I like to say we’re all cousins. Just this evening my husband and I were at a dig and I looked at the dirt and it was so beautiful. I asked my husband “ what did God make Adam from?” “Dirt” he responds. I smiled and said “Look at the soil, see the variation of colours. One for every shade of skin of the human race. We’re all in there. Every variation of skin colour all wrapped up in the dirt that Adam was made from. Praise the Lord.”
My oldest kids went to school in a small town in S. France. When the teacher (who was a communist) tried to teach evolution, my oldest daughter forcefully asked, "Do you believe this? Do you know for a fact that this is true?" The teacher backed off and changed her approach to, "Some people believe ..." Later that year we met with the teacher and she told us, "When I see your kids and think about your family, it makes me think about God."
How the teacher is 🦒 she is a supernaturally smart person because of how she responds 🐿 Not judgmental but understanding, wise, discerning, nice, respectful, and godly 🦫 If I ever see this person in real life 🌳 I would like her! 🐈⬛
What a beautiful testament, from the mouths of babes, causing even the most unlikely of persons to consider the existence of our heavenly Father.!! Hallelujah and Amen.!!
I went to public schools in Sydney growing up and I remember being taught Evolution during primary school and was very confused as to where the apes that we evolved from came from and I remember saying to my teacher, ‘we came from Adam & Eve, they were people not apes!’ And she said, the cavemen came first which confused me and other students Then in high school, during science, teacher tried to explain the BigBang theory and my classroom rebelled calling out, ‘No! God created the world!” Teacher threw his hands up in the air because we all insisted and saying, this is lies Sir! Gone are those days, now everyone believes the lie. So thankful that creationist are standing up now, bringing back the truth.
Awesome! You're the first person I've come across that tells a similar story as the one I have told on several occasions. My Jr. High science class teacher was taping a 4 or 5 ft long poster of the ascent of man above the chalkboard, and I told him the same thing. "We are not apes, sir, we're people! We're children of God! And besides, don't you think you should wait until you find the missing link? Because the ones you guys are using have been exposed as frauds!..." He really did not like having a scrawny kid telling him his "theory" was floundering. And here we are over 45 years later and the best they have is a string of debunked missing links that they relentlessly parade around as if there isn't a flaw in them! Lucy has been proven to be a chimpanzee for years, now, and the scientist's assertions about all the missing parts resembling humans have been fully dismissed by examining the many specimens of the same species found since Lucy was found! The chimp's fingers are curved, the feet are chimp feet, the hip is a chimp hip, the head is a chimp head, etc! If we were to place Lucy's fully articulated and intact skeleton (as she was when she was alive) right next to a fully articulated and intact human specimen there would be absolutely no question! Lucy's a chimp and we are not!! But apparently, evolutionists have simply resolved themselves to lying whenever it's necessary. Mostly, to themselves, unfortunately! Otherwise, we wouldn't have the Albatros of evolution hanging around the neck of scientific progress and education!
@@lederereddy Exactly! It starts with atheist scientists, then teachers are told to teach lies to us but some of us and children of today truly can’t see the logic. I have a Christian friend who was a school teacher and she believes Lucy is legitimate, I also told her there’s no missing link, she is adamant that they’ve found it, she’s seen it! I told her, it’s rubber! Still she believes in evolution and the Bible The brainwashing runs deep! But not for you and me! ‘high five!’ You’re too smart! ✝️
@@lisaseverino5114 --- " I have a Christian friend who was a school teacher and she believes Lucy is legitimate" It is TRAGIC to see how schools have undermined the student's ability to be objective. The curriculum is deliberately designed to instill subjective secular biases as deeply as possible. And your friend has succumbed to the literal bombardment of evolutionary dogma, probably based on the simple fact that she can't imagine so many intelligent people could possibly be wrong. And, obviously, she doesn't believe the bible is really God's word even if she says she does. A quick study of the laws of logic and the scientific method would affirm the fact that objectivity (existential physical evidence) is the road to unbiased truth. But secularists' unwritten laws such as "all scientific inquiries into nature must be answered by naturalistic causes!" Or "During the observation of biologists into the intricacies of biological organisms, the biologist must constantly remind themselves that the designs they're seeing were not intentional even if they look intentional!" That is the definition of forsaking the objectivity of laws of logic and science and being led astray by the subjectiveness of personal bias! God help us, but these fundamental truths have been eroded so badly that people really don't understand how to separate the truth from lies, anymore. We must lovingly remind whoever will listen! And, yes! High-five each other for standing strong on God's infallible Word! Aloha and God bless! I will pray for you and your friend!
@@lederereddy I love what you said, you are spot on as my friend doesn’t believe the story of Adam & Eve. My friend is highly intelligent but truly doesn’t believe but believes in millions of years ago. I did so poorly at school and was terribly raised so I’ve always had to cling to God. Not too many people believe me but I’ve had 2 visions and I’ve had many spiritual encounters with Jesus and angels and no, I do not take drugs. Jesus told me about fake news was coming back in 2007 how Satan will use every screen to hypnotise the young and that He God is seperating sheep from goats- the end of the age. He said it will get really bad, then he’ll fix it! He’s using Ken Ham.
And so it is... the "big bang" and "evil~lucien" both part of the grand delusion. See how it will all come together, along with "aliens" and the "ufo" paradigm, to steer as many people away from the truth as is possible... so much so, that even the elect would be deceived if it were possible.!! Be not deceived. Not by the fallen angels, not by man, not by demons claiming to be what they are not. Be not deceived. The bible tells us the truth of all things that we are able to comprehend. And, while there are still mysteries, accept that we are not to know all things. Be not deceived. Coming is the greatest of lies, meant to diminish the truth, destroy faith, deny Christ Jesus and attempt to make a liar of our heavenly Father...believe it not.!! Again and again, the scriptures warnings hold that we be not deceived. He who called out the end at the beginning, loved us enough to issue warnings of what would happen, told us of the signs to watch for, and reminded us that all things are possible but ONLY through him. May our heavenly Father bless and keep his own, strengthening us for what is yet to come and instilling the peace that passes all understanding... in Jesus mighty name.
Dr. Nathanial Jeanson is the most important scientist in modern history. The conclusions reached in this scientific study are not hard to see or accept by anyone with a mind open to truth. May this help to bring many, many of these people to God thru our saviour Yeshua (Jesus).
These 2 verses are proven true by the work of Dr Jeanson 🙌 👌 make a tree good and it's fruit will be good. Bible. Matthew 10:26 [26]Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known. Bible. Matthew 13:9 [9]Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
@@timothyyoung4463 to think Daniel saw this from the captivity in Babylon Bible. Daniel 12:1-4,7 [1]And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. [2]And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. [3]And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever. [4]But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased. [7]And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.
@@kateescarlet9693 but where are you in all of this...this seeking for the truth of things. You know...the important things like where did we come from? Why are we here? What is our purpose? Who knows the truth? ....The one who values it above money, gold, diamonds, power, etc.
'The most important scientist in modern history' Are the rest of the world's scientists aware of this fact? The most important scientists, actually, all scientists, publish their work in relevant peer reviewed journals. They don't publish pseudo-scientific apologetics books.
I love Ken Hamm I first found his videos at a Homeschool convention in Wichita KS Approximately 25 years ago and I was fascinated! I still am at this scientific evidence that overwhelmingly supports the Bible and God's creation.
There is a sweetness to the integrity and earnestness of these folks. They don’t quite have the science down too well - but we could do worse than listen to their underlying philosophy. My only recommendation is that they trust their faith more than they do … if genesis began 14 billion years ago with the Big Bang - how is that less awesome than a quaint imagined account in the Bible citing 6,000 years ago. 11:45 How is that any less the hand of something profoundly magnificent - call it natural law or God. How is it not the hand of an immensity beyond all understanding. This is not lost if we learn now that it wasn’t six days of creation 6,000 years ago. It may not be a personal God - but do we know that one way or another? Room for faith there don’t you think? I am amazed. I don’t see a reason to laugh at these folks or for them to condemn me for having somewhat different takes on something astoundingly profound.
When young people going to college or university have to sit exams and to give answers that are in the 'science' text books but that they know to be absolutely wrong, they must give the wrong answer to pass the exam, or they will fail and/or be considered revolutionist! This is some battle that 'we' are in! I am grateful for the amazing work you have done and now we have an ultimately powerful and provable physical link to our Creator, thus prooving the all importsnt Spiritual link. The unbreakable link.
I always had questions as a child into adulthood. This is wonderful and validates everything I felt and explored. Your linguist you need to contact is Dr Nehemia Gordon. The discoverer and validated the Hebrew Book of Matthew. Dead Seas Scrolls Scholar and Awesome Person!!!!
Dr. Gordon is da bomb ❤ Keith Johnson and Torah Pearls are also da bomb ❤ I came across Dr. G through A Rood Awakening a few years ago, and he was giving a talk near me so I went. He's the nicest man, came out and shook my hand, said welcome to my talk
He is literally proving the Bible and still he says if the Bible is correct. Of course it is correct praise God and I thank him for these men for proving this for others to turn to him for salvation.
Thank you! Wonderful job in your pursuit of details of the DNA evidence and generating an increasing mou tain of evidence the truth of the Biblical history! A worldview shattering result, Hallelujah!
“Haplogroup E and DE have an Middle Eastern origin (per Cabrera et al. 2018[1]). Haplogroup E migrated into Africa as part of a massive migration of "Basal-Eurasians" (Ancestral West-Eurasians) and than diffused and diversified within Africa, specifically the Horn of Africa (Northeast Africa). Haplogroup DE, next to CF, were the Basal-Eurasian lineages which expanded from the Middle East. The common ancestral lineage ("YDNA Adam") is suggested to have originated somewhere in the Middle East or the Iranian Plateau (per Arnason et al. 2020”
Keep up the great work and be encouraged! We greatly appreciate what you are doing. Some scripture to remember... A scoffer seeks wisdom and finds none, But knowledge is easy to one who has understanding. Also... Anyone who rebukes a mocker will get an insult in return. Anyone who corrects the wicked will get hurt. So don't bother correcting mockers; they will only hate you. But correct the wise, and they will love you. I personally think that any comments that involve mocking, even those that seem "for" you, just pass right over them and focus on the people with genuine concerns. That should save you a lot of wasted effort. May He continue to bless your work.
