2024 AP Precalculus Free Response #2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • Walkthrough of the 2024 AP Precalculus FRQ #2
    Website: www.bothellstem...
    PDF Solutions: www.bothellste...
    Link to College Board FRQs: apcentral.coll...
    AP® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this content.

Комментарии • 20

  • @AllenTsaoSTEMCoach
    @AllenTsaoSTEMCoach  3 месяца назад +3

    Corrections:
    Part A) The equation should be a + b ln(92) = 76, so when you solve for b, you get 7.961.

  • @moniquemaynard2073
    @moniquemaynard2073 3 месяца назад +1

    C. A_t < G(t) because the secant line of A_t will always be below the concave down curve for G(t) on the interval.

  • @stephenbeck7222
    @stephenbeck7222 3 месяца назад

    For B (iii) the intention on this part (for almost all different ways that Biii could be asked no matter the form) is to discuss the concavity of the model. For a concave down curve like the log function here: If the average rate of change is formed over the interval (m,n), then the secant line will always be below the model for points inside (m,n) and above the model for points outside (m,n). And of course the opposite over/underestimates for concave up models. I think FRQ2 will always be using a quadratic, exponential, or logarithmic model (or something very similar) where you can tell the concavity just from the sign/magnitude of the parameters you found in part A, without even needing to graph.

    • @AllenTsaoSTEMCoach
      @AllenTsaoSTEMCoach  3 месяца назад

      Yeah I see that now. Interesting how they ask and have students look at it that way.

  • @zacharygibson8344
    @zacharygibson8344 3 месяца назад +1

    If kept in thousands, would it only be one point off b/c of error carried forward?

  • @Wish987
    @Wish987 3 месяца назад +1

    Why would keeping in thousands lose full credit it says nothing about specific units

  • @wolfcanyon
    @wolfcanyon 3 месяца назад

    7:28 POV you’re trying not to say the natural logarithm function is concave down on a precalc frq 😂

    • @AllenTsaoSTEMCoach
      @AllenTsaoSTEMCoach  3 месяца назад

      Haha I know. I forgot if they talk about concavity in the precalculus course description. I should have just looked it up

  • @hanchengpeng2266
    @hanchengpeng2266 3 месяца назад +6

    Bro i kept it in thousands💀 Will i get partial credit?

    • @erinzhang303
      @erinzhang303 3 месяца назад

      That’s what I did 😭

  • @nadobot7626
    @nadobot7626 3 месяца назад +1

    Do u still get credit if you don’t put the unit after the answer?

    • @BaDaBaBaBa_wiwi
      @BaDaBaBaBa_wiwi 3 месяца назад +1

      I was gonna ask, you are not alone

    • @stephenbeck7222
      @stephenbeck7222 3 месяца назад

      For B (i), you shouldn’t need to put units. The units are already in the question and they’re pretty good about asking for units specifically when they want them.

  • @aaritatreja9766
    @aaritatreja9766 3 месяца назад +1

    Shouldn't it be a + b ln(92) = 76 for the second equation, because the equation is a + b ln (x + 1)? Doing so gives me 7.961 for (A, ii)

    • @Blosp
      @Blosp 3 месяца назад

      it should be a + b ln(91+1) = 76 and a + b ln(0+1) = 40 cause i don't think you should simplify the equation

    • @riven7718
      @riven7718 3 месяца назад

      Yea u are right it should be 92

  • @solquiroz8437
    @solquiroz8437 3 месяца назад

    what if i kept my answers in thousands?

  • @jordan8010
    @jordan8010 3 месяца назад

    I kept in the thousands😢

    • @hanchengpeng2266
      @hanchengpeng2266 3 месяца назад

      Same, do you think we’ll get partial credit?

    • @jordan8010
      @jordan8010 3 месяца назад

      @@hanchengpeng2266 hopefully