The Government should be doing this not charities! As Atlee said "Charity is the failure of Government" No offence to the brilliant charity workers and volunteers doing their best.
Governments only want as much money as they can get from the people, and no matter how much money they get they will always spend more, at least with charities people who want to help can band together and provide that help and the help actually goes to the people that they’re wanting to help, this would never happen with the government as all the money just goes to the treasury. To be spent on this weeks political whim.
No matter what Labour do, the Tories always trash it in order to reduce taxes for wealthy earners. They believe that it is their jobs to stand on the backs of the poor to maintain their social position. Every election from now until we die of old age must be spent tactically voting to ensure the Tories never get another chance to destroy the lives of working people, they must never govern again.
Agreed! Everything has been thoroughly knackered these past 14 years! Still even before then we had charities supporting British citizens, but it was nowhere near the level it is now...
@@louiseknight462 it’s unbelievable that parents have children when they shouldn’t and it’s unbelievable that they put their children in a position to have no beds. Why should the UK pick up the bill of bad parents? It’s simply not fair on those who are sensible about money
@@dkbmaestrorules if you have a secure job that pays decently a house then you can cope even if you have a wobble. If you are qualified in a decent job then you can still make your way. People who are not in this position shouldn’t be having children until they are stable.
You can say what you want about Gordon Brown - I thought he was an ineffective PM, but he has always, always banged the drum about taking children out of poverty. You can look back and he has never stopped with that issue throughout his whole career, it's been something close to his heart since he was young.
@@kingmaxthe_first3389 Unfortunately he was, he took the reins at a time when the government was already on its way out. He was an excellent cabinet minister and chancellor but was never equipped to be the main man. He had great values as a politician but wasn't PM material.
@@Dana-ml7sy He sold off the gold reserves in order to stabilise the markets and thus protect the UK from recession. Many countries, including some of our European neighbours, experienced recession in 2001. The UK did not.
He's not going to drop in direct cash into more welfare, but instead address the issue at its root. Poor wages, high bills, low regional opportunity, inadequate childcare.
@@FRESHNESSSSSS more taxes will push up cost of living what labor always do ! growing government bigger causes it to go up too ! socialism policy are no benefit to middle class growth
"COO-kers", I always did find this man heartwarming and genuine. His accent is just a cherry on top. As great work as charities do, it is the failure of the government, not his, but one he backs.
we are born to serve generally bio be it on the shopfloor or the trenches and if we get through that in one piece we are chucked on the scrapheap too poor to afford the funeral , it makes me wonder why we serve
@@garriejackson9551 It's irrelevant now. They are opposition and we need to hold the Government to account (because they clearly won't, PMQs was a circle jerk this afternoon)
@Robservations its not irrelevant they caused 14 years if damage which will take labour a good portion of time undoing, a good exampe is we are currently moving towards rejoining the EU which will take time thay we wouldnt have to waste if the public hadnt been manipulated and gaslit by the narcissistic tories
@@xMrjamjam that's right, when they punish their MPs in the exact same way Tories did it's completely irrelevant. Corbyn defied Tony Blair's gov over 400 times and did not lose the whip. This authoritarian action shows who we are dealing with. And don't be daft. We are not rejoining the EU. Ever.
I know Gordon Brown is doing and working so hard with all the powers he can to help child poverty. It’s so wrong that we as nation have to look at charities to come to the aid of poverty, it’s wrong that we as a nation have to look at church’s, temple’s and synagogue’s to come to the aid of the of poverty, and it’s wrong for we as nation have to look at foundations to come to the aid of poverty. We the United Kingdom have a redistribution of wealth where welfare doesn’t help anymore, where middle class is shrinking and losing their wealth, where the government has no assets, no money and indebted. So who has all that money, holding on to the debt of others, of governments and of society, the answer the super wealthy. Some say we can’t have a redistribution but we’ve already got a redistribution of wealth from the poor, from the middle and from the government to the wealthy and super wealthy. The Uk has a cancer and that cancer is inequity. The answer is not to grow but to tax the super wealthy, passive income and tax their assets, because they hold all the cards, and society is left with the Jokers in the pack. It’s time for the UK to tax, tax and tax the super wealthy to reclaim our Ace’s back.
