“Stairway to Life” is a very good book on this topic, well worth reading. Another excellent resource is Dr. James Tour, a world renowned synthetic organic chemist. He has lots of highly evidenced, highly detailed YT videos on this topic and the fallacy of evolution.
Thank you, Pam Acker and Sensus Fidelium, God Bless you all. What bothers me as this was the subject of this lecture on evolution and mutation onto genetic code, what she explained is also what many believe and feared would and can have from that which was put into so many people's bodies.
If our educational system was functional, youth would be able to understand this, at least on the surface level. If our social system was functional, they would also find it interesting at least to the point of inspiring curiosity and logical thought. This is in contrast to how one might feel about information. It's neither good nor bad, it just is.
Gave up after 7 minutes despite a strong interest in the topic. A verbose monologue difficult to follow due to bad audio quality and at times too fast talking. Content gets an A, presentation a generous D. Good luck to get ordinary catholics to watch it.
@@bootlegapplesShe makes no effort, whatsoever, to support her flippant White-man-with-PhD-bad opinion, either. Notice, too, her petulance when stating “… because HE is a doctor and I am not,” in relation to the credibility given to male researchers with PhDs over her own opinions/conclusions. Unfortunately, these irrational/illogical biases cast rather large shadows of suspicion and distrust over the entire lecture.
@@kfgabriele9852 it indicates a narrative bias,that she's serving an extraneous narrative as it tells me her emotional likely play a large role in in reasoning - typically in support of emotional intuitive narratives over cool head/long term term search for truth.Sounds weird maybe but it's the pattern I have observed for years,supported by objective data especially about male/female cognition/sensibilities.Shes smart obviously,possessing knowledge - it's the red flags of social justice-speak that casts said shadow over her assertions.
V refreshing to hear this from a v knowledgeable lady.
“Stairway to Life” is a very good book on this topic, well worth reading. Another excellent resource is Dr. James Tour, a world renowned synthetic organic chemist. He has lots of highly evidenced, highly detailed YT videos on this topic and the fallacy of evolution.
Thank you, Pam Acker and Sensus Fidelium, God Bless you all. What bothers me as this was the subject of this lecture on evolution and mutation onto genetic code, what she explained is also what many believe and feared would and can have from that which was put into so many people's bodies.
Interesting 🧐
If our educational system was functional, youth would be able to understand this, at least on the surface level.
If our social system was functional, they would also find it interesting at least to the point of inspiring curiosity and logical thought.
This is in contrast to how one might feel about information. It's neither good nor bad, it just is.
Alot went over my pay grade but interesting nonetheless
Gave up after 7 minutes despite a strong interest in the topic. A verbose monologue difficult to follow due to bad audio quality and at times too fast talking. Content gets an A, presentation a generous D.
Good luck to get ordinary catholics to watch it.
I’m not sure that baby got much out of this talk.
she's a lib
She just pointed out the irony of mostly white men, most likely liberals, who propose that the sickle cell mutation in Africans is proof of evolution.
"White males" conspiracy theory or implying they're wholesale hostile to blacks...yup
@@SydneyCarton2085Yes. She’s certainly making her biases rather obvious.
@@bootlegapplesShe makes no effort, whatsoever, to support her flippant White-man-with-PhD-bad opinion, either. Notice, too, her petulance when stating “… because HE is a doctor and I am not,” in relation to the credibility given to male researchers with PhDs over her own opinions/conclusions. Unfortunately, these irrational/illogical biases cast rather large shadows of suspicion and distrust over the entire lecture.
@@kfgabriele9852 it indicates a narrative bias,that she's serving an extraneous narrative as it tells me her emotional likely play a large role in in reasoning - typically in support of emotional intuitive narratives over cool head/long term term search for truth.Sounds weird maybe but it's the pattern I have observed for years,supported by objective data especially about male/female cognition/sensibilities.Shes smart obviously,possessing knowledge - it's the red flags of social justice-speak that casts said shadow over her assertions.