thank you so much for your stream; inspirational, diverse, entertaining, intelligent, interesting, nice graphics, well chosen visuals, understandable texts and warm voice!! Happy New Year, Greetings from Switzerland👌👋🙏👍🌠
What a kind and thoughtful comment, thank you so much! Happy New Year to you as well, and warm greetings from the UK! Here's to a year filled with curiosity and discovery, thank you for watching and for your wonderful support!
Thank you for sharing! The concept of time is indeed one of the most fascinating and complex ideas in physics. It’s measured relative to certain standards, but as theories like relativity suggest, our experience of time can vary depending on factors like gravity and speed. Do you think we might discover a completely new way of understanding or measuring time in the future? I’d love to hear more about your perspective!
That's a profound question. From a cosmic perspective, some might say life’s purpose is to explore, evolve, and understand the universe we’re a part of. Others might find purpose in connections, creativity, or simply experiencing the beauty of existence. What’s amazing is how each of us can shape our own meaning, what do you think gives life its purpose? I'd love to hear your thoughts!
Questioning existence and belief is at the core of understanding ourselves and the universe. Do you think we shape our reality, or does reality shape us?
You have to assume we could exist in in someones brain and what ww think exist out in the universe could be synaptic responses none of us can explain the processes of the brain the question is what is scale
Magnetic forces-they’re indeed incredibly strong on small scales! However, gravity operates differently, shaping massive structures like galaxies over vast distances. Dark matter’s gravitational pull explains phenomena that visible matter and forces, including magnetism, cannot account for. It’s a fascinating interplay of forces in the universe!
I dont think dark matter exists. Dark matter is needed/invented/made up, in order for an assumption to be good/true. The assumption that the universe was, and expanded , for matter concerned, uniformly. If pple keep insisting all matter spreaded uniformly through universe, yes then we need something that explains all abbreviations from unifromly spread matter. In short, if pple would accept the possibility not all matter spread uniformly through universe, then we dont need 'dark matter or dark energy' to explain things. Because when not spread uniformly, all 'abbreviation' can be explained by normal laws of physics. (Btw I also find it hard to belive there was only 1 'big bang' were seeing the remnants of our big bang, but i believe 50 billion lightyear away, there 'life' experiences the remnants of their 'big bang'.) All these discussions in astrophysics, like 'hubble tension' are only discussions between the believes/assumptions of different scientists. Theyre arguing whether their or other assumptions are true. Its all assumptions, remember that.
And we know so little i feel. Its kinda like the era in history where pple thought the earth was the center of the universe. Pple then knew too little, couldnt observe things we can observe now. But i think we are still in such a phase, we just cant see/observe all. And therefore do a lot of misleading assumptions, it feels.
Like the assumption, ther is nothing faster then the speed of light.... ask uself why this is a 'law' in physics. Then one would find out, it has todo with the limitations of human observability. We cannot see faster then light-waves, cause our receptors, our eyes, are based on light-waves. Thats why we say there is nothing faster then light. There is nothing because we cant see it, its is too fast for us to see. this is kind of reverse reasoning.
Thank you for sharing such a detailed perspective! It’s true that scientific theories often stem from assumptions and interpretations of observed phenomena. In the case of dark matter, it’s not about forcing an idea to fit but rather finding the best explanation for evidence like galaxy rotation curves and gravitational lensing, which don’t align with visible matter alone. As for non-uniform matter distribution, you’re right-cosmologists do consider that! The cosmic microwave background shows slight density variations that seeded galaxy formation, but these variations still rely on unseen mass to explain large-scale structure. The idea of multiple "big bangs" is intriguing and aligns with some speculative theories like eternal inflation or a multiverse. Science thrives on questioning assumptions, and it’s through such discussions that we refine our understanding. Thank you for contributing to the conversation-curiosity drives progress!
That’s an interesting stance! While dark matter and energy remain invisible, their existence is strongly supported by indirect evidence like galaxy rotation curves and gravitational lensing. Without them, many observed cosmic phenomena would be difficult to explain. What alternative explanation do you propose?