Philanthropy is a sign of insufficient taxation. This is advertising for Amazon et al. If they were properly taxed and were paying more to their staff, perhaps the need for such charity may not be so urgent. SMDH
Expecting child poverty and the 2 child cap to be sorted within 4 weeks of getting into government is a stretch. Give them a chance to cost everything up - a lot of Labour MPs believe they will amend the cap when the time is right
@@user-pp9yk3tu4z But that does nothing about child poverty. And at the end of the day it's no kid's fault for being born, not like they had a choice is it.
@@FRESHNESSSSSS of course it’s not the kids fault and it’s awful that kids are put in the position they are put in but ultimately it is their parents fault. Why should someone else pick up the bill for parents being bad parents.
@@user-pp9yk3tu4z Apart from anything else because we have a massively declining birth rate which will be absolutely catastrophic for the country (and is happening across all the western powers at the moment). People have stopped having babies because it's unaffordable. More state support is inevitable.
Good to see charities stepping up and to see Gordon Brown's support. I hope the government doesn't delay stepping up too long. I wonder whether Gordon Brown has any influence left to hurry them up. Could he speak up publicly to say the whip whould not have been suspended for voting to end child poverty?
@@ArranVid great British geniuses like Nigel farage and boris Johnson(a German and an American). This is why we need a complete overhaul of the education system so we can actually become an intelligent country again rather than this brain rot where people don’t even know their arse from their elbow and it’s scary.
When people who are in work and can barely afford to eat stop giving to charity , Will any of the main party politicians make the American corporations that are taking over our country pay the taxes that would have been paid by British companies?
It is good that Gordon is speaking out…… BUT house prices increased 300% from 1997 to 2007 (when real inflation was only 17%) …..tripled! Surely the housing costs we have now are the biggest contributor to poverty, unaffordable rents, unaffordable mortgages in real terms because housing costs are so high etc etc……did the root of todays poverty problems accelerate in that 10 years of housing madness I wonder?
It's a disgrace that a rich western country has to rely on charity to look after the basic needs of some of it's citizens. Why isn't Gordon Brown holding Kid Starver to account for his cruel tory policy loving new goverment.
You mean the British people. Tories didn't just walk in you know, they were elected. By the will of the people as they were so fond of reminding everyone. 😂
Whilst I appreciate what Gordon Brown is trying to do, the real problem is the low pay, pensions, and benefits that go with the high rents, transport costs, care costs, fuel and water costs. The Government has just put an obstacle in the way of alleviating these problems and disciplined those who tried to do something about it. That is shameful.
Gordon Brown butcher of Iraq, very bankster friendly, larger gap between rich and poor under him and Blair then Thatcher and Major, and an enemy to the Corbyn project. yes great guy to talk about ending child poverty or any poverty. do better Politics Joe!
My solution: keep the 2 child cap. For childrens 3, 4 etc the benefit money is supplied as an interest free loan. This could be similar to student loans where by the money is paid back when the patents earn over a certain threshold later in life.
Agreed Gordon and I appreciate the effort... But please tell Starmer to lift the cap and tax wealth which would help negate the need for multibanks in the first place - prevention's better than cure and all that!!
Yes and higher wages. But I think more house building should be the top priority. Without excess supply, landlords could just increase rents to eat up any extra money for themselves.
Gordon Brown is a good man trying his best to help out. Hopefully once Reeves has finished doing her budget, they will begin the work towards making sure that charity isn't necessary.
I will repeat this from what i posted elsewhere: Labour are still going to eliminate this universal credit cap - once they can show it can be balanced in their budget. Them not taking this approach will lead to them going back into opposition for the next 10+ years...
Really? So why was absolute child poverty higher at the end of Gordon Brown's government in 2010 than it is today? 3.6 million children - about one in four in the UK - live in households in absolute poverty. The figure for 2022-23 was nearly 320,000 more children than in the year before - the largest increase in over 40 years. Absolute poverty is a measure of households who can afford less than 60% of what the average income would have bought in 2010-11, adjusted for rising prices. This has historically fallen over time and the current level of absolute poverty is slightly lower than when the Conservatives came to power in 2010, when it was 3.7 million children. So the numbers in absolute child poverty at the end of the last Labour government, the one that Gordon Brown led, was higher than it was at the end of the last tory government, albeit almost identical. Both parties are lying.
