Royal family: Cost of monarchy 'far greater than figure quoted' says Norman Baker

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
  • 'The cost is actually much greater than the figure quoted today.'
    Former minister Norman Baker discusses the taxpayer funding of the monarchy increasing by 17% over the last year.
    Watch on TV: Freeview 236, Sky 515, Virgin 626
    Listen on DAB+ Radio
    Download the GB News App to watch live wherever you are, catch up with all our shows and get the latest news from the GBN family. www.gbnews.uk/...
    Don't forget to follow us on social media too!
    Twitter: / gbnews
    Facebook: / gbnewsonline
    Instagram: / gbnewsonline
    LinkedIn: / gb-news
    TikTok: / gbnews
    Click here for the latest Covid-19 guidance from the World Health Organisation ► www.who.int/em...
    Click here for the latest NHS information on COVID-19 vaccines
    www.nhs.uk/con...

Комментарии • 42

  • @rickyj5547
    @rickyj5547 2 года назад +7

    Useless waste of your money and time. The useless royal family soap opera corporation Ltd show for the tourists.

    • @Fordnan
      @Fordnan 4 месяца назад

      If only the deal were sweetened with that silly tourism thing being factually-correct rather than just an attempt to justify the monarchy post-hoc.

  • @JWS1968
    @JWS1968 2 года назад +5

    With regard to bullying in the workplace if a person uses their power to get away with bullying a member of staff, they need to be punished and exposed.

  • @justfinereally88
    @justfinereally88 2 года назад +9

    How is it that us slaves here in Canada don’t get an increase in our earnings 😡

    • @jimbo6059
      @jimbo6059 2 года назад +3

      Well you dont pay for the monarch. You may pay for her representative, the Governor General.

  • @btn2045
    @btn2045 2 года назад +3

    Waste of money. Abolish the monarchy

  • @kristandevries4835
    @kristandevries4835 2 года назад +14

    It is nothing more than a expensive soap.

  • @miranda4903
    @miranda4903 2 года назад +15

    I think Prince Charles doesn’t seem to be a very good judge of character - Jimmy Saville!
    Also, money in a suitcase, always looks suspicious 🤨

  • @juliawigger9796
    @juliawigger9796 2 года назад +4

    Both Duke of Yorks kids still live off our taxpayer's, but married to millionaires. We shouldn't pay at all for them.

    • @suegroizard415
      @suegroizard415 2 года назад +1

      Get your facts right! Neither live of the taxpayer they both have jobs they don't receive security and any residents they live in they pay tax!

    • @juliawigger9796
      @juliawigger9796 2 года назад +3

      @@suegroizard415 they both get money off daddy. And very miffed when the Queen wouldn't give them houses.

  • @djbogz1921
    @djbogz1921 2 года назад +16

    We are funding their nice lifestyle.
    Down with the monarchy

  • @justfinereally88
    @justfinereally88 2 года назад +7

    David Icke talked about this years ago 😉🐍🦎 😂

    • @AndyDrudy
      @AndyDrudy 2 года назад

      David Icke thinks the Royal family are Space lizard people!

  • @markallan3842
    @markallan3842 2 года назад +5

    Colossal waste of public money that could go to much more deserving services how in the 21st century is this still tolerated !

    • @suegroizard415
      @suegroizard415 2 года назад

      Mark Allen, And pray tell what would you rather spend your tax money on? The lazy morons who sit on benefits row each year producing child after child so they don't have to work, or the illegal immigrants that flock to our shores by the droves each day that cost £5 MILLION+ per day or the billions we are pouring into the ukraine, or perhaps you want your money to pay for immigrants who break the law and we have to pay their legal fees for them, and then we are told we cannot deport them because it contravenes their human rights! I know were I'd rather my money went! Paying for a monachy that does a lot of good for this country ,who by just a visit can command thousands of pounds for charity's, who by just wearing a piece of clothing can bolster a business,the duchess of cambridge has helped many a high street shop by choosing their products, can you say the same for any of the above? What would you rather have a joe biden like state or what we have, the royal family are more stable than a president and do far more for this country globally,

  • @andrewoliver8930
    @andrewoliver8930 2 года назад +10

    That lovely sweet old lady turns out to be a money grabber. Shock news.
    Don't you ask for a pay rise. We need the lower earners to pay for Queen Bee and her lovely offspring.
    🤣

  • @johnnyreggae969
    @johnnyreggae969 2 года назад +3

    The Royal family has to go ,Britain has to grow up why do we need a special family ??

