The Extraordinary 4-Dimensional Design of DNA - Dr. Robert Carter
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- Taken from "Beyond Is Genesis History? Vol 2 : Life & Design." Available in full here:
bit.ly/2QlPtQV
Explore the fascinating fields of biology, genetics, and intelligent design with 16 in-depth interviews featuring Del Tackett and six scientists from the film.
Marine Biologist Rob Carter explores the four-dimensional genome, showing how it works on many different levels and how it is far more complex than any computer we have created.
☞ Purchase all three in the series here: bit.ly/2MWY7Tx
Dr. Carter obtained a BS in Applied Biology from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1992.
He then spent four years teaching high school biology, chemistry, physics, and electronics before going to the University of Miami to obtain his PhD in Marine Biology. He successfully completed this program in 2003 with a dissertation on “Cnidarian Fluorescent Proteins.” While in Miami, he studied the genetics of pigmentation in corals and other invertebrates, designed and built an aquaculture facility for Caribbean corals, performed well over 500 SCUBA dives, many of them at night, and licensed a spin-off product of his research (a patented fluorescent protein) to a biotech company. He is currently a senior scientist and speaker for CMI-USA in Atlanta, Georgia.
For more information on Dr. Carter, please go to bit.ly/342HUnF.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
“I am fearfully and wonderfully made” is an understatement! We are the image of the invisible. This is utterly mind blowing
Well, right, it has already blown your mind :D
We truly cant completely comprehend Gods power and abilities. I mean the simple thing of oxygen which we breath....how that come to be out of nothing?
@@darthbane2669 Who told you, that it came out of nothing? What a nonsense. Before you start to discuss such things you should better spend a few years learning the basics...
Brett , I'm going to blow your mind with this ;
Imagine being in , let's say in NYC , it's massively crowded , , , how many are going to believe in GOD as you described ?
Ok , the rest who don't , try to imagine the greatness of GOD having grace & mercy on every single person that none should perish , , but that yet it is within each person to make that choice to believe or not believe ,
Then try to imagine any parent who has lost a loved child prematurely in their life , the grieving for that child or other loved one to be there , to not not be there to be a continuous part of life ,
Now , try to grasp the heart of GOD yearning for every single person to want to come to the cross , to come to know JESUS for the forgiveness of sins , to look forward to the day they will be reunited with their FATHER in Heaven ,
Imagine the same on the scale of the whole world's population , everyone living & dying , each in their own cultures & customs , a lot don't even know anything about who GOD really is , only what they get raised to believe even if it's blatantly opposed to GOD ,
Yet , GOD is there waiting to be revealed to them if only someone could get the message across without getting killed for violating their pagan rites ,
And too , GOD suffers for each one who perishes without knowing HIS SON's life & message of the gospels ,
I'm saying this to you that you might truly appreciate how wonderfully you are made in HIS image , every bit as every one ,
I get no greater joy than to talk about GOD , about HIS SON JESUS who lived as a man that even HE knows what man endures on this side of life ,
I hope this catches you on a good day , that you'll appreciate ,
Love , in JESUS
I dunno if there was anything fearful or wonderful about your parents having sex. The image of the invisible is invisible.
"My ways are not your ways"
Praise the Lord!! 💗💗💗
This video should be mandatory in every school!
Satanism has had it's run long enough "evolution theory" I say it's well past time that Jesus Christ is put back in schools where he belongs, to teach children the truth.
@@patldennis explain?
I’m interested to understand why you have stated that a law against this mans knowledge is a good thing?
It should be an elective in schools. This is a secular democracy. Separation of church and state. This is a nation of inclusiveness and of law. I, personally, thoroughly enjoy this documentary. But it should never be my right, or anyone else's, to mandate that anyone else must view it.
I thought that too. Every Atheist should watch this who believes in “science.”
AAAAAAAAAAMEN!
I went to school for physics and geology and this is what my mind has been visualizing for god and science for 15 years. And I got it all in a video. This is amazing! The universe is fascinating, god created a giant sandbox for our exploration.
God created humans for fellowship
This is the most mind blowing video I have seen in my life !
You should see 2 girls one cup.
That is absolutely mindblowing. Wow. DNA is 100% the biolanguage of God.
And evolution is 100% the mechanism with which God creates.
@KAHANU ERMEYAS-TULU then what is your alternative mechanism?
@@theTavis01 The man called Adam was created when God “formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7). ... He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” so was God talking to a adult man or a bacterie?
@@theTavis01 plus marco evolution has never been proven. So what are you even about.
@@x.r.d7744 "so was God talking to a adult man or a bacterie?" The science of evolution does *_NOT_* say that humans evolved from bacteria. We did, however, evolve from a single cell, which was just one step of many in the process of God forming us from the dust of the ground. A literal reading of Genesis 2:7 is a pagan ideology of a corporeal deity literally sculpting man with literal hands and giving it cpr. However the Bible explicitly tells us that this verse is *_NOT_* literal, by cross referencing Isaiah 64:8 and Job 10:9 where the *_EXACT_* same metaphor of God as sculptor is used to describe gestation, which scientifically starts as a single cell and slowly works upward to a human. Did God literally reach up inside your mom and literally sculpt you with literal hands? Nope. Does the scientific understanding of gestation cancel out God? Nope.
Psalms 139:14
I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
Wonderful are your works;
my soul knows it very well.
It’s crazy that there are people that still believe in the Big Bang.
Dr. Robert Carter is awesome to watch and listen to. A man who is full of Passion and very articulate. I find his observations and insights fascinating. I would love to see, ''Is Genesis History?'' do future interviews with Dr. Robert Carter. God bless
He is a wolf in sheep's clothing leading you astray with his false anti-evolution doctrine.
@@theTavis01 Dr. Carter lives to glorify God by celebrating God's exorbitantly ingenious design. Just the opposite of a wolf in sheep's clothing. The wolves are those who seek to diminish all that God has done by propagandizing for the atheistic belief in microbes to microbiologists evolutionism.
@@livinginthespirit407 "Dr. Carter lives to glorify God by celebrating God's exorbitantly ingenious design" But evolution is the strongest and best evidence of design, because it is the process and not just the end result. So by denying evolution he is failing in this noble quest. Evolution is not an "atheistic belief" any more than the science of gestation is an "atheistic belief." Atheists will claim that gestation is a blind unguided process resulting from the a chain reaction of molecular interactions causing a single cell to gradually turn into a human. Do you equally apply your anti-intellectual fervor to gestation? I doubt it. Psalm 139 tells us God knit us together in our mother's womb, but science doesn't say anything about knitting needles! Whatever will you do?? A mature Christian will look at the science of gestation and use it to show how miraculous the process is and therefor showing God's glory in it. If you're not willing to do the same for evolution, don't talk about it.
Robert Carter makes nonsensical statements like at 19:20 when he claims that "you cannot build high technology step by step" when in reality we know for a fact that all technology can ONLY be made step by step, and the evolution of technology is well documented and studied, showing all the salient characteristics of biological evolution. Robert Carter is bearing false witness. He claims it's impossible for complex systems to evolve over time. How did we go from a wooden cart to a Ferrari over centuries?? Why do we see a clear series of transitional forms along the way?? Like I said, evolution in biology is evidence of design, because we see it in all human designs.
@@smitty121981 Smitty: "But evolution is the strongest and best evidence of design, because it is the process and not just the end result. "
Living in the Spirit: Actually Evolution(ism) is the antithesis of intelligent design. It is taught to the school children as a way for an intelligent designer to be completely unnecessary.
Smitty: "Evolution is not an "atheistic belief" any more than the science of gestation is an "atheistic belief."
Living in the Spirit: Richard Dawkins said that Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist. Note that he was referring to microbes to mankind evolutionism that made this possible, not gestation. The way microbes to mankind evolutionism is taught to the school children, it is indeed atheistic and it provides Atheists with a belief system they can be passionate about, most especially the most anti-theistic among them such as Dawkins and other anti-theists such as Aron Ra. Gestation is known observable and repeatable phenomena just like the variation and adaptation of life which is contained within every model of origins (both mindless design and intelligent design). But these observational phenomena are completely unlike the never once observed belief that all life evolved from microbes via a mindless process. Do you really not see the difference?
Smitty: Atheists will claim that gestation is a blind unguided process resulting from the a chain reaction of molecular interactions causing a single cell to gradually turn into a human. Do you equally apply your anti-intellectual fervor to gestation? I doubt it. Psalm 139 tells us God knit us together in our mother's womb, but science doesn't say anything about knitting needles! Whatever will you do?? A mature Christian will look at the science of gestation and use it to show how miraculous the process is and therefor showing God's glory in it. If you're not willing to do the same for evolution, don't talk about it.
Living in the Spirit: Your comparison here between observable gestation and the never once observed belief that mankind "evolved" from microbes is incoherent. And your belief that microbes ever evolved into anything besides microbes is science denialism, pseudoscience, and fraud.
Smitty: Robert Carter makes nonsensical statements like at 19:20 when he claims that "you cannot build high technology step by step" when in reality we know for a fact that all technology can ONLY be made step by step, and the evolution of technology is well documented and studied, showing all the salient characteristics of biological evolution.