@@captainwin6333You need to take into account the 2008 financial crisis - which was worldwide. We also still had functional healthcare (some of the best in the world) and infrastructure...until the tories gutted them out...
To be fair some of his policies were useful in supporting the poorest in our communities, working, non-working, disabled and deprived of other means. However he never challenged the corporations, businesses, and landlords who exploited this support, by not increasing wages, extracting private rents etc.
Seriously gordy??? Multibanks??? Charities have been supplying all of those 'multibank' items for decades. And who are the companies? Would they be donating free beds,flooring etc or will councils be contracting those 'companies' ,paying them to supply items from multibanks? Smells like more bs
UK Unequal Kingdom. Use your voice to tell Starmer that poverty alleviating is a FIRST priority, not an OPTION. Support the Scottish Parliament and SNP Govt. Stop blindly following London. London's
As long as a couple, they have the rent and bills at home 3 times higher than the Salary, just talk for nothing. Solve the problem of the bubble, with the houses, these Landlord's who sit with their hands in the pockets of the Workers!!
When did it become the governments responsibility to bring up children? And when did it stop being the parents responsibility to bring up children? If children are growing up in poverty it is the parents responsibility to get a job and earn some money so that they can pay for things, giving these people more money doesn’t guarantee the money will go to the children, In fact, you can pretty much guarantee that the money won’t go to the children.
I believe you was misunderstood Gordon , you must look at the labour party and ask yourself what happened , good government is about providing the best country you can for the country ,and communities around Britain , I have nothing ,but I've always tried to help individuals 🙌
I have noticed that Gordon's mouth keeps doing the droop. I do not mean to be rude to him, but what is the medical reason for his mouth always doing that? I have never seen that happen in anyone else. By the way, I like Gordon Brown.
He talks a lot of crap. People don't need handouts, they need jobs. If they all weren't so greedy, then it wouldn't have gotten to this point. This is their way of locking in votes. He's highlighting what I call dependency love.😅😅😂😂
not true scot. snp have tried to do as much as they could with one hand tied to westmonster, , free edu extra money for kids always been free school meals and breakfast clubs. before foodbanks started popping up like mcdonalds in the 80s. to many rich getting richer and paying zerotax, there lies the problem, but theirgrrreat because the donate so much to charities.
You will never fix child poverty in the UK, there are just too many privileged powerful rich people who don't give a toss. The UK is basically an emerging economy and has been emerging for decades.
The Government should be doing this not charities!
As Atlee said "Charity is the failure of Government"
No offence to the brilliant charity workers and volunteers doing their best.
Attlee was right. Things are going backwards now.
Nailed it Dotty
Governments only want as much money as they can get from the people, and no matter how much money they get they will always spend more, at least with charities people who want to help can band together and provide that help and the help actually goes to the people that they’re wanting to help, this would never happen with the government as all the money just goes to the treasury. To be spent on this weeks political whim.
@@dotty1774 well said Dotty
No matter what Labour do, the Tories always trash it in order to reduce taxes for wealthy earners. They believe that it is their jobs to stand on the backs of the poor to maintain their social position.
Every election from now until we die of old age must be spent tactically voting to ensure the Tories never get another chance to destroy the lives of working people, they must never govern again.
Charity is a symptom, not a solution.
Agreed! Everything has been thoroughly knackered these past 14 years!
Still even before then we had charities supporting British citizens, but it was nowhere near the level it is now...
Then change the symptom
@@garriejackson9551 oh wow, thanks. I hadn't thought of that...
@@Chris47368spot on
oh amazon are donating, maybe they should pay their tax as well
And pay their employees enough so that they don't need to use food banks.
Indeed. And treat their workers with dignity and respect.
Well said
It's unbelievable that there are children without beds, in the U.K. Gordon Brown is a good man to use his voice for this. 🏆
@@louiseknight462 it’s unbelievable that parents have children when they shouldn’t and it’s unbelievable that they put their children in a position to have no beds. Why should the UK pick up the bill of bad parents? It’s simply not fair on those who are sensible about money
@@user-pp9yk3tu4zah yes, because people's circumstances famously never change once they've had children 🙄 give your head a wobble mate
@@dkbmaestrorules if you have a secure job that pays decently a house then you can cope even if you have a wobble. If you are qualified in a decent job then you can still make your way. People who are not in this position shouldn’t be having children until they are stable.