  • @pattytada9117
    @pattytada9117 2 года назад +4

    Prince Charles apparently has earned a very shady reputation that persons feel comfortable stuffing cash into shopping bags and handing it to him lol

  • @ALLTHEGODSMF
    @ALLTHEGODSMF 2 года назад +1

    ❤ 🇬🇧🧒 Mr Baker ❤👨‍👩‍👧‍👦🌍

  • @ΑντωνηςΜανωλαγκας
    @ΑντωνηςΜανωλαγκας 2 года назад +1

    The female presenter needs to stop the botox

  • @uingaeoc3905
    @uingaeoc3905 2 года назад +3

    Baker is talking nonsense. 1) The 'taxpayer' does not pay ANYTHING. The Crown Estate the royal property is managed by the Government generates a huge fortune a fraction of which is then allocated to the COSTS of the Monarchy eg Palaces and staff and running costs along with the costs of the Royal Family's official duties, it is these from which Andrew, Harry and Megan have now been excluded. There is NO income paid to the Queen.
    2) The Queen and Charles do pay tax on their assets and personal income - the Duchy of Lancaster and of Cornwall - this is not part of the Crown Estate.
    3) Inheritance tax - you people are surely aware of the origins of taxation and what a Monarchy is? The King taxed his subjects for the shortfall in national expenditure ABOVE his own income. That required Parliament's approval. The Crown Estate - see above- is the King's income and that pays for the monarchy.

    • @adrianrouse5148
      @adrianrouse5148 2 года назад +4

      What about all the other land and homes owned by this family. Not state owned but privately. Look at all the complaints coming from Cornwall and the blood sucking duchy of Cornwall. I think after the Queen it's time to stop.

    • @uingaeoc3905
      @uingaeoc3905 2 года назад +1

      @@adrianrouse5148 "ahh but whataboutery" Neither here nor there - I have already explained what the point off Monarchy is. What is the 'blood sucking' of Cornwall/ There are NO 'complaints' just whines and whinges. If this proeprty belonged to the local councils it would be the same. It is the endowment of the future monarch. Why is it you cannot accept that the UK system is a constitutional monarchy. Please tell me about the money you give your eldest so we can double tax that for you.

    • @Fordnan
      @Fordnan 4 месяца назад

      No, he knows what he's talking about. You're parroting propaganda. The crown estate is not, nor has it ever been the personal property of the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family.

  • @peterdowdall8972
    @peterdowdall8972 2 года назад +1

    As a tax payer i don't mind supporting our queen and her family look at the mount of tax payers money we waste on putting the dinghy people in hotel's so our royals are value for money

    • @Fordnan
      @Fordnan 4 месяца назад

      We're paying them to undermine our democracy. That might be value for money for our establishment, it certainly isn't value for money for the rest of us.

  • @lisetbernal8697
    @lisetbernal8697 2 года назад +5

    So worthed ! The amout the firm brings to the English people is 3 times more out of turism and sales period!

    • @adrianrouse5148
      @adrianrouse5148 2 года назад +3

      That would not change with no monarchy. The Queen is rarely at Buckingham palace. The Pope is rarely at the Vatican.

    • @Fordnan
      @Fordnan 4 месяца назад

      Even if that were true (and it isn't), that by no means compensates for the massive democratic and social cost of the monarchy.

  • @AndyDrudy
    @AndyDrudy 2 года назад

    And just check out the recent history of Venuzuela to discover the cost of socialism!

    • @Fordnan
      @Fordnan 4 месяца назад +1

      What does that have to do with anything?