, eu esqueço que tu mora no brasil. Neste caso a diferença de preço é grande
O bare-bones é apenas um pouco mais caro, mas se você estiver comparando os outros SKUs, certifique-se de levar em consideração a memória e o armazenamento. Também verificar o site da GMKtec pode dar alguns preços questionáveis de versão - especialmente quando certos modelos entram em liquidação (às vezes você pode obter um modelo muito melhor por mais barato, é insano) 🙃
The lowest step for tomorrow is GTX 1660 Ti . Radeon 680M much weaker
The 680m is irrelevant, the oculink port provides a work around that will allow more use of the cpu, I would pair it with a 4080s