Tax the millionaires and billionaires
Why should people need to rely on charities in 2024, in one of the richest countries in the world?
because we are not one of the richest country
@@namaewa-vx5rlUK is one of the richest countries; _we_ in the UK aren’t.
The welfare state is not god.
@@fburton8 Exactly
You can say what you want about Gordon Brown - I thought he was an ineffective PM, but he has always, always banged the drum about taking children out of poverty. You can look back and he has never stopped with that issue throughout his whole career, it's been something close to his heart since he was young.
He really wasn’t an ineffective pm
@@kingmaxthe_first3389 Unfortunately he was, he took the reins at a time when the government was already on its way out. He was an excellent cabinet minister and chancellor but was never equipped to be the main man. He had great values as a politician but wasn't PM material.
He was a terrible Chancellor. Cost the U.K. £21 Billion when he sold off half the UKs gold reserves! We need that money now!
@@Dana-ml7sy He sold off the gold reserves in order to stabilise the markets and thus protect the UK from recession. Many countries, including some of our European neighbours, experienced recession in 2001. The UK did not.
Gordon Brown was and still is a man of honour.
Maybe he shouldn't have bankrupted the country then and laid the foundations for a system where so many are in poverty...
The Tories made it worse and Starmer doesn't look like hes gunna help either
He's not going to drop in direct cash into more welfare, but instead address the issue at its root. Poor wages, high bills, low regional opportunity, inadequate childcare.
Give Starmer a chance, they've been in 4 weeks. They have said they're not going to make crazy promises until they can work out how to fund it.
@@FRESHNESSSSSS not even 3 weeks
@@FRESHNESSSSSS more taxes will push up cost of living what labor always do ! growing government bigger causes it to go up too ! socialism policy are no benefit to middle class growth
@@coopsnz1. Stick to politics in your own country.
Gordon brought the UK to its knees. Total clown.
Personally, I’d rather Amazon paid their tax!
well people need to think about their affordability before having children and make them suffer with them.
How about Amazon recognizing unions?
For goodness sake sod charity- tax wealth, tax the multimillionaires and billionaires who aren't paying their fair share! For shame!
#garyseconomics
"COO-kers", I always did find this man heartwarming and genuine. His accent is just a cherry on top. As great work as charities do, it is the failure of the government, not his, but one he backs.
Bit late for that was saying that in the 70s when I was a kid I’m 51 and after 20 years military service I’m still poor
tbf, and this is a valid criticism of many a soldier... Did you piss away all your wages?
@@tisFrancesfaultthat is insulting
Sorry mate let us just hope this Labour government make a difference take care
@@annenunney9907 I mean it really isn't, if you know anything about soldiers...
we are born to serve generally bio be it on the shopfloor or the trenches and if we get through that in one piece we are chucked on the scrapheap too poor to afford the funeral , it makes me wonder why we serve
Jesus wept. Is this what he meant when he said Labour will end child poverty?
Yep! A load of bollocks
@@Tymbuswhat have the Tories done? The highest level of poverty for decades
@@garriejackson9551 It's irrelevant now. They are opposition and we need to hold the Government to account (because they clearly won't, PMQs was a circle jerk this afternoon)
@Robservations its not irrelevant they caused 14 years if damage which will take labour a good portion of time undoing, a good exampe is we are currently moving towards rejoining the EU which will take time thay we wouldnt have to waste if the public hadnt been manipulated and gaslit by the narcissistic tories
@@xMrjamjam that's right, when they punish their MPs in the exact same way Tories did it's completely irrelevant. Corbyn defied Tony Blair's gov over 400 times and did not lose the whip. This authoritarian action shows who we are dealing with.
And don't be daft. We are not rejoining the EU. Ever.