Living in the Spirit: You have taken his comment way out of context. He was referring to the need for irreducibly complex, multiple inter-dependent component systems to be comprehensively designed by an intelligent mind and they can not cobble themselves together step by step via a mindless process. An example would be the cardiovascular system. You can't have an organism with miles of blood vessels but no blood within them or no heart to pump blood through them. Another example would be Windows 10 which did not and could not arise via a fortuitous accumulation of copy errors.
Smitty: Robert Carter is bearing false witness.
Living in the Spirit: Actually his witness is true and yours is false. He is glorifying the intelligent designer and you are glorifying the belief in mindless processes and accumulated copy errors as the designer all of which is perfectly compatible with atheism and anti-theism.
Smitty: He claims it's impossible for complex systems to evolve over time. How did we go from a wooden cart to a Ferrari over centuries??
Living in the Spirit: Ferraris did not "evolve over time" via heredity, copy errors and other mindless processes, rather the Ferrari is an excellent example of intelligent design just as is is also true with DNA, molecular machinery, biological systems, etc.
Smitty: Why do we see a clear series of transitional forms along the way??
Living in the Spirit: In the case of the Wooden Cart and the Ferrari, each of these intelligently designed innovations serve a separate purpose and both continue to be intelligently designed today. As to how the Ferrari is more sophisticated than the Wooden Cart, intelligent minds grew in knowledge and became more accomplished as engineers. Nested heirarchies exist for various intelligently designed products and this does not mean they arrived via heredity, accumulated copy errors, etc. The important take home lesson is that an intelligent mind was necessary to build both the wooden cart and the Ferrari, they did not "evolve" via mindless naturalistic processes.
Smitty: Like I said, evolution in biology is evidence of design, because we see it in all human designs.
Living in the Spirit: Specified complexity and irreducible inter-dependent components within the systems of biology provide various life forms with the front loaded capacity to vary and adapt. All of this is powerful evidence for intelligent design, not for the supposed blind and mindless process of "microbes to mankind Neo Darwinian Evolutionism".
@@livinginthespirit407 "Richard Dawkins said" I don't care what some atheist said. I care what the Bible says and what the peer reviewed literature says.
"The way microbes to mankind evolutionism is taught to the school children, it is indeed atheistic" Well then maybe you should stop being a lying little weasel and start proclaiming God's glory in evolution!!! Christians are so spineless that they let atheists have full reign to interpret evolution as they see fit! Young earth creationism is a total abject failure which is driving people away from Christ and you are perpetuating it.
"the never once observed belief that all life evolved from microbes" Is a total boldface lie. It is easily observed, by looking at the fossil record, which at this point is comprised of hundreds of millions of carefully measured and catalogued fossils from around the world. The overall progression of life seen in the chronology of the fossil record is blatantly obvious to anyone. To claim that a single flood can somehow better account for the physical evidence of chronological succession of fossils is so incredibly dishonest that it makes me want to vomit even thinking about it.
"each of these intelligently designed innovations serve a separate purpose and both continue to be intelligently designed today." THE SAME IS TRUE IN GOD'S CREATION!!!
"He was referring to the need for irreducibly complex, multiple inter-dependent component systems to be comprehensively designed by an intelligent mind" and since we KNOW that God is sovereign over all of creation, then this is NOT an argument against evolution!!! SHEEESH!!! You are seriously going to sit there with a straight face and claim that God can create a fully functioning adult body in a single 24 hour day, but doing it over a longer period of time is simply asking too much???? For real??? You could claim that a smartphone has "multiple inter-dependent component systems" like a circuit board, processor, antennae, battery, etc. And yet we KNOW that the smartphone evolved from a large wooden box with a mechanical crank that had no battery or circuit board or processor or antenna. Your excuses fail immediately as soon as you consider evolution as being under the sovereignty of God.
"Windows 10 which did not and could not arise via a fortuitous accumulation of copy errors. " You're arguing against a strawman. Gird up your loins like a man and grapple with the TRUTH.
"you are glorifying the belief in mindless processes" No I am glorifying GOD by showing the ways in which evolution reveals God's characteristics. The modification and diversification of forms over time shows God's creativity. The selection and extinction events show God's judgment separating the wheat from the chaff. The length of time shows God's long suffering patience. The way in which God used evolution to terraform a barren space rock into a lush garden perfectly suited for human life - from the air we breathe to the food we eat to the bodies we inhabit - shows an extraordinary level of foresight and wisdom.
"provide various life forms with the front loaded capacity" Is fallacious pseudoscience nonsense. Nothing even remotely like this is supported by any actual data. Your acceptance of this over the vast mountain of science pointing otherwise shows an extreme level of dishonesty and cognitive bias.
"this does not mean they arrived via heredity, accumulated copy errors, etc. " um.... yes it does!! You SERIOUSLY think that technology does not "inherit" its blueprints from the previous generation, with some modifications??? And again, the science does not say that evolution must happen through "copy errors" that's a dishonest strawman. The biological fossil record shows EVERY salient characteristic of the technological record, so if this proves that evolution cannot happen through blind chance it means that EVOLUTION GLORIFIES GOD. It does NOT mean that evolution is somehow falsified, in any way whatsoever and to claim otherwise is just absurd. All you falsified is an outdated and widely criticized hypothesis for a possible MECHANISM of evolution. The mechanism is NOT the same consideration as the OCCURRENCE of evolution, which is undisputed outside of creationist circle jerks.
"All of this is powerful evidence for intelligent design" Right.....and to pretend like design somehow implies that evolution never happened is incredibly dishonest, especially in light of the fact that human technology follows the SAME pattern of development over time. Are you SERIOUSLY going to tell me with a straight face that a single flood event is a BETTER explanation for the meticulously catalogued fossil record???
What is truly a gift is God has created us to be able to slowly pick away at this and get an increasing understanding of how unfathomably intelligent His design is.
The Bible is poorly plagiarized from a dozen older religions, it's fiction.
YOU HAVE TO READ THE BIBLE 3 TIMES OR MORE TO GET THE OVERALL PICTURE, THE SAME KIND OF PEOPLE ARE ON EARTH NOW AS HAS ALWAYS BEEN, IT'S JUST THAT TIMES ARE DIFFERENT, IT GIVES A PERSON INSIGHT ON HOW TO READ PEOPLE AS YOU MEET THEM, AND BE ABLE TO TELL WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO TO YOU, AS FAR AS YOU CAN SEE THEM COMING. THE ADVICE IS THERE TO BE USED FOR INSIGHT. EACH TIME YOU READ FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END, THINGS BECOME MORE CLEAR. DON'T SKIP AROUND, IT'S HARDER TO GET THE OVERALL PICTURE.
if the design is Devine way so much variety -is it not the best plan that need t be reproduces over and over again? like in a factory ?and way there are birth defects -is god is imperfect?-is god crule ?when you go to the amazon and every few km you find a new speasis off beetle just a bit deferent than her neighbor was god extremely artistic ?
we are designed to be the library of the universe.
@@moodist1er if it's copied is irrelevant because it's true.
;)
I share this with people all the time. I've never heard a better explanation of what DNA is. Nearly perfect. Beautiful work gentlemen.
That guy for my science teacher!
“Evolution can only work if life is really, really simple”. Exactly correct Dr. Carter.. and we know life is really, really complicated. So the clear and obvious answer is a brilliant mind is behind all that we see and know.
That's factually incorrect, evolution happens at every level from single-cell organisms to humans.
@@aspacelex a lex, A dog cannot turn into a cat (macro evolution). The fossil record doesn’t show it, nor have we ever seen it. Micro evolution does occur within its own kind. This is proven and seen. I hope that distinction helps.
@@johncastino2730 Evolution says a dog can't turn into a cat, if a dog evolved into a new species, that species would still be a dog, just like humans are still apes and chickens are still dinosaurs, which the fossil record does show. Micro and macro evolution is the same mechanism, you can't deny one without the other.
@@aspacelex NeoDarwinists claim that all life came from non-life. Our top scientists say they have no idea how life/DNA originated from simple matter. And we find ourselves in a world that is finely tuned to a degree that is impossible to have occurred by chance. My studies of the various sciences led me to conclude that the scientific evidence proves beyond doubt there was a Creator.
- how did life come from non-life?
- how did so many kinds of life originate if dogs stay dogs and cats stay cats?
- where are the transitional fossils? Even one top atheist scientists said “if I knew of any transitional fossils I would offer them. But at this point I cannot find even one clear example of a transitional fossil”.
@@johncastino2730 Terms like "evolutionist" or "neo-Darwinist" exist exclusively in religious extremist echo chambers, the rest of the world doesn't deny evolution. Evolution has nothing to do with how non-living matter converted into living matter. That's a lie, they successfully recreated RNA in the lab from its basic components more than a decade ago. What about this universe is fine-tuned? There's zero support in any branch of science of the laughable notion that magic is real.
- This has nothing to do with evolution, but we've produced life from non-life in the lab. Chemicals that are alive aren't that much different from chemicals that aren't.
- Evolution states that dogs stay dogs even when they evolve into different species, like humans are still apes and chickens are still dinosaurs, which in no way contradicts the fact that species can evolve into different species.
- I don't care about some guy's feelings, the transitional fossils are all there.
I thank you very much, indeed, dear Dr, Robert Carter, for your joyful, evidence-based, and brilliant explanation.