@@explorationnewreaches, for alternatives, there are *a number* of peer reviewed papers that you can look up. (as an aside: anton petrov did a video about 4 days ago, "Study Suggests Dark Energy Doesn't Exist And Time Dilation Is Everywhere".) and aside from the fact that not a single shred of proof has been found in the 80-or-so years of *believing* that dark matter exists. every new particle they invent to keep flogging this dead horse has come up with *zero* proof. you will find, the better our technology gets, the more we will see that which will make up the "missing matter/mass". jwst has done wonders in the small amount of time, imagine when something a 100 times, a 1000 times, 10000 times more powerful comes online.
Мы мыслями, музыку квантов через очи пропуская, умом своим фильтруя на уста и как через зеркало, но отражаем мир изобретателя слепца, где: Господь отец из квант струны, непрерывно ткал цветы, для ткани мира, и мать Вселенная в бутоне лепестков, квант музыкой ноты подбирала и миром музыки из квантов, наблюдая, ищет дитя *Творца сорванца* что сорвёт «цветочек аленький» и разорвутся струны квантов на мембраны, свернуться как весной лепестки цветов в саду и Вселенная заново перезапуститься и повторяеться под копирку: Господь из лучшего эфира соткал живые струны *Творца и сорванца* и они были созданы не для мира и мир был создан не для них и сгинем вместе с ним и Мы, для лучшего нового мира! Или же есть предел информации у Вселенной и лопнет она от лжи копируемой, что грузим Мы искусно в интеллект через искусственный интеллект.
thank you so much for your stream; inspirational, diverse, entertaining, intelligent, interesting, nice graphics, well chosen visuals, understandable texts and warm voice!! Happy New Year, Greetings from Switzerland👌👋🙏👍🌠
What a kind and thoughtful comment, thank you so much! Happy New Year to you as well, and warm greetings from the UK! Here's to a year filled with curiosity and discovery, thank you for watching and for your wonderful support!
we are not measuring time properly.
I don’t think we’re fully intuned with all of our senses but I’m sure we have the ability to intuitively understand time.
Write a book about it
Thank you for sharing! The concept of time is indeed one of the most fascinating and complex ideas in physics. It’s measured relative to certain standards, but as theories like relativity suggest, our experience of time can vary depending on factors like gravity and speed.
Do you think we might discover a completely new way of understanding or measuring time in the future? I’d love to hear more about your perspective!
You can't because time never existed it's a construct of humans need to align
Woah, Deep
what is the purpose of life???
That's a profound question. From a cosmic perspective, some might say life’s purpose is to explore, evolve, and understand the universe we’re a part of. Others might find purpose in connections, creativity, or simply experiencing the beauty of existence. What’s amazing is how each of us can shape our own meaning, what do you think gives life its purpose? I'd love to hear your thoughts!
There is no purpose at all.
If there's no backdrop to contrast with, the universe has all the existence of a ghost and life is the futility manifest
More like do you exist and if you believe you do then why ... Do you believe everything people tell you 🤔
Questioning existence and belief is at the core of understanding ourselves and the universe. Do you think we shape our reality, or does reality shape us?
You have to assume we could exist in in someones brain and what ww think exist out in the universe could be synaptic responses none of us can explain the processes of the brain the question is what is scale
No.
Have you ever used the invisible power of a magnet. Dark matter??? Gravity is a weak force compared to magnetic forces.😃
Magnetic forces-they’re indeed incredibly strong on small scales! However, gravity operates differently, shaping massive structures like galaxies over vast distances. Dark matter’s gravitational pull explains phenomena that visible matter and forces, including magnetism, cannot account for. It’s a fascinating interplay of forces in the universe!
I dont think dark matter exists. Dark matter is needed/invented/made up, in order for an assumption to be good/true. The assumption that the universe was, and expanded , for matter concerned, uniformly. If pple keep insisting all matter spreaded uniformly through universe, yes then we need something that explains all abbreviations from unifromly spread matter.
