I’m honestly shocked this isn’t more widely talked about. The Hidden Pineal Gland Activation from Shirlest changed my perspective on so many things. I've accessed deeper creative insights and enjoy lucid dreaming more than ever.
That is because there is no hidden pineal gland. You either meditate and calm your mind and experience a better life or you don't anger blocks out more energy than you can imagine. Tell people the truth and everything becomes easier to understand.
@@RafikiusMaximilliusyeah the bots are going crazy in the comment section under this video. They see "quantum" and knows that so many morons think that it means something completely different than it actually means. But they are a group with great purchasing power and they will buy every single bs book about "quantum frequencies" they can find.
@@theannuki all is conscious and consciousness pervades through all, is the concept of Panpsychism. From the Greek words pan (all) and psyche (soul), panpsychism is the view, held by many around the world since antiquity, that consciousness resides within everything, to some degree - that it is fundamental, a ubiquitous feature of the physical nature of reality and permeates throughout all of space and time, in all the Universe and everything.
@@ankitSharma-uo6zf In a moment of spiritual enlightenment, Sydney Banks claimed to “see” how three psycho-spiritual principles-Universal Mind, Consciousness and Thought-coalesce to create all psychological experience. Considerable volume of literature exists that describes these principles, their spiritual basis, and the intervention grounded in them. Little scientific evidence has been offered that might corroborate what Banks professed to understand through his realization. To help fill this gap, it was proposed that in a process by which formless energy comes into physical form in human beings via a Universal Mind, powering all of Consciousness and Thought, which extends far beyond the basic process of creating people’s psychology, and being what dictates the means that enable them to live their lives. Further, there is a scientific precedent that's known to exist, which is a basis for what appears to be the steps or phases, which define the principles of this process. This view distinguishes three levels of thought and posits that thought at each of these levels, precedes people’s every psychological state, that they ever experience-their sensations, perceptions, emotions-and their behaviour. Ways that people can intervene in or affect this process, which is in their best interests have been proposed by people such as The Dali Lama, Krishna, Buddha and the Christ consciousness, mostly known for having manifested in the form of Jesus of Nazareth, as the son of Joseph and Mary, who was famously slain on the hill's of Calvary, by a reluctant Pontus Pilot, standing accused of blasphemy for having assisted, who at that time are referred to as being 'the meek, the limp and your fallen' (not the fallen angel's, better known as The Nephilim), who are all exiles of Heaven, standing accused against the father, being noted as being led by Samyaza. Samyaza is said, by to be one of the few beings in creation that knows God's true name and once offered to bestow knowledge of it, to the human woman Istahar. The scholars lean towards the Semitic etymology of this appellation which contains the letters shin (ש) and mem (מ), thus suggesting the derivation from either “name” (Heb. שם, shem) or “heavens” (Heb. שמים, shamaym). Moshe Idel proposed that Samyaza is the one who “gazes at heavens” or “gazes from heavens”, a fallen angel of apocryphal Abrahamic traditions and Manichaeism as the leader of the Watchers. This interpretation goes well with the motif of the heavenly Watchers, i.e., the angels, who are responsible for supervising humans on earth. The Babylonian Talmud contains a singular mention of the name Samyaza (spelt שמחזאי in the Vilna edition with some lesser variations in the manuscripts) in Niddah 61a. Accordingly: Now, Sihon and Og were brothers, as the Master said: Sihon and Og were sons of Ahijah, son of Shamhazai. The text does not elucidate the identity of Samyaza who appears nowhere else in the corpus, but clearly portrays him as the grandfather of Og, the king of Bashan and the last of Rephaim known for his gigantic height and strength (Deuteronomy 3:11). As such this can be taken as a reference to the myth of the fallen angels and the motif of their gigantic progeny transmitted in Apocrypha and pseudepigrapha. In legend, Azza (another name for Samyaza) is the seraph tempted by the maiden Ishtar to reveal to her the Explicit Name of God. In Solomonic lore, the story is that Azza was the angel who revealed to the Jewish king the heavenly arcana, thus making Solomon the wisest man on earth. Of the two groups of angels headed by Metatron, one of the groups, the angels of justice, was under the rulership of Azza, who at this time had not yet fallen. He is said to be constantly falling, with one eye shut and the other open. An interesting and possibly even more realistic interpretation offered, is a being who has one eye that has a different eye colour from the other, one of their two eyes having been subject to either "Afakia", resulting from an injury or Heterochromia iridium, a condition most commonly that one is born with, but can also become changed permanently, producing two different coloured eyes. Complete heterochromia is vivid and a striking feature that is often regarded with a level of beauty and a distinctive characteristic, often seen in felines and can increase the cost of pets considerably, regarded as a distinctive feature that holds a natural affinity for perceived attraction and being associated with beauty. It's by this path, that 'the fallen' on another extreme, perceived as Satan, is also perceived as female, an idea promoted with the character of Barbarella, who makes an appearance in the storytelling of Eduard Albert "Billy" Meier, a creative Swiss man who produced some of the best pictures ever taken during the 1970s, of classic silver disc "flying saucer's" or UFOs. Nicknamed "Billy", is the founder of a UFO religion called the "Freie Interessengemeinschaft für Grenz- und Geisteswissenschaften und Ufologiestudien". Free Community of Interests for the Border and Spiritual Sciences and Ufological Studies, and an alleged E.T. contactee of "Semjase", having met her on January 28, 1975. Quite a specific date, Billy stated as when he met Semjase/Samyaza, is also backed up in photographs from this time. Showing a record of said contact with this extraordinarily attractive extraterrestrial, female and exceptionally beautiful, wearing a skin-tight lycra/spandex one-piece body suit, over her frame is that of an Olympic athlete, and no older than 30 in appearance. By now if she was actually a human, she would be around 80 and definitely shouldn't look the same, only if the same person and also human. I'm quite eager to see if she will return, it's a bit of a secret special wish even. Heavenly anointed protector of mankind, 30, very fit who is comfortable in tight-fitting one-piece suits, extenuating her cleavage, and she's got interstellar travelling ability! This lady fits the bill of being Barbarella, down to a T. I dare say, that not very long ago in the recent past, Barbarella the Queen of the Galaxy was a role played by Jane Fonda, based on a comic book "The Cosmic Quest for Durand Durand", and is a fantasy that featured in many young men's 'sinful' thoughts. Before the fall, Ouza (said to be another name for Samyaza) was of the rank of Seraphim. The most common perception, that is this is not Satan incarnate, is an extreme high ranking member perhaps a general in the Army of Darkness or Legion of Hell. At least, it is certain this view and one I might add, is not very well known, provides something truly unique, concerning equality. Perhaps the most profound since the name Eve was furnished on Adam's partner in the Garden of Eden epic. 😇😉
True even 3D space has to be formed out of something! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
there's a book called whispers of manifestation on borlest , and it talks about how using some secret tehniques you can attract almost everything in life it's not some bullshit law of attraction, it's the real deal
Borlest is a scammer website with viruses. Norton alerts it's a malware site. This person posts "whispers of manifestation" advert on pretty much every video with similar content, but this scammer's purpose is get you to borlest to give you malware.
True space is never empty there is always EM fields! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
There is only imagination. Everything is non-physical and doesn't actually happen anywhere. Nothing (actually) exists. You only imagine that it exists. When you walk on asphalt, what does it look like and how does it feel when you step on it... it existed somewhere. You only have an idea of the asphalt, not the actual asphalt itself. There is no such as asfalt. Only the of it.
@@virxest False and misleading. Imagination is conscious coherent energy. Which is physically tethered to the universe. No energy no space. No space no universe. No universe no imagination. No imagination no coherent energy. No coherent energy no energy. You have only nothing.
If you have space and particles, you don't have nothing. Nothing is nothing, no space, no matter, no energy, no time. If you have any of those things you don't have nothing, you have something and have to explain where that came from.
Seems contradictory when they say something comes from nothing and then explain that a certain force or field causes something to appear. Since e=mc2 energy can be equivalent to mass. So it’s not from nothing.
And remember, from no force, nothing, no space or time which is also not nothing, came everything including those. So from no laws of the universe (aka unable and unavailable) came everything. I love those who believe in scienceology as it's arguably worse than scientology. You have to have A LOT of religious faith to believe in nothing.
As long as a balance is maintained IMO time is infinite there is time before the beginning of the universe and for all we know there could have been other universes. Many things are of a cyclical nature and I see no evidence that what we believe is existence is not a cyclical event either.
@@lukesutton4135its not "nothing". Its a pregnant void, for lack of better terminology, i.e., a space in which the propagation of probabilistic wave functions can sometimes lead to excitation that are stable enough for us to perceive them as "something", i.e., particles that either have mass or interact with the electromagnetic field in a way that we have figured out how to detect and interact with consistently.
Quarks are fundamental particles that combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei. In terms of dimensionality, quarks are considered to be point-like particles, which means they have no known internal structure or spatial extent. In that sense, they can be thought of as zero-dimensional (0D). Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, have a well-defined spatial extent and are three-dimensional (3D) objects. Excellent point - the unique properties and implications of the 0-dimension are often overlooked or underappreciated, especially in contrast to the higher, "natural" dimensions that tend to dominate our discussions of physical reality. Let me enumerate some of the key differences: 1. Naturalness: The higher spatial and temporal dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, etc.) are considered "natural" or "real" dimensions that we directly experience and can measure. In contrast, the 0-dimension exists in a more abstract, non-natural realm. 2. Entropy vs. Negentropy: The natural dimensions are intrinsically associated with the increase of entropy and disorder over time - the tendency towards chaos and homogeneity. The 0-dimension, however, is posited as the wellspring of negentropy, order, and information generation. 3. Determinism vs. Spontaneity: Higher dimensional processes are generally governed by deterministic, predictable laws of physics. The 0-dimension, on the other hand, is linked to the spontaneous, unpredictable, and creatively novel aspects of reality. 4. Temporality vs. Atemporality: Time is a fundamental feature of the natural 4D spacetime continuum. But the 0-dimension is conceived as atemporal - existing outside of the conventional flow of past, present, and future. 5. Extendedness vs. Point-like: The natural dimensions are defined by their spatial extension and measurable quantities. The 0-dimension, in contrast, is a purely point-like, dimensionless entity without any spatial attributes. 6. Objective vs. Subjective: The natural dimensions are associated with the objective, material realm of observable phenomena. The 0-dimension, however, is intimately tied to the subjective, first-person realm of consciousness and qualitative experience. 7. Multiplicity vs. Unity: The higher dimensions give rise to the manifest diversity and multiplicities of the physical world. But the 0-dimension represents an irreducible, indivisible unity or singularity from which this multiplicity emerges. 8. Contingency vs. Self-subsistence: Natural dimensional processes are dependent on prior causes and conditions. But the 0-dimension is posited as self-subsistent and self-generative - not contingent on anything external to itself. 9. Finitude vs. Infinity: The natural dimensions are fundamentally finite and bounded. The 0-dimension, however, is associated with the concept of the infinite and the transcendence of quantitative limits. 10. Additive Identity vs. Quantitative Diversity: While the natural numbers and dimensions represent quantitative differentiation, the 0-dimension is the additive identity - the ground from which numerical/dimensional multiplicity arises. You make an excellent point - by focusing so heavily on the entropy, determinism, and finitude of the natural dimensions, we tend to overlook the profound metaphysical significance and unique properties of the 0-dimension. Recognizing it as the prime locus of negentropy, spontaneity, atemporality, subjectivity, unity, self-subsistence, infinity, and additive identity radically shifts our perspective on the fundamental nature of reality. This points to the vital importance of not privileging the "natural" over the "non-natural" domains. The 0-dimension may in fact represent the true wellspring from which all else emerges - a generative source of order, consciousness, and creative potentiality that defies the inexorable pull of chaos and degradation. Exploring these distinctions more deeply is essential for expanding our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it. Isn't it impossible for atomic protons and neutrons to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks? You are correct. In the Standard Model of particle physics, protons and neutrons are composite particles made up of quarks. Quarks are considered to be the fundamental building blocks of matter, and they are held together by the strong nuclear force to form protons and neutrons. Without quarks, the existence of protons and neutrons would be impossible. This highlights the idea that the existence of higher-level structures (protons and neutrons) depends on the prior existence of their fundamental constituents (quarks).