The whole bit about this 6ft-long strand of instructions/blueprints/and resolutions and executables folding itself up in such a way where *that which ends up on the outside is the active part* at any given circumstance and it can re-fold and expose what's needed for the given moment if things change (or depending on what cell it belongs to)... My jaw is still on the table and I think a few teeth even fell out and are under the desk longing to be found... Seriously, atheists, that just happened BY ACCIDENT?
@Michael Fritsche - You've said nothing. You've heard researchers with different ideas that agree with your ideas so they must be right. Have you considered the evidence *right here* in this video? Stop using other peoples heads and use your own head. That's why God gave it to you.
@Michael Fritsche - I could really not care less about your "scientific consensus." I could not care less about your ivory towers. Haven't you got your own brain to work with?
You still haven't said anything.
@Michael Fritsche - Did I not make myself clear? I could care less about the consensus of the scientific community. Truth is not decided by concensus.
You still haven't said anything. Three strikes, you're out. You get no more responses from me.
@Michael Fritsche Hephaestus was a pretty cool dude, making stuff in the volcano all day long and getting his heart broken by the hotties. But the difference is that the God of the Bible is incorporeal and exists outside of Creation. Even the vast Hindu pantheon has some sort of Ultimate deity at the top. And so the patheon then just becomes archetypal ways of understanding certain energetic qualities within Creation. Don't let all these blasphemous fools turn you off with their ignorant rantings about evolution. God is sovereign over all things including evolution, and if you look you will see it. Seek and ye shall find, as Jesus said.
@@rubiks6 The evidence in this video in no way invalidates evolution. Not for a single second.
Thank you so much for explaining how wonderful and complex God´s creation is. God bless you.
My only explanation for how such brilliant minds can continue to tenaciously cling to evolution, is the only other option is admitting they are a sinner in need of a Savior.
Just because one cannot think of a solution to a hypothesis, doesn't mean there isn't one. It might mean it's beyond human comprehension entirely.
@Michael Fritsche Really,a proven fact eh.......lol
@Michael Fritsche Proven fact? A proven fact needs laws and regulations to prohibit the teaching of creation in public schools????
@Michael Fritsche Well looks like you have convinced yourself,nice job skippy.
@Michael Fritsche did you even watch this video? Some people ignore the obvious when its sitting right in front of them. Keep searching my freind.
I travel a lot in my job. During my long trips I use to watch those kind of videos. I watched almost all of your videos. I am so amazed by creation especially when described so in detail by the different scientific experts you bring on...
I often need to pause the video to ponder and then I just want to bow down in prayer to God the Creator, filled with awe for Jesus . I cannot help but to really wish to surrender every bit of myself to Him, my Creator and Savior! With every step I surrender more and more. I think that even though I gave my life and heart to Jesus as a child I find areas in my life wich still are in my own posession....Jesus take it all!
Praise be to His Name!
I feel the same way Comeon!
What's a god?
@@aspacelex An uncreated, immaterial, powerful, personal, intelligent, self-conscious, necessary being. If God were not ALL of those things, the universe could not have come into existence.
@@robertpreisser3547 We have a pretty good idea of when the character of Yahweh was created by humans, what were their inspirations, and how the concept has evolved over time.
How can you detect something that's immaterial?
Every single instance of intelligence, personality, and self-consciousness that's ever been observed has been a function of a material brain.
What are the functions he performs that make him necessary?
The universe didn't come into existence, it started to expand.
@@aspacelex No, we don’t “know” the things you claim we do. We know when Yahweh began interacting with mankind, but you are merely *assuming* that those reports are invented by human beings. Based on what evidence? Mere similarities? All of the supposed prior influences are (a) fundamentally different in crucial ways, and (b) where similar, can be equally well explained by all humanity starting with knowledge of Yahweh (through Adam and Eve if not Noah as well) and then diverging. Mere similaritiees don’t prove any were made up, let alone all of them were. Any more than stories of the Titanic sinking can refer to actual real world events despite the similarity to a previous story about a ship named the Titan that was thought unsinkable struck an iceberg on its starboard side, and lost most passengers due to an insufficient number of life rafts. Thar story was published years before any newspapers wrote about the Titanic’s sinking.
Second, you are assuming that the mind that possesses intelligence is equal to the physical brain. But that is quite simply not possibly true. All attempts to reduce consciousness to purely material processes in the brain have failed. There are fundamentally different aspects of mind states that differ from brain states in fundamental ways. The fact we can have abstract thoughts about thoughts contradicts physical reductionism, as well as the fact that reason itself cannot exist if the mind were nthing more than the brain. Every attempt to ground the mind solely in electrical impulses following an endless string of cause-and-effect events renders reason impossible. What you “know” is true would not necessarily be true. Merely what your brain happened to think at the moment, which could change completely tomorrow given different conditions. Every person who tries to make that claim is actually saying their own reason cannot be trusted to deliver actual truth.
But you are also making an invalid leap of logic in any case. First of all, even if it were true that “all” examples of intelligence we know of correlated with the presence of physical brains (and it’s not true), that does not at all prove that the brains were solely responsible for the intelligence observed.
That would be like saying because every single telephone conversation involved a transmitter and a receiver and wires in between those things were solely responsible for the conversations themselves. Or take this conversation: every comment thread ever recorded on RUclips involved computers of some sort on either end. Therefore you are clearly not a human being but must be a computer, right?
Of course not. But that’s the same logic error being made by concluding that since all examples of human intelligence involved a material brain, intelligence itself can only be material. That logic is invalid on multiple levels.
How do you detect something immaterial? By observing it’s effect on material things, of course. Simple. All one needs to do is find some effect that is not what normally happens in the normal course of events when matter-energy interact unguided. Then it becomes a simple matter of determining if the event happened as claimed, then ruling out unguided material causes. At thar point, the intervention by an immaterial agent becomes clear.
The universe didn’t come into existence it started to expand….needs clarification. What, exactly, existed prior to the onset of expansion? If, as you claim, the universe aways existed, but at some point 13 TYO “began” to expand, then that leads to the same end result. After all, if all of the matter and energy in the universe existed FOREVER prior to expanding to form our universe, then something OUTSIDE the universe had to intervene to make what had existed for a literal eternity WITHOUT expanding begin to expand. That still requires a beginning caused by an external agency’s involvement. Not even “quantum fluctuations” can save you, because if those fluctuations had failed to cause expansion for an eternity prior, they were incapable of EVER causing inflation. If there was ANY possibility of fluctuations leading to expansion it would have happened an eternity ago.
The whole notion is actually nonsensical.
Dr Carter we love your teaching about how fantastic the Lord is.
An honest look at Evolutionism makes one cry over how incredibly illogical it is. It shows how one small belief thrown in at the beginning can be built upon over decades to produce a theory with no real "legs" to stand on.
Evolutionist or Atheist if you will, will simply deny anything you say cover their ears and eyes and butt hole and go LALALALALALALA!!!
It's embarrassing to even see this on comments and on videos. They have been brainwashed so deeply they simply cant allow for anything else to be true for them. They are dead inside.
@Michael Fritsche The recurring problem is that the peers who review the journal articles have similar bias due to decades of being indoctrinated by our scientific system. This system doesn't encourage questioning evolutionary theory and the data that seems to support it. Michael you can argue that the 550 000 peer reviewed articles seem to support the theory, but I know from experience that nearly all reviewers have bias and are not encouraged to even question the accepted paradigm. The data can be questioned, but the overarching theory isn't called into question. Valid science isn't afraid to question long held theories and should remain open to new, challenging data. Sadly, this is not the way that all scientific disciplines function, in particular evolutionary science. I am skeptical of the theory after 3 and a half decades of studying and teaching it. Instead of throwing ideas like this away as fringe, crazy, non-science, we need to be open to new ideas and encourage scientists to be able to question.
“They are dead inside“ whereas you are
full of fantasies of a supernatural being that you cannot observe, test or perceive
otherwise.
Flawed arguments, revelation, scripture,
tradition, ignorance and as a last straw, pseudo-science intended to reinforce
the believes with scientifically illiterate…That’s all I ever got. Not to
mention that this BS comes from all different religions.
All in all not that impressive.
Evolution is built on a foundation of VERY loose sand.
Ever hear of three D chess? Well he is talking about five hundred level chess. We were modified to fit the mold, by a power beyond what we can imagine. Then just think of Earth, and all the life on it, then think of the universe.... I think I'll take a nap, and dream of it again.
Thank you, and best wishes to all.
I find having large scale dreams like this makes real sleep impossible, I feel like I been running a mile when having lucid dreams of this nature and it happens far too often, and I remember many of them lividly.
GOD IS! CHUCKY D AINT!
Multiple levels of info in the same story. Hey, the Bible is written like that ! 😁😁
Yeah, it depends who reads it
@@andreidibre2289 No, it depends on who _writes_ it.
@Andrei Dibre it does indeed depend on who reads it.....I find it mark of sophisticated writing to have multiple levels of meaning in few simple words.....this allows engagement from readers with different levels of understanding
same author :)
Someone should submit it to peer-review to a biology journal.
Wow! People who are speaking of the magnificence of our Creator’s mighty handy work and acknowledging Him. Give glory to Yahuah! HalleluYah!
jesus kills 25,000 children everyday through his many lethal diseases.