In short, if pple would accept the possibility not all matter spread uniformly through universe, then we dont need 'dark matter or dark energy' to explain things. Because when not spread uniformly, all 'abbreviation' can be explained by normal laws of physics.
(Btw I also find it hard to belive there was only 1 'big bang' were seeing the remnants of our big bang, but i believe 50 billion lightyear away, there 'life' experiences the remnants of their 'big bang'.)
All these discussions in astrophysics, like 'hubble tension' are only discussions between the believes/assumptions of different scientists. Theyre arguing whether their or other assumptions are true.
Its all assumptions, remember that.
And we know so little i feel. Its kinda like the era in history where pple thought the earth was the center of the universe. Pple then knew too little, couldnt observe things we can observe now. But i think we are still in such a phase, we just cant see/observe all. And therefore do a lot of misleading assumptions, it feels.
Like the assumption, ther is nothing faster then the speed of light.... ask uself why this is a 'law' in physics. Then one would find out, it has todo with the limitations of human observability. We cannot see faster then light-waves, cause our receptors, our eyes, are based on light-waves. Thats why we say there is nothing faster then light. There is nothing because we cant see it, its is too fast for us to see. this is kind of reverse reasoning.
Thank you for sharing such a detailed perspective! It’s true that scientific theories often stem from assumptions and interpretations of observed phenomena. In the case of dark matter, it’s not about forcing an idea to fit but rather finding the best explanation for evidence like galaxy rotation curves and gravitational lensing, which don’t align with visible matter alone.
As for non-uniform matter distribution, you’re right-cosmologists do consider that! The cosmic microwave background shows slight density variations that seeded galaxy formation, but these variations still rely on unseen mass to explain large-scale structure.
The idea of multiple "big bangs" is intriguing and aligns with some speculative theories like eternal inflation or a multiverse. Science thrives on questioning assumptions, and it’s through such discussions that we refine our understanding. Thank you for contributing to the conversation-curiosity drives progress!
"The Mystery of Dark Matter - The Unseen Framework of the Universe"
*dark. matter/energy. does. not. exist.*
That’s an interesting stance! While dark matter and energy remain invisible, their existence is strongly supported by indirect evidence like galaxy rotation curves and gravitational lensing. Without them, many observed cosmic phenomena would be difficult to explain. What alternative explanation do you propose?
@@explorationnewreaches,
for alternatives, there are *a number* of peer reviewed papers that you can look up. (as an aside: anton petrov did a video about 4 days ago, "Study Suggests Dark Energy Doesn't Exist And Time Dilation Is Everywhere".) and aside from the fact that not a single shred of proof has been found in the 80-or-so years of *believing* that dark matter exists. every new particle they invent to keep flogging this dead horse has come up with *zero* proof. you will find, the better our technology gets, the more we will see that which will make up the "missing matter/mass". jwst has done wonders in the small amount of time, imagine when something a 100 times, a 1000 times, 10000 times more powerful comes online.
Мы мыслями, музыку квантов через очи пропуская, умом своим фильтруя на уста и как через зеркало, но отражаем мир изобретателя слепца, где: Господь отец из квант струны, непрерывно ткал цветы, для ткани мира, и мать Вселенная в бутоне лепестков, квант музыкой ноты подбирала и миром музыки из квантов, наблюдая, ищет дитя *Творца сорванца* что сорвёт «цветочек аленький» и разорвутся струны квантов на мембраны, свернуться как весной лепестки цветов в саду и Вселенная заново перезапуститься и повторяеться под копирку: Господь из лучшего эфира соткал живые струны *Творца и сорванца* и они были созданы не для мира и мир был создан не для них и сгинем вместе с ним и Мы, для лучшего нового мира! Или же есть предел информации у Вселенной и лопнет она от лжи копируемой, что грузим Мы искусно в интеллект через искусственный интеллект.