Good advice although sometimes I can't help myself, It can be a chance to leave a bible verse or passage. I have been watching Dr Jeanson for about a year and a half. The clock in our DNA sure beats the isochron dating method that dates nothing with any accuracy. These chunks of our real history are provable and back up the timeline of the bible. Great work.
@perfectblindguy That wouldn't surprise me. But Jesus (who we believe is the same God) also refused to throw a stone when the adulterer was brought before Him. Why do you think that is? Why the vastly different reaction to basically the same sin? There is an answer by the way. And it's a GOOD one.
You can literally see the root word “genes” in it “Genesis” That should hit you like a ton of bricks. It’s not a mythology it’s based in bio chemistry which is why God took a rib when he wanted to clone a female from Adam. The human rib contains specific genetic material not found anywhere else the body
@@samuelerighawilliams yes sir it truly does boggle the mind. Even if God wasn’t the first bio chemist ever, how would a Hebrew rabbi, in this case Moses cause that’s who wrote genesis right, how would someone who has no knowledge of bio chemistry because it’s fricken 2000 BC lol be able to concoct something that’s objectively true thousands of years later? “Oh wanna clone a human? No problem let’s start at the ribs” How would people that are making things up know to choose the rib versus literally any other human bone? Now the question being presented is more annoying than the one “is it God or science?” My mind is made up I know that much.
One of the main reasons that a smaller number of Creation scientists can do a better job at proving our theories is that it’s all common sense science. In other words, even though God’s Creation is complicated, He has provided common sense ways of proving our existence.
@@cliftongaither6642 - 2 Peter 3:3-7 “Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming ? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation.” “For they are willfully ignorant that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water.” “But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.”
He doesn’t understand (or intentionally ignores) data that he can’t see but believes in a deity that you can’t see designing everything lol he is not scientifically literate
KJV Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, In the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens, and verse 5!
The beginning of the discussion explains faith, the man says he gets choked up hearing that information. It takes intense emotional reactions to bond with the idea that people have an emotional crutch to lean on in religion, without these overblown feminine reactions you do not get the same result.
@@matthewaislabie7354 not exactly true...he has people of all different views on there. Sometimes he agrees, sometimes he argues...I doubt he'd change his mind on this though. People think it's too kooky regardless of how much evidence you put right in front of their face.
There must be something wrong with this gentleman's argument. We have ice cores that go back 800,000 years. You can count the winters. I suspect a non biblical geneticist would not agree with him.
What fields of science demonstrate there was a global flood? Certainly not geology. ( or biology and all its subfields, genetics, paleontology, Anthropology, etc.) Archaeology.. There are thousands upon thousands of peer-reviewed articles and papers published in relevant science journals; not a single one has ever demonstrated Global flood. Wondering where you got your information from. Science most definitely does not support any Global flood.
19:31 A massive hole in the evolution lie is that everything before Mankind took millions of years to evolve (dinosaurs), but Humans evolved from full on monkies in just a short 200k years? It's inconsistent with their already wacky and wild theory.
TRUTH! God's holy word is the Truth, and Jesus Christ is the Truth incarnate! Oh how I love Jesus, because he first loved and gave Himself for me! His name is called Faithful and True(Rev 19:11, John 14:6) and He is soon coming to reclaim earth"s title deed!
@@CathyAFarr When it becomes "Buy this, and buy that", then it becomes a business instead of a ministry. I hope AIG does not go the way of "merchandising". It is always disappointing when presentations turn into infomercials. The main point of my original comment is that they don't have to worry bout the length or depth of their presentations. The topic is so interesting that I can listen for hours, and I know others who feel the same.
When, did one time believers sell themselves to evilution, no one born again can ever turn away from the written word that is so easily understood, when you search for God with your whole heart. A divided heart will never stand in Gods grace, because it becomes a kingdom divided against itself. I have heard that pastors, when someone come to preach the 6000 yr old existence of the earth are told not to say it ,or to water it down, to maybe or it could have happened. Judgement is beginning in the church, to find out just who the church is. As for my family as many others we have left the people called the church because we became to uncomfortable with their teaching and actions.
That’s right, when you know the lord, you just know that the Bible tells the truth and science is about to find out, too. Like it’s said in the Bible, they all will know the lord in the end times, everyone in the world will, so I think it’s about to happen right now.🙏
This is all fascinating. Have your results been peer reviewed by other experts , and have these been published in any professional academic science journals?
The peer reviews by “ other experts”…..the same ones that admit to just peer reviewing for their colleague friends to help them get published? Sorry, peer reviews have become untrustworthy. Look at the data, retest it, retest it again. Genetics don’t lie.
they would have to admit God is real... creation is not the 'big bang'....they already know this... but will never admit it... this is more for the lay-person, believer and non-believer to show how the bible is true..
@@ruthfreeman864 That’s not how science works. It’s very telling that Dr. Jeanson has neither a degree in these topics nor has he published any articles for peer review. We should just take his word for it? Not how science works
@@CaptainFantastic222 I understand where you’re coming from but I wonder why Dr Jeanson’s work is not reviewed regardless? Why must someone have a specific degree, can’t anyone use science and it’s methods to discover something so why wouldn’t scientists look at this work?
My son had a talent show at school and they told him he could not sing a Christian song I called the principle and explained to him the legal implications of religious discrimination and he allowed my son to sing his Christian song.
Quoted from the above text intro to the video: "...it’s only possible because the researcher, Harvard-trained Dr. Jeanson, starts with the history and the timeline God has given us in his Word." That is the problem. If you start from a premise which you are not allowed to question, you are not doing science, you are doing religion. And just by the by, there is no timeline in the Christian bible. The timeline is inferred by adding up the generations as given in the bible, which may, or may not, be correct. But there is another little devil in the details. There is a mitochondrial Eve, and a Y chromosome Adam which all humns on earth can trace themselves back to. But they weren't the only humans alive at the time. One can easily understand this by just counting back your own lineage. You had 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great-grandparents, 16 great-great grandparents, etc. If we take 25 years as being a generation, and divide 4000 years (since the flood), we get 160 generations. With a doubling of grandparents every generation, that gives us 2 the power of 160. Here's what we get: 1,461,501.637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976. That's a lot of grandparents. That is many more times than all the people that have every lived. Obviously there is something not quite right. The best explanation is given in "River Out Of Eden", by Richard Dawkins. But basically it is this. Not all lineages have offspring. If we go back far enough, we can find the one man, or one woman who were the parents of all existing humans, but...and this is the important but...they were not the only humans alive at the time. It's just that all other lineages died out over the years. The date when modern humans first appeared is widely debated, but is anywhere from 200,000 - 320,000 years ago. Other hominid species existed long before that. The earlest human species (homo habilis) lived between 1.5 - 2.5 million years ago.
Your problem is 25 yrs as a generation. A generation in the bible was the average lifespan of a person and not the ability a of child bearing age. Thus a generation was between 70-80 years in the bible. 13 generations multiplied by 70-80 = 910-1040 BC which was most likely the time of the Babylonian captivity of the Jews. The bible always speaks the truth more than the modern generation does that we find ourselves in today. People get stupider and stupider every generation that goes by.
I look at it like this. God told us what he wanted us to know. We do not need to know how the cake is made not the details of how it’s made. Take it on faith or don’t!
I love these topics relating science and tradition... I would appreciate a throough analysis of this book even by atheists... atheists of goodwil... not the militant haters... the men of goodwill
One problem I perceive with the timing theory is that there are male and female generations. Women tend to breed at an earlier age than men. In history, it may be correct to suggest that men tend to produce their first child at age 25. I would suggest that taking into account history beyond the modern period, 20 would be a better estimate for average earliest breeding age, and for women it would be around 15 or 16 so generations of mtDNA would be approximately 6 per century, whereas for men it would be , let's say 4-5 generations per century. This would accelerate the rates of chromosomal/mtDNA change. It would be good to know whether these variations had any effect on the chronology of the human family tree or whether the 6000 years for mtDNA and 4500 years for Y chromosomal DNA hold up with variations like this. I also wonder if the timing for a generation is better calculated as average age of the parent at birth of the child, rather than first child. Again, female generations will be shorter, as men can continue to breed well beyond youth and into old age, whereas female fertility diminishes rapidly as they progress into middle age. What effect might these factors have on the proposed chronology?
I would love to see Mr. Ham build a “Tower of Babel” near the Ark and have the history of people shown as outlined in the book “Traced”. That would be a great learning tool and help us all to understand how close we all are to each other.
Is anyone doing this tracing in the animal kingdom? We can guess that all land animals should be tracing their lineage back to their ancestors that came off the ark. Ocean mammals could probably trace their lineage back to the original day of creation of the sea animals.
You can’t. The Bible says that the earth is old. This person just doesn’t know the Bible just as most Christian’s don’t. In the Old Testament God talked many times that we were not to intermingle with the different races and explains why. Why is it that people will not study their Bible and in particular the Old Testament. The Bible is about a family. The ethnic races are mentioned when we cross paths only. And no we did not come from one man and woman. A Caucasian cannot have a black baby or a Chinese baby. If he were right then we would be able to. So silly.
@@tomjackson3411 sorry to burst that "black v white skin pigmentation myth you have been ascribed to, BUT some tears ago creation magazine ran an article about an English couple who had twin babies, may have even been identical twins if memory serves correctly. One was very dark skinned, the other white by comparison. Adam and Eve had the fullness of the jeanpool, including the so called races that are variations in melatonin in that part of our DNA. Science is observable, and this couple would not have even imagined they would have twins let alone with two very different skin colours.