Praise
First time I hear a believer speak about science truthfully while making his religious point, without strawmanning it or mocking it or willfully lying about it
Great job
I've said many times in Sunday School, as people bring up prayer requests for health issues, that we don't realize just how fearfully and wonderfully we are made until we see all the things that can go wrong.
first time for everything... Continue Expanding your intake for more mind-blowing info😅👍
it takes so much more'faith' to believe in evolution than it does to believe in a creator
That's totally incorrect because the two are not mutually exclusive. It takes a *_LACK_* of faith for a Christian to refuse to look for God in evolution. Seek and ye shall find, remember? Evolution is the mechanism by which God Created all this amazing life.
There are many things in the Bible that have not been fully understood until the past few generations. Psalms speaks of pathways in the seas we now know there are ocean currents. The fountains of the deep mentioned in Noah's flood, there are mass amounts of water trapped in the Earth's crust enough to flood the entire Earth. If the laws of gravity were set higher or lower life could not exist anywhere in the universe. Somehow along the way they decided to make Darwin's "theory" of evolution known to the world as a fact and they're still trying to prove it.
God doesnt use random mutations to create life,he creates fully functioning beings,not sure how anyone can come to that conclusion? read the bible.
Amen Jake
@@theTavis01 So please tell us exactly how DNA evolved. Describe in detail the abiogenesis of life. You can not. Thus your belief in those things is faith. The bible clearly teaches that God made man in His image. If the bible is not true, then nothing matters. Christianity's chief cornerstone is Jesus who taught that God made man. If He is a liar then christianity is utter nonsense. If He spoke truth, then one day all will bow the knee before Him. You will bow the knee. If you are christian and believe in evolution, then are you are not born again and you will spend eternity apart from God with your fellow comrades who also call God a liar. My hope for you is that you surrender your life and heart to the Creator whose name is Jesus.
As for me and my house we will serve the Lord! Thank you Jesus!
Your house surely is not a University
Jesus Christ is the truth, and evolution is true. Deal with it.
@@theTavis01 Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life. Facts! Evolution from one kind to another has never been demonstrated. Prove me wrong...
@@yaspereliyahstone5700 You're right about Jesus and wrong about evolution. Can you handle that? Evolution does *_not_* predict a "change of kinds" this is a fake strawman. Evolution predicts the *_diversification_* of "kinds" which happens solely at the species level, and speciation *_has_* been observed.
@@theTavis01 I believe that you are confused about the difference between biological evolution and biological adaptation... May I suggest asking Google for the definitions?
Cheers 🕊️
I marveled at the way things appear throughout the genome and mice embryogenesis for instance. thank you for this revelation about true scientific knowledge.
Chance? Probability? Luck?
Luck, that invisible force that chooses to bless one person and not another?
Eternity is a long time to be wrong.
Well those that believe will live for an eternity where foolish atheist wont...so you ponder that.
Absolutely fascinating mind blowing and faith enhancing. Thank you.
"My ways are higher than your ways, my thoughts higher than your thoughts" - God
God is always in control ---- Praise God
Please state your evidence. There is no evidence of a God, and god, especially a Hebrew God. You might believe the faith is your evidence. Faith is belief without evidence. The Bible might be your evidence. In that case, God spoke ancient Hebrew. God "chose" those Hebrew as his people, not contemporary Americans. Was the Hebrew Bible wrong? Early Christians thought so. Christians changed passages in the bible to support their Christology. Evidence? In Isiah, the Christian, written in Greek, version says the the messiah will be born of a virgin. The original Hebrew says the messiah will be born of a young woman. In Greek culture, miraculous births were a common occurrence in their literature. In Hebrew culture, only post menopausal woman giving birth were examples of miraculous births. Greek speaking Christians changed the text of the Greek Bible to make Mary a Virgin. Gods having sex with mortal women happens all the time. Sons of God is a Greek idea, not Jewish. Christianity is a Hellenistic religion. Jesus was a Torah observing Jew. Virgins so not give birth in the Hebrew Bible, the Torah.
@@markcasebier the evidence of the Creator is every where and you are a piece of it and you know that :) read the Bible please :)
mark casebier ..............................do you know what logic is?
Just because one cannot think of an answer to a question; this doesn't mean there isn't one. It might be out of reach to humans entirely - yet still that doesn't disprove it.
Love you both. If heaven is full of these kinds of people, I know where I wanna go.
Every so often I try to do some research, starting with a web search, _not_ regarding DNA or genes, but about the _interpreter_ of DNA, about how DNA is _deciphered,_ about how genetic information is decoded, and about how that genetic interpreter might have co-evolved with DNA itself, but I've never been successful.
I can't express in words to explain someone who believes everything came from nothing by mere chance and then created all the complexity around us... Billions of elements had to develop completely, at the same instance in time, in order to create even a simple life form... Now those are a gamblers odds... Roll the dice... As the late Kenny Rogers sang, "you got to know when to fold up", "you got to know when to walk away", " you've got to know when to run"... So count your blessings, and remember God created the entire deck by his words... Now that's an "Ace High" in my books...
Man created god by poorly plagiarizing him from a dozen older religions. The Bible is bad fiction, like reading a story where nazis are heroes.
moodist 1er you gonna find out one day and boy will you be wrong.
@@moodist1er proof?
cards are for sinners.
Critical Argument I know I’m right. I know Jesus personally. Got all the proof I need.
"Junk" DNA? Not hardly. God doesn't do junk. This explanation brings "incredible" to a whole new level.
I can watch this a thousand times! Absolutely amazing
Glory to God in the Highest!
Amen! Evolution brings much glory to God.
Alhamdulillah!
Aameen
@@think-islam-channel I suspect you're the one who liked my comment, just for the record, your version of Yahweh is just as unsupported as the Christian one.
@@aspacelex
No it wasn't me who liked your comment.
I don't like comments that are misguided and based on subjective unsubstantiated opinions
I've watched this several times and each time I watch this video I understand a little more. All I can say is that the creative power of GOD added to that of HIS wisdom and I'm just totally blown away by how awesome HE IS. Spending eternity w/HIM learning HIS ways is going to be fun and never ending. Everything about HIM is to vast to be able to measure. We can hardly measure the vastness of the universe w/our knowledge and yet the Lord Himself can measure the universe using just the span of His hand. This is mind blowing. Truly HE is worthy to be praised forever. AMEN !
You have no way of demonstrating
that this God is even real. How about starting with this? Or is your believe in God simply faith based
and your not interested in how things really are? Then anything goes!
@@derhafi do your homework, check out 'Cold Case Christianity', Dr Hugh Ross and Dr James Tour.
@@dawood121derful 'Cold Case Christianity' is intelectual vandalism.
I feel really sorry for you that you listen to those fruds and liars and don't see tham for what they are.
@@derhafi really? and what are you purporting as the the "truth"?
@@dawood121derful The truth is that there is no reason to think that DNA came to be by anything else than natural causes. Simply due to the fact that according to the available evidence, there is nothing else but the natural world. Nothing supernatural has a demonstrable correaltion with reality whatsoever.
The truth is that Tour is a demonstrable liar, so is the entire Discovery Institute ilk. All they do is lie and cater to the emotions of their gullible and scientifically illiterate audience in order to promete creatinism disguised as ID. Which is pseudoscientific nonsese, creationism in a wig.
That is what I propose as the truth according to the available evidence....everything else is wishful thinking.
What a great video. Thank you, Dr. Carter
"For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." Romans 1:20
fossils are included in "what has been made" so evolution glorifies God.
@@theTavis01
A view most likely held only by yourself
@@bobgriffith1810 Look up the BioLogos ministry. It was started by Francis Collins who is head of the NIH and led the Human Genome Project and they share this view with me. And you are making an argumentum ad populum fallacy. Truth has nothing to do with how many people recognize it to be true.
Agree , when we look into the details of creation we can actual see design, as science progress it become obvious that there is a designer , It will become harder and more difficult to deny
@@TonixCube But when design is used as an agument to dishonestly pretend like evolution didn't happen, the concept of design then makes denying Christianity easy and desirable. And if you are going to use that analogy of a designer, evolution is the *_BEST_* evidence of design, since it looks at the process of design and not just the result, and we see evolution in *_ALL_* human designs without exception. Intelligent design is not Christian either, it's a freemason concept being used to weaken Christianty by continuing to further the false belief that evolution and the Bible are somehow allegedly not compatible.
This just nuclear bombed Darwinian evolution theory 🤯
A scientific theory can't be disproven by a kook rambling on youtube.
Not if you know how evolution actually works
@@darkeen42 actually i was going to major in bio. i know how it works... and if you indeed knew how it the classic explanation of the theory you would now know that the complexity invovled just took a significant leap (orders of magnitude) up. The irony is that God has literally shown that one would need trillions of years (not billions) if not more to achieve, through random mutation etc, the genetic system as we now understand it.
@@saved2279 a complexity grows exponentially. The more complexity something has the more opportunities it has to increase its complexity I don't think you went to school for biology
@@saved2279 it sounds like you went to a Christian School who's sole purpose is to twist what we know about reality to fit the Bible to the point of breaking
one of my favorite segments of the movie!
Thank you for sharing!
It is so rewarding, intellectually speaking, to discover these profound mysteries of life - they are important elements that allow us to recognize the extraordinary transcendent Intelligence that created the universe!
I'd love to hear what this doctor thinks about the covid gene shot.
A vile of malevolent poisin I'm sure
Complex systems should not be tampered with
That's it's good since vaccination is good.