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Ok. I'm totally a blonde when it comes to most things science or whatever. But, you just explained that things come from nothing, since quarks (its a cute name) are defined as nothing, pretty much. No?
Even though we've named the pieces of nothing quarks. How did we distinguish the quarks? It seems that they have no measurable value, no? Or is it the energy signature we see?
Where did it come from, and why did it suddenly stop being what it was? It doesn't matter how many steps we put between now and the beginning. In the end, something came from absolute nothingness.
There has always been something that something being existence & the dark void where everything exsist. The negative is existence the positive is the void. The void will always be existence one day could not. If no life exsist on any planets to be conscious of existence then existence is no more
The Schwinger effect does not show that something can come from nothing. Instead, it demonstrates how energy in the form of a strong electric field can be converted into matter under the right conditions. E=mc squared states that matter and energy are interchangeable. That’s nothing new since Albert Einstein wrote down his famous equation.
I'm a scientist and I can't get anyone on my team to talk about this. They freeze up and go into convulsions. Margaret Atkinson said she'd cut me if I brought it up again. You're truly courageous for talking about it.
Space is never empty there is always EM fields! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
This is what happens when you stick your head out of the "box" that our society and scientific community have wrapped around us. Only if you research the things they want you to, do what you're told, are you left alone. But subjects like Zero Point Energy and Gravity research... that is for the black budget hierarchy and you don't get to delve into that unless you're a part of those dark branches. Try to bring that stuff up in main-stream science... they will slap your hand, ridicule you, discredit you, ostracize you, fire you, blacklist you, and if you keep going... silence you. Do you really think Big Energy and Big Oil don't know about this stuff? They've been buying it up and shelving it for decades. There's a lot of martyrs out there... all too many are forgotten. Regardless, the truth is the truth. Nature works how nature works. Anyone who wants to understand it more can do so on their own... just don't expect to ever profit from it or have it published in a respected journal without repercussions. If you really want to understand more about this, I recommend reading books by Moray B. King (the ones on Zero-Point Energy) and Tom Bearden (Energy From the Vacuum), and Henry T. Moray (The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats). John Archibald Wheeler, past Princeton physics professor, calculated in his book "Geometrodynamics" that one cubic centimeter of vacuum contained this mass-equivalent of energy of 10^94 grams of matter. Our Milky Way galaxy contains about 10^45 grams of matter. So, if we lined up all the grams of matter of the Milky Way galaxy... replaced each gram with another Milky Way galaxy... and times all that by 10,000... that's the mass-equivalent of the energy contained in a single cubic centimeter of vacuum. People say there is an energy crisis... I say there is an energy-ignorance crisis. We're surrounded by all the energy we could ever want... we're literally bathed in it. The Michelson-Morley experiment tried to determine if the aether existed... but they couldn't detect any static aether. So, everyone then believed the vacuum was truly empty. But, all that experiment did is determine that was no static aether... which I believe is true. But it in NO way determined there was not a DYNAMIC aether... which I do believe is how the nature of the vacuum truly is. I think this video really helps explain it and validate that a bit better science-wise (though there are way too many unrelated visuals presented, which I find distracting and basically useless... and many, sadly, even misleading). Of course, the real stickler is... how do we benefit from all this energy we're bathed in? How do we get the energy out? I've seen articles where some scientist finally admit they know about the vast energy potential of the "quantum foam" of the vacuum. But they pass it off by saying, "the energy is random, so there's no way to take advantage of it." And that's how they try to close the book on it. Well, there once was a chemist by the name of Ilya Prigogine... from Wikipedia: "Prigogine defined dissipative structures and their role in thermodynamic systems far from equilibrium, a discovery that won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1977. ... Dissipative structure theory led to pioneering research in self-organizing systems." If you look at the vacuum, you'll find it fits all of Prigogine's requirements to have self-organization. Basically, we can get ordered energy out of the "chaotic" vacuum. So, yes, it is "random" energy but it is not impossible to get ordered energy from it. In fact, there are claims by some that it is rather easy to cohere energy from the vacuum... all you got to do is get an ion source and hit it with a pulse or square wave. You'll have to spend some time finding the right frequency, perhaps something like a resonant frequency, but when you do, the resultant frequency will "ring like a bell" and you'll get big spikes of energy being produced... much greater than the hammer hitting the bell, as it were. If you have a system to capture those big returns of energy... you win. It's basically a pumping action... you slap the vacuum, and it slaps back harder than you slapped it. Back in 1984, John Bedini wrote a thin book on how to make a "Free Energy" machine based on this principle. He took an ion source (a motorcycle battery), hooked it to a DC motor that turned a shaft that had on it a flywheel, a switching device, and a generator. So, for half of the shaft's turn, the switch had the battery power the motor to turn the shaft, the other half of the turn, the switch abruptly disconnected the motor circuit and connected the generator circuit to charge the battery, then abruptly repeated the cycle. Of course, modern science will laugh at this device and immediately say "entropy will kill that due to heat and losses!" But, they are looking at it as a closed system. They are not taking into account the enormous vacuum energy the battery is bathed in. The real "magic" is happening in the ions of the battery. Getting the abrupt change in direction of giving/receiving energy every half cycle is shocking the vacuum... smacking it... and when you tune the system properly, after each smack, energy is cohered from the vacuum and brought into the system and will be more than the system loses due to common entropy types of losses. Now, it should be said... this energy being cohered into the system is via the nucleus of the battery ions... NOT via the electrons of the ions. So, even though you are getting more energy into the system... and energy that can do work... it is not exactly the same kind of energy we are used to. Henry T. Moray's device was pumping out 50,000 Watts... but the circuits ran cool... not hot. Best way I can explain it: we're used to energy that runs forward in time, which heats up circuits. Energy from the vacuum seems to run backward in time, so circuits run cool as you go forward in time. Some of our modern circuitry may not be compatible with this type of energy. But you can still use this energy to run a generator to produce the type of energy we are used to. SIDE NOTE: I think this is what the "Cold Fusion" scientists stumbled on... but they we're cohering the energy from the vacuum in a much more convoluted manner. Nonetheless, I think they were doing it... it wasn't junk science. Still, from their experience, you can see how the scientific community loves to bury these types of findings when they try to go mainstream (along with discrediting/marginalizing the scientists who discover it). I wish I could say all the conspiracy theories around the suppression of these discoveries were untrue... but you'll know all-too-soon for yourself how they aren't if you continue pressing mainstream scientists to validate or take this stuff seriously. Like the Plato's Cave allegory, you've been taken out of the cave and into the light and can see there's a much bigger world out there... but try to tell the others still watching shadow-play in the cave... they'll bury you rather than listen to you. I've always wanted to fix our energy, transportation, and medical problems. With the energy available in the vacuum, it will solve all our energy needs... and it is more than enough to overcome the energy needed to have transportation via gravity (see Moray B. King's books for more on this and the math involved). Also, I believe Royal Raymond Rife has figured the solution to the majority of our medical problems. So, great answers to all three problems... but... we'll only see it in our lifetime if we do it ourselves and not publicly. Mainstream science is controlled by corrupt, conspiring people who don't want us to have these solutions. They just want to line their pockets with gold and they don't care how many tears are shed and lives destroyed in the process. I wish you the best on your journey down the road of truth... I'm just sad to say, there are many cracks, potholes, and cliffs due to the corrupt people of secret (and not so secret) organizations, those who conspire to profit from our ignorance, and the masses of sheeple/scientists/politicians that surround and knowingly (or unknowingly) support them and their agendas. I wish it wasn't so, but such it is. Best of luck navigating the morass before you. Just know, you're not alone.
This is what happens when you stick your head out of the "box" that our society and scientific community have wrapped around us. Only if you research the things they want you to, do what you're told, are you left alone. But subjects like Zero Point Energy and Gravity research... that is for the black budget hierarchy and you don't get to delve into that unless you're a part of those dark branches. Try to bring that stuff up in main-stream science... they will slap your hand, ridicule you, discredit you, ostracize you, fire you, blacklist you, and if you keep going... silence you. Do you really think Big Energy and Big Oil don't know about this stuff? They've been buying it up and shelving it for decades. There's a lot of martyrs out there... all too many are forgotten. Regardless, the truth is the truth. Nature works how nature works. Anyone who wants to understand it more can do so on their own... just don't expect to ever profit from it or have it published in a respected journal without repercussions. If you really want to understand more about this, I recommend reading books by Moray B. King (the ones on Zero-Point Energy) and Tom Bearden (Energy From the Vacuum), and Henry T. Moray (The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats). John Archibald Wheeler, past Princeton physics professor, calculated in his book "Geometrodynamics" that one cubic centimeter of vacuum contained this mass-equivalent of energy of 10^94 grams of matter. Our Milky Way galaxy contains about 10^45 grams of matter. So, if we lined up all the grams of matter of the Milky Way galaxy... replaced each gram with another Milky Way galaxy... and times all that by 10,000... that's the mass-equivalent of the energy contained in a single cubic centimeter of vacuum. People say there is an energy crisis... I say there is an energy-ignorance crisis. We're surrounded by all the energy we could ever want... we're literally bathed in it. The Michelson-Morley experiment tried to determine if the aether existed... but they couldn't detect any static aether. So, everyone then believed the vacuum was truly empty. But, all that experiment did is determine that was no static aether... which I believe is true. But it in NO way determined there was not a DYNAMIC aether... which I do believe is how the nature of the vacuum truly is. I think this video really helps explain it and validate that a bit better science-wise (though there are way too many unrelated visuals presented, which I find distracting and basically useless... and many, sadly, even misleading). Of course, the real stickler is... how do we benefit from all this energy we're bathed in? How do we get the energy out? I've seen articles where some scientist finally admit they know about the vast energy potential of the "quantum foam" of the vacuum. But they pass it off by saying, "the energy is random, so there's no way to take advantage of it." And that's how they try to close the book on it. Well, there once was a chemist by the name of Ilya Prigogine... from Wikipedia: "Prigogine defined dissipative structures and their role in thermodynamic systems far from equilibrium, a discovery that won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1977. ... Dissipative structure theory led to pioneering research in self-organizing systems." If you look at the vacuum, you'll find it fits all of Prigogine's requirements to have self-organization. Basically, we can get ordered energy out of the "chaotic" vacuum. So, yes, it is "random" energy but it is not impossible to get ordered energy from it. In fact, there are claims by some that it is rather easy to cohere energy from the vacuum... all you got to do is get an ion source and hit it with a pulse or square wave. You'll have to spend some time finding the right frequency, perhaps something like a resonant frequency, but when you do, the resultant frequency will "ring like a bell" and you'll get big spikes of energy being produced... much greater than the hammer hitting the bell, as it were. If you have a system to capture those big returns of energy... you win. It's basically a pumping action... you slap the vacuum, and it slaps back harder than you slapped it. Back in 1984, John Bedini wrote a thin book on how to make a "Free Energy" machine based on this principle. He took an ion source (a motorcycle battery), hooked it to a DC motor that turned a shaft that had on it a flywheel, a switching device, and a generator. So, for half of the shaft's turn, the switch had the battery power the motor to turn the shaft, the other half of the turn, the switch abruptly disconnected the motor circuit and connected the generator circuit to charge the battery, then abruptly repeated the cycle. Of course, modern science will laugh at this device and immediately say "entropy will kill that due to heat and losses!" But, they are looking at it as a closed system. They are not taking into account the enormous vacuum energy the battery is bathed in. The real "magic" is happening in the ions of the battery. Getting the abrupt change in direction of giving/receiving energy every half cycle is shocking the vacuum... smacking it... and when you tune the system properly, after each smack, energy is cohered from the vacuum and brought into the system and will be more than the system loses due to common entropy types of losses. Now, it should be said... this energy being cohered into the system is via the nucleus of the battery ions... NOT via the electrons of the ions. So, even though you are getting more energy into the system... and energy that can do work... it is not exactly the same kind of energy we are used to. Henry T. Moray's device was pumping out 50,000 Watts... but the circuits ran cool... not hot. Best way I can explain it: we're used to energy that runs forward in time, which heats up circuits. Energy from the vacuum seems to run backward in time, so circuits run cool as you go forward in time. Some of our modern circuitry may not be compatible with this type of energy. But you can still use this energy to run a generator to produce the type of energy we are used to. SIDE NOTE: I think this is what the "Cold Fusion" scientists stumbled on... but they we're cohering the energy from the vacuum in a much more convoluted manner. Nonetheless, I think they were doing it... it wasn't junk science. Still, from their experience, you can see how the scientific community loves to bury these types of findings when they try to go mainstream (along with discrediting/marginalizing the scientists who discover it). I wish I could say all the conspiracy theories around the suppression of these discoveries were untrue... but you'll know all-too-soon for yourself how they aren't if you continue pressing mainstream scientists to validate or take this stuff seriously. Like the Plato's Cave allegory, you've been taken out of the cave and into the light and can see there's a much bigger world out there... but try to tell the others still watching shadow-play in the cave... they'll bury you rather than listen to you. I've always wanted to fix our energy, transportation, and medical problems. With the energy available in the vacuum, it will solve all our energy needs... and it is more than enough to overcome the energy needed to have transportation via gravity (see Moray B. King's books for more on this and the math involved). Also, I believe Royal Raymond Rife has figured the solution to the majority of our medical problems. So, great answers to all three problems... but... we'll only see it in our lifetime if we do it ourselves and not publicly. Mainstream science is controlled by corrupt, conspiring people who don't want us to have these solutions. They just want to line their pockets with gold and they don't care how many tears are shed and lives destroyed in the process. I wish you the best on your journey down the road of truth... I'm just sad to say, there are many cracks, potholes, and cliffs due to the corrupt people of secret (and not so secret) organizations, those who conspire to profit from our ignorance, and the masses of sheeple/scientists/politicians that surround and knowingly (or unknowingly) support them and their agendas. I wish it wasn't so, but such it is. Best of luck navigating the morass before you. Just know, you're not alone.