I know Gordon Brown is doing and working so hard with all the powers he can to help child poverty. It’s so wrong that we as nation have to look at charities to come to the aid of poverty, it’s wrong that we as a nation have to look at church’s, temple’s and synagogue’s to come to the aid of the of poverty, and it’s wrong for we as nation have to look at foundations to come to the aid of poverty. We the United Kingdom have a redistribution of wealth where welfare doesn’t help anymore, where middle class is shrinking and losing their wealth, where the government has no assets, no money and indebted. So who has all that money, holding on to the debt of others, of governments and of society, the answer the super wealthy. Some say we can’t have a redistribution but we’ve already got a redistribution of wealth from the poor, from the middle and from the government to the wealthy and super wealthy. The Uk has a cancer and that cancer is inequity. The answer is not to grow but to tax the super wealthy, passive income and tax their assets, because they hold all the cards, and society is left with the Jokers in the pack. It’s time for the UK to tax, tax and tax the super wealthy to reclaim our Ace’s back.
Starmer is getting shown up by an ex-PM and I’m here for it
Philanthropy is a sign of insufficient taxation.
This is advertising for Amazon et al.
If they were properly taxed and were paying more to their staff, perhaps the need for such charity may not be so urgent.
SMDH
Followed swiftly by shenanigans in Wastemonster over the 2 child cap
Expecting child poverty and the 2 child cap to be sorted within 4 weeks of getting into government is a stretch.
Give them a chance to cost everything up - a lot of Labour MPs believe they will amend the cap when the time is right
The cap should remain. Don’t have kids if you can’t afford them, simple as.
@@user-pp9yk3tu4z But that does nothing about child poverty. And at the end of the day it's no kid's fault for being born, not like they had a choice is it.
@@FRESHNESSSSSS of course it’s not the kids fault and it’s awful that kids are put in the position they are put in but ultimately it is their parents fault. Why should someone else pick up the bill for parents being bad parents.
@@user-pp9yk3tu4z Apart from anything else because we have a massively declining birth rate which will be absolutely catastrophic for the country (and is happening across all the western powers at the moment). People have stopped having babies because it's unaffordable. More state support is inevitable.
...and the economic state of the country when you left office in 2010 was?
Good to see charities stepping up and to see Gordon Brown's support. I hope the government doesn't delay stepping up too long. I wonder whether Gordon Brown has any influence left to hurry them up. Could he speak up publicly to say the whip whould not have been suspended for voting to end child poverty?
These are not the views of our prime minister Sir Kid Starver.
@@marcel-ifc17 He is not a bot, and Sir Kid Starver sucks.
@@ArranVid great British geniuses like Nigel farage and boris Johnson(a German and an American). This is why we need a complete overhaul of the education system so we can actually become an intelligent country again rather than this brain rot where people don’t even know their arse from their elbow and it’s scary.
😮
NEW Labour: Please help us not tax billionaires & multimillionaires 1% more
FFS! 😠
When people who are in work and can barely afford to eat stop giving to charity , Will any of the main party politicians make the American corporations that are taking over our country pay the taxes that would have been paid by British companies?
franchise own 90% businesses who avoiding taxes the left media lie taxes higher for franchise why prices up or you go bankrupt
net profit down for supermarkets in australia ! taxes up 20% oh wait that inflation 15% at fault
It is good that Gordon is speaking out…… BUT house prices increased 300% from 1997 to 2007 (when real inflation was only 17%) …..tripled! Surely the housing costs we have now are the biggest contributor to poverty, unaffordable rents, unaffordable mortgages in real terms because housing costs are so high etc etc……did the root of todays poverty problems accelerate in that 10 years of housing madness I wonder?
I have never heard Starmer go into this kind of detail when talking about poverty. Labour party are a joke.
When I was young , we where so poor our nanny wasn't even attractive.
It's a disgrace that a rich western country has to rely on charity to look after the basic needs of some of it's citizens. Why isn't Gordon Brown holding Kid Starver to account for his cruel tory policy loving new goverment.
the irony . get charities to do the gov work. tories in red
Tell Starmer
The best way to stop poverty is to make work pay. Work in the UK as become slave labour.
Yes low bad wages. Outgoings are too high.
Speak to Starmer .....we know this ....he seems to have not got the memo dude ....
*The UK did do away with child poverty, then the Tories put it right back!*
You mean the British people. Tories didn't just walk in you know, they were elected. By the will of the people as they were so fond of reminding everyone. 😂
@@wynbaxi5910Not by all.