@Samuel Lev No Republican president has won the popular vote in 20 years and without voter suppression they wouldn't've won at all. You don't get to deny science at the expense of others' lives in the middle of a pandemic, yes.
pretty sure trump made it
When I took Chemistry, Physics, and Physiology in college 50 years ago, I wondered how any scientist could not believe in a Creator. The order in Creation is mind-boggling.
You should have spent one afternoon learning about epistomology.
I know religious creationism is a lot more reliable !
I don't know about us ever creating something even close to that level of complication. What's he's describing is far beyond that of finite state machines. And that's basically all that we can EVER make as limited as we are and as limited as this universe is. The unseen reality described in Scripture must be awesome indeed.
Yeah. Scripture is awesome. "Earth is centre of the universe" - awesome. Easy to see really, looking up. No wonder the guys who wrote the scripture thought it a safe claim.
Truly! As a molecular biologist, I can vouch for this. Everyday I am marveled at how little the human brain can undertake and perceive this wonder of our genomes.
Darwin honestly didn't know what he was doing. He contradicted himself after his first book. If you read up on his life and stuff, you'll feel silly to believe what he stated.
Also, look at the history of genetics. What we know today is so complex, the older theories are getting outdated.
Darwin thought some one that can after him would fix his theories like filling in holes in Swiss cheese! And our schools have audacity to teach this crock. Darwin is still scratching his head trying to figure out the Cambrian explosion. I suppose Darwin is similar to a single cell organism.
Incredible. I'm going to use this info in one of my articles. I'll put a link to this video. Thanks!
Look up Steven Meyers as well.
This sort of information needs to be brought to the attention of school and university students. Let the product sell itself
Shalom. Alot of what u have said has gone over my head, but that is ok, I'm still learning. Love learning. At last, I hope people will realize how clueless Darwin was. I would have thought, scientists would be the first people to understand, it takes a creator to create anything, even if it is a painting or a sculpture...... let alone living things. Thanks for sharing your wonders with me. Praise be to Heavenly Father for His marvelous, marvelous works 🙂🙏.
The reason most scientists, especially biologists, today don’t see it is because they have been systematically trained NOT to see it. There is a PHILOSOPHY masquerading as “science” that has taken over. That philosophy goes by many names: Philosophical Naturalism, or ontological scientism, or physical reductionism. But they all share one core assumption in common: Only things comprised of matter/energy in spacetime exist. Given that starting assumption, then everything that exists must only be the product of matter/energy interactions in spacetime. Which is why they don’t even allow the notion to be considered that an intelligence guided life. They rule that out. Heck, they even rule out the existence of intelligence itself… at least in terms of saying that we do not even exist as individual self-aware entities. We are nothing more than a collection of memes that we have collected, and those memes merely drive every thought we think we have. Many evolutionary psychologists honestly believe that they don’t exist. That the self is a pure illusion.
@@robertpreisser3547 yes well Christians have failed miserably to proclaim God's glory in evolution, choosing instead to obstinately lie about it, so atheists gladly filled the void with their own philosophies.
@@smitty121981 Well, the issue isn’t really that it’s not possible to come up with a parallel theory where God has guided the development of life from simple to complex, but that is not “Evolution.” Evolution is an umbrellas term that includes any and all naturalistic explanations for life’s development and diversification, but expressly forbids the idea that life is actually designed, and not the product solely of undirected natural processes.
The good news is that naturalistic evolution is a truly falsified theory many times over, speaking from a purely scientific perspective. I can name dozens of explicit predictions made that have been falsified. For just a few examples:
(1) The genetic code would be universally shared by all living organism, because once established mutations to the code itself (NOT mutations to DNA but mutations to how it is interpreted by the cellular machinery) will be invariably harmful. This was a direct prediction by Sir Francis Cook, and has been proven false. There are 24 known variants on the universal genetic code.
(2) That the fossil record would be filled in with the literally millions of predicted transitional forms showing a gradual transition between common ancestors and descendant new species. In all the time since more species have been discovered in the fossil record without any transitional fossils connecting them to any ancestor. The fossil record shows the opposite pattern than what was predicted: species appearing all at once fully formed and remaining static until going extinct.
(3) That highly complex organs or coordinated integrated behaviors involving numerous organs (e.g, echolocation) would be inherited from a common ancestor as the odds of such complex integrated systems arising by undirected mutations more than once was recognized as being prohibitively low. And yet there are many examples of highly complex systems and behaviors arising in diverse species long after they supposedly diverged from their last common ancestor.
(4) That millions of years is more than enough time for species to diverge and grow in complexity. However, the time it takes to fix nucleotides in a species’ population has been calculated multiple times in various ways, and even the most pro-evolution figures are still prohibitively long. For example, for hominids alone the time to fix just two mutations exceeds the time available, and our DNA differs from chimpanzees by literally millions of nucleotides, not just two.
(5) The mechanisms of random mutations acted on by selection can produce all of the complex systems used by life. However the cell alone is full of numerous complex systems that all work together to provide a selectable benefit (and even to keep the cell alive) that could not have arisen by a succession of smaller mutations. The electron transport complexes I - IV and ATPSynthase all work together and if any piece is not only present, but extremely tightly designed, the cell cannot metabolize carbohydrates and in turn produce ATP used by all other energy-dependent processes.
These are just a few of the most recent articles coming out of the scientific community that have convinced me that the theory is not scientifically supported. More importantly, that the very same evidence points strongly to actual and not apparent design of life.
And so you can reconcile the progression of life from simple to complex with the guidance and direction of God, absolutely. But Evolution itself is explicitly a naturalistic theory that forbids up front any actual design or any designer.
@@robertpreisser3547 "But Evolution itself is explicitly a naturalistic theory that forbids up front any actual design or any designer." That's not true, and it's a completely faulty premise. Psalm 139 tells us that God knit us together in our mother's womb. Must we then be compelled to deny the science of gestation since the science of gestation is looking at the naturalistic mechanisms??? That's your exact logic, and if you don't equally apply it in both circumstances your argument is proven to be invalid. Obviously both Psalm 139 and the science of gestation are true. They are looking at and describing the exact same phenomenon, yet do so in completely different ways. Atheists will argue that the science of gestation proves it to be a meaningless random process. Should we just throw up our hands in defeat? Shrink in terror from any talk of embryonic development? Tell boldface lies about a sperm and egg? Or should we, as Christians, proclaim the ways in which the science of gestation reveals God's glory? Hmm..... tough one...... does God want us to act like liars and idiots or does God want us to glorify Him..... hmmmm......I guess I'll need to pray for discernment! LOL
1) "The genetic code would be universally shared by all living organism" The genetic code *_IS_* shared. You appear to not be up to date on the science. If I'm not mistaken (you gave no reference) your figure of 24 "separate" groups comes from a study which looked at the genetic sequence of a single protein, done for a whole range of organisms, and then comparing the results. It's worth noting that this paper made divisions among prokaryotes and still classified all eukaryotes as having a single common ancestor. (ooops!). A newer study, which looked at 16 proteins rather than just one, was able to do a much higher resolution comparison and concluded that indeed all of life shares genetic descent and they were able to sort through the prokaryotes with incredible detail. You can read this research by searching for a paper titled "A New View of the Tree of Life" which is available in full for free online. Also, it's quite notable that you presented the 24 separate ancestry hypothesis as if it were settled science even though it was only ever presented in a single paper that was later refuted, you apparently didn't actually read it, and you made this claim while simultaneously crapping on nearly all settled science in regards to evolution as if it can't be trusted. Ever heard of a thing called "confirmation bias"? You're drenched in it.
2) The fossil record *_IS_* full of transitional forms. Evolution happens with a tempo of punctuated equilibrium. New species emerge rapidly and then enter relative stasis for long period of time. The broad development of body plans over long periods of time is excruciatingly well documented with countless transitional forms. The place in which transitions are generally lacking is in the rapid emergence events. When we look at human technology, like a telephone, we see a clear series of transitional fossils as the phone evolved from a giant wooden box to a rotary phone to a touchtone phone to a smart phone. Each form rapidly emerged and then entered relative stasis. There are not a million half rotary half touchtone phones gradually going from one to another. So the fact that we see this in both technology and the fossil record is simultaneously evidence for both evolution and God. Because, like I said, evolution glorifies God.
"The fossil record shows the opposite pattern than what was predicted" wait.... so because a human prediction was wrong, that suddenly means that we can throw out all of the evidence? That's not honest. A scientific paper studying the evolution of human technology made the exact same error: "The results contradict the prediction of a single S-curve. Instead, technological evolution seems to follow a step function, with sharp improvements in performance following long periods of no improvement." Does the fact that the prediction was wrong magically negate the fact that the technology evolved? No, not at all, and no one would ever make such a claim.