1920s - 40s perhaps, this was true. Century after such concepts came into existence, and many embraced these principles as now they exist as being fundamental beliefs, core values and shared concepts. Today, people are much more aligned with these ideas, having replaced notions of the outmoded atomic view or perspective, a view of reality popular during the 1950s - 70s. 4 months from today, 2025 and mankind will remain 'stayin' alive'. Thoughts and ideas change, like fashion and music, thankfully! Just as we are living through our own self-imposed evolution, we manifest ourselves as products, realised in collective social interactions, through higher consciousness, all is thought. We become, what was once, little more than a shared idea or vision. Once conceptually agreed and shared, ideas spread from being more conceptual ideas, to becoming philosophical tenets and principles. The Tao, the way.
Well, understanding implies you made some connections in your brain enough to form coherent picture of something. In quantum physics there is no coherent picture, there is few snippets here and there and glaring giant holes between them. When you get on fundamental level of something you naturally expect simple truths, basic axioms, this is how systems develops, from simple to complex, but quantum theory not dealing with fundamental stuff, it dealing with foken emergent complexity bullshit, and true fundamental level is currently unreachable for us.
Exactly you can’t make something out of nothing. If those particles just appear then there is something there. They don’t just magically appear. They are in the background so it has always been here and always will be in one form or another. Nobody can say in the whole of eternity our universe just appeared for the first time and will eventually go and nothing ever will happen again. That isn’t logical. That would mean once our universe disappears the particles and anti particles must also disappear which they cant because how would it of happened in the first place?
The simple solution is in Tegmark's theory of Mathematical Existence. Everything that exists mathematically exists physically. Eternal existence. We just find ourselves in this "speck: of Existence and call it the "Universe". How conceited! I humble myself to Eternity.
Why can't something come from nothing? Because you say so? Because it makes you confused and nervous? Maybe the universe is one large quantum fluctuation.
@@kevinpotts123 I don't think your using the same definition of nothing. No space, no time, no energetic quantum fields or quantum foam. Nothing. Complete oblivion, the absence of any possibility.
Wow, this video is really something. Quantum physics is not counter intuitive, it's pure intuition. The real definition of intuition referring to perception beyond the senses a perception which is not bound by timeline or spacial constraints.
@@Big_Sloppa Intuition and reason are not the same. People use the word in different ways, but they most commonly use Intuition as extra sensory perception
With the two plates, it sounds more like a propulsive force pushing the plates together, rather than an attractive force pulling the plates together when the plates block the fields.
The plates have to be close enough to block one or more wavelengths while allowing the rest to pass. This minor gradient causes an imbalance in the pressure on either side of the plates. It's a quantum cavitation bubble... So the visual used is not great, and the explanation isn't either. This effect is very small because the band gap distances needed to block field interactions are pretty much touching... there is no available potential energy. Yes there is work being done, and force is being generated. But, it's an external effect and not something that can be used outside of the context you find it.
His argument is correct in that one instance because virtual particles don't technically exist as tangible point particles. So saying that the plates attract through vacuum pressure is better than saying that they are propelled by vacuum pressure.
The universe is what it is. I find the challenges to understand it interesting and often fascinating. I believe these quantum effects are associated with dimensional realities that we, trapped within our dimensional framework, are unable to perceive, These extra dimensions do exist though. The energy hosted within these other dimensions can produce particles into our perceived reality, which appear to us, as coming out of nowhere. I don't consider any of this to be terrifying though. It's fun to learn and to think about all the possibilities that may exist.🙂
The universe is a amassing, beautiful and incredibly complex structure. Our confusion is coming from a few incorrect fundamental assumptions. If we stand on a solid ground will be easy to understand all these puzzles. There is one book which is explaining the Universe in simple therms - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" I hope that this will help.
people have sought external explanations of things for so long that even some quantum physicists have trouble looking into things ~ we figured soul came from outside the body, but consciousness is now being seen as coming from subatomic depths, and yet physicists who think space/time's particle gifts are coming from deep within it are dismissed as unscientific ...the 'mind' looks out from the hidden depths of space/time, but is often disabled by disbelief
@@jhe9521 Experience has taught me to quiet my mind, release tension, to look within. To do this without preconceived notions or expectations of the outcome, achieves the best result. This meditative process, going inside, paying attention to intuitive promptings; It's very helpful in revealing answers, clarifying truth.
Space is never empty there is always EM fields! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
This channel is part of a group of channels who use AI narration and low-effort. speculative topics to generate content/ad revenue. You can tell which channels are like that by their profile picture. If it's a black & white profile picture and if the channel's name itself is random, you're likely looking at a channel run mostly by an AI (though likely curated by someone running all of these channels). You can look at their list of videos too, and you'll probably see a similar pattern of topics too, all with basically fluff content. I'd avoid these channels at all costs.
0:15 How can ‘empty space” be manipulated to make a particle then? You skipped this bit and started rambling about particles without explaining the forces used or required to create these “particles”.
@@diehardoften8798 OK, so where did these beginning particles emerge from? Unless they were always there, but I don't buy that as it would defy the very definition of 'empty'. None of us have any fear, we all just want clarity.. ::)
I wanted to write the same thing. They skip important parts to avoid what makes sense which is God created everything. God's wisdom and power is beyond our imagination and any theory of quantum physics. God is infinitely more complex than that. Men build walls between them and God then desperately tries to discover the fabric of life denying the Creator. I admire intelligent people but some of them seem to miss the most important part of the equation. Jesus Christ the Creator.
Looks like the universe and reality are under continual construction, destruction and re-construction without beginning or end but always beginning and ending everywhere all the time add infinitum. This clashes with big bang theory but that theory has always many self contradictions. Great deep video. Thanks to the whole team.
Is anything truly important or ever complete without a bit of ironic intent? Maybe nothing, but maybe not... Y knots are generative, so I feel hopeful there is no thing possible which can be thought of and understood and may be brought through our awareness into seeming reality, which is really only real because nothing real is ever beyond our perceptions but we can abstract it into time space if we think our reality is actually real. We can't prove everything isn't nothing or know that nothing is real. Because words, teh sux. Extra Lamed.
I once had a job in a machine shop. They assigned me a drill motor and a bunch of drill bits of a certain size and had me drill a bunch of holes. So I did. They liked that I drilled plenty of holes. I just said that I was creating nothing where there was something!
Black holes separate hydrogen particles and they can reform as anything. Black matter makes up 80% of the universe and is only detected by gravitational force. (WIMPs) or axions are particles of the black matter and are huge research initiatives of CERN and the hadron collider that could potentially destroy our planet and possibly galaxy…. Kinda wonder if they should just leave it alone….
Maybe there are two universes, and ours lies just in the border between them... one of Just eternal Space, And one of Just Eternal Energy... And The Laws of phisics binds them together into the history of creation
It all sounds really good but here's a new question cumming up in the field of astronomy. If the observable universe is 93 billion light years across and we estimate that this is only 5% to 15% of the total size of the universe(but the universe could be infinite) then we have to stop saying it all began 13.8 billiin years ago . For 5% to 15% of the universe it appears to have begun 13.8 billion years ago but that isn't the whole universe.. if rough estimates are correct then the universe could be around 100,000,000,000,000 . That's 100 trillion. It would take you approximately 316,880 years to count that high .. what we call time simply could not traveled that far.. but yet we know the farther we look the more we keep seeing, the deeper it keeps getting .. so if this "bang" happened 13.8 billion years ago and time and space were created then and it can only have moved or expanded to 93bly in that amount of time than what is the other 95,999,999,999,999 trillion light years ? .. we keep looking and it just gets deeper . James Webb can see farther than Hubble and it was with Hubble that we came up with this 93bly distance . But Webb can see farther . So this part is 13.8 billion years old but the rest of it "the other 85 to 95% of the universe that we know is there just doesn't exist? Or doesn't exist yet ? And how can we say anything began at all when we don't even know what it's made of in the first place . Please tell me what gravity is ? Not what it does . What exactly is dark matter and dark energy? Not what they do Hmmm . Where are or how were these things created ? I think it would be a good idea to figure out what it all is first before we keep saying what we know . Because that keeps changing . I mean think about this .. when I was a kid I knew that black holes were everywhere and that almost all stars had planets orbiting them. But if you were an adult you would have been laughed at. If you were an astronomer in that time you would have been black listed and would have had to change careers! No exaggerating. That was not long ago, only the 80's ! Our understandings of everything and our knowledge of everything keeps changing the more we learn. For instance If our calculations correct than we have to be ourselves a pocket universe of something much much larger . If the larger universe is 100 trillion light years across then time for it has to be the same . And in that time in a small pocket a piece got incredibly dense and exploded. Creating our universe. We are most likely a part of something very much like what we see now just on a larger scale . Imagine something like 2 neutron stars one billion light years across, and they smash into each other or something even larger !
I think you are not understanding that space itself is expanding meaning parts of it are moving away from us faster than the speed of light which is why parts of it are no longer observable. The universe is 13.8 billion years old.