Gorden brown was true good man
People are very concerned about this.
Lol Amazon. Just tax then properly instead
If children have nowhere to live, why did new labour import millions of cheap labour, pushing up house prices and rents.
At least this time he knows that the microphone 🎤is switched on 😂.
Whilst I appreciate what Gordon Brown is trying to do, the real problem is the low pay, pensions, and benefits that go with the high rents, transport costs, care costs, fuel and water costs. The Government has just put an obstacle in the way of alleviating these problems and disciplined those who tried to do something about it. That is shameful.
Sticking plaster dependent on volunteers
Liebour hypocrite the party left the Scottish taxpayers a £30bn bill with pfi. They brought in austerity and support brexit.
Pay a fair wage and don’t tax the shit out of us then?
I can't believe this is happening in 21st century Britain ! . Wish Brown was p.m instead of kid starver .
Gordon Brown butcher of Iraq, very bankster friendly, larger gap between rich and poor under him and Blair then Thatcher and Major, and an enemy to the Corbyn project. yes great guy to talk about ending child poverty or any poverty. do better Politics Joe!
At least there is some empathy there. Keir Stalin doesn’t care whatsoever.
@cantin8697 well Stalin also didn’t give a f about poverty
increasing need for charity's a failure of government, simple as that
the growth of a nation can be achieved while keeping the downtroded down
It is an epidemic how children go without in a rich country. The charities are fantastic 💕💕
My solution: keep the 2 child cap. For childrens 3, 4 etc the benefit money is supplied as an interest free loan. This could be similar to student loans where by the money is paid back when the patents earn over a certain threshold later in life.
Agreed Gordon and I appreciate the effort...
But please tell Starmer to lift the cap and tax wealth which would help negate the need for multibanks in the first place - prevention's better than cure and all that!!
They want us to bank our kids!!!1! What is the world coming to!
Time to end the redistribution of wealth to the high earners.
Every Labour MP has said the same , then came up with a cheap excuse to vote against child poverty.
People enjoy giving.
Well done gordon about time some body stands up for the poor
A respect Gordon Brown.
A rare politician with ethics (not keen on the Amazon advert though)
There part of the problem 😊
Even one kid in gb in 2024 in poverty is a disgrace what was the stats in 2010 I wonder
I may have disagreed with Mr Brown here and there but I genuinely believe he wants what is best for people.
We are 6th in the world for GDP but 27th for GDP per capita.That shows you the governments priorities.
The solution to this situation is to get rid of the monarchy
We are 27th in GDP per capita.
Lower taxes for working people would bring them out of poverty.
Yes, we’re no longer really one of the richest countries the world are we?
and higher taxes for those who can afford them,... and tory voters.
Yes and higher wages. But I think more house building should be the top priority. Without excess supply, landlords could just increase rents to eat up any extra money for themselves.
Shame Flip Flop Starmer's labour party isn't listening.
Yes it's almost a month now innit.
@@Paul-eb4jp haven't been listening for a lot longer than that
Gordon Brown is a good man trying his best to help out. Hopefully once Reeves has finished doing her budget, they will begin the work towards making sure that charity isn't necessary.
if only there was some kind of cap labour could lift to massively decrease chid poverty
Cameron's Big Society still going strong.
I will repeat this from what i posted elsewhere: Labour are still going to eliminate this universal credit cap - once they can show it can be balanced in their budget.
Them not taking this approach will lead to them going back into opposition for the next 10+ years...
Really? So why was absolute child poverty higher at the end of Gordon Brown's government in 2010 than it is today?
3.6 million children - about one in four in the UK - live in households in absolute poverty.
The figure for 2022-23 was nearly 320,000 more children than in the year before - the largest increase in over 40 years.
Absolute poverty is a measure of households who can afford less than 60% of what the average income would have bought in 2010-11, adjusted for rising prices.
This has historically fallen over time and the current level of absolute poverty is slightly lower than when the Conservatives came to power in 2010, when it was 3.7 million children.
So the numbers in absolute child poverty at the end of the last Labour government, the one that Gordon Brown led, was higher than it was at the end of the last tory government, albeit almost identical. Both parties are lying.