3) you're arguing against a strawman. The current scientific consensus is that "such complex integrated systems arising by undirected mutations" is NOT possible and scientists are currently looking into other areas like epigenetics. However, the question as to HOW evolution happened has no bearing whatsoever as to the fact THAT is happened. "A central challenge in evolutionary biology concerns the mechanisms by which complex adaptations arise... what looks like an optimal organism design may not be attainable by a series of adaptive mutations.” Nature Microbiology 2018
4) "That millions of years is more than enough time for species to diverge and grow in complexity" wait....wait.... so a million years isn't enough time according to you.... and yet you're going to tell me with a straight face that even with millions of years not being enough time for God, you have no logical problem whatsoever with animals and plants all magically poofing into existence fully formed in a single instant? Cool story bro. If God can do it instantly, God can do it over time too. And again, your "math" is based on the flawed assumption that point mutations are the sole driver of evolution, an idea which has been criticized in the peer reviewed literature for well over 40 years now, and is also an idea that is totally incompatible with God so it makes no sense for you to adopt it. "We argue that the basic neo-Darwinian framework-the natural selection of random mutations-is insufficient to account for evolution... We propose, therefore, that the intrinsic dynamical structure of the epigenetic system itself, in its interaction with the environment, is the source of NON-random variations which DIRECT evolutionary change" Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1979
5) As soon as you drop the "random" strawman you will see that evolution is the STRONGEST evidence of design, since it looks at the process and not just the end result, and the human technological record bears all the salient characteristics of the biological fossil record, including a) microevolution b) macroevolution c) inheritance and diversification forming nested hierarchies d) development over time through modifications made subject to selection forces e) punctuated equilibirum
@@smitty121981 Your Paragraph 2
//The fossil record IS full of transitional forms.//
Depends on what you mean by “full.” Remember, the theory predicted there would be transitional forms between every single extant species, showing a gradual transition from one species to the next. Yes, there would be some gaps in the fossil record due to the nature of the conditions needed to fossilize animals, but Darwin predicted that future discoveries would continually fill in the gaps in the record. The opposite has actually happened. We have seen the majority of all of the major body plans arising all at once in the fossil record during the Cambrian period, without any transitional forms or clear predecessors in the Pre-Cambrian period. And yet, there are fossils in those layers. This is actually what is well documented. In fact, this is what led Stephen Jay Gould to propose the theory of Punctuated Equilibrium, to explain why the fossil record did NOT show the gradual transitions from ancestor species to descendant species that was predicted.
In fact, the picture painted by genetics doesn’t actually support a picture of gradualism, as mentioned above in the quote from Gerd Muller’s paper. *Gradualism:* “When mutation of individual genes or even smaller entities of DNA is taken as the predominant source of variation, it seemed inevitable that phenotypic modifications should be small, because larger changes were deemed to be disruptive and unlikely to produce adaptive outcomes. The supposed randomness of genetic variation further contributed to this view. Today, all of these cherished opinions have to be revised, not least in the light of genomics, which evokes a distinctly non-gradualist picture [40]. “
And so we really have a catch-22, here. If you want to claim that the fossil record is full of transitional fossils, then that is not what the modern genetics would predict.
If we don’t have transitional fossils, then gradualism is itself falsified, but that is still part of the Modern Synthesis view.
Either way, the fossil record itself paints the exact opposite picture of Darwin’s branching tree of life from “one or a few forms” into all extant species. The Cambrian Explosion turns that on its head and shows novel body plans coming into existence without prior transitional forms.
//Wait, because a human prediction was wrong, that suddenly means we can throw out all of the evidence?//
You have raised a Straw Man, here, in two ways:
(1) First by saying I’m talking about a “human” prediction. I am not. I am talking about the necessary consequences that flow from the truth or falsity of a given theory.
Heliocentrism was adopted over Geocentrism because the latter made certain predictions that did not align with observations. However, it took centuries to do this because rather than throwing out Ptolemaic Geocentrism, they just kept adding ad hoc assumptions (in the form of additional Epicycles) to account for literally any possible stellar and planetary motion. In the same way, any time we don’t find what we ought to find if a given theory is actually true, we can do one of two things:
(a) Add more assumptions or corollaries to make the theory align with observations better, or
(b) Replace the theory with an alternative explanation that does account for the new evidence better.
But what we can’t do is ignore the evidence that contradicts what we ought to see if the theory were actually true. That is not scientific.
(2) The second way you are raising a straw man is in saying “we can throw out all the evidence.”
What does falsification mean to you, as Karl Popper proposed as a key to formulating proper scientific theories such that are capable of being proven false?
Falsification to me is exactly what I have described:
Theory A, if true, predicts that we will find certain evidence, and that we will NOT find other evidence that directly undermines the theory.
When we don’t find the evidence the theory predicts, but do find the evidence that directly contradicts what the theory predicted, then we do throw out the THEORY, but not the EVIDENCE.
Well, “throw out” is probably a bit strong. At the very least, we DO need to re-evaluation the assumptions and mechanisms of that particular theory whose predictions have been falsified. At the very least, the THEORY must be reworked to account for the new EVIDENCE that directly contradicts it.
Darwin said: If simple cells we observe have complexity, my theories break down.
God bless you guys !
I think this one is my favorite ❤️
The KJV states that, "In the beginning ( time) God ( First Cause) created ( effect ) the heaven ( space) and the earth ( matter).
And the earth was without form. and void.
And the Spirit of God ( Life Giver) moved ( energised) upon the face of the waters.
And God said, "Let there be light ( energy), and there was light!" Genesis 1:1-3 True Science in a nutshell!
Indeed yet somehow atheist just cant seem to comprehend this...because they never even honestly researched it, they are too lazy they rather they be told what to do.
Sure, what else? Should I use Happy
Potter to verify that Hogwarts is a real place?
@@darthbane2669 Actually, as an atheist myself growing up my position was largely due to Christians insisting that evolution isn't compatible. I said, OK, well I don't have any use for the Bible then. You say "because they never even honestly researched it, they are too lazy they rather they be told what to do" and that is an *_EXCELLENT_* description of young earth evolution deniers.
@@theTavis01 would you like to show an example of marco evolution please?
@@x.r.d7744 Is your google broken?
"I will praise you; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvelous are your works; and that my soul knows right well. " Psalm 139:14
All creation and life is Glory to God. No matter how undeniably obvious his work becomes as our puny minds start to understand the little we do about life, there will always be those that just hate God and will never see or believe it.
Brilliant, thank you.
It requires a lot more faith to believe in evolution then it does to accept our amazing creator. May God bless humanity and may humanity bless God always and forever.
That's total nonsense. It does *_NOT_* take faith to admit evolution is real, because we can see fossils first hand. There is mountains of actual physical evidence for evolution, unlike God who no man has ever seen. Secondly, *_WHAT'S WRONG WITH FAITH????_* Why do you act like something requiring faith is a measure of it's weakness??? I really don't like what that says about Christianity.
@@theTavis01 Actually, is does take Faith to believe in evolution. Evolution suggests an ape mutated into a human...of course at the same time...an ape of the opposite sex also mutated and produced the human race. Yet, over the last 6000 observed years, we do not have apes mutating. I might add, you can't see the wind, but I'm going to assume you believe it exists. You only feel and and see the effects of the wind. Faith- the substance of things hoped for, and the evidence of things not seen. Kinda like the missing links (plural) in evolution.
@@ginadorsey8270 You've obviously never studied evolution at all. And, like I asked above, *_WHAT'S WRONG WITH FAITH??_*
That was really cool!!!
This was my favorite part of an amazing film!
I am so happy I have a personal relationship with the Creator
He is My Father
and these two guys are blown away
😂😂😂😂😂
To my mind only an incredible, infinite God could do this. Glory to His name.
Your mind filling gaps in your knowledge with some God idea....is not prove for any God.
@@derhafi filling gaps 😭😂? What are you even referring to? After analyzing the video the human genome’s complexity is a plethora of evidence for a creator
@@Yeshuas_emulator Complexity is not the halllmark of Design. Let alone is complexitx on nature evidence for some fallacious God assumption with no demonstrable correaltion with reality.
I wonder if the universe is actually set up in some ways similar to the cell.
Yes it is. It has to be to continue to provide the elements we need.
Love the insight you give us of the Omnesience of our Creator. God's folly (as if He had any) is far far greater than man's wisdom! The complexities increase exponentially with each demension of life's basic factors. This should be taught in schools and especially Sunday School.
Computer programming can really give you an appreciation of the designs of God. Like how you can have just a few simple commands that do the most insignificant little things, but when you put them together you can do amazing things and even create whole worlds. Modern programmers having to build a forest don't spend time designing each leaf; they just use fractals to create extremely realistic looking natural plant growth!
One simple rule to live by, "Never believe you know everything, for the intelligents and understanding of all physical beings is limited."
I've heard of our bodied being compared to computers before, but I never took that a step further to consider how a computer would function from an evolutionary standpoint. Very interesting perspective, thanks!
computers clearly evolved over time. There has been a drastic change from an old server taking up an entire warehouse, to a supercomputer in your pocket, with a series of well defined transitional forms inbetween, developed through a process of modifications subject to selection
Algorithms based on evolution are used to generate new designs.
It would take millions of miracles for evolution to be true. God created all things....
Rubytuby straight up!
Miracles are unproven, subjective phenomena. Evolution is about what we observe in nature
ptango101 no what we see in nature are abstract patterns and data points. Evolution is what you infer from that data.
@@STAR-RADIANCE If I accept the evidence that is "inferred" from the data then what is intelligent design?
ptango101 intelligent design is an inference from the data and is also used to describe the patterns observed
in nature
Thanks: I have learned so
Much in a few minutes 👍
Thank you for these extended talks, there’s things in them that bring so much glory to God. They have helped me to be amazed at our Lords glory in creation.
This is fascinating. Thanks for this.
Really uplifting content
Beautiful testimony at the end!