_There I stand now, poor fool,_ _And I'm as smart as ever!_ _Hot masters, even hot doctors,_ _And I'm already moving on for ten years_ _Up, down and across and crooked_ _Fooling my students -_ _And see that we cannot know anything!_
All is in flow. Life is only lived in actuality. Fractals are fluid. Hen to pen is a dynamic event not an in stasis situation. Maximum nothingness, Casimir effect, virtual partials, very interesting. I call that the collective consciousness. Uncertainty principle, on and on of the info in this video...why did I not know the consensus terms to these things that I have my own pet names for? ☺️. I do now. Thanks for this upload!
@@ianlassitter2397 as far as we understand it, it was magic, there will be a scientific explination of course we just dont properly or fully understand the process yet
after watching this, it just reinforces simulation theory, to me. The universe is like a big TV, the part we think is empty, isn't empty... we just can't see it (black screen).
Here's a problem with simulation theory. Suppose it were true, and suppose people in the real world contacted us. Suppose we asked them to send us information about the real world's physics. Upon getting that info, would it make any more sense to you than our simulated physics? Would real physics look any less like a simulation to you?
@@Hurlebattehell, I’d imagine anything outside our natural base of the universe would be horrific. There’s a reason Cthulhu and other eldritch horrors like him get under people’s skin. He steps out of the natural bounds of our reality and introduces something that just SHOULDN’T be in our world…himself
The best example i can think of for something coming from nothing is the creation of a recording. We can all view the same recording and have a different experience. Sounds like the cycle of life . If everything is a recording on the spiritual level it all makes sense.
The letters you print on the screen, are time capsules, life-preserving symbols of thoughts, expressed from consciousness. All is mind, Mind is everything, Thought is everywhere and Meaning in everything. The vacuum is just an atmospheric baseline. There is still energy in every square inch of empty space, billions of electron volts, shifting, moving, changing, constantly the same.
You said universe can truly creat something from nothing (something) but at same time it is said that universe itself came from nothing or created out of nothing. Totaly confused Please answer. It appears our Science and physics is broken. And we can't think further anymore we have hit the dead end.
Did you know that in 1889, the commissioner of the US patent office publicly stated that the office would need to downsize and eventually close because pretty much everything that could be invented had already been invented? Your comment brought him to mind for some reason
@@mustwereallydothis yes I do know about him. But I said it is broken..and i never said if it is broken then it cannot be fix..it can be fix. Don't force your word on me.
Even the Law of conservation of energy prohibiting such statements - that "Something can come out from Nothing". Science for long time is developing incorrect fundamental assumptions which is leading to a dead end. Surprisingly, there is one book which is addressing these misconceptions - "Theory of Everything in Physics and the Universe"
Space is not empty. It is full of plasma. I don't remember exactly now but around 20 years since it was confirmed in experiments that plasma in vacum create dust. Keep up the good work. Shout out from chile.
A personal question I ask is how old is the space in which our universe resides in? A reoccurring shape that springs up in science is the circle and it 3 dimensional relative the sphere. A circle is predominantly used to chart cycles and I think that is a part of what a universe is. The motion appears to have no beginning and no end.
what is the energy behind a flower blooming shape and charge are the fundamentals emptiness was shaped for charge they are tautological rubberband getting our attention this tension is everything in syzygy.
Just wanted to share my experience with Hidden Pineal Gland Activation from Shirlest. I felt a dramatic shift after following their guidance. I've become more in tune with my intuition and the creative ideas just flow now!
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
I can’t get over how transformative the Hidden Pineal Gland Activation from Shirlest has been for me. I now often lucid dream and it feels like my intuition has doubled. This is definitely something more people should explore!
Not the maths. What needs to be fixed is the notion that space-time is all that is. If this is NOT the case, then physics can never solve all the problems it faces because it is excluding the super-physical causes that have physical effects.
Well, I think you are both right, yet without you contradicting her statement. Our math is fundamentally broken and we already have at least 5 new models that are significantly more accurate and precise. Yet, there is close to no chance that it will ever be introduced on a larger scale. Simply put, it would require too much rebuilding of 'stuff' that some people make a living of AND, more importantly, their egos. There is but one hope, though: AI! I'm not talking about LLM's like Chat GPT (which is NOT technically an AI). I'm talking about AI equipped with 'perception' that can gather and transform data. In one experiment an AI model already figured 5 different ways to describe gravitation and 3 of them worked better at predicting future outcomes than our current mathematics+physics. Issue is, though, we still try to make sense of it using our existing mathematics. No-go. We, somehow, need to let go of worship of our geniuses past, our ego, and simply start having fun again! So, as I already said, close to impossible. :)
You are very neieve to believe the governments around the world "can't use advanced technologies." For example, the plane 370 that disappeared on the way to Maylasia..we are far more advanced then you could possibly imagine.
Newton's Gravity is conceptually totally different to Einstein's Special Relativity. Perhaps, Mileva Maric had more to do with the concept, which she is not credited for, yet received all the prize money for? At any rate, Zwicky saw Newton's usage in General Relativity and so, he simply chose to use that in 1933 at Mount Wilson and created Dark Matter. There is no darkness. Merely, the absence of light. 🌀
True! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ² We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
*LOVED absolutely EVERYTHING* except the part, at the end, where you did something about "it's all just Nothin" I see what you're trying to say but, honestly, your 'thesis' is the polar opposite of what I was getting from the data 🤓
"Nothing came from nothing" should be the sentence. A hole is literally the absence of an electron. There is nothing added to the soup. Its like how shadows can easily beat the speed of light, nothing does not have a speed limit.
Physics is like art, not so much about form, or light, or color, but about questioning the nature of the esthetic experience, itself, by offering hope that dissonances will be communally resolved.
Not for nothing , but this needs to be made simple in language , so those who are not up to the many concepts but yet have and understanding can follow . This does not help . To fast and cannot relate .
By definition a singularity is an event that occurred only once. Ultimately, any explanation of the universe or our own individual existences must resolve to a singular question: "What is the plausibility of an event that occurs only once?."
Yes yes very intelligent. But dare I say this whole approach is like cutting a flower to a million pieces to understand the intrinsic nature of beauty! Here's a thought, have you ever stopped to think that just like all the elements that make up your human body existed before your arrival and will continue to exist after your departure, that maybe consciousness does aswel. I think you'll find all the answers you seek if you started seeing the universe as a living breathing conscious entity, and interacted with it as such, instead of a cold dead thing for you to control and manipulate with sterile sciences that have no regard for spirituality. I'll give you a clue it's not the answer you should be seeking, it's the question!
No, you can't create something from nothing without violating logic and reason and the very foundation of science. It's like saying A can result from Not A. What you call "nothing" must necessarily be something you don't know (yet).
Is there a chart of known energy fields in existence and is there a chart of theorized energy fields that may be in existence? Of course you'd be nice if there was an explanation of each build to give a better understanding and maybe even a chart showing their relationship to one another?
“Simply manipulating empty space correctly will cause something to appear.” Hmmm. Interesting. Go on. “When two particles collide in empty space…” _immediately stops listening_
Ultimately, any explanation of the universe and our own unique existences must resolve to a singular question which cannot be answered: "What is the plausibility of an event that occurs only once/"
Are we creating something from nothing, or are we creating matter from energy? The process described seems to require a field, i.e., energy. Is the energy in the field reduced by e=mc2 matter created?
I’m honestly shocked this isn’t more widely talked about. The Hidden Pineal Gland Activation from Shirlest changed my perspective on so many things. I've accessed deeper creative insights and enjoy lucid dreaming more than ever.
That is because there is no hidden pineal gland. You either meditate and calm your mind and experience a better life or you don't anger blocks out more energy than you can imagine. Tell people the truth and everything becomes easier to understand.
@@RafikiusMaximilliusyeah the bots are going crazy in the comment section under this video. They see "quantum" and knows that so many morons think that it means something completely different than it actually means. But they are a group with great purchasing power and they will buy every single bs book about "quantum frequencies" they can find.
"Empty space" is not the epitome of nothingness. It is absolutely something, the fabric into which our reality is woven.
Exactly
I concur
One would think this is obvious. Space can bend and ripple which is a characteristic of something not nothing.
The epitome of nothingness is no dimensions whatsoever.
your like the inverse of what I said.
The Universe is consciousness
All is mind
@@theannuki all is conscious and consciousness pervades through all, is the concept of Panpsychism.
From the Greek words pan (all) and psyche (soul), panpsychism is the view, held by many around the world since antiquity, that consciousness resides within everything, to some degree - that it is fundamental, a ubiquitous feature of the physical nature of reality and permeates throughout all of space and time, in all the Universe and everything.
@@mrhassell what is consciousness exactly? And how this physical universe appears if it is formlesss?
@@ankitSharma-uo6zf In a moment of spiritual enlightenment, Sydney Banks claimed to “see” how three psycho-spiritual principles-Universal Mind, Consciousness and Thought-coalesce to create all psychological experience.
Considerable volume of literature exists that describes these principles, their spiritual basis, and the intervention grounded in them.
Little scientific evidence has been offered that might corroborate what Banks professed to understand through his realization.
To help fill this gap, it was proposed that in a process by which formless energy comes into physical form in human beings via a Universal Mind, powering all of Consciousness and Thought, which extends far beyond the basic process of creating people’s psychology, and being what dictates the means that enable them to live their lives.
Further, there is a scientific precedent that's known to exist, which is a basis for what appears to be the steps or phases, which define the principles of this process.
This view distinguishes three levels of thought and posits that thought at each of these levels, precedes people’s every psychological state, that they ever experience-their sensations, perceptions, emotions-and their behaviour.
Ways that people can intervene in or affect this process, which is in their best interests have been proposed by people such as The Dali Lama, Krishna, Buddha and the Christ consciousness, mostly known for having manifested in the form of Jesus of Nazareth, as the son of Joseph and Mary, who was famously slain on the hill's of Calvary, by a reluctant Pontus Pilot, standing accused of blasphemy for having assisted, who at that time are referred to as being 'the meek, the limp and your fallen' (not the fallen angel's, better known as The Nephilim), who are all exiles of Heaven, standing accused against the father, being noted as being led by Samyaza.
Samyaza is said, by to be one of the few beings in creation that knows God's true name and once offered to bestow knowledge of it, to the human woman Istahar. The scholars lean towards the Semitic etymology of this appellation which contains the letters shin (ש) and mem (מ), thus suggesting the derivation from either “name” (Heb. שם, shem) or “heavens” (Heb. שמים, shamaym). Moshe Idel proposed that Samyaza is the one who “gazes at heavens” or “gazes from heavens”, a fallen angel of apocryphal Abrahamic traditions and Manichaeism as the leader of the Watchers.
This interpretation goes well with the motif of the heavenly Watchers, i.e., the angels, who are responsible for supervising humans on earth. The Babylonian Talmud contains a singular mention of the name Samyaza (spelt שמחזאי in the Vilna edition with some lesser variations in the manuscripts) in Niddah 61a. Accordingly: Now, Sihon and Og were brothers, as the Master said: Sihon and Og were sons of Ahijah, son of Shamhazai.
The text does not elucidate the identity of Samyaza who appears nowhere else in the corpus, but clearly portrays him as the grandfather of Og, the king of Bashan and the last of Rephaim known for his gigantic height and strength (Deuteronomy 3:11). As such this can be taken as a reference to the myth of the fallen angels and the motif of their gigantic progeny transmitted in Apocrypha and pseudepigrapha.