@@NilodeRoock don’t fall victim to their lies please, the Bible never once says the earth is old and evolution and God don’t mix because adding paganism to the Bible never works. The reason we have other “races” which are still the human race which is why that term has always confused me is because the different people adapted to different environments over time (not millions of years) but a few generations because if you are outside in the heat all the time and it’s a very dry place then you are going to end up being darker skinned like when people tan you tan to protect the body so God just allowed them to be much darker to survive in the different environments. Not because of evolution but because God loved us enough to allow us to survive in a broken world. And also God never said not to intermingle with other races He said other people meaning the pagans who had given into their foolish desires and worshiped false gods that they made with their own hands. I don’t know how you are doing since this post since it was a month ago but I just wanted to let you know that the 7 day genesis account are actual days not millennia because He said then evening passed and morning came marking the (fill in the blank 1-6) day people want to mix paganism into the Bible because it makes them comfortable but by doing so actually damage the gospel because if you can’t believe God’s word in the beginning you can’t in the end and that would also make God a liar in the New Testament when it says all sun came from Adam and that we all came from Adam. Not that we all came from people at the time of Adam but we all came from Adam.
@N/A that sounds like a pagan book and doctrines of demons. God said how He created everything and anything you add to that is not actually backed up by real science the earth isn’t millions of years old because our dating system is off. We had a rock they we (we meaning the human race) watched form it was 10 years old and we knew that for a fact, yet it was dated to millions of years old even though we watched it form in a volcano. The different layers in the rock don’t prove the theory of evolution either because the flood is what shoved the earth down and moved the different layers and killed the Dino’s and all the other creatures along with all the people alive at that time.
Models are so forgiving. Current "secular" population genetics focussed on the Y-chromosome, suggest a timeline that isn't Biblical, but have us descend from 4 males, roughly 50,000 years ago (with "bottle-neck events both before and after). So what does it take to change the 50,000 year timeline to one of 4,500 years? Initially you need "only" to tweak the mutation rate in your model. And as you already can predict what mutation rate you'll need to model a beginning at 4,500 years ago, the hunt is on. Nathaniel Jeanson finally finds his dataset and there's much rejoice at Answers in Genesis. We have used science to disprove science - "our data are as valid as that of the secular sciences". And at face value, that is correct if only temporarily: You have two data points - a mutation rate and a beginning date for diversification and yo draw ("model") a line and yipee! It fits. If only, cause it doesn't end there. You can (and should!) test your model with additional data, this time from archeological DNA samples, to validate your mutation rates and branching of populations into genetic haplotypes. And there, the model fails. "Something must be wrong with the sequence quality, so I left them out" Nathaniel Jeason explains in the video. But no, that's the wrong answer: The correct answer is that the archeological data shows your tweaked model is wrong. It has been falsified by the archaeological DNA sequences. The dots that should lie on the interpolated line of the tweaked model, doesn't fit. The model is wrong. And there's where the science ends for Answers in Genesis: Because Answers in Genesis only pays lip service to a secular scientific process, when it can be coaxed into agreeing with them. Answers in Genesis aren't looking for answers to questions. They already have the answers and those answers must not be questioned! So whenever scientific data does't support their 4,500 timeline since a Great Flood genetic bottle-neck, both data, science and scientific process is dismissed, wholesale! The difference between "real" secular science and the pseudoscience that Answers in Genesis here propagate is this: Science may create models and make predictions, based on data at hand. IF new data to test the model, doesn't fit the model, science learns from that. It is how secular science progresses! Science tries if modifications to the model will accommodate the new data - or whether an entirely new model is needed to explain the expanded dataset. The approach of Nathaniel Jeanson and Answers in Genesis is that if additional data doesn't fit the desired model (the only one allowed) then the data must be dismissed! But that is "faking it" - the very thing Answers in Genesis and Young Earth Creationists (unjustifiably) accuse the secular sciences of propagating. In above video, they openly admit it. And maybe they should just stop, there. And it is, of course, just the tip of the ice berg: Y-chromosome is one thing to study. Another is mitochondrial DNA. It is as useful in the studies of ancestry as is the Y-chromosome: the Y-chromosome cannot recombine and is inherited from father to son, altered only by mutations. Mitochondrial DNA is likewise inherited from our mothers, altered only by mutations. And looking at mitochondrial DNA shows that the genetic "Eve" - the common maternal ancestor - lies >100,000 years back. Further down the ice berg of problems: The genetic diversity of most mammals is substantially higher than that of humans. And this is of course a problem for Young Earth Creationists, as all living animals must descend from forefathers that all arose from the same genetic bottle-neck that Noah's Ark represents and it must have happened 4,500 years ago. So "we don't talk about that" at Answers in Genesis and among Young Earth Creationists. Why? Because, as I stated above - both only pays lip-service to scientific reasoning: They have answers that must not be questioned, rather than questions in search of answers. And that makes their approach not only non-scientific - it makes their approach anti-scientific! They try to fake an imitated scientific approach to use its resulting pseudo-science as a weapon in their war ON science.
Simcha Jacobavich did a documentary called Quest for the Lost Tribes in the eighties. Directly corresponds to your teaching. You may find one another close in biblioarcheology.
You'd think someone would've found one by now...all those elements have been around for billions of years, we have to be getting close to nature making one on its own right? 😂
Book of jubilees while not canon gives an idea of the allocation of land to the sons of Noah: Genealogy of the Descendants of Shem: Noah and his Sons divide the Earth (viii. 1-30; cf. Gen. x.). “And Noah rejoiced that this portion came forth for Shem and for his sons, and he remembered all that he had spoken with his mouth in prophecy; for he had said: Blessed be the Lord God of Shem, And may the Lord dwell in the dwelling of Shem." 7 [paragraph continues] 19. And he knew that the Garden of Eden is the holy of holies, and the dwelling of the Lord, and Mount Sinai the centre of the desert, and Mount Zion--the centre of the navel of the earth: these three 8 were created as holy places facing each other. 20. And he blessed the God of gods, who had put the word of the Lord into his mouth, and the Lord for evermore. 21. And he knew that a blessed portion p. 75 and a blessing had come to Shem and his sons unto the generations for ever--the whole land of Eden and the whole land of the Red Sea, and the whole land of the east, and India, and on the Red Sea and the mountains thereof, and all the land of Bashan, and all the land of Lebanon and the islands of Kaftûr, 1 and all the mountains of Sanîr 2 and ’Amânâ, 3 and the mountains of Asshur in the north, and all the land of Elam, Asshur, and Bâbêl, and Sûsân and Mâ‘ĕdâi 4 and all the mountains of Ararat, and all the region beyond the sea, which is beyond the mountains of Asshur towards the north, a blessed and spacious land, and all that is in it is very good.”
@Stephanie Bach : What do you mean that's not how it works? If I claim that any DNA "points" to another then I need to have both DNAs for a comparison.
Maybe there is going to be genetic evidence as to which of the 12 tribes an individual is from. This will identify what tribe you'll be in during the tribulation.
One thing I find interesting is that no one talks about the fact that Noah could have had children after the flood. According to scripture he lived about 300 years after the flood.
Religious fools frantically search for miracles and proof that their faith is a true historical event. Acknowledging that you have lived your whole life on a lie must feel like a defeat that is hard to bear.
@@somethingrandomyt8367 About that, but yes, we can accurately measure the degradation until it gets down to 1/2 or 1/4 percent. That's about 10 half-lifes or 50,000 years. Of course that was when I was in school learning about it. When did you study radiometric dating?
One thing I find very reasonable about this, is that the age of Earth and the physical universe is largely irrelevant here. Humans being young geologically speaking makes much more sense. Doesn't matter if the Earth is 10k or 10 billion years old.
Exactly. Scientists can't tell how old the earth really is for one. And even if they could, and found it to be very old. It wouldn't make a difference. God created Adam fully mature, so it's reasonable to think that God would have created the earth mature also. How scientists " think" that science is in conflict with God cracks me up. All science is is studying what God created. Nothing more. Evolution is a joke also. We find we need all of our organs to work together to live. The heart, the blood, the views for instance, all need to be there to function. Did we grope around blind in search of food? Did the esophagus evolve before the stomach? Funny how science shows everything is decaying away. Only humanity has evolved the opposite way, for the better. That to me is an insane world view. Atheism is simply that distant land in the parable of the lost son. That's all it is. People think they can hide from God by ignoring him and thinking if they don't believe, they won't have to face judgement. But that's so irrational
@@shimauma42 it is. His name is the way, the truth and THE life. Without him everything would fly apart. John 1 : 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not A N Y T H I N G made that was made. And it is impossible him to lie. Bible. Hebrews 6:13-18 [13]For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he sware by himself, [14]Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee. [15]And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise. [16]For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife. [17]Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath: [18]That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us: THEY say gravity holds us here. W R O N G ! HE holds all things together
Have you considered that the dispersion from the Tower of Babal was a dispersion not only tongues but also race. You can learn another language, but not another race. Race definitely keeps people apart.
I believe he tackled that on a series he did on this same channel about two years ago, and race simply boils down to culture and lineage, so language can therefore change culture, which may inherently change race if you move to a new area
Watch the video before this one, titled "What Makes a Race?" Probably the different families dispersed from Babel had slightly different characteristics. If, for example, two dark skinned parents left Babel with their children (mostly dark skinned) then they would have had very little DNA coding for light skin to pass on to their descendants. Of course there has been so much mixing before and since that the majority of people today are somewhere in the middle. What we call 'race' are merely superficial differences that exist on a spectrum. We are all members of the Human Race.
Could not be from race first, but the people who dispersed by language would take on the characteristics of the color of the majority of those peoples color, lighter would become lighter and darker become darker. And is the reason God does not judge according to color as the theory does, as in the theory the lighter you are the more intelligent you are.