When real scientist talk I understand them clearly.. when Pseudo atheistic science talks it;s all mumbo jumbo and we are told only clever scientists can understand it? so I become to thick.... I like these scientists as they speak clearly and show the Obvious.
What a great resource to draw from ... thank you for the effort that went into this.
Your inability to grasp science is
not a valid argument against it.
best commenton this thread. yes, because atheists' minds are dark and they can't really explain anything but seek to imitate light to deceive people
Mind blown! 🤯
Mind blowing! God is so amazing! 🙌🏻🙏🏻💪🏼
What a beautiful interview, thank you, I am Jewish and sat in some talks by great rabbis in Jerusalem 40 years ago, they had reasoned things like this and came to exactly the same conclusions, evolution says we evolved and the fittest were successful, how did we evolve with half an eye ? thank you
Blows evolution,right out of the water,doesn't it?!....(We're not quite as smart as God....love it!.)
This is Beyond Beautiful. The Most High geometry is magnificent!!!!!
Simply amazing
“For you produced my kidneys;You kept me screened off in my mother’s womb. 14 I praise you because in an awe-inspiring way I am wonderfully made.Your works are wonderful,I know this very well. 15 My bones were not hidden from youWhen I was made in secret,When I was woven in the depths of the earth. 16 Your eyes even saw me as an embryo;All its parts were written in your bookRegarding the days when they were formed,Before any of them existed.” Psalm 139:13
It's like we are each the internet of all things where everything is connected yet individuals....
Hmmm???
The question is are you plugged in to the Body of Christ who is very much alive, who is the Wisdom of God the Father -or- the Body of the Beast..the collective consciousness of men, dead in trespasses and sin..unbelief!
when i consider DNA, how amazing it is, and think that it has undergone 5880 years of degeneration and damage but still manages to function enough for a person to develop and live some 80 years, i am astounded at the prospect of what adam must have been. what glorious ruins we are! there is no question that god made adam and eden with biology that could have lived forever, Adam was tall, strong, flexible, ultra intelegent, easthetically stunning, and unimaginably joyfull. i imagine that if he was to walk among us nowdays, some would probably fall down and worship him.
Hey Nosegrind... that is very interesting. I've never heard the phrase "glorious ruins."
@@criticalargument8667 does carbon dating work on living things?
Some would say Adam was the smartest man in the world...
@@shredhed572 radiocarbon analysis can tell you how many carbon 14 atom are in a sample. the rest is up to interpretation.
@@criticalargument8667 May God richly bless you.
Newton observed the tight design of matter and came up with a theory about God's handiwork. He was able to find the repeating patterns which became Laws of Physics. This Doctor Carter explains it very well. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for the explanations and intelligent discussion.
God is likely active at every stage, at all times.
The mind boggling complexity of all creation makes me wonder whether what we perceive as 'the physical' actually exists. The 'physical' seems like an oversimplification of reality, tiny little models of 'reality' that we have built in our mind's eye.
Underlying the wonderful biochemistry of life is the mysterious construction of the atoms themselves. How could anyone know (or preplan) what unique properties would emerge from various combinations of atoms?
The wisdom of GOD !! What an awesome eternity future it will be as we learn "the ways" of our GOD. It will never end. IT'S ALMOST TIME TO SOUND THE TRUMPETS AND AT LAST GO HOME !!
@@criticalargument8667 No, it was created in a lab by satans puppets, the NWO.
@@x-popone6817 hahahahahahh good one man. Oh crap I think he is serious!
@@criticalargument8667 NO, "so-called critical thinking wise men" made it in a lab.
@@criticalargument8667 The bioweapon is not used against another country... it's against the people. Watch David Icke on London Real where he talks about why they did this.
@@criticalargument8667 I knew you would use that strawman argument, just because he believes in lizard people doesnt dismiss his arguments about coronavirus, i dont believe in lizard people.
It's not even the step up theory that is the most absurd to believe in, but the idea that it came about through a random chance process, leading to order, without any intelligent design or Designer.
And there are mad scientists who play around with this stuff and try to rewrite it...
ie.. the new "vaccine" and "crispr"
This is the reason why we can only speculate on the possible effects of the mRNA vaccines. Computermodels, petri dishes, hybrid animals with no intact immune system, etc. Howfar will the genome change when we reproduce and will it have an even greater effect on tje 3rd and 4th generation? What will the longterm effects be and why MUST everybody be vaxxed?
Love it. God is reveiling himself. It reminds me, what the first verses in Psalm 2 are saying:
Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain?
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together,
against the Lord and against his Anointed, saying,
“Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.”
He who sits in the heavens laughs;the Lord holds them in derision.
To fight against God is fighting a loosing battle. The Devil himself tried it and haven´t realized yet, that he has allready lost.
I rejoice in my saviour and my redeemer Jesus Christ. In him and through him all things where created. For his and his father glory.
Wow! Wonderful, I wish every evolutionist would watch this.
Thank you, God! True science, science based on the examination of material evidence, is daily, little stroke by little stroke, felling the oak of evolution (a.k.a., science falsely so-called), an atheistic, naturalistic, uniformitarian model for the origin of the universe and of life. One day the theory of evolution/abiogenesis will be consigned to the dustbin of history, where it belongs.
Evolution is very real though, defining evolution as atheistic just to deny it is a strawman fallacy. You should be looking for God in evolution. Seek, and yet shall find.
@@theTavis01 Actually, evolution -- macroevolution -- is not "real though." The Bible states flora and fauna shall reproduce "according to their kinds," which is exactly what we see. Evolution rejects this and states there are no kinds, but that all life has a common ancestor. The two models are diametrically opposed, as both evolutionists and creationists know. (Only compromising theistic evolutionists don't know this.) Btw, Bill, where is this mythical common ancestor with which you claim God began life? You say God used evolution? Then, please, trace for me in minute detail how rabbits and rhubarb are related? No? What about grapes and gorillas? No? How about squid and squash? No? Walnuts and walruses then? If what you're saying is true, we should be able to show empirically how these pairs are related. No, Bill, if you believe the Bible supports evolution, your exegesis is woefully poor. For example, the Bible states God formed man from the dust of the ground, not after millions of years of primate evolution. You, Bill, should be reading your Bible far more carefully, looking for God's nature in His word, instead of spending your time conjuring ways to make a square peg fit into a round hole.
@@profoundgreetingsfromneptune You don't get to decide for yourself what is true. The scientific literature is very clear that evolution happened. There are hundreds of millions of fossils that can only possibly be explained through evolution, and this is now being strongly corroborated by modern genetics research.
your claim that evolution "states there are no kinds" is totally ridiculous. The scientific taxonomy identifies various "kinds" to a very high degree of specificity. And evolution directly predicts that new species arise within their "kind" so I have no idea what you're blathering about. We know that dolphins evolved from land animals, specifically because they are *_STILL_* the same mammal "kind" even though they now live in the ocean. They didn't magically become fish, they stayed firmly within their "kind". That's why they have lungs and have to come up for air, they have hip bones even though they don't have legs, and they nurse their young with milk.
"as both evolutionists and creationists know" That's right. Creationists are in full agreement with atheists and it's horrifying. Real Christians look for God in all things, including evolution. Seek and ye shall find is what Jesus said.
"What about grapes and gorillas?" Scientifically, the commonality is DNA. Duh. Biblically the commonality is God the Creator. Duh. I really don't see what you are trying to get at? You seem to think you have some sort of clever "gotcha" moment but I'm not sure you've thought it through. The cells in your body were all made by God. Your brain cells are totally different from your muscle cells, which are totally different from your blood cells, which are totally different from your skin cells, which are totally different from your bone cells, etc. Each cell can only produce more cells of the same kind. A muscle cell can only make new muscle cells, and never anything else. And yet all of these vastly different cell types created by God all trace their heritage directly and undenialby back to one single cell in the womb. So a diversity of features in no way whatsoever rules out a common ancestor, nor does it exclude God from evolution, since we know that God created us individually that very same way, from a single cell on upwards.
"your exegesis is woefully poor" *_SO YOU MAINTAIN THAT THE EARTH IS FLAT??_* Serious question. Because if you believe in a scientific spherical planet in a solar system I'm about to wreck your world, son. It is *_IMPOSSIBLE_* to read Genesis and arrive at a 6000 year old spherical earth. There is no possible hermeneutic by which you can arrive at that conclusion. You cannot insist upon a super ultraliteral 24 hour "day" but then be totally lax and allow for "firmament" to be a poetically symbolic representation of a spherical gaseous atmosphere. So if you want to talk exegesis you can begin be defending your own position!
"the Bible states God formed man from the dust of the ground" That's right it does! And that is a beautifully poetic, appropriately succinct, and scientifically accurate description of evolution. How marvelous that God described evolution so perfectly in the Bible. You, on the other hand, seem to think that a God without a body somehow ultraliterally made a sculpture out of clay??? And how was an incorporeal God walking?? So many things wrong with insisting upon ultraliteralism.
" instead of spending your time conjuring ways to make a square peg fit into a round hole." You mean like trying to squeeze a young earth into the Bible? Totally.
