Sufficient Statistics and the Factorization Theorem

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 мар 2024
  • This video teaches you all about sufficient statistics - what they are, why they're important and useful, and how to find them using the factorization theorem, with examples for the Binomial and Poisson distribution.

Комментарии • 36

  • @charlesSTATS
    @charlesSTATS Месяц назад

    I love how you put the context of sufficiency in real life chance events. Thank you for this gold video!

  • @ops428
    @ops428 Месяц назад

    I'm glad I found your channel. I have never seen a better explanation of mathematical statistics, nobody else is even close! You are doing an amazing job there

  • @phillipmunkhuwa5435
    @phillipmunkhuwa5435 Месяц назад

    Great explanation

  • @qkdnrnskfirnsvabk
    @qkdnrnskfirnsvabk 2 месяца назад

    Thanks for the straightforward explanation!! Now I can understand why "sufficient" is sufficient!

  • @user-ps6vx8xr6l
    @user-ps6vx8xr6l 4 месяца назад

    Thank you very much!!!
    Very clear, usefull and understandable

  • @RoyalYoutube_PRO
    @RoyalYoutube_PRO 14 дней назад

    3:04 I love how he describe the indepence of these samples by talking about the coins coming from '3 sets of 10 flips' ... this ensures that the second sample isn't reliant on the first and the third sample isn't reliant on the second and first and so on... in other words, the samples are independent
    If the samples were taken from a single set of binomial, the probabilty of success of second flip as well as first flip is dependent on success or fail of first sample

    • @briangreco2718
      @briangreco2718  14 дней назад

      To be clear, we are still assuming all the 30 flips are independent and have the same probability of heads - we are just changing how summarize the data. Whether we talking about each flip individually, 3 sets of 10, or 1 set of 30, all 30 coin flips are independent.

  • @jwbpark
    @jwbpark Месяц назад

    you are a genius

  • @dolynk
    @dolynk 3 месяца назад

    This is a great, intuitive explanation. Thanks!

  • @DonFranciscoUSF
    @DonFranciscoUSF 4 месяца назад

    This is a fantastic explanation, clear, simple, and short :)

  • @yasamanboroon-zn2lu
    @yasamanboroon-zn2lu 2 месяца назад +1

    It was awesome please continue 🔥

  • @awongiwengxanga7196
    @awongiwengxanga7196 4 месяца назад

    Thank you!

  • @maryziperman4410
    @maryziperman4410 2 месяца назад

    thank you soooooo much. this was so helpful for my college final in mathematical statistics at Texas a&m!!!! you are incredibly gifted!

  • @raltonkistnasamy6599
    @raltonkistnasamy6599 2 месяца назад

    thank u so much man u explained it so so well

  • @TaoLeaf
    @TaoLeaf 4 месяца назад

    Keep up the good work!

  • @ashsingh2175
    @ashsingh2175 3 месяца назад

    great!

  • @aldenc.9461
    @aldenc.9461 2 месяца назад

    Really impressed with your videos, keep on making more!

  • @raltonkistnasamy6599
    @raltonkistnasamy6599 2 месяца назад

    thank u thank u thank u

  • @matteomorellini5974
    @matteomorellini5974 4 месяца назад

    Thanks for the video, I'm not grasping only one concept: why is the summation of X_i sufficient in the binomial case (I assume this means we won't need the number of trials)? Shouldn't we know the number of successes with respect to the total trials? For example of course the summation of X_i = 3 where n=5 and where n=100 should give different probabilities

    • @briangreco2718
      @briangreco2718  4 месяца назад +1

      Yes, you're totally correct. We do need to know the number of trials, but that's usually known to us already, so in that case the # of successes is equivalent to the proportion of successes because we can just divide by the (already known) number of trials. (If the number of trials were *also* an unknown parameter that we were trying to learn about, then the number of successes alone would not be sufficient for learning about the probability of success). Let me know if that makes sense or if I can try to clarify further.

    • @matteomorellini5974
      @matteomorellini5974 4 месяца назад

      @@briangreco2718 yep that's more than 🥁🥁🥁sufficient! Thanks again

    • @nimeshamohottige9872
      @nimeshamohottige9872 3 месяца назад

      Great work.Thank you

  • @ninuuh
    @ninuuh Месяц назад

    I have questions about statistical inference. Can you help me solve them?

    • @briangreco2718
      @briangreco2718  Месяц назад

      If you have a question related to the video, I may be able to help. If it’s not related to the video, I probably can’t help.

    • @ninuuh
      @ninuuh Месяц назад

      @@briangreco2718 It is about statistical inference, unbiased estimator and sufficient statistic

    • @ninuuh
      @ninuuh Месяц назад

      It is related to statistical inference, adequate statistics and an unbiased estimator@@briangreco2718

    • @ninuuh
      @ninuuh Месяц назад

      It is about statistical inference, unbiased estimator and sufficient statistic​@@briangreco2718

    • @ninuuh
      @ninuuh Месяц назад

      @@briangreco2718 Yes, related to the video