"Y"? "Y" not? I believed in Evolution decades ago. In time, I changed. Then, it struck me: If God is God, He can do most anything (he can't lie. Better to say, He won't lie) So, the 6,300 or years from Creation to now, it is perfectly compatible with God. God is God, do not mock Him. Amen.
I downloaded a copy of your book and found it every bit a page-turner as any book I've read. I'm disappointed that all I hear is crickets when I look for secular response. You may be getting more of it than we are, but they seem to silenced.
Look harder. Plenty of geneticists have addressed Nathaniel Jeanson's 'work'. It's pseudoscience. Which is why he published a book, instead of publishing an article or paper in a relevant peer-reviewed science journal, which is how these things are done in the real world. Also, science is secular by definition, and if there were any validity to Jeanson's work, it would be big news in the world of science. It's an apologetics book, that's all it is. It may seem 'sciency' to lay persons, and Jeanson is a scientist, but his book is pseudoscience, unfortunately.
@@travisbicklepopsicle , you should challenge Nathaniel Jeanson to a debate! You seem fairly confident in your accusations and proclamations of his alleged "pseudoscience". You should put this all to rest!
@@raifcluster I wrote another long reply that is gone now for some reason. I'm not posting it again. In that comment, I mentioned a review by Creation Ministries International.. even a *creationist organization* is leery about his book.. Here's one from another scientist: 'JEANSON NT. Does' Y-chromosome Adam'Refute Genesis?. Institute for Creation Research. 2013. As you see, it was ‘published’ by a non-scientific, religious institution with a self-admitted non-evidence-based bias. Nobody peer-reviewed the work. It was never published in any peer-reviewed journal. Any reputable scientist who might have been asked to review the work wouldn’t have only had objections, they would have recommended it be deposited in the circular file where it belonged.' Ian H Lester, Phylogenetics, Mol Biol Sc Advanced, Australian National University. There are plenty more scientists out there who have already falsified Jeanson's work.. besides, geneticists and anthropologists figured out quite a while back that modern humans first arose in Africa around 200,000 years ago, and since Jeanson is working within a 6,000 or so year time frame, well.. Pseudoscience from a creationist author. That's all it is. 'You should challenge him to a debate" No, I shouldn't :-) What would that accomplish? This issue is not about a 'debate'. It isn't about who puts forth the best arguments, or who can 'win over' the listeners. It's about *science*, about data and evidence, not about debating..
@@rbelf001 In DNA comparisons between humans and animals, researchers have found that humans share more DNA with monkeys than they do with other mammals, but the actual percentages can be surprising. Whereas rhesus monkeys and humans share about 93 percent of their DNA, the Abyssinian house cat shares 90 percent of its DNA with humans. Mice and humans share, on average, about 85 percent of their DNA, which is one reason why mice are so useful for medical research.
@@jeffburton1326 Amazing mice share (as you claim about 85%) yet monkeys/apes share more than any other mammal cannot be used to grow and transplant organs like mice can with supposedly less DNA than those monkeys. This proves we are NOT related to Monkeys/apes else they would be perfect donors for humans and perfect for growing human organs for transplant. The fact they are not able to be used to grow human organs proves they are NO relation of humans thereby proving evolution a farce.
The human genome project has mapped the entire DNA of humans. It shows that humans share 98.7% DNA with Bonobos and Chimps. So we have a common ancestor.
E1b1a only being a few hundred years old? What of E1b1a found in MOTA and Rameses III? We done believe in carbons dating or all the other dating techniques used in the analysis of Ancient DNA that precedes 6000 years?
@@demetriusbooker5760 -E1b1c is the OLD nomenclature. - E1b1a is the new name that is the equivalent of E-V38/v100. - E1b1a or V38 Unites Horn African E-329 (Mota) with the more West African centered E-M2. Thus m329 carriers in the East AND E-M2 carriers in the West (And Rameses) were E1b1a positive. -The oldest E lineages have not been found in Natufian. They were found in 15 thousand year old North West Africans of the Iberomarusian cultural complex. These are 1000s of years older than Natufian.
When you are "positive" for anything under E1b1a then you are positive for E1b1a. I am E1b1a1b1a1g1a. This means I am also E1b1a. I have Ethiopia family who are positive E1b1a(v38) becssue they carry the E-M329 mutation that comes FROM E1b1a/V38.
The fossil layers could have been formed quickly? And why is all kind of modern animals missing in the fossils? And why are the findings in the fossils always in a specific order, not determined by size??? 16:55
Specifically we are not Jewish we are Judean. And we were long time associated and mixed with Ham-Noah prophesied Yaphet would dwell in our tents eventually. And being Shem does not guarantee you are Ysrael. You could easily be of Esau or Elamites who lived up north in Eurasia, Arphaxad, etc.
@Zihan Nan Chinese come from Sinites who descend from Canaan, a son of Ham.(Genesis 10:17) Sino is a prefix used to denote China. Sinim in Hebrew refers to China. Also there is genetics , East Asians do not have Semitic DNA. The book of Jubilees gives an allocation of Shem’s Territory-encompassing the garden of Eden, from Israel/Lebanon to the whole of middle-east(west Asia), Iran and whole of India.
Thank you Jesus and thank you Nathaniel Jeanson and Ken Ham for making these videos.
Adam and Eve are our grandparents. We are one human race with just different colors but from the same grandparents. Love one another.
Mate its got Nothing to do with colour We are all the same It had to stop by this thing by judging from the out side we are One 👍💗👪😀🌴🌴🍀🌹
Isn't the story of Adam and eve about incest? Pretty gross...🤢🤮
I like to say we’re all cousins. Just this evening my husband and I were at a dig and I looked at the dirt and it was so beautiful. I asked my husband “ what did God make Adam from?” “Dirt” he responds. I smiled and said “Look at the soil, see the variation of colours. One for every shade of skin of the human race. We’re all in there. Every variation of skin colour all wrapped up in the dirt that Adam was made from. Praise the Lord.”
@@celiajones-connor6289
😂😂😂 you can't be serious.
My oldest kids went to school in a small town in S. France. When the teacher (who was a communist) tried to teach evolution, my oldest daughter forcefully asked, "Do you believe this? Do you know for a fact that this is true?" The teacher backed off and changed her approach to, "Some people believe ..." Later that year we met with the teacher and she told us, "When I see your kids and think about your family, it makes me think about God."
How the teacher is 🦒 she is a supernaturally smart person because of how she responds 🐿
Not judgmental but understanding, wise, discerning, nice, respectful, and godly 🦫
If I ever see this person in real life 🌳 I would like her! 🐈⬛
What a beautiful testament, from the mouths of babes, causing even the most unlikely of persons to consider the existence of our heavenly Father.!!
Hallelujah and Amen.!!
@Truth Content Adam is a combination of all the races put together.🙏💪❤️
@@kateescarlet9693well God made everything. So, pretty sure He’s already won. Truth is truth no matter what.
@@kateescarlet9693 Sorry, but your "scorecard" is quite outdated.
Ken Ham and his team were the start of my journey to giving my life to the Lord. I am eternally thankful to Ken .
Wow god bless! 🐁
I went to public schools in Sydney growing up and I remember being taught Evolution during primary school and was very confused as to where the apes that we evolved from came from and I remember saying to my teacher, ‘we came from Adam & Eve, they were people not apes!’ And she said, the cavemen came first which confused me and other students
Then in high school, during science, teacher tried to explain the BigBang theory and my classroom rebelled calling out, ‘No! God created the world!” Teacher threw his hands up in the air because we all insisted and saying, this is lies Sir!
Gone are those days, now everyone believes the lie. So thankful that creationist are standing up now, bringing back the truth.
Awesome! You're the first person I've come across that tells a similar story as the one I have told on several occasions. My Jr. High science class teacher was taping a 4 or 5 ft long poster of the ascent of man above the chalkboard, and I told him the same thing. "We are not apes, sir, we're people! We're children of God! And besides, don't you think you should wait until you find the missing link? Because the ones you guys are using have been exposed as frauds!..."
He really did not like having a scrawny kid telling him his "theory" was floundering. And here we are over 45 years later and the best they have is a string of debunked missing links that they relentlessly parade around as if there isn't a flaw in them! Lucy has been proven to be a chimpanzee for years, now, and the scientist's assertions about all the missing parts resembling humans have been fully dismissed by examining the many specimens of the same species found since Lucy was found! The chimp's fingers are curved, the feet are chimp feet, the hip is a chimp hip, the head is a chimp head, etc! If we were to place Lucy's fully articulated and intact skeleton (as she was when she was alive) right next to a fully articulated and intact human specimen there would be absolutely no question! Lucy's a chimp and we are not!!
But apparently, evolutionists have simply resolved themselves to lying whenever it's necessary. Mostly, to themselves, unfortunately!
Otherwise, we wouldn't have the Albatros of evolution hanging around the neck of scientific progress and education!
@@lederereddy Exactly! It starts with atheist scientists, then teachers are told to teach lies to us but some of us and children of today truly can’t see the logic. I have a Christian friend who was a school teacher and she believes Lucy is legitimate, I also told her there’s no missing link, she is adamant that they’ve found it, she’s seen it! I told her, it’s rubber! Still she believes in evolution and the Bible
The brainwashing runs deep! But not for you and me! ‘high five!’ You’re too smart! ✝️
@@lisaseverino5114 --- " I have a Christian friend who was a school teacher and she believes Lucy is legitimate"
It is TRAGIC to see how schools have undermined the student's ability to be objective. The curriculum is deliberately designed to instill subjective secular biases as deeply as possible. And your friend has succumbed to the literal bombardment of evolutionary dogma, probably based on the simple fact that she can't imagine so many intelligent people could possibly be wrong. And, obviously, she doesn't believe the bible is really God's word even if she says she does.
A quick study of the laws of logic and the scientific method would affirm the fact that objectivity (existential physical evidence) is the road to unbiased truth. But secularists' unwritten laws such as "all scientific inquiries into nature must be answered by naturalistic causes!"