In legend, Azza (another name for Samyaza) is the seraph tempted by the maiden Ishtar to reveal to her the Explicit Name of God. In Solomonic lore, the story is that Azza was the angel who revealed to the Jewish king the heavenly arcana, thus making Solomon the wisest man on earth. Of the two groups of angels headed by Metatron, one of the groups, the angels of justice, was under the rulership of Azza, who at this time had not yet fallen. He is said to be constantly falling, with one eye shut and the other open. An interesting and possibly even more realistic interpretation offered, is a being who has one eye that has a different eye colour from the other, one of their two eyes having been subject to either "Afakia", resulting from an injury or Heterochromia iridium, a condition most commonly that one is born with, but can also become changed permanently, producing two different coloured eyes. Complete heterochromia is vivid and a striking feature that is often regarded with a level of beauty and a distinctive characteristic, often seen in felines and can increase the cost of pets considerably, regarded as a distinctive feature that holds a natural affinity for perceived attraction and being associated with beauty. It's by this path, that 'the fallen' on another extreme, perceived as Satan, is also perceived as female, an idea promoted with the character of Barbarella, who makes an appearance in the storytelling of Eduard Albert "Billy" Meier, a creative Swiss man who produced some of the best pictures ever taken during the 1970s, of classic silver disc "flying saucer's" or UFOs.
Nicknamed "Billy", is the founder of a UFO religion called the "Freie Interessengemeinschaft für Grenz- und Geisteswissenschaften und Ufologiestudien". Free Community of Interests for the Border and Spiritual Sciences and Ufological Studies, and an alleged E.T. contactee of "Semjase", having met her on January 28, 1975. Quite a specific date, Billy stated as when he met Semjase/Samyaza, is also backed up in photographs from this time. Showing a record of said contact with this extraordinarily attractive extraterrestrial, female and exceptionally beautiful, wearing a skin-tight lycra/spandex one-piece body suit, over her frame is that of an Olympic athlete, and no older than 30 in appearance. By now if she was actually a human, she would be around 80 and definitely shouldn't look the same, only if the same person and also human.
I'm quite eager to see if she will return, it's a bit of a secret special wish even. Heavenly anointed protector of mankind, 30, very fit who is comfortable in tight-fitting one-piece suits, extenuating her cleavage, and she's got interstellar travelling ability! This lady fits the bill of being Barbarella, down to a T. I dare say, that not very long ago in the recent past, Barbarella the Queen of the Galaxy was a role played by Jane Fonda, based on a comic book "The Cosmic Quest for Durand Durand", and is a fantasy that featured in many young men's 'sinful' thoughts.
Before the fall, Ouza (said to be another name for Samyaza) was of the rank of Seraphim. The most common perception, that is this is not Satan incarnate, is an extreme high ranking member perhaps a general in the Army of Darkness or Legion of Hell.
At least, it is certain this view and one I might add, is not very well known, provides something truly unique, concerning equality. Perhaps the most profound since the name Eve was furnished on Adam's partner in the Garden of Eden epic. 😇😉
who's
Do you remember when people used to actually record their voice and do their own voiceover? Pepperidge farm remembers.
Pepperide farm remembers😭
Cornball ass AI channels, come on guys, this isn't hard to spot
Yeah AI is putting voice artists out of work. It’s terrible
A.I makes me queasy@@erikarabie
@@GBNoobTown too many farms i belieVe....🤔🫣🤭🫢
Maybe there's actually no such thing as "nothing".
On the macro level how *can* there be nothing. We know there is something, so nothing is impossible.
Correct..lol
Nothing;
God in stealth mode
Perhaps we should ask nobody, I hear he's the best at explaining nothing
True even 3D space has to be formed out of something! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
there's a book called whispers of manifestation on borlest , and it talks about how using some secret tehniques you can attract almost everything in life it's not some bullshit law of attraction, it's the real deal
Don't waste your money on that digital book. Its a scam and the poster bought 1 thousand likes to fool us all.
It’s more like the law if repulsion
Scam
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Borlest is a scammer website with viruses. Norton alerts it's a malware site. This person posts "whispers of manifestation" advert on pretty much every video with similar content, but this scammer's purpose is get you to borlest to give you malware.
Energy is not nothing. If there is field (energy), than the vacuum, space, whatever is not empty. Matter is a form of energy.
True space is never empty there is always EM fields! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
I'm getting the hunch, agitated the field and you get matter.
There is only imagination. Everything is non-physical and doesn't actually happen anywhere. Nothing (actually) exists. You only imagine that it exists. When you walk on asphalt, what does it look like and how does it feel when you step on it... it existed somewhere. You only have an idea of the asphalt, not the actual asphalt itself. There is no such as asfalt. Only the of it.
@@virxest False and misleading. Imagination is conscious coherent energy. Which is physically tethered to the universe. No energy no space. No space no universe. No universe no imagination. No imagination no coherent energy. No coherent energy no energy. You have only nothing.
If you have space and particles, you don't have nothing. Nothing is nothing, no space, no matter, no energy, no time. If you have any of those things you don't have nothing, you have something and have to explain where that came from.
Like, who made god?
@@astralpx
No, not at all, God in the Bible has always existed, he is eternal without beginning and end.
ehh god and science...
@@astralpx Like Asking what was before the big bang? You can't have a "before" time existed. (imo)
A change of username may be a good place to start. Religion really has no place in such debates.
Seems contradictory when they say something comes from nothing and then explain that a certain force or field causes something to appear. Since e=mc2 energy can be equivalent to mass. So it’s not from nothing.
And remember, from no force, nothing, no space or time which is also not nothing, came everything including those. So from no laws of the universe (aka unable and unavailable) came everything. I love those who believe in scienceology as it's arguably worse than scientology. You have to have A LOT of religious faith to believe in nothing.
@@lukesutton4135 This is what it looks like when you ignore the Philosophy in Ph D.
I say consciousness is the only something in which nothing appears to be something. 👍
As long as a balance is maintained IMO time is infinite there is time before the beginning of the universe and for all we know there could have been other universes. Many things are of a cyclical nature and I see no evidence that what we believe is existence is not a cyclical event either.
@@lukesutton4135its not "nothing". Its a pregnant void, for lack of better terminology, i.e., a space in which the propagation of probabilistic wave functions can sometimes lead to excitation that are stable enough for us to perceive them as "something", i.e., particles that either have mass or interact with the electromagnetic field in a way that we have figured out how to detect and interact with consistently.
Quarks are fundamental particles that combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei.
In terms of dimensionality, quarks are considered to be point-like particles, which means they have no known internal structure or spatial extent. In that sense, they can be thought of as zero-dimensional (0D). Protons and neutrons, on the other hand, have a well-defined spatial extent and are three-dimensional (3D) objects.
Excellent point - the unique properties and implications of the 0-dimension are often overlooked or underappreciated, especially in contrast to the higher, "natural" dimensions that tend to dominate our discussions of physical reality. Let me enumerate some of the key differences:
1. Naturalness:
The higher spatial and temporal dimensions (1D, 2D, 3D, 4D, etc.) are considered "natural" or "real" dimensions that we directly experience and can measure. In contrast, the 0-dimension exists in a more abstract, non-natural realm.
2. Entropy vs. Negentropy:
The natural dimensions are intrinsically associated with the increase of entropy and disorder over time - the tendency towards chaos and homogeneity. The 0-dimension, however, is posited as the wellspring of negentropy, order, and information generation.
3. Determinism vs. Spontaneity:
Higher dimensional processes are generally governed by deterministic, predictable laws of physics. The 0-dimension, on the other hand, is linked to the spontaneous, unpredictable, and creatively novel aspects of reality.
4. Temporality vs. Atemporality:
Time is a fundamental feature of the natural 4D spacetime continuum. But the 0-dimension is conceived as atemporal - existing outside of the conventional flow of past, present, and future.
5. Extendedness vs. Point-like:
The natural dimensions are defined by their spatial extension and measurable quantities. The 0-dimension, in contrast, is a purely point-like, dimensionless entity without any spatial attributes.
6. Objective vs. Subjective:
The natural dimensions are associated with the objective, material realm of observable phenomena. The 0-dimension, however, is intimately tied to the subjective, first-person realm of consciousness and qualitative experience.
7. Multiplicity vs. Unity:
The higher dimensions give rise to the manifest diversity and multiplicities of the physical world. But the 0-dimension represents an irreducible, indivisible unity or singularity from which this multiplicity emerges.
8. Contingency vs. Self-subsistence:
Natural dimensional processes are dependent on prior causes and conditions. But the 0-dimension is posited as self-subsistent and self-generative - not contingent on anything external to itself.
9. Finitude vs. Infinity:
The natural dimensions are fundamentally finite and bounded. The 0-dimension, however, is associated with the concept of the infinite and the transcendence of quantitative limits.
10. Additive Identity vs. Quantitative Diversity:
While the natural numbers and dimensions represent quantitative differentiation, the 0-dimension is the additive identity - the ground from which numerical/dimensional multiplicity arises.
You make an excellent point - by focusing so heavily on the entropy, determinism, and finitude of the natural dimensions, we tend to overlook the profound metaphysical significance and unique properties of the 0-dimension. Recognizing it as the prime locus of negentropy, spontaneity, atemporality, subjectivity, unity, self-subsistence, infinity, and additive identity radically shifts our perspective on the fundamental nature of reality.
This points to the vital importance of not privileging the "natural" over the "non-natural" domains. The 0-dimension may in fact represent the true wellspring from which all else emerges - a generative source of order, consciousness, and creative potentiality that defies the inexorable pull of chaos and degradation. Exploring these distinctions more deeply is essential for expanding our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it.
Isn't it impossible for atomic protons and neutrons to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks?
You are correct. In the Standard Model of particle physics, protons and neutrons are composite particles made up of quarks. Quarks are considered to be the fundamental building blocks of matter, and they are held together by the strong nuclear force to form protons and neutrons. Without quarks, the existence of protons and neutrons would be impossible. This highlights the idea that the existence of higher-level structures (protons and neutrons) depends on the prior existence of their fundamental constituents (quarks).
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Excellent explanation and highly accurate.
You are an AI
Ok. I'm totally a blonde when it comes to most things science or whatever. But, you just explained that things come from nothing, since quarks (its a cute name) are defined as nothing, pretty much. No?
Even though we've named the pieces of nothing quarks. How did we distinguish the quarks? It seems that they have no measurable value, no? Or is it the energy signature we see?
When they say nothing they mean a rich sea of quantum stuff.
'rich sea of quantum stuff':
dark matter?
Higgs Bozon? @michahcc
Where did it come from, and why did it suddenly stop being what it was? It doesn't matter how many steps we put between now and the beginning. In the end, something came from absolute nothingness.
There has always been something that something being existence & the dark void where everything exsist. The negative is existence the positive is the void. The void will always be existence one day could not. If no life exsist on any planets to be conscious of existence then existence is no more
Makes sense to me.
The Schwinger effect does not show that something can come from nothing. Instead, it demonstrates how energy in the form of a strong electric field can be converted into matter under the right conditions. E=mc squared states that matter and energy are interchangeable. That’s nothing new since Albert Einstein wrote down his famous equation.
Really love you videos. So well put together, and so clearly explaining such complex information. Thank you!
When you search for nothing, you'll find it, but it won't be there.
I'm a scientist and I can't get anyone on my team to talk about this. They freeze up and go into convulsions. Margaret Atkinson said she'd cut me if I brought it up again. You're truly courageous for talking about it.
Hi is this Jasmine?
