Factorization Theorem for Sufficient Statistics

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
  • Step by step, I work through the definition of sufficient statistic (intuitive vs formula, showing them equal) then interpreting the claim made in the factorization theorem, and then line by line, I give a proof of the discrete case in both directions.

Комментарии • 21

  • @existentialrap521
    @existentialrap521 2 месяца назад +6

    Thx, Doc. We in the streets turning up to this one. Using exponential families right now for most sufficient statistic work, but I am hoping to get this theorem down well.
    Also, you looking sharp, homie. I like the haircut and fit. Fresh.

  • @pranavchandrav6071
    @pranavchandrav6071 2 месяца назад +1

    I'm studying to be an actuary, a big thanks to you for making these!

  • @petrussd8881
    @petrussd8881 2 года назад +11

    This is the most exact sufficiency video ever.

    • @robertcruikshank4501
      @robertcruikshank4501  2 года назад +7

      Thank you very much! When I struggle to learn an idea, I try to spare others the same grief.

  • @goosecouscous7658
    @goosecouscous7658 4 месяца назад +2

    Watching this 30 mins before my final exam. Thank u 😭😭😭

  • @williamkinum6941
    @williamkinum6941 Месяц назад +1

    This video was incredibly helpful! Thank you for posting this.

  • @aartikadu7282
    @aartikadu7282 2 года назад +4

    Your research behind the video, is crystally clear, making very easy to understand.
    Kindly we want more statistical videos. 😄

  • @yifuli9390
    @yifuli9390 2 года назад +1

    Hey, great stuff. Please keep up the good work. Much love!

  • @denisegandara7290
    @denisegandara7290 2 года назад +1

    Great explanation! Thank you!

  • @TheSGOGS
    @TheSGOGS Год назад +1

    thank you mr cruikshank

  • @kctsou821118
    @kctsou821118 Год назад +1

    This video helps a lot, thanks

  • @DarioGreco21
    @DarioGreco21 Год назад +1

    Thank you !

  • @timothykelebeng5230
    @timothykelebeng5230 Год назад +1

    brilliant

  • @4th_wall511
    @4th_wall511 Год назад +1

    I love you.

  • @Dupamine
    @Dupamine 2 года назад

    Man you are confusing as hell

    • @robertcruikshank4501
      @robertcruikshank4501  2 года назад +2

      Sorry the video didn't work for you. It IS a confusing topic. Where did you get lost? The first couple of minutes explain the definition of sufficient, and I cover that separately in at least one other video.
      What do you think would help? Some examples?

    • @Dupamine
      @Dupamine 2 года назад

      @@robertcruikshank4501 I will try to explain where I got confused at 1:09 you explain P(theta|x)=p(theta) is definiton of independence. I understand that.
      After that you say 'that means' and write some equation after that. How does that mean the next equation( P(theta and X= p(theta).p(X))?

    • @Dupamine
      @Dupamine 2 года назад

      @@robertcruikshank4501 hay man u just dissapeared everything fine with wife and family?

    • @robertcruikshank4501
      @robertcruikshank4501  2 года назад +3

      @@Dupamine Sorry I missed this until just now. There are three equivalent definitions of independence. Remember the definition of conditional probability P(A|B) = P(A and B)/P(B), so saying P(A|B) = P(A) is the same thing as saying P(A) = P(A and B)/P(B) or P(A) P(B) = P(A and B).

    • @Dupamine
      @Dupamine 2 года назад

      @@robertcruikshank4501 thanks man