Or "During the observation of biologists into the intricacies of biological organisms, the biologist must constantly remind themselves that the designs they're seeing were not intentional even if they look intentional!"
That is the definition of forsaking the objectivity of laws of logic and science and being led astray by the subjectiveness of personal bias!
God help us, but these fundamental truths have been eroded so badly that people really don't understand how to separate the truth from lies, anymore. We must lovingly remind whoever will listen! And, yes! High-five each other for standing strong on God's infallible Word!
Aloha and God bless! I will pray for you and your friend!
@@lederereddy I love what you said, you are spot on as my friend doesn’t believe the story of Adam & Eve. My friend is highly intelligent but truly doesn’t believe but believes in millions of years ago.
I did so poorly at school and was terribly raised so I’ve always had to cling to God.
Not too many people believe me but I’ve had 2 visions and I’ve had many spiritual encounters with Jesus and angels and no, I do not take drugs.
Jesus told me about fake news was coming back in 2007 how Satan will use every screen to hypnotise the young and that He God is seperating sheep from goats- the end of the age.
He said it will get really bad, then he’ll fix it! He’s using Ken Ham.
And so it is... the "big bang" and "evil~lucien" both part of the grand delusion. See how it will all come together, along with "aliens" and the "ufo" paradigm, to steer as many people away from the truth as is possible... so much so, that even the elect would be deceived if it were possible.!!
Be not deceived. Not by the fallen angels, not by man, not by demons claiming to be what they are not.
Be not deceived. The bible tells us the truth of all things that we are able to comprehend. And, while there are still mysteries, accept that we are not to know all things.
Be not deceived. Coming is the greatest of lies, meant to diminish the truth, destroy faith, deny Christ Jesus and attempt to make a liar of our heavenly Father...believe it not.!!
Again and again, the scriptures warnings hold that we be not deceived. He who called out the end at the beginning, loved us enough to issue warnings of what would happen, told us of the signs to watch for, and reminded us that all things are possible but ONLY through him.
May our heavenly Father bless and keep his own, strengthening us for what is yet to come and instilling the peace that passes all understanding... in Jesus mighty name.
Dr. Nathanial Jeanson is the most important scientist in modern history. The conclusions reached in this scientific study are not hard to see or accept by anyone with a mind open to truth. May this help to bring many, many of these people to God thru our saviour Yeshua (Jesus).
These 2 verses are proven true by the work of Dr Jeanson 🙌 👌 make a tree good and it's fruit will be good.
Bible. Matthew 10:26
[26]Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.
Bible. Matthew 13:9
[9]Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
@@alanmcnaughton3628 Amen! Praise the Lord!
@@timothyyoung4463 to think Daniel saw this from the captivity in Babylon
Bible. Daniel 12:1-4,7
[1]And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
[2]And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
[3]And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.
[4]But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
[7]And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished.
@@kateescarlet9693 but where are you in all of this...this seeking for the truth of things. You know...the important things like where did we come from? Why are we here? What is our purpose? Who knows the truth? ....The one who values it above money, gold, diamonds, power, etc.
'The most important scientist in modern history'
Are the rest of the world's scientists aware of this fact?
The most important scientists, actually, all scientists, publish their work in relevant peer reviewed journals.
They don't publish pseudo-scientific apologetics books.
Hallelujah!!! Glory to God! Dr. Jeanson Thank you for your work!
I love Ken Hamm I first found his videos at a Homeschool convention in Wichita KS Approximately 25 years ago and I was fascinated! I still am at this scientific evidence that overwhelmingly supports the Bible and God's creation.
There is a sweetness to the integrity and earnestness of these folks. They don’t quite have the science down too well - but we could do worse than listen to their underlying philosophy.
My only recommendation is that they trust their faith more than they do … if genesis began 14 billion years ago with the Big Bang - how is that less awesome than a quaint imagined account in the Bible citing 6,000 years ago. 11:45 How is that any less the hand of something profoundly magnificent - call it natural law or God. How is it not the hand of an immensity beyond all understanding.
This is not lost if we learn now that it wasn’t six days of creation 6,000 years ago.
It may not be a personal God - but do we know that one way or another?
Room for faith there don’t you think?
I am amazed. I don’t see a reason to laugh at these folks or for them to condemn me for having somewhat different takes on something astoundingly profound.
When young people going to college or university have to sit exams and to give answers that are in the 'science' text books but that they know to be absolutely wrong, they must give the wrong answer to pass the exam, or they will fail and/or be considered revolutionist! This is some battle that 'we' are in! I am grateful for the amazing work you have done and now we have an ultimately powerful and provable physical link to our Creator, thus prooving the all importsnt Spiritual link. The unbreakable link.
Change can only happen from the top down.
@@alansegger6199 But, a sea of people can move mountains!
and you can't figure out why your pseudo science isn't taught. 🙄
60 souls saved at our fair booth this year/week! Praise the Lord!
All praise and glory to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 🙏 King of Kings and Lord of Lords 🔥
It is not about judging people on their outsides. It is about judging people' s behaviour in general
doesn't your god tell you not to judge? 🙄
I always had questions as a child into adulthood.
This is wonderful and validates everything I felt and explored. Your linguist you need to contact is Dr Nehemia Gordon. The discoverer and validated the Hebrew Book of Matthew. Dead Seas Scrolls Scholar and Awesome Person!!!!
Dr. Gordon is da bomb ❤ Keith Johnson and Torah Pearls are also da bomb ❤ I came across Dr. G through A Rood Awakening a few years ago, and he was giving a talk near me so I went. He's the nicest man, came out and shook my hand, said welcome to my talk
One Race, One Book, One Way
ha, no.
Ken hams opening statement got this video a like. I'm sure Dr Nathankel will produce another phenomenal video so
He is literally proving the Bible and still he says if the Bible is correct. Of course it is correct praise God and I thank him for these men for proving this for others to turn to him for salvation.
Parise god who? Brian dont you know the mad ethnic cleansing gods names tut tut
When was the first creation myth in bible no not Adam
The book is a must.
I love this channel. Answers in Genesis has been a real eye opener for me. Thank you for everything y'all have been doing. God bless you.
Best you read it again its a mess moses wrote it and we know all about that evil man
God bless you too 🐁
@@ashwayn What??
@@ashwayn Lol, like you even know who Moses is.
@@timothyyoung4463 Moses is another fictional character of religious mythology
Thank you! Wonderful job in your pursuit of details of the DNA evidence and generating an increasing mou tain of evidence the truth of the Biblical history! A worldview shattering result, Hallelujah!
“Haplogroup E and DE have an Middle Eastern origin (per Cabrera et al. 2018[1]). Haplogroup E migrated into Africa as part of a massive migration of "Basal-Eurasians" (Ancestral West-Eurasians) and than diffused and diversified within Africa, specifically the Horn of Africa (Northeast Africa). Haplogroup DE, next to CF, were the Basal-Eurasian lineages which expanded from the Middle East. The common ancestral lineage ("YDNA Adam") is suggested to have originated somewhere in the Middle East or the Iranian Plateau (per Arnason et al. 2020”
Keep up the great work and be encouraged! We greatly appreciate what you are doing.
Some scripture to remember...
A scoffer seeks wisdom and finds none, But knowledge is easy to one who has understanding.
Also...
Anyone who rebukes a mocker will get an insult in return. Anyone who corrects the wicked will get hurt. So don't bother correcting mockers; they will only hate you. But correct the wise, and they will love you.
I personally think that any comments that involve mocking, even those that seem "for" you, just pass right over them and focus on the people with genuine concerns. That should save you a lot of wasted effort.
May He continue to bless your work.
@rog er great comment!
Good advice although sometimes I can't help myself,
It can be a chance to leave a bible verse or passage.
I have been watching Dr Jeanson for about a year and a half.
The clock in our DNA sure beats the isochron dating method that dates nothing with any accuracy.
These chunks of our real history are provable and back up the timeline of the bible.
Great work.
@perfectblindguy That wouldn't surprise me. But Jesus (who we believe is the same God) also refused to throw a stone when the adulterer was brought before Him. Why do you think that is?
Why the vastly different reaction to basically the same sin?
There is an answer by the way. And it's a GOOD one.
You can literally see the root word “genes” in it “Genesis”
That should hit you like a ton of bricks. It’s not a mythology it’s based in bio chemistry which is why God took a rib when he wanted to clone a female from Adam. The human rib contains specific genetic material not found anywhere else the body
This hits differently
@@samuelerighawilliams yes sir it truly does boggle the mind. Even if God wasn’t the first bio chemist ever, how would a Hebrew rabbi, in this case Moses cause that’s who wrote genesis right, how would someone who has no knowledge of bio chemistry because it’s fricken 2000 BC lol be able to concoct something that’s objectively true thousands of years later? “Oh wanna clone a human? No problem let’s start at the ribs”
How would people that are making things up know to choose the rib versus literally any other human bone? Now the question being presented is more annoying than the one “is it God or science?”
My mind is made up I know that much.
This blows my mind
Wait like what? What do you mean it has specific genetic material not found anywhere else? Can you verify this with a reliable source?
Isn't the story of Adam and eve about incest? Pretty gross...🤢🤮
One of the main reasons that a smaller number of Creation scientists can do a better job at proving our theories is that it’s all common sense science. In other words, even though God’s Creation is complicated, He has provided common sense ways of proving our existence.
yeah, because thinking is hard 🙄
@@cliftongaither6642 - 2 Peter 3:3-7
“Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming ? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation.”
“For they are willfully ignorant that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water.”
“But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.”
God bless you more than more
The Gospel according to John, I am.pleased to engage! The BiblicalNarrative is stood on Solidly!🌝🙋🏽♀️💜💯🕊
P
00000000000000p
Amen! Thank you Brothers!!!