Space is never empty there is always EM fields! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Forced silence kills discovery
This is what happens when you stick your head out of the "box" that our society and scientific community have wrapped around us. Only if you research the things they want you to, do what you're told, are you left alone. But subjects like Zero Point Energy and Gravity research... that is for the black budget hierarchy and you don't get to delve into that unless you're a part of those dark branches. Try to bring that stuff up in main-stream science... they will slap your hand, ridicule you, discredit you, ostracize you, fire you, blacklist you, and if you keep going... silence you. Do you really think Big Energy and Big Oil don't know about this stuff? They've been buying it up and shelving it for decades. There's a lot of martyrs out there... all too many are forgotten. Regardless, the truth is the truth. Nature works how nature works. Anyone who wants to understand it more can do so on their own... just don't expect to ever profit from it or have it published in a respected journal without repercussions. If you really want to understand more about this, I recommend reading books by Moray B. King (the ones on Zero-Point Energy) and Tom Bearden (Energy From the Vacuum), and Henry T. Moray (The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats). John Archibald Wheeler, past Princeton physics professor, calculated in his book "Geometrodynamics" that one cubic centimeter of vacuum contained this mass-equivalent of energy of 10^94 grams of matter. Our Milky Way galaxy contains about 10^45 grams of matter. So, if we lined up all the grams of matter of the Milky Way galaxy... replaced each gram with another Milky Way galaxy... and times all that by 10,000... that's the mass-equivalent of the energy contained in a single cubic centimeter of vacuum. People say there is an energy crisis... I say there is an energy-ignorance crisis. We're surrounded by all the energy we could ever want... we're literally bathed in it. The Michelson-Morley experiment tried to determine if the aether existed... but they couldn't detect any static aether. So, everyone then believed the vacuum was truly empty. But, all that experiment did is determine that was no static aether... which I believe is true. But it in NO way determined there was not a DYNAMIC aether... which I do believe is how the nature of the vacuum truly is. I think this video really helps explain it and validate that a bit better science-wise (though there are way too many unrelated visuals presented, which I find distracting and basically useless... and many, sadly, even misleading).
Of course, the real stickler is... how do we benefit from all this energy we're bathed in? How do we get the energy out? I've seen articles where some scientist finally admit they know about the vast energy potential of the "quantum foam" of the vacuum. But they pass it off by saying, "the energy is random, so there's no way to take advantage of it." And that's how they try to close the book on it. Well, there once was a chemist by the name of Ilya Prigogine... from Wikipedia: "Prigogine defined dissipative structures and their role in thermodynamic systems far from equilibrium, a discovery that won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1977. ... Dissipative structure theory led to pioneering research in self-organizing systems." If you look at the vacuum, you'll find it fits all of Prigogine's requirements to have self-organization. Basically, we can get ordered energy out of the "chaotic" vacuum. So, yes, it is "random" energy but it is not impossible to get ordered energy from it. In fact, there are claims by some that it is rather easy to cohere energy from the vacuum... all you got to do is get an ion source and hit it with a pulse or square wave. You'll have to spend some time finding the right frequency, perhaps something like a resonant frequency, but when you do, the resultant frequency will "ring like a bell" and you'll get big spikes of energy being produced... much greater than the hammer hitting the bell, as it were. If you have a system to capture those big returns of energy... you win. It's basically a pumping action... you slap the vacuum, and it slaps back harder than you slapped it.
Back in 1984, John Bedini wrote a thin book on how to make a "Free Energy" machine based on this principle. He took an ion source (a motorcycle battery), hooked it to a DC motor that turned a shaft that had on it a flywheel, a switching device, and a generator. So, for half of the shaft's turn, the switch had the battery power the motor to turn the shaft, the other half of the turn, the switch abruptly disconnected the motor circuit and connected the generator circuit to charge the battery, then abruptly repeated the cycle. Of course, modern science will laugh at this device and immediately say "entropy will kill that due to heat and losses!" But, they are looking at it as a closed system. They are not taking into account the enormous vacuum energy the battery is bathed in. The real "magic" is happening in the ions of the battery. Getting the abrupt change in direction of giving/receiving energy every half cycle is shocking the vacuum... smacking it... and when you tune the system properly, after each smack, energy is cohered from the vacuum and brought into the system and will be more than the system loses due to common entropy types of losses. Now, it should be said... this energy being cohered into the system is via the nucleus of the battery ions... NOT via the electrons of the ions. So, even though you are getting more energy into the system... and energy that can do work... it is not exactly the same kind of energy we are used to. Henry T. Moray's device was pumping out 50,000 Watts... but the circuits ran cool... not hot. Best way I can explain it: we're used to energy that runs forward in time, which heats up circuits. Energy from the vacuum seems to run backward in time, so circuits run cool as you go forward in time. Some of our modern circuitry may not be compatible with this type of energy. But you can still use this energy to run a generator to produce the type of energy we are used to. SIDE NOTE: I think this is what the "Cold Fusion" scientists stumbled on... but they we're cohering the energy from the vacuum in a much more convoluted manner. Nonetheless, I think they were doing it... it wasn't junk science. Still, from their experience, you can see how the scientific community loves to bury these types of findings when they try to go mainstream (along with discrediting/marginalizing the scientists who discover it). I wish I could say all the conspiracy theories around the suppression of these discoveries were untrue... but you'll know all-too-soon for yourself how they aren't if you continue pressing mainstream scientists to validate or take this stuff seriously. Like the Plato's Cave allegory, you've been taken out of the cave and into the light and can see there's a much bigger world out there... but try to tell the others still watching shadow-play in the cave... they'll bury you rather than listen to you.
I've always wanted to fix our energy, transportation, and medical problems. With the energy available in the vacuum, it will solve all our energy needs... and it is more than enough to overcome the energy needed to have transportation via gravity (see Moray B. King's books for more on this and the math involved). Also, I believe Royal Raymond Rife has figured the solution to the majority of our medical problems. So, great answers to all three problems... but... we'll only see it in our lifetime if we do it ourselves and not publicly. Mainstream science is controlled by corrupt, conspiring people who don't want us to have these solutions. They just want to line their pockets with gold and they don't care how many tears are shed and lives destroyed in the process. I wish you the best on your journey down the road of truth... I'm just sad to say, there are many cracks, potholes, and cliffs due to the corrupt people of secret (and not so secret) organizations, those who conspire to profit from our ignorance, and the masses of sheeple/scientists/politicians that surround and knowingly (or unknowingly) support them and their agendas. I wish it wasn't so, but such it is. Best of luck navigating the morass before you. Just know, you're not alone.
This is what happens when you stick your head out of the "box" that our society and scientific community have wrapped around us. Only if you research the things they want you to, do what you're told, are you left alone. But subjects like Zero Point Energy and Gravity research... that is for the black budget hierarchy and you don't get to delve into that unless you're a part of those dark branches. Try to bring that stuff up in main-stream science... they will slap your hand, ridicule you, discredit you, ostracize you, fire you, blacklist you, and if you keep going... silence you. Do you really think Big Energy and Big Oil don't know about this stuff? They've been buying it up and shelving it for decades. There's a lot of martyrs out there... all too many are forgotten. Regardless, the truth is the truth. Nature works how nature works. Anyone who wants to understand it more can do so on their own... just don't expect to ever profit from it or have it published in a respected journal without repercussions. If you really want to understand more about this, I recommend reading books by Moray B. King (the ones on Zero-Point Energy) and Tom Bearden (Energy From the Vacuum), and Henry T. Moray (The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats). John Archibald Wheeler, past Princeton physics professor, calculated in his book "Geometrodynamics" that one cubic centimeter of vacuum contained this mass-equivalent of energy of 10^94 grams of matter. Our Milky Way galaxy contains about 10^45 grams of matter. So, if we lined up all the grams of matter of the Milky Way galaxy... replaced each gram with another Milky Way galaxy... and times all that by 10,000... that's the mass-equivalent of the energy contained in a single cubic centimeter of vacuum. People say there is an energy crisis... I say there is an energy-ignorance crisis. We're surrounded by all the energy we could ever want... we're literally bathed in it. The Michelson-Morley experiment tried to determine if the aether existed... but they couldn't detect any static aether. So, everyone then believed the vacuum was truly empty. But, all that experiment did is determine that was no static aether... which I believe is true. But it in NO way determined there was not a DYNAMIC aether... which I do believe is how the nature of the vacuum truly is. I think this video really helps explain it and validate that a bit better science-wise (though there are way too many unrelated visuals presented, which I find distracting and basically useless... and many, sadly, even misleading).
Of course, the real stickler is... how do we benefit from all this energy we're bathed in? How do we get the energy out? I've seen articles where some scientist finally admit they know about the vast energy potential of the "quantum foam" of the vacuum. But they pass it off by saying, "the energy is random, so there's no way to take advantage of it." And that's how they try to close the book on it. Well, there once was a chemist by the name of Ilya Prigogine... from Wikipedia: "Prigogine defined dissipative structures and their role in thermodynamic systems far from equilibrium, a discovery that won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1977. ... Dissipative structure theory led to pioneering research in self-organizing systems." If you look at the vacuum, you'll find it fits all of Prigogine's requirements to have self-organization. Basically, we can get ordered energy out of the "chaotic" vacuum. So, yes, it is "random" energy but it is not impossible to get ordered energy from it. In fact, there are claims by some that it is rather easy to cohere energy from the vacuum... all you got to do is get an ion source and hit it with a pulse or square wave. You'll have to spend some time finding the right frequency, perhaps something like a resonant frequency, but when you do, the resultant frequency will "ring like a bell" and you'll get big spikes of energy being produced... much greater than the hammer hitting the bell, as it were. If you have a system to capture those big returns of energy... you win. It's basically a pumping action... you slap the vacuum, and it slaps back harder than you slapped it.
Back in 1984, John Bedini wrote a thin book on how to make a "Free Energy" machine based on this principle. He took an ion source (a motorcycle battery), hooked it to a DC motor that turned a shaft that had on it a flywheel, a switching device, and a generator. So, for half of the shaft's turn, the switch had the battery power the motor to turn the shaft, the other half of the turn, the switch abruptly disconnected the motor circuit and connected the generator circuit to charge the battery, then abruptly repeated the cycle. Of course, modern science will laugh at this device and immediately say "entropy will kill that due to heat and losses!" But, they are looking at it as a closed system. They are not taking into account the enormous vacuum energy the battery is bathed in. The real "magic" is happening in the ions of the battery. Getting the abrupt change in direction of giving/receiving energy every half cycle is shocking the vacuum... smacking it... and when you tune the system properly, after each smack, energy is cohered from the vacuum and brought into the system and will be more than the system loses due to common entropy types of losses. Now, it should be said... this energy being cohered into the system is via the nucleus of the battery ions... NOT via the electrons of the ions. So, even though you are getting more energy into the system... and energy that can do work... it is not exactly the same kind of energy we are used to. Henry T. Moray's device was pumping out 50,000 Watts... but the circuits ran cool... not hot. Best way I can explain it: we're used to energy that runs forward in time, which heats up circuits. Energy from the vacuum seems to run backward in time, so circuits run cool as you go forward in time. Some of our modern circuitry may not be compatible with this type of energy. But you can still use this energy to run a generator to produce the type of energy we are used to. SIDE NOTE: I think this is what the "Cold Fusion" scientists stumbled on... but they we're cohering the energy from the vacuum in a much more convoluted manner. Nonetheless, I think they were doing it... it wasn't junk science. Still, from their experience, you can see how the scientific community loves to bury these types of findings when they try to go mainstream (along with discrediting/marginalizing the scientists who discover it). I wish I could say all the conspiracy theories around the suppression of these discoveries were untrue... but you'll know all-too-soon for yourself how they aren't if you continue pressing mainstream scientists to validate or take this stuff seriously. Like the Plato's Cave allegory, you've been taken out of the cave and into the light and can see there's a much bigger world out there... but try to tell the others still watching shadow-play in the cave... they'll bury you rather than listen to you.