2 Peter 3:8 explicitly tells us that God's days are much much longer than human days. End of discussion. (as if the round earth wasn't enough)
@@theTavis01 Correction: your atheistic, materialistic, uniformitarian masters don't get to determine what is true for themselves. The atheistic scientific literature denies the existence of God, and your inability to see this is lamentable. Evolution happened, did it? Do tell, do tell, Bill: where is the theory's mythical common ancestor? You evolutionists have had over 160 years to produce this common ancestor. Where is it ... son? Hundreds of millions of fossils -- what a joke. Where are your billions of transitional forms? And please don't embarrass yourself by bringing up any of the myriad hoaxes your atheist masters used to corroborate their theory. Where is your common ancestor?
Yes, the theory of evolution must posit that there are no kinds since there is a common ancestor for all of life. No, neither dolphins nor whales evolved from land animals. The "pelvic" bone to which you are referring is used for sex ... son. Just because dolphins are mammals according to human taxonomy doesn't mean they evolved from land animals. Please, tell me you know this. God created animals with hair that are land dwelling, sea dwelling, and that fly, and He doesn't classify creatures as man does. That doesn't mean bats evolved from land animals ... son. Where is your empirical data to prove bats, dolphins, and whales evolved from land animals? Where are the billions and billions of transitional forms that show this evolution, and how do you know any one of these fossils procreated?
No, you compromising theistic evolutionists are the only ones that don't get it. That's what's so horrifying ... and sad. Do you not understand the theory of evolution states the sun preceded the earth, yet that the Bible states God created the sun on day four? Do you not understand the theory of evolution states birds evolved from land animals, that "dolphins evolved from land animals," yet that the Bible states birds and sea dwelling creatures were created on day five and land animals were created on day six? Do you not understand the God of the Bible is a God of life, not death; that He doesn't make mistakes/need trial and error and billions of years of death, disease, and suffering to create life's myriad more complex forms? He is the Word: He simply speaks, and creation obeys His voice ... immediately. Do you not understand that creation was a miracle? When have you ever known God to need billions of years to perform a miracle? Your exegesis is rank, compromised garbage ... son.
No, son, DNA is not the commonality between grapes and gorillas. Wrong. Wrong answer. DNA demonstrates a common Designer. In order for you to prove common ancestry, you need to whip out one of your millions of fossils you claim "proves evolution" and trace in minute detail how this single common ancestor led to the arrival of both grapes and gorillas, rabbits and rhubarb, walnuts and walruses, squids and squash ... son. Gotcha! I don't think you've thought this through. The only way you can "get me" is if you show, using empirical data, the link between albacore and albatrosses. I'll wait.
Btw, the fossil record -- animals are not in the proper "order," dinosaur graveyards, polystrate fossils, fossils of aquatic life found on mountain tops, fossils of clams in the closed position, sedimentary layers and sequences -- support creation and a worldwide flood, not your religion of evolution.
God has ruled Himself out from evolution, as any proper reading of the Bible demonstrates. He is a God of life, not of death; He doesn't need to use death to create life, and indeed the Bible tells us He didn't use millions of years of death to create life. He speaks, and creation obeys immediately. The days in Genesis 1 are literal days. It is not being "ultraliteral"; it is simply reading the text in context. Whenever the word "yom" is used in the Bible and it is accompanied by "evening" and "morning" and/or an ordinal number, it always means a literal, 24-hour day. This occurs myriad times in the Bible. No, when the Bible states God formed man from the dust of the ground, it is a literal recounting of what actually happened. Please, watch the recent video dated 10/2/20 featuring Dr. Steven Boyd that can be found on this channel. Dr. Boyd did a statistical analysis and proved that Genesis 1-11 is historical narrative, not poetry. According to the Jewish calendar, the year is 5780, so either the original Jews and we creationists are wrong, or you theistic evolutionists are. Did you really just say God needs physical hands to shape the dust of the ground? Wow, your god is feeble. You probably don't believe in the Noachian flood. If you don't believe that, how can you believe in the parting of the Red Sea or a Messiah who can walk on water?
Don't come at me with that flat earth mumbo jumbo. This channel just put out a video refuting this on 10/16/20. No, a biblically correct exegesis does not support a flat earth, so I'm not sure what you're blathering about here. But you tried it.
@@profoundgreetingsfromneptune "The atheistic scientific literature denies the existence of God" Oh really? Please show me the actual scientific literature to which you are referring. Just give me the name of 2 or 3 peer reviewed journal papers so
i can check up on your claim.
"Do you not understand that creation was a miracle?" Yes. Totally 100%. And evolution is the study of this miracle. Some people like you though, want to reduce that miracle to a little kid's cartoon. SMH.
"the theory of evolution must posit that there are no kinds" That is totally dishonest, and I despise that so many Christian use "kinds" as such a weasel word. It's totally sickening. "Kind" in the Bible obviously is analogous to the scientific taxonomy, which evolution *_CERTAINLY_* employs. You are doing what many other liars do, which is you attempt to define evolution in a way in which you feel justified denying it. That's called straw man fallacy. Yes, the pelvic bone is involved in reproduction, because that is where the baby is gestated. However, the primary function for a pelvis is the attachment of legs, and plenty of ocean life gets on just fine reproducing without a pelvis. Also, it is *_NOT_* just comparative anatomy that shows us that cetaceans evolved from land mammals, it is *_ALSO_* that pesky fossil record that you love to lie about. What does God say about bearing false witness??? academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/51/12/1037/223993
"Do you not understand the theory of evolution states the sun preceded the earth" Yep. You are totally insane. Confirmed. Evolution is actually a theory about biology, specifically the origin of species. It has nothing to do with the creation of the sun or earth. But as a dishonest denier living in fairy tale land, you just make up everything as you go along.
you claim "animals are not in the proper 'order,'" in the fossils, but you forgot to back this up with an actual reference. Oops. Please tell me where I can read about the astounding discovery of human skeletons mixed in with dinosaur bones because they all got swept up in the same giant tidal wave. Surely that is a common occurrence. I must have somehow missed the research literature on it, maybe you can point me in the right direction, since you're such an "expert"
"Did you really just say God needs physical hands to shape the dust of the ground? " No, I said that's what your insane ultraliteralism -*REQUIRES.*_ Almost every ancient religion has mankind created by a corporeal deity that literally sculpts them from clay. If this is *_NOT_* how you think it is happening in the Bible 1) you are *_NOT_* being consistent with your hermeneutics, and 2) What, specifically, was happening instead according to you???
"Don't come at me with that flat earth mumbo jumbo" Oh, the poor little baby can't defend his pathetic hermeneutic. Go cry me a river and sail away on it til you fall off the edge of your flat earth. Genesis 1:7 is very clear that the earth is flat and if you say otherwise *_YOU"RE CALLING GOD A LIAR_* (according to your own trusty "logic")
DR CARTER IS BRILLIANT!!!
Darwin assumed that the first organism was ‘simple’. I think that his definition of simple can in no way be related to what we know about single cell organisms. These are so complex already, that this can never just ‘emerge’ from somewhere. Looking how conmolex DNA is make it highly unlikely. Adding the requirements for how DNA is assembled and the circumstances it needs to remain stable and folds properly, makes it completely impossible to ‘emerge’ out of nowhere.
You know what is not simple? A God. How did that God thing came into
existence?
@@derhafi For anything to exist, something had to always exist, to have the power of existence in itself. That's what eternal means, as opposed to merely infinite or unending: God always existed, beyond even anything for "always" to describe.
@@KalonOrdona2 For something to exist.... It needs a demonstrable correlation with reality. No God proposal ever managed to present any sufficient evidence in that regard.
@@derhafi Hello Rob,....You will find that reading HIS word....the fulfilled prophesy, the ability to applied it today, the clear knowledge of the evil in the heart of man and how it got there. The real Christian challenges and questions but doesn't go to "the world" for the answer. You will never find it there.....
@@TheGravitywerks You sir, with all respect this deserves…none…believe in nonsense.
It takes a lot of 'faith' to believe that random natural processes could luckily create a stable universe from nothing then fill it with complex living machines. Believing in God seems like basic common sense by comparison, its only challenging because we live in fallen world where deception is being thrown at us constantly. Thank God for this series and the work of scientists like Dr Carter, Stephen Myers and others.
...Why atheists think the amoeba made this all happen "accidentally" I will never know......
Why you think that anyone thinks that, will also remain a mystery…...
Why Christians can't see that evolution is how God creates I will never know....
@@theTavis01 ....Small changes of a single cell ancestor...over billions of years...is not what the records shows happened. That is what "evolution" and Darwin say happened...The record shows an 'explosion' of life, not an amoeba slowly figuring out how to make a hemoglobin molecule...God causing an eruption, immediate and abrupt is not "evolution"....
@@LonskiBig You are playing word games, and it's not honest. Evolution is undeniably real.
@@theTavis01 ...They can't even define the word. The definition floats & bobs between scientists. It's nonexistent when you can't even define it.....
Not only did God not create us, God upkeeps us. He didn't just set up the universe, give it laws and let it alone to do its thing. He literally keeps us growing and living. How else can DNA do that? How can something smaller than a cell have intelligence to react to what is necessary at that level of complication? Wow.
Yes. There will come a day where the origin of life will be perfectly associated to intelligence.
I hope ASI - Artificial Superintelligence won’t be able to write codes in the dynamic programming level.
i watch this and get an intensity of love for the CREATOR!!
YAHWEH (Jehovah) be PRAISED!!!!
There are experiments that suggest happiness and sadness can affect the pactness of DNA strands. The pactness refers to how DNA folds tightly/loosly to hinder/facilitate replication and reprogramming.