Thanks for the information. GOD bless you
Remember all wisdom outside of the fear of God is not true wisdom because the Word of God clearly says the Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom
Ken Ham is an amazing man. He’s scientific literate and I love that
He doesn’t understand (or intentionally ignores) data that he can’t see but believes in a deity that you can’t see designing everything lol he is not scientifically literate
God bless Ken Ham 🐆
God is rescuing all animals and turn this world into a vegetable consuming world only 🍁
Isaiah 11:7
KJV Genesis 2:4 These are the generations
of the heavens and of the earth when they were created,
In the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,
and verse 5!
What a wonderful story! Wonderful, Marvelous Report!
The beginning of the discussion explains faith, the man says he gets choked up hearing that information. It takes intense emotional reactions to bond with the idea that people have an emotional crutch to lean on in religion, without these overblown feminine reactions you do not get the same result.
You guys need to try and get on Joe Rogan's podcast. He just might hear you out. Huge audience.
Doubt it. Joe is actually pretty close-minded when it comes to Christianity and Judaism.
Joe is a committed evolutionist. Only has people who will repeat the kind of things he whats he wants to hear.
@@matthewaislabie7354 not exactly true...he has people of all different views on there. Sometimes he agrees, sometimes he argues...I doubt he'd change his mind on this though. People think it's too kooky regardless of how much evidence you put right in front of their face.
There must be something wrong with this gentleman's argument. We have ice cores that go back 800,000 years. You can count the winters. I suspect a non biblical geneticist would not agree with him.
Joe Rogan???? That guy is a dunce🤣🤣🤣
The Genesis Flood is an incredible volume... well reasoned and plenty of science to back it up!
What fields of science demonstrate there was a global flood? Certainly not geology.
( or biology and all its subfields, genetics, paleontology, Anthropology, etc.)
Archaeology..
There are thousands upon thousands of peer-reviewed articles and papers published in relevant science journals; not a single one has ever demonstrated Global flood.
Wondering where you got your information from. Science most definitely does not support any Global flood.
19:31 A massive hole in the evolution lie is that everything before Mankind took millions of years to evolve (dinosaurs), but Humans evolved from full on monkies in just a short 200k years? It's inconsistent with their already wacky and wild theory.
The theory is that we share a common ancestor with apes, not that we are directly descended from them...but I get what you're saying
TRUTH! God's holy word is the Truth, and Jesus Christ is the Truth incarnate! Oh how I love Jesus, because he first loved and gave Himself for me! His name is called Faithful and True(Rev 19:11, John 14:6) and He is soon coming to reclaim earth"s title deed!
Fascinating topic! I would like it even more if the episodes were longer and more indepth.
Check the older videos. I feel like they did 30 episodes lol
I would also add that they would like you to buy the book for the more in depth studies.
@@CathyAFarr Yes, I know. However, it would be nice to have more to listen to as I go about my day.
@@padillas4357 - True, however you could purchase the audio book…just an idea.
@@CathyAFarr When it becomes "Buy this, and buy that", then it becomes a business instead of a ministry. I hope AIG does not go the way of "merchandising". It is always disappointing when presentations turn into infomercials.
The main point of my original comment is that they don't have to worry bout the length or depth of their presentations. The topic is so interesting that I can listen for hours, and I know others who feel the same.
One Lord, one faith, one baptism… is what the word of God says…
MELANIN! SOME HAVE A LITTLE, SOME HAVE A LOT! ALMIGHTY GOD MAKES VERY SIMPLE!🌝🙋🏽♀️💜💯🕊
Is the chart in the book please?
Yes it is I have a copy.
@@alansegger6199 thankyou
When, did one time believers sell themselves to evilution, no one born again can ever turn away from the written word that is so easily understood, when you search for God with your whole heart. A divided heart will never stand in Gods grace, because it becomes a kingdom divided against itself. I have heard that pastors, when someone come to preach the 6000 yr old existence of the earth are told not to say it ,or to water it down, to maybe or it could have happened. Judgement is beginning in the church, to find out just who the church is. As for my family as many others we have left the people called the church because we became to uncomfortable with their teaching and actions.
That’s right, when you know the lord, you just know that the Bible tells the truth and science is about to find out, too. Like it’s said in the Bible, they all will know the lord in the end times, everyone in the world will, so I think it’s about to happen right now.🙏
This is all fascinating. Have your results been peer reviewed by other experts , and have these been published in any professional academic science journals?
The peer reviews by “ other experts”…..the same ones that admit to just peer reviewing for their colleague friends to help them get published? Sorry, peer reviews have become untrustworthy. Look at the data, retest it, retest it again. Genetics don’t lie.
Of course not.. otherwise he would have won a Nobel prize
they would have to admit God is real... creation is not the 'big bang'....they already know this... but will never admit it... this is more for the lay-person, believer and non-believer to show how the bible is true..
@@ruthfreeman864 That’s not how science works. It’s very telling that Dr. Jeanson has neither a degree in these topics nor has he published any articles for peer review.
We should just take his word for it? Not how science works
@@CaptainFantastic222 I understand where you’re coming from but I wonder why Dr Jeanson’s work is not reviewed regardless? Why must someone have a specific degree, can’t anyone use science and it’s methods to discover something so why wouldn’t scientists look at this work?
My son had a talent show at school and they told him he could not sing a Christian song I called the principle and explained to him the legal implications of religious discrimination and he allowed my son to sing his Christian song.
Quoted from the above text intro to the video: "...it’s only possible because the researcher, Harvard-trained Dr. Jeanson, starts with the history and the timeline God has given us in his Word."
That is the problem. If you start from a premise which you are not allowed to question, you are not doing science, you are doing religion. And just by the by, there is no timeline in the Christian bible. The timeline is inferred by adding up the generations as given in the bible, which may, or may not, be correct. But there is another little devil in the details. There is a mitochondrial Eve, and a Y chromosome Adam which all humns on earth can trace themselves back to. But they weren't the only humans alive at the time. One can easily understand this by just counting back your own lineage. You had 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great-grandparents, 16 great-great grandparents, etc. If we take 25 years as being a generation, and divide 4000 years (since the flood), we get 160 generations. With a doubling of grandparents every generation, that gives us 2 the power of 160. Here's what we get: 1,461,501.637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976.
That's a lot of grandparents. That is many more times than all the people that have every lived. Obviously there is something not quite right. The best explanation is given in "River Out Of Eden", by Richard Dawkins. But basically it is this. Not all lineages have offspring. If we go back far enough, we can find the one man, or one woman who were the parents of all existing humans, but...and this is the important but...they were not the only humans alive at the time. It's just that all other lineages died out over the years. The date when modern humans first appeared is widely debated, but is anywhere from 200,000 - 320,000 years ago. Other hominid species existed long before that. The earlest human species (homo habilis) lived between 1.5 - 2.5 million years ago.
Your problem is 25 yrs as a generation. A generation in the bible was the average lifespan of a person and not the ability a of child bearing age. Thus a generation was between 70-80 years in the bible. 13 generations multiplied by 70-80 = 910-1040 BC which was most likely the time of the Babylonian captivity of the Jews. The bible always speaks the truth more than the modern generation does that we find ourselves in today. People get stupider and stupider every generation that goes by.
The evolutionists harden their hearts as god reveals the truth to them through you.
I look at it like this. God told us what he wanted us to know. We do not need to know how the cake is made not the details of how it’s made. Take it on faith or don’t!
Isn't the story of Adam and eve about incest? Pretty gross...🤢🤮
Watching from Zambia. learning a lot on this channel.
Very cool. I’ll be buying a copy.
we walk by faith not by sight.
Hi Dr.Jeanson, I think it would be very interesting for You to read the book of Jubilees
Good book
What do you think that will change?
Awesome! Thank you!
So this dna sequence that keeps been shown. Where can I view it or buy exactly please. Is there a direct link?
I love these topics relating science and tradition... I would appreciate a throough analysis of this book even by atheists... atheists of goodwil... not the militant haters... the men of goodwill
One problem I perceive with the timing theory is that there are male and female generations. Women tend to breed at an earlier age than men. In history, it may be correct to suggest that men tend to produce their first child at age 25. I would suggest that taking into account history beyond the modern period, 20 would be a better estimate for average earliest breeding age, and for women it would be around 15 or 16 so generations of mtDNA would be approximately 6 per century, whereas for men it would be , let's say 4-5 generations per century. This would accelerate the rates of chromosomal/mtDNA change. It would be good to know whether these variations had any effect on the chronology of the human family tree or whether the 6000 years for mtDNA and 4500 years for Y chromosomal DNA hold up with variations like this. I also wonder if the timing for a generation is better calculated as average age of the parent at birth of the child, rather than first child. Again, female generations will be shorter, as men can continue to breed well beyond youth and into old age, whereas female fertility diminishes rapidly as they progress into middle age. What effect might these factors have on the proposed chronology?
I would love to see Mr. Ham build a “Tower of Babel” near the Ark and have the history of people shown as outlined in the book “Traced”. That would be a great learning tool and help us all to understand how close we all are to each other.
Thank you for the information. I have been looking for a book about this info for a while now. Bought the book.
This is amazing
Is anyone doing this tracing in the animal kingdom? We can guess that all land animals should be tracing their lineage back to their ancestors that came off the ark. Ocean mammals could probably trace their lineage back to the original day of creation of the sea animals.
Daaaaaaaang I didn't even think of that!
Thankyou
Love it!!!
In order to really understand this I would like to see the discoveries in "Traced" aligned with the major archeological sites on the Planet.
You can’t. The Bible says that the earth is old. This person just doesn’t know the Bible just as most Christian’s don’t. In the Old Testament God talked many times that we were not to intermingle with the different races and explains why. Why is it that people will not study their Bible and in particular the Old Testament. The Bible is about a family. The ethnic races are mentioned when we cross paths only. And no we did not come from one man and woman. A Caucasian cannot have a black baby or a Chinese baby. If he were right then we would be able to. So silly.
@@tomjackson3411 I assume this all comes from Genesis? Do you have some chapters/versus, please? - This sounds really interesting.