@@captainwin6333You need to take into account the 2008 financial crisis - which was worldwide.
We also still had functional healthcare (some of the best in the world) and infrastructure...until the tories gutted them out...
Maybe the new Labour government should listen to this great man. Getting rid of the two-child benefit cap would be a good start...
To be fair some of his policies were useful in supporting the poorest in our communities, working, non-working, disabled and deprived of other means. However he never challenged the corporations, businesses, and landlords who exploited this support, by not increasing wages, extracting private rents etc.
You know in the film Daybreakers when the vampires havent fed for a while?
No reason.
Not just this im 65 no cooker fridge dead i work cant retire 😅😅ff uk politicians
A true labour leader.
So stop sending our taxes abroad then. Sort our our own houses first!
Charity begins at home 🏡
Stop printing money then
A hand up' not a hand down',,a wise man once said..don't think it was an mp that said that!
Seriously gordy??? Multibanks??? Charities have been supplying all of those 'multibank' items for decades. And who are the companies? Would they be donating free beds,flooring etc or will councils be contracting those 'companies' ,paying them to supply items from multibanks? Smells like more bs
UK Unequal Kingdom. Use your voice to tell Starmer that poverty alleviating is a FIRST priority, not an OPTION.
Support the Scottish Parliament and SNP Govt.
Stop blindly following London. London's
Gordon Brown,
Texture like sun...
Under-rated politician.
This is the man who said that grooming gang victims were taking a 'lifestyle choice'
What?
Every time I hear Gordon speak I am incredibly sad for the possible present we could have had if he had won the General Election in 2010.
As long as a couple, they have the rent and bills at home 3 times higher than the Salary, just talk for nothing. Solve the problem of the bubble, with the houses, these Landlord's who sit with their hands in the pockets of the Workers!!
Golden Brown texture like sun 🌞 dried up like a raisin.
When did it become the governments responsibility to bring up children? And when did it stop being the parents responsibility to bring up children? If children are growing up in poverty it is the parents responsibility to get a job and earn some money so that they can pay for things, giving these people more money doesn’t guarantee the money will go to the children, In fact, you can pretty much guarantee that the money won’t go to the children.
Gideon GobSh7te . . . . where's the gold?
I believe you was misunderstood Gordon , you must look at the labour party and ask yourself what happened , good government is about providing the best country you can for the country ,and communities around Britain , I have nothing ,but I've always tried to help individuals 🙌
Gordon Brown 14 years ago looked really young. How did he age a lot after he left office?
look at a picture of yourself from 14 years ago. don't tell me you also aged a lot since then
He's 73, give him a break.
59 vs 73 will do that to you
@@frankiewilde7791 and a kit-kat
I have noticed that Gordon's mouth keeps doing the droop. I do not mean to be rude to him, but what is the medical reason for his mouth always doing that? I have never seen that happen in anyone else. By the way, I like Gordon Brown.
It’s fantastic that Gordon has managed to get Amazon on side. Fantastic 👏🏻 🇬🇧
God bless that man.
Myself friends and family will continue to vote reform. Never ever ever again trust the tories or Labour
Drizzle.
Reform are just more of the same. They would ruin this country
He talks a lot of crap. People don't need handouts, they need jobs. If they all weren't so greedy, then it wouldn't have gotten to this point. This is their way of locking in votes. He's highlighting what I call dependency love.😅😅😂😂
not true scot. snp have tried to do as much as they could with one hand tied to westmonster, , free edu extra money for kids always been free school meals and breakfast clubs. before foodbanks started popping up like mcdonalds in the 80s. to many rich getting richer and paying zerotax, there lies the problem, but theirgrrreat because the donate so much to charities.
Plenty of beds if you're an illegal at Best Western..
You will never fix child poverty in the UK, there are just too many privileged powerful rich people who don't give a toss. The UK is basically an emerging economy and has been emerging for decades.
@heathermoore9892 lived frugal & worked hard ! ive never bought new cars i buy used cars im tax less a millennial
@heathermoore9892 Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Exhibit A.
@heathermoore9892 'Probably'
The word of someone making judgements based off assumptions without real evidence
Yeah right, as if he gives a sh** !
he really does!
Why didn’t you do it in government, you had more than long enough!
Charity shouldn’t exist