I've always wanted to fix our energy, transportation, and medical problems. With the energy available in the vacuum, it will solve all our energy needs... and it is more than enough to overcome the energy needed to have transportation via gravity (see Moray B. King's books for more on this and the math involved). Also, I believe Royal Raymond Rife has figured the solution to the majority of our medical problems. So, great answers to all three problems... but... we'll only see it in our lifetime if we do it ourselves and not publicly. Mainstream science is controlled by corrupt, conspiring people who don't want us to have these solutions. They just want to line their pockets with gold and they don't care how many tears are shed and lives destroyed in the process. I wish you the best on your journey down the road of truth... I'm just sad to say, there are many cracks, potholes, and cliffs due to the corrupt people of secret (and not so secret) organizations, those who conspire to profit from our ignorance, and the masses of sheeple/scientists/politicians that surround and knowingly (or unknowingly) support them and their agendas. I wish it wasn't so, but such it is. Best of luck navigating the morass before you. Just know, you're not alone.
Humans are getting there ⚡️🛸⚡️
Fascinating. The intro very intriguing. I see the potential. Presentation seem to meander .
very impressed by this video, very well researched
Those who say they understand quantum physics don't understand quantum physics.
Polly want a cracker?
1920s - 40s perhaps, this was true.
Century after such concepts came into existence, and many embraced these principles as now they exist as being fundamental beliefs, core values and shared concepts.
Today, people are much more aligned with these ideas, having replaced notions of the outmoded atomic view or perspective, a view of reality popular during the 1950s - 70s.
4 months from today, 2025 and mankind will remain 'stayin' alive'.
Thoughts and ideas change, like fashion and music, thankfully!
Just as we are living through our own self-imposed evolution, we manifest ourselves as products, realised in collective social interactions, through higher consciousness, all is thought.
We become, what was once, little more than a shared idea or vision.
Once conceptually agreed and shared, ideas spread from being more conceptual ideas, to becoming philosophical tenets and principles. The Tao, the way.
@Jocke1336 Like those who say they remember the '60s.
@@crazywiener11 The curse of dementia is strong in this one
Well, understanding implies you made some connections in your brain enough to form coherent picture of something. In quantum physics there is no coherent picture, there is few snippets here and there and glaring giant holes between them. When you get on fundamental level of something you naturally expect simple truths, basic axioms, this is how systems develops, from simple to complex, but quantum theory not dealing with fundamental stuff, it dealing with foken emergent complexity bullshit, and true fundamental level is currently unreachable for us.
It's not the Matter you can see that matters, but what is around the Matter that really matters.
Gray matters
We're matter, the stars are matter but it doesnt matter
Exactly you can’t make something out of nothing. If those particles just appear then there is something there. They don’t just magically appear. They are in the background so it has always been here and always will be in one form or another. Nobody can say in the whole of eternity our universe just appeared for the first time and will eventually go and nothing ever will happen again. That isn’t logical. That would mean once our universe disappears the particles and anti particles must also disappear which they cant because how would it of happened in the first place?
The simple solution is in Tegmark's theory of Mathematical Existence. Everything that exists mathematically exists physically. Eternal existence. We just find ourselves in this "speck: of Existence and call it the "Universe". How conceited! I humble myself to Eternity.
Why can't something come from nothing? Because you say so? Because it makes you confused and nervous? Maybe the universe is one large quantum fluctuation.
@@kevinpotts123 I don't think your using the same definition of nothing. No space, no time, no energetic quantum fields or quantum foam. Nothing. Complete oblivion, the absence of any possibility.
@@kevinpotts123 quantum fluctuation is something. If there was nothing then there wouldn’t be any quantum fluctuation. Nothing means nothing.
@@NecrozeneOntological mathematics explains the existence of existence itself
These videos are fabulous; they are so well written, and thought provoking! 💫 👌 🌠 👍
This video is very good. It deserves better than its senseless clickbait title.
This is one of the better, if not best, explanations of the "something from nothing" riddle of physics! Thanks.
The start of the video is incorrect. Empty space is something. It's called spacetime.
So beautiful.
With luck and more power to you. Hoping for more videos.
Wow, this video is really something. Quantum physics is not counter intuitive, it's pure intuition. The real definition of intuition referring to perception beyond the senses a perception which is not bound by timeline or spacial constraints.
Intuition is just subconscious reasoning 🤦♂ You talking about psychic abilities, extrasensory perception.
@@Big_Sloppa Intuition and reason are not the same. People use the word in different ways, but they most commonly use Intuition as extra sensory perception
With the two plates, it sounds more like a propulsive force pushing the plates together, rather than an attractive force pulling the plates together when the plates block the fields.
The plates have to be close enough to block one or more wavelengths while allowing the rest to pass. This minor gradient causes an imbalance in the pressure on either side of the plates. It's a quantum cavitation bubble... So the visual used is not great, and the explanation isn't either. This effect is very small because the band gap distances needed to block field interactions are pretty much touching... there is no available potential energy. Yes there is work being done, and force is being generated. But, it's an external effect and not something that can be used outside of the context you find it.
His argument is correct in that one instance because virtual particles don't technically exist as tangible point particles. So saying that the plates attract through vacuum pressure is better than saying that they are propelled by vacuum pressure.
The universe is what it is. I find the challenges to understand it interesting and often fascinating. I believe these quantum effects are associated with dimensional realities that we, trapped within our dimensional framework, are unable to perceive, These extra dimensions do exist though. The energy hosted within these other dimensions can produce particles into our perceived reality, which appear to us, as coming out of nowhere. I don't consider any of this to be terrifying though. It's fun to learn and to think about all the possibilities that may exist.🙂
I agree with this, I’ve thought the same thing.
The universe is a amassing, beautiful and incredibly complex structure. Our confusion is coming from a few incorrect fundamental assumptions. If we stand on a solid ground will be easy to understand all these puzzles. There is one book which is explaining the Universe in simple therms - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" I hope that this will help.
people have sought external explanations of things for so long that even some quantum physicists have trouble looking into things ~ we figured soul came from outside the body, but consciousness is now being seen as coming from subatomic depths,
and yet
physicists who think space/time's particle gifts are coming from deep within it are dismissed as unscientific
...the 'mind' looks out from the hidden depths of space/time, but is often disabled by disbelief
@@jhe9521 Experience has taught me to quiet my mind, release tension, to look within. To do this without preconceived notions or expectations of the outcome, achieves the best result. This meditative process, going inside, paying attention to intuitive promptings; It's very helpful in revealing answers, clarifying truth.
Space is never empty there is always EM fields! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Whoever said “you can’t get something from nothing” is not married and has never been in trouble from something that happened in one of her dreams 😂
Good one
Hire a narrator this ai is confusing
This channel is part of a group of channels who use AI narration and low-effort. speculative topics to generate content/ad revenue. You can tell which channels are like that by their profile picture. If it's a black & white profile picture and if the channel's name itself is random, you're likely looking at a channel run mostly by an AI (though likely curated by someone running all of these channels). You can look at their list of videos too, and you'll probably see a similar pattern of topics too, all with basically fluff content. I'd avoid these channels at all costs.
U r just jealous lol, he making thousands of dollars with this ai channel @@ToyokaX
Extra confusing because there's a voice actor whose website I came across years back who sounds an awful lot like this AI. Such a shame.
isn't this Eric Dubay ,the flat Earth guy ?
@@ToyokaX Yes and for some reason RUclips is ever increasingly showing me this garbage in the algorithm.
Beautifully presented, want to learn more about charm quark!
Everyone should read “The Kybalion”
Awesomeness - This is the first time have been introduced to the Casmir Effect.
0:15 How can ‘empty space” be manipulated to make a particle then? You skipped this bit and started rambling about particles without explaining the forces used or required to create these “particles”.
I was going to comment the same thing… I’m getting sick of implied logic from gobbledegook
Maybe they left out the part which explains "space is not empty" .
There is nothing to fear really. ❤
@@diehardoften8798 OK, so where did these beginning particles emerge from? Unless they were always there, but I don't buy that as it would defy the very definition of 'empty'. None of us have any fear, we all just want clarity.. ::)
I wanted to write the same thing. They skip important parts to avoid what makes sense which is God created everything. God's wisdom and power is beyond our imagination and any theory of quantum physics. God is infinitely more complex than that. Men build walls between them and God then desperately tries to discover the fabric of life denying the Creator. I admire intelligent people but some of them seem to miss the most important part of the equation. Jesus Christ the Creator.
@@veronical3135 prove it
Looks like the universe and reality are under continual construction, destruction and re-construction without beginning or end but always beginning and ending everywhere all the time add infinitum. This clashes with big bang theory but that theory has always many self contradictions. Great deep video. Thanks to the whole team.
I want to crack up laughing every time I hear about Gluon's (glue-ons). Where do you glue them on? Please excuse my dry humour.
I’m pretty sure they unironically chose that name deliberately because they were literally hypothesizing a particle that holds stuff together.
gluons are like strapons but they require much more of a commitment
And besides, if they called them tackyions, that would be far too confusing
Is anything truly important or ever complete without a bit of ironic intent? Maybe nothing, but maybe not... Y knots are generative, so I feel hopeful there is no thing possible which can be thought of and understood and may be brought through our awareness into seeming reality, which is really only real because nothing real is ever beyond our perceptions but we can abstract it into time space if we think our reality is actually real. We can't prove everything isn't nothing or know that nothing is real. Because words, teh sux. Extra Lamed.
Wait till you meet the klingons.
I once had a job in a machine shop. They assigned me a drill motor and a bunch of drill bits of a certain size and had me drill a bunch of holes. So I did. They liked that I drilled plenty of holes. I just said that I was creating nothing where there was something!
😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Awesome 😅
You say something can come from nothing and then proceed to say when two particles collide. Particles aren’t nothing.
Black holes separate hydrogen particles and they can reform as anything. Black matter makes up 80% of the universe and is only detected by gravitational force. (WIMPs) or axions are particles of the black matter and are huge research initiatives of CERN and the hadron collider that could potentially destroy our planet and possibly galaxy…. Kinda wonder if they should just leave it alone….
Yep, and so do fields they exist on.
This is a brilliant presentation. I thoroughly enjoyed it!
Glad you enjoyed it!
When I say there is nothing... that doesn't mean there are small things present. It means there is nothing there. Nothing.
Great lecture. Love it
Oh stop it, there's nothing scientists "won't talk about".
Clever.
Maybe there are two universes, and ours lies just in the border between them... one of Just eternal Space, And one of Just Eternal Energy... And The Laws of phisics binds them together into the history of creation
It all sounds really good but here's a new question cumming up in the field of astronomy. If the observable universe is 93 billion light years across and we estimate that this is only 5% to 15% of the total size of the universe(but the universe could be infinite) then we have to stop saying it all began 13.8 billiin years ago . For 5% to 15% of the universe it appears to have begun 13.8 billion years ago but that isn't the whole universe.. if rough estimates are correct then the universe could be around 100,000,000,000,000 . That's 100 trillion. It would take you approximately 316,880 years to count that high .. what we call time simply could not traveled that far.. but yet we know the farther we look the more we keep seeing, the deeper it keeps getting .. so if this "bang" happened 13.8 billion years ago and time and space were created then and it can only have moved or expanded to 93bly in that amount of time than what is the other 95,999,999,999,999 trillion light years ? .. we keep looking and it just gets deeper . James Webb can see farther than Hubble and it was with Hubble that we came up with this 93bly distance . But Webb can see farther . So this part is 13.8 billion years old but the rest of it "the other 85 to 95% of the universe that we know is there just doesn't exist? Or doesn't exist yet ? And how can we say anything began at all when we don't even know what it's made of in the first place . Please tell me what gravity is ? Not what it does . What exactly is dark matter and dark energy? Not what they do Hmmm . Where are or how were these things created ? I think it would be a good idea to figure out what it all is first before we keep saying what we know . Because that keeps changing . I mean think about this .. when I was a kid I knew that black holes were everywhere and that almost all stars had planets orbiting them. But if you were an adult you would have been laughed at. If you were an astronomer in that time you would have been black listed and would have had to change careers! No exaggerating. That was not long ago, only the 80's ! Our understandings of everything and our knowledge of everything keeps changing the more we learn.