@@tomjackson3411 sorry to burst that "black v white skin pigmentation myth you have been ascribed to, BUT some tears ago creation magazine ran an article about an English couple who had twin babies, may have even been identical twins if memory serves correctly.
One was very dark skinned, the other white by comparison.
Adam and Eve had the fullness of the jeanpool, including the so called races that are variations in melatonin in that part of our DNA.
Science is observable, and this couple would not have even imagined they would have twins let alone with two very different skin colours.
@@NilodeRoock don’t fall victim to their lies please, the Bible never once says the earth is old and evolution and God don’t mix because adding paganism to the Bible never works. The reason we have other “races” which are still the human race which is why that term has always confused me is because the different people adapted to different environments over time (not millions of years) but a few generations because if you are outside in the heat all the time and it’s a very dry place then you are going to end up being darker skinned like when people tan you tan to protect the body so God just allowed them to be much darker to survive in the different environments. Not because of evolution but because God loved us enough to allow us to survive in a broken world. And also God never said not to intermingle with other races He said other people meaning the pagans who had given into their foolish desires and worshiped false gods that they made with their own hands. I don’t know how you are doing since this post since it was a month ago but I just wanted to let you know that the 7 day genesis account are actual days not millennia because He said then evening passed and morning came marking the (fill in the blank 1-6) day people want to mix paganism into the Bible because it makes them comfortable but by doing so actually damage the gospel because if you can’t believe God’s word in the beginning you can’t in the end and that would also make God a liar in the New Testament when it says all sun came from Adam and that we all came from Adam. Not that we all came from people at the time of Adam but we all came from Adam.
@N/A that sounds like a pagan book and doctrines of demons. God said how He created everything and anything you add to that is not actually backed up by real science the earth isn’t millions of years old because our dating system is off. We had a rock they we (we meaning the human race) watched form it was 10 years old and we knew that for a fact, yet it was dated to millions of years old even though we watched it form in a volcano. The different layers in the rock don’t prove the theory of evolution either because the flood is what shoved the earth down and moved the different layers and killed the Dino’s and all the other creatures along with all the people alive at that time.
Interesting, but would be better as a conversation.
Models are so forgiving. Current "secular" population genetics focussed on the Y-chromosome, suggest a timeline that isn't Biblical, but have us descend from 4 males, roughly 50,000 years ago (with "bottle-neck events both before and after).
So what does it take to change the 50,000 year timeline to one of 4,500 years? Initially you need "only" to tweak the mutation rate in your model.
And as you already can predict what mutation rate you'll need to model a beginning at 4,500 years ago, the hunt is on.
Nathaniel Jeanson finally finds his dataset and there's much rejoice at Answers in Genesis. We have used science to disprove science - "our data are as valid as that of the secular sciences".
And at face value, that is correct if only temporarily: You have two data points - a mutation rate and a beginning date for diversification and yo draw ("model") a line and yipee! It fits.
If only, cause it doesn't end there.
You can (and should!) test your model with additional data, this time from archeological DNA samples, to validate your mutation rates and branching of populations into genetic haplotypes.
And there, the model fails.
"Something must be wrong with the sequence quality, so I left them out" Nathaniel Jeason explains in the video.
But no, that's the wrong answer: The correct answer is that the archeological data shows your tweaked model is wrong. It has been falsified by the archaeological DNA sequences. The dots that should lie on the interpolated line of the tweaked model, doesn't fit. The model is wrong.
And there's where the science ends for Answers in Genesis:
Because Answers in Genesis only pays lip service to a secular scientific process, when it can be coaxed into agreeing with them.
Answers in Genesis aren't looking for answers to questions.
They already have the answers and those answers must not be questioned!
So whenever scientific data does't support their 4,500 timeline since a Great Flood genetic bottle-neck, both data, science and scientific process is dismissed, wholesale!
The difference between "real" secular science and the pseudoscience that Answers in Genesis here propagate is this:
Science may create models and make predictions, based on data at hand. IF new data to test the model, doesn't fit the model, science learns from that. It is how secular science progresses! Science tries if modifications to the model will accommodate the new data - or whether an entirely new model is needed to explain the expanded dataset.
The approach of Nathaniel Jeanson and Answers in Genesis is that if additional data doesn't fit the desired model (the only one allowed) then the data must be dismissed! But that is "faking it" - the very thing Answers in Genesis and Young Earth Creationists (unjustifiably) accuse the secular sciences of propagating.
In above video, they openly admit it. And maybe they should just stop, there.
And it is, of course, just the tip of the ice berg: Y-chromosome is one thing to study. Another is mitochondrial DNA. It is as useful in the studies of ancestry as is the Y-chromosome: the Y-chromosome cannot recombine and is inherited from father to son, altered only by mutations. Mitochondrial DNA is likewise inherited from our mothers, altered only by mutations.
And looking at mitochondrial DNA shows that the genetic "Eve" - the common maternal ancestor - lies >100,000 years back.
Further down the ice berg of problems: The genetic diversity of most mammals is substantially higher than that of humans. And this is of course a problem for Young Earth Creationists, as all living animals must descend from forefathers that all arose from the same genetic bottle-neck that Noah's Ark represents and it must have happened 4,500 years ago.
So "we don't talk about that" at Answers in Genesis and among Young Earth Creationists.
Why? Because, as I stated above - both only pays lip-service to scientific reasoning: They have answers that must not be questioned, rather than questions in search of answers.
And that makes their approach not only non-scientific - it makes their approach anti-scientific! They try to fake an imitated scientific approach to use its resulting pseudo-science as a weapon in their war ON science.
Great video. I would like to contact Dr. Jeanson. How do I go about this please?
Hello! If you are interested in contacting one of our scientists please follow the link.
answersingenesis.org/forms/inquiries/
Thank you! - Moderator
@answersingenesis isn't the story of Adam and eve about incest? Pretty gross...🤢🤮
Amazing
Does this Biblical account also include the indigenous tribes int he Amazon basin and some yet to be contacted?
Simcha Jacobavich did a documentary called Quest for the Lost Tribes in the eighties. Directly corresponds to your teaching. You may find one another close in biblioarcheology.
Is this a private company this dna test is done through? Not like the ones you see advertise on TV that will sell or give away your information?
I think you could have it done through the company DNA Consultants or the Crio company. DNA Consultants will not share your data.
So does this mean that I cannot find a solid gold diamond layered Rolex on the ground made by nature?
You'd think someone would've found one by now...all those elements have been around for billions of years, we have to be getting close to nature making one on its own right? 😂
Book of jubilees while not canon gives an idea of the allocation of land to the sons of Noah:
Genealogy of the Descendants of Shem: Noah and his Sons divide the Earth (viii. 1-30; cf. Gen. x.).
“And Noah rejoiced that this portion came forth for Shem and for his sons, and he remembered all that he had spoken with his mouth in prophecy; for he had said:
Blessed be the Lord God of Shem,
And may the Lord dwell in the dwelling of Shem." 7
[paragraph continues] 19. And he knew that the Garden of Eden is the holy of holies, and the dwelling of the Lord, and Mount Sinai the centre of the desert, and Mount Zion--the centre of the navel of the earth: these three 8 were created as holy places facing each other. 20. And he blessed the God of gods, who had put the word of the Lord into his mouth, and the Lord for evermore. 21. And he knew that a blessed portion
p. 75
and a blessing had come to Shem and his sons unto the generations for ever--the whole land of Eden and the whole land of the Red Sea, and the whole land of the east, and India, and on the Red Sea and the mountains thereof, and all the land of Bashan, and all the land of Lebanon and the islands of Kaftûr, 1 and all the mountains of Sanîr 2 and ’Amânâ, 3 and the mountains of Asshur in the north, and all the land of Elam, Asshur, and Bâbêl, and Sûsân and Mâ‘ĕdâi 4 and all the mountains of Ararat, and all the region beyond the sea, which is beyond the mountains of Asshur towards the north, a blessed and spacious land, and all that is in it is very good.”
Hmm...I need to look into why that book isn't canon
@Stephanie Bach : What do you mean that's not how it works? If I claim that any DNA "points" to another then I need to have both DNAs for a comparison.
In the end all will be used for scientific advancement. When the opportunity arises.
@@brendawilliams8062 Huh ? ? ? ?
How can you not study DNA without in the end scientific peer review?
I gotta real question tho if the earth and universe is six thousand years old why do 13000 year old civilizations being discovered
24.28 where is that link ? i have been to that page and there is no click on link ?????
There is not even a link to it in the description ??
Maybe there is going to be genetic evidence as to which of the 12 tribes an individual is from.
This will identify what tribe you'll be in during the tribulation.
One thing I find interesting is that no one talks about the fact that Noah could have had children after the flood. According to scripture he lived about 300 years after the flood.
Why is AIG allowing a comments section on RUclips? Does Ken Ham know about this?
Can't have comments!! Someone may point out Jeasons astounding errors in his book.
Honest scientists have dismantled his propositions completely.
@@matthiasbrandt1252 Ok, name some errors.
I read that in statistics that 1 over 2 to the 50th power, shows the event is not random....
May I know if "Answers in Genesis" could confirm Genesis 6:4 refers to hybrid angel-human race or purely human race. Tks.
The poeple of the lamba tribe in Africa were always sure they are a lost tribe of the Israelites. And then they found out by DNA tests, it’s true!🙏
Religious fools frantically search for miracles and proof that their faith is a true historical event.
Acknowledging that you have lived your whole life on a lie must feel like a defeat that is hard to bear.
what is the truth about carbon dating? human bones have been dated to 30,000bc. is that true?
That couldn't even be possible in the science sense because carbon 14 has a half life of 5000 years
@@somethingrandomyt8367
About that, but yes, we can accurately measure the degradation until it gets down to 1/2 or 1/4 percent.
That's about 10 half-lifes or 50,000 years.
Of course that was when I was in school learning about it.
When did you study radiometric dating?
@E.J.Crunkleton yea 3 months ago, I was a Yong earth creationistist. I'm not anymore, thank god
Been about 3 weeks since I ordered, your book. I expected to have received it by now. 💞🙏
Which DNA company do you suggest?
Any company will do. They all sell your information. The church gotta hustle for the big man upstairs!
One thing I find very reasonable about this, is that the age of Earth and the physical universe is largely irrelevant here. Humans being young geologically speaking makes much more sense. Doesn't matter if the Earth is 10k or 10 billion years old.
it matters if I am using the Bible as a foundation of the Gospel. God created the planet five days before creating the first man. this is Truth
Exactly. Scientists can't tell how old the earth really is for one. And even if they could, and found it to be very old. It wouldn't make a difference. God created Adam fully mature, so it's reasonable to think that God would have created the earth mature also. How scientists " think" that science is in conflict with God cracks me up. All science is is studying what God created. Nothing more. Evolution is a joke also. We find we need all of our organs to work together to live. The heart, the blood, the views for instance, all need to be there to function. Did we grope around blind in search of food? Did the esophagus evolve before the stomach? Funny how science shows everything is decaying away. Only humanity has evolved the opposite way, for the better. That to me is an insane world view. Atheism is simply that distant land in the parable of the lost son. That's all it is. People think they can hide from God by ignoring him and thinking if they don't believe, they won't have to face judgement. But that's so irrational
@@shimauma42 it is.
His name is the way, the truth and THE life.
Without him everything would fly apart.
John 1 : 3
All things were made by him; and without him was not
A N Y T H I N G made that was made.
And it is impossible him to lie.
Bible. Hebrews 6:13-18
[13]For when God made promise to Abraham, because he could swear by no greater, he sware by himself,
[14]Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee.
[15]And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise.
[16]For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.
[17]Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath:
[18]That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:
THEY say gravity holds us here.
W R O N G ! HE holds all things together
1000 years is like 1 day to god
I agree with you. It is possible for young earth and old earth to both accept this.
Now there are several comments that appear here. Even one’s older than the one that states “no comments” here are strange.
Have you considered that the dispersion from the Tower of Babal was a dispersion not only tongues but also race. You can learn another language, but not another race. Race definitely keeps people apart.
I believe he tackled that on a series he did on this same channel about two years ago, and race simply boils down to culture and lineage, so language can therefore change culture, which may inherently change race if you move to a new area
Watch the video before this one, titled "What Makes a Race?"
Probably the different families dispersed from Babel had slightly different characteristics. If, for example, two dark skinned parents left Babel with their children (mostly dark skinned) then they would have had very little DNA coding for light skin to pass on to their descendants. Of course there has been so much mixing before and since that the majority of people today are somewhere in the middle.
What we call 'race' are merely superficial differences that exist on a spectrum. We are all members of the Human Race.
Could not be from race first, but the people who dispersed by language would take on the characteristics of the color of the majority of those peoples color, lighter would become lighter and darker become darker. And is the reason God does not judge according to color as the theory does, as in the theory the lighter you are the more intelligent you are.
I am haplogroup R-L1, which son do i come from? Thank you.
Shem
"Y"? "Y" not? I believed in Evolution decades ago. In time, I changed. Then, it struck me: If God is God, He can do most anything (he can't lie. Better to say, He won't lie) So, the 6,300 or years from Creation to now, it is perfectly compatible with God. God is God, do not mock Him. Amen.
I downloaded a copy of your book and found it every bit a page-turner as any book I've read. I'm disappointed that all I hear is crickets when I look for secular response. You may be getting more of it than we are, but they seem to silenced.
Almost like it's nonsense that real scientists are too busy to care about
Of course, the world is against it.
Look harder. Plenty of geneticists have addressed Nathaniel Jeanson's 'work'.
It's pseudoscience. Which is why he published a book, instead of publishing an article or paper in a relevant peer-reviewed science journal, which is how these things are done in the real world.
Also, science is secular by definition, and if there were any validity to Jeanson's work, it would be big news in the world of science. It's an apologetics book, that's all it is. It may seem 'sciency' to lay persons, and Jeanson is a scientist, but his book is pseudoscience, unfortunately.
@@travisbicklepopsicle , you should challenge Nathaniel Jeanson to a debate! You seem fairly confident in your accusations and proclamations of his alleged "pseudoscience". You should put this all to rest!
@@raifcluster I wrote another long reply that is gone now for some reason. I'm not posting it again. In that comment, I mentioned a review by Creation Ministries International.. even a *creationist organization* is leery about his book..
Here's one from another scientist:
'JEANSON NT. Does' Y-chromosome Adam'Refute Genesis?. Institute for Creation Research. 2013.
As you see, it was ‘published’ by a non-scientific, religious institution with a self-admitted non-evidence-based bias. Nobody peer-reviewed the work. It was never published in any peer-reviewed journal.
Any reputable scientist who might have been asked to review the work wouldn’t have only had objections, they would have recommended it be deposited in the circular file where it belonged.'
Ian H Lester, Phylogenetics, Mol Biol Sc Advanced, Australian National University.
There are plenty more scientists out there who have already falsified Jeanson's work.. besides, geneticists and anthropologists figured out quite a while back that modern humans first arose in Africa around 200,000 years ago, and since Jeanson is working within a 6,000 or so year time frame, well..
Pseudoscience from a creationist author. That's all it is.
'You should challenge him to a debate"
No, I shouldn't :-) What would that accomplish? This issue is not about a 'debate'. It isn't about who puts forth the best arguments, or who can 'win over' the listeners. It's about *science*, about data and evidence, not about debating..
Where did you find known DNA from Adam to compare this?
DNA is inherited and passed down. So you have Adams DNA in you.
@@rbelf001 In DNA comparisons between humans and animals, researchers have found that humans share more DNA with monkeys than they do with other mammals, but the actual percentages can be surprising. Whereas rhesus monkeys and humans share about 93 percent of their DNA, the Abyssinian house cat shares 90 percent of its DNA with humans. Mice and humans share, on average, about 85 percent of their DNA, which is one reason why mice are so useful for medical research.
@@jeffburton1326 Here is why. We were all made from the same materials. Earth
@@rbelf001 Yes. Evolution does cause this.
@@jeffburton1326 Amazing mice share (as you claim about 85%) yet monkeys/apes share more than any other mammal cannot be used to grow and transplant organs like mice can with supposedly less DNA than those monkeys. This proves we are NOT related to Monkeys/apes else they would be perfect donors for humans and perfect for growing human organs for transplant. The fact they are not able to be used to grow human organs proves they are NO relation of humans thereby proving evolution a farce.
Nice
I would be interested to see a study of some animal DNA analysis. example Dogs or Cats , using this same technique. it should show similar results.
Good Idea... and could help explain and link "kinds" of animals.
ie: Wolf, German Shepard, pug... etc.
The human genome project has mapped the entire DNA of humans. It shows that humans share 98.7% DNA with Bonobos and Chimps. So we have a common ancestor.
@@imafeltersnatch7634 I'm sure some "people" share more than just 98.7% .. lol !
One day you will when they complete the mapping of their genome.
E1b1a only being a few hundred years old? What of E1b1a found in MOTA and Rameses III? We done believe in carbons dating or all the other dating techniques used in the analysis of Ancient DNA that precedes 6000 years?
E1B1C is MOTA
The oldest E1B1A groups are outside AFRICAN let alone the E1B1* of the Natufian
@@demetriusbooker5760
-E1b1c is the OLD nomenclature.
- E1b1a is the new name that is the equivalent of E-V38/v100.
- E1b1a or V38 Unites Horn African E-329 (Mota) with the more West African centered E-M2. Thus m329 carriers in the East AND E-M2 carriers in the West (And Rameses) were E1b1a positive.
-The oldest E lineages have not been found in Natufian. They were found in 15 thousand year old North West Africans of the Iberomarusian cultural complex. These are 1000s of years older than Natufian.
@@AfricaTeacher sounds like you don't know genetics that well
V38 makes M2 E1B1A1
As well as E-m329 which is E1B1c or E1B1a1
Mota isn't M2 E1B1A1
When you are "positive" for anything under E1b1a then you are positive for E1b1a. I am E1b1a1b1a1g1a. This means I am also E1b1a. I have Ethiopia family who are positive E1b1a(v38) becssue they carry the E-M329 mutation that comes FROM E1b1a/V38.
@@AfricaTeacher v38 isn't THE SAME AS M2 E1B1A1!
MOTA IS E1B1A2 NOT V38
How do I contact Dr. Jeanson? I finally got the 23and me done so I want to send that information to him
The fossil layers could have been formed quickly? And why is all kind of modern animals missing in the fossils?
And why are the findings in the fossils always in a specific order, not determined by size??? 16:55
Specifically we are not Jewish we are Judean.
And we were long time associated and mixed with Ham-Noah prophesied Yaphet would dwell in our tents eventually. And being Shem does not guarantee you are Ysrael. You could easily be of Esau or Elamites who lived up north in Eurasia, Arphaxad, etc.
Hi, can someone kindly share the Chinese are descendants of which son of Noah? Tks vm!
That would be Shem. Only going by geographic location at the time of the dispersion, which occurred after the flood.
@Zihan Nan
Chinese come from Sinites who descend from Canaan, a son of Ham.(Genesis 10:17)
Sino is a prefix used to denote China. Sinim in Hebrew refers to China.
Also there is genetics , East Asians do not have Semitic DNA.
The book of Jubilees gives an allocation of Shem’s Territory-encompassing the garden of Eden, from Israel/Lebanon to the whole of middle-east(west Asia), Iran and whole of India.
I believe in the Bible! I’ve listened to the claims of evolution and don’t believe theori
The origins of life happened over millions of years is what I don’t believe! Thank you for sharing the truth!
Complicated design need designer that's God
@@Braun09tv Same designer but distinctly different implementation although using similar phylogeny/functions/tools.