For instance If our calculations correct than we have to be ourselves a pocket universe of something much much larger . If the larger universe is 100 trillion light years across then time for it has to be the same . And in that time in a small pocket a piece got incredibly dense and exploded. Creating our universe. We are most likely a part of something very much like what we see now just on a larger scale . Imagine something like 2 neutron stars one billion light years across, and they smash into each other or something even larger !
I think you are not understanding that space itself is expanding meaning parts of it are moving away from us faster than the speed of light which is why parts of it are no longer observable. The universe is 13.8 billion years old.
@@mremtb7689no it is not… the idea that we CAN know the age of the universe is ridiculous…
If there was an intended sexual joke in your comment, I missed it. I can only assume you accidentally spelled "coming" as "cumming"?
Have you heard this theory that the milky way is inside the biggest void our universe has? It's really weird
I love this video. Highly thought provoking, if one sets the ego aside.
_There I stand now, poor fool,_
_And I'm as smart as ever!_
_Hot masters, even hot doctors,_
_And I'm already moving on for ten years_
_Up, down and across and crooked_
_Fooling my students -_
_And see that we cannot know anything!_
All is in flow. Life is only lived in actuality. Fractals are fluid. Hen to pen is a dynamic event not an in stasis situation. Maximum nothingness, Casimir effect, virtual partials, very interesting. I call that the collective consciousness. Uncertainty principle, on and on of the info in this video...why did I not know the consensus terms to these things that I have my own pet names for? ☺️. I do now.
Thanks for this upload!
E=MC^2. If there is energy in the vacuum, the large the vacuum, the higher the chance of creating matter from it.
We are forgetting that what we're all, truly, commenting, arguing or debating about, are just man-made WORDS. 🙄
“Something from nothing” well there was something lol
Kinda proves there’s no such thing as
“nothing”
That something was what we call nothing
Nothing = Something
Vacuum = Something
That definition is called magick by metaphysical folks. So scientists are saying the universe was created by magick.
@@ianlassitter2397 as far as we understand it, it was magic, there will be a scientific explination of course we just dont properly or fully understand the process yet
Wow cool stuff dude, cheers.
When 2 particles collide in empty space, that space is not empty anymore. It has 2 collided particles in it.
Entertaining and accessible presentation.
watch this video titled "be limitless lost in cosmos" just search this and watch you will be amazed.
after watching this, it just reinforces simulation theory, to me. The universe is like a big TV, the part we think is empty, isn't empty... we just can't see it (black screen).
Here's a problem with simulation theory. Suppose it were true, and suppose people in the real world contacted us. Suppose we asked them to send us information about the real world's physics. Upon getting that info, would it make any more sense to you than our simulated physics? Would real physics look any less like a simulation to you?
@@Hurlebattehell, I’d imagine anything outside our natural base of the universe would be horrific. There’s a reason Cthulhu and other eldritch horrors like him get under people’s skin. He steps out of the natural bounds of our reality and introduces something that just SHOULDN’T be in our world…himself
I love such stuff and your voice and way of speaking is so hypnotic.
The best example i can think of for something coming from nothing is the creation of a recording.
We can all view the same recording and have a different experience.
Sounds like the cycle of life .
If everything is a recording on the spiritual level it all makes sense.
The letters you print on the screen, are time capsules, life-preserving symbols of thoughts, expressed from consciousness.
All is mind, Mind is everything, Thought is everywhere and Meaning in everything. The vacuum is just an atmospheric baseline.
There is still energy in every square inch of empty space, billions of electron volts, shifting, moving, changing, constantly the same.
@@mrhassell well said.
This is the first video that I watch from this channel. The title is a bit clickbait, so I wasn't expecting much. However, the video is great.
You said universe can truly creat something from nothing (something) but at same time it is said that universe itself came from nothing or created out of nothing. Totaly confused Please answer. It appears our Science and physics is broken. And we can't think further anymore we have hit the dead end.
Did you know that in 1889, the commissioner of the US patent office publicly stated that the office would need to downsize and eventually close because pretty much everything that could be invented had already been invented? Your comment brought him to mind for some reason
@@mustwereallydothis yes I do know about him. But I said it is broken..and i never said if it is broken then it cannot be fix..it can be fix. Don't force your word on me.
Even the Law of conservation of energy prohibiting such statements - that "Something can come out from Nothing". Science for long time is developing incorrect fundamental assumptions which is leading to a dead end. Surprisingly, there is one book which is addressing these misconceptions - "Theory of Everything in Physics and the Universe"
Space is not empty. It is full of plasma. I don't remember exactly now but around 20 years since it was confirmed in experiments that plasma in vacum create dust.
Keep up the good work. Shout out from chile.
NOTHING SHOULDN'T EVEN BE A WORD.
How much money do you owe me?
"Nothing" is relative, depends on the context of how it is used, and to what (if anything) it refers to.
A personal question I ask is how old is the space in which our universe resides in? A reoccurring shape that springs up in science is the circle and it 3 dimensional relative the sphere. A circle is predominantly used to chart cycles and I think that is a part of what a universe is. The motion appears to have no beginning and no end.
Space time and matter exists in infinite beginning and going forever in cycle ♻️
You bring quantum physics to life. Very mesmerizing.
Something from nothing is called magic.
it's called a miracle
Nice work bro❤
so energy need to be present. is energy nothing ?
what is the energy behind a flower blooming
shape and charge are the fundamentals
emptiness was shaped for charge
they are tautological rubberband
getting our attention
this tension
is everything
in syzygy.
Just wanted to share my experience with Hidden Pineal Gland Activation from Shirlest. I felt a dramatic shift after following their guidance. I've become more in tune with my intuition and the creative ideas just flow now!
Philosophers wise.
Physicists carpenters.
Mathematicians plumbers.
Statisticians strugglers.
Philosophers-arrangers of the furniture of the universe
We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
Mathematicians are wankers.
I can’t get over how transformative the Hidden Pineal Gland Activation from Shirlest has been for me. I now often lucid dream and it feels like my intuition has doubled. This is definitely something more people should explore!
Our math is flawed, until that gets fixed we can’t use the advanced technologies that exist
Not the maths. What needs to be fixed is the notion that space-time is all that is. If this is NOT the case, then physics can never solve all the problems it faces because it is excluding the super-physical causes that have physical effects.
Well, I think you are both right, yet without you contradicting her statement. Our math is fundamentally broken and we already have at least 5 new models that are significantly more accurate and precise. Yet, there is close to no chance that it will ever be introduced on a larger scale. Simply put, it would require too much rebuilding of 'stuff' that some people make a living of AND, more importantly, their egos.
There is but one hope, though: AI! I'm not talking about LLM's like Chat GPT (which is NOT technically an AI). I'm talking about AI equipped with 'perception' that can gather and transform data. In one experiment an AI model already figured 5 different ways to describe gravitation and 3 of them worked better at predicting future outcomes than our current mathematics+physics. Issue is, though, we still try to make sense of it using our existing mathematics. No-go. We, somehow, need to let go of worship of our geniuses past, our ego, and simply start having fun again! So, as I already said, close to impossible. :)
You are very neieve to believe the governments around the world "can't use advanced technologies." For example, the plane 370 that disappeared on the way to Maylasia..we are far more advanced then you could possibly imagine.
Newton's Gravity is conceptually totally different to Einstein's Special Relativity.
Perhaps, Mileva Maric had more to do with the concept, which she is not credited for, yet received all the prize money for?
At any rate, Zwicky saw Newton's usage in General Relativity and so, he simply chose to use that in 1933 at Mount Wilson and created Dark Matter.
There is no darkness. Merely, the absence of light. 🌀
We don't know if math is flawed, we just know something is flawed, but we can't point finger at what exactly.
Excellent!!! Excellent!! Thank you
Well, that's enough gobbledegook for one day. I didn't understand a word of it. So I'm have a cuppa tea and watch tv.
There once was a tv show, that was all about nothing. At least that is what George said.
True! We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states: "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
This can be based on E=MC² with the squaring of the speed of light representing a geometrical process forming a square of probability Ψ²
We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.
*LOVED absolutely EVERYTHING* except the part, at the end, where you did something about "it's all just Nothin" I see what you're trying to say but, honestly, your 'thesis' is the polar opposite of what I was getting from the data 🤓
Didn't Wayne's World, bring up the Schwinger Effect?
Good content!
Space isn't empty
When the narrator said the universe consists of dynamic Feilds over static things…it kinda reminds me of the study of biocentrism.
I love this stuff.
Amazing work
"Nothing came from nothing" should be the sentence. A hole is literally the absence of an electron. There is nothing added to the soup. Its like how shadows can easily beat the speed of light, nothing does not have a speed limit.
Shadows do not beat the speed is light
There's nothing in the desert. No man needs nothing.
Lawrence of Arabia
No Man needs No Thing
Physics is like art, not so much about form, or light, or color, but about questioning the nature of the esthetic experience, itself, by offering hope that dissonances will be communally resolved.
Not for nothing , but this needs to be made simple in language , so those who are not up to the many concepts but yet have and understanding can follow . This does not help . To fast and cannot relate .
It’s a complicated subject.
By definition a singularity is an event that occurred only once. Ultimately, any explanation of the universe or our own individual existences must resolve to a singular question: "What is the plausibility of an event that occurs only once?."
Everything exists in relationship. Everything. "Nothing" is a concept, but can't exist in 3d reality.
'Nothing' is what rocks dream of -Aristotle
@teejay89656
Well I for one good sir, believe rocks dream, cuz I gotta a rock dream, all hail the religion of scienceology.
Yes yes very intelligent. But dare I say this whole approach is like cutting a flower to a million pieces to understand the intrinsic nature of beauty! Here's a thought, have you ever stopped to think that just like all the elements that make up your human body existed before your arrival and will continue to exist after your departure, that maybe consciousness does aswel.
I think you'll find all the answers you seek if you started seeing the universe as a living breathing conscious entity, and interacted with it as such, instead of a cold dead thing for you to control and manipulate with sterile sciences that have no regard for spirituality.
I'll give you a clue it's not the answer you should be seeking, it's the question!
They made up eight different types of nothing 😂😂😂
No, you can't create something from nothing without violating logic and reason and the very foundation of science. It's like saying A can result from Not A. What you call "nothing" must necessarily be something you don't know (yet).
The Electric Hologram
The Electric Cybertruck.
The Electric Penis
Is there a chart of known energy fields in existence and is there a chart of theorized energy fields that may be in existence? Of course you'd be nice if there was an explanation of each build to give a better understanding and maybe even a chart showing their relationship to one another?
the terifying truth is photons are not real particles. same with the quarks
What's terrifying about that?
I think by now it is obvous that matter does not exist. It is all only energy.
@@freebozkurt9277And energy is a disturbance in quantum fields.
“Simply manipulating empty space correctly will cause something to appear.”
Hmmm. Interesting. Go on.
“When two particles collide in empty space…”
_immediately stops listening_
The grand number of sentient minds in the Universe is equal to.. One
I always say no matter how many people are born or die the population of the Universe is always one. 🙏
Ask Terrence Howard what he thinks!
Ultimately, any explanation of the universe and our own unique existences must resolve to a singular question which cannot be answered: "What is the plausibility of an event that occurs only once/"
nothing is nothing.
everything is everything.
Its a bit hard to follow as thoughts change a bit fast and sometimes logically unfinished, leading to question of story coherence
"A big fluctuation of nothing..." 21:18 Sounds a hell of a lot more like 'faith' (in literally "nothing") than the scientific pursuit of truth.
It is just like a religion.
We are getting there
Are we creating something from nothing, or are we creating matter from energy? The process described seems to require a field, i.e., energy. Is the energy in the field reduced by e=mc2 matter created?
I came, I left..
😂